
Citation: | Tong ZHANG, Ming MA, Peng DING, Feng XU, Paul J. BUZZARD. 2012: Status and behavior of the Black-necked Crane (Grus nigricollis) in the Altun Mountain Reserve, Xinjiang. Avian Research, 3(3): 199-205. DOI: 10.5122/cbirds.2012.0021 |
The Black-necked Crane (Grus nigricollis) is an endemic species of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, with its population in Xinjiang largely found in the Kunlun and Altun mountain regions. A survey of the distribution, population dynamics, flock size and behavior was conducted in Altun Mountain National Natural Reserve from September to November 2011. We investigated the size and distribution of its population in this area with a sample spot survey and by direct counting. We found Black-necked Cranes on the wetlands of Wuzunxiaoer, Yusup Aleksei, Yaziquan, Qimantag, Tula Ranch and elsewhere, where we recorded 126 individual birds of the species in Yixiekepati (37° 15'-37°23'N, 90°11'-90°20'E, elevation 3903 m), the largest population we have observed in this area. In the reserve, the population consists of about 180-200 birds. Combined with previous records, we conclude that more than 260 Black-necked Cranes live in Xinjiang. Cranes gathered conspicuously in the middle of October where the highest number of birds appeared on 29 October. All of the cranes had migrated out of this area by 6 November. Time budgets and diurnal behavior rhythms of Blacknecked Cranes were observed in the Yixiekepati wetland at daylight (from 06:00 to 18:00). Foraging was the most prevalent type of behavior during the autumn period, accounting for 58.9% of the diurnal time budget, followed by preening (13.2%), vigilance (9.5%), walking (8.2%), flying (3.5%), resting (3.4%), chirping (2.7%) and other types of behavior (0.6%).
Hainan Peacock Pheasant (Polyplectron katsumatae) is a rare tropical forest bird endemic to the island of Hainan, China (Cheng et al., 1978; Cheng, 1987; Zheng, 2005), and distributed only in the mountainous region of central and southwestern Hainan with evergreen broadleaf-dominated forests. Generally considered as a subspecies of the Grey Peacock Pheasant (P. bicalcaratum) which is distributed in a relatively larger range, the Hainan Peacock Pheasant has been recognized as non-threatened by the IUCN Red List for a long time (IUCN, 2006), and it has just been listed as "Endangered (EN)" species by the IUCN Red List since 2010 (IUCN, 2011). In China, it was listed as an endangered bird with Category I of nationally protected animals (Zheng and Wang, 1998).
So far, little has been known about the natural history, ecology and spatial requirements of the Hainan Peacock Pheasant (Gao and Yu, 1990; Gao and Yang, 1991; Gao, 1998; Gao and Yu, 2000). The knowledge of the natural history and spatial requirements of threatened species is crucial for promising conservation strategies and the maintenance of viable populations (Crandall et al., 2000). In the light of this, here we provided updated information on the ecology and conservation status of the Hainan Peacock Pheasant, by integrating published data and our field surveys, including the radio-telemetry work in the Bawangling National Nature Reserve (18°57′–19°11′N, 109°3′–109°17′E) in 2000 and 2004 (Li, 2005).
The peacock pheasants (Polyplectron spp.), comprising of six or seven species, is a group of small, relatively somber forest pheasants in tropical Asia (Madge et al., 2002). Only two taxa of peacock pheasants are distributed in China, the Grey Peacock Pheasant (P. bicalcaratum) in the west and southwest of Yunnan (Delacour, 1977; Cheng et al., 1978; Cheng, 1987; Johnsgard, 1999; Madge et al., 2002; Zheng, 2005) and the Hainan Peacock Pheasant (P. katsumatae) that is endemic to Hainan Island (Cheng, 1987; Zheng, 2005).
The Hainan Peacock Pheasant was first described in 1906 and was treated as a full species, Polyplectron katsumatae Rothschild. Delacour (1977) lumped it with the Grey Peacock Pheasant and this taxonomic treatment became widely accepted (Johnsgard, 1986, 1999; Cheng, 1987, 1994; Gao and Yang, 1991; del Hoyo et al., 1994; Clements, 2000; Dickinson, 2003); however, some ornithologists still considered the Hainan Peacock Pheasant as a full species (Sibley and Monroe, 1990; Monroe and Sibley 1993; Mackinnon and Phillipps, 1999; Madge et al., 2002; Zheng, 2002, 2005), since taxonomy plays a key role in species conservation (Mace, 2004).
