
Citation: | Fasheng Zou, Qiang Zhang, Min Zhang, Myung-Bok Lee, Xincai Wang, Yuening Gong, Changteng Yang. 2019: Temporal patterns of three sympatric pheasant species in the Nanling Mountains: N-mixture modeling applied to detect abundance. Avian Research, 10(1): 42. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-019-0181-6 |
The reliability of long-term population estimates is crucial for conservation and management purposes. Most previous studies assume that count indices are proportionally related to abundance; however, this assumption may not hold when detection varies spatially and temporally. We examined seasonal variations in abundance of three bird species (Cabot's Tragopan Tragopan caboti, Silver Pheasant Lophura nycthemera, and White-necklaced Partridge Arborophila gingica) along an elevational gradient, using N-mixture models that take into account imperfect detection in our bird data.
Camera-trapping was used to monitor temporal activity patterns of these species at Guangdong Nanling National Nature Reserve from December 2013 to November 2017 (4 seasons per year). For abundance analysis (N-mixture modeling), we divided a year into 4 seasons, i.e. 3 months per season, and performed the analysis by season. Elevation was incorporated into the N-mixture model as a covariate that may affect abundance. We compared the N-mixture model with a null model (no covariate model) and selected the better model based on AIC values to make an inference.
From 24 sampling sites, we obtained 6786 photographs of 8482 individuals of 44 bird species and 26 mammal species. Silver Pheasant was photographed much more frequently and showed higher temporal activity frequency than White-necklaced Partridge or Cabot's Tragopan. Silver Pheasant was camera-captured most frequently in summer, and other two species in winters. All three species had two daytime activity peaks: between 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m., and between 5:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m., respectively. Our estimated abundance and detection probability from the N-mixture model were variable by season. In particular, all three species showed greater abundance in summer than in winter, and estimated abundance patterns of all three species were more similar with observed camera-trapping counts in summers. Moreover, in winter, elevation had a positive impact on abundance of Silver Pheasant and Cabot's Tragopan, but not on White-necklaced Partridge.
Our results demonstrate that the N-mixture model performed well in the estimation of temporal population abundance at local fixed permanent plots in mountain habitat in southern China, based on the modeling of repeated camera-trapping counts. The seasonal differences in abundance of the three endemic bird species and the strong effect of elevation on abundance of two species in winter were only indicative of variations in spatio-temporal distribution within species and between species. In identifying suitable habitat for endemic pheasants, the positive elevational effect also suggests that more attention should be paid to conservation of areas with higher elevation in the Nanling Mountains.
The Scaly-sided Merganser (Mergus squamatus, Plate Ⅰ) is recognized as a globally threatened waterfowl and is among the rarest sea ducks in the Palaearctic realm. Since its small and declining population is suffering from habitat loss, illegal hunting and disturbance, this species is included in the EN (Endangered) category of the IUCN Red List (BirdLife International, 2001, 2004). It is listed in the first rank category of the List of the Protected Wildlife of National Importance in China (China Wildlife Conservation Association, 1990), as well as in the category of rare birds in Russia and Korea. It is estimated that the global population size of the Scaly-sided Merganser is between 2400–4500 individuals. They breed mainly in far eastern Russia and in the northeast of China and winter in the southern China and Korea (Hughes and Bocharnikov, 1992; Hughes and Hunter, 1994; Kolomiitsev, 1995; BirdLife International, 2001; He et al., 2002; Shokhrin and Solovieva, 2003). The Changbai Mountain range is a very important and a major breeding ground of this bird in China. Given the lack of continuous studies on the breeding population of the Scaly-sided Merganser in the Changbai Mountain range after the 1990s, the distribution and current status of this species is not well known in this area. With the guidance of methodology from Drs. Solovieva and Hughes, we made continuous and repeated surveys for the breeding population of the Scaly-sided Merganser in the Changbai Mountain range during the spring and summer of both 2008 and 2009. Besides the breeding densities, this study provided the sex-age structure and brood size of this species in the Changbai Mountain range.
