Sen Song, Jiani Chen, Bo Jiang, Naifa Liu. 2016: Variation in egg and clutch size of the Black Redstart (Phoenicurus ochruros) at the northeastern edge of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Avian Research, 7(1): 20. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-016-0055-0
Citation: Sen Song, Jiani Chen, Bo Jiang, Naifa Liu. 2016: Variation in egg and clutch size of the Black Redstart (Phoenicurus ochruros) at the northeastern edge of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Avian Research, 7(1): 20. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-016-0055-0

Variation in egg and clutch size of the Black Redstart (Phoenicurus ochruros) at the northeastern edge of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Naifa Liu, naifaliu@sohu.com

  • Received Date: 01 Aug 2016
  • Accepted Date: 17 Oct 2016
  • Available Online: 24 Apr 2022
  • Publish Date: 03 Nov 2016
  • Background 

    In birds, the trade-off between the quality and number of nestlings is one of the most important theories of the evolution of life history of birds, which is closely related with climate. We investigated variation in egg and clutch size of the Black Redstart (Phoenicurus ochruros) on the northeastern edge of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau in order to explore and test the relation between egg size and clutch size and the rules governing the variation in these two components with climate change.

    Methods 

    We monitored each located nest daily to determine the exact laying order of the eggs and measured their sizes. The variations in egg volume and clutch size between 2008 and 2009 were studied by independent sample t tests. The difference in egg volume in the sequence of the laying order was tested by Kendall's W test and we employed Pearson correlations to investigate the relation between egg size and laying order. All statistical analyses were performed with IBM SPSS Statistics, version 19.0

    Results 

    In 2008, the mean egg volume of the Black Redstart was 2.40 ± 0.20 cm3 (n = 50), and the mean clutch size 4.90 ± 0.57 (n = 11). In 2009, the mean egg volume and clutch size were 2.26 ± 0.18 cm3 (n = 74) and 5.20 ± 0.26 (n = 15) respectively. We found a significantly positive correlation between egg size and laying order (r = 0.397, p = 0.030), while egg size was strongly and negatively correlated with clutch size (r = -0.274, p = 0.002). Black Redstarts tend to lay smaller eggs but a larger clutch in a brood in a resource-rich year, whereas larger eggs but smaller clutches are produced in a harsh year.

    Conclusions 

    The Black Redstart adopted a "brood survival strategy" to ensure that more offspring could survive. The Black Redstart' trade-off in egg volume and clutch size would guarantee that it will gain maximum benefit in any case.

  • Australia is home to one of the most diverse groups of parasitic cuckoos in the world, ranging from one of the world's smallest cuckoos, the Little Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites minutillus, 17 g, Fig. 1, Brooker and Brooker, 1989) to the enormous Channel-billed Cuckoo (Scythrops novaehollandiae), which, at 610 g, is the world's largest parasitic cuckoo (Fig. 2, Brooker and Brooker, 1989). Overall, eleven species of cuckoo belonging to five genera occur in Australia (Table 1), although one of these, the Oriental Cuckoo (Cuculus optatus), does not breed in Australia and will not be discussed further.

