Lyubov Malinovskaya, Elena Shnaider, Pavel Borodin, Anna Torgasheva. 2018: Karyotypes and recombination patterns of the Common Swift (Apus apus Linnaeus, 1758) and Eurasian Hobby (Falco subbuteo Linnaeus, 1758). Avian Research, 9(1): 4. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-018-0096-7
Citation: Lyubov Malinovskaya, Elena Shnaider, Pavel Borodin, Anna Torgasheva. 2018: Karyotypes and recombination patterns of the Common Swift (Apus apus Linnaeus, 1758) and Eurasian Hobby (Falco subbuteo Linnaeus, 1758). Avian Research, 9(1): 4. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-018-0096-7

Karyotypes and recombination patterns of the Common Swift (Apus apus Linnaeus, 1758) and Eurasian Hobby (Falco subbuteo Linnaeus, 1758)

Funds: 

the Russian Foundation for Basic Research Grant# 16-04-00087

the Federal Agency for Scientifc Organizations via the Institute of Cytology and Genetics Grant # 0324-2018-0019

The funding bodies play no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis 

interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript 

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Anna Torgasheva, torgasheva@bionet.nsc.ru

  • Received Date: 06 Dec 2017
  • Accepted Date: 13 Jan 2018
  • Available Online: 24 Apr 2022
  • Publish Date: 01 Feb 2018
  • Background 

    Meiotic recombination is an important source of genetic variability. Studies on mammals demonstrate a substantial interspecies variation in overall recombination rate, which is dependent mainly on chromosome (2n) and chromosome arm number (FN). Bird karyotypes are very conservative with 2n being about 78-82 and FN being 80-90 in most species. However, some families such as Apodidae (swifts) and Falconidae (falcons) show a substantial karyotypic variation. In this study, we describe the somatic and pachytene karyotypes of the male Common Swift (Apus apus) and the pachytene karyotype of the male Eurasian Hobby (Falco subbuteo) and estimate the overall number and distribution of recombination events along the chromosomes of these species.

    Methods 

    The somatic karyotype was examined in bone marrow cells. Pachytene chromosome spreads were prepared from spermatocytes of adult males. Synaptonemal complexes and mature recombination nodules were visualized with antibodies to SYCP3 and MLH1 proteins correspondingly.

    Results 

    The karyotype of the Common Swift consists of three metacentric, three submetacentric and two telocentric macrochromosomes and 31 telocentric microchromosomes (2n = 78; FN = 90). It differs from the karyotypes of related Apodidae species described previously. The karyotype of the Eurasian Hobby contains one metacentric and 13 telocentric macrochromosomes and one metacentric and ten telocentric microchromosomes (2n = 50; FN = 54) and is similar to that described previously in 2n, but differs for macrochromosome morphology. Despite an about 40% difference in 2n and FN, these species have almost the same number of recombination nodules per genome: 51.4 ± 4.3 in the swift and 51.1 ± 6.7 in the hobby. The distribution of the recombination nodules along the macrochromosomes was extremely polarized in the Common Swift and was rather even in the Eurasian Hobby.

    Conclusions 

    This study adds two more species to the short list of birds in which the number and distribution of recombination nodules have been examined. Our data confirm that recombination rate in birds is substantially higher than that in mammals, but shows rather a low interspecies variability. Even a substantial reduction in chromosome number does not lead to any substantial decrease in recombination rate. More data from different taxa are required to draw statistically supported conclusions about the evolution of recombination in birds.

  • We are pleased to be responsible guest editors for the two special issues of Chinese Birds (Vol. 3, No. 4, 2012 and Vol. 4, No. 1, 2013), entitled "Avian Brood Parasitism — a Growing Research Area in Behavioral Ecology". The goal of the two special issues is to publish accumulated knowledge and some of the recent developments in the fascinating research occurring in avian brood parasitism and to stimulate further research in this attractive field.

    The papers in the two special issues are based on "The 3rd International Conference on Avian Brood Parasitism" that was held at Hainan Normal University, China, during November 15–19, 2012. Here, more than 40 scientists on avian brood parasitism met and shared their knowledge. These scientists came from all continents including Africa, Australia, North and South America, Asia and Europe. Thirty-three talks were given during the conference on long term studies, host defences, molecular approaches and theoretical models, brood parasite adaptations and finally coevolution and general issues. A broad range of avian brood parasite taxa were embraced, although most papers were given on various cuckoos and cowbirds. We share some of the discussions from the conference with the readers of Chinese Birds in the two special issues.

