
Citation: | Jente Ottenburghs, Robert H. S. Kraus, Pim van Hooft, Sipke E. van Wieren, Ronald C. Ydenberg, Herbert H. T. Prins. 2017: Avian introgression in the genomic era. Avian Research, 8(1): 30. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-017-0088-z |
Introgression, the incorporation of genetic material from one (sub)species into the gene pool of another by means of hybridization and backcrossing, is a common phenomenon in birds and can provide important insights into the speciation process. In the last decade, the toolkit for studying introgression has expanded together with the development of molecular markers. In this review, we explore how genomic data, the most recent step in this methodological progress, impacts different aspects in the study of avian introgression. First, the detection of hybrids and backcrosses has improved dramatically. The most widely used software package is STRUCTURE. Phylogenetic discordance (i.e. different loci resulting in discordant gene trees) is another means for the detection of introgression, although it should be regarded as a starting point for further analyses, not as a definitive proof of introgression. Specifically, disentangling introgression from other biological processes, such as incomplete lineage sorting, remains a challenging endeavour, although new techniques, such as the D-statistic, are being developed. In addition, phylogenetics might require a shift from trees to networks. Second, the study of hybrid zones by means of geographical or genomic cline analysis has led to important insights into the complex interplay between hybridization and speciation. However, because each hybrid zone study is just a single snapshot of a complex and continuously changing interaction, hybrid zones should be studied across different temporal and/or spatial scales. A third powerful tool is the genome scan. The debate on which evolutionary processes underlie the genomic landscape is still ongoing, as is the question whether loci involved in reproductive isolation cluster together in 'islands of speciation' or whether they are scattered throughout the genome. Exploring genomic landscapes across the avian tree of life will be an exciting field for further research. Finally, the findings from these different methods should be incorporated into specific speciation scenarios, which can consequently be tested using a modelling approach. All in all, this genomic perspective on avian hybridization and speciation will further our understanding in evolution in general.
With complex geographical and climatic conditions, the forest areas in southeastern Tibet are home to many species of Galliformes. Previous fauna surveys in the region, either by foreigners during earlier times (Bailey, 1914; Battye, 1935; Ludlow and Kinnear, 1944) or by Chinese ornithologists since the 1960s (Cheng et al., 1983), only provided general information about the occurrence of Galliforme species. To understand the conservation status of these species in primary forests, we should have more quantitative data on habitat use and population abundance. Moreover, Galliforme species are susceptible to habitat change and are often treated as indicators of ecosystem health (Fuller et al., 2000; Fuller and Garson 2000; Storch, 2000). Data from areas with original ecosystems may provide a baseline for assessing the degree of habitat degradation in contrast to these highly human-disturbed areas.
From May to October 1995, I investigated the habitat use of Galliformes in the upper Yigong Zangbu River, an area never explored by biologists. A further survey aimed at assessing the conservation status of the taxa in the area was made in May 2001.
Fieldwork was carried out in the Sawang area (93°39′E, 32°24′N; Fig. 1), in Jiali county, southeastern Tibet, from May to October in 1995. Topographically, the study area is characterized by high mountains and deep canyons, with elevations ranging from 3700 to 6870 m, where most valley bottoms are less than 100 m wide. My survey area covered 32 km of the main valley and 14 km of three branches of the valley (Fig. 1). The vegetation is still original and varies vertically. On north-facing slopes < 4300 m in elevation, plant communities in the forest are dominated by Halfour spruce (Picea likiangensis) and between 4300–4800 m, by forests and scrubs of Rhododendron spp.; on south-facing slopes, between 3700–4300 m, the forest is dominated by Hollyleaf-like oak (Quercus aquifolioldes) between 4200–4700 m, by Tibetan juniper (Sabina tibetica) and at elevations > 4700 m, by alpine scrubs and meadows.
