Juan Huo, Canchao Yang, Tongping Su, Wei Liang, Anders Pape Møller. 2018: Russet Sparrows spot alien chicks from their nests. Avian Research, 9(1): 12. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-018-0104-y
Citation: Juan Huo, Canchao Yang, Tongping Su, Wei Liang, Anders Pape Møller. 2018: Russet Sparrows spot alien chicks from their nests. Avian Research, 9(1): 12. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-018-0104-y

Russet Sparrows spot alien chicks from their nests

Funds: 

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31672303 to CY

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31472013

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31772453 to WL

More Information
  • Background 

    In coevolutionary interactions between brood parasites and their hosts, host parents are under strong selection to evolve defenses against parasitism. Egg rejection is an efficient and common defense against parasitism, although some apparently suitable hosts do not reject cuckoo eggs.

    Methods 

    Sparrows Ploceidae are widespread throughout the Old World, and they have a suitable diet for rearing cuckoos, but still they are rarely exploited by brood parasites. To solve such puzzle, we conducted artificial parasitism and cross-fostering experiments in Russet Sparrow (Passer cinnamomeus).

    Results 

    The present study showed that Russet Sparrows have no egg recognition ability, but recognize their own nestlings and eject alien chicks or starve them to death. They may use visual cues in chick recognition, although they accept sister species Tree Sparrow (Passer montanus).

    Conclusions 

    By rejecting nestlings of foreign species, Russet Sparrows have succeeded to escape from the brood parasitism by cuckoos and other parasites. Our studies shed light on the puzzle why some species are not utilized by cuckoo parasites as hosts.

  • About eight years ago we received an email from Bulgaria. It is not uncommon to receive such emails from former Eastern bloc or other countries, particularly from the third world. However, this was a special one. Albeit the English was rather naïve, he asked us if we were interested in collaboration on studies on the common cuckoo and its hosts in Bulgaria. This potential student had already conducted a series of impressive experiments on cuckoo hosts in Bulgaria, but wanted some help in design of new studies, writing of papers and data analyses.

    After a brief discussion among us, we decided to invite the young man to our lab for a discussion. He turned out to be a silent, shy, polite young person, however, we were impressed about the work he already had conducted in his field site in Bulgaria. We discussed the possibility of doing a PhD in our lab, an offer Anton acknowledged. He turned out to have very good grades, so when he applied for a competitive grade-based PhD at our faculty, he turned out to be one of the best candidates, even with many applicants from the competitive science of physics. This was in 2006, and Anton had already published several papers (Antonov et al., 2006a, 2006b, 2006c). He started his PhD work in September 2006.

    Anton learned quickly. His English improved dramatically from the naïve and unripe English two years previously. His ideas were many, but at a high scientific level. However, as an experienced fieldworker he realized the limits of fieldwork. His ideas were therefore prioritized to ensure that these that were most important and feasible, were the ones with highest priority. Each year he started with larks (Antonov et al., 2010), thereafter he continued with the corn bunting (Antonov et al., 2006b), the marsh and great reed warblers (Antonov et al., 2007a, 2012) and finally the olivaceous warbler (Antonov et al., 2007b, 2007c, 2009). In between this laborious and time consuming fieldwork he managed to ensure experiments on many other potential hosts (Antonov et al., 2011). He involved himself in the academic working environment. His contributions were always mature and significant.

    In 2010, Anton defended his PhD. However, having about 20 different already published scientific papers, a discussion about the topic of his PhD was extraordinary. Anton himself came up with a suggestion – his best papers were on "why cuckoos lay strong-shelled eggs" (Antonov, 2010; Antonov et al., 2012, this issue). The PhD consisted of five published papers in high quality journals (Antonov et al., 2006a, 2006c, 2008a, 2008b, 2009).

    Anton's scientific and practical skills were appreciated. He has been invited to China since 2010. There he has been conducting fieldwork at several field sites. We were always deeply impressed by his nest searching skills, and in China he managed to find ten parasitized nests of the Emerald Cuckoo (Chrysococcyx maculatus) in one season. For comparison the Chinese colleagues had found only three such parasitized nests in ten seasons, proving the excellent field talents of Anton.