    Figure  1.  A little Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites minutillus), one of the world's smallest cuckoos (photo by John Grant)
    Figure  2.  A Channel-billed Cuckoo (Scythrops novaehollandiae), the largest parasitic cuckoo in the world (photo by Adam Jenkins)
    Table  1.  Australian cuckoos and their major hosts. Sources: Brooker and Brooker (1989), Erritzøe et al. (2012), webpage: lesmikebrooker.com/hosts.htm.
    Cuckoo Major hosts
    Pallid Cuckoo
    (Cacomantis pallidus)
    Red Wattlebird (Anthochaera carunculata), Yellow-throated Miner (Manorina flavigula), Lichenostomus spp., Black-headed Honeyeater (Melithreptus affinis)
    Fan-tailed Cuckoo
    (Cacomantis flabelliformis)
    White-browed Scrubwren (Sericornis frontalis), Brown Thornbill (Acanthiza pusilla), Inland Thornbill (Acanthiza apicalis)
    Brush Cuckoo
    (Cacomantis variolosus)
    Ramsayornis spp., Scarlet Robin (Petroica boodang), Leaden Flycatcher (Myiagra rubecula), Grey Fantail (Rhipidura fuligonosa)
    Chestnut-breasted Cuckoo
    (Cacomantis castaneiventris)
    Large-billed Scrubwren (Sericornis magnirostra), Tropical Scrubwren (Sericornis beccarii), Lovely Fairy-wren (Malurus amabilis)
    Black-eared Cuckoo
    (Chalcites osculans)
    Redthroat (Pyrrholaemus brunneus), Speckled Warbler (Chthonicola sagittata)
    Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites basalis) Fairy-wrens (Malurus spp.)
    Shining Bronze-cuckoo
    (Chalcites lucidus)
    Thornbills (Acanthiza spp.)
    Little Bronze-cuckoo
    (Chalcites minutillus)
    Gerygones (Gerygone spp.)
    Pacific Koel
    (Eudynamis scolopacea)
    Red Wattlebird (Anthochaera carunculata), Philemon spp., Magpie-lark (Grallina cyanoleuca), Figbird (Sphecotheres viridis)
    Channel-billed Cuckoo
    (Scythrops novaehollandiae)
    Pied Currawong (Strepera graculina), Corvus spp.
    Oriental cuckoo
    (Cuculus optatus
    Non-breeding vagrant
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The Australian cuckoos belong to the family Cuculinae, the Old World parasitic cuckoos. In all, there are 54 species belonging to 12 genera in the Cuculinae, distributed across Europe, Africa, Asia and Australasia (Davies, 2000). None of the five genera in Australia is endemic. The large Channel-billed Cuckoo is the only member of its genus and it occurs in Australia, New Guinea and Indonesia (Higgins, 1999). The Koels (Eudynamys spp.) are large cuckoos (120–360 g) that occur in Asia and Australasia. The medium-sized Cuculus cuckoos (52–150 g) are distributed throughout Europe, Africa, Asia and Australia. The Cacomantis cuckoos are smaller (22–44 g) and occur in Asia, New Guinea and Australia. The Chalcites cuckoos are the smallest cuckoos (17–35 g) and occur in Asia and Australasia (Davies, 2000).

    Parasitic cuckoos lay their eggs in the nests of other bird species. The female typically removes one of the host eggs and lays a single egg in the nest of the host. Thereafter, the female cuckoo abandons all interest in her offspring and the task of rearing the young cuckoo is borne entirely by the hosts (Fig. 3). In Australia, all except the Channel-billed Cuckoo (Scythrops novaehollandiae) are evicting species, meaning that the cuckoo chick evicts the host eggs or chicks from the nest soon after hatching (Fig. 4). Channel-billed Cuckoo chicks are reared alongside the chicks of their corvid hosts, although host young rarely survive to fledging (Higgins, 1999).

    Figure  3.  A fledgling Pallid Cuckoo (Cuculus pallidus) receiving a feed from its foster parent, a White-plumed Honeyeater (Lichenostomus penicillatus) (photo by Julian Robinson)
    Figure  4.  A Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites basalis) chick shows the 'push up' posture used to evict host eggs and chicks from the nest (photo by Michelle Hall)

    Some cuckoos are specialists and parasitize only a single host species, but the Australian cuckoos all parasitize more than one host. Brooker and Brooker (1989) conducted an exhaustive survey of the hosts of Australian cuckoos and this remains the most comprehensive and detailed examination of cuckoo parasitism in Australia. The most commonly-used, successful hosts were identified as 'major hosts'. The Brookers' survey revealed that most Australian cuckoos target different major hosts (Table 1). The only exceptions were the Fan-tailed Cuckoo (Cacomantis flabelliformis) and the Shining Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites lucidus) which shared two of the same major hosts.

    Several species of cuckoo are known to destroy the nests of hosts during late incubation or chick rearing (reviewed in Davies, 2000). This forces the host to renest, providing a ready supply of host nests at the right stage for the cuckoo to lay in. Only the female cuckoo destroys host nests, indicating that this is a strategy to increase parasitism success, rather than a simple predation event. In Australia, this behavior has been observed in the Shining Bronze-cuckoo (Morris and Catchpole, 1978) and the Fan-tailed Cuckoo (Guppy et al., unpublished data). There is also circumstantial evidence of this behavior in Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo, because predation rates were significantly higher in weeks when the cuckoos were laying than at other times (Brooker and Brooker, 1996).

