Dimitar Demerdzhiev, Dobromir Dobrev, Georgi Popgeorgiev, Stoycho Stoychev. 2022: Landscape alteration affects the demography of an endangered avian predator by reducing the habitat quality. Avian Research, 13(1): 100030. DOI: 10.1016/j.avrs.2022.100030
Citation: Dimitar Demerdzhiev, Dobromir Dobrev, Georgi Popgeorgiev, Stoycho Stoychev. 2022: Landscape alteration affects the demography of an endangered avian predator by reducing the habitat quality. Avian Research, 13(1): 100030. DOI: 10.1016/j.avrs.2022.100030

Landscape alteration affects the demography of an endangered avian predator by reducing the habitat quality

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    E-mail address: dimitar.demerdzhiev@gmail.com (D. Demerdzhiev)

  • Received Date: 20 Sep 2021
  • Accepted Date: 22 Mar 2022
  • Available Online: 06 Jul 2022
  • Publish Date: 08 Apr 2022
  • Habitat transformation is identified as major threat to biodiversity loss globally, affecting threatened raptors. Changes in land use can alter the abundance and distribution of birds of prey by affecting habitat availability and quality. In this study, we used multivariate analyses to investigate the effect of habitat alteration on the demography of a declining Eastern Imperial Eagle (Aquila heliaca), making assumptions for future population trajectories. We used the Generalized Linear Mixed Models with Poisson distribution and Log link function, searching a relationship between the demographic parameters and the landscape structure and possible effects of fragmentation. In our study area, habitat change affected dramatically permanent grasslands, shrinking their availability. As we expected, the share of grasslands in eagles' territories significantly affected occupancy rate, but not productivity and breeding frequency. We found that occupancy rate decreased significantly, while productivity and breeding frequency showed no trend. Modeling the effect of habitat alteration on Eastern Imperial Eagle demography, we found out that territory quality was a more powerful factor driving the response of a top predator to the alteration of favorite foraging habitats. Only the habitat quality in source territories had a significant positive effect on eagle productivity. We found that simple rules to predict adverse agricultural impact on territory abandonment or breeding productivity of a top predator were not reliable. Our results could be used for planning conservation of other large territorial raptors, facing the same type of threat.

  • In sympatrical breeding, closely related bird species potentially compete for resources, including food, nest sites, song perches, and roost sites (Cody, 1969). This may result in interspecific territoriality and/or segregation in resource use. In addition, selection by predation may lead to maximizing the variance in nest sites of different species within avian communities (e.g., Martin, 1996). However, whether coexisting closely related species will converge or diverge in their traits has been a subject of debate (Murray, 1976). In addition, the most important studies attempting to demonstrate interspecific competition were performed on cavity nesters, where nest sites are a strongly limiting factor (Hill and Lein, 1989; Ye et al., 2019). Thus, more studies considering a range of open-nesting species are needed to resolve this issue.

    The Buffy Laughingthrush (Garrulax berthemyi) is a species endemic to central and southeastern China (Zheng, 2017). The Red-tailed Laughingthrush (Trochalopteron milnei) is sympatric with the Buffy Laughingthrush in our study site and is distributed in southern China, northern Burma, and Indochina (Collar et al., 1994; Zheng, 2017). To our knowledge, there is little available data on the natural history of these two species. The two laughingthrush species breed in sympatry and share similar habitats in the Kuankuoshui Nature Reserve. The objectives of our work were to: (1) find and describe the nests, eggs, nestlings, and breeding behavior of the Buffy Laughingthrush and Red-tailed Laughingthrush; (2) survey their breeding densities and predation rates; and (3) compare the breeding ecology of these two sympatric species.

