Nadejda Djorgova, Dimitar Ragyov, Valko Biserkov, Jordan Biserkov, Boris P. Nikolov. 2021: Habitat preferences of diurnal raptors in relation to human access to their breeding territories in the Balkan Mountain Range, Bulgaria. Avian Research, 12(1): 29. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-021-00265-6
Citation: Nadejda Djorgova, Dimitar Ragyov, Valko Biserkov, Jordan Biserkov, Boris P. Nikolov. 2021: Habitat preferences of diurnal raptors in relation to human access to their breeding territories in the Balkan Mountain Range, Bulgaria. Avian Research, 12(1): 29. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-021-00265-6

Habitat preferences of diurnal raptors in relation to human access to their breeding territories in the Balkan Mountain Range, Bulgaria

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Nadejda Djorgova, E-mail: djorgova@gmail.com

  • Received Date: 29 Sep 2020
  • Accepted Date: 29 May 2020
  • Available Online: 24 Apr 2022
  • Publish Date: 08 Jun 2021
  • Background 

    In this study we examined the habitat preferences of three diurnal raptors in relation to human access. We aimed to identify the selection of breeding habitat by the Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), the Long-legged Buzzard (Buteo rufinus), and the Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus) in response to site accessibility by humans, and in turn, the response of these species to human presence.

    Methods 

    Data about the nest locations were collected. Analyses and maps were created using ArcGIS. The "least cost path" was defined using the Cost Path tool.

    Results 

    The lowest values of the Cost Path were established for Long-legged Buzzard and the highest values were estimated for Golden Eagle. Intermediate Cost Path values for Peregrine Falcon were found.

    Conclusions 

    The Long-legged Buzzard could be considered as the most tolerant to human presence in its breeding territories. The Golden Eagle have the lowest degree of tolerance and the Peregrine Falcon is ranked in an intermediate position compared to the other two species, but closer to Golden Eagle.

  • Pollution of the natural environment by heavy metals is a worldwide problem. Heavy metals enter the aquatic ecosystem through a variety of anthropogenic sources as well as from natural processes (Ebrahimpour and Mushrifah, 2010). They are a serious threat because of their toxicity, bioaccumulation, long persistence and bio-magnification in the food chain (Erdoĝrul and Ates, 2006). The degree of toxic metal uptake, translocation and eventual detoxification within an organism depends on metal speciation, but also differs strongly among organisms (Mukherjee and Nuorteva, 1994; Doyle and Otte, 1997). Assessing ecosystem health adequately by means of biomonitoring requires the selection of representative indicator species. Birds are widely used to biomonitoring variation in environmental levels of anthropogenic pollutants (Furness and Camphuysen, 1997; Barbieri et al., 2009), because they are exposed to a wide range of chemicals and occupy high trophic levels and can therefore provide information on the extent of contamination in the entire food chain (Furness and Camphuysen, 1997; Burger et al., 2007).

    According to Burger and Gochfeld(2000a, 2000b) feathers are useful for measuring heavy metal contamination in birds because birds sequester heavy metals in their feathers, where the proportion of the body burden is relatively constant for each metal. In general, metals in breast feathers are representative of circulating concentrations in the blood stream only during the limited time period of feather formation, which in turn represents both local exposure and mobilization from internal tissues (Lewis and Furness, 1991; Monteiro, 1996). Many studies have recommended herons and egrets as bioindicators for heavy metals in aquatic systems and local pollution around breeding sites (Boncompagni et al., 2003; Kim and Koo, 2007). Herons and gulls are high at the top of their food pyramid and can yield information over a large area around each sampling site, not only on bioavailability of contaminants but also on how, where, and when they are transferred within the food web (Battaglia et al., 2005). Hence, the aim of the present study was to investigate the level of nickel in feathers of two bird species, the Western Reef Heron (Egretta gularis) and the Siberian Gull (Larus heuglini), in order 1) to compare metal concentrations between two species with their life strategy and 2) to examine the species and gender related variation in trace nickel accumulations in the Hara Biosphere Reserve of southern Iran.

