Sean P. Roach, Luke C. McLean, Jeff W. MacLeod, Leslie S. Phillmore. 2024: Seasonal changes in Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus) song syntax. Avian Research, 15(1): 100171. DOI: 10.1016/j.avrs.2024.100171
Citation: Sean P. Roach, Luke C. McLean, Jeff W. MacLeod, Leslie S. Phillmore. 2024: Seasonal changes in Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus) song syntax. Avian Research, 15(1): 100171. DOI: 10.1016/j.avrs.2024.100171

Seasonal changes in Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus) song syntax

Funds: 

Research was partly funded by an NSERC Discovery Grant received by LS Phillmore and a UNB University Research Fund grant received by SP Roach 

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    E-mail address: sroach1@unb.ca (S.P. Roach)

  • Received Date: 30 Aug 2023
  • Rev Recd Date: 29 Feb 2024
  • Accepted Date: 02 Mar 2024
  • Available Online: 11 Jul 2024
  • Publish Date: 14 Mar 2024
  • In many songbird species, birdsong features phonological syntax, meaning that the units within their vocal sequences are ordered in a non-random way that adheres to a rule. While such syntactical patterns have been richly described in many species, comparatively little is known about how those patterns contribute to song achieving its important functions. For each of song's main functions, territorial defense and mate attraction, evidence of a role for syntax is limited. One species for which syntax has been thoroughly described is the Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus), which presents song types from their repertoires in a semi-predictable order and, in doing so, rapidly cycle up and down the frequency spectrum. The objective of the present study was to explore the importance of song syntax in the Hermit Thrush through a within-subject examination of how measures of syntax, such as the predictability of song type order within song sequences, shift over the breeding season. We hypothesized that, if such syntactical characteristics are important to breeding behaviour, they would be most prominent at the start of the breeding season when activity associated with territory establishment and mate attraction is most intense. Analysis revealed that, as predicted, the rigidness of song type ordering within sequences was highest at the start of the season and declined thereafter. That song type sequences were most predictable at the vitally important early part of the breeding season fit our hypothesis that this aspect of song syntax is important to song's functions related to territory establishment and/or mate attraction. Future work will clarify whether that role relates to one of song's two main functions or serves song transmission in some broader way.

  • Australia is home to one of the most diverse groups of parasitic cuckoos in the world, ranging from one of the world's smallest cuckoos, the Little Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites minutillus, 17 g, Fig. 1, Brooker and Brooker, 1989) to the enormous Channel-billed Cuckoo (Scythrops novaehollandiae), which, at 610 g, is the world's largest parasitic cuckoo (Fig. 2, Brooker and Brooker, 1989). Overall, eleven species of cuckoo belonging to five genera occur in Australia (Table 1), although one of these, the Oriental Cuckoo (Cuculus optatus), does not breed in Australia and will not be discussed further.

