Lijun Chen, Zufei Shu, Wutao Yao, Yong Ma, Wenhong Xiao, Xiaoqun Huang. 2019: Combined effects of habitat and interspecific interaction define co-occurrence patterns of sympatric Galliformes. Avian Research, 10(1): 29. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-019-0169-2
Citation: Lijun Chen, Zufei Shu, Wutao Yao, Yong Ma, Wenhong Xiao, Xiaoqun Huang. 2019: Combined effects of habitat and interspecific interaction define co-occurrence patterns of sympatric Galliformes. Avian Research, 10(1): 29. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-019-0169-2

Combined effects of habitat and interspecific interaction define co-occurrence patterns of sympatric Galliformes

Funds: 

the National Key Research and Development Program of China 2017YFC0503802

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2017M 620905

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Lijun Chen, chenlijun@ioz.ac.cn

  • Received Date: 31 Mar 2019
  • Accepted Date: 24 Jul 2019
  • Available Online: 24 Apr 2022
  • Publish Date: 30 Jul 2019
  • Background 

    Disentangling the relative importance of environmental variables and interspecific interaction in modulating co-occurrence patterns of sympatric species is essential for understanding the mechanisms of community assembly and biodiversity. For the two sympatric Galliformes, Silver Pheasants (Lophura nycthemera) and White-necklaced Partridges (Arborophila gingica), we know little about the role of habitat use and interspecific interactions in modulating their coexistence.

    Methods 

    We adopted a probabilistic approach incorporating habitat preference and interspecific interaction using occupancy model to account for imperfect detection, and used daily activity pattern analysis to investigate the co-occurrence pattern of these two sympatric Galliformes in wet and dry seasons.

    Results 

    We found that the detection probability of Silver Pheasant and White-necklaced Partridge were related to habitat variables and interspecific interaction. The presence of Silver Pheasant increases the detection probability of White-necklaced Partridge in both the wet and dry season. However, the presence of White-necklaced Partridges increases the detection probability of Silver Pheasants in the wet season, but decreases the probability in the dry season. Further, Silver Pheasants were detected frequently in the sites of high values of enhanced vegetable index (EVI) in both the wet and dry season, and in sites away from human residential settlement in the wet season. White-necklaced partridges were mainly detected in low EVI sites. The site use probabilities of two Galliformes were best explained by habitat variables, Silver Pheasants and White-necklaced Partridges preferred steeper areas during the wet and dry season. Both species mainly occurred in low EVI areas during the wet season and occupied sites away from the resident settlement during the dry season. Moreover, the site use probabilities of two species had opposite relationships with forest canopy coverage. Silver Pheasants preferred areas with high forest canopy coverage whereas White-necklaced Partridges preferred low forest canopy coverage in the dry season, and vice versa in the wet season. Species interaction factor (SIF) corroborated weak evidence of the dependence of the site use of one species on that of the other in the either dry or wet season. Temporally, high overlapping of daily activity pattern indicated no significantly temporal niche differentiation between sympatric Galliformes in both wet and dry seasons.

    Conclusions 

    Our results demonstrated that the presence of two species influenced the detection probability interactively and there was no temporal partitioning in activity time between Silver Pheasants and White-necklaced Partridges in the wet and dry seasons. The site use probability of two Galliformes was best explained by habitat variables, especially the forest canopy coverage. Therefore, environmental variables and interspecific interaction are the leading drivers regulating the detection and site use probability and promoting co-occurrence of Silver Pheasants and White-necklaced Partridges.

  • It is well known that birds and other vertebrates nest in colonies during the breeding season. The benefit of colonial breeding is obvious, especially in defending against predators and for forging food (Götmark and Andersson 1984; Danchin and Wagner 1997). But this comes at the cost of enhancing trans-shell infection by parasites, because the number of pathogenic parasites is closely related to nest density (Brown and Brown 1986; Tella 2002). In birds, adults have evolved an array of specific morphological, physiological and behavioral mechanisms to cope with parasites (Kaplan 1985; Mousseau and Fox 1998), but the most effective mechanism is their own immune system which is composed of two different branches: innate immunity responses are relatively rapid, non-specific defenses while acquired immunity responses are typically slower and highly pathogen-specific (Klasing and Leshchinsky 1999). However, the immune system of chicks at their early stage is immature and the chicks are virulently vulnerable to pathogenic parasites. To compensate for this parents can, to a considerable extent, affect the survival of their offspring by transmitting immune factors into eggs via maternal effects (Pastoret et al. 1998).