    The study was performed in the Kuankuoshui Nature Reserve, Guizhou province, southwestern China (28°10ʹ N, 107°10ʹ E) from April to July 2005–2009. The annual average temperature there is 13.6 ​℃, and the average annual total precipitation is 1210 mm (Yang et al., 2020). The study site is situated in a subtropical moist broadleaf and mixed forest at an altitude of about 1500 m, and is interspersed with abandoned tea plantations, bamboo, and shrubby areas, and open fields used as cattle pastures. The breeding density for each of the two species was surveyed by the line transect method during the breeding season from 2005 to 2009. Five 100-m width sampling lines that covered the study site were arranged with a distance of 6 km for each line (Appendix Fig. S1). Every sampling line was surveyed five times (once each year) by walking at a speed of 1.5 km/h. Breeding density (number of pairs per km2) was averaged for the five yearly surveys.

    Nests were found by systematically searching all typical and potential nest sites and by monitoring the activities of adults throughout the breeding season. We monitored nests daily by recording nest-building activity, the date of the first egg, egg color, clutch size, and nest habitat, and also calculated the predation rate. Nest failure was assumed to be due to predation if remains of eggs or nestlings were found in or beneath nests or if the entire contents disappeared, and due to desertion if eggs or young were present but unattended. Nestlings were assumed to have fledged if they were at least 12 d old and nests were found empty and undisturbed on or shortly after the anticipated fledging date. Because of the remoteness of some nest sites from our campsite, not all nests were inspected regularly, and sample sizes varied for different breeding parameters. Moreover, sample sizes of nests varied among years due to differences in time spent in the field. We thus pooled data from different years.

    Egg size and mass were measured with an electronic caliper (precision 0.01 mm) and a portable electronic scale (precision 0.01 g), respectively, shortly after clutch completion or during early incubation. Egg volume was estimated by using the formula (0.51 ​× ​length ​× ​(width2)) of Hoyt (1979). The eggs were photographed in a standardized manner on a grey card using a Canon EOS 500D digital camera. When a nest was found during the incubation period, the eggs were floated to estimate the laying date (Hays and Lecroy, 1971). We also measured the nest size and nest height and estimated nest cover at 15 cm above the nest. Nest size and nest height above the ground were measured by a tape measure. Nest cover was visually estimated from 0% to 100%. Either Student's t-test or the χ2 test was used for comparing the nest parameters between Red-tailed Laughingthrush and Buffy Laughingthrush. All statistical analyses were carried out by using SPSS 16.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois). Data are presented as mean ​± ​SE (standard error), and the significance level is set to P ​ < ​0.05.

    Our results showed that mean breeding densities of the Buffy Laughingthrush and Red-tailed Laughingthrush were 17.6 pairs/km2 and 25.8 pairs/km2, respectively. A total of 12 Buffy Laughingthrush and 27 Red-tailed Laughingthrush nests were found (yearly sample sizes ​= ​5, 2, 2, 3, 0 and 6, 2, 3, 15, 1 in 2005–2009, respectively). The breeding time of these two laughingthrushes was from April to late July. The laying date of the first egg in Buffy and Red-tailed laughingthrushes was 3 May – 10 July and 1 May – 14 July, respectively. Buffy and Red-tailed Laughingthrushes built nests in bamboo or tree forests, with no significant interspecific differences in microhabitat choice or height of the nests above the ground (Table 1). However, the nest cover of the Buffy Laughingthrush was denser than that of the Red-tailed Laughingthrush (Table 1). Both laughingthrushes built cup-shaped nests out of bamboo or tree leaves, also adding some moss. The Buffy Laughingthrush used fibers or pine needles to line the nest cup, but the Red-tailed Laughingthrush used black fern roots. The nest size of Buffy Laughingthrushes was similar to that of Red-tailed Laughingthrushes in all dimensions except outer nest depth: Buffy Laughingthrush nest structures were higher than those of Red-tailed Laughingthrush nests (Table 1). The eggs of the two species did not differ significantly in size or mass (Table 1), but were dramatically different in coloration (Fig. 1). Buffy Laughingthrush eggs were plain blue, while those of the Red-tailed Laughingthrush were white with scarce maroon blotches (Fig. 1). In addition, the clutch sizes of the two laughingthrush species were also very similar (Table 1). Nest predation was the major cause of nest failure, taking a similar toll in both species (Table 1). The nestling gape pattern differed substantially between the two species (Fig. 1). The gape of Buffy Laughingthrush's nestlings was lemon-yellow. However, Red-tailed Laughingthrush nestlings had a conspicuous orange gape and were covered in golden-brown down on the head and the back (Fig. 1).

