Melisa Vázquez-López, Nandadevi Córtes-Rodríguez, Sahid M. Robles-Bello, Alfredo Bueno-Hernández, Luz E. Zamudio-Beltrán, Kristen Ruegg, Blanca E. Hernández-Baños. 2021: Phylogeography and morphometric variation in the Cinnamon Hummingbird complex: Amazilia rutila (Aves: Trochilidae). Avian Research, 12(1): 61. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-021-00295-0
Citation: Melisa Vázquez-López, Nandadevi Córtes-Rodríguez, Sahid M. Robles-Bello, Alfredo Bueno-Hernández, Luz E. Zamudio-Beltrán, Kristen Ruegg, Blanca E. Hernández-Baños. 2021: Phylogeography and morphometric variation in the Cinnamon Hummingbird complex: Amazilia rutila (Aves: Trochilidae). Avian Research, 12(1): 61. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-021-00295-0

Phylogeography and morphometric variation in the Cinnamon Hummingbird complex: Amazilia rutila (Aves: Trochilidae)

Funds: 

PAPIIT/DGAPA, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) through a grant to Blanca E. Hernández-Baños IN220620

LEZ-B acknowledges the Postdoctoral scholarship provided by DGAPA-UNAM 

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Blanca E. Hernández-Baños, behb@ciencias.unam.mx

  • Received Date: 18 Feb 2021
  • Accepted Date: 30 Oct 2021
  • Available Online: 24 Apr 2022
  • Publish Date: 10 Nov 2021
  • Background 

    The Mesoamerican dominion is a biogeographic area of great interest due to its complex topography and distinctive climatic history. This area has a large diversity of habitats, including tropical deciduous forests, which house a large number of endemic species. Here, we assess phylogeographic pattern, genetic and morphometric variation in the Cinnamon Hummingbird complex Amazilia rutila, which prefers habitats in this region. This resident species is distributed along the Pacific coast from Sinaloa—including the Tres Marías Islands in Mexico to Costa Rica, and from the coastal plain of the Yucatán Peninsula of Mexico south to Belize.

    Methods 

    We obtained genetic data from 85 samples of A. rutila, using 4 different molecular markers (mtDNA: ND2, COI; nDNA: ODC, MUSK) on which we performed analyses of population structure (median-joining network, STRUCTURE, FST, AMOVA), Bayesian and Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic analyses, and divergence time estimates. In order to evaluate the historic suitability of environmental conditions, we constructed projection models using past scenarios (Pleistocene periods), and conducted Bayesian Skyline Plots (BSP) to visualize changes in population sizes over time. To analyze morphometric variation, we took measurements of 5 morphological traits from 210 study skins. We tested for differences between sexes, differences among geographic groups (defined based on genetic results), and used PCA to examine the variation in multivariate space.

    Results 

    Using mtDNA, we recovered four main geographic groups: the Pacific coast, the Tres Marías Islands, the Chiapas region, and the Yucatán Peninsula together with Central America. These same groups were recovered by the phylogenetic results based on the multilocus dataset. Demography based on BSP results showed constant population size over time throughout the A. rutila complex and within each geographic group. Ecological niche model projections onto past scenarios revealed no drastic changes in suitable conditions, but revealed some possible refuges. Morphometric results showed minor sexual dimorphism in this species and statistically significant differences between geographic groups. The Tres Marías Islands population was the most differentiated, having larger body size than the remaining groups.

    Conclusions 

    The best supported evolutionary hypothesis of diversification within this group corresponds to geographic isolation (limited gene flow), differences in current environmental conditions, and historical habitat fragmentation promoted by past events (Pleistocene refugia). Four well-defined clades comprise the A. rutila complex, and we assess the importance of a taxonomic reevaluation. Our data suggest that both of A. r. graysoni (Tres Marías Islands) and A. r. rutila (Pacific coast) should be considered full species. The other two strongly supported clades are: (a) the Chiapas group (southern Mexico), and (b) the populations from Yucatán Peninsula and Central America. These clades belong to the corallirostris taxon, which needs to be split and properly named.