    Few Australian cuckoos have been observed in the act of laying their eggs in host nests. Exceptions are Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites basalis), the Shining Bronze-cuckoo, and the Black-eared Cuckoo (Chalcites osculans), all of which laid their eggs in just a few seconds (Brooker et al., 1988; Higgins, 1999). The Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoos laid after the host female had laid her own eggs and laying was very rapid, ranging from 1.5 to 5.3 s (Brooker et al., 1988). Rapid laying reduces the chances that the host will detect the cuckoo and launch defenses such as mobbing of the cuckoo (Fig. 5, Langmore et al., 2012), abandonment of the nest (Langmore et al., 2003), or abandonment of the cuckoo chick (Langmore et al., 2009a).

    Figure  5.  Mobbing by Superb Fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus) of a Shining Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites lucidus) mounted specimen (photo by William Feeney)

    In the Asian Koel (Eudynamis scolopacea), a close relative of the Pacific Koel (E. orientalis) in Australia, collaboration between the male and female has been observed during egg laying (Lamba, 1966). The male flies to the host nest first, inducing the hosts to attack it, then lures them away allowing the female to access the nest and lay her egg. It is not known whether this behavior also occurs in the Pacific Koel in Australia.

    Many cuckoos around the world have evolved egg mimicry; eggs that mimic the pattern and color of the eggs of their host (Kilner, 2006; Stoddard and Stevens, 2011). This reduces the likelihood that the cuckoo egg will be rejected by the host (Spottiswoode and Stevens, 2010). However, parasitism of more than one host species creates a problem for the cuckoo, if different hosts lay different egg types. Australian cuckoos have evolved several ingenious means of fooling their hosts through egg morphology. Some species, such as Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo, lay a single egg type that is a good match of the eggs of both its major hosts, Fairywrens (Malurus spp.) (Fig. 6; Langmore et al., 2003; Langmore and Kilner, 2009), and its secondary hosts, thornbills (Acanthiza spp.). Other species have evolved polymorphic egg types, each of which resembles the egg of a different host. For example, the Brush Cuckoo (Cacomantis variolosus) lays three egg types, each of which matches its major host in a particular region of its distribution (Beruldsen, 2003). Similarly, the Pallid Cuckoo (Cacomantis pallidus), which primarily parasitizes honeyeaters, has evolved multiple egg types, each of which is a close match of the egg of a different host (Starling et al., 2006). However, the color differences between these host-specific egg types are so subtle that they had not been detected by human observation, and the use of reflectance spectometry was needed to quantify their color and differentiate between them (Starling et al., 2006).

    Figure  6.  A Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites basalis) egg (below) with two eggs of its host, a Superb Fairy-wren (Malurus cyaneus) (photo by Naomi Langmore)

    Rather than relying on egg mimicry, the Shining Bronze-cuckoo and Little Bronze-cuckoo have evolved an alternative disguise for their eggs. They lay dark brown or olive-green eggs that look quite unlike the eggs of their hosts (Fig. 7). The eggs are so thickly coated with dark pigment that the pigment can be wiped off a freshly laid egg. These cuckoos lay their eggs in dark, dome-shaped nests (Fig. 8) and the color and luminance of the eggs are indistinguishable to a bird's eye from those of the nest lining inside the dark nest, effectively rendering the eggs invisible to the host (Langmore et al., 2009b). Rejection of cuckoo eggs by the hosts of these cuckoos is virtually unknown (Gill, 1983; Brooker and Brooker, 1989; Langmore et al., 2005, 2009).