More recently, molecular markers, including the complete mitochondrial cytochrome b gene and intron G of the nuclear ovomucoid gene, were used to re-evaluate the taxonomy of the Hainan Peacock Pheasant. The results showed phylogeographic monophyly and large genetic distance between the Hainan Peacock Pheasant and the Grey Peacock Pheasant, with sequence differences corroborating the species-level distinction between the two peacock pheasants, which were inferred to have diverged about 1.4 ± 0.3 million years ago, and thus suggested the Hainan Peacock Pheasant should be considered as a full species (Chang et al., 2008).
The morphological data also indicate that the Hainan Peacock Pheasant (male: 511.7 ± 24.7 mm in body length, n = 5; female: 376.3 ± 45.2 mm in body length, n = 3) is distinct from the Grey Peacock Pheasant (male: 665.5 ± 3.5 mm in body length, n = 2; female: 515.7 ± 51.0 mm in body length, n = 3) (Delacour, 1977; Yang et al., 1995; Madge et al., 2002; see also Chang et al., 2008). In addition, the crest of the Hainan Peacock Pheasant is obviously shorter than that of the Grey Peacock Pheasant. Differences also exist in the color of ocelli, with those of the mantle and wings blue and green, and the tail ocelli have a complete grayish-buff border and a diameter of no more than 15 mm (Cheng, 2002) (Fig. 1, also see www.cnbird.org.cn with the Grey Peacock Pheasant for comparison).
The taxonomic uncertainty of the Hainan Peacock Pheasant is highly relevant to its conservation status. Among the taxa of Polyplectron spp., Hainan Peacock Pheasant is the smallest among allied species of somber forest peacock pheasants. Considering its limited distribution and small population size, as a full species, it has now been recognized as "Endangered" by the IUCN Red List (IUCN, 2011) to prevent loss of this island endemic.
The Hainan Peacock Pheasant was once widely distributed in tropical rainforest over most of Hainan Island, especially the central and southwestern mountains (Guangdong Institute of Entomology et al., 1983; Gao, 1998). As a result of habitat loss (Lin and Zhang, 2001) and illegal hunting, both the range and population have decreased drastically since the 1950s (Zheng and Wang, 1998), and the extant population of the Hainan Peacock Pheasant has become fragmented into small, partially isolated populations (Table 1 and Fig. 2).
Number in Fig. 2 | Site | Protected status a | Reference b |
1 | Jianfengling | NNR | 2, 3 |
2 | Houmiling | PNR | 1, 2, 3 |
3 | Jiaxi | PNR | 3 |
4 | Bawangling | NNR | 1, 2, 3 |
5 | Yinggeling | PNR | 3 |
6 | Limushan | PNR | 2, 3 |
7 | Panjia | PNR | 3 |
8 | Nanweiling | 1, 2, 3 | |
9 | Huishan | PNR | 3 |
10 | Baimaling | 3 | |
11 | Diaoluoshan | NNR | 1, 2, 3 |
12 | Wuzhishan | NNR | 2, 3 |
13 | Kafaling | 3 | |
14 | Maorui | 3 | |
15 | Baolong | 3 | |
16 | Ganshiling | PNR | 3 |
17 | Baomei | PNR | 3 |
18 c | Xinglong | 1 | |
a NNR, national nature reserve; PNR, provincial nature reserve. b 1, Guangdong Institute of Entomology et al. (1983); 2, Gao (1998); 3, field surveys confirmed by the present study. c Historical distribution site recorded by Guangdong Institute of Entomology et al. (1983). |
The population density of the Hainan Peacock Pheasant in Bawangling National Nature Reserve (NNR) was provisionally estimated at 3.75 birds per km2 in 1992 and 3.74 birds per km2 in 1993 (Gao, 1998). Based on an estimated population of 2700 individuals in 1990s (Gao and Yu, 1990), and assuming the population has declined at 50–79% over the past 15 years (three generations), the population is best placed in the band 250–999 individuals (Chang et al. 2008). However, further surveys are urgently required to assess the population size throughout the entire island.