    Figure  1.  A little Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites minutillus), one of the world's smallest cuckoos (photo by John Grant)
    Figure  2.  A Channel-billed Cuckoo (Scythrops novaehollandiae), the largest parasitic cuckoo in the world (photo by Adam Jenkins)
    Table  1.  Australian cuckoos and their major hosts. Sources: Brooker and Brooker (1989), Erritzøe et al. (2012), webpage: lesmikebrooker.com/hosts.htm.
    Cuckoo Major hosts
    Pallid Cuckoo
    (Cacomantis pallidus)
    Red Wattlebird (Anthochaera carunculata), Yellow-throated Miner (Manorina flavigula), Lichenostomus spp., Black-headed Honeyeater (Melithreptus affinis)
    Fan-tailed Cuckoo
    (Cacomantis flabelliformis)
    White-browed Scrubwren (Sericornis frontalis), Brown Thornbill (Acanthiza pusilla), Inland Thornbill (Acanthiza apicalis)
    Brush Cuckoo
    (Cacomantis variolosus)
    Ramsayornis spp., Scarlet Robin (Petroica boodang), Leaden Flycatcher (Myiagra rubecula), Grey Fantail (Rhipidura fuligonosa)
    Chestnut-breasted Cuckoo
    (Cacomantis castaneiventris)
    Large-billed Scrubwren (Sericornis magnirostra), Tropical Scrubwren (Sericornis beccarii), Lovely Fairy-wren (Malurus amabilis)
    Black-eared Cuckoo
    (Chalcites osculans)
    Redthroat (Pyrrholaemus brunneus), Speckled Warbler (Chthonicola sagittata)
    Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites basalis) Fairy-wrens (Malurus spp.)
    Shining Bronze-cuckoo
    (Chalcites lucidus)
    Thornbills (Acanthiza spp.)
    Little Bronze-cuckoo
    (Chalcites minutillus)
    Gerygones (Gerygone spp.)
    Pacific Koel
    (Eudynamis scolopacea)
    Red Wattlebird (Anthochaera carunculata), Philemon spp., Magpie-lark (Grallina cyanoleuca), Figbird (Sphecotheres viridis)
    Channel-billed Cuckoo
    (Scythrops novaehollandiae)
    Pied Currawong (Strepera graculina), Corvus spp.
    Oriental cuckoo
    (Cuculus optatus
    Non-breeding vagrant
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The Australian cuckoos belong to the family Cuculinae, the Old World parasitic cuckoos. In all, there are 54 species belonging to 12 genera in the Cuculinae, distributed across Europe, Africa, Asia and Australasia (Davies, 2000). None of the five genera in Australia is endemic. The large Channel-billed Cuckoo is the only member of its genus and it occurs in Australia, New Guinea and Indonesia (Higgins, 1999). The Koels (Eudynamys spp.) are large cuckoos (120–360 g) that occur in Asia and Australasia. The medium-sized Cuculus cuckoos (52–150 g) are distributed throughout Europe, Africa, Asia and Australia. The Cacomantis cuckoos are smaller (22–44 g) and occur in Asia, New Guinea and Australia. The Chalcites cuckoos are the smallest cuckoos (17–35 g) and occur in Asia and Australasia (Davies, 2000).

    Parasitic cuckoos lay their eggs in the nests of other bird species. The female typically removes one of the host eggs and lays a single egg in the nest of the host. Thereafter, the female cuckoo abandons all interest in her offspring and the task of rearing the young cuckoo is borne entirely by the hosts (Fig. 3). In Australia, all except the Channel-billed Cuckoo (Scythrops novaehollandiae) are evicting species, meaning that the cuckoo chick evicts the host eggs or chicks from the nest soon after hatching (Fig. 4). Channel-billed Cuckoo chicks are reared alongside the chicks of their corvid hosts, although host young rarely survive to fledging (Higgins, 1999).

    Figure  3.  A fledgling Pallid Cuckoo (Cuculus pallidus) receiving a feed from its foster parent, a White-plumed Honeyeater (Lichenostomus penicillatus) (photo by Julian Robinson)
    Figure  4.  A Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites basalis) chick shows the 'push up' posture used to evict host eggs and chicks from the nest (photo by Michelle Hall)

    Some cuckoos are specialists and parasitize only a single host species, but the Australian cuckoos all parasitize more than one host. Brooker and Brooker (1989) conducted an exhaustive survey of the hosts of Australian cuckoos and this remains the most comprehensive and detailed examination of cuckoo parasitism in Australia. The most commonly-used, successful hosts were identified as 'major hosts'. The Brookers' survey revealed that most Australian cuckoos target different major hosts (Table 1). The only exceptions were the Fan-tailed Cuckoo (Cacomantis flabelliformis) and the Shining Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites lucidus) which shared two of the same major hosts.

    Several species of cuckoo are known to destroy the nests of hosts during late incubation or chick rearing (reviewed in Davies, 2000). This forces the host to renest, providing a ready supply of host nests at the right stage for the cuckoo to lay in. Only the female cuckoo destroys host nests, indicating that this is a strategy to increase parasitism success, rather than a simple predation event. In Australia, this behavior has been observed in the Shining Bronze-cuckoo (Morris and Catchpole, 1978) and the Fan-tailed Cuckoo (Guppy et al., unpublished data). There is also circumstantial evidence of this behavior in Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo, because predation rates were significantly higher in weeks when the cuckoos were laying than at other times (Brooker and Brooker, 1996).

    Few Australian cuckoos have been observed in the act of laying their eggs in host nests. Exceptions are Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites basalis), the Shining Bronze-cuckoo, and the Black-eared Cuckoo (Chalcites osculans), all of which laid their eggs in just a few seconds (Brooker et al., 1988; Higgins, 1999). The Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoos laid after the host female had laid her own eggs and laying was very rapid, ranging from 1.5 to 5.3 s (Brooker et al., 1988). Rapid laying reduces the chances that the host will detect the cuckoo and launch defenses such as mobbing of the cuckoo (Fig. 5, Langmore et al., 2012), abandonment of the nest (Langmore et al., 2003), or abandonment of the cuckoo chick (Langmore et al., 2009a).