    Anton held special intellectual talents. However, he was also a very emotional person. His emotional cycles went up and down from high mountains to deep valleys. For him therefore, life became occasionally very difficult. During such periods he went into deep depressions hard to get out of. Last winter was such a period. Life became very difficult for Anton, therefore he decided to leave us on May 21, 2012. As a scientist he had learned by Sokrades, and chose the same method as this ancient philosopher. In Anton Antonov, science has lost a great and talented scholar. However, we will remember him as a good friend and colleague, and we are sure his papers will be red for many years to come.

    Antonov A, Stokke BG, Fossøy F, Liang W, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Yang C, Møller AP. 2012. Why do brood parasitic birds lay strong-shelled eggs? Chinese Birds, 3:245–258.

    Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Kleven O, Honza M, Røskaft E. 2006a. Eggshell strength of an obligate brood parasite: a test of the puncture resistance hypothesis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 60:11–18.

    Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. 2006b. Coevolutionary interactions between Common Cuckoos and Corn Buntings. Condor, 108:414–422.

    Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. 2006c. Egg rejection in Marsh Warblers (Acrocephalus palustris) heavily parasitized by Common Cuckoos (Cuculus canorus). Auk, 123:419–430.

    Antonov A, Stokke BG, Ranke PS, Fossøy F, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. 2010. Absence of egg discrimination in a suitable cuckoo Cuculus canorus host breeding away from trees. J Avian Biol, 41:501–504.

    Antonov A, Stokke BG, Fossøy F, Ranke PS, Liang W, Yang C, Moksnes A, Shykoff J, Røskaft E. 2012. Are cuckoos maximizing egg mimicry by selecting host individuals with better matching egg phenotypes? PLoS ONE, 7:e31704.

    Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. 2007a. Factors influencing the risk of common cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism on marsh warblers Acrocephalus palustris. J Avian Biol, 38:390–393.

    Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. 2007b. First evidence of regular common cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, parasitism on Eastern olivaceous warblers, Hippolais pallida elaeica. Naturwissenschaften, 94:307–312.

    Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. 2007c. Aspects of breeding ecology of the eastern olivaceous warbler (Hippolais pallida). J Ornithol, 148:443–451.

    Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. 2009. Evidence for egg discrimination preceding failed rejection attempts in a small cuckoo host. Biol Letter, 5:169–171.

    Antonov A, Avilés JM, Stokke BG, Spasova V, Vikan JR, Moksnes A, Yang C, Liang W, Røskaft E. 2011. Egg discrimination in an open nesting passerine under dim light conditions. Ethology, 117:1128–1137.

    Antonov A. 2010. Why do cuckoos lay strong-shelled eggs? Tests of the puncture resistance hypothesis. PhD thesis. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, p 70.

    Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. 2008a. Does the cuckoo benefit from laying unusually strong eggs? Anim Behav, 76:1893–1900.

    Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. 2008b. Getting rid of the cuckoo Cuculus canorus egg: why do hosts delay rejection? Behav Ecol, 19:100–107.

