| Citation: |
Rustam Pshegusov, Victoria Chadaeva. 2023: Modelling the nesting-habitat of threatened vulture species in the caucasus: An ecosystem approach to formalising environmental factors in species distribution models. Avian Research, 14(1): 100131. DOI: 10.1016/j.avrs.2023.100131
|
Abiotic factors play an important role in species localisation, but biotic and anthropogenic predictors must also be considered in distribution modelling for models to be biologically meaningful. In this study, we formalised the biotic predictors of nesting sites for four threatened Caucasian vultures by including species distribution models (wild ungulates, nesting tree species) as biotic layers in the vulture Maxent models. Maxent was applied in the R dismo package and the best set of the model parameters were defined in the R ENMeval package. Performance metrics were continuous Boyce index, Akaike's information criterion, the area under receiver operating curve and true skill statistics. We also calculated and evaluated the null models. Kernel density estimation method was applied to assess the overlap of vulture ecological niches in the environmental space. The accessibility of anthropogenic food resources was estimated using the Path Distance measure that considers elevation gradient. The availability of pine forests (Scots Pine) and wild ungulates (Alpine Chamois and Caucasian Goat) contributed the most (29.6% and 34.3%) to Cinereous Vulture (Aegypius monachus) nesting site model. Wild ungulate distribution also contributed significantly (about 46%) to the Bearded Vulture (Gypaetus barbatus) model. This scavenger nests in the highlands of the Caucasus at a minimum distance of 5–10 km from anthropogenic facilities. In contrast, livestock as a food source was most important in colony distribution of Griffon Vulture (Gyps fulvus). The contribution of distances to settlements and agricultural facilities to the model was 45%. The optimal distance from Egyptian Vulture (Neophron percnopterus) nesting sites to settlements was only 3–10 km, to livestock facilities no more than 15 km with the factor contribution of about 57%. Excluding the wild ungulate availability, the ecological niches of studied vultures overlapped significantly. Despite similar foraging and nesting requirements, Caucasian vultures are not pronounced nesting and trophic competitors due to the abundance of nesting sites, anthropogenic food sources and successful niche sharing.
The most dominant global threat to natural forests and their biodiversity is land-cover change, which has negative impacts on both species persistence and ecosystem functions (Fahrig 2003; Tylianakis et al. 2008; Pogson 2015; Holyoak and Heath 2016). In Asia, many natural forests have been transformed to farmlands by local residents, resulting in several natural patches of forest within highly human-disturbed habitats (Foley et al. 2005; Haddad et al. 2015). Therefore, it is important to understand the effects of land-cover change on plant regeneration in these disturbed habitats (Cordeiro and Howe 2003; Markl et al. 2012; Bai et al. 2017).
In general, seed-dispersal interactions between animals and fleshy-fruited plants form the basis of plant regeneration, which is one of the key factors influencing the persistence of plant communities (Janzen 1970). In various disturbed habitats, the seed dispersal pattern of frugivorous birds directly reflects their functional traits, especially their morphological traits (Larsen et al. 2005; Suding et al. 2008; Schupp et al. 2010; Bregman et al. 2016; Farwig et al. 2017). As many ecologists predicted, the body size of birds can be used to estimate the ecological role of birds in seed removal and can affect the degree of species-specific interactions in seed-dispersal distance (Perez-Méndez et al. 2015; Bregman et al. 2016; Muñoz et al. 2017). Large-bodied birds can transport more seeds than small birds, and have the potential to facilitate seed dispersal among forest fragments (patches) owing to their longer dispersal distance (Spiegel and Nathan 2007; Wotton and Kelly 2012; Mueller et al. 2014; Li et al. 2017). However, increasing scientific evidence supports the concept that seed dispersal could be promoted by several bird functional traits (Schleuning et al. 2015; Muñoz et al. 2017). Thus, enhanced seed dispersal can be affected by not only bird morphological traits (e.g. body length, weight, wing length, tail length, etc.), but also by bird behavioural traits (e.g. foraging behaviour, flight behaviour, etc.) (Bregman et al. 2016; Farwig et al. 2017). Owing to the inherent difficulty of monitoring multiple bird functional traits in different disturbed habitats, empirical evidence supporting the extent of the role of bird functional traits in seed dispersal mutualism remains limited.