    Figure  5.  Mobbing by Superb Fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus) of a Shining Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites lucidus) mounted specimen (photo by William Feeney)

    In the Asian Koel (Eudynamis scolopacea), a close relative of the Pacific Koel (E. orientalis) in Australia, collaboration between the male and female has been observed during egg laying (Lamba, 1966). The male flies to the host nest first, inducing the hosts to attack it, then lures them away allowing the female to access the nest and lay her egg. It is not known whether this behavior also occurs in the Pacific Koel in Australia.

    Many cuckoos around the world have evolved egg mimicry; eggs that mimic the pattern and color of the eggs of their host (Kilner, 2006; Stoddard and Stevens, 2011). This reduces the likelihood that the cuckoo egg will be rejected by the host (Spottiswoode and Stevens, 2010). However, parasitism of more than one host species creates a problem for the cuckoo, if different hosts lay different egg types. Australian cuckoos have evolved several ingenious means of fooling their hosts through egg morphology. Some species, such as Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo, lay a single egg type that is a good match of the eggs of both its major hosts, Fairywrens (Malurus spp.) (Fig. 6; Langmore et al., 2003; Langmore and Kilner, 2009), and its secondary hosts, thornbills (Acanthiza spp.). Other species have evolved polymorphic egg types, each of which resembles the egg of a different host. For example, the Brush Cuckoo (Cacomantis variolosus) lays three egg types, each of which matches its major host in a particular region of its distribution (Beruldsen, 2003). Similarly, the Pallid Cuckoo (Cacomantis pallidus), which primarily parasitizes honeyeaters, has evolved multiple egg types, each of which is a close match of the egg of a different host (Starling et al., 2006). However, the color differences between these host-specific egg types are so subtle that they had not been detected by human observation, and the use of reflectance spectometry was needed to quantify their color and differentiate between them (Starling et al., 2006).

    Figure  6.  A Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites basalis) egg (below) with two eggs of its host, a Superb Fairy-wren (Malurus cyaneus) (photo by Naomi Langmore)

    Rather than relying on egg mimicry, the Shining Bronze-cuckoo and Little Bronze-cuckoo have evolved an alternative disguise for their eggs. They lay dark brown or olive-green eggs that look quite unlike the eggs of their hosts (Fig. 7). The eggs are so thickly coated with dark pigment that the pigment can be wiped off a freshly laid egg. These cuckoos lay their eggs in dark, dome-shaped nests (Fig. 8) and the color and luminance of the eggs are indistinguishable to a bird's eye from those of the nest lining inside the dark nest, effectively rendering the eggs invisible to the host (Langmore et al., 2009b). Rejection of cuckoo eggs by the hosts of these cuckoos is virtually unknown (Gill, 1983; Brooker and Brooker, 1989; Langmore et al., 2005, 2009).

    Figure  7.  A triple-parasitized Large-billed Gerygone (Gerygone magnirostris) clutch from Cairns, showing the host egg (top) and three Little Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites minutillus) eggs (photo by Golo Maurer)
    Figure  8.  A Little Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites minutillus) chick in the dark, dome-shaped nest of its host, a Mangrove Gerygone (Gerygone levigaster) (photo by Naomi Langmore)

    Although dark, dome-shaped nests constrain cuckoo egg recognition via visual cues, hosts could still use tactile cues to detect an unusually sized egg. The Superb Fairy-wren hosts of Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo rarely reject an oddly coloured egg, but they are more likely to desert a clutch of eggs containing an egg larger than their own (Langmore et al., 2003). This has selected for a small egg relative to the cuckoo's body mass in Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo (Krüger and Davies, 2004). Many parasitic cuckoo species have also evolved unusually strong eggshells as adaptations to parasitism, including several Australian species (Picman and Pribil, 1997).