  • Allende LM, Rubio I, Ruíz-del-Valle V, Guillén J, Martínez-Laso J, Lowy E, Varela P, Zamora J, Arnaiz-Villena A. The Old world sparrows (Genus Passer) phylogeography and their relative abundance of nuclear mtDNA pseudogenes. J Mol Evol. 2001;53:144–54.
    Baumgartner AM. Food and feeding habits of the tree sparrow. Wilson Bull. 1937;49:65–80.
    Briskie JV, Sealy SG, Hobson KA. Differential parasitism of least flycatchers and yellow warblers by the brown-headed cowbird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1990;27:403–10.
    Colombelli-Négrel D, Hauber ME, Robertson J, Sulloway FJ, Hoi H, Griggio M, Kleindorfer S. Embryonic learning of vocal passwords in superb fairy-wrens reveals intruder cuckoo nestlings. Curr Biol. 2012;22:1–6.
    Davies NB. Cuckoo, cowbirds and other cheats. London: T & AD Poyser; 2000.
    Davies NB, Brooke M de L. Cuckoos versus reed warblers: adaptations and counteradaptations. Anim Behav. 1988;36:262–84.
    Davies NB, Welbergen JA. Social transmission of a host defense against cuckoo parasitism. Science. 2009;324:1318–20.
    De Mársico MC, Gantchoff MG, Reboreda JC. Host-parasite coevolution beyond the nestling stage? mimicry of host fledglings by the specialist screaming cowbird. Proc R Soc B. 2012;279:3401–8.
    Deng W. Brood parasitism on yellow-rumped flycatcher (Ficedula zanthopygia) by the Oriental cuckoo (Cuculus optatus) in an artificial nestbox in Beijing. Chin Birds. 2013;4:187–8.
    Feeney WE, Welbergen JA, Langmore NE. The frontline of avian brood parasite-host coevolution. Anim Behav. 2012;84:3–12.
    Girard J, Baril A, Mineau P, Fahrig L. Foraging habitat and diet of song sparrows (Melospiza melodia) nesting in farmland: a stable isotope approach. Can J Zool. 2012;90:1339–50.
    Grim T. The evolution of nestling discrimination by hosts of parasitic birds: why is rejection so rare? Evol Ecol Res. 2006;8:785–802.
    Grim T. Experimental evidence for chick discrimination without recognition in a brood parasite host. Proc R Soc B. 2007;274:373–81.
    Grim T. Ejecting chick cheats: a changing paradigm? Front Zool. 2011;8:14.
    Grim T, Kleven O, Mikulica O. Nestling discrimination without recognition: a possible defence mechanism for hosts towards cuckoo parasitism? Proc R Soc B. 2003;270:S73–5.
    Grim T, Samaš P, Moskát C, Kleven O, Honza M, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Stokke BG. Constraints on host choice: why do parasitic birds rarely exploit some common potential hosts? J Anim Ecol. 2011;80:508–18.
    Grim T, Samaš P, Procházka P, Rutila J. Are tits really unsuitable hosts for the common cuckoo? Ornis Fenn. 2014;91:166–77.
    Guigueno MF, Sealy SG. Nest sanitation in passerine birds: implications for egg rejection in hosts of brood parasites. J Ornithol. 2012;153:35–52.
    Jetz W, Thomas GH, Joy JB, Hartmann K, Mooers AO. The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature. 2012;491:444–8.
    Kilner RM, Langmore NE. Cuckoo versus hosts in insects and birds: adaptations, counter-adaptations and outcomes. Biol Rev. 2011;86:836–52.
    Langmore NE, Hunt S, Kilner RM. Escalation of a coevolutionary arms race through host ejection of brood parasitic young. Nature. 2003;422:157–60.
    Li D, Zhang Z, Grim T, Liang W, Stokke BG. Explaining variation in brood parasitism rates between potential host species with similar habitat requirements. Evol Ecol. 2016;30:905–23.
    Liang W, Yang C, Wang L, Møller AP. Avoiding parasitism by breeding indoors: cuckoo parasitism of hirundines and rejection of eggs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2013;67:913–8.
    Liang W, Møller AP, Stokke BG, Yang C, Kovařík P, Wang H, Yao C-T, Ding P, Lu X, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Grim T. Geographic variation in egg ejection rate by great tits across 2 continents. Behav Ecol. 2016;27:1405–12.
    Lopez de Hierro MDG, Moreno-Rueda G. Egg-spot pattern rather than egg colour affects conspecific egg rejection in the house sparrow (Passer domesticus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2010;64:317–24.
    Lotem A. Learning to recognize nestling is maladaptive for cuckoo Cuculus canorus hosts. Nature. 1993;362:743–4.
    Manna T, Cooper C, Baylis S, Shawkey MD, Waterhouse GIN, Grim T, Hauber ME. Does the house sparrow Passer domesticus represent a global model species for egg rejection behavior? J Avian Biol. 2017;48:346–52.
    Marchetti K. Egg rejection in a passerine bird: size does matter. Anim Behav. 2000;59:877–83.
