Processing math: 100%
Xiaodan Wang, Fenliang Kuang, Kun Tan, Zhijun Ma. 2018: Population trends, threats, and conservation recommendations for waterbirds in China. Avian Research, 9(1): 14. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-018-0106-9
Citation: Xiaodan Wang, Fenliang Kuang, Kun Tan, Zhijun Ma. 2018: Population trends, threats, and conservation recommendations for waterbirds in China. Avian Research, 9(1): 14. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-018-0106-9

Population trends, threats, and conservation recommendations for waterbirds in China

Funds: 

This study was fnancially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China 31572280

This study was fnancially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China 31071939

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Ma Zhijun, zhijunm@fudan.edu.cn

  • Received Date: 16 Jan 2018
  • Accepted Date: 10 Apr 2018
  • Available Online: 24 Apr 2022
  • Publish Date: 27 Apr 2018
  • Background 

    China is one of the countries with abundant waterbird diversity. Over the past decades, China’s waterbirds have suffered increasing threats from direct and indirect human activities. It is important to clarify the population trends of and threats to waterbirds as well as to put forward conservation recommendations.

    Methods 

    We collected data of population trends of a total of 260 waterbird species in China from Wetlands International database. We calculated the number of species with increasing, declining, stable, and unknown trends. We collected threatened levels of waterbirds from the Red List of China’s Vertebrates (2016), which was compiled according to the IUCN criteria of threatened species. Based on literature review, we refined the major threats to the threatened waterbird species in China.

    Results 

    Of the total 260 waterbird species in China, 84 species (32.3%) exhibited declining, 35 species (13.5%) kept stable, and 16 species (6.2%) showed increasing trends. Population trends were unknown for 125 species (48.1%). There was no significant difference in population trends between the migratory (32.4% decline) and resident (31.8% decline) species or among waterbirds distributed exclusively along coasts (28.6% decline), inland (36.6% decline), and both coasts and inland (32.5% decline). A total of 38 species (15.1% of the total) were listed as threatened species and 27 species (10.8% of the total) Near Threatened species. Habitat loss was the major threat to waterbirds, with 32 of the total 38 (84.2%) threatened species being affected. In addition, 73.7% (28 species), 71.1% (27 species), and 57.9% (22 species) of the threatened species were affected by human disturbance, environmental pollution, and illegal hunting, respectively.

    Conclusions 

    We propose recommendations for waterbird conservation, including (1) strengthening conservation of nature wetlands and restoration of degraded wetlands, (2) enhancing public awareness on waterbird conservation, (3) improving the enforcement of Wildlife Protection Law and cracking down on illegal hunting, (4) carrying out long-term waterbird surveys to clarify population dynamics, (5) restoring populations of highly-threatened species through artificial intervention, and (6) promoting international and regional exchanges and cooperation to share information in waterbirds and their conservation.

  • Natural wetlands are facing global pressure with increasing anthropogenic activities and environmental changes (Ma et al., 2004; Kloskowski et al., 2009; Davidson, 2014). Almost half of the natural wetlands worldwide have been lost, degraded, or transformed in the last century (Ma et al., 2004, 2010). As a consequence, waterbirds are under great threats due to their dependency on wetland habitats (Ma et al., 2010). Over 20% of waterbird species have experienced rapid population declines and approximately 19% of the species have been recognized as threatened species by the IUCN (the International Union for Conservation of Nature; Wang et al., 2018).

    With the progressive loss and extensive degradation of natural wetlands, waterbirds have been found to use various artificial wetlands as complementary habitats, such as reservoirs, aquaculture ponds, and paddy fields (Ma et al., 2010; Giosa et al., 2018; Rajpar et al., 2022). These artificial wetlands are often created or greatly modified by humans, but can still contribute to biodiversity conservation (Ma et al., 2010; Li et al., 2019a). Although previous studies suggested that created wetlands could serve as compensatory or alternative habitats for waterbirds, some critics argue that the intensive anthropogenic disturbances might cause more threats to waterbirds in these artificial wetlands than in natural ones (Tourenq et al., 2001; Ma et al., 2010). The debate is continuing and has not been settled, and these man-made wetlands are attracting increasing number of waterbirds. Due to the high sensitivity of waterbirds in these complex human-dominated environments, more research is required to better understand how waterbird assemblages respond to the dramatic environmental changes in artificial wetlands which are increasing at the global scale.

    Waterbirds require suitable habitats with sufficient resources under appropriate conditions, and some species can move quickly over large distances, responding to environmental changes in wetlands at multiple levels (Henry and Cumming, 2017). A variety of environmental factors, such as wetland size, aquatic vegetation, water depth and quality, have been found to influence reproduction, growth, survival and behaviour of waterbirds (Ma et al., 2010; Lantz et al., 2011). The effects of environmental changes might be species-specific and may ultimately result in changes in waterbird populations and communities (Ma et al., 2010; Tavares et al., 2015). For example, global wetland loss and degradation have led to population declines of many waterbirds species (Wang et al., 2022). Local environmental changes can also immediately result in changes in species diversity and compositions of waterbird communities (Cintra, 2019; Li et al., 2021a,b). Understanding the underlying ecological processes of the environmental effects on changes of waterbird communities can provide important insights for waterbird conservation. Furthermore, compared to natural wetlands, environmental changes in artificial wetlands are more dramatic and their influence on waterbirds should be given particular attention.

    Artificial wetlands are quite diverse and comprise many types, such as paddy fields and agricultural ponds (Jackson et al., 2020). As a special type of artificial wetlands, subsidence wetlands created by mining activities are expanding and attracting increasing attention on the effects of these human-induced landscape modifications on wildlife. Previous studies investigating biotic communities in subsidence wetlands focused on taxa with low movement capacities, such as benthos and planktons (Bielańska-Grajner and GŁadysz, 2010; Lewin et al., 2015). However, there have been few studies investigating the responses of waterbirds which have high movement capacities and can respond quickly to environmental changes in these artificial wetlands. As one of the largest coal production and consumption countries in the world, total coal production in China was about 3.9 ​× ​109 tonnes in 2013, almost half of the global total production (Wang et al., 2019). More than 90% of this coal was produced by underground extraction, causing land destruction and subsidence (Zhang et al., 2019). It was estimated that the area of subsidence land caused by underground coal mining approached 2 ​× ​104 ​km2 in 2018 in China (Hu and Guo, 2018). In the North China Plain, large subsidised areas have been waterlogged and transformed into wetlands under influence of rainfall and rising groundwater levels (Meng et al., 2009). In the context of loss and degradation of natural wetlands, these newly unintended man-made wetlands have been found to provide habitats for a wide range of waterbirds, particularly migratory birds from the East Asian–Australasian Flyway (Li et al., 2019a). These waterbirds are strongly affected by local environmental conditions, providing an opportunity to explore how waterbirds adapt to the intensive environmental changes in artificial wetlands (Li et al., 2019b). A previous study found that the spatial variation in community structure was mainly caused by species replacement rather than nestedness, and attributed this variation to environmental changes and species' high dispersal capacities (Li et al., 2021a,b). Due to intensive human activities, subsidence wetlands have experienced large environmental changes at various scales (Li et al., 2019a). However, no study has investigated how waterbird communities respond to temporal changes in environmental variables, and which process contributes more to the temporal variation in community structure.

