Csaba MOSKÁT, Fugo TAKASU, A. Roman MUÑOZ, Hiroshi NAKAMURA, Miklós BÁN, Zoltán BARTA. 2012: Cuckoo parasitism on two closely-related Acrocephalus warblers in distant areas: a case of parallel coevolution?. Avian Research, 3(4): 320-329. DOI: 10.5122/cbirds.2012.0038
Citation: Csaba MOSKÁT, Fugo TAKASU, A. Roman MUÑOZ, Hiroshi NAKAMURA, Miklós BÁN, Zoltán BARTA. 2012: Cuckoo parasitism on two closely-related Acrocephalus warblers in distant areas: a case of parallel coevolution?. Avian Research, 3(4): 320-329. DOI: 10.5122/cbirds.2012.0038

Cuckoo parasitism on two closely-related Acrocephalus warblers in distant areas: a case of parallel coevolution?

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Csaba Moskát, E-mail: moskat@nhmus.hu

  • Received Date: 22 Nov 2012
  • Accepted Date: 08 Dec 2012
  • Available Online: 23 Apr 2023
  • Common Cuckoos (Cuculus canorus) parasitize nests of small passerines. The Cuckoo chicks cause the death of their nest-mates when evicting eggs or nestlings from the nests; consequently, hosts suffer from a high loss of reproduction. Host adaptations against parasitism, e.g., by egg discrimination behavior, and cuckoo counter-adaptations to hosts, e.g., by mimetic eggs, are often regarded as a result of the arms race between the two interacting species. In Hungary Great Reed Warblers (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) are the main hosts of cuckoos, suffering from heavy parasitism (ca. 40-65%). The Oriental Reed Warbler (A. orientalis), formerly a subspecies of the Great Reed Warbler (A. a. orientalis), is also a highly parasitized host in Japan (25-40%). We compared main characteristics of Cuckoo parasitism in these two distant areas from the Western and Eastern Palearctic by comparing cuckoo egg mimicry. We measured color characteristics of host and parasitic eggs by spectrophotometer. Visual modeling revealed lower chromatic distances between Cuckoo and host eggs in Hungary than in Japan, but high variation both in host and Cuckoo eggs may cause matching problems in Hungary. Achromatic (brightness) difference between host and Cuckoo eggs were lower in Japan than in Hungary, and it proved to be the most important factor affecting egg rejection. Hosts rejected Cuckoo eggs at similar frequencies (37% and 35% in Hungary and Japan, respectively). Host adaptation, i.e., egg rejection behavior, seems to be preceding Cuckoo counter-adaptations to hosts in Japan. We suggest that the Cuckoo-Great/Oriental Reed Warbler relationships developed in alternative ways in Japan and Hungary, and they represent different stages of their arms race.

  • The Crested Ibis (Nipponia nippon, Plates Ⅰ and ) (Ciconiiformes: Threskiornithidae) is a medium-sized wading bird, ranging in length from 57.5 to 84.0 cm, with a longish neck and legs, a red featherless face with a crested white head. Its most distinctive morphological character is the long, slender and decurved bill, perfectly adapted for probing in water and mud, or even in cracks on dry ground. The non-breeding adult is white, with orange cinnamon tones in the tail and flight-feathers. The long bill is black with a red tip. Its red legs do not extend beyond the tail in flight (Hoyo et al., 1992).

      Plate Ⅰ.  Crested Ibis (Nipponia nippon). (a) Crested Ibis in flight; (b) Young Crested Ibis (photos by Zhinong Xi).
      Plate Ⅱ.  Crested Ibis (Nipponia nippon). (a) Non-breeding Crested Ibis (photo by Changqing Ding); (b) Feeding the chicks (photo by Jingquan Jiao); (c) Adult and fledglings (photo by Changqing Ding).

    The Crested Ibis is categorized as Endangered (EN) in the IUCN Red List (BirdLife International, 2001) and is listed in Appendix Ⅰ of CITES. It is also ranked as a first class national key protected animal in China (Zheng and Wang, 1998; Ding, 2004).