In the present study, we assessed the contributions of bird functional traits (behavioural traits: food habit, foraging pattern, foraging frequency, and habitat specialisation; morphological traits: weight, body length, wing length, and tail length) to both seed removal patterns and seed dispersal distance of an endangered and native tree species, Chinese yew (Taxus chinensis (Rehder and E.H. Wilson) Rehder), across farmland, patchy habitat, and natural habitat. We hypothesised that the seed removal patterns of these endangered trees vary across disturbed habitats and are strongly affected by bird foraging (behavioural) functional traits. In addition, we also tested how the bird flight (morphological) functional traits influence the seed dispersal distance across disturbed habitats.
Taxus chinensis is a dioecious, wind-pollinated species, distributed in evergreen broadleaf forests in China. Each year, female plants bear axillary cones, which develop into fleshy arils (commonly referred to as "fruits"), each containing a single seed, in autumn; an average Chinese yew tree bears more than 4000 fruits annually (Li et al. 2015, 2017).
We selected three populations of T. chinensis in the villages of Chongtou and Guihe, which are located in the southern experimental area of the Meihua Mountain National Nature Reserve (MMNNR), in southwest Fujian Province, China (25°15′-25°35′N, 116°45′-116°57′E). The composition of the three populations are as follows: (1) a farmland population from Guihe that consists of two remnant mother trees in Capsicum annuum farmland (northeast slope; slope angle 15°; altitude 1180 m; tree coverage 5%); (2) a natural population from Guihe that consists of ten mother trees scattered in the evergreen broadleaf forest (northwest slope; slope angle 32°; altitude 1178 m; tree coverage 80%); and (3) a patchy population, located in Chongtou, that contains the largest wild T. chinensis population in China (approximately 490 adults). This patch of T. chinensis is interlaced with patches of farmland, bamboo, mixed bamboo, and broadleaf trees to form a fragmented landscape (northeast slope; slope angle 27°; altitude 1218 m; tree coverage 70%) (Li et al. 2015).
To quantify how birds visited fruiting trees and how many seeds were removed from T. chinensis plants across the different sites, field observations were performed during the fruiting season (late October to early December) in all three habitats (farmland and natural habitat: 2012 and 2013; patchy habitat: 2011 and 2012). Observation points were located on opposing mountain slopes, and observations were made using a field scope (Leica 70, Leica Camera AG, Wetzlar, Germany) at distances ranging from 50 to 100 m. Each site was observed from 06:30 to 18:30 on observation days, for a total of 720 h of observation. During the observations, fruit-eating birds were identified and counted, and the foraging pattern (pecking, swallowing) and number of fruits they removed was recorded (i.e., fruits were either ingested on the tree or carried in the beak upon leaving the tree). From these records, we compared the number of seeds removed and frequency of foraging by frugivorous birds across the three habitats (number of fruits per visit × foraging frequencies) (Breitbach et al. 2010).
To quantify how far T. chinensis seeds were transported by birds, post-foraging movement behaviours of birds were studied in all three habitats (farmland, patchy, and natural). Each potential disperser leaving a given tree was tracked in a session that ended once visual contact was lost or if the focal bird could no longer be distinguished from its conspecifics. For each tracking session, the perching position of each bird was recorded every 30 s after it left the study tree, and observers noted nearby characteristic landmarks for subsequent verification of field distance estimates using a map. To estimate the real seed dispersal distance, we collected seeds that had been regurgitated by birds, and had fallen on the forest floor, the morning after an observation by finding the marked perching positions (regurgitated seeds refer to cleaned seeds without any aril that had been totally digested by birds) (Pan et al. 2016). We also assumed that the position in which the bird perched was a sufficient proxy for evaluating seed dispersal distance, as previously described (Breitbach et al. 2010). From these records, we compared seed dispersal distances across the three habitat types.