    In this study, we quantified the temporal changes in the breeding waterbird communities from 2016 to 2021 across subsidence wetlands in the Huainan coal mining area in the North China Plain, and analyzed the effects of changes in environmental variables. Specifically, we carried out field surveys for waterbirds and environmental factors across 20 subsidence wetlands in the breeding seasons of 2016 and 2021. The differences in the number of waterbird individuals, species diversity and community composition between the two years were tested and related to temporal changes in environmental variables. We expected that changes in environmental condition (e.g., increase in wetland size, or human disturbance) would result in changes in community indices (number of individuals, species richness, Shannon–Wiener diversity and Pielou evenness) of these waterbird species, especially due to changes in individual numbers of a few dominant species. We also quantified and decomposed the temporal pairwise β-diversity to analyse the underlying process of temporal shifts in waterbird assemblage structure (Baselga, 2010; Baselga et al., 2015). We hypothesized that the temporal pairwise β-diversity would be dominated by species turnover rather than nestedness due to birds' strong dispersal capacity and environmental changes. This study is expected to generate new insights into how waterbird communities respond to habitat changes in artificial wetlands, and provide important implications for improving management and conservation plans.

    We carried out this study in the Huainan coal mining area (32.71°–32.88° N, 116.22°–116.88° E), which is situated in the south of the North China Plain (Fig. 1). The area is dominated by flat agricultural lands with an average elevation of 30 ​m above sea level (Li et al., 2019c). It has a typical temperate monsoon climate, with an average annual temperature of 14.7 ​℃ and an average annual precipitation of 933 ​mm. The rainy season is from April to August.

    Figure  1.  Field survey sites of waterbirds and land cover characteristics surrounding the subsidence wetlands in the Huainan coal mining area. B and C are the land cover maps of 2021 and 2016, respectively.

    As one of the 14 largest coal resource bases in China, the Huainan coal mining area has a long history of underground coal excavation activities (Château et al., 2019). The massive underground coal mining has resulted in large-scale land destruction and subsidence, which was estimated to approach 350 ​km2 by 2020 (Liu et al., 2021). Due to abundant rainfall and increasing water table, over half of the subsidence area has been flooded with a mean water depth of 3.48 ​m (Ouyang et al., 2018), creating dozens of wetlands. Along with the change from a terrestrial agriculture landscape to a wetland ecosystem, the subsidence wetlands have been providing habitats for diverse aquatic organisms and waterbirds (Li et al., 2019a). Because the subsidence wetlands are recognized as unintended artificial wetlands, extensive economic activities occur inside and surrounding the wetlands, including aquaculture and photovoltaic power generation.

    We carried out waterbird surveys in 20 randomly selected subsidence wetlands across the Huainan coal mining area (Fig. 1). To obtain a complete view of present waterbirds in each wetland, one to four counting points were placed along its boundary, depending on its area, shape and visibility. The observation radius at each point was shorter than 1 ​km and observation areas did not overlap to eliminate double-counting.

    Two field surveys were conducted on sunny and windless days in early July and August of 2016 and 2021. During each survey, the same experienced bird observers used binoculars (10 ​× ​42 WB Swarovski) and a telescope (20–60 ​× ​zoom Swarovski: ATM 80) to observe waterbirds at the fixed counting points within 20 ​min. The 'look-see' counting method was employed to record all waterbirds that occurred within the observation areas, including those flushing within the boundaries, while excluding those flying over from outside (Delany, 2005). A community was defined as a combination of all waterbirds recorded within a wetland in a year. Based on the similarity in resources sharing and exploitation ways (Blondel, 2003), the waterbirds were grouped into different guilds: ducks (Anatidae), dividing birds (grebes), vegetation gleaners (jacanas and gallinules), gulls, shorebirds (Charadriidae and Scolopacidae) and large waders (herons and egrets) (Appendix Table S1; nomenclature and residence types follow MacKinnon et al. (2022)).

    A total of 12 environment variables were measured to analyze their potential influences on the changes in waterbird community structure (Table 1). Among these variables, density of discarded houses, area proportions of floating photovoltaic panels, aquatic vegetation and aquaculture enclosures in each wetland, and the shortest distance from the boundary of each wetland to main settlements (> 50 ​ha) and roads were determined with the assistance of high-resolution Google Earth maps combined with field investigations. Wetland age was defined as the time (years) since the wetland's creation, determined by detecting their occurrences in a series of Landsat images acquired every month from 1987 to 2021. The remaining variables (area of open water, perimeter of wetland, total area of settlements (> 10 ​ha) and wetlands (> 1 ​ha) within a 5-km buffer zone surrounding each wetland) were measured based on the land cover map obtained from an image classification (see below).

