Swetlana G. Meshcheryagina, Alexey Opaev. 2021: Previously unknown behavior in parasitic cuckoo females: male-like vocalization during migratory activity. Avian Research, 12(1): 10. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-021-00246-9
Citation: Swetlana G. Meshcheryagina, Alexey Opaev. 2021: Previously unknown behavior in parasitic cuckoo females: male-like vocalization during migratory activity. Avian Research, 12(1): 10. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-021-00246-9

Previously unknown behavior in parasitic cuckoo females: male-like vocalization during migratory activity

Funds: 

This study was performed within the frameworks of state contract with the Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences 18-9-4-22

as a part of Program of the Russian Academy of Sciences 2013-2020 AAAA-A18-118042690110-1[0109-2019-0003]

'Ecological and evolutionary aspects of animal behavior and communication'.Call analysis was supported by the Russian Science Foundation 20-14-00058

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Swetlana G. Meshcheryagina, meshcheryagina_sg@ipae.uran.ru

  • Received Date: 23 Sep 2020
  • Accepted Date: 23 Feb 2021
  • Available Online: 24 Apr 2022
  • Publish Date: 05 Mar 2021
  • Background 

    In the last decade, enigmatic male-like cuckoo calls have been reported several times in East Asia. These calls exhibited a combination of vocal traits of both Oriental Cuckoo (Cuculus optatus) and Common Cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) advertising calls, and some authors therefore suggested that the enigmatic calls were produced by either Common × Oriental Cuckoo male hybrids or Common Cuckoo males having a gene mutation. However, the exact identity of calling birds are still unknown.

    Methods 

    We recorded previously unknown male-like calls from three captive Oriental Cuckoo females, and compared these calls with enigmatic vocalizations recorded in the wild as well as with advertising vocalizations of Common and Oriental Cuckoo males. To achieve this, we measured calls automatically. Besides, we video-recorded captive female emitting male-like calls, and compared these recordings with the YouTube recordings of calling males of both Common and Oriental Cuckoos to get insight into the mechanism of call production.

    Results 

    The analysis showed that female male-like calls recorded in captivity were similar to enigmatic calls recorded in the wild. Therefore, Oriental Cuckoo females might produce the latter calls. Two features of these female calls appeared to be unusual among birds. First, females produced male-like calls at the time of spring and autumn migratory activity and on migration in the wild. Because of this, functional significance of this call remained puzzling. Secondly, the male-like female call unexpectedly combined features of both closed-mouth (closed beak and simultaneous inflation of the 'throat sac') and open-mouth (prominent harmonic spectrum and the maximum neck extension observed at the beginning of a sound) vocal behaviors.

    Conclusions 

    The Cuculus vocalizations outside the reproductive season remain poorly understood. Here, we found for the first time that Oriental Cuckoo females can produce male-like calls in that time. Because of its rarity, this call might be an atavism. Indeed, female male-like vocalizations are still known in non-parasitic tropical and apparently more basal cuckoos only. Therefore, our findings may shed light on the evolution of vocal communication in avian brood parasites.

  • The Oriental White Stork (Ciconia boyciana) is a large and endangered waterbird, extensively found in East Asian countries. As a result of hunting, environmental pollution, habitat fragmentation and other causes, its breeding area is constantly shrinking. In the 1970s, wild breeding populations were extinct in Japan and in both South Korea and North Korea (Collar et al., 2001). In recent years, breeding pairs have been found in succession in the lower and middle Yangtze River floodplain and the Yellow River Delta (Yang et al., 2007; Xue et al., 2010) and their breeding area is expanding southward. In breeding and wintering areas of Russia and China, population protection and habitat restoration are underway, while in the historic breeding areas of South Korea and Japan, reintroduction plans are in progress. Research on conservation genetics of the population is very urgent.