Along the entire valley of 50 km, there are only five Tibetan villages, with a very low population density (one person per 100 km2). Farmland is restricted to the bottom of the mountains. The villagers cut the oaks near the foot of the mountains for firewood, resulting in secondary scrub oak forests.
Because the birds are shy in dense cover, I had few opportunities to catch sight of them. However, I found that feathers, fallen from their plumage, could survive for at least one month and were easy to identify in the field and distinguishable among species. The detection rate of feathers of each species in a defined habitat should be positively related with the number of birds and the time they spent in their habitat. Thus, encounter rates of molted feather samples were used as indicators of the relative abundance of Galliformes. The methodology of feather-counting was described by Lu and Zheng (2001). When collecting feather samples along the transects, I also noted individual birds, their flock size and membership. The data on individual sightings were provided in contrast to the results of feather-counting. I compared the flock size of each Galliforme species during the nesting period (late May to early July) to that in the chick-rearing period (mid-July to mid-October).
All of seven species of Galliformes in the study area were found on south-facing slopes and only two species, the Chinese Grouse (Bonasa sewerzowi) and the Blood Pheasant (Ithaginis cruentus) also appeared on north-facing slopes (Table 1). A hybrid of the White Eared-pheasant (Crossoptilon crossoptilon) × the Tibetan Eared-pheasant (C. harmani) was the most predominant component of the Galliforme community, followed by Blood Pheasants and Chinese Grouse. These three species were relatively well adapted to the various types of vegetation in the area. Two other forest-dependent species, the Snow Partridge (Lerwa lerwa) and the Pheasant Grouse (Tetraophasis obscurus), were limited to the upper part of the forests with relatively low population densities, while a third species, the Crimson-bellied Tragopan (Tragopan temminckii) was only rarely sighted. Two meadow-dependent species, the Tibetan Snow Cock (Tetraogallus tibetanus) and the Tibetan Partridge (Perdix hodgsoniae), were relatively uncommon.
Habitat | Elevation (m) | Survey time (h) | Chinese Grouse | Snow Partridge | Tibetan Snow Cock | Pheasant Grouse | Tibetan Partridge | Blood Pheasant | Crimson-bellied Tragopan | Hybrid Eared-pheasant |
Farmland | 3700−3800 | 46.0 | (0.04) | |||||||
South-facing slopes | ||||||||||
Secondary oak shrubs | 3700−3900 | 39.6 | 0.05 (0.03) | 0.81 (0.15) | ||||||
Oak forest | 3800−4300 | 82.2 | 0.02 (0.02) | 0.09 (0.04) | 0.02 (0.01) | 3.21 (0.34) | ||||
Shrub-meadow above tree line | 4300−4500 | 19.5 | 0.92 | |||||||
Juniper forests | 4200−4700 | 62.0 | 0.70 (0.13) | 0.03 (0.03) | 1.00 (1.00) | 0.03 (0.02) | 1.69 (0.27) | |||
Shrub-meadows above tree line | 4600−4900 | 25.5 | (0.04) | (0.04) | 0.75 (0.24) | |||||
North-facing slopes | ||||||||||
Spruce forests | 3700−4300 | 16.6 | 0.12 (0.12) | 0.18 (0.18) | ||||||
Rhododendron | 4300−4800 | 8.5 | 0.12 | |||||||
Shrub-meadows above tree line | 4600−4900 | 7.0 | ||||||||
The following provides further information about each species.
The Chinese Grouse: This survey discovered a new distribution of the species, which extends its range from 98°40′ to 93°39′E. In the survey area, often 2–5 birds (3.4 ± 0.3, n = 11) were encountered in their preferred habitat with streams and dense scrub, sometimes in small open plots in the forest, feeding or dusting. If suddenly disturbed, the birds fly up to nearby trees.
The Snow Partridge: In late June, three groups with five, five and six birds respectively were flushed from a juniper woodland close to the tree line, where their dusting sites were located. In late July, two birds were found in a scrub-grassland above the tree line.