    Table  1.  The descriptions and temporal changes of the 12 environmental variables in the 20 subsidence wetlands in the Huainan coal mining area.
    Variables Description Mean ± standard deviation (Range) Significance of comparisons
    2016 2021
    AW (km2) Area of water in each wetland 1.61 ± 1.87
    (0.22–8.53)
    1.49 ± 1.63
    (0.07–7.01)
    t = −0.75, P = 0.461
    PW (km) Perimeter of each wetland 5.91 ± 2.86
    (2.43–14.38)
    7.07 ± 3.26
    (2.66–15.59)
    t = 5.17, P < 0.001
    SI Shape index of each wetland. SI = L/2 π ×A (L = wetland perimeter; A = wetland area) 1.34 ± 0.17
    (1.11–1.64)
    1.47 ± 0.22
    (1.15–1.85)
    t = 4.53, P < 0.001
    PV (%) Area proportion of aquatic vegetation in each wetland 23.01 ± 14.05
    (5.78–65.75)
    19.96 ± 8.60
    (7.85–35.55)
    t = −0.59, P = 0.258
    PP (%) Area proportion of floating photovoltaic panels in each wetland 0 0.10 ± 0.17
    (0–0.46)
    t = 2.64, P = 0.016
    Age (years) Years since wetland creation 12.57 ± 6.53
    (3.22–24.48)
    17.57 ± 6.53
    (8.22–29.48)
    t = 365.73, P < 0.001
    DD (ind./km2) Density of discarded houses within each wetland 11.09 ± 17.89
    (0–69.61)
    4.60 ± 5.91
    (0–19.69)
    t = −1.86, P = 0.078
    DS (km) Shortest distance from the boundary of each wetland to settlement > 50 ha 0.73 ± 0.47
    (0.12–1.97)
    0.65 ± 0.37
    (0.18–1.56)
    t = −1.34, P = 0.195
    DR (km) Shortest distance from the boundary of each wetland to the nearest main road 0.22 ± 0.30
    (0–1.16)
    0.15 ± 0.24
    (0–0.82)
    t = −1.62, P = 0.122
    TS (km2) Total area of settlements (> 10 ha) within a 5-km buffer zone surrounding each wetland 19.45 ± 5.80
    (9.17–19.19)
    18.59 ± 5.19
    (10.42–29.16)
    t = −0.88, P = 0.388
    TW (km2) Total area of wetlands (> 1 ha) within a 5-km buffer zone surrounding each wetland 6.66 ± 2.98
    (2.07–12.06)
    7.32 ± 2.59
    (2.59–12.69)
    t = 1.51, P = 0.149
    PA (%) Area proportion of aquaculture enclosures in each wetland 0.01 ± 0.02
    (0–0.06)
    0.12 ± 0.16
    (0–0.49)
    t = 3.18, P = 0.005
    Variables with significant differences between 2016 and 2021 are highlighted in bold (paired t-test, n = 20).
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    To obtain land cover maps of the subsidence wetlands and surrounding areas, a cloud-free Landsat 8 image (Level 1T of Landsat 8 OLI on path 122/row 37; http://glovis.usgs.gov) acquired on 1 August 2016 and 31 August 2021 were interpreted. Before image classifications, radiometric calibration and atmospheric correction were performed on the Landsat-8 images, which were then re-projected to the Universal Transverse Mercator Project 1984 coordinate system, zone 50 (north). The Maximum Likelihood Classification technique in ENVI 5.3 (Exelis VIS, Inc.) was used for supervised classification of the images. Six land cover types were identified, i.e., open water, floating photovoltaic panels, aquatic vegetation, developed land, woodland, and farmland. We selected 100 training samples through sub-setting the region of interest for each land cover, and then compared them with 100 samples of known cover (acquired by field surveys and Google Earth maps) to validate the classifications. The overall accuracy and the Kappa coefficients based on the confusion matrix were employed to assess the classification accuracy (Brandt et al., 2013). Both values were greater than 80%, implying high classification accuracy.

    For each surveyed wetland, we pooled the number of bird individuals of the two surveys in 2016 and 2021, respectively, to obtain one species ​× ​sites matrix in each year. We calculated dominant values (Y; Eq. (1)) to determine dominant species across the 20 wetlands in 2016 and 2021, respectively (Xu et al., 1995; Sun et al., 2006).

    Y=niNi×fi
    (Eq. 1)

    where ni is the number of individuals of species i, Ni is the total number of waterbird individuals, and fi is the ratio of wetlands with species i in one year.

    For each wetland in each year, species richness (SR), Shannon–Wiener diversity index (H; Eq. (2)) and Pielou evenness index (J; Eq. (3)) (Pielou, 1966; Ludwig and Reynolds, 1988) were calculated to measure species diversity of communities.

    H=si=1PilnPi
    (Eq. 2)
    J=H/lnS
    (Eq. 3)

    where Pi is the individual number proportion of species i, and S is the total number of individuals of species in one wetland. Paired t-tests were used to examine whether there were differences in diversity indices, environmental variables and number of individuals in each guild between 2016 and 2021. The changes in the number of individuals of a species with more than three records over the five years were tested using paired Wilcoxon signed-ranks tests. The environmental variables with significant changes were z-score standardized prior to further analyses.

    Multi-Response Permutation Procedures (MRPP; McCune et al., 2002) were used to test the overall changes in species compositions from 2016 to 2021. The MRPP is a group of distance-based statistical tests, and evaluates the difference between two or more groups of entities. We used the Bray-Curtis distance matrix, calculated using the abundance data, to run the MRPP with 999 permutations. The Non-metric Multi-Dimensional Scaling (NMDS; Kruskal, 1964) ordination was used to visualize compositional changes over the five years. The method is an indirect gradient analysis based on the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrix using bird abundance data. Similarity percentage analysis (SIMPER; Clarke, 1993) was used to identify the species that contributed most to the overall changes in community composition.

    The data of waterbird and environmental factors in 2016 and 2021 were combined and general linear mixed models (GLMMs) were used to test for effects of environmental variables on species richness, Shannon–Wiener index, Pielou index, total numberof individuals, number of individuals of each guild, and species contributing most to the overall compositional dissimilarity over the five years (determined by SIMPER analysis). The environmental factors with significant changes over the five years (PW, SI, PP, Age and PA) were included as the fixed effects, and the wetland ID as random effect. We tested for multicollinearity between environmental variables using the variance inflation factor (VIF), and all variables were retained in the models because all VIF values were smaller than five (Akinwande et al., 2015).

    Temporal pairwise β-diversity (here measured as Sørensen dissimilarity, βsor; Eq. (4)) was calculated and decomposed for each wetland to analyse the underlying ecological processes shaping the changes in species compositions from 2016 to 2021. The calculations were based on the presence/absence data of the waterbird communities, and the decompositions ((Eq. (5) and (6)) followed Baselga (2010). By this means, the relative contribution of species turnover (βsim) and nestedness (βsne) to the temporal compositional changes was determined using β-diversity ratio (βsne/βsor, βratio) (Si et al., 2015).