    Figure  7.  A triple-parasitized Large-billed Gerygone (Gerygone magnirostris) clutch from Cairns, showing the host egg (top) and three Little Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites minutillus) eggs (photo by Golo Maurer)
    Figure  8.  A Little Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites minutillus) chick in the dark, dome-shaped nest of its host, a Mangrove Gerygone (Gerygone levigaster) (photo by Naomi Langmore)

    Although dark, dome-shaped nests constrain cuckoo egg recognition via visual cues, hosts could still use tactile cues to detect an unusually sized egg. The Superb Fairy-wren hosts of Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo rarely reject an oddly coloured egg, but they are more likely to desert a clutch of eggs containing an egg larger than their own (Langmore et al., 2003). This has selected for a small egg relative to the cuckoo's body mass in Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo (Krüger and Davies, 2004). Many parasitic cuckoo species have also evolved unusually strong eggshells as adaptations to parasitism, including several Australian species (Picman and Pribil, 1997).

    The chicks of most cuckoo species, including most Australian cuckoos, look quite unlike the host chicks. There has been no selection for chick mimicry because in general hosts do not recognize and reject chicks that look different from their own. However, several hosts of the Australian Bronze-cuckoos (Chalcites spp.) are unusual in that they reject cuckoo chicks, rather than cuckoo eggs (Langmore et al., 2003; Sato et al., 2010; Tokue and Ueda, 2010). This may be a consequence of the poor visibility inside their dark nests, which constrains detection of foreign eggs (Langmore et al., 2005, 2009b). In response to rejection by hosts, Bronze-cuckoo chicks have evolved to be striking visual and vocal mimics of the young of their major hosts (Fig. 9, Langmore et al., 2008, 2011) and non-mimetic nestlings suffer a survival cost (Langmore et al., 2003). Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo is the most generalist of these cuckoos, and parasitizes a range of different host species (Table 1). This cuckoo faces the problem of how to mimic the young of several distinct species. It has evolved two solutions to this problem. First, to mimic the begging calls of different host young, the cuckoo produces the call of its primary host as the default call soon after hatching. However, if it is in the nest of a secondary host it rapidly modifies its begging call over several days until it becomes indistinguishable from the calls of the host young (Langmore et al., 2008). This is a particularly impressive feat given that the cuckoo chick evicts the host young before hatching and never hears their calls. It seems likely that the calls are refined through reinforcement by host parents, specifically by selective provisioning in response to more accurately mimetic calls (Langmore et al., 2008). This solves the problem of how to prevent detection of the cuckoo chick by hosts through vocal cues. However the cuckoo still faces the problem of how to mimic the appearance of host young of several different species. The hosts of Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo produce chicks that range in skin colour from pink to grey to black. This appears to have selected for imperfect mimicry of several different host species in the cuckoo chick, which has evolved two-tone coloration. The chick has a grey head, pink upper back and grey lower back (Fig. 9, bottom panel, Langmore et al., 2011). This two-tone coloration probably allows the cuckoo to partially resemble host young, perhaps thereby reducing the probability of rejection by hosts. This cuckoo has evolved a 'jack of all trades' strategy, being an imperfect mimic of several genera rather than a specialist mimic of few closelyrelated species like the other Bronze-cuckoos.

    Figure  9.  Newborn Bronze-cuckoo chicks (left) are visual mimics of their hosts (right). Top: Little Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites minutillus) and Large-billed Gerygone (Gerygone magnirostris). Middle: Shining Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites lucidus) and Yellow-rumped Thornbill (Acanthiza chrysorrhoa, below) and Buff-rumped Thornbill (Acanthiza reguloides, above). Bottom: Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites basalis) and Superb Fairy-wren (Malurus cyaneus) (photos by Naomi Langmore, Golo Maurer).

    Although there have been many fascinating discoveries about Australian cuckoos and the tricks they have evolved to fool their hosts, there is still much to discover. For example, how do hosts of the Little Bronze-cuckoo distinguish the cuckoo chick from their own young when mimicry of host young by the cuckoo is so accurate? Have the cryptic eggs of Bronze-cuckoos evolved to prevent rejection by hosts or by other female cuckoos that parasitize the same nest? Why do not Channel-billed Cuckoo chicks evict the host young from the nest like other Australian cuckoos? These and other questions will stimulate research for many years to come.

    NEL was supported by an Australian Research Council Australian Research Fellowship. I thank William Feeney, John Grant, Michelle Hall, Golo Maurer and Julian Robinson for providing photos, Wei Liang for inviting this article, and two anonymous reviewers for commenting on the manuscript.

