| Citation: |
Jonas Rafael Rodrigues Rosoni, Carla Suertegaray Fontana, Caio José Carlos. 2023: Timing of breeding as a determinant of nest success of the vulnerable Chestnut Seedeater (Sporophila cinnamomea) in grasslands of southern South America. Avian Research, 14(1): 100082. DOI: 10.1016/j.avrs.2023.100082
|
The breeding traits of Sporophila seedeaters have been relatively well studied in recent years; nevertheless, a group of ten species in the genus, known as southern capuchinos, remain understudied. That is the case with Chestnut Seedeater (Sporophila cinnamomea), a species vulnerable to extinction, which breeds in the grasslands of southeast South America and, after reproduction, migrates towards the Cerrado region in central Brazil. Here, we investigated breeding ecology and calculated average clutch size, productivity, the sex ratio of nestlings, and estimated nest success. Then we tested (1) whether there is a relationship between the number of active nests and environmental variables, (2) whether the nestling sex ratio deviates from the 1:1 ratio, (3) whether clutch size varies between breeding seasons, and (4) whether the nest success is related to starting date, nest age, plant support, nest height from the ground, and clutch size. During two breeding seasons (October–March 2018–2020), we monitored 98 nests. We generated survival models with five interacting covariates to assess the survival of the nests. We recorded the entire breeding period for Chestnut Seedeater, which was estimated to be 4.6 months, similar to other migratory seedeaters. Clutch size did not differ between breeding seasons. The sex ratio of nestlings was not significantly different from the 1:1 ratio. Nest success was 31%, and predation was the leading cause of unsuccessful nests (83%). The daily survival rate was 0.95 ± 0.01. The main predictor of nest survival was the covariate starting date. These findings, added to other aspects of the species' natural history described here, may help illuminate the ecology and behavior of Chestnut Seedeater and other southern endangered capuchinos, and grassland-dependent species of South America.
The most dominant global threat to natural forests and their biodiversity is land-cover change, which has negative impacts on both species persistence and ecosystem functions (Fahrig 2003; Tylianakis et al. 2008; Pogson 2015; Holyoak and Heath 2016). In Asia, many natural forests have been transformed to farmlands by local residents, resulting in several natural patches of forest within highly human-disturbed habitats (Foley et al. 2005; Haddad et al. 2015). Therefore, it is important to understand the effects of land-cover change on plant regeneration in these disturbed habitats (Cordeiro and Howe 2003; Markl et al. 2012; Bai et al. 2017).
In general, seed-dispersal interactions between animals and fleshy-fruited plants form the basis of plant regeneration, which is one of the key factors influencing the persistence of plant communities (Janzen 1970). In various disturbed habitats, the seed dispersal pattern of frugivorous birds directly reflects their functional traits, especially their morphological traits (Larsen et al. 2005; Suding et al. 2008; Schupp et al. 2010; Bregman et al. 2016; Farwig et al. 2017). As many ecologists predicted, the body size of birds can be used to estimate the ecological role of birds in seed removal and can affect the degree of species-specific interactions in seed-dispersal distance (Perez-Méndez et al. 2015; Bregman et al. 2016; Muñoz et al. 2017). Large-bodied birds can transport more seeds than small birds, and have the potential to facilitate seed dispersal among forest fragments (patches) owing to their longer dispersal distance (Spiegel and Nathan 2007; Wotton and Kelly 2012; Mueller et al. 2014; Li et al. 2017). However, increasing scientific evidence supports the concept that seed dispersal could be promoted by several bird functional traits (Schleuning et al. 2015; Muñoz et al. 2017). Thus, enhanced seed dispersal can be affected by not only bird morphological traits (e.g. body length, weight, wing length, tail length, etc.), but also by bird behavioural traits (e.g. foraging behaviour, flight behaviour, etc.) (Bregman et al. 2016; Farwig et al. 2017). Owing to the inherent difficulty of monitoring multiple bird functional traits in different disturbed habitats, empirical evidence supporting the extent of the role of bird functional traits in seed dispersal mutualism remains limited.
In the present study, we assessed the contributions of bird functional traits (behavioural traits: food habit, foraging pattern, foraging frequency, and habitat specialisation; morphological traits: weight, body length, wing length, and tail length) to both seed removal patterns and seed dispersal distance of an endangered and native tree species, Chinese yew (Taxus chinensis (Rehder and E.H. Wilson) Rehder), across farmland, patchy habitat, and natural habitat. We hypothesised that the seed removal patterns of these endangered trees vary across disturbed habitats and are strongly affected by bird foraging (behavioural) functional traits. In addition, we also tested how the bird flight (morphological) functional traits influence the seed dispersal distance across disturbed habitats.