    βsor=b+c2a+b+c
    (Eq. 4)
    βsim=min(b,c)a+min(b,c)
    (Eq. 5)
    βsne=βsorβsim=|bc|2a+b+c×aa+min(b,c)
    (Eq. 6)

    where a is the number of species recorded in one wetland in both years, b is the number of species present in 2016 but not in 2021, and c is the number of species in 2021 but not in 2016. The temporal pairwise β-diversity varied from 0 to 1, implying increasing dissimilarity between two years for a certain wetland.

    The R (v. 4.1.2; R Core Team, 2020) package vegan was used to perform the MRPP, NMDS, GLMMs, and the calculations and decompositions of the temporal pairwise β-diversities. Data are shown as mean ​± ​standard deviation (SD), and statistical significance level was P ​ < ​0.05.

    The wetland age, wetland perimeter, shape index, and the area proportion of floating photovoltaic panels and aquaculture enclosures of most wetlands increased from 2016 to 2021 (Table 1). There were no differences in other variables between the two years.

    In total, we recorded 1740 waterbirds of 26 species belonging to 9 families and 5 orders in 2016, and 2951 individuals of 23 species belonging to 10 families and 5 orders in 2021 (Appendix Table S2). The communities in 2016 were dominated by Nycticorax nycticorax, Tachybaptus ruficollis, and Gallinula chloropus, while those in 2021 were dominated by Chlidonias hybrida, Gallinula chloropus, and Egretta garzetta (Table 2). During the surveys, we recorded one species listed as Key Protected Wild Animal Species in China (Class Ⅱ), i.e. Hydrophasianus chirurgus in both years.

    Table  2.  Number of individuals per bird species, and species relative contribution, occurrence frequency, and dominance in the waterbird communities across the subsidence wetlands in the Huainan coal mining area in 2016 and 2021.
    Dominant species Number of individuals (n) Relative proportion (%) Occurrence frequency (%) Dominance value (Y)
    2016
    Nycticorax nycticorax 426 24.5 85.0 0.208
    Tachybaptus ruficollis 229 13.2 100.0 0.132
    Gallinula chloropus 180 10.3 100.0 0.103
    Chlidonias hybrida 165 9.5 85.0 0.081
    Egretta garzetta 144 8.3 70.0 0.058
    Ardeola bacchus 85 4.9 95.0 0.046
    Podiceps cristatus 106 6.1 55.0 0.034
    Charadrius dubius 87 5.0 65.0 0.033
    Ixobrychus sinensis 69 4.0 75.0 0.030
    Bubulcus ibis 104 6.0 35.0 0.021
    2021
    Chlidonias hybrida 809 27.4 100.0 0.274
    Gallinula chloropus 438 14.8 100.0 0.148
    Egretta garzetta 389 13.2 95.0 0.125
    Tachybaptus ruficollis 290 9.8 100.0 0.098
    Nycticorax nycticorax 164 5.6 70.0 0.039
    Ardeola bacchus 117 4.0 90.0 0.036
    Podiceps cristatus 110 3.7 65.0 0.024
    Bubulcus ibis 121 4.1 55.0 0.023
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    For individual wetlands, the total number of waterbird individuals, species richness and number of vegetation gleaners and gulls increased by 71.7%, 20.1%, 140.1% and 403.5%, respectively, while the number of other guilds, Shannon–Wiener diversity and Pielou evenness did not differ over these five years (Table 3; Fig. 2). The total number of waterbird individuals and the number of vegetation gleaners and gulls in individual wetlands increased with the area proportion of aquaculture, while shorebirds were more abundant in wetlands formed earlier (Table 4). Among the 16 species with more than three records, Egretta garzetta, Gallinula chloropus, Chlidonias hybrida, Fulica atra and Ardea alba increased and Charadrius dubius decreased in numbers over the five years (Appendix Table S3). No environmental factors could explain the variations in species richness, Shannon–Wiener index and Pielou index in individual wetlands.

    Table  3.  Species richness, total number of waterbirds and species diversity and evenness of the waterbird communities across subsidence wetlands in Huainan coal mining area in 2016 and 2021.
    Mean ± SD (Range) Significance of comparisons
    2016 2021
    Species richness 10.0 ± 2.3
    (6–15)
    11.9 ± 2.4
    (6–16)
    t = 2.93, P = 0.008
    Total number of individuals 87.0 ± 61.9
    (10–298)
    147.6 ± 82.6
    (25–393)
    t = 2.38, P = 0.028
    Shannon–Wiener diversity 1.86 ± 0.27
    (1.04–2.21)
    1.87 ± 0.30
    (1.21–2.38)
    t = 0.21, P = 0.836
    Pielou evenness 0.57 ± 0.08
    (0.32–0.67)
    0.59 ± 0.09
    (0.38–0.76)
    t = 0.81, P = 0.429
    Significant differences between the two years are highlighted in bold (paired t-test, n = 20).
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure  2.  Total number of waterbird individuals (with error bars showing standard errors) per guild type across subsidence wetlands in the Huainan coal mining area in 2016 and 2021. Significant differences between the two years are displayed with p-values in bold.
    Table  4.  Statistical results from GLMMs for the effects of environmental variables on the number of waterbird individuals across the 20 subsidence wetlands in the Huainan coal mining area.
    Variables Coefficient SE df t P
    Total number of individuals PA 34.99 11.42 15 3.06 0.008
    Number of individuals in each guild
    Vegetation gleaners PA 10.54 2.22 15 4.75 < 0.001
    Gulls PA 22.21 6.58 15 3.37 0.004
    Shorebirds Age 2.68 1.26 15 2.14 0.049
    Number of individuals of each species with main contributions to the temporal compositional changes
    Podiceps ruficollis PA 2.37 1.03 15 2.30 0.036
    Egretta garzetta PA 5.89 2.63 15 2.24 0.041
    Gallinula chloropus PA 8.78 1.72 15 5.10 < 0.001
    PP 4.10 1.81 15 2.26 0.039
    Chlidonias hybrida PA 21.50 6.43 15 3.34 0.005
    PA = area proportion of aquaculture enclosures in each wetland; PP = area proportion of floating photovoltaic panels in each wetland; Age = years since wetland creation.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The MRPP indicated an overall temporal shift in species compositions between 2016 and 2021 (A ​= ​0.04, P ​ < ​0.001), and the NMDS revealed clear separation between the two years (Fig. 3). The SIMPER analysis indicated that the compositional changes were mainly caused by the changes in the number of individuals of three dominant species, i.e., Chlidonias hybrida, Egretta garzetta and Gallinula chloropus (Table 5). Their numbers were positively correlated with the area proportion of aquaculture in wetlands (Table 4). Gallinula chloropus was also more abundant in wetlands with a larger area proportion of floating photovoltaic panels (Table 4).

