Name | Sequence | Source |
L 14841 | 5′-CCATCCAACATCTCAGCCATGATGAAA-3′ | Kocher et al. 1989 |
H 15149 | 5′-TGCAGCCCCTCAGAATGATATTTGTCCTCA-3′ | Kocher et al. 1989 |
Citation: | Arne MOKSNES, Frode FOSSØY, Eivin RØSKAFT, Bård G. STOKKE. 2013: Reviewing 30 years of studies on the Common Cuckoo: accumulated knowledge and future perspectives. Avian Research, 4(1): 3-14. DOI: 10.5122/cbirds.2013.0001 |
In Europe, eggs of the Common Cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) have been found in more than 125 different host species. However, very few species are frequently parasitized. The Cuckoo is divided into several distinct races termed gentes. Females of each gens specialize in parasitizing a particular host species. More than 20 such gentes are recognized in Europe. Each female Cuckoo lays eggs of constant appearance. Most gentes can be separated based on their distinct egg types, which in many cases mimic those of their hosts. Different gentes may occur in sympatry or may be separated geographically. Some gentes may occur in restricted parts of the host's distribution area. These patterns raise some fundamental questions like: Why are some passerine species preferred as hosts while others are not? Why does a host population consist of individuals either accepting or rejecting Cuckoo eggs? Why is there marked variation in egg rejection behavior between various host populations? How distinct and host-specialized are Cuckoo gentes? These questions are discussed in relation to existing knowledge and future perspectives.
In avian brood parasitism, interaction between a parasite and its host could lead to a co-evolutionary process called arms race, in which evolutionary progress on one side provokes a further response on the other side (Rothstein and Robinson, 1998). The Common Cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) parasitizes more than 100 species of hosts and has evolved more than 20 different kinds of egg phenotypes (Payne, 2005). These usually lay mimetic eggs, which often evolve in improved mimicry under selection pressure of host rejections (Davies, 2000; Yang et al., 2010a). There are up to 17 species of cuckoo species in China (Zheng, 2011; Yang et al., 2012a). Many breed in sympatry, such as the Common Cuckoo, the Himalayan Cuckoo (Cuculus saturatus), the Oriental Cuckoo (C. optatus), the Indian Cuckoo (C. micropterus) and the Lesser Cuckoo (C. poliocephalus) (Yang et al., 2012a). In contrast, only one Cuculus species occurs in Europe. Therefore, there is a potential risk of mis-identification of cuckoo nestlings, especially for the Cuculus species, in a multiple-cuckoo system. Even within a fine-scale study area, several cuckoo species co-occur belonging to the same Cuculus genus. This situation also poses a potential risk in that one host could be utilized by more than one parasite species, or one host parasitized by the same cuckoo species but with polymorphic eggs (Yang et al., 2010a). In this study we demonstrate a practical criterion to identify cuckoo nestlings (Cuculus spp.) in the field. Distinct morphological characteristics of cuckoo nestlings are summarized from our long-term studies and we established a molecular phylogenetic tree of Cuculus species to confirm our empirical results.
This study was conducted in the Kuankuoshui Nature Reserve, Guizhou Province in south-western China (28°10′N, 107°10′E) during the period from April to July 2004–2011. The study site is situated in a subtropical moist broadleaf and mixed forest, interspersed with abandoned tea plantations, shrub areas and open fields used as cattle pastures. Four Cuculus species, the Common Cuckoo, the Himalayan Cuckoo, the Lesser Cuckoo and the Indian Cuckoo co-occur in our study site (Yang et al., 2010a, 2010b, 2011, 2012a, 2012b). The first three species breed in a sympatric highland area while the Indian Cuckoo breeds in the lowlands.
Nests of all potential cuckoo hosts were found by systematically searching all typical and potential nest sites and by monitoring the activities of host adults throughout the breeding season. Date of the first eggs laid, egg color, clutch size and occurrence of cuckoo parasitism were recorded and distinct characteristics of different cuckoo nestlings were summarized. Blood samples from cuckoo nestlings were collected late in the brooding period and used for DNA extraction; polymerase cycling assembly (PCA) and sequencing were conducted in the State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol of Sun Yat-sen University. DNA segments from cytochrome b (referred to as cyt b) genes were amplified by using the primer sequences presented in Table 1. Molecular phylogenetic trees were established in MEGA 4.1 by using Neighbor-Joining methods. Another sympatric cuckoo species, the Large Hawk-cuckoo (Hierococcyx sparverioides), whose nestlings are easy to identify (Yang et al., 2012b), was treated as an outgroup for phylogenetic tree construction.