The Tibetan Snow Cock: Because of limited time of investigation in its preferred habitat, i.e., high-elevation meadows with rocks, I only saw one group of seven birds. One young bird, caught, weighted 0.53 kg, suggesting that the date of egg-laying of this bird was early April.
The Pheasant Grouse: This bird limited its activities to the upper part of the forest dominated by oak but never moved out of the forest into the scrub-grassland above the tree line. If disturbed by dogs, this bird flew up to the top of trees. Its microhabitats consisted often of rocks and streams. Dusting sites beside a path visited by the birds were found at least three times.
The Tibetan Partridge: Despite considerable efforts in investigating this species in the alpine scrub-meadows, believed suitable for this bird, I did not manage to find a single bird there. Only one pair was continuously seen at the foot of the mountains from June through July.
The Blood Pheasant: The birds occurred in various habitats but their densities on south-facing slopes were higher than on north-facing slopes. They preferred microhabitats close to streams. Usually two birds (46.5%) (2.0 ± 0.3, ranging from 1–4, n = 11) remained together during the breeding season. I found in late September that these birds and Hybrid Eared-pheasants used the same dusting hollows. In winter, according to the villagers, flocks are formed of more than 10 individual birds, appearing at lower elevations.
The Crimson-bellied Tragopan: Only two single birds were found in an oak woodland and a dusting site in the juniper forest.
The Hybrid Eared-pheasant: This bird has the largest population among the Galliformes in the area and appeared in various habitats on south-facing slopes, with oak forests as its most preferred habitat. During the nesting period (May to July), flock size varied between 1 to 7 birds (2.9 ± 0.3, n = 43) and then increased (7.0 ± 1.0, 2–15, n = 14) during the brood-rearing period (August to October).
My results showed that the Galliforme species in the study area tended to avoid coniferous forests dominated by Balfour spruce, an environment widely encountered on the eastern Qinghai-Tibet plateau and preferred by many species of Galliformes (Cheng et al., 1978; Johnsgard, 1999). The reason is thought to be that the climate in the woodland is so humid that ground-dwellers have difficulties in breeding and foraging (Lu and Zheng, 2001).
Before the 1980s, rifles were available to local people. It is generally known that game animals, including Galliformes, were frequently killed during that period. In the mid 1990's, the Firearm Law of the People's Republic of China was issued, forbidding anybody to own and keep any kind of gun privately. As a result, pressure from hunting of wildlife has declined considerably. However, trapping, especially by people from outside Tibet, has not been entirely prohibited, causing a certain loss of Galliformes. Oak-cutting in nearby villages has led to the emergence of second scrub oak forests, not suitable to Galliformes. To encourage local people to use firewood in more effective ways (for example by promoting more efficient stoves), is one means of reducing the loss of oak forests.
However, overall, because of low population densities, poor communication and less developed economies, as well as protection by local religious and government policies, Galliformes in the region have been facing relatively fewer threats. But it should be kept in mind that developing local economies and improved communication will inevitably pose a threat to wildlife. Therefore, development plans for unexplored areas should be carefully made, because once loss of biodiversity, derived from a long-term evolutionary trend, reestablishment is almost impossible.
I suggest for government agencies to establish a nature reserve in the region. This will prevent large-scale landscape use in the future and also provide a foundation for enhancing public conservation awareness. To aid conservation, further studies on the biology and ecology of the Galliformes are needed.
I would like to thank Duojicipei and his family for accommodation in the area. I am grateful to Bingyuan Gu, Soulong Ciren and Cangjue Zhuoma for their assistance in the survey. The field survey was supported by the Tibetan Bureau of Science and Technology, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 39800016) and the Tibet Important Bird Area Survey Programme organized by BirdLife International.