Our study area covers mountain rivers between coordinates 41–44°N and 125–129°E. A total of 1553 km, 17 stretches in four different river systems of the Tumenjiang, Songhuajiang, Yalujiang and Mudanjiang rivers, were repeatedly surveyed during 2008 and 2009 (Fig. 1). In order to decrease the error in the surveys, we randomly selected stretches longer than 60 km and kept the survey distance on each stretch as long as we could, but always more than 30 km. The first 30 km from the source of each river were not surveyed, because these represent unsuitable habitats for the Scaly-sided Merganser (Kolomiytsev, 1990; Shokhrin and Solovieva, 2003; Fu and Chen, 2006). Seven stretches were surveyed both in 2008 and 2009. The breeding survey started in the middle of April, soon after the river ice cover broke up when the Scaly-sided Mergansers just arrived at their breeding habitats in the spring, while the brood survey was conducted during the middle of July and the middle of August when most ducklings had hatched but before they got fully fledged. During our surveys, only the individuals left behind the surveyors were counted. We counted the numbers of breeding pairs, trios, single males, single females, broods, brood-rearing females and flocks of this bird. We counted single males as breeding pairs since the coupled females might be laying eggs in their nests. We judged single females as breeding pairs only when single males were not found within the nearest 3 km. Since trios (one male with two females) are common in the breeding season, we counted trios also as breeding pairs (Solovieva et al., 2006). The densities of breeding pairs, broods and individuals are expressed as the number of breeding pairs/broods/individuals (inds) per km of river ± 1 SD respectively.
The densities of breeding pairs, broods and individuals of the Scaly-sided Merganser along each river surveyed in the Changbai Mountain range during 2008 and 2009 are presented in Tables 1 and 2. The total densities of breeding pairs were 0.26 ± 0.30 pairs per km, for broods 0.14 ± 0.14 per km and 0.75 ± 0.88 individuals per km at all the rivers over both years.
River | Survey distance (km) | Number of individuals | Pair density (pairs·km–1) | Bird density (spring, inds·km–1) | Total density over both years | |||||||||
2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | Pair density (pairs·km–1) | Bird density (inds·km–1) | |||||
Manjiang | 34 | 51 | 25 | 47 | 0.353 | 0.353 | 0.735 | 0.922 | 0.353 | 0.829 | ||||
Yalujiang_Changbai_ Linjiang | 32 | 270 | 3 | 7 | 0.094 | 0.007 | 0.094 | 0.026 | 0.051 | 0.060 | ||||
Hunjiang_Upper | − | 34 | − | 0 | − | 0.000 | − | 0.000 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Hunjiang_Lower | − | 29 | − | 2 | − | 0.000 | − | 0.069 | 0 | 0.069 | ||||
Yalujiang_Ji'an | − | 40 | − | 2 | − | 0.025 | − | 0.050 | 0.025 | 0.050 | ||||
Toudaosonghuajiang | 38 | 19 | 87 | 51 | 0.711 | 0.526 | 2.289 | 2.684 | 0.619 | 2.487 | ||||
Erdaosonghuajiang | 29 | 29 | 8 | 10 | 0.103 | 0.172 | 0.276 | 0.345 | 0.138 | 0.311 | ||||
Fuerhe | 33 | 36 | 75 | 84 | 1.030 | 0.806 | 2.273 | 2.333 | 0.918 | 2.303 | ||||
Songjiang | 26 | 26 | 33 | 1 | 0.538 | 0.000 | 1.269 | 0.038 | 0.538 | 0.654 | ||||
Erdaobaihe | − | 12 | − | 6 | − | 0.250 | − | 0.500 | 0.250 | 0.500 | ||||
Hongqihe | − | 32 | − | 3 | − | 0.063 | − | 0.094 | 0.063 | 0.094 | ||||
Xilinhe | − | 27 | − | 12 | − | 0.111 | − | 0.444 | 0.111 | 0.444 | ||||
Songjianghe | 29.5 | 34 | 31 | 26 | 0.305 | 0.382 | 1.051 | 0.765 | 0.344 | 0.908 | ||||
Mudanjiang | 21 | − | 4 | − | 0 | − | 0.190 | − | 0 | 0.190 | ||||
Zhuerduohe | 26 | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | ||||
Total/Mean | 268.5 | 639 | 266 | 251 | 0.35 | 0.21 | 0.91 | 0.64 | 0.26 | 0.75 |