    The Hara Biosphere Reserve (26°40′–27°N, 55°21′–55°52′E) is located in southern Iran, in the Straits of Khuran between Queshm Island and the Persian Gulf (Fig. 1). This area became part of the Man and Biosphere Program (MAB) of UNESCO in 1977 (UNESCO, 2010). As well, this region is one of the protected areas in Iran introduced by the Department of the Environment. The entire region was selected as wetland of international importance under the Wetlands of International Importance category as a Habitat of Aquatic Birds. This region was also introduced as one of the important bird areas by the International Organization of Birdlife (Neinavaz et al., 2010).

    Figure  1.  Location of the Hara Biosphere Reserve in southern Iran

    During November and December 2010, under license of the Environmental Protection Agency of Hormozgan, a total of thirty birds were shot and removed from throughout the Hara biosphere reserve. The collection included the Western Reef Heron (Egretta gularis) (n = 15) and the Siberian Gull (Larus heuglini) (n = 15). The birds were transported to the laboratory packed in ice. The specimen were killed, weighed, stored in plastic bags and kept at −20℃ until dissection and analysis. We chose breast feathers because they are representatives of the plumage and are less affected by molt compared to flight feathers. All feathers were analyzed in the Laboratory of the Inland Water Aquaculture Research Institute in port Anzali. The feather samples were digested in a nitric acid (HNO3) and perchloric acid (HClO4) mixture. Feathers were then accurately weighed in 150-mL Erlenmeyer flasks, where 10 mL nitric acid (65%) was added to each sample. The samples were left overnight to be slowly digested; thereafter, 5 mL perchloric acid (70%) was added to each sample. Digestion was performed on a hot plate (sand bath) at 200℃. After that, the digested samples were diluted by 25 mL deionized water. The concentration of nickel was estimated using a Shimadzu AA 680 flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer. The accuracy of the analysis was checked by measuring CRM certified reference tissue (DORM-2, NRC Canada). The detection limit for nickel was 0.039 µg·g−1. The results for nickel gave a mean recovery of 98.6%.

    A statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS (version 18.0). We used a three-way ANOVA for nickel (sex, age, species, interaction (sex × age × species)). Data were log transformed to obtain normal distributions that satisfied the homogeneity of variance required by ANOVA (Custer et al., 2003; Kim et al., 2009). The nickel concentration in feathers was tested for mean differences between species using Student t tests. The level of significance was set at α = 0.05. The concentration of nickel in feathers was expressed in microgram per gram of dry weight (dw). Values are given in means ± standard errors (SE).

    Variations in the nickel concentration of feathers of the Western Reef Heron and Siberian Gull are presented in Table 1. The results show that there was a significant difference between the mean nickel concentrations in the two bird species, i.e. the Western Reef Heron and Siberian Gull, while there was no evidence of significant different accumulation between genders and ages (Table 2). Also, the results indicate that the level of nickel concentration in the Western Reef Heron was higher in females than in males; in contrast, the level of nickel concentration in the Siberian gull was higher in males.