    Avian eggs contain a network of immune factors: immunoglobulin, which represents acquired immunity, is mainly transmitted into the yolk via specific responses to pathogens (Kowalczyk et al. 1985); lysozyme which is the major component of their innate immunity and transmitted into the albumen can protect the chick from parasites by digesting the peptidoglycan of the cell walls of bacteria (Javurkova et al. 2015).

    Females could, therefore, deposit different levels of lysozyme in the eggs of neonatal birds to resist the local parasitic environment, because the various kind of parasites are dependent on the breeding density, which varies among nest sites (Brown and Brown 1986; Tella 2002).

    Indeed, a previous study has shown that females declined lysozyme in plasma before laying egg and that the clutch size is negatively related to lysozyme concentrations (Saino et al. 2002). This suggests that egg lysozymes derive from the mother whose production of female lysozyme is limited and hence females may deposit lysozyme in eggs differentially within a clutch. There are only few references in the current literature about the allocation of lysozyme into eggs, of which some suggests stability (Shawkey et al. 2008; D'Alba et al. 2010) and the rest shows a decreased allocation in the laying sequence (Saino et al. 2002).

    In this study, our first objective was to investigate the relationship between breeding density and lysozyme levels in eggs of the Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo) and secondly we wanted to analyze the variation in the level of lysozyme with the sequence of laying eggs within a clutch. This variation may reflect the performance of chicks in the future.

    Our study was carried out in a breeding colony of Great Cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo) from April to May of 2013, located on an island in Qinghai Lake (36°58′N, 99°54′E). The Great Cormorant is a migratory bird, nesting on this island on cliffs and an ichthyophagous bird of the Pelecaniformes. The species is monogamous, asynchronous with a mean clutch size of four. Both parents take turns on incubation which lasts for 28 days, after which the offspring will be fed until 60 days before fledging.

    In our daily detection work, eggs were marked according to the order of laying, then each day collected between 18:00 and 19:00 h. We determined the breeding density by the number of nests within a radius of 3 m around one particular nest. The eggs collected replaced with dummy eggs to prevent females from abandoning their nests. Egg length and breadth were measured with a caliper, to the nearest 0.1 mm and weight was measured with a balance with an accuracy of 0.1 g. Egg volumes were estimated by Hoyt's formula, i.e., volume = length × breadth2 × 0.51. The collected eggs were then cracked open in a bio-safety cabinet entirely under sterile conditions. The yolk was separated from the albumen by using sterile pipettes and the albumen was stored at −20 ℃.

    Our lysozyme assay consisted of four steps (Shawkey et al. 2008). (1) We put 25 mg of dried Micrococcus lysodeikticus (Sigma) in a 50 mL 1 % agar solution (Sangon Biotech Ltd) and cultivated the suspension at a temperature of 50 ℃. (2) We then mixed 150 μL of this suspension with each 10 μL albumen sample on a 96-well plate. The standard curve is obtained by adding the bacterial suspension to serial dilutions of a standard lysozyme solution (Sigma). (3) In our third step plates were incubated overnight at room temperature and absorbance was measured with a Versamax microplate reader at a 850 nm wavelength. (4) In the end, we calculated the concentration of lysozymes in each sample by a standard curve. All tests were repeated three times to ensure the accuracy of the results (RSD < 2.5 %).

    All of our research was carried out with the approval of the Wildlife Service of the Qinghai Forestry Department, by collecting permits from the Qinghai Lake National Nature Reserve. We will remove all dummy eggs immediately after clutch completion to minimize the impact on the populations.

    All statistical data were performed in SPSS 20.0. We used one way ANOVA to test the variation between the laying order and lysozyme concentrations. Correlation analysis was carried out in order to investigate the relationship between the concentration of lysozyme and nests density.

    Our results revealed that the concentration of lysozyme increased with the laying order (F = 9.950, p = 0.001 < 0.05, Fig. 1), with the last egg laid having the highest lysozyme level. The difference of lysozyme between the first three eggs was also significant(F = 5.43, p = 0.041 < 0.05). The variation between lysozyme and the laying order was independent of egg weight (F = 1.09, p = 0.31) and egg volume (F = 0.84, p = 0.36), while the level of lysozyme between clutches is positively related to nests density (R = 0.8832, p < 0.0001, Pearson correlation).