    At present, research on conservation genetics of the Oriental White Stork is not thorough enough and is confined to preliminary research using mitochondrial markers (Murata et al., 2004; Zan et al., 2008a, 2008b). Therefore, more approaches to molecular markers are required. Use of microsatellite markers, characterized by extensive distribution, dominant inheritance, high morphism and their capacity in detecting slight variations, is an extremely valuable approach to study the genetic background of this population (Tauta, 1989; Zane et al., 2002). The screening of microsatellite primers which has been applied to the Wood Stork (Mycteria americana) can also be used with microsatellite markers in research on genetic diversity of the Oriental White Stork (Zhang et al., 2010). However, only two loci can be screened with this method and one pair shows moderate polymorphism, thus restricting research on the genetic structure of this bird. In this study, the conservatism of the flanking sequence of a microsatellite locus was brought into use and a cross-species amplification method was employed in the screening of microsatellite markers of the Oriental White Stork. These microsatellite markers will be very useful for studies of population genetics and genetic conservation.

    A total of 23 samples of Oriental White Stork were collected, of which 22 were from wild birds and one from a captive-bred bird (from Hefei Wildlife Park, with parental generation from the Chinese Alligator Nature Reserve of Anhui). Four feather samples were contour feathers of fledglings, three muscle samples were taken from dead birds and sixteen blood samples were taken from wing veins (Table 1). These samples were preserved with dehydrated alcohol (99%) and placed in a refrigerator at a temperature of –20℃.

    Table  1.  Samples for microsatellite analysis of Oriental White Storks
    Collection site Sampling time Number Source description
    Xuzhou Zoo 2006 5 Tongshan (blood samples)
    Jinan Zoo 2006 2 Breeding individuals from the Yellow River Delta N.N.R. in Dongying, Shandong Province (blood samples)
    Shenjin Lake National Nature Reserve (N.N.R.) 2006 1 Shengjin Lake (blood samples)
    Nanjing Hongshan Forest Zoo 2006 2 Shengjin Lake N.N.R. (blood samples)
    Hefei Wildlife Park 2010 2 Tianchang City (1 muscle sample), Hefei City (1 muscle sample)
    Yellow River Delta N.N.R. 2010–2011 10 Breeding individuals from the Yellow River Delta N.N.R. (6 blood samples, 4 feather samples)
    Yancheng N.N.R. 2010 1 Breeding individuals from Yancheng N.N.R., Jiangsu Province (muscle samples)
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The feather roots with pulp from the fledglings were cut into pieces after being washed with double distilled water; 0.2 g of muscles or 5 μL of blood were taken. The samples were then placed in a 2 mL centrifuge tube and 500 μL of the following solution was added: 10 mmol·L–1 Tris-HCl, 100 mmol·L–1 EDTA, 150 mmol·L–1 NaCl and 0.8% SDS, followed by the addition of K 40 μg·mL–1 proteases. Genomic DNA was extracted using the classical phenol-chloroform extraction method (Sambrook et al., 1989). The products obtained were supplemented with 50 μL of TE (pH 8.0) and cryopreserved at –20℃ after electrophoresis with a 1% agarose-Ethidium Bromide (EB) gel.

    We synthesized 36 pairs of microsatellite primers, of which 7 pairs came from Ciconia ciconia (Shephard et al., 2009), 12 pairs from Nipponia nippon (He et al., 2005) and 17 pairs from Ardea herodias (McGuire and Noor, 2002). The synthesis of all the primer pairs was entrusted to the Shanghai Bioengineering Co., Ltd.

    The gross volume of the PCR was 25 μL. The reaction system used was as follows: 100 ng of a DNA template, 0.4 μmol·L–1 per primer, 1.5 mmol·L–1 MgCl2, 0.2 mmol·L–1 dNTP and 0.8 U Taq enzyme. The PCR proceeded on an Eppendorf thermal cycler. The settings of the reaction cycle were as follows: the products were pre-degenerated at 95℃ for 15 min, de-natured at 94℃ for 30 s, annealed at 54–58℃ for 90 s, extended at 72℃ for 60 s and after 40 cycles, the products were extended at 72℃ for 10 min. The reaction was terminated at 4℃. The PCR products were detected by 1% agarose-EB gel electrophoresis. In this way, effective SSR primer pairs were selected.

    Primers with stable reaction results were synthesized into fluorescence primers marked with FAM, HEX and TAMRA which were then subjected to another PCR. The genotyping of reaction products was carried out by the BGI Life Tech Co., Ltd.