Taxus chinensis is a dioecious, wind-pollinated species, distributed in evergreen broadleaf forests in China. Each year, female plants bear axillary cones, which develop into fleshy arils (commonly referred to as "fruits"), each containing a single seed, in autumn; an average Chinese yew tree bears more than 4000 fruits annually (Li et al. 2015, 2017).
We selected three populations of T. chinensis in the villages of Chongtou and Guihe, which are located in the southern experimental area of the Meihua Mountain National Nature Reserve (MMNNR), in southwest Fujian Province, China (25°15′-25°35′N, 116°45′-116°57′E). The composition of the three populations are as follows: (1) a farmland population from Guihe that consists of two remnant mother trees in Capsicum annuum farmland (northeast slope; slope angle 15°; altitude 1180 m; tree coverage 5%); (2) a natural population from Guihe that consists of ten mother trees scattered in the evergreen broadleaf forest (northwest slope; slope angle 32°; altitude 1178 m; tree coverage 80%); and (3) a patchy population, located in Chongtou, that contains the largest wild T. chinensis population in China (approximately 490 adults). This patch of T. chinensis is interlaced with patches of farmland, bamboo, mixed bamboo, and broadleaf trees to form a fragmented landscape (northeast slope; slope angle 27°; altitude 1218 m; tree coverage 70%) (Li et al. 2015).
To quantify how birds visited fruiting trees and how many seeds were removed from T. chinensis plants across the different sites, field observations were performed during the fruiting season (late October to early December) in all three habitats (farmland and natural habitat: 2012 and 2013; patchy habitat: 2011 and 2012). Observation points were located on opposing mountain slopes, and observations were made using a field scope (Leica 70, Leica Camera AG, Wetzlar, Germany) at distances ranging from 50 to 100 m. Each site was observed from 06:30 to 18:30 on observation days, for a total of 720 h of observation. During the observations, fruit-eating birds were identified and counted, and the foraging pattern (pecking, swallowing) and number of fruits they removed was recorded (i.e., fruits were either ingested on the tree or carried in the beak upon leaving the tree). From these records, we compared the number of seeds removed and frequency of foraging by frugivorous birds across the three habitats (number of fruits per visit × foraging frequencies) (Breitbach et al. 2010).
To quantify how far T. chinensis seeds were transported by birds, post-foraging movement behaviours of birds were studied in all three habitats (farmland, patchy, and natural). Each potential disperser leaving a given tree was tracked in a session that ended once visual contact was lost or if the focal bird could no longer be distinguished from its conspecifics. For each tracking session, the perching position of each bird was recorded every 30 s after it left the study tree, and observers noted nearby characteristic landmarks for subsequent verification of field distance estimates using a map. To estimate the real seed dispersal distance, we collected seeds that had been regurgitated by birds, and had fallen on the forest floor, the morning after an observation by finding the marked perching positions (regurgitated seeds refer to cleaned seeds without any aril that had been totally digested by birds) (Pan et al. 2016). We also assumed that the position in which the bird perched was a sufficient proxy for evaluating seed dispersal distance, as previously described (Breitbach et al. 2010). From these records, we compared seed dispersal distances across the three habitat types.
To quantify how bird functional traits affected seed dispersal patterns, we selected eight functional traits that are functionally related to the foraging and post-foraging flight behaviours of frugivorous birds (Moermond and Denslow 1985) as follows: foraging behaviours (food habit, foraging pattern, foraging frequency, weight, and length) and flight performance behaviours (wing length, tail length, weight, length, and habitat specialisation). All morphological traits were measured using two male and two female museum specimens of each bird species from local populations. In addition, data on food habits (frugivorous, omnivorous) and habitat specialisation (generalist, specialist) were compiled from A Field Guide to the Birds of China (MacKinnon et al. 2000). For the analyses, we used the mean measurement of each trait for each species. All morphological traits were log-transformed to approximate normality.
To quantify how bird functional traits affected seed removal, we first used a machine-learning algorithm (random forest model) to plot the partial effects of food habit, foraging pattern, foraging frequency, weight, body length, site, and year against the number of seeds removed (R package Random Forest) (Breiman 2001). Moreover, we also used the random forest model to plot the partial effects of bird flight traits (wing length, tail length, weight, body length, and habitat specialisation) on seed dispersal distance (R package Random Forest) (Breiman 2001).
