Andrew J. Hamilton, Chloé Conort, Aurore Bueno, Christopher G. Murray, James R. Grove. 2017: Waterbird use of farm dams in south-eastern Australia: abundance and influence of biophysical and landscape characteristics. Avian Research, 8(1): 2. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-016-0058-x
Citation: Andrew J. Hamilton, Chloé Conort, Aurore Bueno, Christopher G. Murray, James R. Grove. 2017: Waterbird use of farm dams in south-eastern Australia: abundance and influence of biophysical and landscape characteristics. Avian Research, 8(1): 2. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-016-0058-x

Waterbird use of farm dams in south-eastern Australia: abundance and influence of biophysical and landscape characteristics

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Andrew J. Hamilton, andrewjh@unimelb.edu.au

  • Received Date: 27 Sep 2016
  • Accepted Date: 05 Dec 2016
  • Available Online: 24 Apr 2022
  • Publish Date: 18 Jan 2017
  • Background 

    While agriculture has taken much environmental water in Australia's Murray-Darling Basin, agricultural expansion has resulted in a vast number of farm dams, almost three-quarters of a million in the Murray-Darling Basin alone.

    Methods 

    Over a summer we studied (1) waterbird abundance and species richness and (2) the influence of biophysical and landscape characteristics across 49 farm dams at a large mixed-enterprise farm in northern Victoria on the southern reach of the Murray-Darling Basin.

    Results 

    On average, dams were found to host 27.1 ± 71.1 individuals/ha and 1.8 ± 2.9 species per pond. Such densities are comparable to those on natural wetlands. Dam surface area and perimeter and amount of vegetation were positively and strongly correlated with the Rallidae density (birds/ha), but no other parameters were strongly correlated with any other functional group. The landscape in which the dams were embedded had a highly significant effect (p < 0.001) on the number of birds found on a dam.

    Conclusions 

    Our research needs to be complemented with further studies in other parts of the Basin and on other taxa, but given at our site they supported similar densities of individuals and species to natural wetlands, and given the fact that there are 710, 539 farm dams in the Murray-Darling Basin, which hosts much of Australia's waterbird fauna, it is reasonable to suggest that farm dams are overlooked, and possibly very important, avian biodiversity hotspots. It also highlights the importance of a landscape setting, in which dams are situated, on the number of birds using the dams.

  • Breeding, migration, and moulting are considered the three-main energy-demanding events in the yearly cycle of birds (Newton 2008) and usually studied separately due to their isolated occurrence (Newton 2009). The importance of the moult in the life cycle of birds of prey for advancing our understanding of the ecology of each species has been recently highlighted by Zuberogoitia et al. (2018). In several migrating species moulting leads to age-dependent migration strategies (Cristol et al. 1999; Zenzal and Moore 2016) and these differences are especially pronounced among long-distance migrants. Among passerines, first-year birds migrate earlier than adults. The opposite occurs in species in which adults suspend or postpone moult until they reach their wintering grounds (Schifferli 1965; Payevski 1994; Woodrey and Chandler 1997; Woodrey and Moore 1997; Jakubas and Wojczulanis-Jakubas 2010). Long distance migrant raptors typically avoid moulting during migration (Berthold 1975; Newton 1979) such as in the case of Osprey (Pandion haliaaetus; Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). In small raptors the time required to grow a new feather is 2-3 weeks while it is much longer in large raptors such as vulture species (Zuberogoitia et al. 2018). In the case of damaged feathers, raptors can replace them much faster than in the usual time of moulting (Ellis et al. 2016). However, there are species that do not stop moulting during long-distance movements (Kjellén 1992). For example, it has been found that Palearctic Circus sp. moult during migration and eventually slow the moulting process (Arroyo and King 1996). Moreover, we can find the "suspended moult" strategy which is defined as a moult interrupted temporarily and subsequently resumed (Baker 2016). This strategy frequently involves individuals in late breeding attempts having to interrupt their normal moult cycle in order to migrate.

