
Citation: | Pratikshya Kandel, Ishana Thapa, Nakul Chettri, Rebecca Pradhan Pradhan, Eklabya Sharma. 2018: Birds of the Kangchenjunga Landscape, the Eastern Himalaya: status, threats and implications for conservation. Avian Research, 9(1): 9. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-018-0100-2 |
Birds are reliable and widely used indicators for conservation planning and monitoring. We reviewed birds of the Kangchenjunga Landscape, a transboundary complex shared by Bhutan, India and Nepal in the Eastern Himalaya. Using 119 literature, we analyzed the bird survey efforts in the landscape, their taxonomic representation, global threat status, distribution patterns, and habitat preferences. We also discussed the potential threats and conservation challenges and documented current conservation efforts and government policies. Most of the bird surveys are carried out in India followed by Nepal and Bhutan. A total of 618 bird species belonging to 19 orders and 77 families are recorded. Passeriformes is the dominant order that constitutes 62% of the total records listed from the landscape. Among the families, Muscicapidae is the most common and diversely represented family. There are 41 species of birds that are categorized as threatened under IUCN Red List. Of the total birds occurring in the landscape, the highest number of bird species (95%) was documented from India, followed by Nepal (55%) and Bhutan (34%). Of them, 24% of the species were found to occur in the tropical zone. Forested habitat is widely used by 63% of the total species followed by wetlands (16%). Despite promising policies and legal provisions, the landscape faces numerous challenges including habitat loss and fragmentation, hunting and trapping, unsustainable extraction of natural resources, invasive alien species, unregulated tourism and global climate change. We suggest protection and management of birds through strengthening Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas, reduction in forest encroachment and habitat destruction, conservation awareness programmes and comprehensive bird surveys with long term monitoring to assess the impact of environmental change as some of the approaches to conserve the rich avifaunal diversity of the landscape.
Australia is home to one of the most diverse groups of parasitic cuckoos in the world, ranging from one of the world's smallest cuckoos, the Little Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites minutillus, 17 g, Fig. 1, Brooker and Brooker, 1989) to the enormous Channel-billed Cuckoo (Scythrops novaehollandiae), which, at 610 g, is the world's largest parasitic cuckoo (Fig. 2, Brooker and Brooker, 1989). Overall, eleven species of cuckoo belonging to five genera occur in Australia (Table 1), although one of these, the Oriental Cuckoo (Cuculus optatus), does not breed in Australia and will not be discussed further.
Cuckoo | Major hosts |
Pallid Cuckoo (Cacomantis pallidus) |
Red Wattlebird (Anthochaera carunculata), Yellow-throated Miner (Manorina flavigula), Lichenostomus spp., Black-headed Honeyeater (Melithreptus affinis) |
Fan-tailed Cuckoo (Cacomantis flabelliformis) |
White-browed Scrubwren (Sericornis frontalis), Brown Thornbill (Acanthiza pusilla), Inland Thornbill (Acanthiza apicalis) |
Brush Cuckoo (Cacomantis variolosus) |
Ramsayornis spp., Scarlet Robin (Petroica boodang), Leaden Flycatcher (Myiagra rubecula), Grey Fantail (Rhipidura fuligonosa) |
Chestnut-breasted Cuckoo (Cacomantis castaneiventris) |
Large-billed Scrubwren (Sericornis magnirostra), Tropical Scrubwren (Sericornis beccarii), Lovely Fairy-wren (Malurus amabilis) |
Black-eared Cuckoo (Chalcites osculans) |
Redthroat (Pyrrholaemus brunneus), Speckled Warbler (Chthonicola sagittata) |
Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites basalis) | Fairy-wrens (Malurus spp.) |
Shining Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites lucidus) |
Thornbills (Acanthiza spp.) |
Little Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites minutillus) |
Gerygones (Gerygone spp.) |
Pacific Koel (Eudynamis scolopacea) |
Red Wattlebird (Anthochaera carunculata), Philemon spp., Magpie-lark (Grallina cyanoleuca), Figbird (Sphecotheres viridis) |
Channel-billed Cuckoo (Scythrops novaehollandiae) |
Pied Currawong (Strepera graculina), Corvus spp. |
Oriental cuckoo (Cuculus optatus |
Non-breeding vagrant |
The Australian cuckoos belong to the family Cuculinae, the Old World parasitic cuckoos. In all, there are 54 species belonging to 12 genera in the Cuculinae, distributed across Europe, Africa, Asia and Australasia (Davies, 2000). None of the five genera in Australia is endemic. The large Channel-billed Cuckoo is the only member of its genus and it occurs in Australia, New Guinea and Indonesia (Higgins, 1999). The Koels (Eudynamys spp.) are large cuckoos (120–360 g) that occur in Asia and Australasia. The medium-sized Cuculus cuckoos (52–150 g) are distributed throughout Europe, Africa, Asia and Australia. The Cacomantis cuckoos are smaller (22–44 g) and occur in Asia, New Guinea and Australia. The Chalcites cuckoos are the smallest cuckoos (17–35 g) and occur in Asia and Australasia (Davies, 2000).