    Interpretation of microsatellite data after genotyping was performed using GeneMarker1.85 software and the data were integrated in an Excel table. Format transformation was conducted using the Excel Microsatellite Toolkit 3.1.1 software (http://animalgenomics.ucd.ie/sdepark/ms-toolkit/). The number of alleles (Na), polymorphism information content (PIC), expected heterozygosity (He) and observed heterozygosity (Ho) of each locus were obtained and the mean number of alleles (MNA), average apparent heterozygosity (Hobs) and the degree of unbiased genetic diversity (Hexp) of each locus were calculated. The probability (p value) of each locus was calculated using GENEPOP version 3.4 (Raymond and Rousset, 2000), in order to check if each locus satisfied the Hardy-Weinberg balance.

    The results of PCR amplification of 36 pairs of microsatellite primers on DNA of 23 samples showed that 12 pairs of primers did not have amplification products, of which 5 pairs of primers came from C. ciconia and 6 pairs from A. herodias. Stable products could be amplified from the remaining 24 pairs of primers. Random sampling was conducted and PCR repeated tests were performed using the 24 pairs of primers. After the typing results were interpreted, 11 pairs of polymorphism microsatellite primers were screened (Table 2). Among these 11 pairs, 5 pairs were from C. ciconia and 6 pairs from A. herodias.

    Table  2.  Primer information of 11 microsatellite loci
    Locus Primer sequences (5′–3′) Repeat motif Ta (℃)
    Cc01 F: TTCTTGCATTTGCTCCAGTG
    R: CACAAACATCAGCAAGGACAG
    (TTCT)16* 54
    Cc02 F: CGCTCGCTGTCTTTATCTCC
    R: CTGCTGCATGCCAGTTGAT
    (AC)3 + (AC)3 + (AC)10 57
    Cc05 F: GGAGGAATTTCAGCAATGGA
    R: TGGGAAACCAGGAAACTGTC
    (CA)9* 54
    Cc06 F: CTCGCTGTCTCCTCTGCTCT
    R: GAACAGCAATATCGCATCTACA
    (TG)13 53
    Cc07 F: GCATGAAAATGCATAGAGCAGA
    R: CCACCGTTATGATCCTTTGG
    (AAAG)10 57
    Ah208 F: GCTAATAACACCCAGTGTGGACC
    R: GACCCTGTACATACACTTCTAAAACCC
    (CA)10 58
    Ah209 F: GAAACACATCAGTGCAAGAGCAG
    R: AGTTAAGGAACAAATGTTTGGAAGGAATG
    (AC)16 58
    Ah210 F: ACGGGAACGTTTCAAAAATTTAAGATGTG
    R: ACGTTTCTATGGCTCAGAAACTGG
    (CA)11 58
    Ah211 F: GCTCATCAGGAGTTGAATCTGGC
    R: TCTGTCATTCAGCAATGGACC
    (CA)13 56
    Ah341 F: GGTAATGATTCTGATTTACCACTGAGGG
    R: ATGTGTTATCATATCTGGTCTTCACAGC
    (AC)12 58
    Ah343 F: CATTGCTTAACTTCTGAAGAAAC
    R: CTTGACCCAGCATTTGTGAATAAAACTG
    (AC)17 58
    Notes: "*" represents an interruption of this repeating unit by one nucleotide, while "+" in the repeating unit represents the linking of two repeating units by several random nucleotides. Ta means annealing temperature.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    From 11 microsatellite loci a total of 79 alleles were detected in the Oriental White Stork (Table 3). Of these, a maximum of 11 alleles were detected at locus Ah343, while a minimum of 3 alleles was detected at loci Ah210 and Ah 211. All 11 loci were polymorphic (PIC > 0.5), with the lowest mean polymorphism information of 0.5556. Expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.6376 (Cc07) to 0.8848 (Ah341), while the observed heterozygosity ranged from 0.2000 (Cc02) to 0.9474 (Ah341). At locus Ah341, the expected heterozygosity was 0.8848, the observed heterozygosity 0.9474 and the polymorphism information 0.8467; each of these was a maximum value. Loci with p values larger than 0.05 were Cc01, Cc05, Cc06, Ah208, Ah211 and Ah341, all of which were balanced. The only locus with a p value smaller than 0.05 but larger than 0.01 was the unbalanced Cc07. Loci Cc02, Ah209, Ah210 and Ah343 with p values smaller than 0.01, were extremely unbalanced.