    In Western Marsh Harriers (WMHs), females started moulting during incubation (May-June) while males start up to 6 weeks later (Forsman 1999). During chicks rearing period WMH may suspend moult for better hunting efficiency while they end moulting in late October-early November (Forsman 1999). During spring migration Gorney and Yom (2001) showed that adult WMHs perform their journey with non-active moult in their flight feathers.

    Unfortunately, moulting patterns in relation to migration strategies are poorly investigated in raptor species despite it is well known that long-distance migrant Accipitriformes need a large amount of energy to overcome barriers during migration where they must use flapping powered flight (Agostini et al. 2015). The aim of this work is to confirm and to describe the active moult of WMH's flight feathers during the spring migration across the Strait of Messina.

    From August 13th to September 30th 2016 we collected data on moulting Western Marsh Harriers migrating along the Mid-Mediterranean Flyway (Fig. 1). Fieldwork was carried out on the continental side of the Strait of Messina, a hotspot for soaring birds (Panuccio et al. 2005; Agostini et al. 2017; Pastorino et al. 2017). We used two watch points both located on the Aspromonte Plains, a flat highland a few kilometers inland of the Strait of Messina, on the western side of the Apennines ridge. The highland lies between 1000 and 1200 m a.s.l. with a landscape altered by human agricultural activity. One of the watch points was located in the middle of the highland while the other one was located close the mountain slopes. Observations were carried out daily from sunrise to sunset.

    Figure  1.  Geographical context of the study area, the Strait of Messina (SM). The asterisk indicates the Aspromonte plain

    We used high-quality photos taken in the field from which moult patterns can be inferred (Snyder et al. 1987; Zuberogoitia et al. 2016; Vieira et al. 2017). Digital cameras (i.e. Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ72, FZ300) were equipped with lens with 8-60 × magnification. Photography data collection was supported by visual observations that were made using binoculars (i.e. Leica 10 × 42) and scopes (i.e. Swarowski 20-60 ×) by at least two experienced birders operating simultaneously. Visual observations were used only to detect if birds were moulting or not. Pictures and data were compared daily with those from the other watch points to delete possible double-counting of the same individuals according to the time and location of the birds passage as well as the individual moult features and sex. Only birds observed or photographed at closer range (< 100 m) were considered in the analysis, providing a random sample of the whole number of WMHs detected. We determined: (1) if harriers were moulting or not; (2) for a subsample of individuals, we were able to describe the moulting stage according to Ginn and Melville (1983). In this last subset of data, we recorded the number of primaries that the bird was moulting, if any. Therefore, we assigned a value from 1 to 10 according to the primary feathers moulting pattern of the species, being 1 = P1, 2 = P2 and so on (Baker 2016).

    We used two different analyses. A Binary Logistic Regression Analysis (hereafter BLRA) (logit link function) (Boyce et al. 2002; Keating and Cherry 2004; Rushton et al. 2004) was used to test the factors influencing numbers of moulting individuals. For this we compared moulting and non-moulting birds (using both, data from visual observations and from pictures inspection), that in the BLRA was our dependent binary variable (1/0). The covariates were:

    1. The Julian date calculated as the number of the day from the beginning of the year (January 1st being day number 1).

    2. The squared Julian date was used as covariate as well to account for non-linear effects of the Julian date on bird migration (Knudsen et al. 2007; Lindén 2011; Lindén and Mäntyniemi 2011; Panuccio et al. 2016).

    3. Sex of the bird (male, female).

    4. Age (2nd CY, adult).

    5. Watch point.

    We tested the fitness of the model by means of the area under the curve of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) plot (Pearce and Ferrier 2000; Boyce et al. 2002; Fawcett 2006). This area provides a measure of discrimination ability, varying from 0.5 for a model with a discrimination ability no better than random, to 1.0 for a model with perfect discriminatory ability.