    Although, particularly the knowledge about the Common Cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) is very old (at least 2000–3000 years old), we know that Aristotle (384–322 BC) stated that "it lays its eggs in the nest of smaller birds after devouring these birds' eggs". The cuckoo was referred to in unscientific terms by Moses in the Old Testament. Moses regarded the cuckoo as an odious evil — equal to vultures and other birds of prey. It is obvious that Moses regarded the cuckoo as living with immorality. Cuckoo terminology was also used by famous writers as William Shakespeare and Henrik Ibsen. It is also involved in the English language — a cuckold is a married man with an adulterous wife — thus the cuckolded man is raising another man's child. The world famous actor Jack Nicholson received his first Academy Award in "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest"; a 1975 drama film directed by Miloš Forman and based on the 1962 novel One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest by Ken Kesey. The Chinese name of the cuckoo, "杜鹃" or "布谷鸟", which means the farming season in spring, is found as early as in the Kingdom of Han (221–263). Since then, the cuckoos have often been found in many Chinese poems and folklores over the last 1800 years. In Japan, more than 4500 poems including cuckoos have been written over the last 1200 years. Unlike in the English language, cuckoos have never been adopted into the Chinese language as "cuckold" or "cuckolded", or been compared with birds of prey.

    However, despite such interest for cuckoos even outside the field of science, the scientific field of avian brood parasitism is still a small science — in comparison to the cuckoo's status in general literature. We might therefore wonder why there has been such low interest for these fascinating birds and the evolutionary system they are part of. It is such a good model system for studying coevolution or evolutionary processes in general. For example, in China, there are up to 17 parasitic cuckoo species (Zheng, 2011), but so far there has been little information on their breeding biology and host use (Yang et al., 2012). A search on Web of Science reveals around 1700 papers on avian brood parasitism during 1970–2012. As a comparison there were 1352 published papers on sexual selection in the year 2011 only.

    An avian brood parasite lays its egg in the nest of other bird species. The host incubates the egg and raise the chick. An obvious question is thus "how should the host respond?" and "how should the brood parasite counter the host responses?" This is a base for a coevolutionary process that we as scientists on avian brood parasitism focus on and term coevolutionary arms races. In this first issue we show examples of brood parasite adaptations as why they lay strong-shelled eggs (Antonov et al.), their visual sensitivity (Aidala et al.), host adaptations (Samas et al.; Lee and Jabłoński), as well as host-parasite interactions (Møller and Soler; Sealy and Underwood; Moskat et al.; Avilés and Parejo).

    The conference as well as the two special issues is devoted to five persons who have been especially important to our field over the last 30–40 years, namely Stephen I. Rothstein, Spencer G. Sealy, Arne Moksnes, Nicholas B. Davies and Anders Pape Møller.

    We would like to acknowledge Hainan Normal University (HNU), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), China Ornithological Society (COS) and Beijing Forestry University for their roles in initiating the two special issues. We thank many reviewers for their kind revision of one or several of the papers in the two special issues, Peter Adamík, Jesús Avilés, Frode Fossøy, Tomáš Grim, Daniel Hanley, Mark Hauber, Rebecca Kilner, Naomi Langmore, Jin-Won Lee, Bruce Lyon, Anders P. Møller, Csaba Moskát, Spencer G. Sealy, Juan J. Soler, Fugo Takasu, Ning Wang and Canchao Yang.

    We would furthermore, like to thank Zhengwang Zhang, Ping Ding, Fumin Lei, Yuehua Sun and Pengjun Cheng, for their valuable support. We would also like to thank Guangmei Zheng, the Editor-in-Chief, Chinese Birds, for making the two special issues possible.