The Hainan Peacock Pheasant inhabits only natural tropical forests, e.g. primary and secondary forests in the mountainous regions with 200–1300 m in elevation, and within its habitat, dominant trees include Homalium hainanense, Podocarpus imbricatus, Vatica mangachapoi, Dacry diumpier and Syzygium araiocladum. No peacock pheasants were found in plantations, including rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis), eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) and areca (Areca catechu), though these plantations seemed to be in "good" condition with dense forest cover. In Bawangling NNR, habitat features, such as density and coverage of shrub, distance to water, grass abundance and human disturbance, were among main factors influencing habitat use of the Hainan Peacock Pheasant (Li, 2005).
Radio-tracking data showed that the home range of the Hainan Peacock Pheasant was much small and relatively fixed (male: 2.95 ha, with a range of 2.32–8.59 ha, n = 3; female: 2.54 ha, with a range of 1.48–3.4 ha, n = 1). Several local hunters also reported that the Hainan Peacock Pheasant was much easy to capture within its fixed foraging sites, and it turned out to be the case further confirmed by us using walk-in traps.
The Hainan Peacock Pheasant usually lives solitarily, or in pairs during the breeding season, rather than in groups (more than two birds), and monogamy is suggested as its mating system (Gao and Yang, 1991) but this needs further investigation. The breeding season is from February to June and lasts long enough up to five months, while males mark their territories by loudly crowing with "guo-guo-guo…", much different from its alarming call "ga-ga". All nests found were on the ground in the forest near the ridge, either at the base of trees, or under the rocks, with a small clutch size of only 1 egg or 2 eggs (n = 5) (Table 2). The egg size and mass, incubation periods and reproductive success remain unknown, but low fecundity together with high predation is suggested in this rare tropical pheasant.
Nest No. | ||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
Date | June 11, 1988 | Feb 23, 2001 | Feb 27, 2001 | April 2003 | April 26, 2000 | |
Location | Xinglong | Bawangling | Bawangling | Bawangling | Bawangling | Bawangling |
Nest site | Forest, ground | Forest, ground | Forest, ground | Forest, ground | Forest, ground | Forest, ground |
Elevation (m) | 200 | 950 | 1025 | 1025 | 1030 | |
Nest material | Dead leaves and grass | Dead leaves | Dead leaves | Dead leaves | Dead leaves | Dead leaves |
Nest size (cm) | 15 × 15 × 3 | 23 × 20 × 3 | 19 × 18 × 7 | |||
Clutch size | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |
Egg color | Pure white | Pure white | Pure white | Pure white | ||
Nest fate | Collected | Collected | 2 nestlings | Predated | 1 nestling | |
Reference | Guangdong Institute of Entomology et al. (1983) | Gao and Yang (1991) | This study | This study | This study | This study |
Deforestation and replacement with exotic tree species such as Acacia mangium, and Eucalyptus spp. occurred in some forest areas (Fig. 3) and these are important threats to the Hainan Peacock Pheasant and other forest birds, e.g., Hainan Partridge (Arborophila ardens), even though few local people could benefit from these activities (Liang et al., 2005).
Illegal hunting of birds is found in most surveyed areas, and is carried out mainly for sale in markets, rather than by local people for their own consumption (Liang et al., 2005). From December 1987 to August 1988, more than 30 hunted peacock pheasants were found in Bawangling, Nanweiling, Limushan and Diaoluoshan areas (Gao and Yang, 1991). Among 17 current distribution sites of the Hainan Peacock Pheasant (Table 1), and during a survey period of 2002–2006, at least one hunted peacock pheasant was found at 10 sites (58.8%), including three national nature reserves and five provincial nature reserves, suggesting that almost none of these reserves was secure from illegal hunting or trapping. However, illegal hunting was much more common in forest areas outside the nature reserves, e.g. Nanweiling (Liang, unpublished data) and Baimaling (Nanmao) (Gong et al., 2006; Liang, Cai and Yang, unpublished data), whilst egrets and swallows were well protected in most areas of Hainan (Liang et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2010). This suggest that local traditional culture should play a key role in conservation (Liang et al., 2010), and should be taken into account for any promising conservation strategies for this threatened species.