    To verify the variation of moulting stage among the photographed individuals, we used a Linear Model (LM) using the number of moulting primaries as dependent variable (from 1 to 10). As covariates we used the same of the BLRA with the exclusion of the watchpoint. We tested the fitness of the model checking the R2 value.

    For both, LM and BLRA, we made a stepwise model selection comparing the different models by the AICc value and choosing the ones with the lowest value. All statistical analyses were made with R open source software (R Development Core Team 2015).

    We observed a total of 3522 Western Marsh Harriers between the 13th August to 30th September. Among those, the individuals that were aged as adult birds were 1125 while juveniles were 413. From adult birds, 802 were positively identified as males and 323 as females, of which 19 were 2nd CY birds. Other 673 individuals were recorded under the category female/juvenile type. The remaining 1311 observed WMHs were undetermined. We took close pictures that allowed us to identify clear signs of moult from 107 individuals, while other 114 harriers did not show moult signs. From all these WMHs we obtained active moult schemes extracted from photos of 35 WMHs, 21 males and 14 females respectively. Another seven WMHs that recently suspended the moult of their primaries were confirmed but not included in the analyses because they weren't active moulting birds. We did not record any individuals with old feathers missing or with new pin feathers, neither individuals with new feathers at one-third of its whole length. The timing of the primary feathers moult varies slightly between males and females (Fig. 2). Females showed a more advanced moult stage on average than males, with 100% of the females with the inner 3rd primary already moulted unlike the 79% of the males. Similarly, different proportions between sexes have been recorded for the 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th primaries. However, the three outermost primaries, the 8th, the 9th and the 10th, remained unmoulted in both sexes (Fig. 3).

    Figure  2.  Proportions of moulting WMH during autumn migration at the Strait of Messina. Moulting (Yes = light grey) and non-moulting (No = dark grey) birds across the season (11th August-30th September). (a) Males, (b) Females
    Figure  3.  Proportion of moulted primaries for male and female WMHs recorded in the present study (SS = secondary feathers)

    The results of both, the BLRA and the LM (Table 1), indicate that the Julian date is the only relevant variable explaining the passage of moulting harriers in the study area, with higher numbers observed early in the season and with a more advanced moult later in the season (Table 1). Females were observed with more moulted primaries than males (Fig. 4). Moreover, 2nd CY harriers have a more advanced moult comparing to adults (Table 1).

    Table  1.  Model selection for the BLRA and for the LM investigating factors influencing moult of migrating Western Marsh Harriers
    Model AICc ΔAICcAUC/R2
    BLRA Julian date (β = - 0.04 ± 0.01, p < 0.01) 288.6 0 0.61
    Julian date, Julian date squared, Sex, Age, Watchpoint293.650.64
    LM Julian date (β = 0.1 ± 0.03, p < 0.05), Sex (Males, β = - 1 ± 0.4, p < 0.05), Age (Adults, β = - 1.7 ± 0.8, p < 0.05) 22.39 0 0.48
    Julian date, Julian date squared, Sex, Age24.121.730.49
    Parameters estimates ± standard errors are shown together with p values for the best models. The best models are shown in italics, below the full models are reported
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure  4.  Moult of male (a) and female (b) Western Marsh Harriers in relation to Julian date

    Our results suggest that adult WMHs start their autumn migration once the last primary to be moulted (maximum until the P7) was already expelled, and the previous primaries are already growing. Growing stages of those feathers could be visible during the lapse of migration that it takes for feathers to grow until their complete development. Therefore, during post-breeding migration only growing new flight feathers and moulted new ones were recorded, but no lacking feathers. We detected the presence of primary feathers unmoulted, already moulted, and growing at medium/late moulting stages. Not a single individual showed the lack of a primary or an immediate growing stage such as 1 or 2 (Ginn and Melville 1983). This indicates that replacing the next old feathers in the sequence is unlikely to occur during migration but in the winter quarters.

