Jairo Andrés Cuta-Pineda, Luis Alejandro Arias-Sosa, Roxibell C. Pelayo. 2021: The flowerpiercers interactions with a community of high Andean plants. Avian Research, 12(1): 22. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-021-00256-7
Citation: Jairo Andrés Cuta-Pineda, Luis Alejandro Arias-Sosa, Roxibell C. Pelayo. 2021: The flowerpiercers interactions with a community of high Andean plants. Avian Research, 12(1): 22. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-021-00256-7

The flowerpiercers interactions with a community of high Andean plants

More Information
  • Background 

    Flowerpiercers (Diglossa) are traditionally considered as "parasites" of the pollination processes, as they can access the nectar without entering in contact with the reproductive structures of the plants. Nevertheless, the effect of flowerpiercers seems to vary according to their behavior and the flower's traits. So, in this work, we aimed to explore the floral characteristics that may determine the susceptibility to robbing and pollen transport by flowerpiercers. Also, we identified the potential types of interactions and studied interaction network properties.

    Methods 

    We collected the information of 16 ornithophilic plants regarding their floral traits and robbing frequency. Also, we captured 4 species of flowerpiercers and evaluated pollen transport (frequency and loads). We tested the correlation between floral traits, robbing frequency, and pollen transportation. Later, we used these variables in a cluster and principal component analyses to identify the potential types of interactions. Finally, we analyzed and compared the structure of the plants-flowerpiercers interaction network.

    Results 

    Nectar production significantly influenced both nectar robbing and pollen transportation. While the corolla length was only correlated to the robbing susceptibility. Also, we found that particular flowerpiercers species transported higher loads of some plant pollen, which can be related to the differences in behavior and morphometric traits. We proposed the classification of five different types of plant-flowerpiercer interactions, that showed different potential mutualist or antagonist relations based on the affectation of nectar robbing and the service of pollen transportation. The interaction networks consisted of 49 links, with 2.4 links per species, and presented indicators of a medium to high resilience, stability, and resistance (nestedness, connectance, and robustness). Also, the network presented medium to low specialization and substantial niche overlap.

    Conclusions 

    The ecological role of the flowerpiercers goes beyond its classic assignation as "parasites" as they can actively transport pollen of several Andean plants, affecting its evolutionary history and the stability of the systems.

  • Clutch size and incubation are important components of avian reproduction (Wiebe and Martin, 1995, 2000). As a typical life-history trait in avian species, clutch size reflects the diverse breeding investments of females. The variations in clutch size may influence offspring quality and contribute to variations in offspring survival (Martin et al., 2000; Christians, 2002; Hope et al., 2021). Incubating birds usually need to strike a balance between their own physiological needs and the thermal requirements of embryonic development (Conway and Martin, 2000a; Cresswell et al., 2003). In addition, incubation behaviors play a crucial role in determining the reproductive success and survival of incubating birds, reflecting their adaptive strategies in response to the environment (Spiegel et al., 2012). Therefore, it is essential to comprehend the life-history strategies of avian species by gaining an understanding of clutch size, incubation behavior, and potential factors that may affect them (Conway and Martin, 2000b; Evans et al., 2009; Mougeot et al., 2014). Exploring factors that influence the life-history traits and reproductive behaviors of endangered species can provide valuable insights into the underlying mechanisms of population decline and develop effective management strategies (Van Turnhout et al., 2010).

    Large clutch size incurs high reproductive costs for females, including reductions in future fecundity, and survival (Williams, 2005). Clutch size may be influenced by spring weather during and before the egg-laying period (Cresswell and McCleery, 2003). Therefore, it is essential for females to maintain an optimal clutch size to effectively adapt to changes in weather conditions (Pendlebury and Bryant, 2005; Conrey et al., 2016). Besides, the incubation behavior of birds can be influenced by a variety of factors, including abiotic factors such as ambient temperature, precipitation, and solar radiation (Brown and Downs, 2003; Coe et al., 2015; Amininasab et al., 2016), as well as biotic factors such as predation risks, human disturbance, weight and age of incubating birds (Cervencl et al., 2011; Spiegel et al., 2012; Tombre et al., 2012; Brynychová et al., 2020). In species with uniparental incubation, incubating birds are usually considered to be constrained by their physiological conditions and ability to store nutrients, and must balance the time spent in foraging and incubating (Cresswell et al., 2004; Setash et al., 2021). Because foraging outside the nest may expose their eggs to the risks of cooling or overheating as the changing ambient temperatures are usually outside the optimal temperature range for embryonic development (Brown and Downs, 2003; DuRant et al., 2013; Mougeot et al., 2014). For instance, lower ambient temperatures may lead to a reduced recess frequency and duration of incubating birds (Bueno-Enciso et al., 2017). Precipitation is also assumed to affect the incubation behavior of birds, as some species, especially those with open or ground nests vulnerable to soaking, may choose to stay at the nests to protect embryos (Martin et al., 2017; Schöll et al., 2019). For example, Coe et al. (2015) have found that female Tree Swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) tend to spend less time outside their nests when precipitation occurs. Therefore, ambient temperature and precipitation play a crucial role in shaping the incubation behavior of birds.

    Reeves's Pheasant (Syrmaticus reevesii), a threatened species endemic to China that lives in mountainous forests, has been listed as "Vulnerable" on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List (IUCN, 2022). A previous study on Reeves's Pheasant based on radio tracking has given us a preliminary understanding of its incubation behavior (Zhang et al., 2004). However, that study was only based on five nests from four females, and it did not analyze the relationships between environmental factors (e.g., ambient temperature and precipitation) and the incubation behavior of Reeves's Pheasant. The current limited knowledge of the reproductive ecology of Reeves's Pheasant poses a significant obstacle to the effective implementation of conservation and management strategies aimed at safeguarding its population.