    Table  3.  Genetic indices of 11 microsatellite loci of Oriental White Stork populations
    Locus Allele size range (bp) Na He Ho PIC p
    Cc01 167–205 8 0.8148 0.9286 0.7588 0.1237
    Cc02 146–156 5 0.7789 0.2000 0.6918 0.0003
    Cc05 152–212 10 0.8369 0.8462 0.7810 0.6573
    Cc06 182–210 8 0.8115 0.7000 0.7648 0.0790
    Cc07 201–207 4 0.6376 0.3571 0.5556 0.0103
    Ah208 116–158 8 0.8734 0.9412 0.8307 0.0963
    Ah209 145–181 10 0.7678 0.8667 0.7062 0.0000
    Ah210 122–150 3 0.6690 0.7333 0.5724 0.0002
    Ah 211 94–114 3 0.6578 0.8235 0.5629 0.1254
    Ah341 178–204 9 0.8848 0.9474 0.8467 0.3442
    Ah343 137–183 11 0.8651 0.7143 0.8185 0.0041
    All 7.1818 0.7816 0.7325 0.7172
    Na, the number of alleles, refers to the number of alleles of each locus; He, expected heterozygosity; Ho, observation heterozygosity; PIC, polymorphism information content; p, probabilities of Hardy-Weinberg balance tests, representing Hardy-Weinberg balance conditions; p < 0.05 indicates a significant deviation from the Hardy-Weinberg balance condition.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    From the data analysis of genotyping 23 Oriental White Storks we arrived at the following results about diversity: the mean number of alleles (MNA) of the population was 7.09 ± 3.02; Hobs was 0.7326 ± 0.0341; Hexp was 0.7816 ± 0.0270; PIC was 0.7172.

    The flanking sequence of the two ends of the microsatellites suggests relatively excellent conservatism in the case of close genetic relationships between species, making the acquisition of microsatellite loci through cross-species amplification possible. The closer the genetic relationship, the greater the probability to acquire microsatellite loci, else the lower the success rate of cross-species amplification (Primmer et al., 1996, 2005; Barbar et al., 2007). Compared with other methods for screening microsatellite primers, cross-species amplification is charaterized by convenience, speed and stable amplification of targeted DNA and can be developed and applied rapidly. One pair of primers with 35 microsatellite loci was designed by selecting one EST microsatellite sequence and a two-end flanking sequence of Zebra Finch (Taeniopygia guttata) homologous with Domestic Chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Among the 35 loci, 33 are suitable for research on 17 species of passerine birds, while 99% of the microsatellite loci are suitable for research on five species of non-passerine birds. The genotyping results of four birds of each species showed that microsatellite loci registered polymorphism in 24–76% (average 48%) of passerine birds, while the polymorphism was greatly reduced in non-passerine birds, at only 18–26% (average 21%) (Dawson et al., 2010). Thirty-six pairs of microsatellite primers from N. nippon, A. herodias and C. ciconia were used in the PCR of a DNA template extracted from Oriental White Storks, of which 24 pairs could amplify clear products and 11 pairs showed polymorphism, with a success rate of 30.6%. Of these, five pairs were from C. ciconia with a success rate of 71.4% and six pairs from A. herodias with a success rate of 35.3%. N. nippon did not show any polymorphism. Before the 1990s, the Oriental White Stork was recognized as a subspecies of C. ciconia, but it is now an independent species (Kyoko, l991). Throughout our study, we realized that the closer the genetic relationship in the cross-species amplification using microsatellite, the higher the success rate of the acquisition of microsatellite loci.