    The lack of feathers might imply a less efficient flight with a disproportional increase of the energy required for flapping (Pennycuick 2008). Therefore, it is possible that adult WMHs which belong to the same sex group with a higher number of primary feathers involved in their moult should come from breeding grounds farther away than individuals showing a less extended ongoing moult. Moreover, our data suggests that there is a relationship between the extension and timing of the suspended moult and the timing of the migration itself with a difference between males and females. We found adult females showed an averaged more extended moult than the adult males and a later timing of migration as well (Agostini and Panuccio 2010; Agostini et al. 2017). This confirms that adult females start moulting in the breeding season before the males. However, they suspend that moult later on average as well (Cramp and Simmons 1980; Kjellén 1992).

    If we considered "active moult" as the lapse of time during which a bird replaces feathers rather than the time spent by a bird on feathers growth, we might consider that active moult of WMHs ends at the breeding ground immediately after shedding the last primary to be replaced and just before starting the post-breeding migration. So, during migration, only growing feathers take place, being the extension of the suspended moult already defined at the breeding ground just before leaving. This strategy might be evolved to minimize the effect of moulting during migration. Such movements are energetically demanding and harriers are known to be raptors that largely use powered-flapping flight over long distances (Spaar and Bruderer 1997; Panuccio et al. 2013, 2016; Agostini et al. 2015, 2017).

    JR made the study design, collected data on moulting, prepared the dataset and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. MP coordinated the fieldwork, made the analysis and wrote the paper. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    We thank Giacomo Dell'Omo and Ornis italica for his support during the fieldwork. We are grateful to all the people who collected data at the Strait of Messina in autumn 2016 and in particular: Alberto Pastorino, Michele Cento, Gianpasquale Chiatante, Nicolantonio Agostini, Martina Zambon, Stiven Kocijančič, Giuseppe Cicero. We would also like to acknowledge Kylynn Clare for her contributions to the editing of this paper. We wish to thank MEDRAPTORS (www.raptormigration.org), a network of ornithologists involved in the research and the protection of migrating birds of prey through specific projects and observation camps.

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    The datasets used in the present study are available from the corresponding author on request.

    Not applicable.

    This study did not imply manipulation of birds.