    Mlíkovský J. Correct name for the Asian russet sparrow. Chin Birds. 2011;2:109–10.
    Moksnes A, Røskaft E. Egg-morphs and host preference in the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus): an analysis of cuckoo and host eggs from European museum collections. J Zool. 1995;236:625–48.
    Moskát C, Hauber ME. Conflict between egg recognition and egg rejection decisions in common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) hosts. Anim Cogn. 2007;10:377–86.
    Moskát C, Székely T, Kisbenedek T, Karcza Z, Bártol I. The importance of nest cleaning in egg rejection behaviour of great reed warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus. J Avian Biol. 2003;34:16–9.
    Rothstein SI. An experimental and teleonomic investigation of avian brood parasitism. The Condor. 1975;77:250–71.
    Samaš P, Rutila J, Grim T. The common redstart as a suitable model to study cuckoo-host coevolution in a unique ecological context. BMC Evol Biol. 2016;16:255.
    Sato NJ, Tokue K, Noske RA, Mikami OK, Ueda K. Evicting cuckoo nestlings from the nest: a new anti-parasitism behaviour. Biol Lett. 2010;6:67–9.
    Seel DC. Food, feeding rates and body temperature in the nestling house sparrow Passer domesticus at Oxford. Ibis. 2008;111:36–47.
    Soler M. Long-term coevolution between avian brood parasites and their hosts. Biol Rev. 2014;89:688–704.
    Soler M, Ruiz-Castellano C, Fernández-Pinos MC, Rösler A, Ontanilla J, Pérez-Contreras T. House sparrows selectively eject parasitic conspecific eggs and incur very low rejection costs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2011;65:1997–2005.
    Spottiswoode CN, Stevens M. Visual modeling shows that avian host parents use multiple visual cues in rejecting parasitic eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:8672–6.
    Starling M, Heinsohn R, Cuckburn A, Langmore NE. Cryptic gentes revealed in pallied cuckoos Cuculus pallidus using reflectance spectrophotometry. Proc R Soc B. 2006;273:1929–34.
    Stoddard MC, Stevens M. Avian vision and the evolution of egg color mimicry in the common cuckoo. Evolution. 2011;65:2004–13.
    Taborsky M. Sample size in the study of behaviour. Ethology. 2010;116:185–202.
    Wang L, Yang C, Møller AP, Liang W, Lu X. Multiple mechanisms of egg recognition in a cuckoo host. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2015;69:1761–7.
    Yang C, Liang W, Cai Y, Shi SH, Takasu F, Møller AP, Antonov A, Fossøy F, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Stokke BG. Coevolution in action: disruptive selection on egg colour in an avian brood parasite and its host. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e10816.
    Yang C, Liang W, Cai Y, Wu J, Shi S, Antonov A. Variation in russet sparrow (Passer cinnamomeus) breeding biology in relation to small-scale altitudinal differences in China. Zool Sci. 2012a;29:419–22.
    Yang C, Liang W, Antonov A, Cai Y, Stokke BG, Fossøy F, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. Diversity of parasitic cuckoos and their hosts in China. Chin Birds. 2012b;3:9–32.
    Yang C, Stokke BG, Antonov A, Cai Y, Shi S, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Møller AP, Liang W, Grim T. Host selection in parasitic birds: are open-cup nesting insectivorous passerines always suitable cuckoo hosts? J Avian Biol. 2013;44:216–20.
    Yang C, Møller AP, Røskaft E, Moksnes A, Liang W, Stokke BG. Reject the odd egg: egg recognition mechanisms in parrotbills. Behav Ecol. 2014;25:1320–4.
    Yang C, Hu Y, Ma M, Liang W, Møller AP. Absence of egg rejection in an Asian population of house sparrow (Passer domesticus), a conspecific brood parasite in Europe. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2015a;69:723–7.
    Yang C, Wang L, Chen M, Liang W, Møller AP. Nestling recognition in red-rumped and barn swallows. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2015b;69:1821–6.
    Yang C, Wang L, Liang W, Møller AP. Nest sanitation behavior in hirundines as a pre-adaptation to egg rejection to counter brood parasitism. Anim Cogn. 2015c;18:355–60.
    Yang C, Wang L, Liang W, Møller AP. Egg recognition as antiparasitism defence in hosts does not select for laying of matching eggs in parasitic cuckoos. Anim Behav. 2016a;122:177–81.
    Yang C, Wang L, Liang W, Møller AP. Contrasting egg recognition between European and Asian populations of tree sparrows (Passer montanus). Behav Proc. 2016b;125:85–8.
  • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(14)

