Jeffery D. Sullivan, Paul R. Marbán, Jennifer M. Mullinax, David F. Brinker, Peter C. McGowan, Carl R. Callahan, Diann J. Prosser. 2020: Assessing nest attentiveness of Common Terns via video cameras and temperature loggers. Avian Research, 11(1): 22. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-020-00208-7
Citation: Jeffery D. Sullivan, Paul R. Marbán, Jennifer M. Mullinax, David F. Brinker, Peter C. McGowan, Carl R. Callahan, Diann J. Prosser. 2020: Assessing nest attentiveness of Common Terns via video cameras and temperature loggers. Avian Research, 11(1): 22. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-020-00208-7

Assessing nest attentiveness of Common Terns via video cameras and temperature loggers

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Diann J. Prosser, dprosser@usgs.gov

  • Received Date: 30 Mar 2020
  • Accepted Date: 03 Jul 2020
  • Available Online: 24 Apr 2022
  • Publish Date: 07 Jul 2020
  • Background 

    While nest attentiveness plays a critical role in the reproductive success of avian species, nest attentiveness data with high temporal resolution is not available for many species. However, improvements in both video monitoring and temperature logging devices present an opportunity to increase our understanding of this aspect of avian behavior.

    Methods 

    To investigate nest attentiveness behaviors and evaluate these technologies, we monitored 13 nests across two Common Tern (Sterna hirundo) breeding colonies with a paired video camera - temperature logger approach, while monitoring 63 additional nests with temperature loggers alone. Observations occurred from May to August of 2017 on Poplar (Chesapeake Bay, Maryland, USA) and Skimmer Islands (Isle of Wight Bay, Maryland, USA). We examined data respective to four times of day: Morning (civil dawn‒11:59), Peak (12:00‒16:00), Cooling (16:01‒civil dusk), and Night (civil dusk‒civil dawn).

    Results 

    While successful nests had mostly short duration off-bouts and maintained consistent nest attentiveness throughout the day, failed nests had dramatic reductions in nest attentiveness during the Cooling and Night periods (p < 0.05) with one colony experiencing repeated nocturnal abandonment due to predation pressure from a Great Horned Owl (Bubo virginianus). Incubation appeared to ameliorate ambient temperatures during Night, as nests were significantly warmer during Night when birds were on versus off the nest (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, off-bouts during the Peak period occurred during higher ambient temperatures, perhaps due to adults leaving the nest during the hottest periods to perform belly soaking. Unfortunately, temperature logger data alone had limited ability to predict nest attentiveness status during shorter bouts, with results highly dependent on time of day and bout duration. While our methods did not affect hatching success (p > 0.05), video-monitored nests did have significantly lower clutch sizes (p < 0.05).

    Conclusions 

    The paired use of iButtons and video cameras enabled a detailed description of the incubation behavior of COTE. However, while promising for future research, the logistical and potential biological complications involved in the use of these methods suggest that careful planning is needed before these devices are utilized to ensure data is collected in a safe and successful manner.

  • Adaptive variation in thermogenic capacity is critical to the survival of small birds in temperate zones (Schmidt-Nielsen 1997; Weathers 1997). To minimize the energetic cost of thermoregulation, birds use a variety of morphological and behavioral traits to adjust their rates of heat loss and heat gain, ranging from biochemical adjustments to changes in internal and whole organ mass (McKechnie 2008; Swanson 2010; Zheng et al. 2014a). Basal metabolic rate (BMR) refers to the energy expenditure of an animal at rest (i.e. thermoneutrality) during the inactive phase of the day, when it is not processing food, moulting, or reproducing (McNab 2009), and is one of the fundamental physiological standards for assessing the energetic cost of thermoregulation (McKechnie et al. 2006). BMR has been referred to as a fundamental energetic trait, in large part because it represents a fixed cost that all organisms must incur (Furness 2003). BMR can consume as much as 50-60 % of daily energy expenditure (DEE) and variation in BMR may be associated with peak, or sustained, metabolic rates, species richness and distribution, activity levels and life-history strategies (McKinney and McWilliams 2005; Wells and Schaeffer 2012). BMR is therefore an important parameter for both inter- and intraspecific comparisons of thermoregulatory ability (McKechnie et al. 2006; McNab 2009). To date, BMR has been measured in more than 500 species of birds (McKechnie 2008; McNab 2009; Smit and McKechnie 2010). Those studies show that BMR is highly flexible both between and within species (Wikelski et al. 2003; Wiersma et al. 2007; Zheng et al. 2014a). The typically lower BMR of tropical birds compared to that of their high-latitude counterparts has been explained as an adaptation to avoid heat stress and to conserve water (Wiersma et al. 2007). In turn, the higher BMR of temperate birds has been explained as a direct or indirect result of adaptation to a colder climate and a shorter breeding season, both of which would be expected to require a higher level of metabolic activity (Swanson 2010; Zheng et al. 2014b). It has been suggested that the BMR of birds that migrate to tropical latitudes in winter, but breed in colder, temperate latitudes in summer, is lower in winter than in summer (Lindström and Klaassen 2003; Zheng et al. 2013a).

