Citation: | Javier Vidal-Mateo, Marta Romero, Vicente Urios. 2019: How can the home range of the Lesser Kestrel be affected by a large civil infrastructure?. Avian Research, 10(1): 10. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-019-0149-6 |
The loss of traditional agropastoral systems, with the consequent reduction of foraging habitats and prey availability, is one of the main causes for the fast decline of Lesser Kestrel (Falco naumanni). To promote the conservation of the Lesser Kestrel and their habitats, here we studied the foraging activities patterns of this species during the breeding season.
Between 2016 and 2017, we captured and tagged 24 individuals with GPS dataloggers of two colonies in Villena (eastern Spain) with the goals of estimating the home range sizes of males and females, evaluating the differences in spatial ecology between two colonies located in different environments: natural and beside a thermosolar power plant, and investigating habitat selection.
Considering the distances before July 15, date until which it can be assured that the chicks remain in the nest in our colonies, there were significant differences with the distances to the nest in relation to the colony of the individuals: Lesser Kestrels from the thermosolar power plant colony had a greater average distance. The average size of home range areas was 13.37 km2 according to 95% kernel, and there were also significant differences in relation to colony: the individuals from the thermosolar power plant colony used a larger area (22.03± 4.07 km2) than those from the other colony (9.66± 7.68 km2). Birds showed preference for non-irrigated arable lands and pastures.
Despite the differences between the two colonies, the home ranges of both are smaller or similar to those observed in other European colonies. This suggests that Lesser Kestrels continue to have adequate habitats and a good availability of prey. Therefore, the extension and proximity of the plant does not imply a great alteration, which highlights the importance of maintaining the rest of the territory in good conditions to minimize the impact.
Studies show that age at maturity is an important life history trait, which influences bird population dynamics (Sæther et al. 2005). Oriental Storks (Ciconia boyciana) were typically observed to first start breeding at 3 or 4 years of age in Russia (Andronov et al. 2011). However, based on ringing information, one male ringed as a chick was recorded breeding at 2 years of age at Xingkai Lake National Nature Reserve, China, in 1990 (Wang and Yang 1995). In the equivalent species breeding in Europe, White Storks (Ciconia ciconia) were documented as breeding first between one and five years of age (Tortosa et al. 2002), although average age of first breeding age varied between populations and years, ranging from 2.7 to 4.5 (Tortosa et al. 2002). A decrease in the age of first breeding has been noted in some populations, especially in those that are increasing or those with access to good feeding opportunities (Bairlein 1991).
Previously, information on age at first breeding has been collected from long term ringing of chicks as nestlings followed up by resighting the same birds as adults at their own nest sites in subsequent years (Barbraud et al. 1999). While this approach combines the advantages of low cost of rings and large sample size, the disadvantages include its labour intensiveness and the reliance on individuals returning to the monitored parts of the natal area (because an unknown number of individuals may not return to the same study area to start breeding). Technological improvements now enable us to track individual birds in ways that have provided us with valuable insight into many aspects of avian biology (López-López 2016). Here, using GPS/GSM telemetry devices, we reveal new information on the age of first breeding of Oriental Storks breeding in southeast Siberia.
This study was carried out in the middle Heilongjiang-Amur River Basin, mainly in Berezovsky (50.56° N, 127.75° E) and Amursky Wildlife Refuges (49.62° N, 128.29° E) in Amurskaya province, Bastak Nature Reserve (48.87° N, 133.01° E) in the Jewish Autonomous Region, and Khanka Nature Reserve (44.92° N, 132.80° E) in Primorsky province of Russia.
Oriental Storks's nests were located and examined from helicopters or using drones, then age of chicks was determined by site visits allowing individuals to be captured before fledgling. We marked individuals with both a plastic color band and metal ring on tibiotarsus and then attached solar powered GPS-GSM backpack tracker (model OrniTrack-50, Ornitela, Lithuania) to each chick in each study site (For details nest site information, please refer to Additional file 1: Table S1). Devices recorded their latitude and longitude every 10‒20 min. Feather samples were pulled to derive blood traces for subsequent DNA analysis to determine sex of each individual.