    The Crested Ibis was widespread and locally common in North-East Asia until the late nineteenth century, when it was breeding in far eastern Russia, Japan and mainland China and was a presumed non-breeding visitor to the Korea Peninsula and Taiwan Island (Fig. 1). The population of the Crested Ibis rapidly declined in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, related to deforestation of pine woodlands as nesting habitat, human persuit, especially over-hunting, drying out of wetland and the abuse of chemical fertilizers and pesticides in paddy fields during the 1950's. This species was even evaluated as extinct in the wild (EW) when the last five wild birds in Japan were caught into captivity in 1981.

    Figure  1.  Distribution of Crested Ibis (Imitated from BirdLife International, 2001)

    In China, the last specimen was collected in Gansu Province in 1964, after which there were no records for a long time (Ding, 2004). In May 1981, after three years of a nation-wide survey, a tiny wild population of seven birds (two pairs and three fledglings) was re-discovered in Yangxian, Shaanxi Province in central China and renewed hope for this species (Liu, 1981).

    After the rediscovery of the wild population, the Chinese government and authorities have made great efforts for the conservation of the Crested Ibis and its habitats. The Shaanxi Crested Ibis Nature Reserve was established in 1990 and this magnificent bird has since been the focus of intensive conservation efforts. The seven original birds are the source of all present Crested Ibis populations, both in the wild and in captivity. Now there is only one wild population remaining in the world, located in Yangxian and nearby counties in Shaanxi Province and has been gradually recovering to more than 600 birds in 2007 (Fig. 2) (Zhang and Ding, 2008). One reintroduced population of about 20 birds has been established in Ningshan County, Shaanxi Province since 2007.

    Figure  2.  Population size of the wild Crested Ibis from 1981 to 2007

    Six fledglings were taken from the wild to initiate a captive population in Beijing Zoo before 1986, where the first successful breeding was achieved in 1989 (Li, 1991). Another captive rearing and breeding program began at the Shaanxi Crested Ibis Breeding Centre in 1990 with the rescue of sick or injured chicks and the collection of some of the eggs deserted by parental birds in the wild (Xi et al., 2002). There are now five captive populations with a total of about 600 birds in the Beijing Zoo, Yangxian and Zhouzhi counties of Shaanxi Province, the Dongzhai Nature Reserve of Henan Province and in Deqing County of Zhejiang Province.

    The annual activity of the Crested Ibis can be divided into a breeding season (February to June), a wandering season (July to October) and a wintering season (November to January) (Wang and Shi, 2000). The breeding areas are located in middle and lower mountains with wintering paddy fields, nesting on tall trees, close to villages. The position of the nest sites is closely related to the availability of feeding grounds and many nests are built close to human settlements, often less than 100 m and sometimes the nest tree is only a few meters from a human settlement. The trunks of nest trees (and adjacent trees) are covered with plastic cloth or razor blades to prevent snakes from climbing up and nets are placed under the nests to catch any chicks that fall out (Ding and Li, 2005).

    The mating system is monogamous. Male and female birds both contribute to nesting, hatching and feeding chicks. Pairs will use the same nesting territory if not disturbed. In the past they were observed to re-use old nests but most pairs now build new nests every year (Shi et al., 2001).

    The wild population no longer migrates, only making short flights to feed in paddy fields below 700 m during the winter and moving to higher elevations (up to 1200 m) to nest in the spring. During the wandering season, the birds move about 25 km (15−45 km) from their breeding areas to planes along the Hanjiang River. They move back to their breeding areas during the wintering season. During the non-breeding season, the ibises gather in flocks for feeding and roosting.

    Breeding starts in late February to early March, with laying from mid March to early April. Nests are flimsy stick platforms, lined with small twigs, leaves and hay, built on branches of trees (Pinus massoniana, Quercus variabilis, chestnut or poplar), at heights of 4−22 m. Usually there are 3−4 eggs per nest, the incubation period is about 28 days; chicks have gray down, white below and become fledglings after 40−45 days. The young birds are sexually mature in 2−3 years. Captive birds in Japan have lived to become 37 years old.

    The size of the home range averages 100.8 ± 49.8 ha (according to MCP method) and 175.6 ± 91.3 ha (according to 90% Kernel method); the breeding home range of different pairs overlaps about 24.5 ± 27.3% and some pairs can overlap up to 46.8−64.3% (Liu et al., 2003).