During the fruiting season, 5106 seeds (2012: 2341 seeds; 2013: 2765 seeds), 1091 seeds (2012: 719 seeds; 2013: 372 seeds), and 10, 277 seeds (2011: 4704 seeds; 2012: 5573 seeds) were removed by 15, 13, and 22 bird species in the farmland, natural habitat, and patchy habitat, respectively. More seeds were removed from the patchy habitat than from the other two habitats. The most common forager at the farmland site was the Collared Finchbill (Spizixos semitorques) (2012: 42 foraging events, 714 seeds; 2013: 40 foraging events, 690 seeds), whereas the Orange-bellied Leafbird (Chloropsis hardwickii) (2012: 23 foraging events, 184 seeds; 2013: 15 foraging events, 165 seeds) and Black Bulbul (Hypsipetes leucocephalus) (2011: 233 foraging events, 3728 seeds; 2012: 253 foraging events, 4048 seeds) were the most common foragers in the natural and patchy habitats, respectively. These birds were also the most common dispersers for T. chinensis, as determined by rates of seed removal from the three habitat types.
In addition, seeds were removed and taken to greater distances from the farmland than from the other two habitats. Dispersal distance (farmland: 65 m; natural habitat: 50 m; patchy habitat: 60 m) and mean dispersal distance (farmland: 15.2 m; natural habitat: 8.1 m; patchy habitat: 13.8 m) for seeds from the farmland site were greater than those of the other two habitats (Fig. 1).
Considering the contributions of bird foraging traits to seed removal, the results of the random forest analysis showed 85.74% of seed removal data could be explained by eight variables: bird foraging frequency, weight, body length, food habit, site, year, habitat specialisation and foraging pattern. Only three variables (bird foraging frequency, food habit and site) significantly affected seed removal patterns. The results showed a clear positive association between bird foraging frequency and number of seeds removed (Fig. 2a). The contribution by frugivores to seed removal was higher than that by omnivorous birds (Fig. 2b), and more seeds were removed from the farmland site (Fig. 2c).
During field-based observations, a total of 687 seed dispersal distances were confirmed. Considering the contribution of bird flight traits to seed dispersal distance, 22.45% of seed dispersal distance could be explained by six variables (wing length, tail length, weight, body length, site and habitat specialisation). Three variables (bird tail length, wing length, and site) significantly affected seed removal patterns. The results of the random forest analysis demonstrated clear positive associations of bird tail (Fig. 3a) and wing length (Fig. 3b) with seed dispersal distance. The dispersal distance from the three habitat types differed, where the longest dispersal distances were observed at both the patchy habitat and the farmland site (Fig. 3c).
To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to find that T. chinensis trees have the ability to form seed dispersal mutualisms with local birds across different disturbed habitats. As a consequence of these mutualisms, more seeds were removed by birds from the patchy habitat than from the other two habitats (Fig. 1). The number of seeds removed increased with bird foraging frequency (Fig. 2a). Moreover, the dispersal distances from the three habitats differed, where the longest dispersal distances were observed at both the patchy habitat and the farmland site (Fig. 3c). Seed dispersal distance increased with bird tail and wing length (Fig. 3a, b).
There are several possible reasons to explain why more T. chinensis seeds were removed by birds at the patchy habitat, mostly involving the habitat features of the patchy habitat. First, the community structure of the patchy habitat was simple, which could attract more birds to forage and remove the seeds (Breitbach et al. 2010). In addition, the co-fruiting plants found in the patchy habitat may have helped to attract birds to the vicinity of the focal trees (Schupp et al. 2010). Moreover, the longer dispersal distance observed at the farmland site (Fig. 1) could have been related to the lack of perching trees in this disturbed habitat. As a consequence, birds had to fly farther to find trees to perch on (Cody 1985).
Foraging behavioural traits strongly affected bird seed removal patterns across the three habitats (Fig. 2), which could be explained by both bird and plant traits (Farwig et al. 2017). For the bird perspective, it has been shown that medium-sized birds are not as sensitive to disturbance as large-bodied birds (Moore and Swihart 2007; Breitbach et al. 2010), as the remaining forests still provide adequate shelter and food for the persistence of medium-sized birds in disturbed habitats. For the plant perspective, plant traits of T. chinensis also determined the persistence of birds in disturbed habitats, thus affecting the foraging behaviour of birds (Farwig et al. 2017; Muñoz et al. 2017). Crop size, fruit size, and height of T. chinensis could be good advertisements that attract birds (crop size: 4000 per mother tree; fruit weight: 7 g; height: 25‒45 m) (Jordano and Schupp 2000; Martinez et al. 2008; Herrera and García 2009; Li et al. 2017). As a consequence, most of the bird species preferred to forage the "fruit" of this plant, and therefore chose the plant as their main food, which in turn determined the seed removal rate across the three habitats. Thus, the characteristics of the yew tree are a better predictor of seed removal rate in different habitats.