    To this end, our study used satellite tracking, a more effective and less intrusive tool, to monitor the incubation behavior of Reeves's Pheasant. This remote monitoring system does not need to visit targeted nests frequently during the incubation period, and can minimize the influence of human disturbance and the possible risk of nest predation. The main objective of this study was to investigate the clutch size and incubation behavior of Reeves's Pheasants and their responses to ambient temperature and precipitation. By providing essential ecological and reproductive information on Reeves's pheasant, this study will contribute valuable knowledge to the conservation of this species and related endangered pheasants.

    Reeves's Pheasant is an omnivorous species weighing about 950 g (female). It is characterized by female-only incubation (Zhang et al., 2004). This species constructs open-ground nests with a clutch of 8.9 and an incubation period of 26–27 days (Zhang et al., 2004). During incubation, females must do all their own foraging, as males do not assist with food provision or nest guard (Zhang et al., 2004). Potential nest predators include mammals (e.g., Haccoon Dog Nyctereutes procyonoides, Hog Badger Arctonyx collaris, Père David's Rock Squirrel Sciurotamias davidianus), birds (e.g., Eurasian Jay Garrulus glandarius, Red-billed Blue-Magpie Urocissa erythroryncha, and Eurasian Magpie Pica pica), as well as reptiles (e.g., King Rat Snake Elaphe carinata) (Wang et al., 2016).

    This study was conducted in Pingjingguan Village (31°51ʹ–31°52ʹ N, 113°54ʹ–113°55ʹ E, hereafter 'PJG') and Zhonghuashan Bird Provincial Nature Reserve (31°37ʹ–31°44ʹ N, 113°54ʹ–113°59ʹ E, hereafter 'ZHS') in Hubei Province, China (Fig. 1). PJG contains coniferous forests, deciduous broad-leaved forests and coniferous broad-leaved mixed forests at elevations of 130–850 m, with a mean annual temperature of 16 ℃ and an average annual precipitation ranging from 865 to 1070 mm. ZHS contains evergreen broad-leaved forests and coniferous broad-leaved mixed forests at elevations of 150–810 m, with a mean annual temperature of 16 ℃ and an average annual precipitation of 1022 mm. The two sites are about 22 km apart with similar climate conditions, and both are the main distribution areas of Reeves's Pheasant (Zhao et al., 2013; Zhou et al., 2015).

    Figure  1.  Map of the study area.

    From 2020 to 2023, we captured 27 adult female Reeves's Pheasants (18 in PJG; 9 in ZHS) using non-injury rope techniques and attached satellite trackers (LEGO, Chengdu, China) to them before the breeding season (Lu et al., 2022). Each satellite tracker weighs about 20 g, less than 3% of the body mass of an adult female Reeves's Pheasant (Lu et al., 2022). They were set to locate targeted individuals once an hour and record the overall dynamic body acceleration (ODBA) of each individual every 10 min. Online monitoring of the tracker's power facilitated timely adjustments. When low power was detected, we modified the ODBA collection frequency online (with no impact on animals) to once every 30 min to ensure continuous data collection, thereby ensuring that the recesses of female Reeves's Pheasants would not be missed. This adjustment was made for 80 out of the 350 incubation days. ODBA can detect the kinetic energy of wild animals and help us determine whether an individual is in a state of movement, which has been tested and applied in various species such as Polar Bears (Ursus maritimus), Pelagic Cormorants (Phalacrocorax pelagicus) and Bonelli's Eagles (Aquila fasciata) (Wilson et al., 2006; Stothart et al., 2016; Pagano and Williams, 2019; Lopez-Lopez et al., 2022).

    We recorded the clutch size when nests were first found. Besides, during 2020–2021, to minimize any potential disruption, we did not check the nests again after the first finding of nests unless there were anomalies in the location information or ODBA readings. In the cases where such anomalies were detected, we conducted nest examinations to determine whether predation or abandonment had occurred. From our observations during the two years, we noticed that female Reeves's Pheasants often left their nests in the afternoon (n = 212 days; Appendix Fig. S1). Therefore, in order to carry out additional studies, we specifically chose to perform periodic nest checks every two days in the afternoon from 2022 to 2023, precisely when females were most likely to leave the nest, aiming to minimize any disturbance to the nests during these inspections. Specifically, we would approach the nest from about 15 m away to detect the signal of the satellite tracker. If the signal was detected, it signified that the female was incubating eggs and the security of nest was ensured, thereby enabling us to avoid disturbing the incubating bird. Conversely, an absence of the signal indicated a possibility of foraging outside the nest, nest abandonment, or predation. In these cases, we took the opportunity to determine nest status.

    The ODBA of female Reeves's Pheasants was low and stable during incubation but changed rapidly when incubation was interrupted. This was confirmed by our observation that the ODBA values elevated when the tracker site was in motion (outside the nest), and the ODBA values kept low when the tracker site was stationary (coinciding with the nest location). Thus, the beginning of incubation was determined from a sharp decline in ODBA, the interruption of incubation was determined from a sharp increase in ODBA, and constant ODBA was interpreted as continuous incubation (Fig. 2). Based on the changes in ODBA, we determined whether the females started to incubate, and then searched for their nests according to the location information and recorded clutch size.

    Figure  2.  An example of ODBA changes with time for one female Reeves's Pheasant during the incubation period.

    A previous study has indicated that the egg-laying interval of Reeves's Pheasants is approximately 24 h (Zhang et al., 2004), which is similar to our observations. That study has also noted that females suddenly initiate incubation shortly after clutch completion (Zhang et al., 2004). As a result, based on the clutch size, the date of clutch completion, and the number of periodic visits by females to the nest before incubation started, the first egg-laying date was determined.