    What are the metabolic mechanisms underlying variation in BMR? McKechnie (2008) and Swanson (2010) identified major physiological and morphological pathways whereby metabolic rates are up- or down-regulated, namely, adjustments in organ mass, adjustments in the mass-specific metabolic intensities of specific organs, and adjustments in the transport capacities for oxygen and metabolic substrates (Zheng et al. 2014b). At the organism level, the mechanism that has received the most attention has been the positive relationship between body mass (Mb) adjusted organ size and BMR (Daan et al. 1990; Chappell et al. 1999; Hammond et al. 2000). Although they represent less than 10 % of Mb, internal organs such as the liver, kidneys, heart and digestive tract can contribute more than 60 % of the energy expended at the basal level (Rolfe and Brown 1997; Clapham 2012). The liver is one of the largest and most metabolically active organs in endotherms, and, under basal metabolic conditions, may contribute 25 % of total heat production (Villarin et al. 2003; Zheng et al. 2008a). Skeletal muscles have lower, mass-specific, resting metabolic rates than many central organs (Scott and Evans 1992). However, due to their large total mass, they may contribute significantly to seasonal metabolic acclimatization (Chappell et al. 1999; Zheng et al. 2008b, 2014a). At the physiological and biochemical level, changes in activities of catabolic enzymes could influence the mass-specific metabolic intensities of organs, thereby affecting BMR (Liknes and Swanson 2011; Zheng et al. 2014a). Such variation in cellular metabolic intensity is often measured by examining variation in state-4 respiration (Zheng et al. 2008b, 2013a), citrate synthase (CS) activity (Swanson 2010; Swanson et al. 2014), or cytochrome coxidase (COX) activity. CS plays a key role in the Krebs cycle whereas state-4 respiration and COX are important in oxidative phosphorylation (Zheng et al. 2014a, b ). The adaptive changes that produce higher BMR in small birds are thought to have a cellular or molecular basis and levels of state-4 respiration and COX activity have been commonly used as enzymatic indicators of variation in BMR at the cellular level (Zheng et al. 2008b, 2014a; Zhou et al. 2016).

    Bramblings (Fringilla montifringilla), Little Buntings (Emberiza pusilla) and Eurasian Tree Sparrows (Passer montanus) inhabit vast areas of Europe and Asia (MacKinnon and Phillipps 2000). Bramblings and Little Buntings are migratory, wintering in southern Europe, northern India, and China, whereas Eurasian Tree Sparrows are resident in China. Bramblings and Little Buntings migrate to Wenzhou only during spring and autumn migration periods (Liu et al. 2001; Zheng et al. 2013a). The Brambling and Little Bunting have relatively higher body temperatures and metabolic rates than expected based on their body masses and broad thermal neutral zones, and relatively lower critical temperatures (Liu et al. 2001, 2004). The Eurasian Tree Sparrow increases its thermogenic capacity in cold conditions mainly by increasing both respiratory enzyme activity and the level of plasma thyroid hormones (Liu et al. 2008; Zheng et al. 2008a, 2014b). The capacity to make these metabolic adjustments may be the key for this species being able to survive in relatively cold areas (Liu et al. 2004, 2008). The present study is a continuation of investigation into the thermogenic capacities of these species. We hypothesized that species-specific physiological and biochemical metabolic characteristics would contribute to interspecific variation in BMR. We predicted that species with relatively high BMR would have higher organ mass, mitochondrial respiration capacity and COX activity. In this study we tested this hypothesis by comparing BMR, organ mass and selected biochemical markers of metabolic cellular activity, in these three species.

    Seven Bramblings and eight Little Buntings were live-trapped in forested parts of Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province (27°29′N, 120°51′E) in China during the spring migration period in 2011, and ten Eurasian Tree Sparrows were captured at the same time. The Wenzhou climate is warm-temperate with an average annual rainfall of 1700 mm spread across all months with slightly more precipitation during winter and spring. Mean daily maximum temperatures range from 39 ℃ in July to 8 ℃ in January (Zheng et al. 2008a, 2014a). Body mass (Mb) to the nearest 0.1 g was determined immediately upon capture with a Sartorius balance (model BT25S). Bramblings, buntings and sparrows were transported to the laboratory and caged for 1 or 2 d (50 cm × 30 cm × 20 cm) outdoors under natural photoperiod (about 14:10 hours light:dark photoperiod) and temperature (18 ℃) before measurements. Food and water were supplied ad libitum (Zhou et al. 2016). All experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China (Wu et al. 2015; Zhou et al. 2016).