Furthermore, our results showed that seed dispersal distance increased with bird tail and wing length in all three different habitats (Fig. 3). Wing length played an important role in determining the dispersal distance of the birds in the present study, and was an indicator of the role of the birds' flight ability in dispersal distance, as the birds' flight ability has been shown to increase with increasing wing length (Muñoz et al. 2017). Thus, wing length exerts a positive effect on seed dispersal distance. Our results also highlighted the interaction between bird tail length and seed dispersal distance. Tail length affects the ability to steer, and thus the forest specialisation of the birds. Birds with long tail length have been shown to exhibit both high tolerance to forest adaptation and high potential for flight (Fahrig 2007; Li et al. 2017), thus resulting in their long dispersal distances in all habitats.
Our results highlight the importance of the functional traits of birds in the seed dispersal patterns of endangered trees across disturbed habitats. Bird behavioural traits could determine the ecological role of the species in seed removal, while morphological traits of birds may affect the level of the species-specific contribution to seed dispersal distance across disturbed habitats.
NL, ZW and ZL designed the study. NL performed data collection. NL, and XL conducted all statistical analyses. All authors contributed to the writing and editing of the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
We thank Zhongwei Zheng and Tianshi Xiong for their contributions in the field work.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
The datasets used in the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Not applicable.
The experiments comply with the current laws of China in which they were performed.
|
Aguilar, T.M., Leite, L.O., Marini, M. Â., 1999. Biologia da nidificação de Lathrotriccus euleri (Cabanis, 1968) (Tyrannidae) em fragmentos de mata de Minas Gerais. Ararajuba 7, 125-133.
|
|
Azpiroz, A.B., Alfaro, M., Jimenez, S., 2012a. Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay: Una evaluación del estado de conservación de la avifauna nacional con base en los criterios de la IUCN. Dirección Naciónal de Medio Ambiente, Montevideo.
|
|
Biagolini-Jr, C., Macedo, R.H., 2021. Philornis infection in blue-black grassquits: impact on nestlings and risk factors involved. J. Avian Biol. 52, 1-20.
|
|
Böhning-Gaese, K., Halbe, B., Lemoine, N., Oberrth, R., 2000. Factors influencing the clutch size, number of broods and annual fecundity of North American and European land birds. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2, 823-839.
|
|
Browne, M., Turbek, S.P., Pasian, C., Di Giacomo, A.S., 2021. Low reproductive success of the endangered Iberá Seedeater in its only known breeding site, the Iberá Wetlands, Argentina. Ornithol. Appl. 123, duab008.
|
|
Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R., 2002. In: Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A
Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, second ed. Springer-Verlag, New York.
|
|
Cavalcanti, L.M.P., Paiva, L.V., França, L.F., 2016. Effects of rainfall on bird reproduction in a semi-arid Neotropical region. Zoologia 33, e20160018.
|
|
Coppack, T., Pulido, F., 2004. Photoperiodic response and the adaptability of avian life cycles to environmental change. Adv. Ecol. Res. 35, 131-150.
|
|
Di Giacomo, A.G., 2005. Aves de la Reserva El Bagual. In: Di Giacomo, A.G.,
Krapovickas, S.F. (Eds.), Temas de Naturaleza y Conservación. Monografía de Aves Argentinas, Buenos Aires, pp. 201–465.
|
|
Di Giacomo, A.S., Di Giacomo, A.G., 2004. Extincion, historia natural y conservación de las poblaciones del Yetapa de Collar (Alectrurus risora) en la Argentina. Ornitol. Neotrop. 15, 145-157.
|
|
Di Giacomo, A.S., Kopuchian, C., 2016. Una nueva especie de Capuchino (Sporophila: Thraupidae) de los Esteros del Iberá, Corrientes, Argentina. Nuestras Aves 61, 3-5.