  • Amat JA, Fraga RM, Arroyo GM. Intraclutch egg-size variation and offspring survival in the Kentish Plover Charadrius alexandrinus. Ibis. 2001;143:17-23.
    Both C, Visser ME. The effect of climate change on the correlation between avian life-history traits. Glob Change Biol. 2005;11:1606-13.
    Christians JK. Avian egg size: variation within species and inflexibility within individuals. Biol Rev. 2002;77:1-26.
    Clark AB, Wilson DS. Avian breeding adaptations: hatching asynchrony, brood reduction, and nest failure. Q Rev Biol. 1981;56:253-77.
    Cody ML. A general theory of clutch size. Evolution. 1966;20:174-84.
    Coulson JC. Egg size and shape in the Kittiwake and their use in estimating age composition of populations. Proc Zool Soc Lond. 1963;140:211-27.
    Crick HQP. The impact of climate change on birds. Ibis. 2004;146(Suppl 1):48-56.
    Desrochers A, Magrath RD. Age-specific fecundity in European Blackbirds (Turdus merula): individual and population trends. Auk. 1993;110:255-62.
    Dolenec Z. Egg dimensions variation in relation to the laying order in Black Redstart (Phoenicurus ochruros Gmelin, 1774) in NW Croatia. Belg J Zool. 2006;136:257-8.
    Du B, Zhao QS, Liu CJ, Guan MM, Liu NF. Giant Babaxes mix brood reduction and brood survival strategies. J Ornithol. 2012;153:611-9.
    Du B, Liu CJ, Yang M, Bao SJ, Guan MM, Liu NF. Horned larks on the Tibetan Plateau adjust the breeding strategy according to the seasonal changes in the risk of nest predation and food availability. J Avian Biol. 2014;45:466-74.
    Fox CW, Czesak ME. Evolutionary ecology of progeny size in Arthropods. Annu Rev Entomol. 2000;45:341-69.
    Hargitai R, Török J, Tóth L, Hegyi G, Rosivall B, Szigeti B, Szöllősi E. Effects of environmental conditions and parental quality on inter- and intraclutch egg-size variation in the Collared Flycatcher (Ficedula albicolis). Auk. 2005;122:509-22.
    Hill DA. Laying date, clutch size and egg size of the Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) and Tufted Duck (Aythya fuligula). Ibis. 1984;126:484-95.
    Högstedt G. Evolution of clutch size in birds: adaptive variation in relation to territory quality. Science. 1980;210:1148-50.
    Hőrak P, Mänd R, Ots I, Leivits A. Egg size in Great Tit Parus major: individual, habitat and geographic differences. Ornis Fenn. 1995;72:97-114.
    Hoyt DF. Practical methods of estimating volume and fresh weight of bird eggs. Auk. 1979;96:73-7.
    Lack D. The significance of clutch-size, Part Ⅰ and Part Ⅱ. Ibis. 1947;89:302-52.
    Lack D. The significance of clutch size, Part Ⅲ. Ibis. 1948;90:25-45.
    Lack D. The natural regulation of animal numbers. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1954.
    Lack D, Lack E. The breeding biology of the Swift Apus apus. Ibis. 1951;93:501-46.
    Liu NF, Ma CY. Gahai-Zecha National Nature Reserve. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing Press; 1997.
    Lu X, Ma XH, Fan LQ. Nesting and cooperative breeding behaviours of a high-altitude babbler, Tibetan Babax Babax koslowi. Acta Ornithol. 2007;42:181-5.
    Lu X, Gong GH, Zeng XH. Reproductive ecology of browncheeked laughing thrushes (Garrulax benrici) in Tibet. J Field Ornithol. 2008;79:152-8.
    Lu X, Yu T, Liang W, Yang C. Comparative breeding ecology of two white-bellied redstart populations at different altitudes. J Field Ornithol. 2010;81:167-75.
    Martin TE. Food as a limit on breeding birds: a life-history perspective. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1987;18:453-87.
    Murphy TM. Breeding patterns of Eastern Phoebes in Kansas: adaptive strategies or physiological constraint? Auk. 1994;111:617-33.
    Murton RK, Westwood NJ, Isaacson AJ. Factors affecting egg-weight, body weight and moult of the Wood Pigeon Columba palumbus. Ibis. 1974;116:52-73.
