Birdsong is an important form of communication that plays an important role in territorial defense and mate attraction by conveying valuable information. While body-size and song frequency are often negatively correlated among species, this relationship is only found in a few songbirds. Previous studies on the Dusky Warbler (Phylloscopus fuscatus) found that there was a positive correlation between tarsus length and peak frequency. And heavier male Dusky Warblers possess better territories and obtain more opportunities for mating; body condition may be related to reproduction of birds, so females may choose heavier mates or better body condition based on the singing characteristics of males.
Methods
We recorded spontaneous song and measured morphology of 33 male Dusky Warblers in Saihanba Forest Farm area between July 5 and August 10, 2015. We chose body weight as an indicator of body size and defined body condition as residuals from a linear regression between body weight and tarsus length. Frist, we used Pearson correlation to analyze whether date and time of day were correlated with weight, and then we used linear regression to analyze whether sound features could indicate the body weight and body condition. We call body weight and body condition the male condition.
Results
We found no effect of date and time of day on weight, and we showed a correlation between the male condition and song features in the small songbird, Dusky Warbler. Maximum trill quality and maximum peak frequency of songs were negatively related to male condition; the mean number of syllables of songs and maximum high frequency of songs were positively correlated with body weight and body condition.
Conclusions
In the small songbird, Dusky Warbler, four song parameters, including maximum trill quality, mean number of syllables of songs, maximum peak frequency of songs, maximum high frequency of songs, significantly predicted male condition change of which the most important song characteristic for male condition was maximum trill quality. This study suggested that the extreme song features were more constrained by male condition than mean sound characteristics.
The main function of sperm is to ensure fertility and enhance paternity. Consequently strong selection acts on both sperm quantity and quality, which favors sperm traits that increase fertilization success (Birkhead and Møller 1998). Sperm motility parameters, the common indicators of sperm quality, are generally assessed to reflect the potential fertility of individuals (Froman et al. 1999; Gasparini et al. 2010).
A method allowing the capture of successive images of spermatozoa and the analysis of their individual movement was first reported by Dott and Foster (1979), and since then, the computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) has been presented and gradually developed as a method to objectively evaluate sperm motility parameters (Amann and Waberski 2014). The system has long been used to diagnose male reproductive system diseases and evaluate the quality of frozen semen used for artificial insemination in animal husbandry (Contri et al. 2010; Broekhuijse et al. 2011), which currently also plays an important role in pet breeding and animal experiments (Lüpold et al. 2009; Guo et al. 2018). However, various factors prevent sperm motility parameters obtained via a CASA system from being compared across studies. Firstly, CASA systems are based on similar principles (Dott and Foster 1979), but their instrument components (e.g. optics and hardware characteristics, as well as algorithms for sperm identification and trajectory reconstruction) and settings (e.g. frame rate and frames per field) highly influence sperm motility parameters (Boryshpolets et al. 2013; Amann and Waberski 2014). In sperm sample preparation, the media used for dilution, sperm sample concentration, temperature and pH should be considered, which can also impact sperm motion characteristics evaluated by a CASA system (Contri et al. 2010; Kathiravan et al. 2011; Humann-Guilleminot et al. 2018). In addition, some factors during analysis procedure such as the number of sperm captured per slide and the technical competence of user are vital for reflecting sperm kinetic characteristics (Broekhuijse et al. 2011; Mortimer and Mortimer 2013). Therefore, although a CASA system can provide an objective assessment of sperm motility parameters, a standardized protocol has now become necessary. With such a standardized protocol, sperm motion characteristics would be accurately reflected and would then permit comparison across systems and groups.
Passerine birds account for over half of avian species, whose sperm generally have a helical shape and a spiraling forward movement (Humphreys 1972) and remain within the sperm storage tubules for a period of days to weeks after copulation (Birkhead and Møller 1998). Postcopulatory sexual selection, including sperm competition and cryptic female choice, is considered to be an important driver of evolutionary change in sperm traits (Birkhead and Møller 1998; Birkhead and Pizzari 2002), however, the sperm characteristics that are closely related to fertilization success have been unclear in passerine birds. Yet there has been a long-term interest in sperm motion characteristics of passerine birds, because faster sperm are presumed to outcompete rival sperms in the "race" to the ovum and more ejaculated motile sperm are likely to increase the odds of sperm from a certain male fertilizing the ovum. In addition, some passerine sperm motility parameters can also be used as indicators of the impact of pollutants in a wide range of species (Møller et al. 2008, 2014; Leidens et al. 2018).