  • Anderson LK, Reeves A, Webb LM, Ashley T.1999. Distribution of crossing over on mouse synaptonemal complexes using immunofluorescent localization of MLH1 protein. Genetics, 151:1569-79.
    Aslam ML, Bastiaansen JWM, Crooijmans RPMA, Vereijken A, Megens H-J, Groenen MAM.2010. A SNP based linkage map of the turkey genome reveals multiple intrachromosomal rearrangements between the turkey and chicken genomes. BMC Genom, 11:647.
    Backström N, Forstmeier W, Schielzeth H, Mellenius H, Nam K, Bolund E, Webster MT, Öst T, Schneider M, Kempenaers B, Ellegren H.2010. The recombination landscape of the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata genome. Genome Res, 20(4):485-95.
    Berchowitz LE, Copenhaver GP.2010. Genetic interference: don't stand so close to me. Curr Genom, 11:91-102.
    Borodin PM, Basheva EA, Zhelezova AI.2009. Immunocytological analysis of meiotic recombination in the American mink (Mustela vison). Anim Genet, 40:235-8.
    Calderon PL, Pigozzi MI.2006. MLH1-focus mapping in birds shows equal recombination between sexes and diversity of crossover patterns. Chromosome Res, 14:605-12.
    Capilla L, Garcia Caldés M, Ruiz-Herrera A.2016. Mammalian meiotic recombination: a toolbox for genome evolution. Cytogenet Genome Res, 150:1-6.
    Christidis L. Animal cytogenetics 4: Chordata 3; B, Aves. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger; 1990.
    Dapper AL, Payseur BA. Connecting theory and data to understand recombination rate evolution. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0469.
    Dawson DA, Åkesson M, Burke T, Pemberton JM, Slate J, Hansson B.2007. Gene order and recombination rate in homologous chromosome regions of the chicken and a passerine bird. Mol Biol Evol, 24:1537-52.
    del Priore L, Pigozzi MI.2017. Broad-scale recombination pattern in the primitive bird Rhea americana (Ratites, Palaeognathae). PLoS ONE, 12:e0187549.
    Dumont BL, Payseur BA.2008. Evolution of the genomic rate of recombination in mammals. Evolution, 62:276-94.
    Frohlich J, Vozdova M, Kubickova S, Cernohorska H, Sebestova H, Rubes J.2015. Variation of meiotic recombination rates and MLH1 foci distribution in spermatocytes of cattle, sheep and goats. Cytogenet Genome Res, 146:211-21.
    Graphodatsky AS, Sablina OV, Meyer MN, Malikov VG, Isakova EA, Trifonov VA, Polyakov AV, Lushnikova TP, Vorobieva NV, Serdyukova NA, Perelman PL, Borodin PM, Benda P, Frynta D, Leikepová L, Munclinger P, Piálek J, Sádlová J, Zima J.2000. Comparative cytogenetics of hamsters of the genus Calomyscus. Cytogenet Genome Res, 88:296-304.
    Gregory TR. Animal genome size database. 2017. . com. Accessed 9 Nov 2017
    Griffin D, Burt DW.2014. All chromosomes great and small: 10 years on. Chromosome Res, 22:1-6.
    Groenen MAM, Wahlberg P, Foglio M, Cheng HH, Megens H-J, Crooijmans RPMA, Besnier F, Lathrop M, Muir WM, Wong GKS, Gut I, Andersson L.2009. A high-density SNP-based linkage map of the chicken genome reveals sequence features correlated with recombination rate. Genome Res, 19:510-9.
    Hansson B, Ljungqvist M, Dawson DA, Mueller JC, Olano-Marin J, Ellegren H, Nilsson J-Å.2010. Avian genome evolution: insights from a linkage map of the blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus). Heredity, 104:67-78.
    Jaari S, Li M-H, Merilä J.2009. A first-generation microsatellite-based genetic linkage map of the Siberian jay (Perisoreus infaustus): insights into avian genome evolution. BMC Genom, 10:1.
    Jetz W, Thomas GH, Joy JB, Hartmann K, Mooers AO.2012. The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature, 491:444-8.
    Kasai F, Garcia C, Arruga MV, Ferguson-Smith MA.2003. Chromosome homology between chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) and the red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa); evidence of the occurrence of a neocentromere during evolution. Cytogenet Genome Res, 102:326-30.
    Kawakami T, Smeds L, Backström N, Husby A, Qvarnström A, Mugal CF, Olason P, Ellegren H.2014. A high-density linkage map enables a second-generation collared flycatcher genome assembly and reveals the patterns of avian recombination rate variation and chromosomal evolution. Mol Ecol, 23:4035-58.
    Kleckner N, Storlazzi A, Zickler D.2003. Coordinate variation in meiotic pachytene SC length and total crossover/chiasma frequency under conditions of constant DNA length. Trends Genet, 19:623-8.
    Lisachov AP, Malinovskaya LP, Druzyaka AV, Borodin PM, Torgasheva AA. Synapsis and recombination of autosomes and sex chromosomes in two terns (Sternidae, Charadriiformes, Aves). Vavilovskii Zhurnal Genet Selektsii. 2017a;21:259-68 (in Russian).