    Figure  1.  Mean (±SE) lysozyme concentrations of Great Cormorant eggs in relation to the position within the laying sequence (n = 80)

    From the results, we found the levels of lysozyme to be positively correlated to breeding density. In eggs, lysozyme not only contributes to physical defense but also to chemical defense (Trziszka 1994), hence higher concentrations of lysozyme may reflect stronger protection of eggs against parasites during embryo development. The number of pathogenic parasites has demonstrated close correlation with breeding density, so it may be adaptive for birds to deposit more lysozyme in eggs when breeding density is high.

    Alternatively, the relationship between levels of lysozyme and breeding density may be a reflection of good health in females. The Great Cormorant in Qinghai Lake migrates long distances and then breeds in Qinghai Lake. According to our observations, the early arrivals always nested in the center of a colony. Since the level of lysozyme in females decreases before laying eggs, the higher levels of lysozyme in the center is consistent with the condition of the female.

    Our results show that the lysozyme concentration increases with the laying sequence within a clutch, in contrast to the result in barn swallows (Saino et al. 2002). Most birds have to incubate before clutch completion, which causes asynchronously hatching (Clark and Wilson 1981; Stoleson and Beissinger 1995), because the first-laid eggs stay longer in the nest than those laid the last and are easily infected by parasites (Cook et al. 2005). Consequently, a hierarchy of size or body mass among siblings is established. The mother can deposit various kinds of substances in eggs to mitigate or enhance the hierarchy in the: steroid hormones of her brood (Schwabl 1993; Lipar and Ketterson 2000; Eising et al. 2001), carotenoids (Blount et al. 2002; Saino et al. 2002) in egg yolk and lysozyme in egg albumen (Saino et al. 2002). Two of the most important theories can be invoked to explain the significance of different allocations: one is the brood-reduction theory which posits that parents transmit more resources into the first-laid eggs to enhance their reproductive value when food is scarce (Vinuela 1997; Gil et al. 1999); the other is the brood-survival theory suggesting that parents mitigate the disadvantages of the younger members of the clutch to improve the survival of whole brood (Schwabl 1997; Lipar et al. 1999). Our results may provide some evidence for the brood-survival theory. Although there is no direct evidence that lysozyme can improve the viability of offspring, the levels of lysozyme in neonatal birds before 12 days is mainly derived maternally. Hence, the fact that females invest more lysozyme in the last-laid eggs not only provides more effective defense for the last-laid eggs but also can help the last-hatched birds to save more resources in order to catch up with their siblings.

    The allocation of lysozyme on the basis of the local environment and the combination of asynchronous hatching with differential lysozyme allocation within a clutch, will allow mothers to improve the survival probability of the entire brood. This may be adaptive for birds, but in the future we should invest more resources to investigate how lysozyme affects the survival of birds.

    LL designed the experiments and JC conducted the experiments. JC, JL WW, FY and ZL analyzed the data and finished the earlier draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    We thank the entire staff of the Qinghai Lake National Nature Reserve for its assistance when we worked in the field, as well as Krill, Shouyang Du, Chao Ma and Xuze Zhang for their help in the laboratory. We are grateful to Shuli Liu whose advice improved significantly the data analysis. This study was financially supported by the State Forestry Administration Program (Grant Nos. Y31I351B01), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. Y011331501), the National Science & Technology Pillar Program (Grant Nos. 2008BADB0B0303) and National Basic Research Program of China (Grant Nos. 2010CB530301).

