The first published assessments of the Great Bustard (Otis tarda) status estimated the world population to be around 20000–30000 birds during the final decades of the 20th century (Table 1). Most of them were based on numbers guessed or extrapolated from local counts, and thus the reliability of the total obtained strongly depended on the quality of the estimates made for the countries hosting the largest populations, particularly Spain, Russia and China. For example, the first detailed account of the Great Bustard numbers and distribution in Spain gave a total of about 17000–19000 birds in the 1990s (Alonso and Alonso, 1996), and suggested that all figures published before had underestimated the size of the Spanish population. Based on that study, the world estimates were increased by 6500 birds in only a couple of years (from 25640–30480, SEO/BirdLife, 1997, to 31000–37000 birds, del Hoyo et al., 1996; BirdLife International, 2000a). A review of the species status in Spain made a few years later established a new total of about 23000 (Alonso et al., 2003), and a re-assessment of recent counts increased again the Spanish total to 27500–30000, and the world total to 43500–51200 birds (Palacín and Alonso, 2008). Since the progressive increase in Great Bustard numbers shown by these estimates is mostly due to a better knowledge of the species and the areas surveyed, any conclusions about population trends should be taken with care, and confirmed with more counts in the future.
Table
1.
Published estimates of the world population of Great Bustards
Here we present an updated review of the Great Bustard status worldwide, based on the most recent counts available. We also discuss possible recent demographic trends in countries with adequate survey quality, and identify regions where more precise census work is urgently needed. Other details were given in our last population assessment (Palacín and Alonso, 2008), where we made a thorough review of the status and trends in each country of the species distribution range.
Methods
We revised all Great Bustard census results throughout the whole distribution range of the species, including papers published in scientific journals or presented at international meetings, as well as surveys accepted by national conservation authorities as reflecting the status of the species in their respective countries. The details of the census methodologies employed in each case may be found in the cited references. Besides, we also contacted most researchers working with Great Bustards to know their latest unpublished counts. To calculate the ponderated average year of estimate we used the last year of the time interval indicated under 'year of estimate' in Table 2, except for Spain, where we computed a ponderated average census year using the years of census for each region (the ponderated average for Spain was year 2007).
Table
2.
Current estimate of breeding populations of the great bustard, ordered by numbers of birds. See Methods for criteria used to evaluate the quality of estimate.
a Includes references cited in Palacín and Alonso (2008), plus own surveys for several regions in 2009–2010, and pers. com. from Delegaciones Provinciales de Medio Ambiente of Toledo and Cuenca, Departamentos de Medio Ambiente of Aragón and Navarra. b Subspecies Otis tarda dybowskii. c Communicated during the Second Meeting of the Great Bustard MoU held in Feodosia, Ukraine, in November 2008. d Ponderated average census year, see Methods.
The following criteria were established to evaluate the quality of the population counts or estimates for each country: (a) high, when (a1) the estimate was based on counts at all or most Great Bustard areas within the country, carried out by observers with previous experience counting Great Bustards, and applying a systematic and standardized methodology (for more details see Alonso et al, 2003; Alonso et al, 2005a), including long series of yearly counts of well monitored populations (e.g., Germany, Hungary), and (a2) the interval between minimum and maximum estimates did not exceed 15% of the maximum estimate, with the exception of very small populations (< 20 individuals), in which case we qualified estimates as high quality even if they not fulfilled a1, and (a3) the counts are from recent years (usually within the last five years); (b) medium, when (b1) the estimate was based on surveys with incomplete coverage of the habitat potentially suitable, and (b2) the interval between minimum and maximum estimates was between 15% and 30% of the maximum estimate; and (c) low, when (c1) the estimate was based on extrapolations of census results at smaller areas, or series of records from several years, rather than on systematic, simultaneous counts, and (c2) the interval between minimum and maximum estimates was > 30% of the maximum estimate, and/or (c3) the estimates are not from very recent years.
Results
The world population of Great Bustards is currently estimated to be between 44054 and 57005 individuals (Table 2), of which the largest part (57–70%) occurs in Spain. European Russia holds 15–25% of the world total, north-western China (Xinjiang) 1–5%, Mongolia, south-eastern Russia and north-eastern China 3–5% (subspecies O. t. dybowskii), Portugal 3–4%, Hungary 3%, Turkey 1–2%, and Ukraine 1–2%. Other countries hold less than 1% of the world total.
The reliability of current censuses and estimates may be described as high for the largest fraction of the world population (67–75%, including the Iberian Peninsula, Hungary, Austria, Germany, and several central European countries with very small numbers), medium for Morocco, and low for a 25–33% (including Russia, Mongolia, China, Turkey, Ukraine, Iran and Kazakhstan) (Table 2). The ponderated average year of estimate was 2005 (Table 2).
Discussion
The world estimate of 44054–57005 Great Bustards presented here is a 1–11% higher than our previous estimate (43500–51200, Palacín and Alonso, 2008). However, the major part of this difference is most likely due to a better precision in population assessments for various European countries, and only a minor fraction may be attributable to a real increase in bird numbers. The accuracy of estimates for Russia, Turkey and some Asian countries is still low, and determine the large difference between minimum and maximum estimate intervals.