    Observations and records for this study were made over a 24-h period starting at 0:00 and ending at 24:00 every day. Since the first and last incubation days were not complete monitoring days (0:00–24:00), they were not included in the analysis. For each complete monitoring day of each nest, we calculated: (1) the number of recesses, estimated as the number of times a female left the nest per day; (2) recess duration, estimated as the duration (in minutes) of each off-bout (if the female did not leave the nest during a monitoring day, we recorded the recess duration for that day as 0 min); (3) nest attendance, estimated as the proportion of time a female devoted to incubation per day.

    We used the daily weather data (temporal resolution: every 1 h) from the nearest local weather station (Jigong Mountain weather station; altitude 730 m; 31.80° N, 114.07° E) provided by China Meteorological Data Service Center (http://data.cma.cn/), ~15 km away from both study areas (Fig. 1). For each nest, we calculated the average ambient temperature (averaged daily mean ambient temperature) during its egg-laying period. Additionally, we calculated the average daily precipitation during the egg-laying period for each nest, which was calculated as the total cumulative precipitation during the laying stage divided by the number of days of the laying stage. Furthermore, we collected the daily mean ambient temperature and daily precipitation of each day of incubation for all nests.

    In order to analyze the effects of ambient temperature and precipitation on clutch size, we employed linear mixed-effects models (LMM) with the package lme4 (Bates et al., 2015). We took clutch size as the response variable, and took average ambient temperature and average daily precipitation during the egg-laying period of each nest as fixed effects. We did not include "the first egg-laying date" as a fixed effect due to its high correlation with "average ambient temperature" (Pearson correlation coefficients |r| > 0.70). Female identity was treated as a random effect to account for instances where individual females were involved in more than one nest (7 females had 2 breeding attempts, 1 had 3 breeding attempts. Details in Appendix Table S1). In addition, year was considered as a random effect to address the differences between years. Since clutch size was not observed to respond to the interaction between temperature and precipitation, we removed this interaction according to backward-stepwise model selection (Whittingham et al., 2006; Zhang, 2016). The resulting final model (LMM) comprised only predictors with a substantial impact on clutch size (the result of the full model is shown in Appendix Table S2 and Table S3). Average ambient temperature and average daily precipitation exhibited low collinearity (variance inflation factors VIF < 2) and low Pearson correlation coefficients |r| < 0.10.

    To analyze the temporal distribution of recesses during the incubation period, we used the kernel density estimation method (package overlap, Ridout and Linkie, 2009) based on the timing of nest departures and returns.

    To examine the effects of ambient temperature and precipitation on recess decisions, we employed a binomial distribution generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) with a logit link function utilizing the lme4 package (Bates et al., 2015). The response variable was whether the female left the nest (1) or not (0) during the whole day, which referred to recess decisions. In order to investigate the influence of ambient temperature and precipitation on recess duration, we employed a Poisson distribution GLMM with a logit link. Furthermore, we analyzed nest attendance through a binomial distribution GLMM with a logit link, and the dependent variable was a matrix composed of two vectors: daily incubation minutes and daily recess minutes. Across all three models, we took daily mean ambient temperature, daily precipitation, and their interaction as fixed effects. Similar to the analysis of clutch size, we removed the insignificant interaction in the final model (Whittingham et al., 2006; Zhang, 2016). Other fixed effects included day of incubation and clutch size. Day of incubation was calculated, with day 1 being the day when females started incubation for each nest. Besides, female identity and year were also treated as random factors in all three models. We did not include "date" as a fixed effect in these models because of its high correlation with "day of incubation" (Pearson correlation coefficients |r| > 0.70). There was a low collinearity and correlation among the predictor variables of the three models, with all variance inflation factor (VIF) < 2 and all Pearson correlation coefficients |r| < 0.40.

    Note that, the recess behavior of female Reeves's Pheasants was not disturbed by our nest checks in 2022 and 2023, as the model analysis results were similar whether or not the datasets for 2022 and 2023 were included (also see the temporal distribution of recesses in Appendix Fig. S1, and Fig. 4B).

    Figure  3.  The relationship of average ambient temperature (A) and average daily precipitation (B) during the egg-laying period with the clutch size of Reeves's Pheasants. Dots represent the raw values. The black lines depict the model-predicted values, with 95% confidence intervals shown as shaded areas.
    Figure  4.  The variation in daily ambient temperature during the incubation period. Box-and-whisker plots show the median, interquartile range, and up to 1.5*IQR for ambient temperature (A). The temporal distribution of recesses during the incubation period (B).

    We reported "marginal r2 and conditional r2" to demonstrate the variation that the models could account for. Our statistical analyses were conducted in R version 4.1.3, with all values reported as mean ± SD. Furthermore, to plot illustrations with model predicted values, we generated model predictions using the "predict" function in R and reported 95% confidence intervals, while maintaining the constancy of other explanatory variables (clutch size was set to the median, and other variables were set to their respective mean values).

    A total of 350 incubation days (2020: n = 132 days; 2021: n = 80 days; 2022: n = 40 days; 2023: n = 98 days) for 36 nests from 27 female Reeves's Pheasants were monitored. The average clutch size of Reeves's Pheasant was 7.75 ± 1.36 (ranging from 5 to 11). Based on four successfully hatched nests, we found that the incubation period of Reeves's Pheasant lasted for 26–27 days, with an apparent nesting success of 11.11% (the rate of nests that successfully hatched compared with the total number of nests). During the incubation period, female Reeves's Pheasants took an average of 0.73 ± 0.46 recesses (ranging from 0 to 2) every 24 h. Specifically, they took 1 recess per day during 72% of the incubation days, took no recess during 27.4% of the incubation days, and took 2 recesses per day during 0.6% of the incubation days. The average recess duration was 100.80 ± 73.37 min (ranging from 0 to 340 min), and the corresponding nest attendance was 92.98 ± 5.27% (ranging from 64.17% to 100%) (Appendix Table S1).