CASA systems have been repeatedly used to assess sperm swimming ability in passerine birds (Lüpold et al. 2009; Bennison et al. 2016), but the procedure conditions have not been standardized thus far. Concerning the temperature at which the sperm movements should be analyzed, some studies assessed sperm motility parameters of passerine birds around body temperature, i.e. 40 ℃, such as in House Sparrows (Passer domesticus, Mora et al. 2017), Azores Bullfinches (Pyrrhula murina, Lifjeld et al. 2013) and Great Tits (Parus major, Losdat and Helfenstein 2018), while others analyzed sperm movement below the bird's body temperature, such as in Eurasian Bullfinches (Pyrrhula pyrrhula) (35 ℃; Birkhead et al. 2006) and Zebra Finches (Taeniopygia guttata) (38 ℃; Bennison et al. 2016). Unfortunately, non-standardized procedure conditions likely affect the reliability of motility parameters detected by a CASA system, which makes it difficult for researchers to compare sperm motion characteristics estimates across time, studies and species.
The aim of this study was to determine the optimal CASA conditions for assessment of sperm kinetic characteristics in Tree Sparrows (Passer montanus) by comparing sperm motility, sperm velocity and sperm movement trajectory at different analysis time, temperatures and pH values. We wish to make recommendations for the standardized estimation of passerine sperm motility parameters using a CASA system that would allow evaluating sperm motion characteristics more accurately and repeatedly.
Methods
Model species
A total of 63 adult Tree Sparrows (11 females and 12 males in 2017, 40 males in 2018) captured with mist nets in May of 2017 and 2018 were used for this study. The sample area, Liujiaxia (35°56′N, 103°15′E) in a northwestern part of China, is a relatively unpolluted village and provides a suitable habitat for Tree Sparrows. Each bird captured was weighed and measured for their wing length and tarsus length, and also sexed based on the presence of a brood patch (Selander and Yang 1966). The body temperature of the adult captured in 2017 was also estimated. On completion, the females were ringed with a uniquely numbered metal band and then released. And males were protected from light and brought back alive to the laboratory, 48 (8 in 2017 and 40 in 2018) of them were used for evaluating sperm motility parameters under different conditions.
The male Tree Sparrows captured in this study were also used for the analysis of several physiological and biochemical indexes and for histology observations. Therefore, these birds were euthanized according to the "Animal Experimental Ethical Inspection Form" (see Additional file 1: Fig. S1), and their seminal glomera were collected conveniently. However, it is to be noted that a non-invasive method to obtain sperm by gently massaging the bird's cloaca works well in passerine birds (Wolfson 1952), and it should be advocated whenever euthanasia is not absolutely necessary.
CASA system
Sperm motility parameters were assessed using the WLJY-9000 (WEI-LI New Century Technical Development, China) device with the standardized 10 μm-depth slide chambers. This system, based on the WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen, has a thermostat that can maintain the temperature from room temperature up to 70 ℃. In addition, the maximum velocity of sperm movement detected by WLJY-9000 is 180 μm/s, up to 20 fields can be captured in each analysis. In each field, 4‒20 frames (20 frames in the present study) were tracked for sperm motility parameters assessment, and no more than 1000 spermatozoa can be identified.
Estimating body temperature
The body temperature of the captured 12 males and 11 females was immediately detected with a UT325 thermometer (Uni-Trend, China). A clean probe was slightly inserted into the cloaca approximately 1 cm deep and removed when the reading was stable.
The test results showed the body temperatures of adult Tree Sparrows were 40.13 ± 1.56 ℃ for male, and 40.38 ± 1.36 ℃ for female. We used these values as bases for exploring the optimal conditions of sperm motility parameters evaluation using the CASA system.
Sperm motility parameters detected by the CASA system
Male Tree Sparrows were acclimatized to the laboratory for 3 h before they were euthanized. Then, they were immediately dissected for a series of experiments, and their right seminal glomus was extracted for obtaining sperm suspension in preheated Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS, an isotonic solution that can buffer pH and preserve the sample's osmotic pressure). Sperm swam out from the seminal glomus into the surrounding media and diffused, forming a "cloud", and in about 10 s the "cloud" diffused completely in the medium. The sperm suspension was then kept warm (at the corresponding analysis temperature) in a water bath until analysis. Next, 10 μL of diluted semen were dropped on the center of the pre-warmed slide chamber and a coverslip was placed over the sample. And the slide was put in the thermostat and sperm motility parameters were assessed by the WLJY-9000 CASA system at 100× magnification. For each analysis, sperm motility parameters were collected and recorded by the capture of at least 5 nonconsecutive fields (a total of at least 500 spermatozoa) within 30 s. The sperm in each field were selected by adjusting the grayscale threshold, and the selected debris and round cells were manually deleted prior to analysis. The following sperm motility parameters were determined: (1) Sperm motility: rapid progressive motility (the percentage of rapid progressive sperm with a linear velocity ≥ 25 μm/s), slow progressive motility (the percentage of slow progressive sperm with a linear velocity < 25 μm/s), non-progressive motility (all other patterns of motility with an absence of progression), immotility (the percentage of immotile sperm). In addition, progressive motility (the sum of rapid and slow progressive motility) is a vital indicator of ejaculated sperm to evaluate their swimming ability (Kathiravan et al. 2011), which was assessed in this study; (2) Sperm velocity: the curvilinear velocity (VCL), straight-line velocity (VSL) and average path velocity (VAP) can be evaluated by the CASA system, and these three sperm velocity parameters were strongly associated with each other (Pearson's r > 0.96, p < 0.001), thus the present study chose VCL, the velocity over the actual sperm trajectory, as a measure of sperm swimming speed (hereafter referred to as sperm velocity); (3) Sperm movement trajectory: path linearity (the linearity of actual sperm track, LIN = VSL/VCL), path wobble (departure of actual sperm track from average path, WOB = VAP/VCL), and path straightness (linearity of the average path, STR = VSL/VAP).