|
|
Dias, A.F.S., Maia, R., Dias, R.I., 2009. Breeding strategies of Tropical birds. In: Del
Claro, K., Oliveira, P.S., Rico-Gray, V. (Eds.), Tropical Biology and Conservation
Management – Vol. Ⅷ. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Oxford, UK,
pp. 1–30.
|
|
Dinsmore, S.J., Dinsmore, J.J., 2007. Modeling avian nest survival in program MARK. Stud. Avian Biol. 34, 73-83.
|
|
Dubiec, A., Zagalska-Neubauer, M., 2006. Molecular techniques for sex identification in birds. Biol. Lett. 43, 3-12.
|
|
Duca, C., Marini, M. Â., 2014. High survival and low fecundity of a Neotropical savanna tanager. Emu 114, 121-128.
|
|
Dunn, P.O., 2004. Breeding dates and reproductive performance. Adv. Ecol. Res. 35, 69-87.
|
|
Farner, D.D., 1972. Breeding Biology of Birds: Proceedings of a Symposium on Breeding Behavior and Reproductive Physiology in Birds. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D. C.
|
|
Fierro-Calderón, K., Loaiza-Muñoz, M., Sánchez-Martínez, M.A., Ocampo, D., David, S., Greeney, H.F., et al., 2021. Methods for collecting data about the breeding biology of Neotropical birds. J. Field Ornithol. 92, 315-341.
|
|
Fontana, C.S., Bencke, G.A., 2015. Biodiversidade de aves. In: Pillar, V.P., Lange, O. (Eds.), Os Campos Do Sul. Rede de Campos Sulinos - UFRGS, Porto Alegre, pp. 93-99.
|
|
Fowler, J., Cohen, L., 1995. Statistics for Ornithologists, BTO Guide. British Trust for Ornithology, Tring, UK.
|
|
França, L.F., Figueiredo-Paixão, V.H., Duarte-Silva, T.A., Santos, K.B., 2020. The effects of rainfall and arthropod abundance on breeding season of insectivorous birds, in a semi-arid neotropical environment. Zoologia 37, e37716.
|
|
Freitas, M.S., 2014. Biologia reprodutiva, seleção de sítios de nidificação e sucesso reprodutivo em aves campestres de cerrado na Estação Ecológica de Itirapina, SP. Master's thesis. Universidade de São Paulo.
|
|
Guan, H., Wen, Y., Wang, P., Lv, L., Xu, J., Li, J., 2018. Seasonal increase of nest height of the Silver-throated Tit (Aegithalos glaucogularis): can it reduce predation risk? Avian Res. 9, 1-8.
|
|
Hensler, G.L., Nichols, J.D., 1981. The Mayfield method of estimating nesting succes: a model, estimators and simulation results. Wilson Bull. 93, 42-53.
|
|
ICMBio [Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade], 2018. Livro Vermelho da Fauna Brasileira Ameaçada de Extinção, I. ICMBio/MMA, Brasília.
|
|
ICMBio [Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade], 2021. Plano de Ação Naciónal para Conservação das Aves dos Campos Sulinos, Portaria do PAN - Portaria n° 856, de 26 de dezembro de 2017. Brasília.
|
|
Lack, D., 1948. The significance of clutch-size. Part Ⅲ: Some interspecific comparisons. Ibis. 90, 25-45.
|
|
MADS [Ministerio del Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible], 2019. Resolución N° 254, de 09 de maio de 2019. Lista de Aves Protegidas de la Vida Silvestre (Paraguay).
|
|
Marini, M. Â., Duca, C., Maníca, L.T., 2010. Técnicas de pesquisa em biologia reprodutiva de aves. In: Von Matter, S., Straube, F.C., Accordi, I., Piacentini, V. de Q., Cândido-Jr., J.F. (Eds.), Ornitologia e Conservação: Ciência Aplicada, Técnicas de Pesquisa e Levantamento. Technical Books Editora, Rio de Janeiro, pp. 297-312.
|
|
Marini, M. Â., Sousa, N.O., Borges, F.J.A., Silveira, M.B., 2009. Biologia reprodutiva de Elaenia cristata (Aves: Tyrannidae) em cerrado do Brasil central. Neotrop. Biol. Conserv. 4, 3-12.
|
|
Marini, M.A., Vasconcellos, M.M., Lobo, Y., 2014. Reproductive biology and territoriality of the Wedge-tailed Grass-finch (Emberizoides herbicola) (Aves: Passeriformes). Biosci. J. 30, 853-862.
