J. Dylan Maddox. 2017: Assigning hatchlings to eggs: Is relative mass assignment an accurate method?. Avian Research, 8(1): 17. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-017-0077-2
Citation: J. Dylan Maddox. 2017: Assigning hatchlings to eggs: Is relative mass assignment an accurate method?. Avian Research, 8(1): 17. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-017-0077-2

Assigning hatchlings to eggs: Is relative mass assignment an accurate method?

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    J. Dylan Maddox, dmaddox@feldmuseum.org

  • Received Date: 19 Feb 2017
  • Accepted Date: 26 Jun 2017
  • Available Online: 24 Apr 2022
  • Publish Date: 30 Jun 2017
  • Background 

    Accurately assigning hatchlings to the eggs from which they hatched is a prerequisite to understanding how the composition and environment of eggs affect the growth and survival of nestlings. Correctly assigning hatchlings to their eggs can be a challenging endeavor, however, because multiple eggs within the same clutch can hatch at essentially the same time. Egg and hatchling mass are highly correlated in most bird species, and thus assigning eggs to hatchlings using their relative mass (e.g., matching the heaviest hatchling to the heaviest candidate egg) could prove extremely useful.

    Methods 

    To assess its potential utility, I applied relative mass assignment (RMA) retrospectively to a dataset of 133 Common Grackle (Quiscalus quiscula) nests in which all egg-hatchling dyads were determined unequivocally.

    Results 

    I found that RMA correctly assigned approximately 90% of hatchlings to their eggs when 2-4 hatchlings were present between checks. The number of nests in which hatchlings could not be assigned to their egg, however, increased monotonically from 13 to 46 to 78% for nests containing 2, 3, and 4 hatchlings, respectively, due to the greater likelihood that the mass of hatchlings or their candidate eggs was identical.

    Conclusions 

    Although RMA correctly identified the vast majority of egg-hatchling dyads, researchers should use this method with caution, because it will always inflate positive egg-size effects and thus could potentially result in erroneously reporting significant effects.

  • In 2 April 2012 a birdwatcher, Mr. Hong Guo, found a strange white bird near a garbage dump in Wuqia County, (39°55′N, 75°15′E), at an elevation of 2100 m. This location is approximately 80 km west of Kaxgar. After experts checked the photographs, it was identified as an adult Egyptian Vulture (Neophron percnopterus), also known as the White Vulture (Fig. 1). This is the first time a Chinese bird-watcher photographed this vulture.

    Figure  1.  The Egyptian Vulture (Neophron percnopterus)(Photo by Hong Guo)

    The point of record, Wuqia County, is about 110–130 km distance from the border of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. The Egyptian Vulture is found in southwestern Europe, northern Africa, south and west Asia, as well as some countries neighboring China, i.e., India, Nepal, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan. This bird likes to live in groups and use old nests. This species is genetically relatively close to the Bearded Vulture or Lammergeier (Gypaetus barbatus).

    The Egyptian Vulture is a medium to large bird (length 56–64 cm); its entire body is white but its flight feathers are black, it has a small head with a narrow and long bill and a wedge-shaped tail (Fig. 2). They sometimes crack eggs by using a stone, a rare example in the case raptors of knowing how to use tools.

    Figure  2.  An Egyptian Vulture (Neophron percnopterus) with a raven in the west of Xinjiang (Photo by Hong Guo)

    Actually, this was not the first record in Xinjiang. About eleven years ago in the Ili River Region (43°37′N, 82°25′E), Jesper Hornskov reported a bird watching record of this species (Hornskov, unpublished; Ma, 2001). However, it was reported as an observation but no photograph is available of the event and therefore no proof of its occurrence at the time. Apparently, this is then the first record for China for this bird (not listed by Cheng, 1987, 2000; Ma, 1995; Yan et al., 1995; MacKinnon et al., 2000; Zheng, 2011), although de Schauensee (1984) noted that "[the species] possibly occurs in W Sinkiang in the Tien Shan region." Flint et al. (1984) listed the species in Kazakhstan and mapped it as occurring right up to the Xinjiang border at about 45°N. Mr. Hong Guo took about 40 clear photos of the event, providing strong evidence of a new record for Chinese birds. It is initially identified as the subspecies Neophron percnopterus percnopterus (Fig. 2).

    The program is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30970340, 31272291).

  • Ar A, Rahn H. Water in the avian egg overall budget of incubation. Am Zool. 1980;20:373-84.
    Blount JD, Surai PF, Nager RG, Houston DC, Møller AP, Trewby ML, Kennedy MW. Carotenoids and egg quality in the lesser black-backed gull Larus fuscus: a supplemental feeding study of maternal effects. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2002;269:29-36.
    Clark A, Wilson D. Avian breeding adaptations: hatching asynchrony, brood reduction, and nest failure. Q Rev Biol. 1981;56:253-77.
    Deeming DC, Birchard GF. Allometry of egg and hatchling mass in birds and reptiles: roles of developmental maturity, eggshell structure and phylogeny. J Zool. 2007;271:78-87.
    DuRant SE, Hepp GR, Moore IT, Hopkins BC, Hopkins WA. Slight differences in incubation temperature affect early growth and stress endocrinology of wood duck (Aix sponsa) ducklings. J Exp Biol. 2009;213:45-51.
    DuRant SE, Hopkins WA, Wilson AF, Hepp GR. Incubation temperature affects the metabolic cost of thermoregulation in a young precocial bird. Funct Ecol. 2011;26:416-22.
    Groothuis TGG, Muller W, Von Engelhardt N, Carere C, Eising C. Maternal hormones as a tool to adjust offspring phenotype in avian species. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005;29:329-52.
    Howe HF. Egg size, hatching asynchrony, sex, and brood reduction in the common grackle. Ecology. 1976;57:1195-207.
    Krist M. Egg size and offspring quality: a meta-analysis in birds. Biol Rev. 2011;86:692-716.
    Maddox JD, Weatherhead PJ. Egg size variation in birds with asynchronous hatching: is bigger really better? Am Nat. 2008;171:358-65.
    Maddox JD, Weatherhead PJ. Seasonal sex allocation by Common Grackles? Revisiting a foundational study. Ecology. 2009;90:3190-6.
    Maddox JD, Weatherhead PJ. Discrepancy between factors affecting nestling growth and survival and maternal success in Common Grackles. J Field Ornithol. 2012;83:17-25.
    Magrath RD. Hatching asynchrony in altricial birds. Biol Rev. 1990;65:587-622.
    Pike T, Petrie M. Potential mechanisms of avian sex manipulation. Biol Rev. 2003;78:553-74.
    Royle NJ, Surai PF, Hartley IR. Maternally derived androgens and antioxidants in bird eggs: complementary but opposing effects? Behav Ecol. 2001;12:381-5.
    Williams TD. Intraspecific variation in egg size and egg composition in birds: effects on offspring fitness. Biol Rev. 1994;68:35-59.
  • Related Articles

Catalog

    Figures(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (7851) PDF downloads (40) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return