    Lisachov AP, Trifonov VA, Giovannotti M, Ferguson-Smith MA, Borodin PM. Heteromorphism of "homomorphic" sex chromosomes in two anole species (Squamata, Dactyloidae) revealed by synaptonemal complex analysis. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2017b;151:89-95.
    Lisachov AP, Trifonov VA, Giovannotti M, Ferguson-Smith MA, Borodin PM. Immunocytological analysis of meiotic recombination in two anole lizards (Squamata, Dactyloidae). Comp Cytogenet. 2017c;11:129-41.
    Lisachov AP, Zadesenets KS, Rubtsov NB, Borodin PM. Sex chromosome synapsis and recombination in male guppies. Zebrafish, 2015, 12:174-80.
    Moens PB.2006. Zebrafish: chiasmata and interference. Genome, 49:205-8.
    Nishida C, Ishijima J, Kosaka A, Tanabe H, Habermann FA, Griffin DK, Matsuda Y.2008. Characterization of chromosome structures of Falconinae (Falconidae, Falconiformes, Aves) by chromosome painting and delineation of chromosome rearrangements during their differentiation. Chromosome Res, 16:171-81.
    Pardo-Manuel de Villena F, de Sapienza C.2001. Recombination is proportional to the number of chromosome arms in mammals. Mamm Genome, 12:318-22.
    Peters AH, Plug AW, van Vugt MJ, de Boer P.1997. A drying-down technique for the spreading of mammalian meiocytes from the male and female germline. Chromosome Res, 5:66-8.
    Peterson DG, Stack SM, Healy JL, Donohoe BS, Anderson LK.1994. The relationship between synaptonemal complex length and genome size in four vertebrate classes (Osteicthyes, Reptilia, Aves, Mammalia). Chromosome Res, 2:153-62.
    Pigozzi MI.2001. Distribution of MLH1 foci on the synaptonemal complexes of chicken oocytes. Cytogenet Cell Genet, 95:129-33.
    Pigozzi MI.2016. The chromosomes of birds during meiosis. Cytogenet Genome Res, 150:128-38.
    Pigozzi MI, del Priore L.2016. Meiotic recombination analysis in female ducks (Anas platyrhynchos). Genetica, 144:307-12.
    Pigozzi MI, Solari AJ.1999. Equal frequencies of recombination nodules in both sexes of the pigeon suggest a basic difference with eutherian mammals. Genome, 42:315-21.
    Reeves A.2001. MicroMeasure: a new computer program for the collection and analysis of cytogenetic data. Genome, 44:439-43.
    Ritz KR, Noor MAF, Singh ND.2017. Variation in recombination rate: adaptive or not? Trends Genet, 33:364-74.
    Ross J, McNulty S, Sullivan B. The epigenetics of centromere function. In: Chadwick BP, editor. Epigenetics. Norfolk: Caister Academic Press; 2015. p. 133-66.
    Scanes CG. Sturkie's avian physiology. 6th ed. London: Academic Press; 2014.
    Segura J, Ferretti L, Ramos-Onsins S, Capilla L, FarréM Reis F, Oliver-Bonet M, Fernández-Bellón H, Garcia F, Garcia-Caldés M, Robinson TJ, Ruiz-Herrera A.2013. Evolution of recombination in eutherian mammals: insights into mechanisms that affect recombination rates and crossover interference. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci, 280:1945.
    Skinner BM, Griffin DK.2012. Intrachromosomal rearrangements in avian genome evolution: evidence for regions prone to breakpoints. Heredity, 108:37-41.
    Stack SM.1984. Heterochromatin, the synaptonemal complex and crossing over. J Cell Sci, 71:159-76.
    Stapley J, Ferretti L, Ramos-Onsins S, Capilla L, Farré M, Reis F, Oliver-Bonet M, Fernández-Bellón H, Garcia F, Garcia-Caldés M, Robinson TJ, Ruiz-Herrera A.2017. Variation in recombination frequency and distribution across eukaryotes: patterns and processes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B, 372:20160455.
    Torgasheva AA, Borodin PM.2017. Immunocytological analysis of meiotic recombination in the gray goose (Anser anser). Cytogenet Genome Res, 151:27-35.
    Torres RA, Ribeiro J, Adam ML.2004. Genetic discontinuity and evolutionary scenario among Neotropical and Old World swift species (Aves: Apodiformes: Apodidae). Caryologia, 57:177-83.
    van Oers K, Santure AW, De Cauwer I, van Bers NEM, Crooijmans RPMA, Sheldon BC, Visser ME, Slate J, Groenen MAM.2014. Replicated high-density genetic maps of two great tit populations reveal fine-scale genomic departures from sex-equal recombination rates. Heredity, 112:307-16.
    Wang ML, Chen FY.1998. Study on karyotype of Hobby (Falco subbuteo) and Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus). J Forest Res, 9:108-10.
    Wright NA, Gregory TR, Witt CC. Metabolic “engines” of flight drive genome size reduction in birds. Proc R Soc B. 2014. .
    Yadav JS, Arora RB, Yadav AS.1995. Karyotypes of two species of Indian birds and localization of nucleolus organizer regions. Cytobios, 82:159-69.
  • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(11)