    During the egg-laying period, the maximum temperature reached 33 ℃, the minimum temperature was −2 ℃, and the mean temperature was 15 ℃. A significant negative correlation was observed between clutch size and the average ambient temperature during the egg-laying period (Table 1, Fig. 3A), while a significant positive correlation was found between clutch size and the average daily precipitation during the egg-laying period (Table 1, Fig. 3B).

    Table  1.  The results of linear mixed-effects models analyzing the effects of average ambient temperature and average daily precipitation during the egg-laying period on the clutch size of Reeves's Pheasants. The significant effects are in bold (p < 0.05).
    Fixed effects Estimate ± SE t p
    (Intercept) 11.235 ± 0.793 14.166 < 0.001
    Average temperature −0.294 ± 0.048 −6.110 <0.001
    Average daily precipitation 0.174 ± 0.068 2.561 0.016
    Random effects Variance
    Female identity (Intercept) 1.038
    Year (Intercept) 0.000
    Residual 0.007
    Marginal r2/Conditional r2: 0.389/0.859
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    During the incubation period, the maximum temperature reached 34 ℃, the minimum temperature was 4 ℃, and the mean temperature was 19 ℃ (Fig. 4A). Approximately 60% of the cases of nest departure occurred between 13:00 and 16:00, and around 65% of the cases of nest return occurred between 15:00 and 18:00 (Fig. 4B). Notably, this recess temporal pattern corresponded with the period of elevated ambient temperatures during daylight hours.

    There was a significant negative correlation between daily precipitation and recess decisions, and Reeves's Pheasants rarely left their nests when daily precipitation was high (Table 2, Fig. 5). Recess duration was found to have a significant correlation with the interaction between daily mean ambient temperature and daily precipitation. Furthermore, recess duration showed a marked positive correlation with clutch size as well as a significant negative correlation with day of incubation (Table 3, Fig. 6). A significant correlation was identified between nest attendance and the interaction between daily mean ambient temperature and daily precipitation. Additionally, nest attendance displayed a marked positive correlation with day of incubation (Table 4, Fig. 7).

    Table  2.  The results of the generalized linear mixed model analyzing the effects of daily mean ambient temperature and daily precipitation on recess decisions. The significant effects are in bold (p < 0.05).
    Fixed effects Estimate ± SE z p
    Response: Recess decisions
    (Intercept) 0.475 ± 1.307 0.364 0.716
    Daily mean ambient temperature −0.034 ± 0.038 −0.896 0.370
    Daily precipitation −0.029 ± 0.012 −2.351 0.019
    Day of incubation −0.004 ± 0.024 −0.170 0.865
    Clutch size 0.170 ± 0.124 1.375 0.169
    Random effects Variance
    Female identity (Intercept) 0.282
    Year (Intercept) 0.000
    Residual 0.480
    Marginal r2/Conditional r2: 0.045/0.120
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure  5.  The relationship of daily precipitation with recess decisions (0: females do not leave the nest; 1: females leave the nest). The dots represent the raw values, and the black line depicts the model-predicted values, with 95% confidence intervals shown as shaded areas.
    Table  3.  The results of the generalized linear mixed model analyzing the effects of daily mean ambient temperature and daily precipitation on recess duration. The significant effects are in bold (p < 0.05).
    Fixed effects Estimate ± SE z p
    Response: Recess duration
    (Intercept) 4.902 ± 0.107 45.927 <0.001
    Daily mean ambient temperature −0.025 ± 0.002 −12.741 <0.001
    Daily precipitation −0.045 ± 0.003 −14.819 <0.001
    Daily mean ambient temperature * Daily precipitation 0.002 ± 0.0001 12.127 <0.001
    Day of incubation −0.0066 ± 0.001 −5.092 <0.001
    Clutch size 0.026 ± 0.010 2.522 0.012
    Random effects Variance
    Female identity (Intercept) 0.061
    Year (Intercept) 0.000
    Residual 0.861
    Marginal r2/Conditional r2: 0.299/0.905
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure  6.  The model-predicted relationships among daily mean ambient temperature, daily precipitation, and recess duration (A). The relationship of clutch size (B) and day of incubation (C) with recess duration. The dots represent the raw values, and the black lines depict the model-predicted values, with 95% confidence intervals shown as shaded areas.
    Table  4.  The results of the generalized linear mixed model analyzing the effects of daily mean ambient temperature and daily precipitation on nest attendance. The significant effects are in bold (p < 0.05).
    Fixed effects Estimate ± SE z p
    Response: Nest attendance
    (Intercept) 2.081 ± 0.107 19.461 <0.001
    Daily mean ambient temperature 0.027 ± 0.002 13.759 <0.001
    Daily precipitation 0.049 ± 0.003 15.434 <0.001
    Daily mean ambient temperature * Daily precipitation −0.002 ± 0.0002 −12.545 <0.001
    Day of incubation 0.008 ± 0.001 6.489 <0.001
    Clutch size −0.007 ± 0.010 −0.753 0.452
    Random effects Variance
    Female identity (Intercept) 0.076
    Year (Intercept) 0.000
    Residual −0.717
    Marginal r2/Conditional r2: 0.307/0.980
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure  7.  The model-predicted relationships among daily mean ambient temperature, daily precipitation, and nest attendance (A). The relationship of day of incubation (B) with nest attendance. The dots represent the raw values, and the black line depicts the model-predicted values, with 95% confidence intervals shown as shaded areas.

    We found that the clutch size and incubation behavior of female Reeves's Pheasants had a significant correlation with ambient temperature and precipitation. Female Reeves's Pheasants exhibited a distinctive incubation pattern which was characterized by a low recess frequency and a high nest attendance. This study represents the first exploration of the influence of weather conditions on the reproductive behavior of Reeves's Pheasants. These findings advance our understanding of the life-history traits of Reeves's Pheasants and reveal a crucial influence of weather conditions on their reproductive behavior.