    The success of fledglings from the wild population was only 11% in the early 1980s, but with effective conservation measures taken since then, it increased to 53% in the late 1990s (Shi and Cao, 2001). Because a high proportion of the wild population consists of young birds that have not yet started to breed (Lu et al., 2000), it is predicted that the wild population of the Crested Ibis will continue to increase and that they will expand their breeding range. The distribution area has been increased from less than 100 km2 to more than 3000 km2 at present. The discovery of a nesting pair in Xixiang County of Shannxi Province in 1999 provides evidence for such an expansion (Ding et al., 1999). Figure 3 shows the dispersal of breeding sites from 20 nests in 1999 to 102 nests in 2007 (Zhang and Ding, 2008).

    Figure  3.  Nest site distribution of Crested Ibis showing the dispersal of the wild population (a: 1999, b: 2007).

    Birds forage during the daytime in small flocks, probe into mud or shallow water with their bill, or pick up prey from the ground. The diet consists of freshwater fish (loaches and eels), amphibians (frogs, newts and salamanders), crustaceans, freshwater mollusks and insects, especially grasshoppers, crickets and adults and larvae of aquatic beetles.

    In winter, the main feeding habitats are paddy fields, riverbanks and reservoirs, mainly close to human settlements. Birds seem able to tolerate human activities in these areas (Ma et al., 2001). The areas where they currently breed are at 470–1300 m elevation (Ma et al., 2001), but elders in Yangxian reported that, prior to the 1940s, they were usually found at lower elevations in areas with slow-flowing rivers. In recent years, they have tended to move into new nesting sites at lower elevations in this area (Zhai et al., 2001), presumably indicating that this relict population had become confined to suboptimal upland areas but is now expanding back into more typical lowland habitats.

    The use of fertilizer and pesticides usually causes pollution in feeding areas and threatens food diversity and richness of the Crested Ibis, especially in the chick hatching period. Research has indicated that food shortage is a major factor affecting the chick survival rate (Ding, 2004). Food supplementation in paddy fields is an effective measure during the breeding season.

    Since there is only one wild population in the world, found in a very limited area, the Crested Ibis cannot avoid being threatened. If wildlife diseases (such as New Castle disease and bird flu), climate disasters (such as heavy snow and extreme drought during breeding season) and outbreaks of pollution in feeding areas, the wild population of the Crested Ibis will be faced with a serious threat to its survival. It is urgently required to conduct a reintroduction program to establish a second and third wild population in other areas (Ding and Li, 2005).

    At present, with the development of captive breeding populations, there are enough captive birds reserved for release into the wild. In 2004, the State Forestry Administration (SFA) organized a survey for reintroduction sites in China (Ding and Li, 2005). GIS techniques were used to detect potential suitable breeding sites for the Crested Ibis (Liu et al., 2006). Since then, four captive populations have been established for wild training in Huayang, Ningshan, Dongzhai and Deqing. Where could potential reintroduction places be found?

    In October 2004, a small captive population was transferred to Huayang, a higher elevation area in Yangxian, for wild training. Up to 2006, 23 birds were released. Now the released birds have joined the local wild population and eight of them bred successfully in seven nests in 2010.

    In May 2007, 26 birds were released in Ningshan County, Shaanxi Province. It was the first reintroduction attempt of the Crested Ibis. With 16 more birds released later, there are more than 20 birds surviving in Ningshan and five pairs of them bred with six fledglings surviving in 2009 (XY Chang, unpublished data).