Spain and Portugal were the countries with highest recent increases in population estimates (respectively, 7–14% in the last two years, and 35% in the last four years). Specifically for Spain, the main increases have been recorded in two provinces of region Castilla-La Mancha (290% increase in 12 years in Cuenca, and 44–100% increase in 5 years in Toledo). According to our own unpublished data, such increases are not possible with the low reproductive rates typical of this species, and the best explanation is therefore a higher accuracy in the most recent censuses. Nevertheless, we know that some Spanish and Portuguese populations have indeed increased slightly during the last 2–3 decades, particularly in Spain since a hunting ban was established in 1980, which stopped the steep decrease due to intensive hunting (up to 2000 birds/year, Trigo de Yarto, 1971) in previous decades. But many of these populations have now reached stability, and others have decreased or remained stable during the same period. Thus, the overall trend in Spain and Portugal might be best qualified as generally stable, with a slight tendency to increase at some high quality areas, and to decrease in marginal or worse conserved sites (Alonso et al., 2003, 2004; Pinto et al., 2005; Pinto and Rocha, 2006; Palacín and Alonso, 2008). Longer and more precise series of censuses are still necessary in both countries in order to determine whether there is still an intrinsic demographic increase, or the species is mostly stable.
A remarkable increase has also been recently observed in Austria (18–19% in just three years, between 2006 and 2009), which might perhaps be explained by a combination of high breeding success of the Austrian bustards, and some dispersal from nearby Hungarian populations. More reasonable increases have been recorded in Hungary (4–17% between 2006 and 2009) and Germany (4–5% between 2007 and 2009). The recent increases in these three countries, where Great Bustards had declined during many decades through the 20th century, may be attributed to the habitat protection and other conservation measures (Raab, 2004, 2006; Bankovics et al., 2005; Langgemach and Bellenbaum, 2005; Langgemach and Liztbarski, 2005; Bankovics, 2006; Túzokvédelmi Program, 2006).
In other countries, surveys are incomplete and most of them already somewhat old. The current estimates for these countries are usually based on extrapolations of numbers counted in smaller regions to the whole areas guessed to include habitat suitable for the species. Because such estimates are subject to high potential errors, they are here considered of lower quality. Moreover, these estimates do not enable establishing reliable demographic trends, when compared to figures published in the past. Examples are Russia, Mongolia, China, Iran, Turkey, Ukraine, and Kazakhstan. Precise and extensive census work is still necessary in these countries, in order to ascertain numbers and demographic trends. Specifically for the subspecies O. tarda tarda in China, a recent revision suggested that Gao et al's (2008) estimate for Xinjiang region was based on relatively old observations made in 1992–1993, and should be considered an overestimation of current numbers (Ying et al., 2010). These authors propose that numbers have probably decreased during the last two decades in Xinjiang, to some 300–400 birds (Ying et al., 2010). Given the huge size of this region, and in spite of the argued recent decrease, it could also be that detailed surveys conducted in the future result in higher numbers than these minimum estimates. Finally, numbers are relatively well known in Morocco and very accurate in several central European countries, where the species has recently gone extinct or is on the brink of extinction (Table 2).
In spite of the confounding effect of an increasing census accuracy through the last years, the comparison of the present review (Table 2) with previous world population estimates (see Table 1) strongly support our assertion that Great Bustard total numbers have not decreased worldwide, at least during the last two decades (Palacín and Alonso, 2008). This contradicts the global declining trend assumed until recent years (BirdLife International, 2004a, 2004b, 2007). The lack of a better knowledge of numbers and trends in several countries with important Great Bustard populations (e.g., Russia, Mongolia, China, Turkey, Ukraine) prevent us from drawing more precise conclusions about a worldwide demographic trend. In some of these countries the species is believed to be declining (e.g., China, see details for other countries in Palacín and Alonso, 2008), but the larger size of the Iberian population and its positive trend during the last years suggests that the world total might have remained more or less stable, or even slightly increased. These worldwide trends will only be completely confirmed when appropriate series of reliable counts become available in those countries where current estimates are still of low quality.
Acknowledgements
We thank A. Antonchikov, A. Bankovics, A. Barati, O. Goroshko, J. Hellmich, T. Langgemach, I. Leszai, B. Litzsbarski, R. Karakas, A. Kessler, A. V. Khrustov, L. Milós, M. Ming, M.L. Oparin, O.S. Oparina, M. Pinto, R. Raab, P. Rocha, and X.H. Tian for the information on great bustards in their countries, and A. Wang for his help and Chinese translations during the International Symposium on Great Bustards in Beijing. We are also grateful to all people in Spain who provided us with valuable information on local populations, or worked with us during the surveys. Special thanks are given to M. Alcántara, J.A. Arranz, A. Balmori, M. Elósegui, J. Ezquerra, M. Guerrero, J. Larumbe, for survey data in several Spanish regions, and to C. Bravo, M. Magaña, C. Ponce, and A. Torres for collaborating in recent censuses. Funds to complete this study were provided by project CGL2008-02567 of the Dirección General de Investigación.
Table
2.
Current estimate of breeding populations of the great bustard, ordered by numbers of birds. See Methods for criteria used to evaluate the quality of estimate.
a Includes references cited in Palacín and Alonso (2008), plus own surveys for several regions in 2009–2010, and pers. com. from Delegaciones Provinciales de Medio Ambiente of Toledo and Cuenca, Departamentos de Medio Ambiente of Aragón and Navarra. b Subspecies Otis tarda dybowskii. c Communicated during the Second Meeting of the Great Bustard MoU held in Feodosia, Ukraine, in November 2008. d Ponderated average census year, see Methods.
DownLoad:
Email Alerts
RSS Feeds