    We observed that female Reeves's Pheasants laid fewer eggs in higher ambient temperatures, which may be associated with egg viability (Arnold et al., 1987; Stoleson and Beissinger, 1999; Cooper et al., 2005). In avian embryos, irregular development is expected when the ambient temperature exceeds the physiological zero (24–26 ℃) but remains below the range essential for normal embryo development (36–40 ℃). This is particularly noteworthy in the absence of contact incubation, as the incubating bird typically maintains the eggs within the optimal range of 36–40 ℃ (Webb, 1987; Veiga, 1992; Cooper et al., 2005). Reeves's Pheasants, deferring incubation until clutch completion, expose their eggs to fluctuating ambient conditions until the onset of contact incubation. The observed reduction in clutch size under warmer conditions may be attributed to that smaller clutches shorten the laying period, thereby minimizing the exposure of eggs to unfavorable thermal conditions. Moreover, considering the strong correlation between average ambient temperature and the first egg-laying date, it is reasonable to assume that clutch size potentially exhibits a seasonal decline, as observed in some other species (Decker et al., 2012; Karagicheva et al., 2016; Weiser et al., 2018). Additionally, female birds breeding multiple times may produce smaller clutches in subsequent breeding attempts (Rooneem and Robertson, 1997; Gasparini et al., 2006; Robinson et al., 2010). In this study, we could not exclude the possibility that the data of some females were not from their first nesting attempts because some females may have experienced failure in the egg-laying stage during initial breeding attempts but could not be detected by the tracking data. If this is the case, their subsequent nesting attempts, which might have smaller clutches, were more likely to occur when ambient temperature was higher. Also, some studies have shown that low-quality individuals may breed later and lay fewer eggs (Verhulst et al., 1995; Hipfner et al., 1997; Christians et al., 2001; Koenig and Walters, 2018), which could result in the negative relationship between ambient temperature and clutch size as well.

    The positive relationship between clutch size and average daily precipitation during the egg-laying period could be attributed to the promoting effect of precipitation on primary and secondary productivity (e.g., the biomass of protein-rich prey), which would cause an increase in food abundance and drive females to lay more eggs (Skagen and Adams, 2012). Precipitation may inhibit the activity of certain predators such as snakes (Morrison and Bolger, 2002; Grudinskaya et al., 2022). And the reduction in predator activity during the egg-laying period may thus serve as a proximate cue for overall predation risk, influencing clutch size decisions among birds (Zanette et al., 2011; Dillon and Conway, 2017). Moreover, visually hunting corvids generally target nests with poor concealability (Weidinger, 2002), and the rapid vegetation growth following precipitation provides better hiding possibilities for ground-open nests, thereby reducing the risk of predation (Ringelman and Skaggs, 2019; Laidlaw et al., 2020). Thus, clutch size may increase due to lower predator activity during precipitation and higher nest concealment afterward (Grudinskaya et al., 2022).

    Throughout the incubation period, female Reeves's Pheasants exhibited an unexpectedly low frequency of recesses, with an average of only 0.73 times per day. This differs from the typical behavior observed in most Galliforms, which generally take 2 to 7 recesses per day (Deeming, 2002). This uncommon nest activity pattern may potentially diminish the attractiveness to visually oriented predators, thereby lowering the risk of predation (Fontaine and Martin, 2006; Cervencl et al., 2011). A similar recess strategy has been also observed in Blood Pheasant (clutch size 7.8) and Sichuan Partridge (clutch size 5.0) which generally take a single recess per day (Jia et al., 2010; Fu et al., 2017). Interestingly, unlike species with lower attentiveness like Blood Pheasant (72.0%) and Sichuan Partridge (81.2%) (Jia et al., 2010; Fu et al., 2017), the female Reeves's Pheasant showed a significantly higher nest attendance (92.3%). It has been reported that high nest attendance can contribute to the rapid and stable development of embryos, ultimately leading to a shortened incubation period (Thompson and Raveling, 1987; Hepp et al., 2006; Carter et al., 2014), which may account for why Reeves's Pheasant had a shorter incubation period (26–27 days) than Blood Pheasant (37 days) and Sichuan Partridge (29 days) (Jia et al., 2010; Fu et al., 2017). Taken together, the unique incubation pattern with a low recess frequency and a high nest attendance may help alleviate predation pressure, reduce the frequency of reheating eggs, and minimize physiological costs of female Reeves's Pheasant.

    The temporal distribution of recesses holds a pivotal role in shaping the survival of incubating birds and embryos, and is potentially influenced by surrounding ambient temperature (Winder et al., 2016). Previous studies have indicated that colder nighttime temperatures may cause fasting females to experience increased energy demands at dawn and subsequently forage at dusk to replenish their overnight energy reserves (Wiebe and Martin, 1997; Moiron et al., 2018; Schöll et al., 2019). If incubating females prioritize their physiological needs, recesses can potentially occur more frequently during dawn and dusk periods. However, in contrast to this expectation, our observations consistently showed that female Reeves's Pheasants exhibited a preference for leaving nests during the warmer afternoon hours. Furthermore, the timing of their recesses followed a distinct unimodal pattern in response to the changing ambient temperature.

    This behavior seems to be adaptive as the females chose to forage at a higher ambient temperature, allowing their eggs to cool gradually and preventing the adverse effects of low temperatures on embryonic development. Additionally, this strategy minimized the time and effort required to reheat the eggs. The unimodal pattern of recess timing may be driven primarily by embryonic thermal needs rather than by the physiological needs of incubating females, which contrasts with the bimodal recess pattern observed in species like Chinese Grouse (Tetrastes sewerzowi) (Shi et al., 2019), Greater Prairie-chickens (Tympanuchus cupido) (Winder et al., 2016), and Greater Sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) (Coates and Delehanty, 2008).