Effect of time since dilution and until analysis on sperm motility parameters
The right seminal glomus of 8 males brought back to the laboratory and euthanized in 2017 was removed and cut in half in 0.5 mL of HBSS, which could keep the sperm concentration between 2 and 50 × 106 sperm/mL (the recommended concentration for sperm motility parameters assessment in WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen). The preheated temperature of HBSS was set to 40 ℃ (the body temperature of Tree Sparrows), and the pH was set to 7.5 (according to the semen pH of poultry) (Orunmuyi et al. 2013) and because weak alkaline pH has shown increased sperm movement (Holm and Wishart 1998). Next, a 10-μL sperm suspension was used for the assessment of the sperm motility parameters by the WLJY-9000 CASA system at 3, 5, 15, 20, and 30 min after dilution.
The initial experiment results showed that the percentage of progressive sperm decreased with time, which largely dropped after 15 min. Based on the results of this first experiment, in 2018, sperm samples of 8 other males were used to assess sperm motility parameters at 1 (the time sperm were suspended fully in medium and load the sperm suspension onto the microscope slides), 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 15 min after dilution in HBSS with pH 7.5 at 40 ℃.
Effect of temperature on sperm motility parameters
We evaluated the effect of the temperature on sperm motion characteristics using sperm samples from 8 males, whose right seminal glomus was divided into 3 equal portions with ophthalmic scissors in 2018. Then, the three pieces were put immediately into different Eppendorf tubes containing 0.2 mL of HBSS with pH 7.5 and placed in a water bath at either 38, 40 or 42 ℃. Approximately 4 min after dilution, motility parameters of sperm from different Eppendorf tubes were analyzed by the WLJY-9000 CASA system at 38, 40 and 42 ℃.
Effect of pH on sperm motility parameters
Based on the semen pH of poultry (Orunmuyi et al. 2013) and previous results in other species (Holm and Wishart 1998), the pH values of HBSS in this experiment were set to three groups (7.0, 7.5 and 8.0 in group 1, 6.0, 7.0 and 7.5 in group 2, and 7.5, 8.0 and 9.0 in group 3) to control the impact of individual variation on the comparison of sperm motility parameters between different pH levels. A total of 24 birds (7 in group 1, 8 in group 2 and 9 in group 3) were used in this experiment, the right seminal glomus of which was divided into 3 equal portions with ophthalmic scissors. Then, the 3 sections were immediately put into Eppendorf tubes containing 0.2 mL of 40 ℃ pre-warmed HBSS with different pH values. Approximately 4 min after dilution, sperm motility parameters were assessed by the WLJY-9000 CASA system at 40 ℃.
Statistical analysis
Experimental data are expressed as mean values ± standard deviation (SD) or ratio. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0 statistical software (IBM SPSS Inc., USA). Two-tailed Pearson correlation analysis was used to check for relationships between sperm velocity parameters. All proportion data including sperm motility and sperm movement trajectory were logit transformed prior to analysis.
The change of sperm motility parameters at different analysis time was investigated using the repeated measures analysis of general linear model (GLM). In order to validate the univariate F-test, the "Epsilon" values (when the Greenhouse-Geisser was > 0.7, the Huynh-Feldt correction should be used, and if not, the Greenhouse-Geisser correction should be used) would be used to calculate an appropriate adjustment to the degrees of freedom when the assumption of sphericity was not met (p < 0.05). Besides, curve fittings were performed using SigmaPlot 14.0 software (Systat Software Inc., USA) to simulate the association between analysis time (independent variable) and sperm motility parameters (dependent variables), and the equations that most closely fit the actual data were found (large coefficient of determination, and p < 0.05).
To investigate the effect of temperature and pH on sperm motility parameters, the univariate analysis of GLM was conducted. The sperm motility parameters entered as dependent variable, while temperature or pH entered as a fixed factor. Besides, male identity was entered as a random factor to control for individual variation, and the time since dilution and until analysis was a covariate.
The model assumptions were validated by testing the residuals' normality, and pairwise comparisons were corrected by the Bonferroni method. Besides, SigmaPlot 14.0 software was also used for bar graphs, line charts and scatter plot.