To quantify how bird functional traits affected seed dispersal patterns, we selected eight functional traits that are functionally related to the foraging and post-foraging flight behaviours of frugivorous birds (Moermond and Denslow 1985) as follows: foraging behaviours (food habit, foraging pattern, foraging frequency, weight, and length) and flight performance behaviours (wing length, tail length, weight, length, and habitat specialisation). All morphological traits were measured using two male and two female museum specimens of each bird species from local populations. In addition, data on food habits (frugivorous, omnivorous) and habitat specialisation (generalist, specialist) were compiled from A Field Guide to the Birds of China (MacKinnon et al. 2000). For the analyses, we used the mean measurement of each trait for each species. All morphological traits were log-transformed to approximate normality.
To quantify how bird functional traits affected seed removal, we first used a machine-learning algorithm (random forest model) to plot the partial effects of food habit, foraging pattern, foraging frequency, weight, body length, site, and year against the number of seeds removed (R package Random Forest) (Breiman 2001). Moreover, we also used the random forest model to plot the partial effects of bird flight traits (wing length, tail length, weight, body length, and habitat specialisation) on seed dispersal distance (R package Random Forest) (Breiman 2001).
During the fruiting season, 5106 seeds (2012: 2341 seeds; 2013: 2765 seeds), 1091 seeds (2012: 719 seeds; 2013: 372 seeds), and 10, 277 seeds (2011: 4704 seeds; 2012: 5573 seeds) were removed by 15, 13, and 22 bird species in the farmland, natural habitat, and patchy habitat, respectively. More seeds were removed from the patchy habitat than from the other two habitats. The most common forager at the farmland site was the Collared Finchbill (Spizixos semitorques) (2012: 42 foraging events, 714 seeds; 2013: 40 foraging events, 690 seeds), whereas the Orange-bellied Leafbird (Chloropsis hardwickii) (2012: 23 foraging events, 184 seeds; 2013: 15 foraging events, 165 seeds) and Black Bulbul (Hypsipetes leucocephalus) (2011: 233 foraging events, 3728 seeds; 2012: 253 foraging events, 4048 seeds) were the most common foragers in the natural and patchy habitats, respectively. These birds were also the most common dispersers for T. chinensis, as determined by rates of seed removal from the three habitat types.
In addition, seeds were removed and taken to greater distances from the farmland than from the other two habitats. Dispersal distance (farmland: 65 m; natural habitat: 50 m; patchy habitat: 60 m) and mean dispersal distance (farmland: 15.2 m; natural habitat: 8.1 m; patchy habitat: 13.8 m) for seeds from the farmland site were greater than those of the other two habitats (Fig. 1).
Considering the contributions of bird foraging traits to seed removal, the results of the random forest analysis showed 85.74% of seed removal data could be explained by eight variables: bird foraging frequency, weight, body length, food habit, site, year, habitat specialisation and foraging pattern. Only three variables (bird foraging frequency, food habit and site) significantly affected seed removal patterns. The results showed a clear positive association between bird foraging frequency and number of seeds removed (Fig. 2a). The contribution by frugivores to seed removal was higher than that by omnivorous birds (Fig. 2b), and more seeds were removed from the farmland site (Fig. 2c).
During field-based observations, a total of 687 seed dispersal distances were confirmed. Considering the contribution of bird flight traits to seed dispersal distance, 22.45% of seed dispersal distance could be explained by six variables (wing length, tail length, weight, body length, site and habitat specialisation). Three variables (bird tail length, wing length, and site) significantly affected seed removal patterns. The results of the random forest analysis demonstrated clear positive associations of bird tail (Fig. 3a) and wing length (Fig. 3b) with seed dispersal distance. The dispersal distance from the three habitat types differed, where the longest dispersal distances were observed at both the patchy habitat and the farmland site (Fig. 3c).
To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to find that T. chinensis trees have the ability to form seed dispersal mutualisms with local birds across different disturbed habitats. As a consequence of these mutualisms, more seeds were removed by birds from the patchy habitat than from the other two habitats (Fig. 1). The number of seeds removed increased with bird foraging frequency (Fig. 2a). Moreover, the dispersal distances from the three habitats differed, where the longest dispersal distances were observed at both the patchy habitat and the farmland site (Fig. 3c). Seed dispersal distance increased with bird tail and wing length (Fig. 3a, b).