1. | Sarah Schmid, Diego A Hartasánchez, Wan-Ting Huang, et al. Genomic Architecture of the Clownfish Hybrid Amphiprion leucokranos. Genome Biology and Evolution, 2025, 17(3) DOI:10.1093/gbe/evaf031 |
2. | Farooq Omar Al-Ajli, Giulio Formenti, Olivier Fedrigo, et al. Chromosome-level reference genome assembly of the gyrfalcon (Falco rusticolus) and population genomics offer insights into the falcon population in Mongolia. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15(1) DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-88216-9 |
3. | A. P. Kryukov, O. A. Goroshko. Breeding success of the interspecies hybrids: Reduced fertility in the hybridogeneous magpie population (<i>Pica pica</i> × <i>Pica serica</i>, Aves). Žurnal obŝej biologii, 2024, 85(4): 332. DOI:10.31857/S0044459624040054 |
4. | Dezhi Zhang, Huishang She, Shangyu Wang, et al. Phylogenetic Conflict Between Species Tree and Maternally Inherited Gene Trees in a Clade of Emberiza Buntings (Aves: Emberizidae). Systematic Biology, 2024, 73(2): 279. DOI:10.1093/sysbio/syad078 |
5. | Andrew N Black, Andrew J Mularo, Jong Yoon Jeon, et al. Discordance between taxonomy and population genomic data: An avian example relevant to the United States Endangered Species Act. PNAS Nexus, 2024, 3(8) DOI:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae298 |
6. | Sajid Mahmood, Mian Sayed Khan, Zaib Ullah, et al. The origin of genetic diversity of indigenous cockfighting chickens of Pakistan by analyzing the mtDNA. Heliyon, 2024, 10(6): e27755. DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27755 |
7. | Kira M Long, Angel G Rivera-Colón, Kevin F P Bennett, et al. Ongoing introgression of a secondary sexual plumage trait in a stable avian hybrid zone. Evolution, 2024, 78(9): 1539. DOI:10.1093/evolut/qpae076 |
8. | Jente Ottenburghs, Kati Moore, Jason Wolf. Digest: Asymmetrical introgression of belly coloration across a manakin hybrid zone in Panama. Evolution, 2024, 78(9): 1633. DOI:10.1093/evolut/qpae096 |
9. | Jente Ottenburghs, Johanna Honka, Marja E. Heikkinen, et al. Highly differentiated loci resolve phylogenetic relationships in the Bean Goose complex. BMC Ecology and Evolution, 2023, 23(1) DOI:10.1186/s12862-023-02103-3 |
10. | Philip Lavretsky, Jonathon E. Mohl, Pär Söderquist, et al. The meaning of wild: Genetic and adaptive consequences from large-scale releases of domestic mallards. Communications Biology, 2023, 6(1) DOI:10.1038/s42003-023-05170-w |
11. | Mark S Hibbins, Matthew W Hahn, M Turelli. Phylogenomic approaches to detecting and characterizing introgression. Genetics, 2022, 220(2) DOI:10.1093/genetics/iyab173 |
12. | James K Schull, Yatish Turakhia, James A Hemker, et al. Champagne: Automated Whole-Genome Phylogenomic Character Matrix Method Using Large Genomic Indels for Homoplasy-Free Inference. Genome Biology and Evolution, 2022, 14(3) DOI:10.1093/gbe/evac013 |
13. | Alexey P. Kryukov, Oleg A. Goroshko, Vladimir Y. Arkhipov, et al. Introgression at the emerging secondary contact zone of magpie Pica pica subspecies (Aves: Corvidae): integrating data on nuclear and mitochondrial markers, vocalizations, and field observations. Organisms Diversity & Evolution, 2022, 22(4): 1037. DOI:10.1007/s13127-022-00568-6 |
14. | Florentine Riquet, Aurélien Japaud, Flávia L. D. Nunes, et al. Complex spatial patterns of genetic differentiation in the Caribbean mustard hill coral Porites astreoides. Coral Reefs, 2022, 41(3): 813. DOI:10.1007/s00338-021-02157-z |