    The chicks of most cuckoo species, including most Australian cuckoos, look quite unlike the host chicks. There has been no selection for chick mimicry because in general hosts do not recognize and reject chicks that look different from their own. However, several hosts of the Australian Bronze-cuckoos (Chalcites spp.) are unusual in that they reject cuckoo chicks, rather than cuckoo eggs (Langmore et al., 2003; Sato et al., 2010; Tokue and Ueda, 2010). This may be a consequence of the poor visibility inside their dark nests, which constrains detection of foreign eggs (Langmore et al., 2005, 2009b). In response to rejection by hosts, Bronze-cuckoo chicks have evolved to be striking visual and vocal mimics of the young of their major hosts (Fig. 9, Langmore et al., 2008, 2011) and non-mimetic nestlings suffer a survival cost (Langmore et al., 2003). Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo is the most generalist of these cuckoos, and parasitizes a range of different host species (Table 1). This cuckoo faces the problem of how to mimic the young of several distinct species. It has evolved two solutions to this problem. First, to mimic the begging calls of different host young, the cuckoo produces the call of its primary host as the default call soon after hatching. However, if it is in the nest of a secondary host it rapidly modifies its begging call over several days until it becomes indistinguishable from the calls of the host young (Langmore et al., 2008). This is a particularly impressive feat given that the cuckoo chick evicts the host young before hatching and never hears their calls. It seems likely that the calls are refined through reinforcement by host parents, specifically by selective provisioning in response to more accurately mimetic calls (Langmore et al., 2008). This solves the problem of how to prevent detection of the cuckoo chick by hosts through vocal cues. However the cuckoo still faces the problem of how to mimic the appearance of host young of several different species. The hosts of Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo produce chicks that range in skin colour from pink to grey to black. This appears to have selected for imperfect mimicry of several different host species in the cuckoo chick, which has evolved two-tone coloration. The chick has a grey head, pink upper back and grey lower back (Fig. 9, bottom panel, Langmore et al., 2011). This two-tone coloration probably allows the cuckoo to partially resemble host young, perhaps thereby reducing the probability of rejection by hosts. This cuckoo has evolved a 'jack of all trades' strategy, being an imperfect mimic of several genera rather than a specialist mimic of few closelyrelated species like the other Bronze-cuckoos.

    Figure  9.  Newborn Bronze-cuckoo chicks (left) are visual mimics of their hosts (right). Top: Little Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites minutillus) and Large-billed Gerygone (Gerygone magnirostris). Middle: Shining Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites lucidus) and Yellow-rumped Thornbill (Acanthiza chrysorrhoa, below) and Buff-rumped Thornbill (Acanthiza reguloides, above). Bottom: Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites basalis) and Superb Fairy-wren (Malurus cyaneus) (photos by Naomi Langmore, Golo Maurer).

    Although there have been many fascinating discoveries about Australian cuckoos and the tricks they have evolved to fool their hosts, there is still much to discover. For example, how do hosts of the Little Bronze-cuckoo distinguish the cuckoo chick from their own young when mimicry of host young by the cuckoo is so accurate? Have the cryptic eggs of Bronze-cuckoos evolved to prevent rejection by hosts or by other female cuckoos that parasitize the same nest? Why do not Channel-billed Cuckoo chicks evict the host young from the nest like other Australian cuckoos? These and other questions will stimulate research for many years to come.

    NEL was supported by an Australian Research Council Australian Research Fellowship. I thank William Feeney, John Grant, Michelle Hall, Golo Maurer and Julian Robinson for providing photos, Wei Liang for inviting this article, and two anonymous reviewers for commenting on the manuscript.