    We measured oxygen consumption using an open-circuit respirometry system (S-3A/I, AEI technologies, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) (Zheng et al. 2014a). We provided a perch in respirometry chamber and allowed individual birds to rest in the 1.5-L metabolic chamber before measuring their metabolic rate (Smit and McKechnie 2010). The metabolic chamber was housed in a temperature-controlled cabinet capable of regulating temperature to ±0.5 ℃ (Artificial Climatic Engine BIC-300, Shanghai, China). H2O and CO2 were scrubbed from the air with a silica gel/soda lime/silica column before and after it passed through the metabolic chamber. We determined the fractional concentrations of oxygen in the inlet and outlet chamber air with an oxygen sensor (AEI technologies N-22M, USA). During the measurement of metabolic rates, we pumped dry CO2-free air through the chamber at 300 mL/min with a flow control system (AEI technologies R-1, USA) calibrated to ±1 % accuracy with a general purpose thermal mass flow-meter (TSI 4100 Series, USA), to maintain the fractional concentration of O2 in the chamber at about 20 % (McNab 2006). We obtained the baseline O2 concentration before and after each test (Li et al. 2010; Wu et al. 2015). We measured oxygen consumption rates at 30 ± 0.5 ℃, which is within the thermal neutral zone for Bramblings, Little Buntings and Eurasian Tree Sparrows (Zheng et al. 2008b, 2014b). We obtained all measurements of gas exchange during the rest-phase of birds' circadian cycles (between 20:00 and 04:00 hours) in dark chambers. We removed food 4 h before each test to create post-absorptive conditions. Measurement of oxygen consumption commenced when birds were observed perching calmly in the chamber and continued for 1 h. In general, each animal was in the metabolic chamber for at least 2 h. The oxygen consumption data were recorded every minute according to the equation 2 described by Hill (1972). We took the lowest 5 min mean oxygen consumption data over the test period to calculate BMR (Wu et al. 2015; Zhou et al. 2016). We expressed metabolic rates as mL O2/h after correcting all values to standard temperature, pressure, and dry gas (STPD) conditions (Schmidt-Nielsen 1997). We measured body temperature during metabolic measurements using a lubricated thermocouple inserted in the cloaca, and digitized the output using a thermocouple meter (Beijing Normal University Instruments Co.). We measured Mb to the nearest 0.1 g before and after the experiments, and used mean Mb in calculations. All measurements were taken daily between 20:00 and 04:00 hours.

    Birds were euthanized by cervical dislocation at the end of the experiment and their pectoral muscle, heart, liver, kidneys, gizzard, small intestine and rectum extracted and weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg. Part of the muscle and liver was used to investigate state-4 respiration and COX activity (Zheng et al. 2008b, 2014a), and the other internal organs, including the remainder of the muscle and liver, were dried to a constant mass over 2 days at 65 ℃, and weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg (Williams and Tieleman 2000; Liu and Li 2006; Wu et al. 2014).

    Liver and pectoral muscle sub-samples were placed in ice-cold, sucrose-buffered medium, cleaned of any adhering tissue, blotted, and weighed. We chopped liver samples coarsely with scissors, then rinsed and resuspended them in 5 volumes of ice-cold medium (Rasmussen et al. 2004). Pectoral muscle samples were coarsely chopped with scissors, and treated with proteinase for 5-10 min, after which the proteinase was removed and the muscle samples were resuspended in 10 volumes of ice-cold medium. Both liver and muscle preparations were homogenized with a Teflon/glass homogenizer. Homogenates were centrifuged at 600×g for 10 min at 4 ℃ in an Eppendorf centrifuge, and the pellets containing nuclei and cellular debris discarded. Supernatants were centrifuged at 12, 000×g for 10 min at 4 ℃. The resultant pellets were suspended, respun at 12, 000×g, and resuspended (2:1, w/v for liver and 4:1 for muscle) in ice-cold medium (Zheng et al. 2013b). We determined the protein content of mitochondria by the Folin phenol method with bovine serum albumin as standard (Lowry et al. 1951).

    Mitochondrial state-4 respiration in liver and pectoral muscle was measured at 30 ℃ in 1.96 mL of respiration medium with a Clark electrode (Hansatech Instruments LTD., England, DW-1), essentially as described by Estabrook (1967). State-4 respiration was measured over a 1 h period under substrate dependent conditions, with succinate as the substrate (Zheng et al. 2014a). State-4 respiration was expressed as mean mass-specific level [µmol O2/(min g tissue)] (Zheng et al. 2013a). Cytochrome c oxidase (COX) activity in the liver and pectoral muscle was measured polarographically at 30 ℃ using a Clark electrode according to Sundin et al. (1987). Enzyme activity was reported as mean mass-specific level [µmol O2/(min g tissue)] (Zheng et al. 2013b, 2014a).

    Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS package (version 12.0). All variables were tested for normality with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test before statistical tests were performed. Non-normal data were normalized by transforming them to their natural logarithms before conducting statistical tests. Mb among different groups was compared using a one-way ANOVA. The significance of differences in BMR and organ mass was determined with a one-way ANCOVA with Mb as a covariate. We used Tukey's HSD post hoc test to determine which species differed significantly from others. The statistical significance of differences in mitochondrial protein, mitochondrial state-4 respiration and COX activity in the liver and muscle was tested with a one-way ANOVA. Least-squares linear regression was used to evaluate the relationship between log BMR and log Mb, and between log BMR, log state-4 respiration and log COX. Data are reported as mean ± SE, unless otherwise noted. The p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

    There were significant differences in Mbs among the three species (F2, 22 = 21.303, p < 0.001; Fig. 1A; Table 1). There were also significant differences in BMR (mL O2/h) among the three species (F2, 22 = 26.772, p < 0.001; Fig. 1B); mean BMR was significantly higher in Eurasian Tree Sparrows than in Bramblings (19.0 %) and Little Buntings (74.4 %). Corrected for Mb, BMR still differed significantly among the three species (F2, 21 = 5.402, p < 0.05, Table 1). There was a positive correlation between Mb and BMR (r = 0.768, p < 0.001; Fig. 1C). No significant differences were found between the three species in body temperature (data not shown).

    Figure  1.  Comparison of Mb (A), basal metabolic rate (B) and the relationship between log Mb and log basal metabolic rate (C) among Bramblings (Fringilla montifringilla), Little Buntings (Emberiza pusilla) and Eurasian Tree Sparrows (Passer montanus). Data are shown as mean ± SE, bars with different letters are significantly different
    Table  1.  Comparison of the body mass, basal metabolic rate and internal organ dry mass among Bramblings (Fringilla montifringilla), Little Buntings (Emberiza pusilla) and Eurasian Tree Sparrows (Passer montanus)
    Fringilla montifringilla Emberiza pusilla Passer montanus Significance
    Sample size (n) 7 8 10
    Body mass (g) 18.2 ± 0.3b 14.9 ± 0.3a 18.6 ± 0.6b F2, 22 = 21.303, p < 0.001
    Basal metabolic rate [mL/(O2·h)] 71.63 ± 3.90a 63.36 ± 5.14a 84.28 ± 3.68b F2, 21 = 5.402, p < 0.05
    Muscle (mg) 394.0 ± 19.9 391.1 ± 26.3 435.2 ± 18.8 F2, 21 = 1.598, p > 0.05
    Heart (mg) 50.8 ± 4.1 45.2 ± 5.3 59.9 ± 3.8 F2, 21 = 2.569, p > 0.05
    Liver (mg) 187.1 ± 16.8 234.1 ± 22.2 223.1 ± 15.9 F2, 21 = 2.082, p > 0.05
    Kidney (mg) 36.3 ± 2.2 36.2 ± 2.9 37.9 ± 2.1 F2, 21 = 0.175, p > 0.05
    Gizzard (mg) 77.6 ± 8.4a 94.4 ± 11.0ab 120.5 ± 7.9b F2, 21 = 8.852, p < 0.01
    Small intestine (mg) 72.3 ± 5.0 65.4 ± 6.6 71.5 ± 4.7 F2, 21 = 0.284, p > 0.05
    Rectum (mg) 5.9 ± 0.3b 3.8 ± 0.4a 5.2 ± 0.3b F2, 21 = 5.815, p < 0.01
    Digestive tract (mg) 155.7 ± 7.9a 163.5 ± 10.5a 197.1 ± 7.5b F2, 21 = 21.358, p < 0.001
    Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANCOVA with body mass as a covariate. Data are presented as mean ± SE. The different superscripts in the same row indicate significant differences
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Gizzard mass differed significantly among the three species (F2, 21 = 8.852, p < 0.01; Table 1). The mean gizzard mass of Eurasian Tree Sparrows was heavier than that of Bramblings, but there was no significant difference in gizzard mass between Eurasian Tree Sparrows and Little Buntings, or between that of Little Buntings and Bramblings. The three species also differed significantly in rectal mass (F2, 21 = 5.815, p < 0.01; Table 1). Eurasian Tree Sparrows and Bramblings had a higher average rectal mass than Little Buntings, but there was no significant difference in rectal mass between Eurasian Tree Sparrows and Bramblings. Eurasian Tree Sparrows had a higher average total digestive tract mass than Bramblings and Little Buntings (F2, 21 = 21.358, p < 0.001), but there was no significant difference in this variable between the latter two species (p > 0.05). No significant between-species differences were apparent in the dry mass of the heart, liver, kidneys, small intestine, or muscle (Table 1). Partial correlations between log organ mass and log Mb were positive for all organs, and the dry mass of the heart, liver, kidneys, gizzard, total digestive tract, and muscle, were significantly correlated with Mb (Table 2). For each of these organs, the slopes of the respective regression lines exceeded 1.0, indicating that organ mass increased with body size at a faster rate than overall Mb (Table 2). BMR residuals were only significantly, positively correlated with the total digestive tract dry mass residuals (Table 2).