  • The Crested Ibis (Nipponia nippon, Plates Ⅰ and ) (Ciconiiformes: Threskiornithidae) is a medium-sized wading bird, ranging in length from 57.5 to 84.0 cm, with a longish neck and legs, a red featherless face with a crested white head. Its most distinctive morphological character is the long, slender and decurved bill, perfectly adapted for probing in water and mud, or even in cracks on dry ground. The non-breeding adult is white, with orange cinnamon tones in the tail and flight-feathers. The long bill is black with a red tip. Its red legs do not extend beyond the tail in flight (Hoyo et al., 1992).

      Plate Ⅰ.  Crested Ibis (Nipponia nippon). (a) Crested Ibis in flight; (b) Young Crested Ibis (photos by Zhinong Xi).
      Plate Ⅱ.  Crested Ibis (Nipponia nippon). (a) Non-breeding Crested Ibis (photo by Changqing Ding); (b) Feeding the chicks (photo by Jingquan Jiao); (c) Adult and fledglings (photo by Changqing Ding).

    The Crested Ibis is categorized as Endangered (EN) in the IUCN Red List (BirdLife International, 2001) and is listed in Appendix Ⅰ of CITES. It is also ranked as a first class national key protected animal in China (Zheng and Wang, 1998; Ding, 2004).

    The Crested Ibis was widespread and locally common in North-East Asia until the late nineteenth century, when it was breeding in far eastern Russia, Japan and mainland China and was a presumed non-breeding visitor to the Korea Peninsula and Taiwan Island (Fig. 1). The population of the Crested Ibis rapidly declined in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, related to deforestation of pine woodlands as nesting habitat, human persuit, especially over-hunting, drying out of wetland and the abuse of chemical fertilizers and pesticides in paddy fields during the 1950's. This species was even evaluated as extinct in the wild (EW) when the last five wild birds in Japan were caught into captivity in 1981.

    Figure  1.  Distribution of Crested Ibis (Imitated from BirdLife International, 2001)

    In China, the last specimen was collected in Gansu Province in 1964, after which there were no records for a long time (Ding, 2004). In May 1981, after three years of a nation-wide survey, a tiny wild population of seven birds (two pairs and three fledglings) was re-discovered in Yangxian, Shaanxi Province in central China and renewed hope for this species (Liu, 1981).

    After the rediscovery of the wild population, the Chinese government and authorities have made great efforts for the conservation of the Crested Ibis and its habitats. The Shaanxi Crested Ibis Nature Reserve was established in 1990 and this magnificent bird has since been the focus of intensive conservation efforts. The seven original birds are the source of all present Crested Ibis populations, both in the wild and in captivity. Now there is only one wild population remaining in the world, located in Yangxian and nearby counties in Shaanxi Province and has been gradually recovering to more than 600 birds in 2007 (Fig. 2) (Zhang and Ding, 2008). One reintroduced population of about 20 birds has been established in Ningshan County, Shaanxi Province since 2007.

    Figure  2.  Population size of the wild Crested Ibis from 1981 to 2007

    Six fledglings were taken from the wild to initiate a captive population in Beijing Zoo before 1986, where the first successful breeding was achieved in 1989 (Li, 1991). Another captive rearing and breeding program began at the Shaanxi Crested Ibis Breeding Centre in 1990 with the rescue of sick or injured chicks and the collection of some of the eggs deserted by parental birds in the wild (Xi et al., 2002). There are now five captive populations with a total of about 600 birds in the Beijing Zoo, Yangxian and Zhouzhi counties of Shaanxi Province, the Dongzhai Nature Reserve of Henan Province and in Deqing County of Zhejiang Province.