Results
Effect of time since dilution and until analysis on sperm motility parameters
We found that the amount of time elapsed since dilution until analysis affected the rapid progressive motility, immotility and progressive motility (Table 1), and high correlation coefficients (R2 > 0.93) were observed when sigmoid model and polynomial model were used to calculate the change of these three parameters with time (Fig. 1a, d, e). The lower rapid progressive motility and progressive motility at 13 min (rapid progressive motility: p = 0.02, progressive motility: p = 0.02) and 15 min (rapid progressive motility: p = 0.009, progressive motility: p = 0.009), as well as higher immotility at 15 min (p = 0.02) were detected compared to 1 min (Fig. 1a, d, e). However, the percentages of slow progressive sperm and non-progressive sperm remained statistically unchanged within 15 min after dilution (Fig. 1b, c).
Table
1.
Degrees of freedom, F-values and significance levels denoting the effect of time since dilution and until analysis, temperature and pH on the sperm motility parameters
Dependent variables
Independent variables
Time since dilution and until analysis
Temperature
pH levels
Fdf
p value
Fdf
p value
Fdf
p value
Rapid progressive motility
23.902.16, 15.10
< 0.001
2.242, 13
0.15
12.384, 39
< 0.001
Slow progressive motility
2.061.85, 12.95
0.17
4.562, 13
0.03
0.584, 39
0.68
Non-progressive motility
1.017, 49
0.44
1.462, 13
0.27
0.464, 39
0.76
Immotility
10.857, 49
< 0.001
6.842, 13
0.01
6.274, 39
0.001
Progressive motility
20.192.05, 14.32
< 0.001
4.282, 13
0.04
15.264, 39
< 0.001
Sperm velocity
11.657, 49
< 0.001
0.972, 13
0.41
11.224, 39
< 0.001
LIN
2.392.19, 15.35
0.12
0.232, 13
0.80
10.354, 39
< 0.001
WOB
3.082.34, 16.40
0.07
0.212, 13
0.81
10.494, 39
< 0.001
STR
0.392.82, 19.75
0.75
0.472, 13
0.64
7.294, 39
< 0.001
The details of the building of general linear models are shown in Additional file : Tables S1‒S3 LIN linearity, WOB wobble, STR straightness Italic values are significant in the analysis
Figure
1.
The change of a rapid progressive motility, b slow progressive motility, c non-progressive motility, d immotility and e progressive motility with the time since dilution and until analysis. The blue curves are the regression lines (R2 > 0.93). #p < 0.05 compared to 1 min
The sperm velocity was also influenced by the analysis time (Table 1), which changing pattern followed a sigmoid model (R2 = 0.96). Until 9 min after dilution, the sperm velocity remained significantly unchanged (p > 0.05), which was significantly decreased at 11 min (p = 0.04), 13 min (p = 0.04) and 15 min (p = 0.004) compared to 1 min (Fig. 2a). The study also indicated no significant difference in sperm LIN, WOB and STR across time (Fig. 2b).
Figure
2.
The change of a sperm velocity (blue curve is the regression line, R2 = 0.96) and b sperm movement trajectory with the time since dilution and until analysis. LIN, WOB and STR are the abbreviations of linearity, wobble and straightness, respectively. #p < 0.05 compared to 1 min
Effect of temperature on sperm motility parameters
The rapid progressive motility and non-progressive motility remained statistically unaffected by different temperatures (Table 1). However, temperature affected the percentages of slow progressive sperm, immotile sperm and progressive sperm (Table 1). More slow progressive sperm was found at 38 ℃ compared to 40 ℃ (p = 0.04) and 42 ℃ (p = 0.01) (Fig. 3b). And at 42 ℃, immotility was higher than 40 ℃ (p = 0.003) and progressive motility was lower than 40 ℃ (p = 0.02) and 38 ℃ (p = 0.03) (Fig. 3d, e).
Figure
3.
Effect of temperature on a rapid progressive motility, b slow progressive motility, c non-progressive motility, d immotility and e progressive motility. Different symbols in each column graph denote significant differences between temperature groups (p < 0.05)
In contrast, no significant differences in sperm velocity and sperm movement trajectory were detected across temperatures groups (Fig. 4).
Figure
4.
Effect of temperature on a sperm velocity and b sperm movement trajectory. The gray dots represent samples, and the hollow diamonds represent average values. Abbreviations are the same as those in Fig. 2
The pH significantly affected sperm motility recorded by the WLJY-9000 CASA system, including rapid progressive motility, immotility and progressive motility (Table 1). And these parameters were statistically similar at pH 7.0, 7.5 and 8.0 (p > 0.05) with the exception of lower percentage of progressive sperm at pH 7.0 compared to pH 7.5 (p = 0.04) (Fig. 5a, d, e). In addition, a significant increase in immotility and a significant decrease in rapid progressive motility and progressive motility were observed at pH 6.0 (all p < 0.001 compared to pH 7.5 and pH 8.0) and 9.0 (rapid progressive motility: p = 0.04 compared to pH 7.5 and pH 8.0; progressive motility: p = 0.002 compared to pH 7.5 and p = 0.001 compared to pH 8.0) (Fig. 5a, d, e).