River | Survey distance (km) | Number of individuals | Number of broods | Brood density (broods·km–1) | Total brood density over both years (broods·km–1) | ||||||||
2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | ||||||
Manjiang | 30 | 51 | 98 | 150 | 13 | 19 | 0.433 | 0.373 | 0.403 | ||||
Yalujiang _Changbai_Linjiang | 32 | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | ||||
Yalujiang_Ji'an | − | 40 | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | ||||
Hunjiang_Lower | − | 29 | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | ||||
Hongqihe | − | 32 | − | 11 | − | 1 | − | 0.031 | 0.031 | ||||
Toudaosonghuajiang | 38 | − | 13 | − | 2 | − | 0.053 | − | 0.053 | ||||
Erdaosonghuajiang | 29 | 29 | 12 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 0.069 | 0.069 | 0.069 | ||||
Fuerhe | 47 | 36 | 105 | 106 | 13 | 12 | 0.277 | 0.333 | 0.305 | ||||
Songjiang | 26 | − | 4 | − | 1 | − | 0.038 | − | 0.038 | ||||
Erdaobaihe | − | 12 | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | − | 0 | ||||
Xilinhe | 30 | 27 | 42 | 32 | 5 | 4 | 0.167 | 0.148 | 0.158 | ||||
Songjianghe | 40 | 34 | 171 | 78 | 19 | 11 | 0.475 | 0.324 | 0.400 | ||||
Mudanjiang | 21 | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | ||||
Gudonghe | 37 | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | ||||
Zhuerduohe | 26 | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | ||||
Total/Mean | 356 | 290 | 445 | 392 | 55 | 49 | 0.140 | 0.140 | 0.140 |
During the spring surveys, all the flocked birds were counted as sub-adults or non-breeding individuals. In total 127 individuals and 19 flocks were counted in the spring surveys over both years. The proportion of flocked birds was 24.56%. We counted a total of 189 breeding pairs (102 in 2008 and 87 in 2009) over both years, including 26 trios (15 in 2008 and 11 in 2009). The proportion of trios to all the breeding pairs was 13.76%. A total of 59 sub-adult males and 167 adult males were counted over both years. The proportion of sub-adult males to all males was 26.11%. In the spring surveys, we counted a total of 230 males and 268 females. The sex ratio was 1:1.17.
We counted a total of 49 and 39 brood clusters in the summer surveys in 2008 and 2009. These brood clusters included 6 amalgamated broods (2 in 2008 and 4 in 2009). Brood amalgamation is common in the Scaly-sided Merganser in the Changbai mountains. They are often formed in some habitats with high brood densities. Some broods become amalgamated or had already combined one or two days after they left their nests, through the competition between brood rearing hens. The amalgamated brood size varies considerably, but usually ranges from 20 to 40. We once recorded an amalgamated brood with 44 ducklings in 2008. According to a report of the largest clutches of this bird (Yelsukov, 1994), as well as a total 16 eggs once recorded in a natural nest of the Scaly-sided Merganser by us in 2007, we regarded those brood clusters with more than 16 (not including the 16) ducklings as amalgamated broods. The normal brood size had an average of 7.83 ± 2.92 ducklings in 2008 and 7.49 ± 2.98 in 2009; no significant difference was found in brood size between 2008 and 2009 (t80= 0.60). Estimation that how many broods an amalgamated brood was composed of was made by dividing the number of ducklings of an amalgamated brood by the average brood size of the same year. In this way, we estimated that the 2 amalgamated broods with 32 and 33 ducklings respectively in 2008 were composed of 4 broods each, while the 4 amalgamated broods in 2009 with 17, 22, 29 and 34 ducklings were composed of 2, 3, 4 and 5 broods respectively. We made a correction to the number of broods to 55 in 2008 and 49 in 2009.
