Citation: | Lyubov Malinovskaya, Elena Shnaider, Pavel Borodin, Anna Torgasheva. 2018: Karyotypes and recombination patterns of the Common Swift (Apus apus Linnaeus, 1758) and Eurasian Hobby (Falco subbuteo Linnaeus, 1758). Avian Research, 9(1): 4. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-018-0096-7 |
Meiotic recombination is an important source of genetic variability. Studies on mammals demonstrate a substantial interspecies variation in overall recombination rate, which is dependent mainly on chromosome (2n) and chromosome arm number (FN). Bird karyotypes are very conservative with 2n being about 78-82 and FN being 80-90 in most species. However, some families such as Apodidae (swifts) and Falconidae (falcons) show a substantial karyotypic variation. In this study, we describe the somatic and pachytene karyotypes of the male Common Swift (Apus apus) and the pachytene karyotype of the male Eurasian Hobby (Falco subbuteo) and estimate the overall number and distribution of recombination events along the chromosomes of these species.
The somatic karyotype was examined in bone marrow cells. Pachytene chromosome spreads were prepared from spermatocytes of adult males. Synaptonemal complexes and mature recombination nodules were visualized with antibodies to SYCP3 and MLH1 proteins correspondingly.
The karyotype of the Common Swift consists of three metacentric, three submetacentric and two telocentric macrochromosomes and 31 telocentric microchromosomes (2n = 78; FN = 90). It differs from the karyotypes of related Apodidae species described previously. The karyotype of the Eurasian Hobby contains one metacentric and 13 telocentric macrochromosomes and one metacentric and ten telocentric microchromosomes (2n = 50; FN = 54) and is similar to that described previously in 2n, but differs for macrochromosome morphology. Despite an about 40% difference in 2n and FN, these species have almost the same number of recombination nodules per genome: 51.4 ± 4.3 in the swift and 51.1 ± 6.7 in the hobby. The distribution of the recombination nodules along the macrochromosomes was extremely polarized in the Common Swift and was rather even in the Eurasian Hobby.
This study adds two more species to the short list of birds in which the number and distribution of recombination nodules have been examined. Our data confirm that recombination rate in birds is substantially higher than that in mammals, but shows rather a low interspecies variability. Even a substantial reduction in chromosome number does not lead to any substantial decrease in recombination rate. More data from different taxa are required to draw statistically supported conclusions about the evolution of recombination in birds.
We are pleased to be responsible guest editors for the two special issues of Chinese Birds (Vol. 3, No. 4, 2012 and Vol. 4, No. 1, 2013), entitled "Avian Brood Parasitism — a Growing Research Area in Behavioral Ecology". The goal of the two special issues is to publish accumulated knowledge and some of the recent developments in the fascinating research occurring in avian brood parasitism and to stimulate further research in this attractive field.
The papers in the two special issues are based on "The 3rd International Conference on Avian Brood Parasitism" that was held at Hainan Normal University, China, during November 15–19, 2012. Here, more than 40 scientists on avian brood parasitism met and shared their knowledge. These scientists came from all continents including Africa, Australia, North and South America, Asia and Europe. Thirty-three talks were given during the conference on long term studies, host defences, molecular approaches and theoretical models, brood parasite adaptations and finally coevolution and general issues. A broad range of avian brood parasite taxa were embraced, although most papers were given on various cuckoos and cowbirds. We share some of the discussions from the conference with the readers of Chinese Birds in the two special issues.
Although, particularly the knowledge about the Common Cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) is very old (at least 2000–3000 years old), we know that Aristotle (384–322 BC) stated that "it lays its eggs in the nest of smaller birds after devouring these birds' eggs". The cuckoo was referred to in unscientific terms by Moses in the Old Testament. Moses regarded the cuckoo as an odious evil — equal to vultures and other birds of prey. It is obvious that Moses regarded the cuckoo as living with immorality. Cuckoo terminology was also used by famous writers as William Shakespeare and Henrik Ibsen. It is also involved in the English language — a cuckold is a married man with an adulterous wife — thus the cuckolded man is raising another man's child. The world famous actor Jack Nicholson received his first Academy Award in "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest"; a 1975 drama film directed by Miloš Forman and based on the 1962 novel One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest by Ken Kesey. The Chinese name of the cuckoo, "杜鹃" or "布谷鸟", which means the farming season in spring, is found as early as in the Kingdom of Han (221–263). Since then, the cuckoos have often been found in many Chinese poems and folklores over the last 1800 years. In Japan, more than 4500 poems including cuckoos have been written over the last 1200 years. Unlike in the English language, cuckoos have never been adopted into the Chinese language as "cuckold" or "cuckolded", or been compared with birds of prey.
However, despite such interest for cuckoos even outside the field of science, the scientific field of avian brood parasitism is still a small science — in comparison to the cuckoo's status in general literature. We might therefore wonder why there has been such low interest for these fascinating birds and the evolutionary system they are part of. It is such a good model system for studying coevolution or evolutionary processes in general. For example, in China, there are up to 17 parasitic cuckoo species (Zheng, 2011), but so far there has been little information on their breeding biology and host use (Yang et al., 2012). A search on Web of Science reveals around 1700 papers on avian brood parasitism during 1970–2012. As a comparison there were 1352 published papers on sexual selection in the year 2011 only.