    The annual activity of the Crested Ibis can be divided into a breeding season (February to June), a wandering season (July to October) and a wintering season (November to January) (Wang and Shi, 2000). The breeding areas are located in middle and lower mountains with wintering paddy fields, nesting on tall trees, close to villages. The position of the nest sites is closely related to the availability of feeding grounds and many nests are built close to human settlements, often less than 100 m and sometimes the nest tree is only a few meters from a human settlement. The trunks of nest trees (and adjacent trees) are covered with plastic cloth or razor blades to prevent snakes from climbing up and nets are placed under the nests to catch any chicks that fall out (Ding and Li, 2005).

    The mating system is monogamous. Male and female birds both contribute to nesting, hatching and feeding chicks. Pairs will use the same nesting territory if not disturbed. In the past they were observed to re-use old nests but most pairs now build new nests every year (Shi et al., 2001).

    The wild population no longer migrates, only making short flights to feed in paddy fields below 700 m during the winter and moving to higher elevations (up to 1200 m) to nest in the spring. During the wandering season, the birds move about 25 km (15−45 km) from their breeding areas to planes along the Hanjiang River. They move back to their breeding areas during the wintering season. During the non-breeding season, the ibises gather in flocks for feeding and roosting.

    Breeding starts in late February to early March, with laying from mid March to early April. Nests are flimsy stick platforms, lined with small twigs, leaves and hay, built on branches of trees (Pinus massoniana, Quercus variabilis, chestnut or poplar), at heights of 4−22 m. Usually there are 3−4 eggs per nest, the incubation period is about 28 days; chicks have gray down, white below and become fledglings after 40−45 days. The young birds are sexually mature in 2−3 years. Captive birds in Japan have lived to become 37 years old.

    The size of the home range averages 100.8 ± 49.8 ha (according to MCP method) and 175.6 ± 91.3 ha (according to 90% Kernel method); the breeding home range of different pairs overlaps about 24.5 ± 27.3% and some pairs can overlap up to 46.8−64.3% (Liu et al., 2003).

    The success of fledglings from the wild population was only 11% in the early 1980s, but with effective conservation measures taken since then, it increased to 53% in the late 1990s (Shi and Cao, 2001). Because a high proportion of the wild population consists of young birds that have not yet started to breed (Lu et al., 2000), it is predicted that the wild population of the Crested Ibis will continue to increase and that they will expand their breeding range. The distribution area has been increased from less than 100 km2 to more than 3000 km2 at present. The discovery of a nesting pair in Xixiang County of Shannxi Province in 1999 provides evidence for such an expansion (Ding et al., 1999). Figure 3 shows the dispersal of breeding sites from 20 nests in 1999 to 102 nests in 2007 (Zhang and Ding, 2008).

    Figure  3.  Nest site distribution of Crested Ibis showing the dispersal of the wild population (a: 1999, b: 2007).

    Birds forage during the daytime in small flocks, probe into mud or shallow water with their bill, or pick up prey from the ground. The diet consists of freshwater fish (loaches and eels), amphibians (frogs, newts and salamanders), crustaceans, freshwater mollusks and insects, especially grasshoppers, crickets and adults and larvae of aquatic beetles.

    In winter, the main feeding habitats are paddy fields, riverbanks and reservoirs, mainly close to human settlements. Birds seem able to tolerate human activities in these areas (Ma et al., 2001). The areas where they currently breed are at 470–1300 m elevation (Ma et al., 2001), but elders in Yangxian reported that, prior to the 1940s, they were usually found at lower elevations in areas with slow-flowing rivers. In recent years, they have tended to move into new nesting sites at lower elevations in this area (Zhai et al., 2001), presumably indicating that this relict population had become confined to suboptimal upland areas but is now expanding back into more typical lowland habitats.

    The use of fertilizer and pesticides usually causes pollution in feeding areas and threatens food diversity and richness of the Crested Ibis, especially in the chick hatching period. Research has indicated that food shortage is a major factor affecting the chick survival rate (Ding, 2004). Food supplementation in paddy fields is an effective measure during the breeding season.