There are several possible reasons to explain why more T. chinensis seeds were removed by birds at the patchy habitat, mostly involving the habitat features of the patchy habitat. First, the community structure of the patchy habitat was simple, which could attract more birds to forage and remove the seeds (Breitbach et al. 2010). In addition, the co-fruiting plants found in the patchy habitat may have helped to attract birds to the vicinity of the focal trees (Schupp et al. 2010). Moreover, the longer dispersal distance observed at the farmland site (Fig. 1) could have been related to the lack of perching trees in this disturbed habitat. As a consequence, birds had to fly farther to find trees to perch on (Cody 1985).
Foraging behavioural traits strongly affected bird seed removal patterns across the three habitats (Fig. 2), which could be explained by both bird and plant traits (Farwig et al. 2017). For the bird perspective, it has been shown that medium-sized birds are not as sensitive to disturbance as large-bodied birds (Moore and Swihart 2007; Breitbach et al. 2010), as the remaining forests still provide adequate shelter and food for the persistence of medium-sized birds in disturbed habitats. For the plant perspective, plant traits of T. chinensis also determined the persistence of birds in disturbed habitats, thus affecting the foraging behaviour of birds (Farwig et al. 2017; Muñoz et al. 2017). Crop size, fruit size, and height of T. chinensis could be good advertisements that attract birds (crop size: 4000 per mother tree; fruit weight: 7 g; height: 25‒45 m) (Jordano and Schupp 2000; Martinez et al. 2008; Herrera and García 2009; Li et al. 2017). As a consequence, most of the bird species preferred to forage the "fruit" of this plant, and therefore chose the plant as their main food, which in turn determined the seed removal rate across the three habitats. Thus, the characteristics of the yew tree are a better predictor of seed removal rate in different habitats.
Furthermore, our results showed that seed dispersal distance increased with bird tail and wing length in all three different habitats (Fig. 3). Wing length played an important role in determining the dispersal distance of the birds in the present study, and was an indicator of the role of the birds' flight ability in dispersal distance, as the birds' flight ability has been shown to increase with increasing wing length (Muñoz et al. 2017). Thus, wing length exerts a positive effect on seed dispersal distance. Our results also highlighted the interaction between bird tail length and seed dispersal distance. Tail length affects the ability to steer, and thus the forest specialisation of the birds. Birds with long tail length have been shown to exhibit both high tolerance to forest adaptation and high potential for flight (Fahrig 2007; Li et al. 2017), thus resulting in their long dispersal distances in all habitats.
Our results highlight the importance of the functional traits of birds in the seed dispersal patterns of endangered trees across disturbed habitats. Bird behavioural traits could determine the ecological role of the species in seed removal, while morphological traits of birds may affect the level of the species-specific contribution to seed dispersal distance across disturbed habitats.
NL, ZW and ZL designed the study. NL performed data collection. NL, and XL conducted all statistical analyses. All authors contributed to the writing and editing of the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
We thank Zhongwei Zheng and Tianshi Xiong for their contributions in the field work.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
The datasets used in the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Not applicable.
The experiments comply with the current laws of China in which they were performed.
|
Abuladze, A., Kandaurov, A., Bukhnikashvili, A., Natradze, I., Kokhia, M., Bekoshvili, D., et al., 2011. The analysis of recorded causes of death of adult birds of prey and owls in Georgia in 1973–2011. In: Abuladze, A. (Ed.), The Birds of Prey and Owls of Caucasus. Institute of Zoology of the Ilia State University, Tbilisi, pp. 5–7.
|
|
Adhikari, D., Singh, P., Tiwary, R., Barik, S., Barik, K., 2019. Modelling the environmental niche and potential distribution of Magnolia campbellii Hook. f. & Thomson for its conservation in the Indian Eastern Himalaya. In: Bikarma, S. (Ed.), Plants of Commercial Values. New India Publishing Agency, New Delhi, pp. 79–88.
|
|
Aghababyan, K., Ananyan, V., 2011. Assessment of the conservation status of Egyptian Vulture (Neophron percnopterus) in Armenia. In: Abuladze, A. (Ed.), The Birds of Prey and Owls of Caucasus. Institute of Zoology of the Ilia State University, Tbilisi, p. 7.