Parasitic cuckoos lay their eggs in the nests of other bird species. The female typically removes one of the host eggs and lays a single egg in the nest of the host. Thereafter, the female cuckoo abandons all interest in her offspring and the task of rearing the young cuckoo is borne entirely by the hosts (Fig. 3). In Australia, all except the Channel-billed Cuckoo (Scythrops novaehollandiae) are evicting species, meaning that the cuckoo chick evicts the host eggs or chicks from the nest soon after hatching (Fig. 4). Channel-billed Cuckoo chicks are reared alongside the chicks of their corvid hosts, although host young rarely survive to fledging (Higgins, 1999).
Some cuckoos are specialists and parasitize only a single host species, but the Australian cuckoos all parasitize more than one host. Brooker and Brooker (1989) conducted an exhaustive survey of the hosts of Australian cuckoos and this remains the most comprehensive and detailed examination of cuckoo parasitism in Australia. The most commonly-used, successful hosts were identified as 'major hosts'. The Brookers' survey revealed that most Australian cuckoos target different major hosts (Table 1). The only exceptions were the Fan-tailed Cuckoo (Cacomantis flabelliformis) and the Shining Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites lucidus) which shared two of the same major hosts.
Several species of cuckoo are known to destroy the nests of hosts during late incubation or chick rearing (reviewed in Davies, 2000). This forces the host to renest, providing a ready supply of host nests at the right stage for the cuckoo to lay in. Only the female cuckoo destroys host nests, indicating that this is a strategy to increase parasitism success, rather than a simple predation event. In Australia, this behavior has been observed in the Shining Bronze-cuckoo (Morris and Catchpole, 1978) and the Fan-tailed Cuckoo (Guppy et al., unpublished data). There is also circumstantial evidence of this behavior in Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo, because predation rates were significantly higher in weeks when the cuckoos were laying than at other times (Brooker and Brooker, 1996).
Few Australian cuckoos have been observed in the act of laying their eggs in host nests. Exceptions are Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites basalis), the Shining Bronze-cuckoo, and the Black-eared Cuckoo (Chalcites osculans), all of which laid their eggs in just a few seconds (Brooker et al., 1988; Higgins, 1999). The Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoos laid after the host female had laid her own eggs and laying was very rapid, ranging from 1.5 to 5.3 s (Brooker et al., 1988). Rapid laying reduces the chances that the host will detect the cuckoo and launch defenses such as mobbing of the cuckoo (Fig. 5, Langmore et al., 2012), abandonment of the nest (Langmore et al., 2003), or abandonment of the cuckoo chick (Langmore et al., 2009a).
In the Asian Koel (Eudynamis scolopacea), a close relative of the Pacific Koel (E. orientalis) in Australia, collaboration between the male and female has been observed during egg laying (Lamba, 1966). The male flies to the host nest first, inducing the hosts to attack it, then lures them away allowing the female to access the nest and lay her egg. It is not known whether this behavior also occurs in the Pacific Koel in Australia.