    Table  2.  Linear regression statistics for log dry organ mass versus log body mass (partial correlations) and log dry organ mass versus log BMR residuals among small birds in China
    Muscle Heart Liver Kidney Gizzard Small intestine Rectum Digestive tract
    Partial correlations
    R2 0.669 0.193 0.002 0.397 0.406 0.038 0.076 0.487
    p < 0.01 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.01 < 0.001 0.177 0.098 < 0.01
    Slope 1.292 0.898 0.070 1.030 1.720 0.408 0.635 1.226
    Residual correlations
    R2 0.008 0.020 0.019 0.043 0.058 0.056 0.020 0.169
    p 0.664 0.235 0.513 0.949 0.129 0.133 0.235 < 0.05
    Slope 0.050 0.253 0.143 0.010 0.381 0.267 0.269 0.336
    Values in italic indicate statistically significant results
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    There were no significant interspecific differences in the protein content of different organs (liver, F2, 22 = 1.007, p > 0.05; muscle, F2, 22 = 0.360, p > 0.05; Fig. 2A), but Eurasian Tree Sparrows had higher mitochondrial state-4 respiration (liver, F2, 22 = 4.374, p < 0.05; muscle, F2, 22 = 15.108, p < 0.001; Fig. 2B) and COX activity (liver, F2, 22 = 9.615, p < 0.01; muscle, F2, 22 = 8.492, p < 0.01; Fig. 2C) than Bramblings and Little Buntings. No significant differences were found in these variables between the latter two species (p > 0.05). Log BMR was positively correlated with log COX activity in the liver (r = 0.388, p < 0.05; Fig. 3b), log state-4 respiration (r = 0.568, p < 0.01; Fig. 3c) and log COX activity (r = 0.548, p < 0.01; Fig. 3d) in muscle.

    Figure  2.  Differences in mitochondrial protein (A), state-4 respiration (B), and cytochrome c oxidase (C) in the liver and pectoral muscle among Bramblings (Fringilla montifringilla), Little Buntings (Emberiza pusilla) and Eurasian Tree Sparrows (Passer montanus). Data are shown as mean ± SE, bars with different letters are significantly different
    Figure  3.  Correlations between log metabolic rate and state-4 respiration in the liver (a), and cytochrome c oxidase (COX) activity in the liver (b), state-4respiration in pectoral muscle (c) and cytochrome c oxidase (COX) activity in pectoral muscle (d), among Bramblings (Fringilla montifringilla), Little Buntings (Emberiza pusilla) and Eurasian Tree Sparrows (Passer montanus)

    The results of this study indicate significant differences in organ mass, and some biochemical markers of metabolic tissue activity, among the three species, which could partly account for the observed interspecific differences in BMR (Guderley et al. 2005).

    With respect to metabolic traits, the BMR of an animal is the sum of the metabolic rates of its organs and other metabolically active tissues (Zheng et al. 2008a; Swanson 2010; Clapham 2012). The selective pressures that influence metabolism may, however, be complex and act on metabolic rate through multiple avenues. Two of these potential avenues are to alter the sizes of tissues or organs and to alter the density of mitochondria and the concentration of enzymes in aerobic catabolic pathways (Brand et al. 2003; Else et al. 2004). However, it is not clear whether large, energetically expensive organs are responsible for higher BMR, or whether they are necessary to support a higher BMR. Thus, the relationship between BMR and organ mass remains purely correlative, which is cause and which is effect remains unresolved (Steyermark et al. 2005). What are the ecological and evolutionary implications of having larger visceral organs for higher BMR birds? It has been suggested that much of the energy used in basal metabolism is consumed by the visceral organs (Daan et al. 1990; Piersma et al. 1996). Williams and Tieleman (2000) hypothesized that natural selection adjusts the size of the internal organs to match energy requirements, and that body size independent variation in BMR reflects the relative size of internal organs. These include the digestive tract, which performs digestion and absorption, the heart, which transports oxygen to the tissues, the liver which performs catabolism, and the kidneys, which eliminate nitrogenous and other wastes (Kersten and Piersma 1987; Daan et al. 1990; Hammond et al. 2001). We found no significant interspecific differences in heart, liver, kidneys, or muscle mass, and consequently no evidence to support the hypothesis that the mass of these organs should be greater in species with higher BMR. However, compared to Bramblings and Little Buntings, Eurasian Tree Sparrows had a heavier gizzard, rectum and total digestive tract. These findings suggest that the mass of the digestive organs could be related to the observed between-species differences in BMR. The ecological implications of having a larger digestive tract are increased food consumption, which could, in turn, stimulate the enlargement of organs such as the gizzard and small intestine (Zheng et al. 2008b; Lv et al. 2014). For example, Zheng et al. (2013b) acclimated Chinese Bulbuls (Pycnonotus sinensis) to either 10 or 30 ℃ for 4 weeks, measured their BMR, and then determined the dry mass of their internal organs. Bulbuls acclimated to 10 ℃ had a significantly higher BMR, and a markedly larger liver and intestine than those acclimated to 30 ℃. Eurasian Tree Sparrows also had a significantly higher BMR in winter than in summer, and had a larger liver, smaller intestine and entire digestive tract compared to birds examined in summer (Liu and Li 2006; Zheng et al. 2008b). Changes in the size of digestive organs in response to elevated daily energy intake could therefore result in elevated BMR (Williams and Tieleman 2000).