    We observed a distinct relationship between daily precipitation and recess decisions. Non-recess during higher precipitation days may serve to avoid direct wetting and cooling of the eggs. This behavior could also potentially be attributed to the reduced foraging efficiency (decreased availability of protein-rich prey) and heightened foraging costs on rainy days (Nooker et al., 2005).

    The interaction between daily mean ambient temperature and daily precipitation was strongly associated with recess duration and nest attendance. In warm and dry weather, females exhibited shorter recess duration compared to cold and dry or warm and rainy weather. Furthermore, in cold and dry weather or warm and rainy weather, females had longer recess duration in comparison to warm and dry weather or cold and rainy weather. A previous study on the incubation behavior in a passerine bird has shown that foraging efficiency is reduced during low ambient temperatures and dry weather (Bambini et al., 2019). Besides, females are more susceptible to energy constraints due to increased basal metabolism and incubation costs in low temperatures (Bryan and Bryant, 1999). As a result, they need to spend more time foraging to cope with the high energy expenditure (Tulp and Schekkerman, 2006; Diez-Méndez et al., 2021). During low ambient temperatures and rainy weather, the expenses associated with foraging may surpass the energy benefits gained (Bambini et al., 2019). Furthermore, for uniparental avian species like Reeves's Pheasant which constructs open nests on the ground, the presence of females in the nest during low ambient temperatures and precipitation seems to serve as protection for their eggs, shielding them from cold weather and rain (Coe et al., 2015). On the other hand, foraging efficiency is higher in warm and dry days than in warm and rainy days (Bambini et al., 2019), thus allowing females to spend less time foraging.

    As incubation progresses, embryos become more sensitive to temperature variations and less tolerant to low temperatures (Batt and Cornwell, 1972; Webb, 1987). Moreover, the heat loss rate of eggs increases gradually as embryos develop (Cooper and Voss, 2013). In our study, the variation in both recess duration and nest attendance based on day of incubation suggested that female Reeves's Pheasants adjusted their time and energy investment in incubation according to embryonic development. A similar trend has also been observed in Blood Pheasant, with nest attendance starting at around 67% at the beginning of incubation and increasing to 82% in the later stages of incubation (Jia et al., 2010). Furthermore, we found a positive correlation between clutch size and recess duration. This relationship could be attributed to the slower cooling of larger clutches compared to smaller ones, enabling females to leave nests for more extended periods (Reid et al., 2000).

    Our research revealed a complex relationship between weather conditions (i.e. ambient temperature and precipitation) and both the clutch size and incubation behavior of Reeves's Pheasant, which significantly enriches our knowledge of the previously unknown life-history features and strategies of this vulnerable species. Considering its decreasing population trend and the low nest success in the wild, future studies should further investigate how ecological factors such as food availability and predation risk influence the reproductive behavior of Reeves's Pheasant. A comprehensive understanding of these factors will enable conservationists to develop targeted strategies to protect nesting sites, manage habitat, and mitigate potential threats to support successful reproduction and population growth of this species.

    The study protocol and field procedures were approved by the forestry department and by the Ethics and Animal Welfare Committee from Beijing Forestry University, approval number EAWC_BJFU_2021018.

    Ting Jin: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Shuai Lu: Investigation. Yunqi Wang: Investigation. Junqin Hua: Writing – review & editing, Methodology. Zhengxiao Liu: Writing – review & editing, Validation. Qian Hu: Writing – review & editing, Validation. Yating Liu: Writing – review & editing. Yuze Zhao: Writing – review & editing. Jianqiang Li: Writing – review & editing. Jiliang Xu: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Conceptualization.

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    We thank the Forestry Department of Hubei Provinces for granting permission and support for this work, and the residents for their help in fieldwork. We thank the anonymous reviewers for their useful comments and suggestions.

    Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avrs.2024.100168.