Many cuckoos around the world have evolved egg mimicry; eggs that mimic the pattern and color of the eggs of their host (Kilner, 2006; Stoddard and Stevens, 2011). This reduces the likelihood that the cuckoo egg will be rejected by the host (Spottiswoode and Stevens, 2010). However, parasitism of more than one host species creates a problem for the cuckoo, if different hosts lay different egg types. Australian cuckoos have evolved several ingenious means of fooling their hosts through egg morphology. Some species, such as Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo, lay a single egg type that is a good match of the eggs of both its major hosts, Fairywrens (Malurus spp.) (Fig. 6; Langmore et al., 2003; Langmore and Kilner, 2009), and its secondary hosts, thornbills (Acanthiza spp.). Other species have evolved polymorphic egg types, each of which resembles the egg of a different host. For example, the Brush Cuckoo (Cacomantis variolosus) lays three egg types, each of which matches its major host in a particular region of its distribution (Beruldsen, 2003). Similarly, the Pallid Cuckoo (Cacomantis pallidus), which primarily parasitizes honeyeaters, has evolved multiple egg types, each of which is a close match of the egg of a different host (Starling et al., 2006). However, the color differences between these host-specific egg types are so subtle that they had not been detected by human observation, and the use of reflectance spectometry was needed to quantify their color and differentiate between them (Starling et al., 2006).
Rather than relying on egg mimicry, the Shining Bronze-cuckoo and Little Bronze-cuckoo have evolved an alternative disguise for their eggs. They lay dark brown or olive-green eggs that look quite unlike the eggs of their hosts (Fig. 7). The eggs are so thickly coated with dark pigment that the pigment can be wiped off a freshly laid egg. These cuckoos lay their eggs in dark, dome-shaped nests (Fig. 8) and the color and luminance of the eggs are indistinguishable to a bird's eye from those of the nest lining inside the dark nest, effectively rendering the eggs invisible to the host (Langmore et al., 2009b). Rejection of cuckoo eggs by the hosts of these cuckoos is virtually unknown (Gill, 1983; Brooker and Brooker, 1989; Langmore et al., 2005, 2009).
Although dark, dome-shaped nests constrain cuckoo egg recognition via visual cues, hosts could still use tactile cues to detect an unusually sized egg. The Superb Fairy-wren hosts of Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo rarely reject an oddly coloured egg, but they are more likely to desert a clutch of eggs containing an egg larger than their own (Langmore et al., 2003). This has selected for a small egg relative to the cuckoo's body mass in Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo (Krüger and Davies, 2004). Many parasitic cuckoo species have also evolved unusually strong eggshells as adaptations to parasitism, including several Australian species (Picman and Pribil, 1997).
The chicks of most cuckoo species, including most Australian cuckoos, look quite unlike the host chicks. There has been no selection for chick mimicry because in general hosts do not recognize and reject chicks that look different from their own. However, several hosts of the Australian Bronze-cuckoos (Chalcites spp.) are unusual in that they reject cuckoo chicks, rather than cuckoo eggs (Langmore et al., 2003; Sato et al., 2010; Tokue and Ueda, 2010). This may be a consequence of the poor visibility inside their dark nests, which constrains detection of foreign eggs (Langmore et al., 2005, 2009b). In response to rejection by hosts, Bronze-cuckoo chicks have evolved to be striking visual and vocal mimics of the young of their major hosts (Fig. 9, Langmore et al., 2008, 2011) and non-mimetic nestlings suffer a survival cost (Langmore et al., 2003). Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo is the most generalist of these cuckoos, and parasitizes a range of different host species (Table 1). This cuckoo faces the problem of how to mimic the young of several distinct species. It has evolved two solutions to this problem. First, to mimic the begging calls of different host young, the cuckoo produces the call of its primary host as the default call soon after hatching. However, if it is in the nest of a secondary host it rapidly modifies its begging call over several days until it becomes indistinguishable from the calls of the host young (Langmore et al., 2008). This is a particularly impressive feat given that the cuckoo chick evicts the host young before hatching and never hears their calls. It seems likely that the calls are refined through reinforcement by host parents, specifically by selective provisioning in response to more accurately mimetic calls (Langmore et al., 2008). This solves the problem of how to prevent detection of the cuckoo chick by hosts through vocal cues. However the cuckoo still faces the problem of how to mimic the appearance of host young of several different species. The hosts of Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo produce chicks that range in skin colour from pink to grey to black. This appears to have selected for imperfect mimicry of several different host species in the cuckoo chick, which has evolved two-tone coloration. The chick has a grey head, pink upper back and grey lower back (Fig. 9, bottom panel, Langmore et al., 2011). This two-tone coloration probably allows the cuckoo to partially resemble host young, perhaps thereby reducing the probability of rejection by hosts. This cuckoo has evolved a 'jack of all trades' strategy, being an imperfect mimic of several genera rather than a specialist mimic of few closelyrelated species like the other Bronze-cuckoos.