    Interspecific differences in metabolic intensity are linked with differences in mitochondrial densities, oxidative capacities and mitochondrial proton leaks (Else et al. 2004; Guderley et al. 2005). A strong correlation between metabolic rate, mitochondrial respiration, and proton leaks has been reported (Brookes et al. 1998; Li et al. 2010). The liver is one of the largest, and most metabolically active, organs in endotherms, and is considered to make an important contribution to BMR (Villarin et al. 2003; Zheng et al. 2008b). Mechanisms of heat generation in the liver include the uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation, futile cycling of substrates and high mass-specific metabolic intensity (Brand et al. 2003; Zheng et al. 2014a). For example, Else et al. (2004) compared the respiration rate of hepatocytes in five birds and found that these approximated the basal metabolic rate-body mass relationship. Similar results have also been obtained in small mammals. For example, in addition to higher BMR, Brandt's Voles (Lasiopodomys brandtii) also had higher mitochondrial state-4 respiration capacity and COX activity in the liver than Mongolian Gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus), suggesting that there is a relationship between these metabolic process and BMR (Li et al. 2010). In the present study, we found significant interspecific differences in state-4 respiration and COX activity in the liver, and significant, positive correlations between BMR and COX activity. These results suggest that the higher metabolic activity in the liver of Eurasian Tree Sparrows may contribute to the observed interspecific differences in BMR. This finding is in agreement with the results of our previous studies which show that seasonal and latitudinal variation in Eurasian Tree Sparrows was correlated not only with variation in BMR, but also in state-4 respiration and COX activity in the liver (Zheng et al. 2008b, 2014b).

    Because skeletal muscle mass comprises nearly 40 % of Mb, it is an important contributor to thermogenesis via shivering, and even nonshivering thermogenesis (Bicudo et al. 2001; Pitit and Vézina 2014). Furthermore, adjustment of cellular aerobic capacity in muscle potentially involves modulation of the activities of key catabolic enzymes in oxidative pathways, and, or, the activities of enzymes and transporters involved in substrate mobilization and delivery pathways (Marsh et al. 1990; Swanson 2010; Zheng et al. 2008b, 2014a). The results of this study demonstrate that Eurasian Tree Sparrows had higher mitochondrial state-4 respiration and COX activity than Bramblings and Little Buntings, and that there was a positive relationship between BMR, state-4 respiration and COX activity in these three species. This suggests that biochemical metabolic markers may be useful indicators of interspecific variation in BMR.

    The selective pressures that influence metabolism may be complex and influence metabolic rate via multiple avenues. Our results show that Eurasian Tree Sparrows had significantly higher BMR, digestive organ mass, mitochondrial state-4 respiration capacity and COX activity in the liver and muscle, than Bramblings and Little Buntings. This suggests that digestive organ mass and the above biochemical markers of metabolic activity are both strongly correlated with BMR in these species, and play an important role in the determination of BMR. Future studies could add to these results by measuring thyroid hormones (thyroxine and triiodothyronine), which affect adaptive thermogenesis by substrate cycling, ion cycling, and mitochondrial proton leakage (Yen 2001; Liu et al. 2006; Mullur et al. 2014). Additional avenues for further research on the mechanisms underlying BMR variations include quantifying inter- and intraspecific variation in avian uncoupling protein (avUCP), proton conductance, and myostatin, all of which can affect the basal thermogenesis of tissues (Dridi et al. 2004; Swanson 2010).

    JL provided the research idea and designed the experiments. MB, XU and KC conducted the experiments and collected the data. MB and XU finished the data analysis, compiled the results and wrote the first draft of the article. JL and WZ supervised the research and revised the draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    We thank Dr. Ron Moorhouse revising the English and giving some suggestions, and all the members of Animal Physiological Ecology Group, Wenzhou University Institute of Applied Ecology, for their helpful suggestions. This study was financially supported by Grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31470472), the National Undergraduate "Innovation" Project and Zhejiang Province's "Xinmiao" Project.

