Brian D. PEER, James W. RIVERS, Stephen I. ROTHSTEIN. 2013: The Brown-headed Cowbird: North America's avian brood parasite. Avian Research, 4(1): 93-98. DOI: 10.5122/cbirds.2013.0006
Citation: Brian D. PEER, James W. RIVERS, Stephen I. ROTHSTEIN. 2013: The Brown-headed Cowbird: North America's avian brood parasite. Avian Research, 4(1): 93-98. DOI: 10.5122/cbirds.2013.0006

The Brown-headed Cowbird: North America's avian brood parasite

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Brian D. Peer, E-mail: BD-Peer@wiu.edu

  • Received Date: 13 Feb 2013
  • Accepted Date: 08 Mar 2013
  • Available Online: 23 Apr 2023
  • There are five species of parasitic cowbirds (Molothrus) and the Brown-headed Cowbird (M. ater) is the only widespread species in North America. The Brown-headed Cowbird is a host generalist and is typically found in open habitats and forest edges. The cowbirds are of a more recent origin than many other brood parasites and perhaps as a result, cowbird adaptations for parasitism and their hosts' counter-adaptations to thwart parasitism do not appear as sophisticated as those of other brood parasite-host systems. Because of its generalist nature, the cowbird has the potential to negatively impact endangered host species whose populations are limited due to anthropogenic habitat loss. As a consequence, the Brown-headed Cowbird is one of the few brood parasitic species that is the subject of control programs to limit its effects on such hosts.

  • The Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater; Figs. 1 and 2) is the only widespread brood parasite in the United States and Canada. The Bronzed Cowbird (M. aeneus) is restricted to the southern United States (Peer and Sealy, 1999a; Ellison and Lowther, 2009) and the Shiny Cowbird (M. bonariensis) is found in limited numbers in the southeastern United States (Reetz et al., 2010; Post and Sykes, 2011). It was believed that the Shiny Cowbird would rapidly invade and spread into the southeastern states (Cruz et al., 1998; 2000), but their range expansion has stalled for reasons that are unclear. The Bronzed and Shiny Cowbirds are found primarily in the Neotropics and this region also has the remaining two species in the parasitic cowbird clade, the Giant (M. oryzivorus) and Screaming (M. rufoaxillaris) Cowbirds. The latter is one of the most special-ized brood parasites in the world, primarily parasitizing a single species and on occasion four other species (DiGiacomo et al., 2010). In contrast, the Shiny Cowbird (266 hosts), followed closely by the Brown-headed Cowbird (247 hosts; Lowther, 2012), has the largest number of known host species of any brood parasite.

    Figure  1.  A female (left) and male (right) Brown-headed Cowbird (photo by J. Rivers)
    Figure  2.  A Brown-headed Cowbird nestling in a Bell's Vireo nest. This host species typically raises only a cowbird and none of its own young when parasitized (photo by J. Rivers).

    Cowbirds are considered grassland and edge species, but they also search for host nests in forested habitats. Brown-headed Cowbirds (hereafter cowbirds) commute large distances (7–15 km) on a daily basis between breeding and foraging locations (Dufty, 1982; Rothstein et al., 1984; Thompson, 1994; Curson et al., 2000). Their foraging habitat includes grasslands and pastures where they feed on seeds and invertebrates (Ortega, 1998), and they show a distinct preference for foraging in association with livestock which flush insects in these areas (Ortega, 1998). Historically, cowbirds followed and foraged in association with bison (Bison bison) herds (Mayfield, 1965). Their preference of open habitats has also impacted the evolution of host defenses, because all hosts known to eject cowbird eggs mostly nest in grasslands or open areas along edges apparently due to the fact these hosts have had the longest period of time to evolve defenses (Peer and Sealy, 2004).

    The cowbird is a host generalist and usually parasitizes open-cup nesting species and avoids those that nest in cavities (Ortega, 1998; but see Peer et al., 2006; Hoover and Robinson, 2007). Cowbirds use hosts that feed their young insects (Ortega, 1998), but they also parasitize those with diets of seed and fruit despite the fact their young do not survive on such diets (Rothstein, 1976; Middleton, 1991; Kozlovic et al., 1996). Parasitism frequencies vary regionally, within hosts, and seasonally. For example in the fragmented forests of Illinois, parasitism frequencies are often 100% (Robinson, 1992; Fig. 3). Birds nesting at forest edges and in shrublands are parasitized at intermediate frequencies and those nesting in grasslands in the same region are rarely parasitized (Peer et al., 2000). In contrast, in the center of the cowbird's historic range in Kansas where the landscape consists almost wholly of grasslands, grassland species are parasitized at high frequencies (Elliott, 1978; Rivers et al., 2010). Parasitism of some host species, notably the Red-winged Blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus) and Dickcissel (Spiza americana), also vary geographically (Linz and Bolin, 1982; Jensen and Cully, 1995; Searcy and Yasukawa, 1995) possibly due to alternative host choices within given avian communities (e.g., Barber and Martin, 1997).