Name | Sequence | Source |
L 14841 | 5′-CCATCCAACATCTCAGCCATGATGAAA-3′ | Kocher et al. 1989 |
H 15149 | 5′-TGCAGCCCCTCAGAATGATATTTGTCCTCA-3′ | Kocher et al. 1989 |
According to our observations and summary of morphological traits, two important and distinct characteristics of cuckoo nestlings can be accepted for reliable species identification. First, the gape color pattern is an apparent characteristic for identification of early stage nestlings, whose skins are naked without plumage. In the Himalayan Cuckoo nestlings (n = 3), two triangular patches on the palate adjoin the cutting edges of the upper mandible; these appeared when the nestlings were four days old and became darker with age and growth (Fig. 1). These black patches on the gapes are absent in other Cuculus nestlings, except for the Oriental Cuckoo, formerly regarded as the same species as the Himalayan Cuckoo (Payne, 2005). Secondly, the plumage color and pattern were treated as important characteristics for identification of cuckoo nestlings at a later stage. Common Cuckoo nestlings (n = 8) have white, narrow tips of feathers on their upper backs and wings, which are obscure in the Himalayan Cuckoo and were absent in nestlings of the Lesser Cuckoo (n = 3) (Fig. 2). The Indian Cuckoo nestlings (n = 4) had wide, large scaled white feather edges, covering their entire head and most of their upper back and wings (Fig. 2). Furthermore, white nape spots only appeared in Common Cuckoo nestlings.
The molecular phylogenetic tree supported our morphological classification of cuckoo nestlings (Fig. 3). Three hosts were found to be used by the Common Cuckoo, i.e., the Daurian Redstart (Phoenicurus auroreus), the White Wagtail (Motacilla alba) and the Ashy-throated Parrotbill (Paradoxomis alphonsianus). As well, the Himalayan Cuckoo, the Indian Cuckoo and the Lesser Cuckoo parasitized Blyth's Leaf Warbler (Phylloscopus reguloides), the Black Drongo (Dicrurus macrocercus) and the Brownish-flanked Bush Warbler (Cettia fortipes), respectively.
In the present study, we demonstrated a practical criterion to identify cuckoo nestlings (Cuculus spp.) in the field. Distinct morphological characteristics of cuckoo nestlings were further confirmed by the molecular phylogenetic tree of these Cuculus species. The cuckoo-host system is among the most studied brood parasite systems, but it should be pointed out that the cuckoos of Asia are much less well known, with the exception of the Japanese cuckoos (Rothstein and Robinson, 1998; Payne, 2005). China has the largest and most abundant occurrence of cuckoo species in Asia, with many of them co-occur in sympatric areas (Yang et al., 2012a). Studies of such multiple-cuckoo systems are needed to reveal host use and competition among sympatric cuckoo species, which can help us to improve our understanding of co-evolutionary processes. However, species identification of cuckoo nestlings is quite difficult in China, especially that of Cuculus species. Even within a fine-scale study area, several cuckoo species co-occur, belonging to the same Cuculus genus. This situation also poses a potential risk that one host could be utilized by more than one parasite species, or one host parasitized by the same cuckoo species but with polymorphic eggs (Yang et al., 2010a). We have provided therefore both a reliable criterion for recognizing morphological traits and a molecular analysis to distinguish different cuckoo nestling species in the field. To our knowledge, this is the first report of species identification of Cuculus nestlings through molecular analysis.
We are very grateful to the anonymous referee for constructive comments on an earlier draft of this paper. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31071938, 31101646), the Key Project of the Chinese Ministry of Education (No. 212136) and by the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-10-0111). We would like to thank the Forestry Department of Guizhou Province and the Kuankuoshui National Nature Reserve for support and permission to carry out this study. We also thank Prof. Zhengwang Zhang for providing photographs and sequences of the Indian Cuckoo, as well as Xinliang Guo, Longwu Wang, Xiao Xu, Na Wang and Tongping Su for assistance with the field work.
Tables(1)
Name | Sequence | Source |
L 14841 | 5′-CCATCCAACATCTCAGCCATGATGAAA-3′ | Kocher et al. 1989 |
H 15149 | 5′-TGCAGCCCCTCAGAATGATATTTGTCCTCA-3′ | Kocher et al. 1989 |