    Figure  3.  Non-metric Multi-Dimensional Scaling (NMDS) ordination of the waterbird communities across the subsidence wetlands in the Huainan coal mining area in 2016 and 2021. The wetland IDs are displayed along with the symbols.
    Table  5.  The species (determined by the SIMPER analysis) contributing most to the overall compositional changes in the waterbird communities across the subsidence wetlands in the Huainan coal mining area from 2016 to 2021.
    Species Number of bird individuals
    (Mean ± SD)
    Contribution
    (%)
    Cumulative Significance of changes in numbers
    2016 2021 (%)
    Chlidonias hybrida 8.3 ± 10.4 40.5 ± 55.4 20.7 20.7 V = 204.0, P < 0.001
    Egretta garzetta 7.2 ± 11.8 19.5 ± 21.4 12.4 33.1 V = 185.0, P = 0.003
    Nycticorax nycticorax 21.3 ± 47.5 8.2 ± 16.4 12.3 45.4 V = 43.5, P = 0.123
    Gallinula chloropus 9.0 ± 5.4 21.9 ± 16.8 10.8 56.2 V = 180.5, P = 0.005
    Tachybaptus ruficollis 11.5 ± 5.6 14.5 ± 7.9 6.4 62.6 V = 111.5, P = 0.267
    Podiceps cristatus 5.3 ± 7.2 5.5 ± 8.7 5.6 68.2 V = 71.0, P = 0.897
    Bubulcus ibis 5.2 ± 12.9 6.1 ± 12.4 5.5 73.7 V = 41.5, P = 0.476
    Significant differences of individual number over the five years are highlighted in bold (paired Wilcoxon signed-ranks test, n = 20).
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The temporal pairwise β-diversities ranged from 0.19 to 0.67 with a mean value of 0.34 ​± ​0.12. On average, the turnover component (0.23 ​± ​0.15) was higher than the nestedness (0.11 ​± ​0.08) component. The β-diversity ratio (βsne/βsor) was 0.35 ​± ​0.28, indicating that the temporal compositional changes for most wetlands from 2016 to 2021 were primarily driven by species turnover.

    We recorded abundant waterbirds belonging to a variety of species across the subsidence wetlands in Huainan coal mining area in 2016 and 2021, indicating that these subsidence wetlands provide important habitats for large numbers of waterbird species during breeding season. The study provides further evidence for the importance of subsidence wetlands in providing compensatory habitats for a variety of waterbird species (Li et al., 2019a). The subsidence wetlands in the North China Plain are still expanding due to continuing underground coal excavation (Liu et al., 2021). It was estimated that the total area of subsidence wetlands could ultimately reach 2 ​× ​106 ​ha (Hu et al., 2014). In the light of the continuous loss of natural wetlands, these man-made wetlands are expected to attract more waterbirds to forage, rest or nest, and therefore should be given full attention.

    We found that, for most wetlands, the number of waterbird individuals increased from 2016 to 2021, and the increase was mainly caused by an increase in vegetation gleaners and gulls. The species (e.g., Gallinula chloropus and Chlidonias hybrida) in these two guilds have high reproductive capacity and are well-adapted to anthropogenic disturbances in human-dominated environments (Quan et al., 2002). Their numbers were positively associated with the area proportion of aquaculture enclosures in wetlands. This could be explained by the rich food resources around these aquacultural activities and habitat fragmentation associated with aquaculture (Ma et al., 2010). We also found that species richness in most wetlands increased during the study period but we failed to detect any effects of the environmental variables thereon. The increasing familiarity of waterbirds to these wetlands at a larger scale, more suitable microhabitats for breeding and other unmeasured environmental factors might be possible reasons, which deserve further investigations (Li et al., 2019a). In contrast to our expectations, the Shannon–Wiener diversity and Pielou evenness did not change significantly over these five years. Although we observed a large number of waterbird species, the total number of birds was dominated by only a few species, such as Chlidonias hybrida and Gallinula chloropus. This resulted in relatively low values of diversity indices (Kunte, 2008), and these relatively small changes in diversity indices might therefore not be detected during the study period. Like other artificial wetlands, such as aquaculture ponds and paddy fields, habitat homogenization and extensive anthropogenic disturbances across subsidence wetlands may lead to a reduction in niche spaces, and a subsequent decline in waterbird species diversity (Węsławski et al., 2011; Xu et al., 2020). This may highlight that, to protect diverse waterbirds in artificial wetlands, much efforts should be made to increase habitat diversity and reduce human disturbances.

    The results of MRPP indicated that the overall community composition changed from 2016 to 2021, which was mainly exhibited in changes in the number of individuals of several species (Appendix Table S3). Among these species, the numbers of three dominant species, Chlidonias hybrida, Egretta garzetta and Gallinula chloropus, increased during the study period, and were associated with the expansion of aquaculture area in the subsidence wetlands. In addition to abundant food resources as mentioned above, aquaculture cages may provide appropriate perches for these birds to rest, thus, attracting more birds with an increase in aquacultural activities (Ma et al., 2004). Additionally, the increase in Gallinula chloropus was also positively related to the installation of floating photovoltaic panels. This species can tolerate high levels of anthropogenic disturbances created by the photovoltaic power generation system (Li et al., 2019a), and may find appropriate refuges between and under the panels (Sahu et al., 2016). The individual increases of the three species and their positive correlations with the aquaculture and floating photovoltaic panels imply that these two kinds of human activities might be attributed for the community homogenization mentioned above. Although the number of Nycticorax nycticorax did not change over the five years, its contribution to the temporal compositional changes was also high. This might be related to its changes in spatial distribution among wetlands. Almost half individuals of this species were recorded in one wetland in 2016, but the number was more evenly spread over wetlands in 2021.