    For the Hardy-Weinberg balance to be satisfied, the population must be an ideal population (no immigration and emigration of individuals; random mating). In the analysis of genetic diversity of the population, the genotype distribution of microsatellite loci is generally checked to see if it complies with the requirements of the Hardy-Weinberg balance. Eleven pairs of microsatellite markers, screened with Oriental White Storks, were used to perform the Hardy-Weinberg balance check on 23 birds. Locus Cc07 deviated significantly from the Hardy-Weinberg balance. Loci Cc02, Ah209, Ah210 and Ah343 also deviated significantly from the Hardy-Weinberg balance. Small populations, inbreeding, mutation of alleles, null alleles and migration were important factors leading to the deviation from the Hardy-Weinberg balance (Hartl and Clark, 1997).

    MNA, Ho and He were the three major indices for the measurement of genetic diversity of the population and they typified the degree of mutation of the genetic structure. MNA was susceptible to sample size (Maudet et al., 2002). The average MNA was 7.09 ± 3.02, the average Hexp 0.7816 ± 0.0270 and the average Hobs 0.7326 ± 0.0341, suggesting relatively low genetic consistency, high heterozygosity and profound genetic diversity. These indices indicate that the population, up till now, possessed relatively high evolutionary potential.

    Botstein et al. (1980) were of the opinion that when the polymorphism information content (PIC) of the gene locus > 0.5, it is a gene locus with high polymorphism; with PIC between 0.25 and 0.5, the gene locus has moderate polymorphism and when PIC < 0.25, polymorphism is low. The lowest PIC of a gene locus was 0.5556 in our study and all 11 gene loci were highly polymorphic. The PIC of Oriental White Storks was 0.7172, suggesting high genetic diversity.

    Although for reasons such as habitat fragmentation and low reproductive rate the Oriental White Stork was believed to be an endangered species, our study shows that this species is still able to maintain a high level of genetic diversity, compared with other endangered or vulnerable birds such as the Nipponia nippon (PIC = 0.3230) and the Otis tarda dybowskii (PIC = 0.5497) (Tian et al., 2006; He and Fang, 2007). Gene flow in the population might contribute to high genetic diversity in the Oriental White Stork. Some birds of the Chinese population had migrated to Japan and historically, genetic exchanges may have occurred between the Chinese and Japanese populations (Zan et al., 2008a). In addition, progress in protection measures, such as reducing human disturbance and habitat restoration, may have resulted in a slight increase in the population and a gradual expansion of the breeding region may have been able to maintain the stability of the breeding population and its high level of genetic diversity (Marcia et al., 2005).

    Eleven pairs of Oriental White Stork microsatellite primers were screened in this study, which provides an effective tool for the analysis of genetic mutation and genetic structure of the Oriental White Stork at the level of nuclear genes. The size of our sample of Oriental White Storks was relatively small in relation to the number of microsatellite markers suitable for testing large samples, which might reduce the accuracy of data analysis for genotyping. The sample size needs to be expanded and more microsatellite markers should be screened in future studies, which will enable a more thorough analysis of genetic diversity of the Oriental White Stork population.

    We would like to extend our sincere thanks to Weiwei Xue, a graduate student in our research group, Liu Bin from the Jiangsu Dafeng National Nature Reserve for Milu Deer, Hao Jiang, Director of Hefei Wildlife Park, Mr. Shuyu Zhu and Yueliang Liu, chief engineer of the Yellow River Delta National Nature Reserve in Dongying, Shandong Province for their help with the sample collection. We also thank Dr. Baowei Zhang for his help in data analysis. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 3087317) and the Anhui Academic and Technical Reserve Candidate Leaders Fund.