    Table  1.  Geometric means (95% CI) nickel concentrations in feathers of Western Reef Heron and Siberian Gull from the Hara Biosphere Reserve of southern Iran
    Species Male/adult Male/juvenile Female/adult Female/juvenile
    Western Reef Heron
    Geometric mean 2.77 3.79 4.67
    Mean ± SE 3.47±2.7 4.67±2.7 4.67
    Number 9/9 5/5 1
    Siberian Gull
    Geometric mean 8.89 3.87 6.72 7.24
    Mean ± SE 8.94±1.1 4.38±2.5 7.6±3.4 8.1±4.8
    Number 3/3 3/3 6/6 3/3
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table  2.  Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of nickel concentrations among species, gender and age
    Source of variation Mean square F p
    Species 78.23 8.56 0.01 a
    Gender 9.56 1.04 NS b
    Age 7.57 0.82 NS
    Intercept (species × gender × age) 572.55 62.66 0.001
    a p-value for 3-way ANOVA. Interaction term significant as indicated.
    b NS = not significant at p > 0.05.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Nickel is not an important trace element in organisms, but at high levels, they can cause adverse health effects. Sources of heavy metals vary considerably. It is emitted into the environment by both natural and man-made sources. Once released into the environment, nickel readily forms complexes with many ligands, making it more mobile than most heavy metals (Mansouri et al., 2011). Nickel is related to the pigmentation of feathers in birds and excreted via the feathers by moulting (Honda et al., 1986). Nickel concentrations in the current study (3.47–8.94 µg·g−1) were higher than those in Fulica atra (0.8 µg·g−1), Phalacrocorax carbo (0.5 µg·g−1) and Nycticorax nycticorax (1.2 µg·g−1) from Russia (Lebedeva, 1997), in Egretta alba (0.2 µg·g−1) from Korea (Honda et al., 1986) and Parus major (0.25 µg·g−1) from China (Deng et al., 2007). In our study, the nickel concentrations were similar to those in Bubulcus ibis L. (7.8–9.0 µg·g−1) from Pakistan (Malik and Zeb, 2009).

    Few studies have examined the effect of gender on the accumulation of heavy metals in feathers and other tissues (Burger, 1995; Zamani-Ahmadmahmoodi et al., 2010). Several studies reported no significant differences in the heavy metal content of feathers between male and female birds (Hutton, 1981; Zamani-Ahmadmahmoodi et al., 2009a). Similarly, in the present study there was no evidence of significant different accumulations between male and female birds (Table 2), suggesting that both sexes utilize similar foraging strategies in both species (Hindell et al., 1999). While studying heavy metals in the feathers of Larus dominicanus, Barbieri et al. (2009) showed that the levels of nickel concentration were higher in adults (5.92 µg·g−1) than in juveniles (2.23 µg·g−1). Similar levels of nickel have been detected in other seabird species from different parts of the world (Norheim, 1987). Adults have had several years to accumulate metals in their internal tissues; these can be mobilized into the blood and deposited in feathers during their formation (Burger, 1994). Elsewhere, Burger and Gochfeld (1991) pointed to heavy metal concentrations in feathers of adult birds that may reflect exposure obtained at other time of the year, including exposure at non-breeding areas. On the other hand, while they were studying heavy metal concentrations in the feathers of Herring Gulls (Larus argentatus) in Captree, Long Island, they showed that the cadmium concentration was higher in juveniles but the lead concentration was higher in adults (Burger, 1995). Differences in levels of metal concentrations in adults and fledglings might also occur if adults and young eat different types of food during the breeding season, or different-sized food items (Burger, 1996).

    Research has indicated that the concentration of heavy metals in the tissues of migratory birds is higher than that in resident birds (Pacyna et al., 2006; Zamani-Ahmadmahmoodi et al., 2009b). Siberian Gulls are winter visitors to Hara Biosphere Reserve, while Western Reef Heron are residents there. The results of the current study show that the amount of nickel in the Siberian Gull feathers is higher than in the Western Reef Heron.

    The results of three-way ANOVA showed there were significant differences between the Western Reef Heron and Siberian Gull (p < 0.01). The Siberian Gull showed higher nickel concentrations than the Western Reef Heron. Birds that are large fish eaters should accumulate higher levels than those that eat a range of different foods or smaller fish. Furthermore, levels of metal in birds should reflect the levels in the fish they consume (Burger, 2002). The main difference in nickel levels between Western Reef Heron and Siberian Gull could be the result of different phylogenetic origin and physiology (Teal, 1969; Welty, 1975; Deng et al. 2007), or because they grow their feathers in different breeding areas with different levels of background contamination. Also, metabolic rates vary inversely with body weight and directly with activities such as flight and rest. Being smaller than Western Reef Heron, Siberian Gull was expected to have a higher metabolic rate. Higher metabolic rates may cause fast accumulations of trace nickel in the Siberian Gull. In general, the Siberian Gull eats more invertebrates than the Western Reef Heron, catches some larger fish (between 20–25 cm in size), consumes offal discarded by fishing boats and eats dead fish found along the shore, while the Western Reef Heron eats smaller fish, amphibians and insects.