    Since there is only one wild population in the world, found in a very limited area, the Crested Ibis cannot avoid being threatened. If wildlife diseases (such as New Castle disease and bird flu), climate disasters (such as heavy snow and extreme drought during breeding season) and outbreaks of pollution in feeding areas, the wild population of the Crested Ibis will be faced with a serious threat to its survival. It is urgently required to conduct a reintroduction program to establish a second and third wild population in other areas (Ding and Li, 2005).

    At present, with the development of captive breeding populations, there are enough captive birds reserved for release into the wild. In 2004, the State Forestry Administration (SFA) organized a survey for reintroduction sites in China (Ding and Li, 2005). GIS techniques were used to detect potential suitable breeding sites for the Crested Ibis (Liu et al., 2006). Since then, four captive populations have been established for wild training in Huayang, Ningshan, Dongzhai and Deqing. Where could potential reintroduction places be found?

    In October 2004, a small captive population was transferred to Huayang, a higher elevation area in Yangxian, for wild training. Up to 2006, 23 birds were released. Now the released birds have joined the local wild population and eight of them bred successfully in seven nests in 2010.

    In May 2007, 26 birds were released in Ningshan County, Shaanxi Province. It was the first reintroduction attempt of the Crested Ibis. With 16 more birds released later, there are more than 20 birds surviving in Ningshan and five pairs of them bred with six fledglings surviving in 2009 (XY Chang, unpublished data).