  • APHA (American Public Health Association), AWWA (American Water Works Association), WEF (Water Environment Federation). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. Washington DC: American Public Health Association. 2005; 10-167.
    Arthur AD, Reid JRW, Kingsford RT, McGinness HM, Ward KA, Harper MJ. Breeding flow thresholds of colonial breeding waterbirds in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Wetlands. 2012;32:257-65.
    Blaker D. An outbreak of botulinus poisoning among waterbirds. Ostrich. 1967;38:144-7.
    Brainwood M, Burgin S. An exploration of the relationships between macroinvertebrate community composition and physical and chemical habitat characteristics in farm dams. Environ Monit Assess. 2006;119:459-80.
    Brainwood M, Burgin S. Hotspots of biodiversity or homogeneous landscapes? Farm dams as biodiversity reserves in Australia. Biodiv Conserv. 2009;18:3043-52.
    Brandis KJ, Kingsford RT, Ren S, Ramp D. Crisis water management and ibis breeding at Narran Lakes in arid Australia. Environ Manag. 2011;48:489-98.
    Buse A. The likelihood ratio, Wald, and Lagrange multiplier tests: an expository note. Amer Statist. 1982;36:153-7.
    CSIRO. Water availability in the Murray-Darling Basin. A report to the Australian Government from the CSIRO Murray-Darling Basin Sustainable Yields Project. CSIRO, Australia. 2008.
    Geddes MC. Understanding zooplankton communities in farm dams: The importance of predation. In: De Decker P, Williams WD, editors. Limnology in Australia. Dordrecht: Dr. W. Junk Publishers; 1986. p. 387-401.
    Goodman SN. P values, hypothesis tests, and likelihood: implications for epidemiology of a neglected historical debate. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137:485-96.
    Goodman SN. Toward evidence-based medical statistics: the P-value fallacy. Ann Int Med. 1999;130:995-1004.
    Hamilton AJ, Taylor IR. Seasonal patterns in abundance of waterfowl (Anatidae) at a waste-stabilisation pond. Victoria. Corella. 2004;28:38-40.
    Hamilton AJ, Taylor IR. Distribution of foraging waterbirds throughout the Lake Borrie ponds at the Western Treatment Plant, Victoria (Australia). Vict Nat. 2005;122:68-78.
    Hamilton AJ, Taylor IR. Notes on diving behaviour of hardhead Aythya australis in a sewage pond. Vict Nat. 2006;123:230-2.
    Hamilton AJ, Taylor IR, Hepworth G. Activity budgets of waterfowl (Anatidae) on a waste stabilisation pond. Emu. 2002;102:171-9.
    Hamilton AJ, Taylor IR, Rogers PM. Seasonal and diurnal patterns in abundance of waterbirds at a waste-stabilisation pond in Victoria. Corella. 2004;28:43-54.
    Hamilton AJ, Robinson W, Taylor IR, Wilson BP. The ecology of sewage treatment gradients in relation to their use by waterbirds. Hydrobiologia. 2005;534:91-108.
    Hazell D, Cunnningham R, Lindenmayer D, Mackey B, Osborne W. Use of farm dams as frog habitat in an Australian agricultural landscape: factors affecting species richness and distribution. Biol Conserv. 2001;102:155-69.
    Hochberg Y, Tamhane AC. Multiple comparison procedures. New York: Wiley; 1987.
    Jordan PW, Wiesenfeld CR, Hill PI, Morden RA, Chiew FHS. An assessment of the future impact of farm dams on runoff in the Murray-Darling Basin. In: Lambert M, Daniell TM, Leonard M, editors. Proceedings of water down under 2008. Modbury: Engineers Australia; 2008. p. 1618-29.
    Kingsford RT. Maned ducks and farm dams: a success story. Emu. 1992;92:163-9.
    Kingsford RT. Review: ecological impacts of dams, water diversions and river management on floodplain wetlands in Australia. Austral Ecol. 2000;25:109-27.
    Kingsford RT, Johnson W. Impact of water diversions on colonially nesting waterbirds in the Macquarie Marshes in arid Australia. Colon Waterbirds. 1998;21:159-70.
    Kingsford RT, Norman FI. Australian waterbirds—products of the continent's ecology. Emu. 2002;102: 47-69.
    Kingsford RT, Thomas RF. Destruction of wetlands and waterbird populations by dams and irrigation on the Murrumbidgee River in arid Australia. Environ Manage. 2004;34:383-96.
    Kingsford RT, Porter JL. Waterbirds and wetlands across Eastern Australia. Technical report prepared for the Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra, Australia; 2006.
    Kingsford RT, Jenkins KM, Porter JL. Imposed hydrological stability on lakes in arid Australia and effect on waterbirds. Ecology. 2004;85:2478-92.
    Kingsford RT, Porter JL, Halse SA. National Waterbird Assessment. Canberra: National Water Commission; 2012.
    Lake PS, Thomson JR, Lada H, Nally RM, Reid D, Stanaway J, Taylor AC. Diversity and distribution of macroinvertebrates in lentic habitats in massively altered landscapes in south-eastern Australia. Divers Distrib. 2010;16:713-24.