15. | Théo Tricou, Eric Tannier, Damien M de Vienne, et al. Ghost Lineages Highly Influence the Interpretation of Introgression Tests. Systematic Biology, 2022, 71(5): 1147. DOI:10.1093/sysbio/syac011 |
16. | Nicholas R. Minor, Paul J. Dougherty, Scott A. Taylor, et al. Estimating hybridization in the wild using citizen science data: A path forward. Evolution, 2022, 76(2): 362. DOI:10.1111/evo.14392 |
17. | V. A. Komarova, L. A. Lavrenchenko. Approaches to the Detection of Hybridization Events and Genetic Introgression upon Phylogenetic Incongruence. Biology Bulletin Reviews, 2022, 12(3): 240. DOI:10.1134/S2079086422030045 |
18. | Michael J. Andersen, Jenna M. McCullough, Ethan F. Gyllenhaal, et al. Complex histories of gene flow and a mitochondrial capture event in a nonsister pair of birds. Molecular Ecology, 2021, 30(9): 2087. DOI:10.1111/mec.15856 |
19. | Prateek Dey, Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, Indrani Sarkar, et al. Complete mitogenome of endemic plum-headed parakeet Psittacula cyanocephala – characterization and phylogenetic analysis. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16(4): e0241098. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0241098 |
20. | Jente Ottenburghs, Keyi Geng, Alexander Suh, et al. Genome Size Reduction and Transposon Activity Impact tRNA Gene Diversity While Ensuring Translational Stability in Birds. Genome Biology and Evolution, 2021, 13(4) DOI:10.1093/gbe/evab016 |
21. | Jente Ottenburghs. An evidence-based overview of hybridization in tinamous. Ornithology Research, 2021, 29(2): 113. DOI:10.1007/s43388-021-00049-y |
22. | Paulo Pulgarín-R, Martha Olivera-Angel, Luisa Ortíz, et al. DNA barcodes of birds from northern Colombia. Biodiversity Data Journal, 2021, 9 DOI:10.3897/BDJ.9.e64842 |
23. | Kritika M. Garg, Balaji Chattopadhyay. Gene Flow in Volant Vertebrates: Species Biology, Ecology and Climate Change. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science, 2021, 101(2): 165. DOI:10.1007/s41745-021-00239-z |
24. | Jente Ottenburghs. The genic view of hybridization in the Anthropocene. Evolutionary Applications, 2021, 14(10): 2342. DOI:10.1111/eva.13223 |
25. | Dezhi Zhang, Frank E Rheindt, Huishang She, et al. Most Genomic Loci Misrepresent the Phylogeny of an Avian Radiation Because of Ancient Gene Flow. Systematic Biology, 2021, 70(5): 961. DOI:10.1093/sysbio/syab024 |
26. | Ingrid Corasí Ortiz González, Ramón E. Rivera-Vicéns, Nikolaos V. Schizas. Description of four Millepora spp. transcriptomes and their potential to delimit the Caribbean fire coral species. Marine Genomics, 2021, 59: 100863. DOI:10.1016/j.margen.2021.100863 |
27. | Philip Lavretsky, Robert E. Wilson, Sandra L. Talbot, et al. Phylogenomics reveals ancient and contemporary gene flow contributing to the evolutionary history of sea ducks (Tribe Mergini). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2021, 161: 107164. DOI:10.1016/j.ympev.2021.107164 |
28. | Vicente de J. Castillo-Chora, Luz E. Zamudio-Beltrán, Carmen Pozo, et al. Phylogeography of Habia fuscicauda (Cardinalidae) indicates population isolation, genetic divergence and demographic changes during the Quaternary climate shifts in the Mesoamerican rainforest. Journal of Ornithology, 2021, 162(4): 961. DOI:10.1007/s10336-021-01904-x |