Although there have been many fascinating discoveries about Australian cuckoos and the tricks they have evolved to fool their hosts, there is still much to discover. For example, how do hosts of the Little Bronze-cuckoo distinguish the cuckoo chick from their own young when mimicry of host young by the cuckoo is so accurate? Have the cryptic eggs of Bronze-cuckoos evolved to prevent rejection by hosts or by other female cuckoos that parasitize the same nest? Why do not Channel-billed Cuckoo chicks evict the host young from the nest like other Australian cuckoos? These and other questions will stimulate research for many years to come.
NEL was supported by an Australian Research Council Australian Research Fellowship. I thank William Feeney, John Grant, Michelle Hall, Golo Maurer and Julian Robinson for providing photos, Wei Liang for inviting this article, and two anonymous reviewers for commenting on the manuscript.
Acharya BK, Chettri B. Effect of climate change on birds, herpetofauna and butterflies in Sikkim Himalaya: a preliminary investigation. In: Arrawatia ML, Tambe S, editors. Climate change in Sikkim: patterns, impacts and initiatives. Gangtok: Information and Public Relations Department; 2012. p. 141-60.
|
Ali S. The birds of Sikkim. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 1962.
|
Aryal KP, Kerkhoff E, Maskey N, Sherchan R. Shifting cultivation in the Sacred Himalayan Landscape: a case study in the Kanchenjunga Conservation Area. 1st ed. Kathmandu: WWF Nepal; 2010.
|
Baral HS. Invasive weed threatens protected area. Danphe. 2002;11:10-1.
|
BirdLife International. Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife International Red data book. Cambridge: BirdLife International; 2001.
|
Blandford WT. Notes on collection of birds from Sikkim. JASB. 1871;41:30.
|
Blandford WT. Notes on collection of birds from Sikkim. Ibis. 1872;152-70.
|
Brooks WE. Ornithological observation in Sikkim, the Punjab and Sind. Stray Feathers. 1880;5:380-7.
|
Bulger GF. List of birds obtain in Sikkim, Eastern Himalayas between March and July 1867. Ibis. 1869;2:154-70.
|
CEPF. Ecosystem profile: Indo-Burman Hotspot, Eastern Himalayan region. Kathmandu: WWF, US-Asian Programme/Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund; 2005.
|
CEPF. Ecosystem profile: Indo-Burma Hotspot, Indochina region. Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund. Cambridge: Birdlife International; 2007.
|
Chaudhary RP, Uprety Y, Joshi SP, Basnet K, Basnet G, Shrestha KR, Bhatta KP, Acharya KP, Chettri N. Kangchenjunga Landscape Nepal: from conservation and development perspectives. Kathmandu: Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation (MoFSC), Government of Nepal; Research Centre for Applied Science and Technology (RECAST), Tribhuvan University; and International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD); 2015.
|
Chettri N, Jackson R, Sharma E. Birds of Khecheopalri and Yuksom-Dzongri trekking corridor west Sikkim. J Hill Res. 2005;18:16-25.
|
Chettri N, Shakya B, Sharma E. Biodiversity conservation in the Kangchenjunga Landscape. Kathmandu: ICIMOD; 2008.
|
Chettri N, Sharma E. Assessment of natural resources use patterns: a case study along a trekking corridor of Sikkim Himalaya. Resour Energy Dev. 2006;3:21-34.
|
Chettri N, Thapa R, Shakya B. Participatory conservation planning in Kangchenjunga transboundary biodiversity conservation landscape. Trop Ecol. 2007b;48:163-73.
|
Dahal BR. Effects of Water Hyacinth Eichhornia crassipes on aquatic birds at Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, south-east Nepal. Danphe. 2007;16:64-5.
|
Gammie JA. Occasional notes on birds from Sikkim. Stray Feathers. 1877;5:482-7.
|
Ganguli-Lachungpa U, Islam MZ, Rahamani AR. Important bird areas of Sikkim: priority sites for conservation. Gangtok: Department of Forest Environment and Wildlife Management; 2007.
|
Grimmett R, Inskipp C, Inskipp T. Birds of the Indian subcontinent. London: Christopher Helm; 1998.