  • Adedoja O, Dormann CF, Kehinde T, Samways MJ. Refuges from fire maintain pollinator–plant interaction networks. Ecol Evol. 2019;9: 5777–86.
    Aguilar JM, Tinoco BA. Pollination ecology of Axinaea merianiae in the high Andes from south Ecuador: nectar characteristics and bird pollinators. ACI Avances En Ciencias E Ingenierías. 2017. .
    Almeida-Neto M, Guimarães P, Guimarães PR, Loyola RD, Ulrich W. A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement. Oikos. 2008;117: 1227–39.
    Ballantyne G, Baldock KCR, Willmer PG. Constructing more informative plant-pollinator networks: visitation and pollen deposition networks in a heathland plant community. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2015;282: 20151130.
    Baumgartner MT. Connectance and nestedness as stabilizing factors in response to pulse disturbances in adaptive antagonistic networks. J Theor Biol. 2020;486: 110073.
    Burgos E, Ceva H, Perazzo RPJ, Devoto M, Medan D, Zimmermann M, et al. Why nestedness in mutualistic networks? J Theor Biol. 2007;249: 307–13.
    Campbell C, Yang S, Albert R, Shea K. A network model for plant-pollinator community assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108: 197–202.
    Cantor M, Pires MM, Marquitti FMD, Raimundo RLG, Sebastián-González E, Coltri PP, et al. Nestedness across biological scales. PLoS ONE. 2017;12: e0171691.
    Castro S, Silveira P, Navarro L. Floral traits variation, legitimate pollination, and nectar robbing in Polygala vayredae (Polygalaceae). Ecol Res. 2009;24: 47–55.
    Chapman CA, Wrangham R, Chapman LJ. Indices of habitat-wide fruit abundance in tropical forest. Biotropica. 1994;26: 160–71.
    Cronk Q, Ojeda I. Bird-pollinated flowers in an evolutionary and molecular context. J Exp Bot. 2008;59: 715–27.
    Cuevas E, Rosas-Guerrero V. Spatio-temporal variation of nectar robbing in Salvia gesneriflora and its effects on nectar production and legitimate visitors. Plant Biol. 2016;18: 9–14.
    del Carmen Pelayo Escalona R. Implicaciones ecológicas y evolutivas del robo de néctar en ecosistemas neotropicales venezolanos. Doctoral's Thesis. Vigo: Universidad de Vigo; 2017.
    Dellinger AS, Penneys DS, Staedler YM, Fragner L, Weckwerth W, Schönenberger J. A specialized bird pollination system with a bellows mechanism for pollen transfer and staminal food body rewards. Curr Biol. 2014;24: 1615–9.
    Dormann CF, Gruber B, Fründ J. Introducing the bipartite package: analysing ecological networks. R News. 2008;8: 8–11.
    Dormann CF, Fründ J, Blüthgen N, Gruber B. Indices, graphs and null models: analyzing bipartite ecological networks. Open Ecol J. 2009;2: 7–24.
    Fleming TH, Muchhala N. Nectar-feeding bird and bat niches in two worlds: pantropical comparisons of vertebrate pollination systems. J Biogeogr. 2008;35: 764–80.
    Gonzalez O, Loiselle BA. Species interactions in an Andean bird-flowering plant network: phenology is more important than abundance or morphology. PeerJ. 2016;4: e2789.
    Graves GR. Pollination of a Tristerix mistletoe (Loranthaceae) by Diglossa (Aves, Thraupidae). Biotropica. 1982;14: 316–7.
    Gresty CEA, Clare E, Devey DS, Cowan RS, Csiba L, Malakasi P, et al. Flower preferences and pollen transport networks for cavity-nesting solitary bees: implications for the design of agri-environment schemes. Ecol Evol. 2018;8: 7574–87.
    Hazlehurst JA, Karubian JO. Nectar robbing impacts pollinator behavior but not plant reproduction. Oikos. 2016;125: 1668–76.
    Hazlehurst JA, Karubian JO. Impacts of nectar robbing on the foraging ecology of a territorial hummingbird. Behav Processes. 2018;149: 27–34.
    Hu L, Dong Y, Sun S. Relative species abundance successfully predicts nestedness and interaction frequency of monthly pollination networks in an alpine meadow. PLoS ONE. 2019;14: e0224316.
    IDEAM. Reportes de precipitación Pachavita-Boyacá. Pachavita; 2016.
    Irwin RE, Brody AK. Nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata: effects on pollinator behavior and plant fitness. Oecologia. 1998;116: 519–27.
    Irwin RE, Bronstein JL, Manson JS, Richardson L. Nectar robbing: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2010;41: 271–92.
    Johnson SD. The pollination niche and its role in the diversification and maintenance of the southern African flora. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2010;365: 499–516.
    Kearns CA, Inouye DW, Waser NM. Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant-pollinator interactions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1998;29: 83–112.
    Kuhnen VV, Romero GQ, Linhares AX, Vizentin-Bugoni J, Porto EAC, Setz EZF. Diet overlap and spatial segregation between two neotropical marsupials revealed by multiple analytical approaches. PLoS ONE. 2017;12: e0181188.
    Lara C, Ornelas J. Preferential nectar robbing of flowers with long corollas: experimental studies of two hummingbird species visiting three plant species. Oecologia. 2001;128: 263–73.
    Maruyama PK, Vizentin-Bugoni J, Dalsgaard B, Sazima I, Sazima M. Nectar robbery by a hermit hummingbird: association to floral phenotype and its influence on flowers and network structure. Oecologia. 2015;178: 783–93.
    Memmott J. Food webs: a ladder for picking strawberries or a practical tool for practical problems? Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2009;364: 1693–9.
    Memmott J, Waser NM, Price MV. Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2004;271: 2605–11.
    Montoya JM, Pimm SL, Solé RV. Ecological networks and their fragility. Nature. 2006;442: 259–64.
    Navarro L. Pollination ecology of Anthyllis vulneraria subsp. vulgaris (Fabaceae): nectar robbers as pollinators. Am J Bot. 2000;87: 980–5.
    Navarro L. Reproductive biology and effect of nectar robbing on fruit production in Macleania bullata (Ericaceae). Plant Ecol. 2001;152: 59–65.
    Navarro L, Guitián P, Ayensa G. Pollination ecology of Disterigma stereophyllum (Ericaceae) in south-western Colombia. Plant Biol. 2008;10: 512–8.
    Navarro L, Medel R. Relationship between floral tube length and nectar robbing in Duranta erecta L. (Verbenaceae). Biol J Linn Soc. 2009;96: 392–8.
    Novella-Fernandez R, Rodrigo A, Arnan X, Bosch J. Interaction strength in plant-pollinator networks: are we using the right measure? PLoS ONE. 2019;14: e0225930.