29. | Liviu G. Pârâu, Michael Wink. Common patterns in the molecular phylogeography of western palearctic birds: a comprehensive review. Journal of Ornithology, 2021, 162(4): 937. DOI:10.1007/s10336-021-01893-x |
30. | Mahendra Mariadassou, Marie Suez, Sanbadam Sathyakumar, et al. Unraveling the history of the genus Gallus through whole genome sequencing. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2021, 158: 107044. DOI:10.1016/j.ympev.2020.107044 |
31. | José Fernando Pacheco, Luís Fábio Silveira, Alexandre Aleixo, et al. Annotated checklist of the birds of Brazil by the Brazilian Ornithological Records Committee—second edition. Ornithology Research, 2021, 29(2): 94. DOI:10.1007/s43388-021-00058-x |
32. | Elisa C. Henderson, Alan Brelsford. Genomic differentiation across the speciation continuum in three hummingbird species pairs. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 2020, 20(1) DOI:10.1186/s12862-020-01674-9 |
33. | Kerensa McElroy, Andrew Black, Gaynor Dolman, et al. Robbery in progress: Historical museum collections bring to light a mitochondrial capture within a bird species widespread across southern Australia, the Copperback Quail‐thrush Cinclosoma clarum. Ecology and Evolution, 2020, 10(13): 6785. DOI:10.1002/ece3.6403 |
34. | Joseph A. Tobias, Jente Ottenburghs, Alex L. Pigot. Avian Diversity: Speciation, Macroevolution, and Ecological Function. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2020, 51(1): 533. DOI:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110218-025023 |
35. | Jente Ottenburghs. Ghost Introgression: Spooky Gene Flow in the Distant Past. BioEssays, 2020, 42(6) DOI:10.1002/bies.202000012 |
36. | Jente Ottenburghs. Digest: Avian genomes are permeable to introgression for a few million years*. Evolution, 2020, 74(5): 1010. DOI:10.1111/evo.13968 |
37. | Jente Ottenburghs, Johanna Honka, Gerard J. D. M. Müskens, et al. Recent introgression between Taiga Bean Goose and Tundra Bean Goose results in a largely homogeneous landscape of genetic differentiation. Heredity, 2020, 125(1-2): 73. DOI:10.1038/s41437-020-0322-z |
38. | Toni Gabaldón. Patterns and impacts of nonvertical evolution in eukaryotes: a paradigm shift. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2020, 1476(1): 78. DOI:10.1111/nyas.14471 |
39. | Raman Akinyanju Lawal, Simon H. Martin, Koen Vanmechelen, et al. The wild species genome ancestry of domestic chickens. BMC Biology, 2020, 18(1) DOI:10.1186/s12915-020-0738-1 |
40. | Kin Onn Chan, Carl R. Hutter, Perry L. Wood, et al. Larger, unfiltered datasets are more effective at resolving phylogenetic conflict: Introns, exons, and UCEs resolve ambiguities in Golden-backed frogs (Anura: Ranidae; genus Hylarana). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2020, 151: 106899. DOI:10.1016/j.ympev.2020.106899 |
41. | Annika Mae Lamb, Anders Gonçalves da Silva, Leo Joseph, et al. Pleistocene-dated biogeographic barriers drove divergence within the Australo-Papuan region in a sex-specific manner: an example in a widespread Australian songbird. Heredity, 2019, 123(5): 608. DOI:10.1038/s41437-019-0206-2 |
42. | Kritika M Garg, Katerina Sam, Balaji Chattopadhyay, et al. Gene Flow in the Müllerian Mimicry Ring of a Poisonous Papuan Songbird Clade (Pitohui; Aves). Genome Biology and Evolution, 2019, 11(8): 2332. DOI:10.1093/gbe/evz168 |
43. | Josefin Stiller, Guojie Zhang. Comparative Phylogenomics, a Stepping Stone for Bird Biodiversity Studies. Diversity, 2019, 11(7): 115. DOI:10.3390/d11070115 |