|
ICIMOD, WCD, GBPNIHESD, RECAST. Kangchenjunga Landscape Conservation and Development Initiative feasibility assessment report—regional synthesis. ICIMOD working paper 2017/9. Kathmandu: ICIMOD; 2017.
|
Inskipp C, Baral HS, Inskipp T, Stattersfield A. The state of Nepal birds 2010. JoTT. 2013;5:3473-503.
|
Inskipp C, Inskipp T, Winspear R, Collin P, Robbin A, Pandey P, Thakuri J. Bird survey of the Kanchenjunga Conservation Area, April 2008. Report to Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund. Kathmandu: Bird Conservation Nepal; 2008.
|
Inskipp T, Lindsey N, Duckworth W. An annotated checklist of birds of oriental region. Sandy: Oriental Birds Club; 1996.
|
Jathar GA, Rahmani AR. Endemic birds of India. Buceros. 2006;11:5-53.
|
Law SC. Occurrence of the Smew [Mergellusalbellus (Linn.)] in West Bengal. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc. 1953;51:508-9.
|
Ludlow F, Kinnear NB. Systematic results of birds collected at high altitude in Ladak and Sikkim. Ibis. 1937b;79(3):467-504.
|
Maclaren PIR. Short birds notes from S. F. Sikkim. J Ben Nat Hist Soc. 1947;9:92-7.
|
Mills JD. An ornithologist's trip to Sikkim. J Ben Nat Hist Soc. 1944;19:57-70.
|
Mittermeier RA, Gils PR, Hoffman M, Pilgrim J, Brooks T, Mittermeier CG, Lamoreux J, Fonseca GA. Hotspots revisited. Earth's biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions. Mexico City: CEMEX/Agrupación Sierra Madre; 2004.
|
Sathyakumar S, Poudyal K, Bhattacharya T, Bashir T. Galliformes of Khangchendzonga Biosphere Reserve, Sikkim, India. In: Arrawatia ML, Tambe S, editors. Biodiversity of Sikkim—exploring and conserving a global hotspot. Gangtok: Information and Public Relation Department; 2010. p. 301-15.
|
Sen S. Identification notes on Sikkim Yellow-Billed Blue Magpie. J Ben Nat Hist Soc. 1948;29:169-71.
|
Sen S. An ornithological visit to Changu. J Ben Nat Hist Soc. 1957;29:1-5.
|
Singh R, Kour DN, Ahmad F, Sahi DN. Species diversity, relative abundance and habitat use of the bird communities of Tehsil Chenani, District Udhampur, Jammu and Kashmir, India. Indian J Life Sci. 2013;2:81-90.
|
Stattersfield AJ, Crosby MJ, Long AJ, Wege DC. Endemic bird areas of the world: priorities for biodiversity conservation., BirdLife Conservation series No. 7Cambridge: BirdLife International; 1998.
|
Urfi AJ. Climate change and its impacts on Indian birds: monsoon phenology and monitoring heronry birds. Curr Sci. 2011;101:1140-2.
|
WWF. Mai Pokhari, Ilam: samrakchen ma dharma, sankirti ra paramparako mahatyo (in Nepali). Importance of religion, culture, and tradition in conservation (unofficial translation). Kathmandu: WWF-Nepal; 2007.
|
Yonzon PB. Opportunities in ecoregion based conservation in the Kanchenjunga region, eastern Nepal. Biodiversity assessment and conservation planning in Kanchenjunga mountain complex. Kathmandu: WWF-Nepal; 2000.