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

  • AlRashidi M. The challenge of coping in an extremely hot environment: a case study of the incubation of Lesser Crested Terns (Thalasseus bengalensis). Waterbirds. 2016;39:215–21.
    Amat JA, Gomez J, Linan-Cembrano G, Rendon MA, Ramo C. Incubating terns modify risk-taking according to diurnal variations in egg camouflage and ambient temperature. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2017;71:72.
    Antolos M, Roby DD, Lyons DE, Anderson SK, Collis K. Effects of nest density, location, and timing on breeding success of Caspian Terns. Waterbirds. 2006;29:465–72.
    Arnold JM, Saboom D, Nisbet ICT, Hatch JJ. Use of temperature sensors to monitor patterns of nocturnal desertion by incubating Common Terns. J Field Ornithol. 2006;77:384–91.
    Arnold JM, Hatch JJ, Nisbet ITC. Seasonal declines in reproductive success of the common tern Sterna hirundo: timing or parental quality? J Avian Biol. 2008;35:33–45.
    Bollinger PB, Bollinger EK, Malecki RA. Tests of three hypotheses of hatching asynchrony in the Common Tern. Auk. 1990;107:696–706.
    Bonter DN, Bridge ES. Applications of radio frequency identification (RFID) in ornithological research: a review. J Field Ornithol. 2011;82:1–10.
    Burger J, Gochfeld M. The Common Tern: Its breeding biology and social behavior. New York: Columbia University Press; 1991.
    Clode D, Birks JDS, Macdonald DW. The influence of risk and vulnerability on predator mobbing by terns (Sterna spp.) and gulls (Larus spp.). J Zool. 2000;252:53–9.
    Courtney P. Seasonal variation in intra-clutch hatching intervals among Common Terns Sterna hirundo. Ibis. 1979;121:207–11.
    Deeming DC, Reynolds SJ. Nests, eggs, and incubation: new ideas about avian reproduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
    Gotmark F, Andersson M. Colonial breeding reduces nest predation in the Common Gull (Larus canus). Anim Behav. 1984;32:485–92.
    Grant GS. Foot-wetting and belly-soaking by incubating Gull-billed Terns and Black Skimmers. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc. 1978;75:148–52.
    Grant GS. Belly-soaking by incubating common, sandwich, and royal terns. J Field Ornithol. 1981;52:244.
    Grant GS. Avian incubation: egg temperature, nest humidity, and behavioral thermoregulation in a hot environment. Ornithol Monogr. 1982;30:ⅲ.
    Hand JL, Hunt GL Jr, Warner M. Thermal stress and predation: influences on the colony structure of a gull colony and possibly breeding distributions. Condor. 1981;83:193–203.
    Hart LA, Downs CT, Brown M. Sitting in the sun: nest microhabitat affects incubation temperatures in seabirds. J Therm Biol. 2016;60:149–54.
    Hartman CA, Oring LW. An inexpensive method for remotely monitoring nest activity. J Field Ornithol. 2006;77:418–24.
    Hays H, LeCroy M. Field Criteria for determining incubation stage in eggs of the Common Tern. Wilson Bull. 1971;83:425–9.
    Hébert PN. Breeding failure and decline of a Common Tern colony in southern Manitoba. Col Waterbirds. 1985;8:183–5.
    Hunt GL Jr, Hunt MW. Reproductive ecology of the Western Gull: the importance of nest spacing. Auk. 1975;92:270–9.
    Kar T, Debata S. Breeding ecology of the endangered Black-Bellied Tern (Sterna acuticauda) in eastern India and implications for conservation. Waterbirds. 2019;42:314–20.
    Konishi S, Kitagawa G. Information criteria and statistical modeling. New York: Springer; 2008.
    Mallory ML. Reactions of ground-nesting marine birds to human disturbance in the Canadian Arctic. Arct Sci. 2016;2:67–77.
    Marshall N. Night desertion by nesting Common Terns. Wilson Bull. 1942;54:25–31.
    Martin TE. Food as a limit on breeding birds: a life-history perspective. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1987;18:453–87.
    Martin TE. A new view of avian life-history evolution tested on an incubation paradox. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2002;269:309–16.
    Maryland Department of Natural Resources. Maryland's Natural Areas: Skimmer Island, Worchester County. 2016. .
    Maryland Environmental Service. About Poplar Island. 2017. .
    Meehan TD, Nisbet ICT. Nest attentiveness in Common Terns threatened by a model predator. Waterbirds. 2002;25:278–84.
    Morris RD, Hunter RA. Monitoring incubation attentiveness of ground-nesting colonial seabirds. J Wildl Manage. 1976;40:354–7.
    Morris RD, Hunter RA, McElman JF. Factors affecting the reproductive success of Common Tern (Sterna hirundo) colonies on the lower Great Lakes during the summer of 1972. Can J Zool. 1976;54:1850–62.