    Table  1.  Differences in breeding parameters between Buffy Laughingthrush and Red-tailed Laughingthrush.
    Parameters Red-tailed Laughingthrush Buffy Laughingthrush Statisticsa P
    Egg coloration White + brown spots Immaculate blue
    Clutch size 2.75 ± 0.25 (12) 3.78 ± 0.15 (9) – 3.24 0.004*
    Egg size (cm3) 6.87 ± 0.18 (12) 6.77 ± 0.21 (9) 0.38 0.709
    Cup diameter (cm) 8.62 ± 0.27 (6) 9.20 ± 0.38 (5) – 1.30 0.225
    Nest diameter (cm) 11.6 ± 2.13 (6) 13.4 ± 0.51 (5) – 0.75 0.472
    Cup depth (cm) 6.05 ± 0.28 (6) 4.90 ± 0.25 (5) 3.04 0.014*
    Nest depth (cm) 10.18 ± 0.26 (5) 10.60 ± 1.17 (5) – 0.35 0.735
    Nest height (m) 2.24 ± 0.16 (25) 2.37 ± 0.09 (12) – 0.54 0.594
    Nest cover (%) 58.95 ± 5.22 (19) 70.00 ± 6.57 (11) – 1.30 0.204
    Habitat (%) 93% bamboo, 7% tree (27) 17% shrub, 25% bamboo, 58% tree (12) 17.68ψ < 0.001*
    Predation rate (%) 57.14 (21) 40.00 (10) 0.80ψ 0.458
    Data are presented as means ± SE (sample size). a Comparisons were made using either Student's t-test or the Chi-square test (indicated by "ψ"). * Statistically significant (P < 0.05).
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure  1.  Nests, eggs, and nestlings (7 days old) of Buffy Laughingthrushes (upper row) and Red-tailed Laughingthrushes (lower row) in Kuankuoshui NR, southwestern China (Photographs by Canchao Yang).

    In the Buffy Laughingthrush, we found one case in which more than two adults fed the nestlings at the same nest. One adult brooded the nestlings while two others fed them. Furthermore, occasionally more than two birds were observed to be mobbing the observer in the vicinity of their nests. Our detailed comparison of two closely related and sympatric species of laughingthrush revealed few differences in their breeding ecology, but the nest cover, egg color, and nestling gape morphology were found to differ between the two species. Wallace (1889) hypothesized that the ancestral white egg has been retained by species whose nests are safe from predator attacks (cavity nesters), while species with more vulnerable nest sites are more likely to lay pigmented eggs. Blue-green egg coloration is thought to be camouflaging in forest environments where greenish light is filtered out by the canopy (Lack, 1968). Furthermore, the Buffy Laughingthrush and Red-tailed Laughingthrush laid blue and white eggs, respectively, and bred in similar habitats. However, Red-tailed Laughingthrushes chose nest sites significantly more concealed from above compared to Buffy Laughingthrushes, suggesting a possible explanation for differences in egg appearance of the two species. Predation rates in these two species were not significantly different, but this may have been due to the adjustment of nest site cover and egg color, or perhaps that the effect is slight, thus requiring larger samples to be detected. Finally, more than two adults of the Buffy Laughingthrush were observed feeding the nestlings in the same nest. This phenomenon indicated that cooperative breeding may exist in the population of Buffy Laughingthrush, but more data are needed to confirm this behavior.

    CY conceived and designed the study. CY and PY conducted the investigation in the field, analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. XY, GL and WL assisted the field work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Fieldwork was carried out under the permission from Kuankuoshui National Nature Reserve, China. Experimental procedures were in agreement with the Animal Research Ethics Committee of Hainan Provincial Education Centre for Ecology and Environment, Hainan Normal University (permit no. HNECEE-2011-001).