The findings that the Hainan Peacock Pheasant was not found in any of the forest plantations, let alone any other man-made habitat, and that hunting for this peacock pheasant was common, indicate indirectly that loss of habitat and hunting must have greatly reduced its numbers, and the population is likely to have declined rapidly. Apparently, conservation status of the Hainan Peacock Pheasant is not so satisfactory, and further surveys are urgently required to assess the population size and habitat requirements of this endangered and rare tropical pheasant throughout the entire island. Also, future investigation should focus on life history traits in relation to its vulnerability.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 30860044, 30360015 and 39830030) and by Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-10-0111). We thank the Forestry Department of Hainan Province for support and permission to carry out the study. Qing CHEN and Wenba SU provided the photo of the Hainan Peacock Pheasant. Jiankang SHI kindly helped with distribution figure. We also thank Jichao WANG, Jingrui LI, Canchao YANG, Yan CAI for their help in the field survey.
Achuff P, Petocz R. 1988. Preliminary Resource Inventory of the Arjin Mountains Nature Reserve, Xinjiang, People's Republic of China. World Wide Fund for Nature, Gland, Switzerland.
|
Bishop MA. 1996. Black-necked Crane (Grus nigricollis). In: Meine C, Archibald G (eds) The Cranes: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, pp 184-193.
|
Cang QZM, Gu BY, Bishop MA. 1994. The number of wintering Black-necked Crane in Tibet. Tibet Sci Technol, 3: 12-13. (in Chinese)
|
Cuthill IC, Houston AI, 1997. Managing time and energy. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach (4th edn). Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 97-120.
|
Gao LB, Qian FW, Yang XJ, Wu HQ, Li FS. 2007. Satellite tracking on the migratory routes of wintering Black-necked Cranes at Dashanbao in Yunnan. Zool Res, 28(4): 353-361. (in Chinese)
|
Gao XY. 1987. The birds in East Kunlun-Altun mountains regions. Arid Zone Res, 4: 1-10. (in Chinese)
|
Kong DJ, Yang XJ, Zhong XY, Dao MB, Zhu Y. 2008. Diurnal time budget and behavior rhythm of wintering Black-necked Crane (Grus nigricollis) at Dashanbao in Yunnan. Zool Res, 2: 195-202. (in Chinese)
|
Li F S, Bishop M A. 1999. Ecology and conservation of Black-necked cranes Grus nigricollis. In: Adams NJ, Slotow RH (eds) Proc 22 Int Ornithol Congr, Durban. BirdLife South Africa, Johannesburg, pp 2533-2543.
|
Li FS, Yang F. 2003. Population numbers and distribution of Black-necked Cranes (Grus nigricollis) in the Yungui Gaoyuan Plateau. Chin J Zool, 3: 43-46. (in Chinese)
|
Li FS, Yang XJ, Yang F. 2005. Status and Conservation of Black-necked Cranes on the Yunnan and Guizhou Plateau, People's Republic of China. Yunnan National Publishing House, Kunming, pp 44-56. (in Chinese)
|
Li LX. 1997. Population ecology and endangered categories evaluation of the Black-necked crane (Grus nigricollus). Chin Biodivers, 2: 84-89. (in Chinese)
|
Li ZM, Li FS. 2005. Black-necked Crane Study. Shanghai Technological and Educational Press, Shanghai. (in Chinese)
|
Lu X, Zheng GM. 2009. Time budgets of Tibetan eared pheasants during the non-breeding season in an alpine scrub habitat. Curr Zool, 3: 193-199.
|
Ma M. 2011. A checklist on the Distribution of the Birds in Xinjiang. Science Press, Beijing, pp 39-40. (in Chinese)
|
Ma M, Li WD, Zhang HB, Zhang X, Yuan GY, Chen Y, Yuan L, Ding P, Zhang Y, Cheng Y, Sagen GL. 2011. Distribution and population state of Black-necked crane Grus nigricollus in Lop Nur and Kunlun Mts., Southern Xinjiang. Chin J Zool, 3: 64-68. (in Chinese)
|
Ma ZJ, Zhang ZW, Chen JK. 2000. Effects of climate change on the distribution of cranes in China. Glob Environ Res, 4: 231-237. (in Chinese)
|
National Forestry Bureau. 2009. Resource Survey on the Key Animals in China. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing, pp197-206.