    As predicted, compared with the nestedness component, the turnover contributed more to the temporal pairwise β-diversity of the waterbird communities across subsidence wetlands. It has been found that turnover is the dominant component of β-diversity in a variety of taxa and ecosystems, highlighting the importance of environment conditions and the species' dispersal capacity in shaping β-diversity (Gianuca et al., 2017; Soininen et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2017). A previous study also found that the spatial variation in waterbird community structure during the migration and wintering seasons across subsidence wetlands was dominated by species turnover (Li et al., 2019c, 2021a,b). In shaping the temporal changes in species composition, the correlation with the turnover component suggests that certain species are replaced by others over time (Baselga, 2010; Baselga et al., 2015). A possible reason for the importance of species turnover in shaping temporal pairwise β-diversity could be associated with temporal changes in the surrounding environment and quick responses of certain waterbird species to these changes (Baselga, 2010; Henry and Cumming, 2017). The subsidence wetlands were surrounded by human-dominated landscape with dramatic environmental changes due to extensive anthropogenic activities (Li et al., 2019a). A variety of waterbird species with strong movement abilities, such as gulls, herons and egrets, might be attracted to these subsidence wetlands (Fandos et al., 2020; Lorenzón et al., 2020). However, many of them may not adapt well to local environmental changes over time and leave wetlands (Wang et al., 2018). Therefore, for most wetlands, the waterbird species were replaced over a short period. It is worth to point out that, the importance of temporal turnover, together with the spatial turnover (Li et al., 2019c, 2021a,b), suggest that all subsidence wetlands, rather than only big ones, have potential conservation values because of their relative high contributions to regional diversity (Si et al., 2015).

    Previous studies found that environmental changes have multifaceted effects on waterbird communities in artificial wetlands (Mundava et al., 2012; Blandón et al., 2016; Zhou et al., 2020). Various environmental factors might act as filters selecting species that can adapt to local environments and coexist in a community (Li et al., 2019b, 2021a,b). The temporal changes in environmental conditions can also drive temporal changes in community structures. The effects of these environmental changes may not be only reflected in the taxonomic dimensions of the communities, but also on its functional and phylogenetic facets, which might exhibit different patterns and deserve further studies (Li et al., 2019b; Zeng et al., 2019). Furthermore, apart from the environmental variables measured in this study, the temporal changes in waterbird communities across the subsidence wetlands in the North China Plain may also be associated with other factors. For example, the effects of larger scale population trends, species' phenological characteristics, and stochastic processes should be considered in further studies based on long-term monitoring of waterbird communities and environments (Baselga et al., 2015; Li et al., 2019a).

    We recorded a large number of waterbirds across subsidence wetlands in the North China Plain in 2016 and 2021, supporting the key role of these artificial wetlands in providing important compensatory habitats for waterbird species in the context of loss and degradation of natural wetlands. From 2016 to 2021, the number of waterbird individuals and species richness increased in most wetlands, and this increase in bird number was mainly due to an increase in vegetation gleaners and gulls. However, the Shannon–Wiener diversity and Pielou evenness did not differ over the five years, which might be explained by the extreme numbers of a few dominant species. The species composition in most wetlands changed during the study period, and the temporal pairwise β-diversity was mainly driven by species turnover rather than nestedness. To appropriately protect the waterbird assemblages in these artificial wetlands, long-term monitoring on waterbirds and habitat variables should be carried out to capture their spatial-temporal dynamics. Furthermore, these wetlands should be an integral part of biodiversity conservation, and we encourage enhancing habitat diversity and reducing human disturbances in the framework of wise management of the wetlands.

    All authors contributed to the study conception and design. CL conceived the study. GW, JZ, WL and XS collected the data. GW and CL performed the analyses. GW wrote the first draft of the paper. CL, WFdB and YZ revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avrs.2023.100110.