|
Abel Souriau, Jorma Sorjonen, Adam Petrusek, Tereza Petrusková. 2025: Local song evolution after three decades in a complex songster, the Thrush Nightingale. Avian Research, 16(1): 100224. DOI: 10.1016/j.avrs.2025.100224 | |
Monika Homolková, Petr Musil, Diego Pavón-Jordán, Dorota Gajdošová, Zuzana Musilová, Šárka Neužilová, Jan Zouhar. 2024: Changes in the adult sex ratio of six duck species breeding populations over two decades. Avian Research, 15(1): 100187. DOI: 10.1016/j.avrs.2024.100187 | |
Yanlin Cui, Yanan Tang, Sen Yang, Wei Wu, Xuesong Feng, Qiang Ma, Dongliang Niu, Jun Ma, Zhijun Ma. 2023: Changes in wintering Hooded Cranes and their habitats at Chongming Dongtan over the past 20 years. Avian Research, 14(1): 100083. DOI: 10.1016/j.avrs.2023.100083 | |
Fernando Machado-Stredel, Benedictus Freeman, Daniel Jiménez-Garcia, Marlon E. Cobos, Claudia Nuñez-Penichet, Laura Jiménez, Ed Komp, Utku Perktas, Ali Khalighifar, Kate Ingenloff, Walter Tapondjou, Thilina de Silva, Sumudu Fernando, Luis Osorio-Olvera, A. Townsend Peterson. 2022: On the potential of documenting decadal-scale avifaunal change from before-and-after comparisons of museum and observational data across North America. Avian Research, 13(1): 100005. DOI: 10.1016/j.avrs.2022.100005 | |
Peter Capainolo, Utku Perktaş, Mark D. E. Fellowes. 2021: Rapid range expansion predicted for the Common Grackle (Quiscalus quiscula) in the near future under climate change scenarios. Avian Research, 12(1): 50. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-021-00285-2 | |
Jimmy Alexander Vargas-Puentes, Luis Alejandro Arias-Sosa, Carolina Ramos-Montaño. 2021: Song divergence indicates an unclear relationship between the Neotropical and Nearctic Horned Larks. Avian Research, 12(1): 16. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-021-00251-y | |
Eunjae Lee, Junghee Sagong, Yohan Lee. 2020: Influence of land use change on the waterbird community of Sihwa Lake, Republic of Korea. Avian Research, 11(1): 36. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-020-00221-w | |
Daisuke Nomi, Teru Yuta, Itsuro Koizumi. 2018: Seasonal change in sexual differences in nestling size and survival: a framework to evaluate sex-dependent environmental sensitivity in the wild. Avian Research, 9(1): 10. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-018-0102-0 | |
Anders Pape Møller. 2015: The allometry of number of feathers in birds changes seasonally. Avian Research, 6(1): 2. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-015-0012-3 | |
Hongxing JIANG, Fawen QIAN, Chunyue LIU, Xiaoming LI, Yunqiu HOU, Guogang ZHANG, Ming DAI, Dongping LIU. 2012: Impact of marsh changes on breeding cranes in Sanjiang Plain, northeastern China. Avian Research, 3(3): 165-179. DOI: 10.5122/cbirds.2012.0026 |
Cuckoo | Major hosts |
Pallid Cuckoo (Cacomantis pallidus) |
Red Wattlebird (Anthochaera carunculata), Yellow-throated Miner (Manorina flavigula), Lichenostomus spp., Black-headed Honeyeater (Melithreptus affinis) |
Fan-tailed Cuckoo (Cacomantis flabelliformis) |
White-browed Scrubwren (Sericornis frontalis), Brown Thornbill (Acanthiza pusilla), Inland Thornbill (Acanthiza apicalis) |
Brush Cuckoo (Cacomantis variolosus) |
Ramsayornis spp., Scarlet Robin (Petroica boodang), Leaden Flycatcher (Myiagra rubecula), Grey Fantail (Rhipidura fuligonosa) |
Chestnut-breasted Cuckoo (Cacomantis castaneiventris) |
Large-billed Scrubwren (Sericornis magnirostra), Tropical Scrubwren (Sericornis beccarii), Lovely Fairy-wren (Malurus amabilis) |
Black-eared Cuckoo (Chalcites osculans) |
Redthroat (Pyrrholaemus brunneus), Speckled Warbler (Chthonicola sagittata) |
Horsfield's Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites basalis) | Fairy-wrens (Malurus spp.) |
Shining Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites lucidus) |
Thornbills (Acanthiza spp.) |
Little Bronze-cuckoo (Chalcites minutillus) |
Gerygones (Gerygone spp.) |
Pacific Koel (Eudynamis scolopacea) |
Red Wattlebird (Anthochaera carunculata), Philemon spp., Magpie-lark (Grallina cyanoleuca), Figbird (Sphecotheres viridis) |
Channel-billed Cuckoo (Scythrops novaehollandiae) |
Pied Currawong (Strepera graculina), Corvus spp. |
Oriental cuckoo (Cuculus optatus |
Non-breeding vagrant |