  • Andou D, Nakamura H, Oomori S, Higuchi H. 2005. Characteristics of brood parasitism by Common Cuckoos on Azurewinged Magpies, as illustrated by video recordings. Avian Sci, 4:43–48.
    Antonov A, Stokke BG, Vikan JR, Fossøy F, Ranke PS, Røskaft E, Moksnes A, Møller AP, Shykoff JA. 2010. Egg phenotype differentiation in sympatric cuckoo Cuculus canorus gentes. J Evol Biol, 23:1170–1182.
    Avilés JM, Soler JJ, Soler M, Møller AP. 2006. Rapid increase in cuckoo egg matching in a recently parasitized reed warbler population. J Evol Biol, 19:1901–1910.
    Avilés JM. 2008. Egg colour mimicry in the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus as revealed by modelling host retinal function. Proc R Soc B, 275:2345–2352.
    Báldi A, Kisbenedek T. 2000. Bird species numbers in an archipelago of reeds at Lake Velence, Hungary. Global Ecol Biogeogr, 9:451–461.
    Bán M, Barta Z, Muñoz RA, Takasu F, Nakamura H, Moskát C. 2011. The analysis of common cuckoo's egg shape in relation to its hosts' in two geographically distant areas. J Zool, 284:77–83.
    Barabás L, Gilicze B, Takasu F, Moskát C. 2004. Survival and antiparasite defense in a host metapopulation under heavy brood parasitism: a source-sink dynamic model. J Ethol, 22:143–151.
    Bártol I, Karcza Z, Moskát C, Røskaft E, Kisbenedek T. 2002. Responses of great reed warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus to experimental brood parasitism: the effects of a cuckoo Cuculus canorus dummy and egg mimicry. J Avian Biol, 33:420–425.
    Begum S, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Stokke BG. 2011. Interactions between the Asian koel (Eudynamys scolopacea) and its hosts. Behaviour, 148:325–340.
    Bennett ATD, Cuthill IC. 1994. Ultraviolet vision in birds: what is its function? Vision Res, 34:1471–1478.
    Brooke M de L, Davies NB. 1988. Egg mimicry by Cuckoos Cuculus canorus in relation to discrimination by hosts. Nature, 335:630–632.
    Cassey P, Honza M, Grim T, Hauber ME. 2008. The modelling of avian visual perception predicts behavioural rejection responses to foreign egg colours. Biol Lett, 45:15–517.
    Cherry MI, Bennett ATD, Moskát C. 2007a. Host intra-clutch variation, cuckoo egg matching and egg rejection by great reed warblers. Naturwissenschaften, 94:441–447.
    Cherry MI, Bennett ATD, Moskát C. 2007b. Do cuckoos choose nests of great reed warblers on the basis of host egg appearance? J Evol Biol, 20:1218–1222.
    Cherry MI, Bennett ATD. 2001. Egg colour matching in an African cuckoo as revealed by ultraviolet-visible reflectance spectrophotometry. Proc R Soc B, 268:565–571.
    Davies NB, Brooke M de L. 1988. Cuckoos versus reed warblers: adaptations and counteradaptations. Anim Behav, 36:262–284.
    Davies NB, Brooke M de L. 1989. An experimental study of coevolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. I. Host egg discrimination. J Anim Ecol, 58:207–224.
    Davies NB. 2000. Cuckoos, Cowbirds and Other Cheats. T & AD Poyser, London.
    Davies NB. 2011. Cuckoo adaptations: trickery and tuning. J Zool, 284:1–14.
    Dawkins NB, Krebs JR. 1979. Arms races between and within species. Proc R Soc B, 205:489–511.
    de la Colina MA, Pompilio L, Hauber ME, Reboreda JC, Mahler B. 2012. Different recognition cues reveal the decision rules used for egg rejection by hosts of a variably mimetic avian brood parasite. Anim Cogn, 15:881–889.
    Edvardsen E, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Øien IJ, Honza M. 2001. Egg mimicry in cuckoos parasitizing four sympatric species of Acrocephalus warblers. Condor, 103:829–837.
    Endler JA, 1993. The color of light in forests and its implications. Ecol Monogr, 63:1–27.
    Endler JA, Milke PW Jr. 2005. Comparing entire colour patterns as birds see them. Biol J Linn Soc, 86:405–431.
    Fuisz TI, de Kort SR. 2007. Habitat-dependent call divergence in the common cuckoo: is it a potential signal for assortative mating? Proc R Soc B, 274:2093–2097.
    Gomez D. 2010. AVICOL, Version 4. A program to analyse spectrometric data. Available from the author upon request (dodogomez@yahoo. fr) or by download. http://sites.google.com/site/avicolprogram/.