44. | Ashlee Shipham, Leo Joseph, Daniel J. Schmidt, et al. Dissection by genomic and plumage variation of a geographically complex hybrid zone between two Australian non-sister parrot species, Platycercus adscitus and Platycercus eximius. Heredity, 2019, 122(4): 402. DOI:10.1038/s41437-018-0127-5 |
45. | Devon A DeRaad, James M Maley, Whitney L E Tsai, et al. Phenotypic clines across an unstudied hybrid zone in Woodhouse’s Scrub-Jay (Aphelocoma woodhouseii). The Auk, 2019, 136(2) DOI:10.1093/auk/uky018 |
46. | Jente Ottenburghs. Digest: White‐eye birds provide possible answer to the paradox of the great speciator*. Evolution, 2019, 73(8): 1681. DOI:10.1111/evo.13814 |
47. | Abhimanyu Lele, Jente Ottenburghs. Digest: A single genetic origin and a role for bone development pathways in repeated losses of flight in steamer ducks*. Evolution, 2019, 73(9): 2030. DOI:10.1111/evo.13827 |
48. | Jente Ottenburghs. Multispecies hybridization in birds. Avian Research, 2019, 10(1) DOI:10.1186/s40657-019-0159-4 |
49. | Jente Ottenburghs. Exploring the hybrid speciation continuum in birds. Ecology and Evolution, 2018, 8(24): 13027. DOI:10.1002/ece3.4558 |
50. | J. Albert C. Uy, Darren E. Irwin, Michael S. Webster. Behavioral Isolation and Incipient Speciation in Birds. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2018, 49(1): 1. DOI:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110617-062646 |
51. | Edward L. Braun, Joel Cracraft, Peter Houde. Avian Genomics in Ecology and Evolution. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-16477-5_6 |
52. | Jente Ottenburghs, Philip Lavretsky, Jeffrey L. Peters, et al. Avian Genomics in Ecology and Evolution. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-16477-5_8 |
53. | Arild Husby, S. Eryn McFarlane, Anna Qvarnström. Avian Genomics in Ecology and Evolution. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-16477-5_9 |
54. | Jente Ottenburghs. Avian Genomics in Ecology and Evolution. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-16477-5_7 |
55. | Loren Cassin-Sackett, Andreanna J. Welch, Madhvi X. Venkatraman, et al. Avian Genomics in Ecology and Evolution. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-16477-5_10 |
56. | Herbert H. T. Prins, Iain J. Gordon. The Equids. Fascinating Life Sciences, DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-27144-1_1 |
57. | Leo Joseph. Bird Species. Fascinating Life Sciences, DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-91689-7_10 |
Habitat | Elevation (m) | Survey time (h) | Chinese Grouse | Snow Partridge | Tibetan Snow Cock | Pheasant Grouse | Tibetan Partridge | Blood Pheasant | Crimson-bellied Tragopan | Hybrid Eared-pheasant |
Farmland | 3700−3800 | 46.0 | (0.04) | |||||||
South-facing slopes | ||||||||||
Secondary oak shrubs | 3700−3900 | 39.6 | 0.05 (0.03) | 0.81 (0.15) | ||||||
Oak forest | 3800−4300 | 82.2 | 0.02 (0.02) | 0.09 (0.04) | 0.02 (0.01) | 3.21 (0.34) | ||||
Shrub-meadow above tree line | 4300−4500 | 19.5 | 0.92 | |||||||
Juniper forests | 4200−4700 | 62.0 | 0.70 (0.13) | 0.03 (0.03) | 1.00 (1.00) | 0.03 (0.02) | 1.69 (0.27) | |||
Shrub-meadows above tree line | 4600−4900 | 25.5 | (0.04) | (0.04) | 0.75 (0.24) | |||||
North-facing slopes | ||||||||||
Spruce forests | 3700−4300 | 16.6 | 0.12 (0.12) | 0.18 (0.18) | ||||||
Rhododendron | 4300−4800 | 8.5 | 0.12 | |||||||
Shrub-meadows above tree line | 4600−4900 | 7.0 | ||||||||