|
|
Akbayev, I.M., Tkachenko, I.V., 2001. On nesting parasitism among birds of prey. In: Kurochkin, E.N., Rakhimov, I.I. (Eds.), Current Issues in the Study and Conservation of Birds in Eastern Europe and North Asia. Matbugat Yorta Publishing House, Kazan, p. 30.
|
|
Arkumarev, V., Dobrev, D., Stamenov, A., Angelova, V., Delchev, A., Dyulgerska, V., et al., 2020. Occurrences of the cinereous vulture (Aegypius monachus) in the eastern rhodopes, Bulgaria. Ecol. Balk. 12, 53–63.
|
|
Belik, V.P., 2004. Aegypius monachus in the North Caucasus. Strepet 2, 68–76.
|
|
Belik, V.P., 2012. Distribution and number of the Black Vulture (Aegyptus monachus, Falconiformes) in the Northern Caucasus. Russ. J. Zool. 91, 347–354.
|
|
Belik, V.P., 2014. Raptor population dynamics in the North Caucasus: the results of 150 years of research. In: Belik, V.P. (Ed.), Birds of Prey in the North Caucasus and Adjacent Regions: Distribution, Ecology, Population Dynamics, Conservation. Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, pp. 83–126.
|
|
Belik, V.P., Vetrov, V.V., Milobog, Y.V., 2011. Birds of prey of Dagestan from 2009 expedition research. In: Abuladze, A. (Ed.), The Birds of Prey and Owls of Caucasus. Institute of Zoology of the Ilia State University, Tbilisi, pp. 10–13.
|
|
Belik, V.P., Nasrulaev, N.I., 2019. To the avifauna of Inner Dagestan arid hollows: Orot basin on the Avarskoe Koisu river. In: Belik, V.P. (Ed.), Sustainable Development of Protected Areas. Natural Ornithological Park in the Imereti Lowlands, Sochi, pp. 63–81.
|
|
Belik, V.P., Nasrulaev, N.I., 2021. New species in the avifauna of the Botlikh depression (Inner Dagestan). Russ. Ornithol. J. 30, 3527–3555.
|
|
Belik, V.P., Telpov, V.A., Komarov, Y.E., Pshegusov, R.H., 2019. Gyps fulvus in the central Caucasus. Russ. Ornithol. J. 28, 2535–2539.
|
|
Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R., 2002. Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, second ed. Springer-Verlag, New York.
|
|
Daget, P., Ahdali, L., David, P., 1988. Mediterranean bioclimate and its variation in the Palaearctic region. In: Specht, R.L. (Ed.), Mediterranean-Type Ecosystems, A Data Source Book. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 139–148.
|
|
Edisherashvili, G., 2011. Birds of prey and owls of the Shida Kartli region, Georgia. In: Abuladze, A. (Ed.), The Birds of Prey and Owls of Caucasus. Institute of Zoology of the Ilia State University, Tbilisi, pp. 16–18.
|
|
García-Ripollés, C., López-López, P., García-López, F., Aguilar, J.M., Verdejo, J., 2005. Modelling nesting habitat preferences of eurasian griffon vulture Gyps fulvus in eastern iberian Peninsula. ARDEOLA 52, 287–304.
|
|
Ilyukh, M.P., 2017. Gyps fulvus and Aegypius monachus in stavropol. Russ. Ornithol. J. 26, 3–9.
|
|
Ilyukh, M.P., Shevtsov, A.S., 2021. Gyps fulvus – a new nesting species in Stavropol Krai. Russ. Ornithol. J. 30, 3113–3118.
|
|
Karavaev, A.A., Potapenko, Y.Y., 2018. Additional information on nesting of Aegypius monachus on the rocky mountain range of the northern Caucasus. Russ. Ornithol. J. 27, 2307–2308.
|
|
Karavaev, A.A., Vitovich, O.A., 2021. Birds of Karachay-Cherkessia: Gypaetus barbatus. Russ. Ornithol. J. 30, 3409–3429.
|
|
Kirazlı, C., 2016. The impact of some spatial factors on disturbance and reaction distances on nest occupation by the near threatened Cinereous Vulture (Aegypius monachus). N. West. J. Zool. 12, 304–313.