  • The State Forestry Administration. China national wetlands conservation action plan. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House; 2000 (in Chinese).
    The State Forestry Administration. China wetlands resources master volume. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House; 2015 (in Chinese).
    Amano T, Székely T, Sandel B, Nagy S, Mundkur T, Langendoen T, Blanco D, Soykan CU, Sutherland WJ.2017. Successful conservation of global waterbird populations depends on effective governance. Nature, 553:199-202.
    An SQ, Li HB, Guan BH, Zhou CF, Wang ZS, Deng ZF, Zhi YB, Liu YH, Xu C, Fang SB, Jiang JH, Li HL.2007. China's natural wetlands: past problems, current status, and future challenges. Ambio, 36:335-42.
    Bai QQ, Chen JZ, Chen ZH, Dong GT, Dong JT, Dong WX, Fu YQ, Han YX, Lu G, Li J, Liu Y, Lin Z, Meng DR, Martinez J, Ni GH, Shan K, Sun RJ, Tian SX, Wang FQ, Xu ZW, Yu YT, Yang J, Yang ZD, Zhang L, Zhang M, Zeng XW.2015. Identification of coastal wetlands of international importance for waterbirds: a review of China Coastal Waterbird Surveys 2005‒2013. Avian Res, 6:12.
    Barter M. Shorebirds of the Yellow Sea: importance, threats and conservation status. Canberra: Wetlands International; 2002.
    Both C, Visser ME.2001. Adjustment to climate change is constrained by arrival date in a long-distance migrant bird. Nature, 411:296-8.
    Cao WZ, Wong MH.2007. Current status of coastal zone issues and management in China: a review. Environ Int, 33:985-92.
    Chen SH, Ding P. Waterbirds in China. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House; 2008 (in Chinese).
    Chen L, He FQ.2011. Are they hybrids of Sterna bergii×Sterna bernsteini? Chin Birds, 2:152-6.
    Chen HL, Li YB, Li ZJ, Shi JZ, Shinya K, Deng GH, Qi QL, Tian GB, Fan SF, Zhao HD, Sun YX, Kawaoka Y.2006. Properties and dissemination of H5N1 viruses isolated during an influenza outbreak in migratory waterfowl in western China. J Virol, 80:5976-83.
    Chen SH, Fan ZY, Lu YW, Huang Q.2014. Conservation and restoration of critically endangered Sterna bernsteini. Zhejiang For, B02: 20-1 (in Chinese).
    Chen SH, Fan ZY, Roby DD, Lu YW, Chen CS, Huang Q, Cheng LJ, Zhu J.2015. Human harvest, climate change and their synergistic effects drove the Chinese Crested Tern to the brink of extinction. Glob Ecol Conserv, 4:137-45.
    Crighton P.2016. Bird mortality in fish nets at a significant stopover site of the Spoon-billed Sandpiper Calidris pygmaea in the Yellow Sea, China. Stilt, 69-70:74-6.
    Duan YB, Tian XH, Ma JZ, Zhu SY, Shai K.2015. Foraging habitat use of the oriental white storks during their breeding season. Acta Ecol Sin, 35:2628-34 (in Chinese).
    Galbraith H, Jones R, Park R, Clough J, Herrod JS, Harrington B, Page G.2002. Global climate change and sea level rise: potential losses of intertidal habitat for shorebirds. Waterbirds, 25:173-83.
    Gan XJ, Li B, Chen JK, Ma ZJ.2007. The ecological effects of biological invasions on birds. Biodivers Sci, 15:548-57 (in Chinese).
    Gan XJ, Cai YT, Choi CY, Ma ZJ, Chen JK, Li B.2009. Potential impacts of invasive Spartina alterniflora on spring bird communities at Chongming Dongtan, a Chinese wetland of international importance. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci, 83:211-8.
    Gilroy JJ, Gill JA, Butchart SHM, Jones VR, Franco AMA.2016. Migratory diversity predicts population declines in birds. Ecol Lett, 19:308-17.
    Hallmann CA, Foppen RPB, vanTurnhout CAM, de Kroon H, Jongejans E.2014. Declines in insectivorous birds are associated with high neonicotinoid concentrations. Nature, 511:341-3.
    He FQ, Ren YQ.2011. Taolimiao Alashan-Nur Larus relictus seek development in the adversity. China Nat, 5:48-9 (in Chinese).
    Hu XX, Han ZH, Zhou YK, Cheng JP, Wang WH.2005. Distribution of organochlorine pesticides in surface sediments from Huangpu River and its risk evaluation. Environ Sci, 26:44-8 (in Chinese).
    Hua N, Tan K, Chen Y, Ma ZJ.2015. Key research issues concerning the conservation of migratory shorebirds in the Yellow Sea region. Bird Conserv Int, 25:38-52.
    Iwamura T, Possingham HP, Chadès I, Minton C, Murray NJ, Rogers DI, Treml EA, Fuller RA.2013. Migratory connectivity magnifies the consequences of habitat loss from sea-level rise for shorebird populations. Proc Roy Soc B Biol Sci, 280:1-8.
    Jiang S, Pang L, Huang C.2007. The harm and prevention of exotic Procambarus clarkii. Bull Biol, 42:15-6 (in Chinese).
    Jiang ZG, Jiang JP, Wang YZ, Zhang E, Zhang YY, Li LL, Xie F, Cai B, Cao L, Zheng GM, Dong L, Zhang ZW, Ding P, Luo ZH, Ding CQ, Ma ZJ, Tang SH, Cao WX, Li CW, Hu HJ, Ma Y, Wu Y, Wang YX, Zhou KY, Liu SY, Chen YY, Li JT, Feng ZJ, Wang Y, Wang B, Li C, Song XL, Cai L, Zang CX, Zeng Y, Meng ZB, Fang HX, Ping XG.2016. Red list of China's vertebrates. Biodivers Sci, 24:500-51 (in Chinese).
    Li DL, Chen SH, Guan L, Lioyd H, Liu YL, Lv JZ, Zhang ZW.2011. Patterns of waterbird community composition across a natural and restored wetland landscape mosaic, Yellow River Delta, China. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci, 91:325-32.
    Li DL, Liu Y, Sun XH, Lloyd H, Zhu SY, Zhang SY, Wan DM, Zhang ZW.2017. Habitat-dependent changes in vigilance behaviour of Red-crowned Crane influenced by wildlife tourism. Sci Rep, 7:16614.
    Li YF, Ye XP, Wang M, Li X, Dong R, Huo ZP, Yu XP.2018. Survival rates of a reintroduced population of the Crested Ibis Nipponia nippon in Ningshan County (Shaanxi, China). Bird Conserv Int, 28:145-56.
    Liu J, Xiao H, Lei F, Zhu Q, Qin K, Zhang XW, Zhang XL, Zhao D, Wang G, Feng Y, Ma J, Liu W, Wang J, Gao GF.2005. Highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus infection in migratory birds. Science, 309:1206.
    Liu HY, Li ZF, Li XM.2007. Ecological effects on Oriental White Stork (Ciconia boyciana) with habitat loss in sub-Sanjiang Plain, China. Acta Ecol Sin, 27:2678-83.
    Luo JM, Wang YJ, Yang F, Liu ZJ.2012. Effects of human disturbance on the Hooded Crane (Grus monacha) at stopover sites in northeastern China. Chin Birds, 3:206-16.
    Ma ZJ.2017. The importance of habitat protection for bird conservation. Bull Biol, 52:6-8 (in Chinese).
    Ma MR, Zhang T, Blank D, Ding P, Zhao XM.2012. Geese and ducks killed by poison and analysis of poaching cases in China. Goose Bull, 15:2-11.
    Ma ZJ, Cheng YX, Wang JY, Fu XH.2013. The rapid development of birdwatching in mainland China: a new force for bird study and conservation. Bird Conserv Int, 23:259-69.