    Hargitai R, Moskát C, Bán M, Gil D, López-Rull I, Solymos E. 2010. Eggshell characteristics and yolk composition in the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus: are they adapted to brood parasitism? J Avian Biol, 41:177–185.
    Hart NS, Partridge JC, Cuthill IC, Bennett ATD. 2000. Visual pigments, oil droplets, ocular media and cone photoreceptor distribution in two species of passerine bird: the blue tit (Parus caeruleus L. ) and the blackbird (Turdus merula L. ). J Comp Physiol A, 186:375–387.
    Hauber ME, Sherman PW. 2001. Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical results. Trends Neurosci, 24:609–616.
    Higuchi H. 1998. Host use and egg color of Japanese cuckoos. In: Rothstein SI, Robinson SK (eds) Parasitic Birds and Their Hosts. Studies in Coevolution. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 80–93.
    Honza M, Moksnes A, Roskaft E, Stokke B. 2001. How are different common cuckoo Cuculus canorus egg morphs maintained? An evaluation of different hypotheses. Ardea, 89:341–352.
    Honza M, Procházka P, Morongová K, Capek MC, Jelinek V. 2011. Do nest light conditions affect rejection of parasitic eggs? A test of the light environment hypothesis. Ethology, 117:539–546.
    Igic B, Cassey P, Grim T, Greenwood DR, Moskát C, Rutila J, Hauber ME. 2012. A shared chemical basis of avian hostparasite egg colour mimicry. Proc R Soc B, 279:1068–1076.
    Johnsgard PA. 1997. The Avian Brood Parasites: Deception at the Nest. Oxford University Press, New York.
    Kelber A, Vorobyev M, Osorio D. 2003. Animal colour vision ― behavioural tests and physiological concepts. Biol Rev, 78:81–118.
    Kilner RM. 2006. The evolution of egg colour and patterning in birds. Biol Rev, 81:383–406.
    Krüger O. 2007. Cuckoos, cowbirds and hosts: adaptations, trade-offs and constraints. Phil Trans R Soc B, 362:1879–1886.
    Langmore NE, Stevens M, Maurer G, Kilner RM. 2009. Are dark cuckoo eggs cryptic in host nests? Anim Behav, 78:461–468.
    Leisler B, Schulze-Hagen K. 2011. The Reed Warblers: Diversity in a Uniform Bird Family. KNNV Uitgeverij.
    Lotem A, Nakamura H, Zahavi A. 1992. Rejection of cuckoo eggs in relation to host age: a possible evolutionary equilibrium. Behav Ecol, 3:128–132.
    Lotem A, Nakamura H, Zahavi A. 1995. Constrains on egg discrimination and cuckoo-host co-evolution. Anim Behav, 49:1185–1209.
    Lovászi P, Moskát C. 2004. Break-down of arms race between the red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio) and common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). Behaviour, 141:245–262.
    Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Bicik V, Honza M, Øien IJ. 1993. Cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism on Acrocephalus warblers in Southern Moravia in the Czech Republic. J Ornithol, 134:425–434.
    Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Braa AT, Korsnes L, Lampe HM, Pedersen HC. 1991. Behavioural responses of potential hosts towards artificial cuckoo eggs and dummies. Behaviour, 116:64–89.
    Moksnes A, Røskaft E. 1995. Egg-morphs and host preference in the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus): an analysis of cuckoo and host eggs from European museum collections. J Zool Lond, 236:625–648.
    Møller AP, Antonov A, Stokke BG, Fossøy F, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Takasu F. 2011. Isolation by time and habitat and coexistence of distinct host races of the common cuckoo. J Evol Biol, 24:676–684.
    Molnár B. 1944. The cuckoo in the Hungarian plain. Aquila, 51:100–112.
    Moskát C, Avilés JM, Bán M, Hargitai R, Zölei A. 2008a. Experimental support for the use of egg uniformity in parasite egg discrimination by cuckoo hosts. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 62:1885–1890.
    Moskát C, Hansson B, Barabás L, Bártol I, Karcza Z. 2008b. Common cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism, antiparasite defence and gene flow in closely located populations of great reed warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus. J Avian Biol, 39:663–671.
    Moskát C, Honza M. 2000. Effect of nest and nest site characteristics on the risk of cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism in the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus. Ecography, 23:335–341.