An avian brood parasite lays its egg in the nest of other bird species. The host incubates the egg and raise the chick. An obvious question is thus "how should the host respond?" and "how should the brood parasite counter the host responses?" This is a base for a coevolutionary process that we as scientists on avian brood parasitism focus on and term coevolutionary arms races. In this first issue we show examples of brood parasite adaptations as why they lay strong-shelled eggs (Antonov et al.), their visual sensitivity (Aidala et al.), host adaptations (Samas et al.; Lee and Jabłoński), as well as host-parasite interactions (Møller and Soler; Sealy and Underwood; Moskat et al.; Avilés and Parejo).
The conference as well as the two special issues is devoted to five persons who have been especially important to our field over the last 30–40 years, namely Stephen I. Rothstein, Spencer G. Sealy, Arne Moksnes, Nicholas B. Davies and Anders Pape Møller.
We would like to acknowledge Hainan Normal University (HNU), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), China Ornithological Society (COS) and Beijing Forestry University for their roles in initiating the two special issues. We thank many reviewers for their kind revision of one or several of the papers in the two special issues, Peter Adamík, Jesús Avilés, Frode Fossøy, Tomáš Grim, Daniel Hanley, Mark Hauber, Rebecca Kilner, Naomi Langmore, Jin-Won Lee, Bruce Lyon, Anders P. Møller, Csaba Moskát, Spencer G. Sealy, Juan J. Soler, Fugo Takasu, Ning Wang and Canchao Yang.
We would furthermore, like to thank Zhengwang Zhang, Ping Ding, Fumin Lei, Yuehua Sun and Pengjun Cheng, for their valuable support. We would also like to thank Guangmei Zheng, the Editor-in-Chief, Chinese Birds, for making the two special issues possible.
1. | Susan E Johnston, Brandon Gaut. Understanding the Genetic Basis of Variation in Meiotic Recombination: Past, Present, and Future. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2024, 41(7) DOI:10.1093/molbev/msae112 |
2. | John B McAuley, Bertrand Servin, Hamish A Burnett, et al. The Genetic Architecture of Recombination Rates is Polygenic and Differs Between the Sexes in Wild House Sparrows (Passer domesticus). Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2024, 41(9) DOI:10.1093/molbev/msae179 |
3. | Karen Bascón-Cardozo, Andrea Bours, Georg Manthey, et al. Fine-Scale Map Reveals Highly Variable Recombination Rates Associated with Genomic Features in the Eurasian Blackcap. Genome Biology and Evolution, 2024, 16(1) DOI:10.1093/gbe/evad233 |
4. | Alexandros Topaloudis, Tristan Cumer, Eléonore Lavanchy, et al. The recombination landscape of the barn owl, from families to populations. GENETICS, 2024. DOI:10.1093/genetics/iyae190 |
5. | Ekaterina Grishko, Lyubov Malinovskaya, Anastasia Slobodchikova, et al. Cytological Analysis of Crossover Frequency and Distribution in Male Meiosis of Cardueline Finches (Fringillidae, Aves). Animals, 2023, 13(23): 3624. DOI:10.3390/ani13233624 |
6. | M.I. Pigozzi. A BIRD´S-EYE VIEW OF CHROMOSOMES DURING MEIOTIC PROPHASE I. Journal of Basic and Applied Genetics, 2022, 33(1): 27. DOI:10.35407/bag.2022.33.01.02 |
7. | Tiago Marafiga Degrandi, Ivanete de Oliveira Furo, Edivaldo Herculano Correia de Oliveira, et al. Comparative chromosome painting in hummingbirds (Trochilidae). Genetics and Molecular Biology, 2020, 43(4) DOI:10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2020-0162 |
8. | Lucía del Priore, María Inés Pigozzi, Jennifer C. Fung. MLH1 focus mapping in the guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) give insights into the crossover landscapes in birds. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15(10): e0240245. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0240245 |
9. | Anna A. Torgasheva, Lyubov P. Malinovskaya, Kira S. Zadesenets, et al. Germline-restricted chromosome (GRC) is widespread among songbirds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2019, 116(24): 11845. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1817373116 |
10. | Lyubov P. Malinovskaya, Katerina V. Tishakova, Natalia A. Volkova, et al. Interbreed variation in meiotic recombination rate and distribution in the domestic chicken <i>Gallus gallus</i>. Archives Animal Breeding, 2019, 62(2): 403. DOI:10.5194/aab-62-403-2019 |
11. | Georgy A Semenov, Ekaterina A Basheva, Pavel M Borodin, et al. High rate of meiotic recombination and its implications for intricate speciation patterns in the white wagtail (Motacilla alba). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2018. DOI:10.1093/biolinnean/bly133 |