    Ollerton J, Winfree R, Tarrant S. How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos. 2011;120: 321–6.
    Parada-Quintero M, Alarcón-Jiménez D, Rosero-Lasprilla L. Flowering phenology of ornithophilous species from the lower stratum in two High-Andean habitats in the Parque Natural Municipal Rancheria (Paipa-Boyacá-Colombia). Caldasia. 2012;34: 139–54.
    Pelayo RC, Rengifo C, Soriano PJ. Avian nectar robbers of Passiflora mixta (Passifloraceae): do they have a positive effect on the plant? Interciencia. 2011;36: 587–92.
    Pelayo RC, Soriano PJ, Márquez NJ, Navarro L. Phenological patterns and pollination network structure in a Venezuelan páramo: a community-scale perspective on plant-animal interactions. Plant Ecol Divers. 2019;12: 607–18.
    Popic TJ, Wardle GM, Davila YC. Flower-visitor networks only partially predict the function of pollen transport by bees. Austral Ecol. 2013;38: 76–86.
    Richardson SC. Are nectar-robbers mutualists or antagonists? Oecologia. 2004;139: 246–54.
    Roitman GG, Montaldo NH, Medan D. Pollination biology of Myrrhinium atropurpureum (Myrtaceae): sweet, fleshy petals attract frugivorous birds. Biotropica. 1997;29: 162–8.
    Rojas-Nossa SV. Ecología de la comunidad de pinchaflores (Aves: Diglossa y Diglossopis) en un bosque Altoandino. Universida Nacional de Colombia; 2005.
    Rojas-Nossa SV. Strategies of nectar extraction by flowerpiercers (Aves: Diglossa and Diglossopis) and their effects on the pollination of high Andean plants. Ornitol Colomb. 2007;5: 21–39.
    Rojas-Nossa SV. Association between nectar robbing and floral characteristics in a montane community of the Colombian Andes. Ecosistemas. 2013;22: 107–12.
    Rojas-Nossa SV, Sánchez JM, Navarro L. Nectar robbing: a common phenomenon mainly determined by accessibility constraints, nectar volume and density of energy rewards. Oikos. 2016a;125: 1044–55.
    Rojas-Nossa SV, Sánchez JM, Navarro L. Effects of nectar robbing on male and female reproductive success of a pollinator-dependent plant. Ann Bot. 2016b;117: 291–7.
    Roubik DW. The ecological impact of nectar-robbing bees and pollinating hummingbirds on a tropical shrub. Ecology. 1982;63: 354–60.
    Saavedra S, Rohr RP, Olesen JM, Bascompte J. Nested species interactions promote feasibility over stability during the assembly of a pollinator community. Ecol Evol. 2016;6: 997–1007.
    Schondube JE, del Rio CM. The flowerpiercers' hook: an experimental test of an evolutionary trade-off. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2003;270: 195–8.
    Schondube JE, del Rio CM. Sugar and protein digestion in flowerpiercers and hummingbirds: a comparative test of adaptive convergence. J Comp Physiol B. 2004;174: 263–73.
    Singh VK, Barman C, Tandon R. Nectar robbing positively influences the reproductive success of Tecomella undulata (Bignoniaceae). PLoS ONE. 2014;9: e102607.
    Stewart AB, Sritongchuay T, Teartisup P, Kaewsomboon S, Bumrungsri S. Habitat and landscape factors influence pollinators in a tropical megacity, Bangkok. Thailand PeerJ. 2018;6: e5335.
    Stiles FG. Geographical aspects of bird-flower coevolution, with particular reference to Central America. Ann Missouri Bot Gard. 1981;68: 323–51.
    Stiles FG, Ayala AV, Girón M. Polinizacion de las flores de Brachyotum (Melastomataceae) por dos especies de Diglossa (Emberizidae). Caldasia. 1992;17: 47–54.
    Traveset A, Olesen JM, Nogales M, Vargas P, Jaramillo P, Antolín E, et al. Bird-flower visitation networks in the Galápagos unveil a widespread interaction release. Nat Commun. 2015;6: 6376.
    Tur C, Vigalondo B, Trøjelsgaard K, Olesen JM, Traveset A. Downscaling pollen-transport networks to the level of individuals. J Anim Ecol. 2014;83: 306–17.
    Valverde S, Piñero J, Corominas-Murtra B, Montoya J, Joppa L, Solé R. The architecture of mutualistic networks as an evolutionary spandrel. Nat Ecol Evol. 2018;2: 94–9.
    Villareal E. Estrategias de forrajeo y recursos florales utilizados, una explicación de la coexistencia de especies del género Diglossa (Familia: Thraupidae) en la Región Andina del Departamento de Nariño. Universidad de Nariño; 2014.
    Willcox BK, Howlett BG, Robson AJ, Cutting B, Evans L, Jesson L, et al. Evaluating the taxa that provide shared pollination services across multiple crops and regions. Sci Rep. 2019;9: 13538.
    Ye ZM, Jin XF, Wang QF, Yang CF, Inouye DW. Nectar replenishment maintains the neutral effects of nectar robbing on female reproductive success of Salvia przewalskii (Lamiaceae), a plant pollinated and robbed by bumble bees. Ann Bot. 2017;119: 1053–9.
    Zhang YW, Yu Q, Zhao JM, Guo YH. Differential effects of nectar robbing by the same bumble-bee species on three sympatric Corydalis species with varied mating systems. Ann Bot. 2009;104: 33–9.
    Zhu XF, Wan JP, Li QJ. Nectar robbers pollinate flowers with sexual organs hidden within corollas in distylous Primula secundiflora (Primulaceae). Biol Lett. 2010;6: 785–7.
  • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. Lu Wang, Fangqing Liu, Lan Zhao, et al. A test of genetic divergence of a bird existing in the Sichuan Basin and its surrounding mountain ranges. Avian Research, 2023. DOI:10.1016/j.avrs.2023.100144
    2. Wei Wang, Donghui Fang, Yi Shi, et al. Genome-wide SNP analysis reveals the selection signatures of two indigenous buffalo breeds in Sichuan. Conservation Genetics Resources, 2022, 14(3): 299. DOI:10.1007/s12686-022-01275-2
    3. Ningxin Gu, Guoling Chen, Jia Yang, et al. Novel microsatellite markers reveal low genetic diversity and evidence of heterospecific introgression in the critically endangered Chinese Crested Tern (Thalasseus bernsteini). Global Ecology and Conservation, 2021, 28: e01629. DOI:10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01629
    4. Guoling Chen, Chenqing Zheng, Nelson Wan, et al. Low genetic diversity in captive populations of the critically endangered Blue-crowned Laughingthrush (Garrulax courtoisi) revealed by a panel of novel microsatellites. PeerJ, 2019, 7: e6643. DOI:10.7717/peerj.6643

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Figures(4)  /  Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (944) PDF downloads (7) Cited by(4)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return