    Newton I. Population Limitation in Birds. London: Academic Press; 1998.
    Oppliger A, Christe P, Richner H. Clutch size and malarial parasites in female great tites. Behav Ecol. 1997;8:148-52.
    Simith CC, Fretwell SD. The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am Nat. 1974;108:499-506.
    Slagsvold T. Clutch size variation in passerine birds: the nest predation hypothesis. Oecologia. 1982;54:159-69.
    Slagsvold T, Sandvik J, Rofstad G, Lorensten Ö, Husky M. On the adaptive value of intraclutch egg-size variations in birds. Auk. 1984;101:685-97.
    Smith HG, Ohlsson T, Wettermark KJ. Adaptive significance of egg size in the European Starling: experimental tests. Ecology. 1995;76:1-7.
    Stenseth NC, Mysterud A, Ottersen G, Hurrell JW, Chan KS, Lima M. Ecological effects of climate fluctuations. Science. 2002;297:1292-6.
    Tinbergen JM, Daan S. Family planning in the Great Tit (Parus major): optimal clutch size as integration of parent and offspring fitness. Behavior. 1990;114:161-90.
    Viñuela J. Opposing selective pressures on hatching asynchrony: egg viability, brood reduction, and nestling growth. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2000;48:333-43.
    Williams TD. Intraspecific variation in egg size and egg composition in birds: effects on offspring fitness. Biol Rev. 1994;68:35-59.
    Winkler DW, Wallin K. Offspring size and number: a life history model linking effort per offspring and total effort. Am Nat. 1987;129:708-20.
    Zhang XA, Zhao L, Liu ZH, Li LX. Manipulating brood size experiments of two species passerine birds-testing Lack's hypothesis. Acta Ecol Sin. 2003;23:657-64.
    Zhao L, Li LX, Zhang XA. Effects of hatching behavior on offspring quality in two species passerines. Zool Res. 2002a;23(1):25-30.
    Zhao L, Zhang XA, Li MC. Effects on nestling growth by brood manipulation in two passerine birds. Chin J Zool. 2002b;37(3):6-8.
  • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. Morteza Banisaffar, Afshin Alizadeh Shabani. Factors influencing nest site selection of the Laughing Dove (Spilopelia senegalensis) in an urban area in Karaj, Iran. Ornis Hungarica, 2024, 32(2): 117. DOI:10.2478/orhu-2024-0026
    2. Nilgün Yapıcı, Ali Erdoğan. The expansive Laughing Dove (Spilopelia senegalensis), an all-year breeder in southern Turkey. Zoology in the Middle East, 2023, 69(1): 1. DOI:10.1080/09397140.2023.2172861
    3. Foued Hamza, Asma Kahli, Mohammed Almalki, et al. Distance from industrial complex, urban area cover, and habitat structure combine to predict richness of breeding birds in southeastern Tunisian oases. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29(22): 33191. DOI:10.1007/s11356-021-18051-8
    4. Emily L Weiser. Fully accounting for nest age reduces bias when quantifying nest survival. Ornithological Applications, 2021, 123(3) DOI:10.1093/ornithapp/duab030
    5. Foued Hamza, Saâd Hanane. The effect of microhabitat features, anthropogenic pressure and spatial structure on bird diversity in southern Tunisian agroecosystems. Annals of Applied Biology, 2021, 179(2): 195. DOI:10.1111/aab.12690
    6. Daniel F. Perrella, Paulo V. Q. Zima, Mercival R. Francisco. Nest Site Selection Along Forest-Streams by Two Forest-Dwelling Neotropical Passerines. Acta Ornithologica, 2021, 55(2) DOI:10.3161/00016454AO2020.55.2.005
    7. Nasrine Saâd, Saâd Hanane, Kamilia Farhi, et al. Nest Age as Predictor of Nest Survival in Three Sympatric Dove Species Breeding in a Mediterranean Arid Agroecosystem. Ardea, 2020, 108(2) DOI:10.5253/arde.v108i2.a5

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (447) PDF downloads (16) Cited by(7)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return