We downloaded movement data from all marked individuals and manually inspected their traces to determine whether storks conspicuously began to remain within one restricted area of the summering area, regularly returning to the same point, which would indicate that that individual was building a nest, subsequently visiting these locations for verification of a nesting attempt. Natal dispersal (movement between the places of birth and first breeding) distance was calculated using the "distHaversine" function of the R package "geosphere" (Chernetsov et al. 2006; Hijmans 2019), which calculates the shortest distances using the great circle-distance method to quantify horizontal distance (Hijmans 2019).
We individually marked and tracked 41 Oriental Storks in 2018 of which two showed distinct signs of nesting in May 2020. DNA sex identification showed that they are both male and field inspections confirmed that both of them successfully built nests. Of these, no egg was laid in the nest of the stork tagged with tracker 180467, but the pair including the male with tracker 180458 successfully incubated 4 eggs and fledged 2 chicks in August 2020. The natal dispersal distance of 180467 and 180458 were 388.91 km (natal nest site: 48.87° N, 133.01° E; new built nest site: 50.73° N, 128.43° E) and 86.83 km (natal nest site: 49.63° N, 128.30° E; new built nest site: 50.41° N, 128.31° E), respectively. This is the first solid evidence that male Oriental Storks can successfully reproduce at age 2 years in the wild population. The body weight is 4260.13±82.32 g (Mean±SE, range 3295.00–5235.00 g; N =39), 180467 and 180458 were 4200 g and 3580 g, respectively. The body length is 915.05±16.77 cm (732.00–1150.00 cm; N =37), 180467 and 180458 were 893.00 cm and 1000.00 cm, respectively. The tarsus length is 257.89±4.71 cm (191.00–302.00 cm; N =37), 180467 and 180458 were 268.00 cm and 270.00 cm, respectively. The previous account of a two-year-old male associated with a nest also had a clutch size of four; however, no details were provided to confirm whether eggs were fertilized or if and how many chicks fledged successfully (Wang and Yang 1995).
Oriental Storks differ from White Storks behaviorally, ecologically, and morphologically (being c. 40% heavier Luthin 1987; Fan et al. 2020). The age of first breeding found in this study is earlier than that previously reported (Andronov et al. 2011) and seems to make the Oriental Stork more like White Stork in this trait (which can breed in their second summer Tortosa et al. 2002).
Female White Storks (median 177 km, n =19) bred significantly farther from their natal sites than males (median 15 km, n =25) (Chernetsov et al. 2006). Unfortunately, while we lack data on female Oriental Storks, in these two cases, natal dispersal distance of male Oriental Storks appear greater than those of White Storks in Poland. Given such large scale natal dispersal, searching for nesting birds carrying rings to determine age at first breeding of individuals is likely to be highly ineffective at monitoring true age of first breeding in this population. It is evident that GPS-GSM tracking offers a far more effective method to monitor this parameter in Oriental Storks than traditional means using ringing and resighting, the results of which are likely to be highly biased because of the limited extent of the study area and the number of visited nests.
Numbers of Oriental Storks wintering at Poyang Lake in China were significantly positively correlated with monthly average maximum temperature (Miao et al. 2013), perhaps suggesting that the species prefers high temperatures. Air temperature and precipitation indirectly affect availability of potential food resources, as White Storks were less active in cold and wet weather compared to warm and dry weather in Polish breeding area (Kosicki 2010). In the middle Heilongjiang-Amur River Basin, the mean annual temperature increased significantly, while the annual precipitation has not changed significantly from 1950 to 2010 (Yu et al. 2013). While the frequency of extreme precipitation events did not change significantly, the frequency of extremely low temperature events has also decreased from 1953 to 1995 (Yu et al. 2013). Poor breeding conditions have been observed in other long-lived bird species to lead to individuals delaying maturation (Fjelldal et al. 2020) and Black-legged Kittiwake (Rissa tridactyla) chicks from food-supplemented nests initiated reproduction at younger ages when compared with those recruited from control nests (Vincenzi et al. 2013). Such favorable environmental conditions could potentially promote earlier attainment of suitable body condition and even sexual maturation in Oriental Storks. However, based on such small sample sizes and the implementation of new telemetry methods, we should be prudent about concluding too much from these results as real evidence of a change in age of first breeding in this population compared to earlier years.