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    We thank the Forestry Department of Guizhou Province and Kuankuoshui National Nature Reserves for support and permission to carry out this study. Financial support has been provided by Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (320CXTD437 and 2019RC189 to CY), and Hainan Provincial Innovative Research Program for Graduates (Hyb2021-7 to XY) National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31672303 to CY and No. 31970427 to WL).

    Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avrs.2022.100024.

  • Agrostatistics, 2011. BANAEC: final results on the occupancy and land use for the territory of Bulgaria in 2011. Bull. Minist. Agr. Food 182, 1-20. (in Bulgarian).
    Arroyo, B., Garcia, J.T., Bretagnolle, V., 2002. Conservation of the Montagu's Harrier (Circus pygargus) in agricultural areas. Anim. Conserv. 5, 283-290.
    Balbontin, J., Penteriani, V., Ferrer, M., 2003. Variation in the age of mates as an early warning signal of changes in population trends? The case of Bonelli's Eagle in Andalusia. Biol. Conserv. 109, 417-423.
    Battin, J., 2004. When good animals love bad habitats: ecological traps and the conservation of animal populations. Conserv. Biol. 18, 1482-1491.
    Bender, D.J., Contreras, T.A., Fahrig, L., 1998. Habitat loss and population decline: a meta-analysis of the patch size effect. Ecology 79, 517-533.
    BirdLife International, 2020. Species factsheet: Aquila heliaca. . (Accessed 12 May 2020).
    Bondev, Z., 1991. Flora in Bulgaria. Publishing House "Kliment Ohridsky", Sofia. (in Bulgarian).
    Bragin, E., 2000. On the demography of the Imperial Eagle Aquila heliaca in Kazakhstan. In: Chancellor, R.D., Meyburg, B. -U. (Eds. ), Raptors at Risk. WWGBP/Hancock House, pp. 409-413.
    Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R., 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-theoretic Approach. second ed. Springer, New York.
    Cardador, L., Carrete, M., Manosa, S., 2011. Can intensive agricultural landscapes favour some raptor species? The Marsh Harrier in north-eastern Spain. Anim. Conserv. 14, 382-390.
    Coates, P.S., Howe, K.B., Casazza, M.L., Delehanty, D.J., 2014. Landscape alterations influence differential habitat use of nesting buteos and ravens within sagebrush ecosystem: implications for transmission line development. Condor 116, 341-356.
    del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., Sargatal, J., 1994. Handbook of the Birds of the World. Vol. 2: New World Vultures to Guineafowl. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.
    Demerdzhiev, D., Boev, Z., Dobrev, D., Terziev, N., Nedyalkov, N., Stoychev, S., et al., 2022. Diet of Eastern Imperial Eagle (Aquila heliaca) in Bulgaria: composition, distribution and variation. Biodivers. J. 10, e77746. .
    Demerdzhiev, D.A., 2011. Eastern Imperial Eagle (Aquila heliaca heliaca Savigny, 1809) (ACCIPITRIDAE-AVES) in Bulgaria - distribution, biology, ecology, numbers, and conservation measures. Ph. D. thesis. BAS-NMNH, Sofia. (in Bulgarian with English summary).
    Demerdzhiev, D.A., Dobrev, D.D., Stoychev, S.A., Levent, I.E., Petrov, Ts. H., Boev, Z.N., 2018. Long-term population survey of the Eastern Imperial Eagle in the Thracian Eco-region (Bulgaria and Turkey). Raptor. Conserv. Suppl. 1, 111-112.
    Demerdzhiev, D.A., Popgeorgiev, G.S., Dobrev, D.D., Arkumarev, V.S., Terziev, N.G., 2019. Habitat requirements of the Lesser Spotted Eagle Clanga pomarina Brehm, 1831 (Aves: Accipitridae) at the southern periphery of the distribution range (southeast Bulgaria). Acta Zool. Bulg. Suppl. 14, 35-65.