  • Alward, B.A., Balthazart, J., Ball, G.F., 2017. Dissociable effects on birdsong of androgen signaling in cortex-like brain regions of canaries. J. Neurosci. 37, 8612–8624. .
    Alward, B.A., Cornil, C.A., Balthazart, J., Ball, G.F., 2018. The regulation of birdsong by testosterone: Multiple time-scales and multiple sites of action. Horm. Behav. 104, 32–40. .
    Annan, O., 1962. Sequence of migration, by sex, age, and species, of thrushes of the genus Hylocichla, through Chigago. Bird-banding 33, 130–137. .
    Ballentine, B., Badyaev, A., Hill, G.E., 2003. Changes in song complexity correspond to periods of female fertility in blue grosbeaks (Guiraca caerulea). Ethology 109, 55–66. .
    Ballentine, B., Hyman, J., Nowicki, S., 2004. Vocal performance influences female response to male bird song: an experimental test. Behav. Ecol. 15, 163–168. .
    Bartsch, C., Weiss, M., Kipper, S., 2015. Multiple song features are related to paternal effort in common nightingales. BMC Evol. Biol. 15, 115. .
    Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48. .
    Berwick, R.C., Okanoya, K., Beckers, G.J., Bolhuis, J.J., 2011. Songs to syntax: the linguistics of birdsong. Trends Cogn. Sci. 15, 113–121. .
    Brennan, C.L., Jones, A.W., 2016. Song structure and cadence of the Veery (Catharus fuscescens) in the Appalachian Mountains. Wilson J. Ornithol. 128, 75–85. .
    Briefer, E.F., Rybak, F., Aubin, T., 2013. Does true syntax or simple auditory object support the role of skylark song dialect? Anim. Behav. 86, 1131–1137. .
    Byers, B.E., Kroodsma, D.E., 2009. Female mate choice and songbird song repertoires. Anim. Behav. 77, 13–22. .
    Cardoso, G.C., Mota, P.G., 2004. Female serin (Serinus serinus) responses to song do not favour the predominant song syntax. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 16, 329–338. .
    Catchpole, C.K., Slater, P.J.B., 2008. Bird Song Biological Themes and Variations, second ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. doi: .
    Chew, S.J., Mello, C., Nottebohm, F., Jarvis, E., Vicario, D.S., 1995. Decrements in auditory responses to a repeated conspecific song are long-lasting and require two periods of protein synthesis in the songbird forebrain. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 3406–3410. .
    Ciaburri, I., Williams, H., 2019. Context-dependent variation of house finch song syntax. Anim. Behav. 147, 33–42.
    Dellinger, R., Wood, P.B., Jones, P.W., Donovan, T.M., 2020. Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus), version 1.0. In: Poole, A.F. (Ed. ), Birds of the World. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca. .
    DeMerchant, K., Roach, S.P., 2022. Vocal responses of Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus) males to territorial playback of conspecific song. Ibis 164, 793–799. .
    Dilger, W.C., 1956. Hostile behavior and reproductive isolating mechanisms in the avian genera Catharus and Hylocichla. Auk 73, 313–353. .
    Emlen, S.T., 1972. An experimental analysis of the parameters of bird song eliciting species recognition. Behaviour 41, 130–171. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1163/156853972X00248.
    Gabadinho, A., Ritschard, G., Müller, N., Studer, M., 2011. Analyzing and visualizing state sequences in R with TraMineR. J. Stat. Softw. 40, 1–37. .
    Gil, D., Slater, P.J., 2000. Song organisation and singing patterns of the willow warbler, Phylloscopus trochilus. Behaviour 137, 759–782. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4535737.
    Goymann, W., Landys, M.M., 2011. Testosterone and year-round territoriality in tropical and non-tropical songbirds. J. Avian Biol. 42, 485–489. .
    Hedley, R.W., 2016. Complexity, predictability and time homogeneity of syntax in the songs of Cassin's vireo (Vireo cassinii). PLoS One 11, e0150822. .
    Hedley, R.W., Denton, K.K., Weiss, R.E., 2017. Accounting for syntax in analyses of countersinging reveals hidden vocal dynamics in a songbird with a large repertoire. Anim. Behav. 131, 23–32. .
    Hiebert, S.M., Stoddard, P.K., Arcese, P., 1989. Repertoire size, territory acquisition and reproductive success in the song sparrow. Anim. Behav. 37, 266–273. .
    Holland, J., Dabelsteen, T., Paris, A.L., 2000. Coding in the song of the wren: importance of rhythmicity, syntax and element structure. Anim. Behav. 60, 463–470. .
    Ivanitskii, V.V., Marova, I.M., Antipov, V.A., 2017. Sequential organization in the song of thrush nightingale (Luscinia luscinia): clustering and sequential order of the song types. Bioacoustics 26, 199–215. .
    Jones, D.F., 2006. Voice-printing the Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus). Can. Acoust. 34, 14–15.
    Kao, M.H., Brainard, M.S., 2006. Lesions of an avian basal ganglia circuit prevent context-dependent changes to song variability. J. Neurophysiol. 96, 1441–1455. .