|
Ran JH, Liu SY, Zeng ZY, Shao KQ, Lin Q, Zhang M. 1999. The population and distribution of Black-necked Cranes (Grus nigricollis) in Xiaman Nature Reserve in Sichuan. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 1: 40-44. (in Chinese)
|
Ricklefs RE. 1996. Avian energetics, ecology, and evolution. In: Carey C (ed) Avian Energetics. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 1-30.
|
Tian FL. 1999. Plateau bird-black-necked crane. Environ Protect Xinjiang, 4: 63. (in Chinese)
|
Tsamchue D, Yang L, Li JC, Yangjaen D. 2008. Current status of conservation and research on Black-necked Cranes. Sichuan J Zool, 3: 449-453.
|
Wang QS, Ma M, Gao YR. 2006. Fauna Sinica Aves. Vol. 5. Gruiformes, Charadriiformes and Lariformes. Science Press, Beijing, pp 48-52. (in Chinese)
|
Weathers WW, Buttemer AM, Hayworth AM, Nagy K. 1984. An evaluation of time budget estimates of daily energy expenditure in birds. Auk, 101: 459-472.
|
Wu ZK, Li ZM, Wang YH, Jiang YM, Li RX, Li DH, Zhou ZJ, Li LX. 1993. Migration of Black-necked Crane in China. Acta Zool Sin, 1: 105-106. (in Chinese)
|
Yan S. 2006. Migration of Black-necked Crane. Forest Humankind, 11: 56-59. (in Chinese)
|
Zhang F, Zhang HB. 1991. Preliminary report of Black-necked Crane in Yixiekepati lakeside, Altun Mountains. Yunnan Geogr Environ Res, 2: 92-93. (in Chinese)
|
Number in Fig. 2 | Site | Protected status a | Reference b |
1 | Jianfengling | NNR | 2, 3 |
2 | Houmiling | PNR | 1, 2, 3 |
3 | Jiaxi | PNR | 3 |
4 | Bawangling | NNR | 1, 2, 3 |
5 | Yinggeling | PNR | 3 |
6 | Limushan | PNR | 2, 3 |
7 | Panjia | PNR | 3 |
8 | Nanweiling | 1, 2, 3 | |
9 | Huishan | PNR | 3 |
10 | Baimaling | 3 | |
11 | Diaoluoshan | NNR | 1, 2, 3 |
12 | Wuzhishan | NNR | 2, 3 |
13 | Kafaling | 3 | |
14 | Maorui | 3 | |
15 | Baolong | 3 | |
16 | Ganshiling | PNR | 3 |
17 | Baomei | PNR | 3 |
18 c | Xinglong | 1 | |
a NNR, national nature reserve; PNR, provincial nature reserve. b 1, Guangdong Institute of Entomology et al. (1983); 2, Gao (1998); 3, field surveys confirmed by the present study. c Historical distribution site recorded by Guangdong Institute of Entomology et al. (1983). |
Nest No. | ||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
Date | June 11, 1988 | Feb 23, 2001 | Feb 27, 2001 | April 2003 | April 26, 2000 | |
Location | Xinglong | Bawangling | Bawangling | Bawangling | Bawangling | Bawangling |
Nest site | Forest, ground | Forest, ground | Forest, ground | Forest, ground | Forest, ground | Forest, ground |
Elevation (m) | 200 | 950 | 1025 | 1025 | 1030 | |
Nest material | Dead leaves and grass | Dead leaves | Dead leaves | Dead leaves | Dead leaves | Dead leaves |
Nest size (cm) | 15 × 15 × 3 | 23 × 20 × 3 | 19 × 18 × 7 | |||
Clutch size | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |
Egg color | Pure white | Pure white | Pure white | Pure white | ||
Nest fate | Collected | Collected | 2 nestlings | Predated | 1 nestling | |
Reference | Guangdong Institute of Entomology et al. (1983) | Gao and Yang (1991) | This study | This study | This study | This study |