    Demerdzhiev, D.A., Horvath, M., Kovacs, A., Stoychev, S.A., Karyakin, I.V., 2011. Status and population trend of the Eastern Imperial Eagle (Aquila heliaca) in Europe in the period 2000-2010. Acta Zool. Bulg. Suppl. 3, 5-14.
    Demerdzhiev, D.A., Stoychev, S.A., Dobrev, D.D., Spasov, S.D., Terziev, N.G., 2014b. Conservation measures undertaken to improve the population status of Eastern Imperial Eagle (Aquila heliaca) in Bulgaria. Slovak Raptor J. 8, 27-39.
    Demerdzhiev, D.A., Stoychev, S.S., Dobrev, D.D., Spasov S.D., Oppel, S., 2015. Studying the demographic drivers of an increasing Imperial Eagle population to inform conservation management. Biod. Conserv. 24: 627-639.
    Demerdzhiev, D.A., Dobrev, V.D., Popgeorgiev, G.S., 2014a. Effects of habitat change on territory occupancy, breeding density and breeding success of Long-legged Buzzard (Buteo rufinus, Cretzschmar, 1927) in Besaparski Riodove Special Protection Area (Natura 2000), southern Bulgaria. Acta Zool. Bulg. Suppl. 5, 191-200.
    Dobrev, V.D., Popgeorgiev, G.S., Plachiyski, D.G., 2014. Effects of the Common Agricultural Policy on the coverage of grassland habitats in Besaparski Ridove Special Protection Area (Natura 2000), southern Bulgaria. Acta Zool. Bulg. Suppl. 5, 147-155.
    Donald, P.F., Collar, N.J., Marsden, S.J., Pain, D., 2013. Facing Extinction. The World's Rarest Birds and the Race to Save Them. Christopher Helm, London.
    ESRI, 2016. ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.4.1. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands.
    Ferguson-Lees, J., Christie, D.A., 2001. Raptors of the World. Christopher Helm, London.
    Fernandez, M., Oria, J., Sanchez, R., Gonzalez, L.M., Margalida, T. 2009. Space use of adult Spanish Imperial Eagles Aquila adalberti. Acta Ornithol. 44, 17-26.
    Ferrer, M., Donazar, J.A., 1996. Density-dependent fecundity by habitat heterogeneity in an increasing population of Spanish Imperial Eagles. Ecology 77, 69-74.
    Ferrer, M., Morandini, V., 2017. Better nutritional condition changes the distribution of juvenile dispersal distances: an experiment with Spanish Imperial Eagles. J. Avian Biol. 48, 1342-1347.
    Ferrer, M., Newton, I., Casado, E., 2006. How to test different density-dependent fecundity hypotheses in an increasing or stable population. J. Anim. Ecol. 75, 111-117.
    Foley, J.A., DeFries, R., Asner, G.P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S.R., et al., 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science 309, 570-574.
    Galabov, Z., 1982. Physiographic regions. In: Galabov, Z. (Ed. ), Geography of Bulgaria, 3. Physiography. BAS, Sofia, pp. 315. (in Bulgarian).
    Gill, F.B., Wolf, L.L., 1975. Economics of feeding territoriality in the Golden-winged Sunbird. Ecology 56, 333-345.
    Gonzalez, L.M., Bustamante, J., Hiraldo, F., 1990. Factors influencing the present distribution of the Spanish Imperial Eagle (Aquila adalberti). Biol. Conserv. 51, 311-319.
    Gonzalez, L.M., Bustamante, J., Hiraldo, F., 1992. Nesting habitat selection by the Spanish Imperial Eagle Aquila adalberti. Biol. Conserv. 59, 45-50.
    Green, R., 1979. Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental Biologists. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
    Hammer, S., Harper, D.A.T., Ryan, P.D., 2001. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 4, 9.
    Horvath, M., Szitta, T., Firmanszky, G., Solti, B., Kovacs, A., Moskat, C., 2010. Spatial variation in prey composition and its possible effect on reproductive success in an expanding Eastern Imperial Eagle (Aquila heliaca) population. Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. H. 56, 187-200.