    Neumann JL, Larose CS, Brodin G, Feare CJ. Foraging ranges of incubating Sooty Terns Onychoprion fuscatus on Bird Island, Seychelles, during a transition from food plenty to scarcity, as revealed by GPS loggers. Mar Ornithol. 2018;46:11–8.
    Nisbet ICT. Belly-soaking by incubating and brooding Common Terns. J Field Ornithol. 1983;54:190–2.
    Nisbet ICT, Cohen ME. Asynchronous hatching in Common and Roseate Terns Sterna hirundo and S. dougallii. Ibis. 1975;117:374–9.
    Nisbet ICT, Arnold JM, Oswald SA, Pyle P, Patten MA. Common Tern (Sterna hirundo). In: The Birds of North America. Cornell Lab of Ornithology. 2017. .
    Nisbet ICT, Welton MJ. Seasonal variation in breeding success of Common Terns: consequences of predation. Condor. 1984;86:53–60.
    NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. 2018. Climate Data Online. .
    Nordstrom M, Laine J, Ahola M, Korpimaki E. Reduced nest defence intensity and improved breeding success in terns as responses to removal of nonnative American mink. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2004;55:454–60.
    Norwood GJ. Nest-site selection, nocturnal nest desertion, and productivity in a Common Tern (Sterna hirundo) colony at Detroit River, Michigan. Master's Thesis. Ypsilanti, MI: Eastern Michigan University. 2011.
    Palestis BG. Nesting stage and nest defense by Common Terns. Waterbirds. 2005;28:87–94.
    R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2018. .
    Richardson TW, Gardali T, Jenkins SH. Review and meta-analysis of camera effects on avian nest success. J Wildl Manage. 2009;73:287–93.
    Riechert J, Becker PH. What makes a good parent? Sex-specific relationships between nest attendance, hormone levels, and breeding success in a long-lived seabird. Auk. 2017;134:644–58.
    Schneider EG, McWilliams SR. Using nest temperature to estimate nest attendance of Piping Plovers. J Wildl Manage. 2007;71:1998–2006.
    Seefelt NE, Farrell PD. Indirect negative impacts of Double-crested Cormorant (Palacrocorax auritus) management on co-nesting Caspain Terns (Hydroprogne caspia) in Northern Lake, Michigan, USA. Waterbirds. 2018;41:417–23.
    Shaffer SA, Clatterbuck CA, Kelsey EC, Naiman AD, Young LC, VanderWerf EA, et al. As the egg turns: monitoring egg attendance behavior in wild birds using novel data logging technology. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e97898.
    Shealer DA, Kress SW. Nocturnal abandonment response to Black-Crowned Night-Heron disturbance in a Common Tern colony. Col Waterbirds. 1991;14:51–6.
    Smithson M, Verkuilen J. A better lemon squeezer? Maximum-likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables. Psychol Methods. 2006;11:54–71.
    Sullivan JD, Marban PR, Mullinax JM, Brinker DF, McGowan PC, Callahan CR, et al. Assessing nest attentiveness of Common Terns (Sterna hirundo) via video cameras and temperature loggers. 2019. U.S. Geological Survey data release, .
    Taylor GT, Ackerman JT, Shaffer SA. Egg turning behavior and incubation temperature in Forester's terns in relation to mercury contamination. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0191390.
    U.S. Navy Observatory. Sun or Moon Rise/Set Table for One Year. 2016. .
    Vedder O, Kurten N, Bouwhuis S. Interspecific variation in and environmentdependent resource allocation to embryonic development time in Common Terns. Physiol Biochem Zool. 2017;4:453–60.
    Wall JW, Marban PR, Brinker DF, Sullivan JD, Zimnik M, Murrow JL, et al. A video surveillance system to monitor breeding colonies of Common Terns (Sterna hirundo). J Vis Exp. 2018;137:e57928.
    Weathers WW, Zaun BJ. Egg-turning behavior and nest attentiveness of the endangered Hawaiian Goose on Kauai. West Birds. 2010;41:2–9.
    Webb DR, King JR. An analysis of the heat budgets of the eggs and nest of the White-Crowned Sparrow, Zonotrichia leucophrys, in relation to parental attentiveness. Physiol Zool. 1983;56:493–505.
    Wendeln H, Becker PH. Does distrubance by nocturnal predators affect body mass of adult Common Terns? Waterbirds. 1999;22:401–10.
    Wiggins DA, Morris RD. Parental care of the Common Tern Sterna hirundo. Ibis. 1987;129:533–40.
    Yoon J, Yoon H, Go B, Joo E, Park S. Tide associated incubation and foraging behavior of Saunders's Gulls Larus saundersi. Ardea. 2014;101:99–104.

Catalog

    Figures(4)  /  Tables(7)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1088) PDF downloads (4) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return