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

  • Ahumada JA, Hurtado J, Lizcano D. Monitoring the status and trends of tropical forest terrestrial vertebrate communities from camera trap data: a tool for conservation. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e73707.
    Bailey LL, MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Cooch E. Advances and applications of occupancy models. Methods Ecol Evol. 2014;5:1269-79.
    Bastianelli G, Wintle BA, Martin EH, Seoane J, Laiolo P. Species partitioning in a temperate mountain chain: segregation by habitat vs. interspecific competition. Ecol Evol. 2017;7:2685-96.
    Bu H, Wang F, McShea WJ, Lu Z, Wang D, Li S. Spatial co-occurrence and activity patterns of mesocarnivores in the temperate forests of Southwest China. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0164271.
    Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol Method Res. 2004;33:261-304.
    Burton CA, Neilson E, Moreira D, Ladle A, Steenweg R, Fisher JT, et al. Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes. J Appl Ecol. 2015;52:675-85.
    Cai DS, Song XJ. Bioresource and protection countermeasure in National Reserve of Chebaling in Guangdong province. Ecol Sci. 2005;24:282-5 (in Chinese).
    Chen YH, Luiselli L. Species richness and co-occurrence patterns of Galliformes in China at three large spatial scales: does scale size matter? Revue D Ecologie. 2009;64:251-60.
    Crowley PH, Cox JJ. Intraguild mutualism. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011;26:627-33.
    D'Amen M, Mod HK, Gotelli NJ, Guisan A. Disentangling biotic interactions, environmental filters, and dispersal limitation as drivers of species co-occurrence. Ecography. 2018;41:1233-44.
    Davies TJ, Meiri S, Barraclough TG, Gittleman JL. Species co-existence and character divergence across carnivores. Ecol Lett. 2007;10:146-52.
    Davis CL, Rich LN, Farris ZJ, Kelly MJ, Di Bitetti MS, Blanco YD, et al. Ecological correlates of the spatial co-occurrence of sympatric mammalian carnivores worldwide. Ecol Lett. 2018;21:1401-12.
    Di Bitetti MS, De Angelo CD, Di Blanco YE, Paviolo A. Niche partitioning and species coexistence in a neotropical felid assemblage. Acta Oecol. 2010;36:403-12.
    Dröge E, Creel S, Becker MS, M'Soka J. Spatial and temporal avoidance of risk within a large carnivore guild. Ecol Evol. 2017;7:189-99.
    Estevo CA, Nagy-Reis MB, Nichols JD. When habitat matters: habitat preferences can modulate co-occurrence patterns of similar sympatric species. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0179489.
    Frey S, Fisher JT, Burton AC, Volpe JP, Rowcliffe M. Investigating animal activity patterns and temporal niche partitioning using camera-trap data: challenges and opportunities. Remote Sens Ecol Conserv. 2017;3:123-32.
    Haynes TB, Schmutz JA, Lindberg MS, Wright KG, Uher-Koch BD, Rosenberger AE. Occupancy of yellow-billed and Pacific loons: evidence for interspecific competition and habitat-mediated co-occurrence. J Avian Biol. 2014;45:296-304.
    HilleRisLambers J, Adler PB, Harpole WS, Levine JM, Mayfield MM. Rethinking community assembly through the lens of coexistence theory. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2012;43:227-48.
    Hubbell SP. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2001.
    Hutchinson GE. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1957;22:415-27.
    Jankowski JE, Robinson SK, Levey DJ. Squeezed at the top: interspecific aggression may constrain elevational ranges in tropical birds. Ecology. 2010;91:1877-84.
    Karanth KU, Srivathsa A, Vasudev D, Puri M, Parameshwaran R, Kumar NS. Spatio-temporal interactions facilitate large carnivore sympatry across a resource gradient. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017. doi: .
    Kendall WL, White GC. A cautionary note on substituting spatial subunits for repeated temporal sampling in studies of site occupancy. J Appl Ecol. 2009;46:1182-8.
    Kraft NJB, Adler PB, Godoy O, James EC, Fuller S, Levine JM, et al. Community assembly, coexistence and the environmental filtering metaphor. Funct Ecol. 2015;29:592-9.
    Kronfeld-Schor N, Dayan T. Partitioning of time as an ecological resource. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2003;34:153-81.
    Kronfeld-Schor N, Visser ME, Salis L, van Gils JA. Chronobiology of interspecific interactions in a changing world. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017. doi: .
    Latif QS, Ellis MM, Amundson CL. A broader definition of occupancy: comment on Hayes and Monfils. J Wildl Manag. 2016;80:192-4.
    Lima SL, Bednekoff PA. Temporal variation in danger drives antipredator behavior: the predation risk allocation hypothesis. Am Nat. 1999;153:649-59.
    Luo G, Yang C, Zhou H, Seitz M, Wu Y, Ran J. Habitat use and diel activity pattern of the Tibetan Snowcock (Tetraogallus tibetanus): a case study using camera traps for surveying high-elevation bird species. Avian Res. 2019;10:4.
    MacKenzie DI, Hines JE. Package.RPresence. R Interface for program PRESENCE. R Package Version 2.12.20. 2018.
    MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Lachman GB, Droege S, Royle JA, Langtimm CA. Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology. 2002;83:2248-55.
    MacKenzie DI, Bailey LL, Nichols JD. Investigating species co-occurrence patterns when species are detected imperfectly. J Anim Ecol. 2004;73:546-55.
    MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Royle JA, Pollock KH, Bailey L, Hines JE. Occupancy estimation and modeling: inferring patterns and dynamics of species cccurrence. San Diego: Elsevier; 2017.