    1. Yuhan Zhang, Guo Zhong, Longwu Wang, et al. Nestling retrieval behavior in two bunting hosts of the common cuckoo. Journal of Ethology, 2025. DOI:10.1007/s10164-025-00836-w
    2. Sidhant Jain, Mallikarjun N. Shakarad. Adoption and foster parenting: an evolutionary enigma?. Ethology Ecology & Evolution, 2024, 36(1): 1. DOI:10.1080/03949370.2023.2225032
    3. Hee-Jin Noh, Ros Gloag, Naomi E. Langmore. Multiple parasitism promotes facultative host acceptance of cuckoo eggs and rejection of cuckoo chicks. Animal Behaviour, 2023, 202: 1. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2023.05.004
    4. Jing‐Chia Guo, Jo‐Szu Tsai, Jhih‐Syuan Wang, et al. The role of a synanthropic bird in the nest niche expansion of a secondary cavity nester to man‐made structures. Ecology and Evolution, 2022, 12(8) DOI:10.1002/ece3.9188
    5. Jörn Theuerkauf, Camila P. Villavicencio, Nicolas M. Adreani, et al. Austral birds offer insightful complementary models in ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2022, 37(9): 759. DOI:10.1016/j.tree.2022.05.003
    6. Qihong Li, Jianli Bi, Jiangwen Wu, et al. Impact of nest sanitation behavior on hosts’ egg rejection: an empirical study and meta-analyses. Current Zoology, 2021, 67(6): 683. DOI:10.1093/cz/zoab057
    7. Canchao Yang. Personality, recognition cues, and nest sanitation in obligate avian brood parasitism: what do we know and what comes next?. Current Zoology, 2021, 67(6): 621. DOI:10.1093/cz/zoab079
    8. Jiaojiao WANG, Qihong LI, Longwu WANG, et al. Do swallows (Hirundo daurica) use the visual cue of hatchling down‐feathers to discriminate parasite alien nestlings?. Integrative Zoology, 2020, 15(5): 441. DOI:10.1111/1749-4877.12436
    9. Miyu SASAKI, Haruna SUZUKI, Masao TAKAHASHI, et al. Breeding philopatry and natal philopatry of Russet Sparrow <i>Passer cinnamomeus</i> breeding in lowland open forest in eastern Aomori Prefecture. The Bulletin of the Japanese Bird Banding Association, 2020, 32(1_2): 12. DOI:10.14491/jbba.MS126
    10. M. Polačik, M. Reichard, C. Smith, et al. Parasitic cuckoo catfish exploit parental responses to stray offspring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2019, 374(1769): 20180412. DOI:10.1098/rstb.2018.0412
    11. Jianping Liu, Cheng Cheng, Wei Liang. Egg recognition and chick discrimination in colonial breeding birds. Behavioural Processes, 2019, 168: 103955. DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103955
    12. Laikun Ma, Canchao Yang, Wei Liang. Hawk mimicry does not reduce attacks of cuckoos by highly aggressive hosts. Avian Research, 2018, 9(1) DOI:10.1186/s40657-018-0127-4
    13. Juan Huo, Tongping Su, Nan Niu, et al. Last but not the least: effects of laying sequence on egg color variation and embryonic development of Russet Sparrow (Passer cinnamomeus). Avian Research, 2018, 9(1) DOI:10.1186/s40657-018-0113-x
    14. Tomáš Grim. Avian Brood Parasitism. Fascinating Life Sciences, DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-73138-4_29

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Figures(3)  /  Tables(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (242) PDF downloads (6) Cited by(14)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return