Figure
5.
Effect of pH on a rapid progressive motility, b slow progressive motility, c non-progressive motility, d immotility and e progressive motility. Different symbols in each column graph denote significant differences between pH values (p < 0.05)
Besides, pH also impacted sperm velocity and sperm movement trajectory (Table 1). Sperm velocity in media with pH 7.0, 7.5, 8.0 and 9.0 was statistically similar (p > 0.05), which was statistically higher compared to pH 6.0 (all p < 0.001) (Fig. 6a). Moreover, lower sperm LIN, WOB and STR were observed at pH 6.0 compared to pH 7.0, 7.5, 8.0 and 9.0 (p < 0.047) (Fig. 6b).
Figure
6.
Effect of pH on a sperm velocity and b sperm movement trajectory. Different symbols in each parameter indicate significant differences between pH values (p < 0.05). The gray dots represent samples, and the hollow diamonds represent average values. Abbreviations are the same as those in Fig. 2
CASA systems have been repeatedly used to assess sperm motility parameters of passerine birds in order to explore the evolution of sperm structure and energetics (Rowe et al. 2013; Bennison et al. 2016) or sperm morphology and velocity (Bennison et al. 2014; Rowe et al. 2015; Mora et al. 2017) in relation to sperm competition, or to assess the toxicity of environmental pollutants on sperm quality (Møller et al. 2014). However, inconsistent CASA operations are performed across these studies, which precludes any accurate and repeatable assessment of sperm swimming ability and prevents any comparison within and across species. In this study, three separate experiments were carried out to compare the sperm motility parameters of Tree Sparrow in different conditions, which allowed us to identify optimal analysis time, temperatures and pH for CASA.
Reliable assessments of sperm motility parameters can be performed provided that the extender does not significantly alter the sperm kinetic characteristics over the time period of the analysis (Davis and Katz 1993). In our study, the progressive motility and sperm velocity decreased with time followed a sigmoid model, but all sperm motility parameters remained statistically unchanged within 9 min after dilution in a balanced salt solution, and this period (from 1 min to 9 min after dilution) provides a possibility for obtaining stable assessment of sperm kinetic characteristics in Tree Sparrow. However, other studies on Great Tits, Blue Tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) and Pied Flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca) also show the sperm motile performance declines over time in vitro within about 5 min when sperm stock solution was prepared by a neutral medium, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Cramer et al. 2016a, b), which differs from the findings in our study. Decreased sperm motile performance in birds has been found under the neutral pH conditions (Fig. 5e) or in PBS (Humann-Guilleminot et al. 2018); therefore, the neutral PBS is likely to lead to the short survival of sperm in these studies. Besides, different selection mechanisms of sperm competiton are shown across animal taxa (Birkhead and Møller 1998), and the sperm longevity may be more important for increasing the fertilizing ability of Tree Sparrow compared to the Great Tits, Blue Tits or Pied Flycatchers, so their sperm motility parameters remained longer.
The body temperature of Tree Sparrows that we measured is somewhat on the lower side of the expected mean body temperature of passerine birds (Riley 1937; Binkley et al. 1971; Møller 2010; Skold-Chiriac et al. 2015). It has been reported that the stress caused by capture and detection declined the body temperature of Barn Swallow (Hirundo rustica) and Great Tit (Møller 2010; Andreasson et al. 2019), which may lead to the slightly lower body temperature in Tree Sparrow. After insemination, avian sperm are held in the sperm storage tubules for a period of days to weeks before fertilizing the ova competitively (Birkhead and Møller 1998). Thus, the female reproductive tract provides an optimal environment for sperm motion, and our study likewise showed high sperm kinetic values of Tree Sparrows at their body temperature (40 ℃). Similar to the study about sperm movement of ostriches (Bonato et al. 2012), more slow progressive sperm were observed at low temperatures in the present study. However, the sperm viability of ostriches is unaffected at 20 ℃, and the poor sperm movement at low temperatures is reversible (Bonato et al. 2012). In contrast, we found more immotile sperm at high temperature, which may be related to the damaging effects of high temperature on sperm membrane (Wechalekar et al. 2010) or Na+/K+-ATPase activity (Thundathil et al. 2012). It is also worth noting that sperm motility parameters are sensitive to temperature changes. Low magnitude temperature variations (± 2 ℃) significantly influenced the kinetic parameters in our study, and, as a consequence, strict temperature control during the assessment of sperm motility parameters of passerine birds is key to accurately estimate sperm quality.