    Mahendiran M. Coexistence of three sympatric cormorants (Phalacrocorax spp.); partitioning of time as an ecological resource. R Soc Open Sci. 2016;3:160175.
    Maphisa DH, Smit-Robinson H, Altwegg R. Dynamic multi-species occupancy models of birds of high altitude grasslands in eastern South Africa. PeerJ Prepr. 2018;6:e26932v1.
    Martin EH, Ndibalema VG, Rovero F. Does variation between dry and wet seasons affect tropical forest mammals' occupancy and detectability by camera traps? Case study from the Udzungwa Mountains, Tanzania. Afr J Ecol. 2017;55:37-46.
    Meredith M, Ridout MS. Estimates of coefficient of overlapping for animal activity patterns. R Package Version 0.3.2. 2018.
    Niedballa J, Sollmann R, bin Mohamed A, Bender J, Wilting A. Defining habitat covariates in camera-trap based occupancy studies. Sci Rep. 2015;5:17041.
    O'Connell AF, Nichols JD, Karanth KU. Camera traps in animal ecology: methods and analyses. New York: Springer; 2010.
    O'Connor KM, Nathan LR, Liberati MR, Tingley MW, Vokoun JC, Rittenhouse TAG. Camera trap arrays improve detection probability of wildlife: investigating study design considerations using an empirical dataset. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0175684.
    Petersen WJ, Savini T, Steinmetz R, Ngoprasert D. Periodic resource scarcity and potential for interspecific competition influences distribution of small carnivores in a seasonally dry tropical forest fragment. Mammal Biol. 2019;95:112-22.
    R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2018. . Accessed 5 Oct 2018.
    Reif J, Reifová R, Skoracka A, Kuczyński L. Competition-driven niche segregation on a landscape scale: evidence for escaping from syntopy towards allotopy in two coexisting sibling passerine species. J Anim Ecol. 2018;87:774-89.
    Rich LN, Miller DAW, Robinson HS, McNutt JW, Kelly MJ. Carnivore distributions in Botswana are shaped by resource availability and intraguild species. J Zool. 2017;303:90-8.
    Richmond OM, Hines JE, Beissinger SR. Two-species occupancy models: a new parameterization applied to co-occurrence of secretive rails. Ecol Appl. 2010;20:2036-46.
    Ridout MS, Linkie M. Estimating overlap of daily activity patterns from camera trap data. J Agric Biol Environ Stat. 2009;14:322-37.
    Rota CT, Wikle CK, Kays RW, Forrester TD, McShea WJ, Parsons AW, et al. A two-species occupancy model accommodating simultaneous spatial and interspecific dependence. Ecology. 2016;97:48-53.
    Rowcliffe JM. Package activity. Animal activity statistics R Package Version 1.1. 2016.
    Rowcliffe JM, Kays R, Kranstauber B, Carbone C, Jansen PA, Fisher D. Quantifying levels of animal activity using camera trap data. Methods Ecol Evol. 2014;5:1170-9.
    Santos F, Carbone C, Wearn OR, Rowcliffe JM, Espinosa S, Lima MGM, et al. Prey availability and temporal partitioning modulate felid coexistence in neotropical forests. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0213671.
    Schuette P, Wagner AP, Wagner ME, Creel S. Occupancy patterns and niche partitioning within a diverse carnivore community exposed to anthropogenic pressures. Biol Conserv. 2013;158:301-12.
    Shu Z, Lyu J, Song X, Huo Z, Chao Z, Chen M, et al. Statistic of the vascular plant specimens from Chebaling National Nature Reserve in Guangdong province. For Environ Sci. 2017;33:61-5 (in Chinese).
    Song XJ, Zou FS. A guide to birds of Chebaling National Nature Reserve. Guangzhou: Guangdong Science and Technology Press; 2017 (in Chinese).
    Steenweg R, Hebblewhite M, Kays R, Ahumada J, Fisher JT, Burton C, et al. Scaling-up camera traps: monitoring the planet's biodiversity with networks of remote sensors. Front Ecol Environ. 2017;15:26-34.
    Sukumal N, Savini T. Altitudinal differences in habitat use by Siamese fireback Lophura diardi and silver pheasant Lophura nycthemera in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. Int J Galliformes. Conserv. 2009;1:18-22.
    Tambling CJ, Minnie L, Meyer J, Freeman EW, Santymire RM, Adendorff J, et al. Temporal shifts in activity of prey following large predator reintroductions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2015;69:1153-61.
    Thakur MP, Wright AJ. Environmental filtering, niche construction, and trait variability: the missing discussion. Trends Ecol Evol. 2017;32:884-6.
    Valeix M, Chamaille-Jammes S, Fritz H. Interference competition and temporal niche shifts: elephants and herbivore communities at waterholes. Oecologia. 2007;153:739-48.
    Webb CO, Ackerly DD, McPeek MA, Donoghue MJ. Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2002;33:475-505.
    Yackulic CB, Reid J, Nichols JD, Hines JE, Davis R, Forsman E. The roles of competition and habitat in the dynamics of populations and species distributions. Ecology. 2014;95:265-79.
    Zhao ZJ. Avifauna of China, volume 1: non-Passerines. Changchun: Jilin Science and Technology Press; 2001 (in Chinese).
    Zheng G. A checklist on the classification and distribution of the birds of China. 3rd ed. Beijing: Science Press; 2017 (in Chinese).
    Zheng G. Pheasants in China. Beijing: Higher Education Press; 2015 (in Chinese).
    Zuckerberg B, Fink D, La Sorte FA, Hochachka WM, Kelling S. Novel seasonal land cover associations for eastern North American forest birds identified through dynamic species distribution modelling. Divers Distrib. 2016;22:717-30.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(11)