  • Alivizatos H, Goutner V, Karandinos MG. Reproduction and behaviour of the Long-legged Buzzard (Buteo rufinus) in North-eastern Greece. Die Vogelwarte. 1998;39: 176-82.
    Andersen DE, Rongstad OJ, Mytton WR. Home range changes in raptors exposed to increased human activity levels in southeastern Colorado. Wildl Soc Bull. 1990;18: 134-42.
    Boev N. Données sur l'étendue de l'aire d'habitat estivale de certaines espèces d'oiseaux en Bulgarie. Bull de l'Institut de Zoologie et Musée, BAS. 1962;11: 31-46 (in Bulgarian, summary in French).
    Brambilla M, Rubolini D, Guidali F. Factors affecting breeding habitat selection in a cliff-nesting peregrine Falco peregrinus population. J Ornithol. 2006;147: 428-35.
    Cade T, Martell M, Redig P, Septon G, Tordoff H. Peregrine Falcons in urban north America. In: Bird D, Varland D, Negro J, editors. Raptor in human landscapes: adaptation to built and cultivated environments. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996. p. 3-13.
    Carrete M, Tella JL, Blanco G, Bertellotti M. Effects of habitat degradation on the abundance, richness and diversity of raptors across Neotropical biomes. Biol Conserv. 2009;142: 2002-11.
    Crick HQP, Ratcliffe DA. The Peregrine Falco peregrinus breeding population of the United Kingdom in 1991. Bird Study. 1995;42: 1-19.
    Demerdzhiev D, Dobrev V, Popgeorgiev G. Effects of habitat change on territory occupancy, breeding density and breeding success of Long-legged Buzzard (Buteo rufinus Cretzschmar, 1927) in Besaparski Ridove Spatial Protection Area (Natura 2000), southern Bulgaria. Acta Zool Bulg. 2014;5(Suppl): 191-200.
    Emison WB, White CM, Hurley VG, Brimm DJ. Factors influencing the breeding distribution of the peregrine falcon in Victoria, Australia. Wildlife Res. 1997;24: 433-44.
    Esteves CF, de Barros Ferraz SF, de Barros Ferraz KM, Galetti M, Theobald DM. Human accessibility modelling applied to protected areas management. Nat Conservação. 2011;9: 232-9.
    Fernández JM, Gurrutxaga M. Habitat suitability models for assessing bird conservation goals in spatial protection areas. Ardeola. 2010;57: 79-91.
    Gainzarain JA, Arambarri R, Rodríguez AF. Breeding density, habitat selection and reproductive rates of the Peregrine falcon Falco pererinus in Alava (northern Spain). Bird Study. 2000;47: 225-31.
    Greenwood JJD. Basic techniques. In: Sutherland WJ, editor. Ecological census techniques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. p. 11-110.
    Gruev B, Kuzmanov B. General Biogeography. Sofia: University Press; 1994. (in Bulgarian).
    Jenkins AR. Hunting mode and success of African Peregrines Falco peregrinus minor: does nesting habitat quality affect foraging efficiency? Ibis. 2000;142: 235-46.
    Jenkins AR, van Zyl AJ. Conservation status and community structure of cliff-nesting raptors and ravens on the Cape Peninsula. South Africa Ostrich. 2005;76: 175-84.
    Jobe RT, White PS. A new cost-distance model for human accessibility and an evaluation of accessibility bias in permanent vegetation plots in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA. J Veg Sci. 2009;20: 1099-109.
    Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki ML, Jokimäki J, Huhta E, Ukkola M, Helle P, Ollila T. Territory occupancy and breeding success of the Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) around tourist destinations in northern Finland. Ornis Fennica. 2008;85: 2-12.
    Karyakin IV, Nikolenko EG. Peregrine Falcon in the Altai-Sayan Region. Russia Raptors Conserv. 2009;16: 96-128.