In Korea, one female Oriental Stork fed ad libitum in captivity was observed to start to breed at age 3 years, but abandoned its chicks (Cheong et al. 2006). In Shanghai Zoological Park, China, of 119 followed individuals, one male and one female were observed to start to breed at 2 years of age (Wu 2013). In Japan, captive population storks usually start breeding when they are four years old; however, a male of 2 years old in a reintroduced wild population (16 individuals in total) subject to artificial feeding and nest-tower arrangement succeeded in fledging a chick (Ezaki and Ohsako 2012). The on-set of sexual maturity in storks seems to vary between populations in captivity in different regions, but these observations tend to support the hypothesis that the availability of a good and predictable food supply potentially contributes to the explanation for the earlier start of reproduction.
Since the beginning of the twenty-first century, the Oriental Stork has expanded its breeding area southward dramatically. The species is now occur as summer residents and can be found breeding around Poyang Lake, Wuchang Lake and the Yellow River Delta which used to be their wintering areas or stopover sites (He et al. 2008; Chen et al. 2010; Xue et al. 2010). The species is also increasingly selecting power-line poles, artificial poles and pylons as their nest-sites (Chen et al. 2010, 2020).
Poaching and habitat loss has been put forward as the main reason for the decline in global abundance of the Oriental Stork (Murata 1997). Besides the degradation of wetlands on the breeding areas, wintering areas and stopover sites (Wei et al. 2016; Zheng et al. 2016; Sun et al. 2020), nest-site loss may also be one of the principal forms of "habitat" loss restricting expansion in the breeding population size. Oriental Storks prefer tall natural trees with broad, dense canopies that can support their huge nests (Wang and Li 2006). Widespread deforestation since the middle of the twentieth century makes such trees extremely rare in area close to wetlands in Northeast China (Zheng et al. 2016). Just as the abundance of cavity-nesting bird species can be limited well below potential carrying capacity by lack of natural holes in young even aged tree stands (Wiebe 2011), Oriental Storks may suffer from a similar limitation by lack of suitable nest sites despite an abundance of suitable feeding habitats on the wetlands. The rapid uptake and successful use of artificial nest sites following their provision supported a major increase in breeding Oriental Stork abundance at Honghe National Nature Reserve (Li 1995; Zhu et al. 2008), a case that provides evidence that the number of breeding pairs was limited by availability of nest-sites, indicating that, at least at local scales, nest-sites may be limited. In Russia, the provision of artificial nest platforms also led to their rapid uptake, followed by an increase in local abundance in most refuges and reserves of the region (Averin and Panin 2011; Sasin 2011).
Despite limited sample size, the use of new technology in this case was critical to our ability to confirm the early attempt at reproduction in these two individuals, which provides new insights into the population dynamics of this species. The recent increase of Oriental Storks populations is thought to be partly explained by the effect of prohibition wetland reclamation and construction of artificial nests (Zheng et al. 2016). However, ultimate driver of recent changes in abundance remains poorly known. Through our use of tracking devices, we have the ability to track the age of first breeding of other individuals from the same cohort over many years to derive a frequency distribution of age at first breeding, which over time will also give insights into any changes in this parameter and potential reasons for such change. We must become more innovative in the ways in which we integrate such developing remote sensing and technologies into our regular monitoring of long term population dynamics of critical and threatened species.
The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-021-00301-5.
Additional file 1: Table S1. Natal nest site of tagged Oriental Stork in 2018 at the middle Heilongjiang-Amur River Basin.
We are grateful to professor Anthony David Fox and Lei Cao for their comments and language polishing. Field work, including nest searches and GPS/GSM tracking of Oriental stork in Amur Ecoregion in Russia was undertaken under the Memorandum of Understanding regarding the collaboration on waterbirds tracking project signed between The Research Center for EcoEnvironmental Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Honghe Nature Reserve, The Coordination Council of the Directors of Nature Reserves of the southern Far East, The United Directorate "ZapovednoyePriamurye" and WWF Russia Amur branch. We thank all staff of these institutes involved for their invaluable assistance in field work.