  • Araya-Salas M, Smith-Vidaurre G. warbleR: an R package to streamline analysis of animal acoustic signals. Methods Ecol Evol. 2017;8: 184–91.
    Benedetti Y, Slezak K, Møller AP, Morelli F, Tryjanowski P. Number of syllables in cuckoo Cuculus canorus calls: a test using a citizen science project. Sci Rep. 2018;8: 12872.
    Boeme IR, Goretskaia MY. Female song in Passeriformes: an exception or the rule? Zh Obshch Biol. 2016;77: 239–46 (in Russian).
    Brumm H, Goymann W. On the natural history of duetting in white-browed Coucals: sex-and body-size-dependent differences in a collective vocal display. J Ornithol. 2017;158: 669–78.
    Cadena CD, López-Lanús B, Bates JM, Krabbe N, Rice NH, Stiles FG, et al. A rare case of interspecific hybridization in the tracheophone suboscines: Chestnut-naped Antpitta Grallaria nuchalis × Chestnut-crowned Antpitta G. ruficapilla in a fragmented Andean landscape. Ibis. 2007;149: 814–25.
    Catchpole CK, Slater PJB. Bird song: biological themes and variations. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
    Cramp S. Handbook or the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. In: The birds of the Western Palearctic, vol 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1985.
    Dantzker MS. Acoustic communication in the Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) an examination into vocal sacs, sound propagation, and signal directionality. Doctoral Thesis. San Diego: University of California; 2015.
    Davies NB. Cuckoo: cheating by nature. London: Bloomsbury Publ; 2015.
    Deng Z, Lloyd H, Xia C, Li D, Zhang Y. Within-season decline in call consistency of individual male Common Cuckoos (Cuculus canorus). J Ornithol. 2019a;160: 317–27.
    Deng Z, Lloyd H, Xia C, Møller AP, Liang W, Zhang Y. Components of variation in female Common Cuckoo calls. Behav Process. 2019b;158: 106–12.
    Erritzøe J, Mann CF, Brammer F, Fuller RA. Cuckoos of the World. London: Christopher Helm; 2012.
    Fletcher NH, Riede T, Beckers GJL, Suthers RA. Vocal tract filtering and the "coo" of doves. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004;116: 3750–6.
    Fuisz TI, De Kort SR. Habitat-dependent call divergence in the Common Cuckoo: is it a potential signal for assortative mating? Proc R Soc B. 2007;274: 2093–7.
    Garamszegi LZ, Pavlova DZ, Eens M, Møller AP. The evolution of song in female birds in Europe. Behav Ecol. 2007;18: 86–96.
    Gluschenko YuN, Korobov DV. Hybrids of the birds from Primorye territory. In: Kolyada AS, editor. Animal and plant world of the Far East, vol. 27. Vladivostok: Far Eastern Federal University; 2016. pp. 19–27 (in Russian). . Accessed 26 Jan 2019.
    Gluschenko YuN, Nechaev VA, Red'kin YA. Birds of Primorsky Krai: brief review of the fauna. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press; 2016. (in Russian).
    Graves GR. Diagnosis of a hybrid antbird (Phlegopsis nigromaculata × Phlegopsis erythroptera) and the rarity of hybridization among Suboscines. Proc Biol Soc Washington. 1992;105: 834–40.
    Hatzinger R, Hornik K, Nagel H, Maier MJ. R: Einführung durch angewandte Statistik. 2nd ed. München: Pearson Studium; 2014.
    Honza M, Taborsky B, Taborsky M, Teuschl Y, Vogl W, Moksnes A, et al. Behaviour of female Common Cuckoos, Cuculus canorus, in the vicinity of host nests before and during egg laying: a radiotelemetry study. Anim Behav. 2002;64: 861–8.
    Jung WJ, Lee JW, Yoo JC. 'cu-coo': can you recognize my stepparents?—a study of host-specific male call divergence in the Common Cuckoo. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9: e90468.
    Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika. 1974;39: 31–6.
    Kassambara A, Mundt F. Factorextra: extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses. R package version 1.0.5. 2017. . Accessed 15 Jan 2019.
    Kim H, Lee JW, Yoo JC. Comparing vocal structures of the parasitic and nonparasitic groups in Cuculinae. Avian Res. 2017a;8: 27.