    Ma ZJ, Melville D, Liu J, Chen Y, Yang H, Ren W, Zhang Z, Piersma T, Li B.2014. Rethinking China's new great wall. Science, 346:912-4.
    Melville DS, Chen Y, Ma ZJ.2016. Shorebirds along the Yellow Sea coast of China face an uncertain future—a review of threats. Emu, 116:100-10.
    Murray NJ, Fuller RA.2015. Protecting stopover habitat for migratory shorebirds in East Asia. J Ornithol, 156:217-25.
    Peng HB, Choi CY, Zhang L, Gan XJ, Liu WL, Jing LI, You CC, Wang SL, Ma ZJ.2017. Distribution and conservation status of the Spoon-billed Sandpiper in China. Chin J Zool, 1:158-66 (in Chinese).
    Piersma T, Lok T, Chen Y, Hassell CJ, Yang HY, Boyle A, Slaymaker M, Chan YC, Melville DS, Zhang ZW, Ma ZJ.2016. Simultaneous declines in summer survival of three shorebird species signals a flyway at risk. J Appl Ecol, 53:479-90.
    Piersma T, Chan YC, Mu T, Hassell CJ, Melville DS, Peng HB, Ma ZJ, Zhang ZW, Wilcove DS.2017. Loss of habitat leads to loss of birds: reflections on the Jiangsu, China, coastal development plans. Wader Study, 124:93-8.
    Stokstad E.2018. China moves to protect coastal wetlands used by migratory birds. Science, 359:500-2.
    Studds CE, Kendall BE, Murray NJ, Wilson HB, Rogers DI, Clemens RS, Gosbell K, Hassell CJ, Jessop R, Melville DS, Milton DA, Minton CDT, Possingham HP, Riegen AC, Straw P, Woehler EJ, Fuller RA.2017. Rapid population decline in migratory shorebirds relying on Yellow Sea tidal mudflats as stopover sites. Nat Commun, 8:14895.
    Sun JH, Wang GL, Zhang G, Li J, Chai Y, Wang JZ, Duan YP.2007. Distribution of organochlorine pesticides in surface sediments from the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River. Environ Sci, 28:1332-7 (in Chinese).
    Sun CZ, Zhen L, Wang C, Yan BY, Cao XC, Wu RZ.2015. Impacts of ecological restoration and human activities on habitat of overwintering migratory birds in the wetland of Poyang Lake, Jiangxi Province, China. J Mt Sci, 12:1302-14.
    Sung YH, Tse WL, Yu YT.2018. Population trends of the Black-faced Spoonbill Platalea minor: analysis of data from international synchronised censuses. Bird Conserv Int, 28:157-67.
    Thomas GH, Lanctot RB, Szekely T.2006. Can intrinsic factors explain population declines in North American breeding shorebirds? A comparative analysis. Anim Conserv, 9:252-8.
    Tian JL, He FY, Wang JQ, Yang J, Jin YP.2004. Influence of fire in 2001 on the inhabit and breeding of Red-crowned Crane in Zhalong Nature Reserve. For Sci Technol, 29:29-31 (in Chinese).
    Tian S, Xu XL, Liu ST, Zhang SP.2016. The influence of Dalai Lake area change on waterbird community. Sichuan J Zool, 35:201-9 (in Chinese).
    Wang Z, Li ZQ, Beauchamp G, Jiang ZG.2011. Flock size and human disturbance affect vigilance of endangered Red-crowned Cranes (Grus japonensis). Biol Conserv, 144:101-5.
    Wang C, Liu DP, Qing BP, Ding HH, Cui YY, Ye YX, Lu J, Yan L, Ke L, Ding CQ.2014. The current population and distribution of wild Crested Ibis Nipponia nippon. Chin J Zool, 49:666-71 (in Chinese).
    Wang WJ, Fraser JD, Chen JK.2017. Wintering waterbirds in the middle and lower Yangtze River floodplain: changes in abundance and distribution. Bird Conserv Int, 2:167-86.
    Wetlands International. Waterbird population estimates 5th ed. 2012. . Accessed 20 Oct 2017.
  • Xi JP. Secure a decisive victory in building a moderately prosperous society in all respects and strive for the great success of socialism with Chinese characteristics for a new era. 2017. . Accessed 22 Oct 2017 (in Chinese).
    Xi YM, Lu BZ, Fujihara N.2009. Captive rearing and breeding of the Crested Ibis, Nipponia nippon. J Poult Sci, 38:213-24.
    Xu ZH.2010. Experimental study on treatment of Spartina alterniflora in Fujian. Mar Environ Sci, 29:767-9 (in Chinese).
    Yang HY, Chen B, Barter M, Piersma T, Zhou CF, Li FS, Zhang ZW.2011. Impacts of tidal land reclamation in Bohai Bay, China: ongoing losses of critical Yellow Sea waterbird staging and wintering sites. Bird Conserv Int, 21:241-59.
    Yu YT, Swennen C.2004. Feeding of wintering Black-faced Spoonbills in Hong Kong: when and how long? Waterbirds, 27:135-40.
    Yu H, Wang X, Cao L, Zhang L, Jia Q, Lee H, Xu ZG, Liu GH, Xu WB, Hu BH, Fox AD.2017. Are declining populations of wild geese in China 'prisoners' of their natural habitats? Curr Biol, 27:376-7.
    Zeng ZY.2012. Warning from the poisoned 21 Oriental White Storks incident. Green Vis, 12:1 (in Chinese).
    Zeng Q, Wei Q, Lei GC.2018. Contribution of citizen science towards cryptic species census: "many eyes" define wintering range of the Scaly-sided Merganser in mainland China. Avian Res, 9:6.
    Zhang LL, Zhou LZ.2012. Genetic structure of wintering Hooded Cranes (Grus monacha) based on mitochondrial DNA D-loop sequences. Chin Birds, 3:71-8.
    Zhang B, Fang SG, Xi YM.2004. Low genetic diversity in the endangered Crested Ibis Nipponia nippon and implications for conservation. Bird Conserv Int, 14:183-90.
    Zhang M, Zou FS, Zhang GD, Chen S, Li ZR.2010. Human disturbance effect on Black-faced Spoonbill Platalea minor wintering in Macao. Chin J Zool, 45:75-81 (in Chinese).
    Zhang Y, Cao L, Barter M, Fox AD, Zhao MJ, Meng FJ, Shi HQ, Jiang Y, Zhu WZ.2011. Changing distribution and abundance of Swan Goose Anser cygnoides in the Yangtze River floodplain: the likely loss of a very important wintering site. Bird Conserv Int, 21:36-48.
    Zhang L, Wang X, Zhang JJ, Ouyang ZJ, Chan S, Crosby M, Watkins D, Martinez J, Su LY, Yu YT, Judit S, Cao L, Fox AD.2017. Formulating a list of sites of waterbird conservation significance to contribute to China's ecological protection red line. Bird Conserv Int, 27:153-66.
    Zhao ZH, Zhang L, Wu JL.2016. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in sediments from lakes along the middle-lower reaches of the Yangtze River and the Huaihe River of China. Limnol Oceanogr, 61:47-60.
    Zheng GM. A checklist on the classification and distribution of the birds of China. 3rd ed. Beijing: Science Press; 2017 (in Chinese).
    Zhi H, Zhao ZH, Zhang L.2015. The fate of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in water from Poyang Lake, the largest freshwater lake in China. Chemosphere, 119:1134-40.
  • Related Articles

Catalog

    Figures(1)  /  Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (633) PDF downloads (36) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return