    Figure  3.  A Wood Thrush nest parasitized with a single cowbird egg. In parts of its range, 100% of Wood Thrush nests are parasitized by cowbirds (photo by B. Peer).

    Individual female cowbirds sometimes specialize on a particular host species and in other cases use multiple hosts (Alderson et al., 1999; Strausberger and Ashley, 2005), and host usage by individual female cowbirds is an area in need of further research. Estimates of the numbers of eggs laid by individual females in the wild range from 13 to more than 40 (Scott and Ankney, 1983; Fleischer et al., 1987; Alderson et al., 1999; see also Holford and Roby, 1993), but there is some consensus that cowbirds lay eggs on about 70–80% of the days during their breeding season (Fleischer et al., 1987). Multiple parasitism is relatively common in cowbirds (Robinson, 1992; Rivers et al., 2010; Fig. 4) and can result from multiple females parasitizing a nest or indi-vidual females laying multiple eggs within a single nest (Alderson et al., 1999; McLaren et al., 2003; Rivers et al., 2012).

    Figure  4.  A multiply parasitized Dickcissel nest with five host eggs (blue) and four cowbird eggs (white with brown spots) (photo by J. Rivers)

    In comparison to other brood parasite-host systems, cowbirds and their hosts have interacted for a relatively short time; the Molothrus clade is only 2.8–3.8 million years old (Rothstein et al., 2002). Perhaps as a result, the Brown-headed Cowbird lacks some adaptations possessed by other brood parasites (Mermoz and Ornelas, 2004) including mimicry of host eggs (Rothstein and Robinson, 1998; but see Peer et al. 2002), or evidence of specialized nestling adaptations such as directly killing nestmates (Lichtenstein and Sealy, 1998; Peer et al., 2013). Among the adaptations possessed by cowbird are that females have a larger hippocampus to remember where host nests are located (Sherry et al., 2003); laying eggs rapidly and before sunrise to avoid detection by hosts (Scott, 1991; Sealy et al., 1995; see also Peer and Sealy, 1999b); thick eggshells presumably to withstand puncture-ejection by hosts (Picman, 1989); greater pore diameter in their eggshells for increased embryonic respiration and shorter incubation periods (Jaeckle et al., 2012; see also Briskie and Sealy, 1990); removal of host eggs by females in conjunction with parasitism to enhance incubation efficiency (Peer and Bollinger, 1997; 2000) and for nutrition (Sealy, 1992); egg puncture and killing nestlings to force hosts to renest providing additional chances for parasitism (Arcese et al., 1996; Elliott, 1999; Hoover and Robinson, 2007; Dubina and Peer, 2013); and possibly forcing hosts to accept parasitism through mafia enforcement tactics (Hoover and Robinson, 2007).

    Likewise, host defenses against cowbird parasitism appear to be relatively unsophisticated. For example, many hosts aggressively defend their nests against cowbirds, but the success of this strategy in preventing parasitism is limited (Sealy et al., 1998). Only approximately 10% of hosts reject cowbird eggs (Peer and Sealy, 2004; Fig. 5) and there is a bimodal response in that most hosts either accept or reject 100% of the time (Rothstein, 1975; Peer and Sealy, 2004), although more intermediate rejecters have been recently discovered (Peer et al., 2000, 2002, 2006). Smaller hosts are more likely to desert parasitized nests likely due to bill-size constraints that prevent egg ejection or simply because nest desertion evolves more easily than egg ejection (Hosoi and Rothstein, 2000). One host, the Yellow Warbler (Dendroica petchia), is unique because it often buries cowbird eggs in a new nest lining (Sealy, 1995) and it also has a specific referential call for cowbirds (Gill and Sealy, 2004). The lack of adaptive response to parasitism in newly parasitized hosts and some others appears to be due to an evolutionary lag (Rothstein, 1975; Peer and Sealy, 2004). Hosts with small bills that have difficulty in removing the cowbird egg or those with eggs that resemble cowbird eggs and may mistake them for their own may be in an evolutionary equilibrium (e.g., Rohwer and Spaw, 1988), but there is no compelling evidence of equilibrium among cowbird hosts to date (Peer and Sealy, 2004).