    Moskát C, Honza M. 2002. European Cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism and host's rejection behaviour in a heavily parasitized great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus population. Ibis, 144:614–622.
    Moskát C, Székely T, Cuthill IC, Kisbenedek T. 2008c. Hosts' responses to parasitic eggs: which cues elicit hosts' egg discrimination? Ethology, 114:186–194.
    Muñoz AR, Altamirano M, Takasu F, Nakamura H. 2007. Nest light environment and the potential risk of common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) parasitism. Auk, 124:619–627.
    Nakamura H, Kubota S, Suzuki R. 1998. Coevolution between the common cuckoo and its major hosts in Japan. In: Rothstein SI, Robinson SK (eds) Parasitic Birds and Their Hosts. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 94–112.
    Nakamura H. 1990. Brood parasitism by the cuckoo Cuculus canorus in Japan and the start of new parasitism on the azurewinged magpie Cyanopica cyana. Japn J Ornithol, 39:1–18.
    Osorio D, Vorobyev M. 1996. Colour vision as an adaptation to frugivory in primates. Proc R Soc B, 263:593–599.
    Payne R. 2005. Cuckoos, Cuculidae. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    Polacikova L, Grim T. 2010. Blunt egg pole holds cues for alien egg discrimination: experimental evidence. J Avian Biol, 41:111–116.
    Røskaft E, Moksnes A, Stokke BG, Bicik V, Moskát C. 2002. Agression to dummy cuckoos by potential European cuckoo hosts. Behaviour, 139:613–628.
    Røskaft E, Takasu F, Moksnes A, Stokke BG. 2006. Importance of spatial habitat structure on establishment of host defenses against brood parasitism. Behav Ecol, 17:700–708.
    Rothstein SI. 1990. A model system of coevolution: avian brood parasitism. Ann Rev Ecol Syst, 21:481–508.
    Southern HN. 1954. Mimicry in cuckoos' eggs. In: Huxley J, Hardy AC, Ford EB (eds) Evolution as a Process. Allen & Unwin, London, pp 219–232.
    Spottiswoode CN, Stevens M. 2010. Visual modelling shows that avian host parents use multiple visual cues in rejecting parasitic eggs. PNAS, 107:8672–8676.
    Stoddard MC, Stevens M. 2010. Pattern mimicry of host eggs by the common cuckoo, as seen through a bird's eye. Proc R Soc B, 277:1387–1393.
    Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. 2002. Obligate brood parasites as selective agents for evolution of egg appearance in passerine birds. Evolution, 56:199–205.
    Stokke BG, MoksnesA, Røskaft E. 2005. The enigma of imperfect adaptations in hosts of avian brood parasities. Ornithol Sci, 4:17–29.
    Takasu F, Moskát C, Muñoz AR, Imanishi S, Nakamura H. 2009. Adaptations in the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) to host eggs in a multiple-hosts system of brood parasitism. Biol J Linn Soc, 98:291–300.
    Takasu F, Moskát C. 2011. Modeling the consequence of increased host tolerance toward avian brood parasitism. Popul Ecol, 53:187–193.
    Takasu F. 1998. Modelling the arms race in avian brood parasitism. Evol Ecol, 12:969–987.
    Takasu F. 2003. Co-evolutionary dynamic of egg apperance in avian brood parasitism. Evol Ecol Res, 5:345–362.
    Trnka A, Prokop P. 2011. Polygynous great reed warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus suffer more cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism than monogamous pairs. J Avian Biol, 42:192–195.
    Underwood TJ, Sealy SG. 2002. Adaptive significance of egg coloration. In: Deeming DC (ed) Avian Incubation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 280–298.
    Vikan JR, Fossøy F, Huhta E, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Stokke BG. 2011. Outcomes of brood parasite–host interactions mediated by egg matching: common cuckoos Cuculus canorus versus Fringilla finches. PLoS ONE, 6: e19288.
    Vorobyev M, Osorio D. 1998. Receptor noise as a determinant of colour thresholds. Proc R Soc B, 265:351–358.
    Yang C, Liang W, Cai Y, Shi S, Takasu F, Møller AP, Antonov A, Fossøy F, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Stokke BG. 2010. Coevolution in action: disruptive selection on egg colour in an avian brood parasite and its host. PLoS ONE, 5: e10816.
  • Related Articles

Catalog

    Figures(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (3138) PDF downloads (1561) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return