    Horvath, M., Szitta, T., Bagyura, J., Fater, I., Firmanszky, G., Moskat, C., 2014. Simultaneous effect of habitat and age on reproductive success of Imperial Eagles (Aquila heliaca) in Hungary. Ornis Hung. 22, 57-68.
    Jaeger, J.A.G., Bertiller, R., Schwick, C., Muller, K., Steinmeier, C., Ewald, K.C., et al., 2008. Implementing landscape fragmentation as an indicator in the Swiss Monitoring System of Sustainable Development (Monet). J. Environ. Manage. 88, 737-751.
    Jongman, R.H.G., 2002. Homogenisation and fragmentation of the European landscape: ecological consequences and solutions. Landscape Urban Plan. 58, 211-221.
    Karyakin, I.V., 2018. Distribution, population number and status of the Eastern Imperial Eagle in Russia and Kazakhstan. Raptor. Conserv. Suppl. 1, 115-117.
    Katzner, T., Bragin, E., Knick, S., Smith, A., 2005. Relationship between demographics and diet specificity of Imperial Eagles Aquila heliaca in Kazakhstan. Ibis 147, 576-586.
    Krebs, J.R., 1971. Territory and breeding density in the Great Tit, Parus major L. Ecology 52, 2-22.
    Liberatori, F., Penteriani, V., 2001. A long term analysis of the declining population of the Egyptian Vulture in the Italian peninsula: distribution, habitat preference, productivity and conservation implications. Biol. Conserv. 101, 381-389.
    Margalida, A., Manosa, S., Gonzalez, L.M., Ortega, E., Sanchez, R., Oria, J., 2008. Breeding of non-adults and effect of age on productivity in the Spanish Imperial Eagle Aquila adalberti. Ardea 96, 173-180.
    McClure, C.J.W., Westrip, J.R.S., Johnson, J.A., Schulwitz, S.E., Virani, M.Z., Davies, R., et al., 2018. State of the world's raptors: distributions, threats, and conservation recommendations. Biol. Conserv. 227, 390-402.
    Meshinev, T., Apostolova, I., Georgiev, G., Dimitrov, V., Petrova, A., Veen, P., 2005. Grasslands of Bulgaria. Final report on the National Grasslands Inventory Project, Bulgaria, 2001-2004. (PINMATRA/2001/020). Dragon 2003 Publishers, Sofia.
    Murgatroyd, M., Underhill, G.L., Rodrigues, L., Amar, A., 2016. The influence of agricultural transformation on the breeding performance of a top predator: Verreaux's Eagles in contrasting land use areas. Condor 118, 238-252.
    Newbold, T., Hudson, L.N., Hill, S.L.L., Contu, S., Lysenko I., Senior, R.A., et al., 2015. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520, 45-50.
    Newton, I., 1979. Population Ecology of Raptors. T. and A.D. Poyser, Berkhamsted.
    Newton, I., 1991. Habitat variation and population regulation in sparrowhawks. Ibis 133, 76-88.
    Patterson, I.J., 1980. Territorial behaviour and the limitation of population density. Ardea 68, 53-62.
    Pedrini, P., Sergio, F., 2001. Density, productivity, diet and human persecution of Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) in the central-eastern Italian Alps. J. Raptor Res. 35, 40-48.
    Penteriani, V., Balbontin, J., Ferrer, M., 2003. Simultaneous effects of age and territory quality on fecundity in Bonelli's Eagle (Hieraaetus fasciatus). Ibis 145, 77-82.
    Penteriani, V., Gallardo, M., Roche, P., Cazassus, H., 2001. Effects of landscape spatial structure and composition on the settlement of the Eagle Owl Bubo bubo in a Mediterranean habitat. Ardea 89, 331-340.
    Pongracz, A., Szitta, T., 2015. Current situation and population trend of the lesser spotted eagle (Aquila pomarina) in Hungary. Raptor J. 9, 65-69.
    Pulliam, H.R., 1988. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am. Nat. 132, 652-661.
    R Core Team, 2012. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