|
|
Komarov, Y.E., 2017. On the breeding biology of Gypaetus barbatus in the mountains of North Ossetia. Russ. Ornithol. J. 26, 1967–1971.
|
|
Le, S., Josse, J., Husson, F., 2008. FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis. J. Stat. Software 25, 1–18.
|
|
McCoy, J., Johnston, K., Kopp, S., Borup, B., Willison, J., Payne, B., 2001. Using ArcGIS Spatial Analyst. ESRI Press, Redlands.
|
|
Mishra, S., Kumar, D., Kanaujia, A., 2018. A preliminary study on nest site selection by Egyptian Vultures in Uttar Pradesh, India. Biol. Forum Int. J. 10, 90–95.
|
|
Mishra, S., Kumar, D., Sinha, D., Kanaujia, A., 2021. Competitive interactions within and between species in scavenger avian species: a case study of Egyptian Vulture in Uttar Pradesh, India. In: Recent Trends in Environment, Climate Change, Physical and Life Sciences, pp. 99–102.
|
|
Mnatsekanov, R.A., 2022. Aegypius monachus in north Ossetia. Russ. Ornithol. J. 31, 2417–2433.
|
|
Mnatsekanov, R.A., Tilba, P.A., 1998. Current status of scavenger foraging in the Western Caucasus. In: III Conference on Birds of Prey in Eastern Europe and North Asia. SGU, Stavropol, pp. 83–84.
|
|
Muscarella, R., Galante, P.J., Soley-Guardia, M., Boria, R.A., Kass, J.M., Uriarte, M., et al., 2014. ENMeval: an R package for conducting spatially independent evaluations and estimating optimal model complexity for MaxEnt ecological niche models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 1198–1205.
|
|
Parfenov, E.A., 2019. Nesting of Gyps fulvus in the vicinity of Pyatigorsk. Russ. Ornithol. J. 28, 5054–5061.
|
|
Perevozov, A.G., 2020. Aegypius monachus nesting in the Caucasus nature reserve. Russ. Ornithol. J. 29, 4739–4741.
|
|
Qin, A., Liu, B., Guo, Q., Bussmann, R.W., Ma, F., Jian, Z., et al., 2017. Maxent modeling for predicting impacts of climate change on the potential distribution of Thuja sutchuenensis Franch., an extremely endangered conifer from southwestern China. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 10, 139–146.
|
|
Red Data Book of Russian Federation (Plants and Fungi). 2018. Tovarishchestvo nauchnykh izdaniy KMK, Moscow.
|
|
Riley, S.J., Degloria, S.D., Elliot, S.D., 1999. A Terrain Ruggedness Index that quantifies topographic heterogeneity. Intermt. J. Sci. 5, 23–27.
|
|
Shevtsov, A.S., Ilyukh, M.P., 2022. Neophron percnopterus nesting in the vicinity of Kislovodsk. Russ. Ornithol. J. 31, 3215–3231.
|
|
Soberón, J., Peterson, A., 2005. Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species' distributional areas. Biodivers. Inf. 2, 1–10.
|
|
Stoynov, E., Peshev, H., Stoyanov, G., Ivanov, I., Parvanov, D., Grozdanov, A., 2019. Past and present state of the Cinereous Vulture (Aegypius monachus) and feasibility analysis for its reintroduction in Bulgaria. Ecol. Balk. 2019, 30–43.
|
|
Tilba, P.A., 2014. Status of populations of rare species of birds of prey in the south-eastern part of the Russian Black Sea coast. In: Belik, V.P. (Ed.), Birds of Prey in the North Caucasus and Adjacent Regions: Distribution, Ecology, Population Dynamics, Conservation. Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, pp. 177–192.
|
|
Wickham, H., 2009. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York.
|
|
Yamac, E., 2007. Roosting tree selection of Cinereous Vulture in breeding season in Turkey. Podoces 2, 30–36.
|
| 1. | Guohai Wang, Yang Huang, Wei Yao, et al. Structure and characteristics of the plant-frugivore bird network from the Guilin Botanical Garden. PeerJ, 2023, 11: e15028. DOI:10.7717/peerj.15028 |
Figures(6) / Tables(6)
DownLoad:
Email Alerts
RSS Feeds