    1. Susan E Johnston, Brandon Gaut. Understanding the Genetic Basis of Variation in Meiotic Recombination: Past, Present, and Future. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2024, 41(7) DOI:10.1093/molbev/msae112
    2. John B McAuley, Bertrand Servin, Hamish A Burnett, et al. The Genetic Architecture of Recombination Rates is Polygenic and Differs Between the Sexes in Wild House Sparrows (Passer domesticus). Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2024, 41(9) DOI:10.1093/molbev/msae179
    3. Karen Bascón-Cardozo, Andrea Bours, Georg Manthey, et al. Fine-Scale Map Reveals Highly Variable Recombination Rates Associated with Genomic Features in the Eurasian Blackcap. Genome Biology and Evolution, 2024, 16(1) DOI:10.1093/gbe/evad233
    4. Alexandros Topaloudis, Tristan Cumer, Eléonore Lavanchy, et al. The recombination landscape of the barn owl, from families to populations. GENETICS, 2024. DOI:10.1093/genetics/iyae190
    5. Ekaterina Grishko, Lyubov Malinovskaya, Anastasia Slobodchikova, et al. Cytological Analysis of Crossover Frequency and Distribution in Male Meiosis of Cardueline Finches (Fringillidae, Aves). Animals, 2023, 13(23): 3624. DOI:10.3390/ani13233624
    6. M.I. Pigozzi. A BIRD´S-EYE VIEW OF CHROMOSOMES DURING MEIOTIC PROPHASE I. Journal of Basic and Applied Genetics, 2022, 33(1): 27. DOI:10.35407/bag.2022.33.01.02
    7. Tiago Marafiga Degrandi, Ivanete de Oliveira Furo, Edivaldo Herculano Correia de Oliveira, et al. Comparative chromosome painting in hummingbirds (Trochilidae). Genetics and Molecular Biology, 2020, 43(4) DOI:10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2020-0162
    8. Lucía del Priore, María Inés Pigozzi, Jennifer C. Fung. MLH1 focus mapping in the guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) give insights into the crossover landscapes in birds. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15(10): e0240245. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0240245
    9. Anna A. Torgasheva, Lyubov P. Malinovskaya, Kira S. Zadesenets, et al. Germline-restricted chromosome (GRC) is widespread among songbirds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2019, 116(24): 11845. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1817373116
    10. Lyubov P. Malinovskaya, Katerina V. Tishakova, Natalia A. Volkova, et al. Interbreed variation in meiotic recombination rate and distribution in the domestic chicken <i>Gallus gallus</i>. Archives Animal Breeding, 2019, 62(2): 403. DOI:10.5194/aab-62-403-2019
    11. Georgy A Semenov, Ekaterina A Basheva, Pavel M Borodin, et al. High rate of meiotic recombination and its implications for intricate speciation patterns in the white wagtail (Motacilla alba). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2018. DOI:10.1093/biolinnean/bly133

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Figures(4)  /  Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (236) PDF downloads (6) Cited by(11)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return