Semen of broilers has been shown to be alkaline (Orunmuyi et al. 2013), and in this study, the best sperm movement status was observed at pH 7.5 and 8.0 by comprehensive consideration of sperm motility, sperm velocity and sperm movement trajectory. So, the weakly alkaline environment with a pH close to semen pH is suitable to assess the sperm motility parameters of Tree Sparrow. Similarly, existing research has also shown that sperm movement is stimulated at a certain alkali pH range; for instance, the velocity and total motility of sperm from chickens, turkeys and quails are significantly greater at pH 8.0 compared to pH 7.0, and the sperm velocity is further increased at pH 9.0 for quail and chicken sperm (Holm and Wishart 1998). Ashizawa et al. (1994) found that the increased pH may act directly on axonemal phosphoprotein, mediated by a Ca2+-related substance, which is likely to be a reason why sperm swimming better in the weakly alkaline environment. By contrast, as our study confirms a range of acidic to neutral pH that lead to poor sperm motion (Holm and Wishart 1998; Bonato et al. 2012), which may be related to a reduction in sperm metabolism to conserve energetic resources and promote sperm lifespan (Pinto et al. 1984). In some studies, sperm of passerine birds are suspended by a commercial extender (e.g. Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium) (Lifjeld et al. 2013; Rowe et al. 2013; Mora et al. 2017; Losdat and Helfenstein 2018); however, these neutral media may lead to an underestimate of the sperm kinetic characteristics in passerine birds according to our study.
Conclusions
Our results indicate that the time elapsed since dilution and until analysis, the temperature and the sperm-extender pH all affect sperm motility parameters as computed by the WLJY-9000 CASA system, especially, low magnitude temperature variations (± 2 ℃) can significantly influence the kinetic parameters of Tree Sparrow. We recommend that sperm motility parameters analyses of passerine sperm using a CASA system be performed at 40 ℃ with a pH comprised around 7.5‒8.0 and at 1‒9 min after sperm were suspended in the extender. Under these conditions, the valid motility results will be obtained to reflect sperm swimming ability accurately.
Additional file 2: Table S1. Summary of general linear models examining the effect of time since dilution and until analysis on sperm motility parameters. Table S2. Summary of general linear models examining the effect of temperature on sperm motility parameters. Table S3. Summary of general linear models examining the effect of pH on sperm motility parameters.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Huijie Zhang, Shengnan Wang and Hao Sun for their assistance with fieldwork, and three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.
Authors' contributions
YZ and YY conceived and designed the study. YY, JD, SA, RG, XB and WY conducted the field work. YY and RG carried out the analyses. YY analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript, and YZ revised it. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Tree sparrows were sampled and processed with the permission of Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, China.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ballentine B, Hyman J, Nowicki S. Vocal performance influences female response to male bird song: an experimental test. Behav Ecol. 2004;15:163-8.
Ballentine B. The ability to perform physically challenging songs predicts age and size in male swamp sparrows, Melospiza georgiana. Anim Behav. 2009;77:973-8.
Bertelli S, Tubaro PL. Body mass and habitat correlates of song structure in a primitive group of birds. Biol J Linn Soc. 2002;77:423-30.
Botero CA, Rossman RJ, Caro LM, Stenzler LM, Lovette IJ, De Kort SR, Vehrencamp SL. Syllable type consistency is related to age, social status and reproductive success in the tropical mockingbird. Anim Behav. 2009;77:701-6.
Brumm H. Song amplitude and body size in birds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2009;63:1157-65.
Byers BE. Extra pair paternity in chestnut-sided warblers is correlated with consistent vocal performance. Behav Ecol. 2007;18:130-6.
Byers BE, Akresh ME, King DI. Song and male quality in prairie warblers. Ethology. 2016;122:660-70.
Candolin U, Voigt HR. Correlation between male size and territory quality: consequence of male competition or predation susceptibility? Oikos. 2001;95:225-30.
Cardoso GC, Mamede AT, Atwell JW, Mota PG, Ketterson ED, Price TD. Song frequency does not reflect differences in body size among males in two oscine species. Ethology. 2008;114:1084-93.
Cardoso GC. Paradoxical calls: the opposite signaling role of sound frequency across bird species. Behav Ecol. 2012;23:237-41.
Catchpole CK, Slater PJB. Bird song: biological themes and variations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
Davies NB, Halliday TR. Deep croaks and fighting assessment in toads Bufo bufo. Nature. 1978;274:683-5.
Draganoiu TI, Nagle L, Kreutzer M. Directional female preference for an exaggerated male trait in canary (Serinus canaria) song. Proc R Soc B. 2002;269:2525-31.
Forstmeier W, Kempenaers B, Meyer A, Leisler B. A novel song parameter correlates with extra-pair paternity and reflects male longevity. Proc R Soc B. 2002;269:1479-85.