    Figure  5.  A Gray Catbird nest parasitized by a cowbird. The catbird is a rejecter species but is still at least occasionally parasitized (photo by B. Peer)

    The Brown-headed Cowbird, and to a lesser extent the Shiny Cowbird, is unique among brood parasites because there are control programs designed to aid endangered species by culling cowbirds. To some extent, these control measures have been implemented based on misconceptions concerning impacts cowbirds have at the level of host populations and on incorrectly assuming that cowbirds rather than anthropogenic habitat destruction are limiting host populations (Rothstein and Peer, 2005). Unfortunately, there is no indication that control measures will cease despite some host populations having surpassed mandated minimum population goals and the expenditure of scarce management funds that could be put to better use (Hammer, 2011, unpubl. report). The management debate is exacerbated by the negative attitudes directed towards cowbirds by both birdwatchers and scientists (Ortega, 1998; see Peer et al., 2013, pers. observ.) that is not as apparent in other brood parasites. For example, an article in a North American journal solicited cowbird recipes (Schram, 1994)! In contrast, there is concern in Europe over the decline of the Common Cuckoo (Douglas et al., 2010). Birdwatchers and even some ornithologists in North America would likely rejoice if such declines occurred in the cowbird. This unfortunate attitude and scapegoating of the cowbird are detrimental to the conservation of endangered songbird species because it diverts attention from more important factors such as the anthropogenic habitat degradation underlying the declines of these species.