From the data of breeding pair density over both years in Table 1 and brood density over both years in Table 2, we found the rivers with high densities of the Scaly-sided Merganser (pair density > 0.3 pairs per km and brood density > 0.1 broods per km) to be the Manjiang, Songjianghe, Fuerhe and Xilinhe. All four rivers are tributaries of the Songhuajiang river system. They are situated at the two ends of a rectangle strip of about 120 km long and 50 km wide. Obviously, these rivers are the key sites for the Scaly-sided Merganser breeding in the Changbai Mountain range. They account for more than 50% of the breeding pairs and for more than 90% of the broods of this bird in this mountain range. High densities of breeding pairs were recorded in the Toudaosonghuajiang and Songjiang rivers in the spring of 2008, while brood densities in these two rivers were extremely low. Nor did we find any broods along the stretch of the Songjiang river, surveyed in the summer of 2008 and concluded therefore that these two places were not breeding locations, but merely stop-over sites for the Scaly-sided Mergansers. Every year, the Scaly-sided Mergansers come first to the lower and middle reaches of the Yalujiang River. Their arrival occurs around the middle of March. Birds may stay there for some time and suddenly leave around the middle of April. We did not record any broods of this merganser along this river during either year. The Yalujiang River could be an important stop-over site and a pass way for the migratory Scaly-sided Mergansers.
During our surveys along the Manjiang, Songjianghe, Fuerhe and Xilinhe rivers, a total of 50 broods were recorded in 2008 and 46 in 2009. They accounted for 92.31% of the total number of broods over both years (90.9% in 2008 and 93.8% in 2009). According to our investigation, we estimated the length of the brood rearing habitats of the Scaly-sided Merganser along each of these four rivers to be as follows: 80 km along the Manjiang River, 60 km for the Songjianghe River, 75 km along the Fuerhe River and 30 km along the Xilinhe River.
Multiplying the length of each suitable stretch with the average brood density over the two years of any particular river, we obtained the estimated number of broods for each river. From the four estimates, we summarized the number of broods, accommodated along all these four rivers, to be 83. With this summary and the ratio of 92.31%, we estimated the total number of broods for the entire Changbai Mountain range to be about 90. Broods stay on their natal rivers until fledging, hence the ratio between breeding pair density and brood density can serve as an indicator of nesting success (Shokhrin and Solovieva, 2003; Solovieva and Shokhrin, 2008). During the spring survey, we recorded a total of 102 breeding pairs in 2008 and 87 in 2009. The brood vs breeding pair ratios were 53.92% in 2008 and 56.32% in 2009, as well as 55.03% on average. From the ratios between the average number of breeding pairs and broods for both years, we calculated the number of breeding pairs of the Scaly-sided Mergansers in the Changbai Mountain range, to be about 164. Actually, we could arrive at this estimation directly from the number of breeding pairs. By multiplying the length of each suitable stretch with the average breeding pair density of the same river, we could obtain the estimated number of breeding pairs along all four rivers as 124 pairs in total. During our survey in the spring of 2008 and 2009, a total of 55 and 64 breeding pairs were recorded along the partial stretches of these four rivers. The number of breeding pairs along the four rivers as a proportion of the entire number of breeding pairs surveyed, over both years, is 62.96%. With this ratio and the estimated total number of breeding pairs for the four rivers, we estimated the number of breeding pairs for the entire Changbai Mountain range to be about 197 pairs. Considering the far higher breeding pair densities in the spring and the extremely low brood densities in the summer along stretches of the Toudaosonghuajiang and Songjiang rivers in 2008, we suspect that the breeding pair density in 2008 was overestimated. Considering these estimated results, we would prefer to decrease the estimated range to 150–190 pairs of Scaly-sided Mergansers in the Changbai mountains.