Forstmeier W, Balsby T. Why mated dusky warblers sing so much: territory guarding and male quality announcement. Behaviour. 2002;139:89-111.
Forstmeier W. Individual reproductive strategies in the dusky warbler (Phylloscopus fuscatus): female and male perspectives. PhD Thesis. Germany: Max-Planck-Forschungsstelle für Ornithologie; 2002.
Galeotti P, Saino N, Sacchi R, Møller AP. Song correlates with social context, testosterone and body condition in male barn swallows. Anim Behav. 1997;53:678-700.
Gil D, Gahr M. The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits [review]. Trends Ecol Evol. 2002;17:133-41.
Handford P, Lougheed SC. Variation in duration and frequency characters in the song of the rufous-collared sparrow, Zonotrichia capensis, with respect to habitat, trill dialects and body size. Condor. 1991;93:644-58.
Hall ML, Kingma SA, Peters A. Male songbird indicates body size with low-pitched advertising songs. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e56717.
Hardouin LA, Reby D, Bavoux C, Bruneleau G, Bretagnolle V. Communication of male quality in owl hoots. Am Nat. 2007;169:552-62.
Hughes M. Size assessment via a visual signal in snapping hrimp. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1996;38:51-7.
Irwin DE, Thimgan MP, Irwin JH. Call divergence is correlated with geographic and genetic distance in greenish warblers (Phylloscopus trochiloides): a strong role for stochasticity in signal evolution? J Evol Biol. 2008;21:435-48.
Ivanitskii VV, Marova IM, Malykh IM. Between order and chaos: contrasting syntax in the advertising song of dusky (Phylloscopus fuscatus) and Radde's (Ph. schwarzi) warblers. J Ornithol. 2012;153:337-46.
Jonart LM, Hill GE, Badyaev AV. Fighting ability and motivation: determinants of dominance and contest strategies in females of a passerine bird. Anim Behav. 2007;74:1675-81.
Jones TM, Ward MP, Benson TJ, Brawn JD. Variation in nestling body condition and wing development predict cause-specific mortality in fledgling dickcissels. J Avian Biol. 2017;48:439-47.
Koivula K, Lahti K, Orell M, Rytkönen S. Prior residency as a key determinant of social dominance in the willow tit (Parus montanus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1993;33:283-7.
Kroodsma DE, Byers BE. The function(s) of bird song. Integr Comp Biol. 1991;31:318-28.
Labocha MK, Hayes JP. Morphometric indices of body condition in birds: a review. J Ornithol. 2012;153:1-22.
Linhart P, Slabbekoorn H, Fuchs R. The communicative significance of song frequency and song length in territorial chiffchaffs. Behav Ecol. 2012;23:1338-47.
Linhart P, Fuchs R. Song pitch indicates body size and correlates with males' response to playback in a songbird. Anim Behav. 2015;103:91-8.
Liu JP. Song and body size of dusk warbler (Phylloscopus fuscatus) at Saihanba in Hebei. Master's Thesis. Baoding, China: Hebei Agricultural University; 2016. (in Chinese)
Liu JP, Zhang ZQ, Gu DH, Ma LK, Hou JH. Song characteristics analysis of the dusky warbler (Phylloscopus fuscatus) at Saihanba in Hebei. Chin J Zool. 2016;51:207-13 (in Chinese).
Liu JP, Ma LK, Zhang ZQ, Gu DH, Wang JJ, Li JJ, Gao LJ, Hou JJ. Maximum frequency of songs reflects body size among male dusky warbler Phylloscopus fuscatus (Passeriformes: Phylloscopidae). Ital J Zool. 2017;84:186-92.
Lu SF, Liu J, Xia CW. Lack of body size and beak length constraints on the frequency of Emberiza godlewskii's song. Chin J Zool. 2014;49:334-40 (in Chinese).
Martens J, Tietze DT, Eck S, Veith M. Radiation and species limits in the Asian Pallas's warbler complex (Phylloscopus proregulus sl). J Ornithol. 2004;145:206-22.
Martin JP, Doucet SM, Knox RC, Mennill DJ. Body size correlates negatively with the frequency of distress calls and songs of neotropical birds. J Field Ornithol. 2011;82:259-68.
Miyashita A, Kizaki H, Sekimizu K, Kaito C. No effect of body size on the frequency of calling and courtship song in the two-spotted cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0146999.
Päckert M, Martens J, Eck S, Nazarenko AA, Valchuk OP, Petri B, Veith M. The great tit (Parus major)—a misclassified ring species. Biol J Linn Soc. 2005;86:153-74.
Patel R, Mulder RA, Cardoso GC. What makes vocalisation frequency an unreliable signal of body size in birds? A study on black swans. Ethology. 2010;116:554-63.
Potvin DA. Larger body size on islands affects silvereye Zosterops lateralis song and call frequency. J Avian Biol. 2013;44:221-5.