  • Alderson GW, Gibbs HL, Sealy SG. 1999. Determining the reproductive behaviour of individual Brown-headed Cowbirds using microsatellite DNA markers. Anim Behav, 58: 595–605.
    Arcese P, Smith JNM, Hatch MI. 1996. Nest predation by cowbirds and its consequences for passerine demography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 93: 4608–4611.
    Barber DR, Martin TE. 1997. Influence of alternate host densities on Brown-headed Cowbird parasitism rates in Black-capped Vireos. Condor, 99: 595–604.
    Briskie JV, Sealy SG. 1990. Evolution of short incubation periods in the parasitic cowbirds, Molothrus spp. Auk, 107: 789–794.
    Cruz A, Post W, Wiley JW, Ortega CP, Nakamura T, Prather JW. 1998. Potential impacts of cowbird range expansion in Florida. In: Rothstein SI, Robinson SK (eds) Parasitic Birds and Their Hosts. Studies in Coevolution. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 313–336.
    Cruz A, Prather JW, Post W, Wiley JW. 2000. The spread of Shiny and Brown-headed Cowbirds into the Florida region. In: Smith JNM, Cook TL, Rothstein SI, Robinson SK, Sealy SG (eds) Ecology and Management of Cowbirds and Their Hosts: Studies in the Conservation of North American Passerine Birds. University of Texas Press, Austin, pp 47–57.
    Curson DR, Goguen CB, Mathews NE. 2000. Long-distance commuting by Brown-headed Cowbirds in New Mexico. Auk, 117: 795–799.
    DiGiacomo AG, Mahler B, Reboreda JC. 2010. Screaming Cowbird parasitism of nests of Solitary Caciques and Cattle Tyrants. Wilson J Ornith, 122: 795–799.
    Douglas DJT, Newson SE, Leech DI, Noble DG, Robinson RA. 2010. How important are climate-induced changes in host availability for population processes in an obligate brood parasite, the European Cuckoo? Oikos, 119: 1834–1840.
    Dubina KM, Peer BD. 2013. Egg pecking and discrimination by female and male Brown-headed Cowbirds. J Ornithol. doi: .
    Dufty Jr AM. 1982. Movements and activities of radio-tracked Brown-headed Cowbirds. Auk, 99: 316–327.
    Elliott PF. 1978. Cowbird parasitism in the Kansas tallgrass prairie. Auk, 95: 161–167.
    Elliott PF. 1999. Killing of host nestlings by the Brown-headed Cowbird. J Field Ornithol, 70: 55–57.
    Ellison K, Lowther PE. 2009. Bronzed Cowbird (Molothrus aeneus). In: Poole A (ed) The Birds of North America Online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca. Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: " target="_blank">10.2173/bna.144">http://bna.birds.cornell.edu.bnaproxy.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/144doi:10.2173/bna.144.
    Fleischer RC, Smyth AP, Rothstein SI. 1987. Temporal and agerelated variation in the laying rate of the Brown-headed Cowbird in the eastern Sierra Nevada, CA. Can J Zool, 65: 2724–2730.
    Gill SA, Sealy SG. 2004. Functional reference in an alarm signal given during nest defence: seet calls of Yellow Warblers denote brood-parasitic Brown-headed Cowbirds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 56: 71–80.
    Hammer ML. 2011. The US Army, Fort Hood Garrison Annual Report.
    Holford KC, Roby DD. 1993. Factors limiting fecundity of captive Brown-headed Cowbirds. Condor, 95: 536–545.
    Hoover JP, Robinson SK. 2007. Retaliatory mafia behavior by a parasitic cowbird favors host acceptance of parasitic eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 104: 4479–4483.
    Hosoi SA, Rothstein SI. 2000. Nest desertion and cowbird parasitism: Evidence for evolved responses and evolutionary lag. Anim Behav, 59: 823–840.
    Jaeckle WB, Kiefer M, Childs B, Harper RG, Rivers JW, Peer BD. 2012. Comparison of eggshell porosity and estimated gas flux between the Brown-headed Cowbird and two common hosts. J Avian Biol, 43: 486–490.
    Jensen WE, Cully Jr JF. 2005. Geographic variation in Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater) parasitism on Dickcissels (Spiza americana) in Great Plains tallgrass prairie. Auk, 122: 648–660.
    Kozlovic DR, Knapton RW, Barlow JC. 1996. Unsuitability of the House Finch as a host of the Brown-headed Cowbird. Condor, 98: 253–258.
    Lichtenstein G, Sealy SG. 1998. Nestling competition, rather than supernormal stimulus, explains the success of parasitic Brown-headed Cowbird chicks in Yellow Warbler nests. Proc R Soc Lond B, 265: 249–254.
    Linz GM, Bolin SB, 1982. Incidence of Brown-headed Cowbird parasitism on Red-winged Blackbirds. Wilson Bull, 94: 93–95.
    Lowther PE. 2012. Lists of victims and hosts of the parasitic cowbirds (Molothrus). Field Museum version 11 Oct 2012. . Accessed 25 January 2013.
    Mayfield HF. 1965. The Brown-headed Cowbird, with old and new hosts. Living Bird, 4: 13–28.
    McLaren CM, Woolfenden BE, Gibbs HL, Sealy SG. 2003. Genetic and temporal patterns of multiple parasitism by Brown-headed Cowbirds (Molothrus ater) on Song Sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Can J Zool, 81: 281–286.
    Mermoz ME, Ornelas JJ. 2004. Phylogenetic analysis of life-history adaptations in parasitic cowbirds. Behav Ecol, 15: 109–119.
    Middleton ALA. 1991. Failure of Brown-headed Cowbird parasitism in nests of the American Goldfinch. J Field Ornithol, 62: 200–203.
    Ortega CP. 1998. Cowbirds and Other Brood Parasites. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