Historically, the Scaly-sided Merganser was once widely distributed in the northeast of China during the breeding season, including some areas in the Great Xing'an mountains, the Lesser Xing'an mountains, Inner Mongolia and the Changbai mountains. But with social and economic developments, tremendous environmental changes have taken place in the breeding grounds of this species in northeastern China. These developments include large-scale deforestation, dam construction and other intensive anthropological activities. These changes might have serious effects on the status of the Scaly-sided Merganser in northeastern China, both in terms of distribution area and population trend. It was squeezed out and is absent from many of its historic habitats. At present in northeastern China, it is highly compressed in only a few sites. The distribution area of this species has sharply decreased during the last 50 years in northeastern China. This sharp decrease covered the Changbai mountains as well. Deforestation of the Changbai mountains started during the Japanese occupation and the Puppet Government in the 1930s. Most of the virgin forests outside the boundaries of the Changbai Mountain Nature Reserve were harvested during the period from the 1950s to the 1990s. While after the 1990s, our government enforced the protection of virgin forests in the Changbai mountains, the areas of virgin forests left are too few and most of the secondary forests are too young to provide enough natural cavities for breeding of this bird. With intensifying disturbance and deterioration of the remaining habitats of this species, largely caused by sand dredging, road and dam construction, as well as profitable boat drifting activities in the 2000s, the distribution of the Scaly-sided Merganser in the Changbai mountains greatly changed. Some major known historic breeding sites were lost (e.g. the Gudonghe and Sandaobaihe rivers), but a few unknown breeding sites have been recently discovered (e.g. along the Fuerhe and Hongqihe rivers). In addition, the present breeding densities of the Scaly-sided Merganser in some rivers (i.e., the Erdaobaihe and Manjiang rivers) are much lower than those in the 1990s. Nevertheless, the number of the Scaly-sided Mergansers in the Changbai mountains we estimated during our study, are more than the number estimated by Zhao and his collaborators in the 1990s (Zhao et al., 1994; Zhao and Wu, 1994). We attribute this difference to errors accrued from the differences in survey methods and survey areas between our present study and that in the 1990s, not necessarily to an increasing population trend of the Scaly-sided Merganser in the Changbai mountains over the past two decades.
We would like to express our appreciation to Dr. Baz Hughes and Dr. Diana Solovieva for their guidance in methodology and encouragement. Field expeditions were sponsored by the Rufford Small Grant of the Rufford Foundation. We thank the participants in our field surveys, i.e., Hongliang Zhu, Bin Zhang and Anling Zhang.
Bivand RS, Pebesma EJ, Gomez-Rubio V, Pebesma EJ. Applied spatial data analysis with R. Berlin: Springer; 2013.
|
Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2002. p. 49–97.
|
Carbone C, Christie S, Conforti K, Coulson T, Franklin N, Ginsberg J, et al. The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001. p. 75–9.
|
Gao YR. Silver Pheasant (Lophura nycthemera). In: Lu TC, editor. The rare and endangered gamebirds in China. Fuzhou: Fujan Science and Technology Press; 1991. p. 272–91.
|
Halle S. Ecological relevance of daily activity patterns. In: Halle S, Stenseth NC, editors. Activity patterns in small mammals. Berlin: Springer; 2000. p. 67–90.
|
Kéry M, Royle A. Applied hierarchical modeling in ecology: analysis of distribution, abundance and species richness in R and BUGS. San Diego: Academic Press; 2016. p. 3–78.
|
Lu TC. The rare and endangered gamebirds in China. Fuzhou: Fujian Science and Technology Press; 1991. p. 1–2.
|
Mahendiran M. Coexistence of three sympatric cormorants (Phalacrocorax spp.); partitioning of time as an ecological resource. R Soc Open Sci. 2016;3:160–75.
|
Pang X. Biodiversity research in Nanling National Nature Reserve of Guangdong. Guangzhou: Science and Technology Publishing House of Guangdong; 2003.
|
Xu J, Zou PZ, Wen CY, Chen JR. An investigation on the fauna of birds in Nanling Nature Reserve. J Shaoguan Univ. 2001;22:97–107.
|
Zhang Z, Ding C, Ding P, Zheng G. The current status and a conservation strategy for species of Gralliformes in China. Chin Biodivers. 2003;11:414–21.
|
Zhao ZJ. A handbook of the birds of China. Changchun: Jilin Science and Technology Press; 2001.
|
Zou FS, Lu XL, Wang XC, Gong YN, Song XJ, Chen ZH, et al. Species diversity of terrestrial birds in forests of North Guangdong. Chin J Ecol. 2018;37:1227–32.