    1. Guo Zhong, Longwu Wang, Wei Liang. Recognition and utilization of egg maculation signals by two sympatric host species. Journal of Avian Biology, 2025, 2025(1) DOI:10.1111/jav.03410
    2. Chao Shen, Jiangping Yu, Dake Yin, et al. Bold–shy continuum does not account for egg rejection behaviour in the Japanese tit. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2023, 140(1): 33. DOI:10.1093/biolinnean/blad023
    3. Jianping Liu, Longwu Wang, Wei Liang. Egg rejection and egg recognition mechanism in a Chinese Azure-winged Magpie (Cyanopica cyanus) population. Avian Research, 2023, 14: 100112. DOI:10.1016/j.avrs.2023.100112
    4. Jianping Liu, Laikun Ma, Xiwen Yang, et al. Eggshell spots are an important cue for the egg retrieval behavior in two tit species. Animal Cognition, 2023, 26(5): 1697. DOI:10.1007/s10071-023-01814-w
    5. Nehafta Bibi, Jiangping Yu, Ye Gong, et al. Influence of social context on Cinereous Tit (Parus cinereus) neophobic behavior. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 2022, 134(2) DOI:10.1676/21-00007
    6. Ping Ye, Yan Cai, Jianli Bi, et al. Parasite egg recognition based on multicomponent cues by green-backed tits (Parus monticolus). Avian Biology Research, 2022, 15(1): 53. DOI:10.1177/17581559211066092
    7. Lilly Quach, Audrey E. Miller, Benedict G. Hogan, et al. Egg patterns as identity signals in colonial seabirds: a comparison of four alcid species. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 2021, 336(8): 595. DOI:10.1002/jez.b.22945
    8. Jiangping Yu, Li Zhang, Guodong Yi, et al. Plastering mud around the entrance hole affects the estimation of threat levels from nest predators in Eurasian Nuthatches. Avian Research, 2021, 12(1) DOI:10.1186/s40657-021-00294-1
    9. Longwu Wang, Yu-Cheng Hsu, Wei Liang. Rejection of parasitic eggs by Yellow-bellied Prinias: importance of egg spot location. Journal of Ornithology, 2020, 161(4): 987. DOI:10.1007/s10336-020-01789-2
    10. Donglai Li, Xiaoshuang Li, Yan Zhang, et al. Contrasting effects of egg size and appearance on egg recognition and rejection response by Oriental reed warblers. Ecology and Evolution, 2020, 10(19): 10508. DOI:10.1002/ece3.6707
    11. Jianping Liu, Canchao Yang, Jiangping Yu, et al. Egg recognition and brain size in a cuckoo host. Behavioural Processes, 2020, 180: 104223. DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104223

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Figures(4)  /  Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (525) PDF downloads (8) Cited by(11)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return