
Citation: | Yuxi Wang, Iderbat Damba, Qingshan Zhao, Yanbo Xie, Xueqing Deng, Rdi Ga, Guanhua Liu, Zhiwen Xu, Yue Li, Dali Gao, Wenbin Xu, Guoxun Chen, Lei Cao. 2021: Organising a juvenile ratio monitoring programme for 10 key waterbird species in the Yangtze River floodplain: analysis and proposals. Avian Research, 12(1): 72. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-021-00309-x |
In the face of continued degradation and loss of wetlands in the Yangtze River floodplain (YRF), there is an urgent need to monitor the abundance and distribution of wintering waterbirds. To understand fully observed annual changes, we need to monitor demographic rates to understand factors affecting global population size. Annual reproduction success contributes to dynamic changes in population size and age structure, so an assessment of the juvenile ratio (i.e. first winter birds as a proportion of total number aged) of overwintering waterbirds can be an important indicator of the reproductive success in the preceding breeding season.
During 2016–2019, we sampled juvenile ratios among 10 key waterbird species from the wetlands in the YRF. Based on these data, we here attempt to establish a simple, efficient, focused and reliable juvenile ratio monitoring scheme, to assess consistently and accurately relative annual breeding success and its contribution to the age structure among these waterbird species.
We compared juvenile ratio data collected throughout the winter and found that the optimal time for undertaking these samples was in the early stages of arrival for migratory waterbirds reaching their wintering area (early to mid-December). We recommend counting consistently at key points (i.e. those where > 1% biogeographical flyway population were counted) at sites of major flyway importance (Poyang Lake, East Dongting Lake, Shengjin Lake, Caizi Lake, Longgan Lake and Chen Lake). Based on this, the error rate of the programme (155 planned points, the count of 10 waterbird species is 826–8955) is less than 5%.
We established a juvenile ratio monitoring programme for 10 key waterbird species in the wetlands of the YRF, and discuss the feasibility and necessity of implementing such a future programme, and how to use these data in our monitoring and understanding of the population dynamics of these waterbird populations.
Correction to: Avian Res (2021) 12:19
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-021-00254-9
Following publication of the original article (Hou et al. 2021), the authors identified an error in Fig. 1. The correct figure is given below.
The original article (Hou et al. 2021) has been updated.
Ao PR, Wang X, Solovyeva D, Meng FJ, Ikeuchi T, Shimada T, et al. Rapid decline of the geographically restricted and globally threatened Eastern Palearctic Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus. Wildfowl. 2020;9: 206-43.
|
Baldassarre G. Ducks, geese, and swans of North America. New York: JHU Press; 2014.
|
Barter M, Chen L, Cao L, Lei G. Waterbird survey of the middle and lower Yangtze River floodplain in late January and early February 2004. Beijing: China Forestry Pulishing House; 2004.
|
Barter M, Lei G, Cao L. Waterbird survey of the middle and lower Yangtze River floodplain (February 2005). Beijing: World Wildlife Fund-China & China Forestry Publishing House; 2006.
|
Batbayar N, Takekawa JY, Newman SH, Prosser DJ, Natsagdorj T, Xiao XM. Migration strategies of Swan Geese Anser cygnoides from northeast Mongolia. Wildfowl. 2013;61: 90-109.
|
BirdLife International. BirdLife International and handbook of the birds of the world (2017) Bird species distribution maps of the world. 2017.
|
Brazil M. Birds of East Asia: China, Taiwan, Korea, Japan, and Russia. New York: A & C Black; 2009.
|
Bromley RGH, Rothe TC. Conservation assessment for the dusky Canada goose (Branta canadensis occidentalis Baird). US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station; 2003.
|
Cao L, Barter M, Lei G, Yang Q. Anatidae in the Yangtze floodplain in winter 2004 and 2005. Casarca. 2008;11: 146-60.
|
Cowardin LM, Blohm RJ. Breeding population inventories and measures of recruitment. In: Batt BDJ, Afton AD, Anderson MG, Ankney CD, Johnson DH, Kadlec JA, Krapu GL, editors. Ecology and management of breeding waterfowl. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1992. p. 423-45.
|
Deng XQ, Zhao QS, Solovyeva D, Lee H, Harmey IB, Xu ZG, et al. Contrasting trends in two East Asian populations of the Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons. Wildfowl. 2020;6: 181-205.
|
Fang L, Zhang JJ, Zhao QS, Solovyeva D, Vangeluwe D, Rozenfeld SB, et al. Two distinct flyways with different population trends of Bewick's Swan Cygnus columbianus bewickii in East Asia. Wildfowl. 2020;6: 13-42.
|
Gregory RD, Gibbons DW, Donald PF. Bird census and survey techniques. Bird Ecol Conserv. 2004;17: 56.
|
Howes C, Symes CT, Byholm P. Highly skewed sex and juvenile ratios of European Honey Buzzard in southern Africa. J Ornithol. 2019;1: 10.
|
Johnson DH, Nichols JD, Schwartz MD, et al. Population dynamics of breeding waterfowl. In: Batt DJ, Afton AD, Anderson MG, Ankney CD, Johnson DH, Kadlec JA, et al., editors. Ecology and management of breeding waterfowl. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1992. p. 446-85.
|
Lambeck RHD. Differences in migratory pattern and habitat choice between social classes of the Brent Goose Branta bernicla bernicla. Ardea. 1990;78: 426-40.
|
Rees EC, Fox AD. Flyways, population trends and conservation challenges for the Anatidae in Far East Asia. Wildfowl. 2020;6: 1-319.
|
Wetlands International. Waterbird population estimates. 2021. wpe. wetlands. org. Accessed 13 Feb 2021.
|
Yang XL, Jiang HX, Zou CL, Wang Y, Lin BQ, Li LS. Changes in migration pattern and important stopover sites of the eastern population of Siberian Cranes. For Sci. 2020;56: 123-33 (In Chinese).
|
1. | Yunzhu Liu, Lan Wu, Jia Guo, et al. Habitat selection and food choice of White-naped Cranes (Grus vipio) at stopover sites based on satellite tracking and stable isotope analysis. Avian Research, 2022, 13: 100060. DOI:10.1016/j.avrs.2022.100060 |
2. | Kunpeng Yi, Junjian Zhang, Nyambayar Batbayar, et al. Using Tracking Data to Identify Gaps in Knowledge and Conservation of the Critically Endangered Siberian Crane (Leucogeranus leucogeranus). Remote Sensing, 2022, 14(20): 5101. DOI:10.3390/rs14205101 |
3. | Ross Ahmed, Tomas Aarvak, Nicholas D. Sly, et al. Birds of the World. DOI:10.2173/bow.lwfgoo.02 |