    Peer BD, Bollinger EK. 1997. Explanations for the infrequent cowbird parasitism on Common Grackles. Condor, 99: 151–161.
    Peer BD, Bollinger EK. 2000. Why do female Brown-headed Cowbirds remove host eggs? A test of the incubation efficiency hypothesis. In: Smith JNM, Cook TL, Rothstein SI, Robinson SK, Sealy SG (eds) Ecology and Management of Cowbirds and Their Hosts: Studies in the Conservation of North American Passerine Birds. University of Texas Press, Austin, pp 187–192.
    Peer BD, Ellison KE, Sealy SG. 2002. Intermediate frequencies of egg ejection by Northern Mockingbirds (Mimus polyglottos) sympatric with two cowbird species. Auk, 119: 855–858.
    Peer BD, Hawkins LR, Steinke EP, Bollinger PB, Bollinger EK. 2006. Eastern Bluebirds eject Brown-headed Cowbird eggs. Condor, 108: 741–745.
    Peer BD, Rivers JW, Rothstein SI. 2013. Cowbirds, conservation, and coevolution: Potential misconceptions and directions for future research. Chinese Birds, 4.
    Peer BD, Robinson SK, Herkert JR. 2000. Egg rejection by cowbird hosts in grasslands. Auk, 117: 892–901.
    Peer BD, Sealy SG. 1999a. Parasitism and egg puncture behavior by Bronzed and Brown-headed cowbirds in sympatry. Stud Avian Biol, 18: 235–240.
    Peer BD, Sealy SG. 1999b. Laying time of the Bronzed Cowbird. Wilson Bull. 111: 137–139.
    Peer BD, Sealy SG. 2004. Correlates of egg rejection in hosts of the Brown-headed Cowbird. Condor, 106: 580–599.
    Picman J. 1989. Mechanism of increased puncture resistance of eggs of Brown-headed Cowbirds. Auk, 106: 577–583.
    Post W, Sykes Jr PW. 2011 Reproductive status of the Shiny Cowbird in North America. Wilson J Ornithol, 123: 151–154.
    Reetz MJ, Musser JM, Kratter AW. 2010. Further evidence of breeding by Shiny Cowbirds in North America. Wilson J Ornithol, 122: 365–369.
    Rivers JW, Jensen WE, Kosciuch KL, Rothstein SI. 2010. Community-level patterns of host use by the Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater), a generalist brood parasite. Auk, 127: 263–273.
    Rivers JW, Young S, Gonzalez E, Horton B, Lock B, Fleischer RC. 2012. High levels of relatedness between Brown-headed Cow-bird nestmates in a heavily-parasitized host community. Auk, 129: 623–631.
    Robinson SK. 1992. Population dynamics of breeding Neotropical migrants in a fragmented Illinois landscape. In: Hagan Ⅲ JM, Johnston DW (eds) Ecology and Conservation of Neotropical Migrant Landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., pp 455–471.
    Rohwer S, Spaw CD. 1988. Evolutionary lag versus bill-size constraints: A comparative study of the acceptance of cowbird eggs by old hosts. Evol Ecol, 2: 27–36.
    Rothstein SI, Patten M, Fleischer RC. 2002. Phylogeny, specialization, and brood parasite–host coevolution: Some possible pitfalls of parsimony. Behav Ecol, 13: 1–10.
    Rothstein SI, Peer BD. 2005. Conservation solutions for threat-ened and endangered cowbird (Molothrus spp.) hosts: Separating fact from fiction. Ornithol Monogr, 57: 98–114.
    Rothstein SI, Robinson SK. 1998. Parasitic Birds and Their Hosts. Studies in Coevolution. Oxford University Press, New York.
    Rothstein SI, Verner J, Stevens E. 1984. Radio-tracking confirms a unique diurnal pattern of spatial occurrence in the parasitic brown-headed cowbird. Ecology, 65: 77–88.
    Rothstein SI. 1975. An experimental and teleonomic investigation of avian brood parasitism. Condor, 77: 50–271.
    Rothstein SI. 1976. Cowbird parasitism of the Cedar Waxwing and its evolutionary implications. Auk, 93: 498–509.
    Schram BA. 1994. An open solicitation for cowbird recipes. Birding, 26: 254–257.
    Scott DM, Ankeny CD. 1983. The laying cycle of Brown-headed Cowbirds: Passerine chickens? Auk, 100: 583–593.
    Scott DM. 1991. The time of day of egg laying by the Brown-headed Cowbird and other icterines. Can J Zool, 69: 2093–2099.
    Sealy SG, Neudorf DL, Hill DP. 1995. Rapid laying in Brown-headed Cowbirds Molothrus ater and other parasitic birds. Ibis, 137: 76–84.
    Sealy SG, Neudorf DL, Hobson KA, Gill SA. 1998. Nest defense by potential hosts of the Brown-headed Cowbird: Methodological approaches, benefits of defense, and coevolution. In: Rothstein SI, Robinson SK (eds) Parasitic Birds and Their Hosts. Studies in Coevolution. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 194–211.
    Sealy SG. 1992. Removal of Yellow Warbler eggs in association with cowbird parasitism. Condor, 94: 40–54.
    Sealy SG. 1995. Burial of cowbird eggs by parasitized Yellow Warblers: An empirical and experimental study. Anim Behav, 49: 877–889.
    Searcy WA, Yasukawa K. 1995. Polygyny and Sexual Selection in Red-winged Blackbirds. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
    Sherry DF, Forbes MR, Khurgel M, Ivy GO. 1993. Females have a larger hippocampus than males in the brood-parasitic Brown-headed Cowbird. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 90: 7839–7843.
    Strausberger BM, Ashley MV. 2005. Host use strategies of individual female Brown-headed Cowbirds Molothrus ater in a diverse avian community. J Avian Biol, 36: 313–321.
    Thompson Ⅲ FR. 1994. Temporal and spatial patterns of breeding Brown-headed Cowbirds in the Midwestern United States. Auk, 111: 979–990.

Catalog

    Figures(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1752) PDF downloads (1764) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return