  • Arango A, Villalobos F, Prieto-Torres DA, Guevara R. The phylogenetic diversity and structure of the seasonally dry forest in the Neotropics. J Biogeogr. 2021;48: 176–86.
    Arbeláez-Cortés E, Navarro-Sigüenza AG. Molecular evidence of the taxonomic status of western Mexican populations of Phaethornis longirostris (Aves: Trochilidae). Zootaxa. 2013;3716: 81–97.
    Arbeláez-Cortés E, Roldán-Piña D, Navarro-Sigüenza AG. Multilocus phylogeography and morphology give insights into the recent evolution of a Mexican endemic songbird: Vireo hypochryseus. J Avian Biol. 2014;45: 253–63.
    Bandelt HJ, Foster P, Röhl A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 1999;16: 37–48.
    Barber BR, Klicka J. Two pulses of diversification across the Isthmus of Tehuantepec in a montane Mexican bird fauna. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2010;277: 2675–81.
    Benítez-López A, Santini L, Gallego-Zamorano J, Milá B, Walkden P, Huijbregts MA, et al. The island rule explains consistent patterns of body size evolution in terrestrial vertebrates. Nat Ecol Evol. 2021;5: 768–86.
    Billerman SM, Keeney BK, Rodewald PG, Schulenberg TS. Birds of the world. Ithaca: Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology; 2020. .
    Bleiweiss R. Tempo and mode of hummingbird evolution. Biol J Linn Soc. 1998;65: 63–76.
    Bleiweiss R, Kirsch JA, Matheus JC. DNA hybridization evidence for the principal lineages of hummingbirds (Aves: Trochilidae). Mol Biol Evol. 1997;14: 325–43.
    Booth TH, Nix HA, Busby JR, Hutchinson MF. BIOCLIM: the first species distribution modelling package, its early applications and relevance to most current MAXENT studies. Divers Distrib. 2014;20: 1–9.
    Bouckaert R, Vaughan TG, Barido-Sottani J, Duchêne S, Fourment M, Gavryushkina A, et al. BEAST 2.5: an advanced software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput Biol. 2019;15: e1006650.
    Bourcier J, Mulsant E. Description de vingt espèces nouvelles d'oiseaux-mouches. Ann Sci Phys Nat Agric. 1846;9: 312–32.
    Boyer AG, Jetz W. Biogeography of body size in Pacific island birds. Ecography. 2010;33: 369–79.
    Braconnot P, Otto-Bliesner B, Harrison S, Joussaume S, Peterchmitt JY, Abe-Ouchi A, et al. Results of PMIP2 coupled simulations of the Mid-Holocene and Last Glacial Maximum-Part 1: experiments and large-scale features. Clim Past. 2007;3: 261–77.
    Cavender-Bares J, Gonzalez-Rodriguez A, Pahlich A, Koehler K, Deacon N. Phylogeography and climatic niche evolution in live oaks (Quercus series Virentes) from the tropics to the temperate zone. J Biogeogr. 2011;38: 962–81.
    Chaves AV, Clozato CL, Lacerda DR, Sari H, Santos FR. Molecular taxonomy of Brazilian tyrant-flycatchers (Passeriformes, Tyrannidae). Mol Ecol. 2008;8: 1169–77.
    Clegg SM, Owens PF. The "island rule" in birds: medium body size and its ecological explanation. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2002;269: 1359–65.
    Cobos ME, Osorio-Olvera L, Soberón J, Peterson AT. ellipsenm: ecological niche characterizations using ellipsoids. R package; 2020. .
    Cortés-Rodríguez N, Hernández-Baños BE, Navarro-Sigüenza AG, Omland KE. Geographic variation and genetic structure in the Streak-backed Oriole: low mitochondrial DNA differentiation reveals recent divergence. Condor. 2008;4: 729–39.
    de Silva HG, Pérez Villafaña MG, Cruz-Nieto J, Cruz-Nieto MÁ. Are some of the birds endemic to the Tres Marías Islands (Mexico) species? Bull Br Ornithol Club. 2020;140: 7–37.
    DeLattre PA. Oiseaux-mouches nouveaux au peu connus, découverts au Guatimala. L'echo Du Monde Savant. 1843;7: 1068–70.
    Drummond AJ, Rambaut A, Shapiro B, Pybus OG. Bayesian coalescent inference of past population dynamics from molecular sequences. Mol Biol Evol. 2005;22: 1185–92.
    Earl DA, vonHoldt BM. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Res. 2012;4: 359–61.
    Ellegren H. Molecular evolutionary genomics of birds. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2007;117: 120–30.
    Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005;14: 2611–20.
    Excoffier LG, Schneider S. Arlequin v. 3.1: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online. 2006;1: 47–50.
    Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial restriction region. Genetics. 1992;131: 479–91.
    Fu Y. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics. 1997;147: 915–25.
    García-Deras GM, Cortés-Rodríguez N, Honey M, Navarro-Sigüenza AG, García-Moreno J, Hernández-Baños BE. Phylogenetic relationships within the genus Cynanthus (Aves: Trochilidae), with emphasis on C. doubledayi. Zootaxa. 2008;1742: 61–8.
    García-Trejo EA, Navarro-Sigüenza AG. Patrones biogeográficos de la riqueza de especies y el endemismo de la avifauna en el oeste de México. Acta Zool Mex. 2004;20: 167–85.
    Gill F, Donsker D, Rasmussen P. IOC World Bird List (v. 11.1). 2021. .
    González C, Ornelas JF, Gutiérrez-Rodríguez C. Selection and geographic isolation influence hummingbird speciation: genetic, acoustic and morphological divergence in the wedge-tailed sabrewing (Campylopterus curvipennins). BMC Evol Biol. 2011;11: 38.
    Gordon CE, Ornelas JF. Comparing endemism and habitat restriction in Mesoamerican tropical deciduous forest birds: implications for biodiversity conservation planning. Bird Conserv Int. 2000;10: 289–303.
    Grant PR. The adaptive significance of some size trends in island birds. Evolution. 1965;19: 355–67.
    Hahn IJ, Hogeback S, Römer U, Vergara PM. Biodiversity and biogeography of birds in Pacific Mexico along an isolation gradient from mainland Chamela via coastal Marías to oceanic Revillagigedo Islands. Vertebr Zool. 2012;62: 123–44.
    Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1999;41: 95–8.
    Hernández-Baños BE, Zamudio-Beltrán LE, Milá B. Phylogenetic relationships and systematics of a subclade of Mesoamerican emerald hummingbirds (Aves: Trochilidae: Trochilini). Zootaxa. 2020;4748: 581–91.
    Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol. 2005;25: 1965–78.
    Hijmans RJ. raster: geographic data analysis and modeling. R package. version 3.0-12. 2020. .
    Howell SN, Webb S. A guide to the birds of Mexico and northern Central America. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995.
    Hubisz M, Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard J. Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol Ecol Resour. 2009;9: 1322–32.
    Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. MrBayes: a program for the Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics. 2002;17: 754–5.
    Janes JK, Miller JM, Dupuis JR, Malenfant RM, Gorrell JC, Cullingham CI, et al. The K = 2 conundrum. Mol Ecol. 2017;26: 3594–602.
    Jiménez A, Ornelas JF. Historical and current introgression in a Mesoamerican hummingbird species complex: a biogeographic perspective. PeerJ. 2016;4: e1556.
    Koleff P, Urquiza-Haas T, Contreras B. Prioridades de conservación de los bosques tropicales en México: reflexiones sobre su estado de conservación y manejo. Ecosistemas. 2012;21: 6–20.
    Lanfear R, Calcott B, Ho SY, Guindon S. PartitionFinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29: 1695–701.
    Lanfear R, Frandsen PB, Wright AM, Senfeld T, Calcott B. PartitionFinder 2: new methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34: 772–3.
    Lawrence GN. Annals of the Lycaeum of natural history of New York. New York: Lyceum of Natural History; 1866.
    Lerdau M, Whitbeck J, Holbrook NM. Tropical deciduous forest: death of a biome. Trends Ecol Evol. 1991;6: 201–2.
    Lerner HRL, Meyer M, James HF, Hofreiter M, Fleischer RC. Multilocus resolution of phylogeny and timescale in the extant adaptive radiation of Hawaiian honeycreepers. Curr Biol. 2011;21: 1838–44.
    Librado P, Rozas J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics. 2009;25: 1451–2.
    Lomolino MV. Body size of mammals on islands: the island rule reexamined. Am Nat. 1985;125: 310–6.
    McCormack JE, Peterson AT, Bonaccorso E, Smith TB. Speciation in the highlands of Mexico: genetic and phenotypic divergence in the Mexican jay (Aphelocoma ultramarina). Mol Ecol. 2008;17: 2505–21.
    McGuire JA, Witt CC, Altshuler DL, Remsen JV Jr. Phylogenetic systematics and biogeography of hummingbirds: Bayesian and maximum likelihood analyses of partitioned data and selection of an appropriate partitioning strategy. Syst Biol. 2007;56: 837–56.