    Kim H, Lee JW, Yoo JC. Characteristics of female calls of four Cuculus species breeding in Korea. Korean J Ornithol. 2017b;24: 41–7 (in Korean, abstract in English).
    King B. The taxonomic status of the three subspecies of Cuculus saturatus. Bull BOC. 2005;125: 48–55.
    La Touche JDD. A handbook of the birds of Eastern China, vol. II. London: Taylor and Francis; 1931–1934.
    Lack D. Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. London: Methuen; 1968.
    Lastukhin AA. Zapis' neobychnoj pesni kukushki iz Yuzhnogo Primor'ya (The recording of unusual cuckoo song from South Primorye). Russian J Ornithol. 2015;24: 3472–3 (in Russian).
    Lee JW, Kim HN, Yoo S, Yoo JC. Common cuckoo females may escape male sexual harassment by color polymorphism. Sci Rep. 2019;9: 7515.
    Li Y, Xia C, Lloyd H, Li D, Zhang Y. Identification of vocal individuality in male cuckoos using different analytical techniques. Avian Res. 2017;8: 21.
    Lindholm A, Linden A. Some notes on the distribution and songs of two Oriental Cuckoo taxa, Cuculus (saturatus) saturatus and Cuculus (saturatus) optatus. Forktail. 2007;23: 12–6.
    Lyon BE, Gilbert GS. Rarely parasitized and unparasitized species mob and alarm call to cuckoos: implications for sparrowhawk mimicry by brood parasitic cuckoos. Wilson J Ornithol. 2013;125: 627–30.
    Maier MJ. Companion package to the Book 'R: Einfuhrung durch angewandte Statistik'. R package version 0.9.3. 2015. . Accessed 15 Jan 2019.
    Marova IM, Antipov VA, Ivanitskii VV. Population and geographic variation in avian song. In: Kalyakin MV, Belousova AV, editors. Archives of the Menzbier Ornithological Society, vol. 3. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press; 2017. p. 121–37 (in Russian).
    Marton A, Fülöp A, Ozogány K, Moskát C, Bán M. Host alarm calls attract the unwanted attention of the brood parasitic Common Cuckoo. Sci Rep. 2019;9: 18563.
    McCarthy EM. Handbook of avian hybrids of the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
    Møller AP, Morelli F, Mousseau TA, Tryjanowski P. The number of syllables in Chernobyl cuckoo calls reliably indicate habitat, soil and radiation levels. Ecol Indic. 2016;66: 592–7.
    Moores N. Selected records from Socheong Island. South Korea Forktail. 2007;23: 102–24.
    Moores N. Going Cuckoo. In: Birds Korea. Scientific electronic publication. 2013. Accessed 20 Jan 2016.
    Moores N. "Barking Cuckoo": a short update. In: Birds Korea. Scientific electronic publication. 2015. . Accessed 30 Oct 2020.
    Moskát C, Hauber ME. Sex-specific responses to simulated territorial intrusions in the Common Cuckoo: a dual function of female acoustic signaling. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2019;73: 60.
    Moskát C, Elek Z, Bán M, Geltsch N, Hauber ME. Can common cuckoos discriminate between neighbors and strangers by their calls? Anim Behav. 2017;126: 253–60.
    Moskát C, Hauber ME, Bán M, Fülöp A, Geltsch N, Marton A, Elek Z. Are both notes of the Common Cuckoo's call necessary for familiarity recognition? Behav Process. 2018;157: 685–90.
    Moskát C, Bán M, Fülöp A, Bereczki J, Hauber ME. Bimodal habitat use in brood parasitic Common Cuckoos (Cuculus canorus) revealed by GPS telemetry. Auk. 2019;136: 019.
    Moskát C, Taylor DM, Hauber ME. Effective conspecific communication with aberrant calls in the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2021;75: 7.
    Nakamura H, Miyazawa Y. Movements, space use and social organization of radio-tracked Common Cuckoos during the breeding season in Japan. Jap J Ornithol. 1997;46: 23–54.
    Nakamura H, Miyazawa Y, Kashiwagi K. Behavior of radio-tracked Common Cuckoo females during the breeding season in Japan. Ornithol Sci. 2005;4: 31–41.
    Odom KJ, Hall ML, Riebel K, Omland KE, Langmore NE. Female song is widespread and ancestral in songbirds. Nat Commun. 2014;5: 3379.