Price JJ, Christopher L. Use and characteristics of two singing modes in pine warblers. Wilson J Ornithol. 2013;125:552-61.
Robertson JGM. Male territoriality, fighting and assessment of fighting ability in the Australian frog Uperoleia rugosa. Anim Behav. 1986;34:763-72.
Searcy WA. Morphological correlates of dominance in captive male red winged blackbirds. Condor. 1979;81:417-20.
Searcy WA, Anderson RC, Nowicki S. Bird song as a signal of aggressive intent. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2006;60:234-41.
Sprau P, Roth T, Amrhein V, Naguib M. The predictive value of trill performance in a large repertoire songbird, the nightingale Luscinia megarhynchos. J Avian Biol. 2013;44:567-74.
Tubaro PL, Mahler B. Acoustic frequencies and body mass in New World doves. Condor. 1998;100:54-61.
Xiao H, Zhou ZX, Wang N, Zhang YY. Analyzing song characteristics of Yellow-bellied Tits (Parus venustulus). Zool Res. 2008;29:277-84 (in Chinese).
Wagner WE. Fighting, assessment, and frequency alteration in Blanchard's cricket frog. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1989;25:429-36.
Wallschläger D. Correlation of song frequency and body weight in passerine birds. Experientia. 1980;36:412.
Zheng GM. Ornithology. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press; 2011.
Arda Onur Özkök, Gözde Kılınç. Should Nest Construction Be İntervened İn Domestic Bird Breeding?. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 2025, 10(2): 126.
DOI:10.35229/jaes.1619540
2.
Caide Huang, Zhiqiang Shen, Liang Li, et al. Reproductive damage and compensation of wild earthworm Metaphire californica from contaminated fields with long-term heavy metal exposure. Chemosphere, 2023, 311: 137027.
DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137027
3.
Shengnan Wang, Yingmei Zhang, Wenzhi Yang, et al. Duplicate genes as sources for rapid adaptive evolution of sperm under environmental pollution in tree sparrow. Molecular Ecology, 2023, 32(7): 1673.
DOI:10.1111/mec.16833
4.
Manuela Madeddu, Stefano Marelli, Ahmad Abdel Sayed, et al. Assessment of Sperm Viability and Computer-Assisted Motility Analysis in Budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): Effect of Several In Vitro Processing Conditions. Veterinary Medicine International, 2022, 2022: 1.
DOI:10.1155/2022/5997320
5.
Arda Onur ÖZKÖK. Semen collection from small breed birds and some parameters related to passerine bird semen. International Journal of Science Letters, 2022, 4(1): 220.
DOI:10.38058/ijsl.1052705
6.
Limin Wang, Ghulam Nabi, Liyun Yin, et al. Birds and plastic pollution: recent advances. Avian Research, 2021, 12(1)
DOI:10.1186/s40657-021-00293-2
7.
Ying Yang, Huijie Zhang, Shengnan Wang, et al. Variation in sperm morphology and performance in tree sparrow (Passer montanus) under long-term environmental heavy metal pollution. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2020, 197: 110622.
DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110622
8.
Ying Yang, Wenya Zhang, Shengnan Wang, et al. Response of male reproductive function to environmental heavy metal pollution in a free-living passerine bird, Passer montanus. Science of The Total Environment, 2020, 747: 141402.
DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141402
Table
1.
Degrees of freedom, F-values and significance levels denoting the effect of time since dilution and until analysis, temperature and pH on the sperm motility parameters
Dependent variables
Independent variables
Time since dilution and until analysis
Temperature
pH levels
Fdf
p value
Fdf
p value
Fdf
p value
Rapid progressive motility
23.902.16, 15.10
< 0.001
2.242, 13
0.15
12.384, 39
< 0.001
Slow progressive motility
2.061.85, 12.95
0.17
4.562, 13
0.03
0.584, 39
0.68
Non-progressive motility
1.017, 49
0.44
1.462, 13
0.27
0.464, 39
0.76
Immotility
10.857, 49
< 0.001
6.842, 13
0.01
6.274, 39
0.001
Progressive motility
20.192.05, 14.32
< 0.001
4.282, 13
0.04
15.264, 39
< 0.001
Sperm velocity
11.657, 49
< 0.001
0.972, 13
0.41
11.224, 39
< 0.001
LIN
2.392.19, 15.35
0.12
0.232, 13
0.80
10.354, 39
< 0.001
WOB
3.082.34, 16.40
0.07
0.212, 13
0.81
10.494, 39
< 0.001
STR
0.392.82, 19.75
0.75
0.472, 13
0.64
7.294, 39
< 0.001
The details of the building of general linear models are shown in Additional file : Tables S1‒S3 LIN linearity, WOB wobble, STR straightness Italic values are significant in the analysis
DownLoad:
Email Alerts
RSS Feeds