    McGuire JA, Witt CC, Remsen JV Jr, Corl A, Rabosky DL, Altshuler DL, et al. Molecular phylogenetics and the diversification of hummingbirds. Curr Biol. 2014;24: 910–6.
    Meave JA, Romero-Romero MA, Salas-Morales SH, Pérez-García EA, Gallardo-Cruz JA. Diversidad, amenazas y oportunidades para la conservación del bosque tropical caducifolio en el estado de Oaxaca, México. Ecosistemas. 2012;21: 85–100.
    Miller MJ, Lelevier MJ, Bermingham E, Klicka JT, Escalante P, Winker K. Phylogeography of the Rufous-tailed Hummingbird (Amazilia tzacatl). Condor. 2011;113: 806–16.
    Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Gateway computing environments workshop. New Orleans: IEEE; 2010.
    Montaño-Rendón M, Sánchez-González LA, Hernández-Alonso G, Navarro-Sigüenza AG. Genetic differentiation in the Mexican endemic Rufous-backed Robin, Turdus rufopalliatus (Passeriformes: Turdidae). Zootaxa. 2015;4034: 495–514.
    Moore WS. Inferring phylogenies from mtDNA variation: mitochondrial-gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees. Evolution. 1995;49: 718–26.
    Morrone JJ. Biogeographical regionalisation of the Neotropical region. Zootaxa. 2014;3782: 1–110.
    Navarro-Sigüenza AG, Peterson AT. An alternative species taxonomy of the birds of Mexico. Biota Neotrop. 2004;4: 1–32.
    Nelson EW. Descriptions of new birds from the Tres Marias Islands, Western Mexico. Proc Biol Soc Washington. 1898;12: 63-4.
    Ornelas JF, González C, de los Monteros AE, Rodríguez-Gómez F, García-Feria LM. In and out of Mesoamerica: temporal divergence of Amazilia hummingbirds pre-dates the orthodox account of the completion of the Isthmus of Panama. J Biogeogr. 2014;41: 168–81.
    Ortiz-Ramírez MF, Sánchez-González LA, Castellanos-Morales G, Ornelas JF, Navarro-Sigüenza AG. Concerted Pleistocene dispersal and genetic differentiation in passerine birds from the Tres Marías Archipelago, Mexico. Auk. 2018;135: 716–32.
    Osorio-Olvera L, Barve V, Barve N, Soberón J. nichetoolbox: from getting biodiversity data to evaluating species distribution models in a friendly GUI environment. R package. version 0.2.0.0. 2016. .
    Pacheco MA, Battistuzzi FU, Lentino M, Aguilar RF, Kumar S, Escalante AA. Evolution of modern birds revealed by mitogenomics: timing the radiation and origin of major orders. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28: 1927–42.
    Ridgway R. Part V: Family Trochilidae in: The birds of North and Middle America: a descriptive catalogue. Washington: Bulletin of the United States National Museum No. 50; 1901.
    Paynter RA. The ornithogeography of the Yucatán Peninsula. New Haven: Yale University; 1955.
    Peterson AT, Navarro AG. Western Mexico: a significant center of avian endemism and challenge for conservation action. Cotinga. 2000;14: 42–6.
    Peterson AT, Navarro-Sigüenza AG, Li X. Joint effects of marine intrusion and climate change on the Mexican avifauna. Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 2010;100: 908–16.
    Phillips SJ, Dudík M, Schapire RE. Maxent software for modeling species niches and distributions. version 3.4.1. 2021.
    Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155: 945–59.
    R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020. .
    Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA. Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Syst Biol. 2018;67: 901–4.
    Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. TreeAnnotator v. 2.6.2: MCMC Output analysis. 2013; .
    Rambaut A. FigTree v1.4.2: Tree figure drawing tool. 2014; .
    Ramírez-Barrera SM, Hernández-Baños BE, Jaramillo-Correa JP, Klicka J. Deep divergence of Red-crowned Ant Tanager (Habia rubica: Cardinalidae), a multilocus phylogenetic analysis with emphasis in Mesoamerica. PeerJ. 2018;6: e5496.
    Rodríguez-Gómez F, Ornelas JF. Genetic structuring and secondary contact in the white-chested Amazilia hummingbird species complex. J Avian Biol. 2018;49: e01536.
    Ryan RM. The biotic provinces of Central America. Acta Zool Mex. 1963;6: 1–54.
    Rzedowski J. Vegetación de México. México: Limusa; 1978.
    Savage JM. The origins and history of the Central America herpetofauna. Copeia. 1966;4: 719–66.