    Opaev AS, Shishkina EM. Song amplitude and population density in two sympatric warblers Phylloscopus schwarzi and P. fuscatus. Bioacoustics. 2020. .
    Panov EN. The birds of South Ussuriland: (fauna, biology, behaviour). Novosibirsk: Nauka Siberian Branch; 1973. (in Russian).
    Payne RB. Behavior and songs of hybrid parasitic finches. Auk. 1980;97: 118–34.
    Payne RB. The Cuckoos. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
    Reichard DG, Welkin JF. On the existence and potential functions of low-amplitude vocalizations in North American birds. Auk. 2015;132: 156–66.
    Riede T, Beckers GJL, Blevins W, Suthers RA. Inflation of the esophagus and vocal tract filtering in ring dove. J Exp Biol. 2004;207: 4025–36.
    Riede T, Forstmeier W, Kempenaers B, Goller F. The functional morphology of male courtship display in the Pectoral Sandpiper (Calidris melanotos). Auk. 2015;132: 65–77.
    Riede T, Eliason CM, Miller EH, Goller F, Clarke JA. Coos, booms, and hoots: the evolution of closed-mouth vocal behaviour in birds. Evolution. 2016;70: 1734–46.
    Tobias JA, Sheard C, Seddon N, Meade A, Cotton AJ, Nakagawa S. Territoriality, social bonds, and the evolution of communal signaling in birds. Front Ecol Evol. 2016;4: 74.
    Tryjanowski P, Morelli F, Osiejuk TS, Møller AP. Functional significance of cuckoo Cuculus canorus calls: responses of conspecifics, hosts and non-hosts. PeerJ. 2018;6: e5302.
    Vogl W, Taborsky B, Taborsky M, Teuschl Y, Honza M. Habitat and space use of European cuckoo females during the egg laying period. Behaviour. 2004;141: 881–98.
    Wei C, Jia C, Dong L, Wang D, Xia C, Zhang Y, Liang W. Geographic variation in the calls of the Common Cuckoo (Cuculus canorus): isolation by distance and divergence among subspecies. J Ornithol. 2015;156: 533–42.
    Welbergen JA, Davies NB. Reed warblers discriminate cuckoos from sparrowhawks with graded alarm signals that attract mates and neighbours. Anim Behav. 2008;76: 811–22.
    Wild JM, Goller F, Suthers RA. Inspiratory muscle activity during bird song. J Neurobiol. 1998;36: 441–53.
    Williams HM, Willemoes M, Klaassen RHG, Strandberg R, Thorup K. Common Cuckoo home ranges are larger in the breeding season than in the non-breeding season and in regions of sparse forest cover. J Ornithol. 2016;157: 461–9.
    Xia C, Liang W, Carey GJ, Zhang Y. Song characteristics of Oriental Cuckoo Cuculus optatus and Himalayan Cuckoo Cuculus saturatus and implications for distribution and taxonomy. Zool Stud. 2016;55: 38.
    Xia C, Deng Z, Lloyd H, Møller AP, Zhao X, Zhang Y. The function of three main call types in common cuckoo. Ethology. 2019;125: 652–9.
    York JE, Davies NB. Female cuckoo calls misdirect host defenses towards the wrong enemy. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017;1: 1520–5.
    Yu J, Lv W, Xu H, Bibi N, Yu Y, Jiang Y, et al. Function of note strings in Japanese Tit alarm calls to the Common Cuckoo: a playback experiment. Avian Res. 2017a;8: 22.
    Yu J, Xing X, Jiang Y, Liang W, Wang H, Møller AP. Alarm call-based discrimination between Common Cuckoo and Eurasian sparrowhawk in a Chinese population of great tits. Ethology. 2017b;123: 542–50.
    Yu J, Lu H, Sun W, Liang W, Wang H, Møller AP. Heterospecific alarm-call recognition in two warbler hosts of Common Cuckoos. Anim Cogn. 2019;22: 1149–57.
    Yu J, Mingju E, Sun W, Liang W, Wang H, Møller AP. Differently sized cuckoos pose different threats to hosts. Curr Zool. 2020;66: 247–53.
    Yun S, Kim H, Moon HK, Lee JW, Yoo JC. Home range overlap and its genetic correlates in an avian brood parasite, the Lesser Cuckoo Cuculus poliocephalus. J Ethol. 2019;37: 271–81.
    Zsebök S, Moskát C, Bán M. Individually distinctive vocalization in Common Cuckoos (Cuculus canorus). J Ornithol. 2017;158: 213–22.
  • Related Articles

Catalog

    Figures(7)  /  Tables(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (608) PDF downloads (6) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return