AS and QZ conceived this study. AS and QZ wrote the paper. AS, ASe, ZB and QZ performed the experiments, analyzed the data, did the fieldwork. All authors contributed critically to the drafts and revised the drafts. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to the fact that Oriental Storks in this flyway are highly threatened by illegal hunting, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
The Federal Service for Technical and Export Control and The Coordination Council of the Directors of Nature Reserves of southern Far East of Russia (No.332) approved the attachments of the transmitters and field methods used in this study.
Not applicable.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Alberdi M. Actuaciones del plan de acción para la conservación de las aves de las estepas cerealistas de la Comunidad Valenciana. Informe inédito. Equipo de Seguimiento de Fauna-VAERSA. Valencia: Consellerıa de Territorio y Vivienda; 2006.
|
Cody M. Habitat selection in birds. London: Academic Press; 1985.
|
Cramp S, Simmons KEL. Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa; The birds of the Western Palaearctic. New York: Oxford University Press; 1980.
|
Clere E, Bretagnolle V. Food availability for birds in farmland habitats: biomass and diversity of arthropods by pitfall trapping technique. Rev Ecol. 2001;56:275-97.
|
Franco A, Andrada J. Alimentación y selección de presa en Falco naumanni. Ardeola. 1977;23:137-87.
|
García J. Dispersión premigratoria del cernícalo primilla Falco naumanni en España. Ardeola. 2000;47:197-202.
|
Hooge PN, Eichenlaub B. Animal movement extension for ArcView. U.S.A.: Alaska Science Center, Biological Science Office, U.S. Geological Survey, Anchorage, AK; 1997.
|
Kenward RE. A manual for wildlife radio tagging. London: Academic Press; 2001.
|
Lepley M, Brun L, Foucart A, Pilard P. Régime et comportament alimentaires du Faucon Crécerellette Falco naumanni, en Crau en période de reproduction et post-reproduction. Alauda. 2000;68:177-84.
|
Manly BFJ. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. 2nd ed. London: Chapman & Hall; 1997.
|
Negro JJ. Falco naumanni Lesser Kestrel. In: Snow DW, Perrins CM, editors. The birds of Western Palearctic: update. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997. p. 49-56.
|
Rocha PA. Dieta e comportamento alimentar do Peneireiro-de-dorso-liso Falco naumanni. Airo. 1998;9:40-7.
|
Silverman BW. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. London: Chapman and Hall; 1986.
|
Smallwood JA. The relationship of vegetative cover to daily rhythms of prey consumption by american kestrels wintering in southcentral Florida. J Raptor Res. 1988;22:77-80.
|
Tella JL, Hiraldo F, Donázar JA, Negro JJ. Costs and benefits of urban nesting in the Lesser Kestrel. In: Bird D, Varland D, Negro JJ, editors. Raptors in human landscapes: adaptions to built and cultivated environment. London: Academic Press; 1996. p. 53-60.
|
Tellería JL, Santos T, Álvarez G, Sáez-Royuela C. Avifauna de los campos de cereales del interior de España. In: Bernis F, editor. Aves de los medios urbano y agrícola en las mesetas españolas. Madrid: SEO; 1988. p. 173-319.
|
Toland BR. The effect of vegetative cover on foraging strategies, hunting success and nesting distribution of American kestrels in central Missouri. J Raptor Res. 1987;21:14-20.
|
Tucker GM, Heath MF. Birds in Europe: their conservation status. Conservation Series 3. Cambridge: BirdLife International; 1994.
|
Wiens JA. Habitat selection in variable environments: shrub-steppe birds. In: Cody ML, editor. Habitat selection in birds. Orlando: Academic Press; 1985. p. 227-51.
|
Wiens JA. The ecology of bird communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989.
|
1. | David J. Kavana, Yuchen Wang, Guocan Zhang, et al. Spatio-temporal analysis of habitat suitability for the endangered oriental white stork (Ciconia boyciana) in the wetland ecosystem of northeast China. Journal for Nature Conservation, 2024, 82: 126760. DOI:10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126760 |
2. | Xinyu Liu, Ye Zhao, Lin Fan. Constructing habitat networks to protect endangered migratory birds in the Jiaozhou Bay area. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03380 |