    Seeholzer GF, Brumfield RT. Isolation by distance, not incipient ecological speciation, explains genetic differentiation in an Andean songbird (Aves: Furnariidae: Cranioleuca antisiensis, Line-cheeked Spinetail) despite near threefold body size change across an environmental gradient. Mol Ecol. 2018;27: 279–96.
    Smith H. Las provincias bióticas de México, según la distribución geográfica de las lagartijas del género Sceloporus. Anales De La Escuela Nacional De Ciencias Biológicas. 1941;2: 103–10.
    Smith BT, Escalante P, Hernández-Baños BE, Navarro-Sigüenza AG, Rohwer S, Klicka J. The role of historical and contemporary processes on phylogeographic structure and genetic diversity in the Northern Cardinal, Cardinalis Cardinalis. BMC Evol Biol. 2011;11: 136.
    Sorenson MD, Ast JC, Dimcheff DE, Yuri T, Mindell DP. Primers for a PCR-based approach to mitochondrial genome sequencing in birds and other vertebrates. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1999;12: 105–14.
    Stamakis A. RaxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30: 1312–3.
    Stecher G, Tamura K, Kumar S. Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) for macOS. Mol Biol Evol. 2020;37: 1237–9.
    Stephens M, Scheet P. Accounting for decay of linkage disequilibrium in haplotype inference and missing-data imputation. Am J Human Genet. 2005;76: 449–62.
    Stephens M, Smith N, Donelly P. A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am J Human Genet. 2001;68: 978–89.
    Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989;123: 585–95.
    Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22: 4673–80.
    van Rossem AJ. A northwest race of the Cinnamon Hummingbird. Condor. 1938;40: 226–7.
    van Valen LM. Pattern and the balance of nature. Evol Theor. 1973;1: 31–49.
    Vázquez-López AM, Morrone JJ, Ramírez-Barrera SM, López-López A, Robles-Bello SM, Hernández-Baños BE. Multilocus, phenotypic, behavioral, and ecological niche analyses provide evidence for two species within Euphonia affinis (Aves, Fringilidae). ZooKeys. 2020;952: 129–57.
    Vázquez-Miranda H, Navarro-Sigüenza AG, Omland KE. Phylogeography of the Rufous-naped Wren (Campylorhynchus rufinucha): speciation and hybridization in Mesoamerica. Auk. 2009;126: 765–78.
    Weir JT. Divergent timing and patterns of species accumulation in lowland and highland neotropical birds. Evolution. 2006;60: 842–55.
    Weller AA. Cinnamon Hummingbird. In: del Hoyo JJ, Elliott A, Sargatal J, editors. Handbook of the birds of the world. Barn-owls to hummingbirds. Barcelona: Lynx Editions; 1999. p. 596‒597.
    Werneck FP, Costa GC, Colli GR, Prado DE, Sites JW. Revisiting the historical distribution of Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests: new insights based on palaeodistribution modelling and palynological evidence. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2011;20: 272–88.
    West RC. The natural regions of Middle America. In: West RC, editor. Handbook of Middle American Indians. Austin: University of Texas Press; 1964. p. 363–83.
    Wickham H, Francois R, Henry L, Müller K. dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. R package. version 0.8.5. 2020. .
    Wilcox TP, Zwickl DJ, Heath TA, Hillis DM. Phylogenetic relationships of the dwarf boas and a comparison of Bayesian and bootstrap measures of phylogenetic support. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2002;25: 361–71.
    Zamudio-Beltrán LE, Hernández-Baños BE. Genetic and morphometric divergence in the Garnet-Throated Hummingbird Lamprolaima rhami (Aves: Trochilidae). PeerJ. 2018;6: e5733.
    Zamudio-Beltrán LE, Ornelas JF, Malpica A, Hernández-Baños BE. Genetic and morphological differentiation among populations of the Rivoli's Hummingbird (Eugenes fulgens) species complex (Aves: Trochilidae). Auk. 2020;137: ukaa032.
    Zizka A, Silvestro D, Andermann T, Azevedo J, Duarte-Ritter C, Edler D, et al. CoordinateCleaner: standardized cleaning of occurrence records from biological collection databases. Method Ecol Evol. 2019;10: 744–51.
  • Related Articles

Catalog

    Figures(5)  /  Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (417) PDF downloads (5) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return