|
|
Martin, T.E., Scott, J., Menge, C., 2000. Nest predation increases with parental activity: separating nest site and parental activity effects. Proc. R. Soc. B 267, 2287-2293.
|
|
Martin, T.E., Martin, P.R., Olson, C.R., Heidinger, B.J., Fontaine, J.J., 2000. Parental care and clutch sizes in North and South American birds. Science. 287, 1482-1485.
|
|
Maurício, G.N., Bencke, G.A., Repenning, M., Machado, D.B., Dias, R.A., Bugoni, L., 2013. Review of the breeding status of birds in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Iheringia. Série Zool. 103, 163-184.
|
|
MAyDS y AA [Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable de la Nación y Aves Argentinas], 2015. Categorización de las Aves de la Argentina. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
|
|
Mayfield, H.F., 1975. Suggestions for calculating nest success. Wilson Bull. 87, 456-466.
|
|
Meireles, R.C., Lopes, L.E., Pichorim, M., Machoado, T.L.S.S., Duca, C., Solar, R., 2021. Nest survival of the threatened Campo Miner Geositta poeciloptera: a tropical cavity-nesting grassland bird. Austral Ecol. 46, 1236-1245.
|
|
R Core Team, 2020. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
|
|
Repenning, M., 2012. História natural, com ênfase na biologia reprodutiva, de uma população migratória de Sporophila aff. plumbea (Aves; Emberizidae) do sul do Brasil. Master's thesis. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
|
|
Repenning, M., Fontana, C.S., 2016. Breeding biology of the Tropeiro Seedeater (Sporophila beltoni). Auk 133, 484-496.
|
|
Ricklefs, R.E., Bloom, G., 1977. Components of avian breeding productivity. Auk 94, 86-96.
|
|
Ridgely, R.S., Tudor, G., 1989. The Birds of South America. University of Texas Press, Austin.
|
|
Rosoni, J.R.R., Fontana, C.S., Carlos, C.J., 2020. Nests, eggs, clutch size, and nestlings of the Chestnut Seedeater (Sporophila cinnamomea), a vulnerable species of South America. Wilson J. Ornithol. 132, 998-1007.
|
|
Rosoni, J.R.R., 2022. Caboclinho-de-chapéu-cinzento Sporophila cinnamomea (Aves: Passeriformes) o que faz no Pampa e para onde vai no Cerrado? História natural com enfâse em biologia reprodutiva, distribuição e migração. Doctor's thesis. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
|
|
Rotella, J., 2021. Nest survival models. In: Cooch, E.G., White, G.C. (Eds.), Program MARK - A 'Gentle Introduction'. Ithaca, New York, pp. 1-19.
|
|
Rovedder, C.E., 2011. História natural de Sporophila melanogaster (Pelzen 1870) (Aves: Emberizidae) com ênfase em sua biologia reprodutiva. Master's thesis. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
|
|
Silva, J.M.C., 1999. Seasonal movements and conservation of seedeaters of the genus Sporophila in South America. Stud. Avian Biol. 19, 272-280.
|
|
Skutch, A.F., 1949. Do tropical birds rear as many young as they can nourish? Ibis 91, 430-455.
|
|
Skutch, A.F., 1966. A breeding bird census and nesting success in Central America. Ibis. 108, 1-16.
|
|
Slagsvold, T., 1982. Clutch size variation in passerine birds: The nest predation hypothesis. Oecologia 54, 159-169.
|
|
Stutchbury, B.J.M., Morton, E.S., 2001. Behavioral Ecology of Tropical Birds. Academic Press, London.
|
|
Vizentin-Bugoni, J., Areta, J.I., Di Giacomo, A.G., Di Giacomo, A.S., Jacobs, F., Coimbra, M.A.A., Dias, R.A., 2013. Breeding biology and conservation of the Marsh Seedeater Sporophila palustris. Bird Conserv. Int. 23, 147-158.
|
|
White, G.C., Burnham, K.P., 1999. Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46, 120-139.
|
|
Winter, M., Hawks, S.E., Shaffer, J.A., Johnson, D.H., 2003. Guidelines for finding nests of passerine birds in tallgrass prairie. Prairie Nat. 35, 197-211.
|
| 1. | Guohai Wang, Yang Huang, Wei Yao, et al. Structure and characteristics of the plant-frugivore bird network from the Guilin Botanical Garden. PeerJ, 2023, 11: e15028. DOI:10.7717/peerj.15028 |
Figures(4) / Tables(6)
DownLoad:
Email Alerts
RSS Feeds