|
River | Survey distance (km) | Number of individuals | Pair density (pairs·km–1) | Bird density (spring, inds·km–1) | Total density over both years | |||||||||
2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | Pair density (pairs·km–1) | Bird density (inds·km–1) | |||||
Manjiang | 34 | 51 | 25 | 47 | 0.353 | 0.353 | 0.735 | 0.922 | 0.353 | 0.829 | ||||
Yalujiang_Changbai_ Linjiang | 32 | 270 | 3 | 7 | 0.094 | 0.007 | 0.094 | 0.026 | 0.051 | 0.060 | ||||
Hunjiang_Upper | − | 34 | − | 0 | − | 0.000 | − | 0.000 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Hunjiang_Lower | − | 29 | − | 2 | − | 0.000 | − | 0.069 | 0 | 0.069 | ||||
Yalujiang_Ji'an | − | 40 | − | 2 | − | 0.025 | − | 0.050 | 0.025 | 0.050 | ||||
Toudaosonghuajiang | 38 | 19 | 87 | 51 | 0.711 | 0.526 | 2.289 | 2.684 | 0.619 | 2.487 | ||||
Erdaosonghuajiang | 29 | 29 | 8 | 10 | 0.103 | 0.172 | 0.276 | 0.345 | 0.138 | 0.311 | ||||
Fuerhe | 33 | 36 | 75 | 84 | 1.030 | 0.806 | 2.273 | 2.333 | 0.918 | 2.303 | ||||
Songjiang | 26 | 26 | 33 | 1 | 0.538 | 0.000 | 1.269 | 0.038 | 0.538 | 0.654 | ||||
Erdaobaihe | − | 12 | − | 6 | − | 0.250 | − | 0.500 | 0.250 | 0.500 | ||||
Hongqihe | − | 32 | − | 3 | − | 0.063 | − | 0.094 | 0.063 | 0.094 | ||||
Xilinhe | − | 27 | − | 12 | − | 0.111 | − | 0.444 | 0.111 | 0.444 | ||||
Songjianghe | 29.5 | 34 | 31 | 26 | 0.305 | 0.382 | 1.051 | 0.765 | 0.344 | 0.908 | ||||
Mudanjiang | 21 | − | 4 | − | 0 | − | 0.190 | − | 0 | 0.190 | ||||
Zhuerduohe | 26 | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | ||||
Total/Mean | 268.5 | 639 | 266 | 251 | 0.35 | 0.21 | 0.91 | 0.64 | 0.26 | 0.75 |
River | Survey distance (km) | Number of individuals | Number of broods | Brood density (broods·km–1) | Total brood density over both years (broods·km–1) | ||||||||
2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | ||||||
Manjiang | 30 | 51 | 98 | 150 | 13 | 19 | 0.433 | 0.373 | 0.403 | ||||
Yalujiang _Changbai_Linjiang | 32 | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | ||||
Yalujiang_Ji'an | − | 40 | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | ||||
Hunjiang_Lower | − | 29 | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | ||||
Hongqihe | − | 32 | − | 11 | − | 1 | − | 0.031 | 0.031 | ||||
Toudaosonghuajiang | 38 | − | 13 | − | 2 | − | 0.053 | − | 0.053 | ||||
Erdaosonghuajiang | 29 | 29 | 12 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 0.069 | 0.069 | 0.069 | ||||
Fuerhe | 47 | 36 | 105 | 106 | 13 | 12 | 0.277 | 0.333 | 0.305 | ||||
Songjiang | 26 | − | 4 | − | 1 | − | 0.038 | − | 0.038 | ||||
Erdaobaihe | − | 12 | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | − | 0 | ||||
Xilinhe | 30 | 27 | 42 | 32 | 5 | 4 | 0.167 | 0.148 | 0.158 | ||||
Songjianghe | 40 | 34 | 171 | 78 | 19 | 11 | 0.475 | 0.324 | 0.400 | ||||
Mudanjiang | 21 | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | ||||
Gudonghe | 37 | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | ||||
Zhuerduohe | 26 | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | ||||
Total/Mean | 356 | 290 | 445 | 392 | 55 | 49 | 0.140 | 0.140 | 0.140 |