    Leslie DJ. Effect of river management on colonially-nesting waterbirds in the Barmah-Millewa forest, South-Eastern Australia. River Res Appl. 2001;17:21-36.
    Lowe L, Nathan R, Morden R. Assessing the impact of farm dams on streamflows, Part Ⅱ: regional characterisation. Aust J Water Res. 2005;9:13-26.
    Marchant S, Higgins PJ. Handbook of Australian, New Zealand & Antarctic Birds. Ratites to Ducks, vol. 1. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 1990.
    MDBA (Murray-Darling Basin Authority). Guide to the proposed Basin Plan: Technical background. Canberra: Murray-Darling Basin Authority; 2010.
    MDBC (Murray-Darling Basin Commission). Shared water resources: mapping the growth, location, surface area and age of man made water bodies, including farm dams, in the Murray-Darling Basin. Canberra: Australian Capital Territory; 2008.
    Merendino MT, Ankney CD. Habitat use by mallards and American black ducks breeding in central Ontario. Condor. 1994;96:411-21.
    Murray CG, Hamilton AJ. Perspectives on wastewater treatment wetlands and waterbird conservation. J Appl Ecol. 2010;47:976-85.
    Murray CG, Loyn RH, Kasel S, Hepworth G, Stamation K, Hamilton AJ. What can a database compiled over 22 years tell us about the use of different types of wetlands by waterfowl in south-eastern Australian summers? Emu. 2012;112:209-17.
    Murray CG, Kasel S, Loyn RH, Hepworth G, Hamilton AJ. Waterbird use of artificial wetlands in an Australian urban landscape. Hydrobiologia. 2013;76:131-46.
    Murray CG, Kasel S, Szantyr E, Barratt R, Hamilton AJ. Waterbird use of different treatment stages in waste-stabilisation pond systems. Emu. 2014;114:30-40.
    Nathan R, Jorden P, Morden R. Assessing the impact of farm dams on streamflows, Part Ⅰ: development of simulation tools. Aust J Water Res. 2005;9:1-12.
    Patterson HD, Thompson R. Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika. 1971;58:545-54.
    Patton DR. A diversity index for quantifying habitat "edge". Wildlife Soc Bull. 1975;3:171-3.
    Powell GVN. Habitat use by wading birds in a subtropical estuary: implications of hydrography. Auk. 1987;104:740-9.
    Ren S, Kingsford RT. Statistically integrated flow and flood modelling compared to hydrologically integrated quantity and quality model for annual flows in the regulated Macquarie River in arid Australia. Environ Manag. 2011;48:177-88.
    Rocke TE, Samuel MD. Water and sediment characteristics associated with avian botulism outbreaks in wetlands. J Wildl Manag. 1999;63:1249-60.
    Rocke TE, Euliss NH Jr, Samuel MD. Environmental characteristics associated with the occurrence of avian botulism in wetlands of a northern California refuge. J Wildl Manag. 1999;63:358-68.
    Schreider SY, Jakeman AJ, Letcher RA, Nathan RJ, Neal BP, Beavis SG. Detecting changes in streamflow response to changes in non-climatic catchment conditions: farm dam development in the Murray Darling Basin, Australia. J Hydrol. 2002;262:84-98.
    SKM (Sinclair Knight Merz). Background report: Farm dam interception in the Campaspe Basin under climate change. A working paper for the Draft Northern Region Sustainable Water Strategy. Malvern, Australia: Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd.; 2008.
    Ury HK. A comparison of four procedures for multiple comparisons among means (pairwise contrasts) for arbitrary sample sizes. Technometrics. 1976;18:89-97.
    Williams B. Water bird numbers take off as wetlands fill Lake Eyre and Murray-Darling river basin after floods. The Courier Mail. 2011. .
  • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. Nicolantonio Agostini, Gianpasquale Chiatante, Giacomo Dell’Omo, et al. Differential autumn migration between sex and age groups in the Western marsh harrier: a longitudinal pattern analysis. Ethology Ecology & Evolution, 2021, 33(1): 73. DOI:10.1080/03949370.2020.1820581
    2. Jesús Nadal, Carolina Ponz, Antoni Margalida. The end of primary moult as an indicator of global warming effects in the Red-legged Partridge Alectoris rufa, a medium sized, sedentary species. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 122: 107287. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107287
    3. Oluwadunsin E. Adekola, David G. Allan, Zephne Bernitz, et al. Extent and symmetry of tail moult in Amur Falcons. Journal of Ornithology, 2021. DOI:10.1007/s10336-021-01874-0

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Figures(1)  /  Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (550) PDF downloads (8) Cited by(3)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return