    Kopralev I. Geography of Bulgaria. Publisher For Com; 2002 (in Bulgarian).
    LaRue MA, Nielsen CK. Modelling potential dispersal corridors for cougars in midwestern North America using least-cost path methods. Ecol Model. 2008;212: 372-81.
    Michev T, Vatev IT, Simeonov PS, Profirov L. Distribution and Nesting of the Long-Legged Buzzard (Buteo rufinus (Cretzchmar, 1827) in Bulgaria. Ecology. 1984;13: 74-82 (in Bulgarian).
    Milchev B. Breeding bird atlas of the Strandja mountains, south-east Bulgaria. Sandgrouse. 1994;16: 2-27.
    Milchev B. Breeding biology of the Long-legged Buzzard Buteo rufinus in SE Bulgaria, nesting also in quarries. Avocetta. 2009;33: 25-32.
    Milchev B, Georgiewa U. Eine Studie zum Bestand, zur Brutbiologie und Ernӓhrug des Steinadlers, Aquila chrysaetos (L.) im Strandsha - Gebirge. Beitr Vogelkd. 1992;38: 327-34.
    Minetti AE, Moia C, Roi GS, Susta D, Ferretti G. Energy cost of walking and running at extreme uphill and downhill slopes. J Appl Physiol. 2002;93: 1039-46.
    Moore N, Kelly P, Lang F. Quarrynesting by Peregrine falcons in Ireland. Irish Birds. 1992;4: 519-24.
    Moore NP, Kelly PF, Lang FA, Lynch JM, Langton SD. The Peregrine Falco peregrinus in quarries: current status and factors influencing occupancy in the Republic of Ireland. Bird Study. 1997;44: 176-81.
    Mrlik V, Landsfeld B. The occurrence of Long-legged Buzzard (Buteo rufinus) in parts of Central Europe during 1980-1998 and possible factors for its recent expansion. Egretta. 2002;45: 104-14.
    Newton I. Population ecology of raptors. Berkhamsted: T & AD Poyser; 1979.
    Nikolov I. Photo guide of Bulgarian waterfalls. Sofia: Biko Bulgaria; 2013.
    Pedrini P, Sergio F. Density, productivity, diet and human persecution of Golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) in the central-eastern Italian Alps. J Raptor Res. 2001;35: 40-8.
    Perona AM, Urios V, López-López P. Holidays? Not for all. Eagles have larger home ranges on holidays as a consequence of human disturbance. Biol Conserv. 2019;231: 59-66.
    Petrov T, Tonchev B, Demerdjiev D, Daskalova G, Stoynov E. Golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos). In: Atlas of the breeding birds in Bulgaria. Conservation series/book 10. Sofia: BSPB; 2007 (in Bulgarian).
    Petrov TS, Spiridonov J, Domuschiev D, Kurtev M. Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos, Linnaeus, 1758). In: Red data book of the Republic of Bulgaria, Vol 2. Animals. Sofia: BAS & MOEW; 2015 (in Bulgarian).
    Ragyov D, Demerdzhiev D, Angelov I. Peregrine in Bulgaria - general overview. In: Sielicki J, Mizera T, editors. Peregrine Falcon populations - status and perspectives in the 21st century. Turul, Warsaw: European Peregrine Falcon Working Group, Society for the Protection of Wild Animals "Falcon"; 2008. p. 345-60.
    Redinov KO. Ecology of the Long-legged Buzzard in Mykolayiv region (Southern Ukraine). Berkut. 2010;19: 116-32 (in Russian).
    Russo D. Effects of land abandonment on animal species in Europe: conservation and management implications. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the EuropeanCommunities; 2006.
    Schadt S, Knauer F, Kaczensky P, Revilla E, Wiegand T, Trepl L. Rule-based assessment of suitable habitat and patch connectivity for the Eurasian lynx. Ecol Appl. 2002;12: 1469-83.
    Sergio F, Newton I, Marchesi L, Pedrini P. Ecologically justified charisma: preservation of top predators delivers biodiversity conservation. J Appl Ecol. 2006;43: 1049-55.
    Sergio F, Rizzoli F, Marchesi L, Pedrini P. The importance of interspecific interactions for breeding-site selection: peregrine falcons seek proximity to raven nests. Ecography. 2004;27: 818-26.