    Real, J., Manosa, S., 1997. Demography and conservation of western European Bonelli's eagle Hieraaetus fasciatus populations. Biol. Conserv. 79, 59-66.
    Reynolds, R.T., Lambert, J. S, Kay, S.L., Sanderlin, J.S., Bird, B.J., 2019. Factors affecting lifetime reproduction, long-term territory-specific reproduction, and estimation of habitat quality in northern goshawks. PLoS ONE 14, e0215841.
    Rudnick, J.A., Katzner, T.E., Bragin, E.A., Rhodes, O.E., Dewoody, J.A., 2005. Using naturally shed feathers for individual identification, genetic parentage analyses, and population monitoring in an endangered Eastern Imperial Eagle Aquila heliaca population from Kazakhstan. Mol. Ecol. 14, 2959-2967.
    Sara, M., Di Vittorio, M., 2003. Factors influencing the distribution, abundance and nest-site selection of an endangered Egyptian vulture (Neophron percnopterus) population in Sicily. Anim. Conserv. 6, 317-328.
    Schlaepfer, M.A., Runge, M.C., Sherman, P.W., 2002. Ecological and evolutionary traps. Trend. Ecol. Evol. 17, 474-480.
    Sergio, F., Newton, I., 2003. Occupancy as a measure of territory quality. J. Anim. Ecol. 72, 857-865.
    Sergio, F., Blas, J., Baos, R., Forero, M.G., Donazar, J.A., Hiraldo, F., 2009. Short- and long-term consequences of individual and territory quality in a long-lived bird. Oecologia 160, 507-514.
    Shannon, C.E., Weaver, W., 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
    StatSoft Inc., 2011. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 10. .
    Steenhof, K., Kochert, M.N., Doremus, J.H., 1983. Nesting of subadult golden eagles in Southwestern Idaho. Auk 100, 743-747.
    Sternalski, A., Mougeot, F., Bretagnolle, V., 2012a. Carotenoid limitation and allocation priorities in asynchronous raptor nestlings. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 105, 13-24.
    Sternalski, A., Mougeot, F., Eraud, C., Gangloff, B., Villers, A., Bretagnolle, V., 2010. Carotenoids in nestling Montagu's Harriers: variations according to age, sex, body condition and evidence for diet-related limitations. J. Comp. Physiol. 180, 33-43.
    Sternalski, A., Mougeot, F., Perez-Rodriguez, L., Bretagnolle, V., 2012b. Carotenoid-based coloration, condition, and immune responsiveness in the nestlings of a sexually dimorphic bird of prey. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 85, 364-375.
    Sternalski, A., Blanc, J.F., Augiron, S., Rocheteau, V., Bretagnolle, V., 2013. Comparative breeding performance of Marsh Harriers Circus aeruginosus along a gradient of land use intensification and implications for population management. Ibis 155, 55-67.
    Tittler, R., Fahrig, L., Villard, M.A., 2006. Evidence of large-scale source-sink dynamics and long-distance dispersal among wood thrush populations. Ecology 87, 3029-3036.
    Vali, U., Tuvi, J., Sein, G., 2017. Agricultural land use shapes habitat selection, foraging and reproductive success of the Lesser Spotted Eagle Clanga pomarina. J. Ornithol. 158, 841-850.
    Vili, N., Szabo, K., Kovacs, S., Kabai, P., Kalmar, L., Horvath, M., 2013. High turnover rate revealed by noninvasive genetic analyses in an expanding Eastern Imperial Eagle population. Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. H. 59, 279-295.
    Whitfield, D.P., Fielding, A.H., Gregory, M.J.P., Gordon, A.G., McLeod, D.R.A., Haworth, P.F., 2007. Complex effects of habitat loss on Golden Eagles Aquila chrysaetos. Ibis 149, 26-3.
  • Related Articles

Catalog

    Figures(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (179) PDF downloads (5) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return