    Ketterson, E.D., Nolan Jr, V., Wolf, L., Ziegenfus, C., 1992. Testosterone and avian life histories: effects of experimentally elevated testosterone on behavior and correlates of fitness in the dark-eyed junco (Junco hyemalis). Am. Nat. 140, 980–999. .
    Kunc, H.P., Amrhein, V., Naguib, M., 2005. Acoustic features of song categories and their possible implications for communication in the common nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos). Behaviour 142, 1077–1091. .
    Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P.B., Christensen, R.H., 2017. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Stat. Softw. 82, 1–26. .
    Magoolagan, L., Mawby, P.J., Whitehead, F.A., Sharp, S.P., 2019. The structure and context of male and female song in White-throated Dippers. J. Ornith. 160, 195–205. .
    Marler, P., 1977. The structure of animal communication sounds. In: Bullock, T.H. (Ed. ), Recognition of Complex Acoustic Signals: Report of the Dahlem Workshop on Recognition of Complex Acoustic Signals. Abakon-Verlagsgesellschaft, Berlin, pp. 17–35.
    Marler, P., Peters, S., Ball, G.F., Dufty Jr, A.M., Wingfield, J.C., 1988. The role of sex steroids in the acquisition and production of birdsong. Nature 336, 770–772. .
    McLean, L.C., Roach, S.P., 2021. Markov dependencies in the song syntax of Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus). J. Ornithol. 162, 469–476. .
    Meitzen, J., Moore, I.T., Lent, K., Brenowitz, E.A., Perkel, D.J., 2007. Steroid hormones act transsynaptically within the forebrain to regulate neuronal phenotype and song stereotypy. J. Neurosci. 27, 12045–12057. .
    Mizuhara, T., Okanoya, K., 2020. Do songbirds hear songs syllable by syllable? Behav. Process. 174, 104089. .
    Nelson, D.A., Marler, P., 1989. Categorical perception of a natural stimulus continuum: birdsong. Science 244, 976–978. .
    Nesbitt, M., Soosaar, K., Roach, S., 2022. Responses of Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus) males to conspecific playback with typical and atypical syntactical patterns. Behav. Process. 203, 104764. .
    Otter, K., Ratcliffe, L., 1993. Changes in singing behavior of male black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus) following mate removal. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 33, 409–414. .
    Parris, K.M., Velik-Lord, M., North, J.M., 2009. Frogs call at a higher pitch in traffic noise. Ecol. Soc. 14, 25. .
    R Core Team, 2023. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
    Rivers, J.W., Kroodsma, D.E., 2000. Singing behavior of the Hermit Thrush. J. Field Ornithol. 71, 467–471. .
    Roach, S.P., Johnson, L., Phillmore, L.S., 2012. Repertoire composition and singing behaviour in two eastern populations of the Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus). Bioacoustics 21, 239–252. .
    Robinson, C.M., Creanza, N., 2019. Species-level repertoire size predicts a correlation between individual song elaboration and reproductive success. Ecol. Evol. 9, 8362–8377. .
    Scharff, C., Nottebohm, F., 1991. A comparative study of the behavioral deficits following lesions of various parts of the zebra finch song system: implications for vocal learning. J. Neurosci. 11, 2896–2913. .
    Searcy, W.A., 1992. Song repertoire and mate choice in birds. Am. Zool. 32, 71–80. .
    Searcy, W.A., Nowicki, S., Peters, S., 1999. Song types as fundamental units in vocal repertoires. Anim. Behav. 58, 37–44. .
    Searcy, W.A., Soha, J., Peters, S., Nowicki, S., 2022. Long-distance dependencies in birdsong syntax. Proc. R. Soc. B 289, 20212473. .
    Sossinka, R., Böhner, J., 1980. Song types in the zebra finch Poephila guttata castanotis. Z. Tierpsychol. 53, 123–132. .
    Stanley, C.Q., Walter, M.H., Venkatraman, M.X., Wilkinson, G.S., 2016. Insect noise avoidance in the dawn chorus of Neotropical birds. Anim. Behav. 112, 255–265. .
    Taylor, C.E., Brumley, J.T., Hedley, R.W., Cody, M.L., 2017. Sensitivity of California thrashers (Toxostoma redivivum) to song syntax. Bioacoustics 26, 259–270. .
    van Duyse, E., Pinxten, R., Eens, M., 2003. Seasonal fluctuations in plasma testosterone levels and diurnal song activity in free-living male great tits. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 134, 1–9. .
    Weiss, M., Hultsch, H., Adam, I., Scharff, C., Kipper, S., 2014. The use of network analysis to study complex animal communication systems: a study on nightingale song. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20140460. .
    Wingfield, J.C., Hahn, T.P., 1994. Testosterone and territorial behaviour in sedentary and migratory sparrows. Anim. Behav. 47, 77–89. .
  • Related Articles

Catalog

    Figures(3)  /  Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (22) PDF downloads (4) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return