    Shafaeipour A. Breeding success and nest characteristics of Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos in western Iran. Acta Zool Bulg. 2015;67: 299-302.
    Simeonov S, Michev T, Nankinov D. Fauna of Bulgaria, Vol. 20 Aves, Part I. Sofia: BAS; 1990 (in Bulgarian).
    Spaul RJ, Heath JA. Nonmotorized recreation and motorized recreation in shrub-steppe habitats affects behavior and reproduction of golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos). Ecol Evol. 2016;6: 8037-49.
    Spaul RJ, Heath JA. Flushing responses of Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) in response to recreation. Wilson J Ornithol. 2017;129: 834-45.
    Stoyanov G. Peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus). Acrocephalus. 2003;24: 41-2.
    Stoyanov GP, Borisov B, Antonov A, Domuschiev D, Petrov T. Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus, Tunstall, 1771). In: Golemanski V, editor. Red data book of the Republic of Bulgaria. Animals, vol. 2. Sofia: BAS & MOEW; 2015 (in Bulgarian).
    Stoychev S, Demerdzhiev D, et al. Long-legged Buzzard Buteo rufinus. In: Keller V, Herrando S, Voříšek P, Franch M, Kipson M, Milanesi P, et al., editors. European breeding bird atlas 2: distribution, abundance and change. Barcelona: European Bird Census Council & Lynx Editions; 2020. p. 480.
    Stoynov E, Petrov T, Tonchev B, Ruskov K, Hristov H, Profirov L. Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus). In: Atlas of the breeding birds in Bulgaria. Conservation series/book 10. Sofia: BSPB; 2007. p. 188-9 (in Bulgarian).
    Tapia L, Domínguez J, Rodríguez L. Hunting habitat preferences of raptors in a mountainous area (Northwestern Spain). Pol J Ecol. 2008;56: 323-33.
    Tjernberg M. Habitat and nest site features of golden eagles Aquila chrysaetos (L.), in Sweden. Swed Wildl Res. 1983;12: 131-63.
    Trombulak SC, Frissell CA. Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conserv Biol. 2000;14: 18-30.
    Vatev I. Notes on the breeding biology of the Long-legged Buzzard (Buteo rufinus) in Bulgaria. J Raptor Res. 1987;21: 8-13.
    Vatev I, Angelov I, Domuschiev D, Profirov L. Long-legged Buzzard (Buteo rufinus, Cretzschmar, 1827). In: Red data book of the Republic of Bulgaria. Animals, vol. 2. Sofia: BAS & MOEW; 2015 (in Bulgarian).
    Vazhov SV. Some features of the ecological niches of raptors in the Russian part of the altai foothills. Raptors Conserv. 2012;25: 115-25 (in Russian).
    Watson J, Dennis RH. Nest-site selection by Golden Eagles Aquila chrysaetos in Scotland. British Birds. 1992;85: 469-81.
    Watson J. The Golden Eagle and pastoralism across Europe. In: Curtis DJ, Bignal EM, Curtis MA, editors. Birds and pastoral agriculture in Europe. Peterborough: JNCC; 1991. p. 56-7.
    Watson J. Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos breeding success and afforestation in Argyll. Bird Study. 1992;39: 203-6.
    Watson J. The golden eagle. London: T & AD Poyser; 1997.
    Whitfield DP, Fielding AH, Gregory MJP, Gordon AG, McLeod DRA, Haworth PF. Complex effects of habitat loss on Golden Eagles Aquila chrysaetos. Ibis. 2007;149: 26-36.
    Xirouchakis S. The Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos in Crete. Distribution, population status and conservation problems. Avocetta. 2001;25: 275-81.
  • Related Articles

Catalog

    Figures(5)  /  Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (947) PDF downloads (8) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return