Ilya A. Volodin, Elena V. Volodina, Anna V. Klenova, Vera A. Matrosova, Ilya A. Volodin, Elena V. Volodina, Anna V. Klenova, Vera A. Matrosova. 2015: Gender identification using acoustic analysis in birds without external sexual dimorphism. Avian Research, 6(1): 20. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-015-0033-y
Citation: Ilya A. Volodin, Elena V. Volodina, Anna V. Klenova, Vera A. Matrosova, Ilya A. Volodin, Elena V. Volodina, Anna V. Klenova, Vera A. Matrosova. 2015: Gender identification using acoustic analysis in birds without external sexual dimorphism. Avian Research, 6(1): 20. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-015-0033-y

Gender identification using acoustic analysis in birds without external sexual dimorphism

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Ilya A. Volodin, volodinsvoc@gmail.com

    Ilya A. Volodin, volodinsvoc@gmail.com

  • Received Date: 21 Oct 2014
  • Accepted Date: 02 Nov 2015
  • Available Online: 24 Apr 2022
  • Published Date: 12 Nov 2015
  • Zoo and wildlife management faces a problem with bird sexing,as many bird taxa have indiscernible gender differences in size and coloration. Problematic groups are geese,cranes,rails,raptors,owls,parrots,doves,auks,shearwaters and some passerines. Commonly accepted invasive sexing techniques based on genetics,laparoscopy,morphometric and on cloacal inspection,are all needed in bird capturing and handling. Capturing and subsequent manipulations may be inapplicable for free-ranging birds,whereas distant voice-based sexing is relevant for many species. This review evaluates the potential for noninvasive sexing by separate calls or duet calls,for adult birds of 69 species from 16 orders and for chicks of 11 species from 7 orders. For adult birds of 25 species,a single call per individual was sufficient for 100 % reliable sexing by ear or using spectrographic analysis. For chicks,the potential for voice-based sexing seems to be very limited. For birds calling rarely or unpredictably,we propose a simple way of provoking vocalization using playbacks of species-specific calls that are available from sound libraries. We conclude that sexing by voice may represent a feasible alternative to the classical sexing techniques,both in the wild and in captivity.

  • loading
  • Archibald GW. The unison call of cranes as a useful taxonomic tool. 1976. PhD thesis. Cornell University, Ithaca, p 167.
    Aubin T, Mathevon N, Staszewski V, Boulinier T. Acoustic communication in the Kittiwake Rissa tridactyla: potential cues for sexual and individual signatures in long calls. Polar Biol. 2007;30:1027-33.
    Balkiz O, Dano S, Barbraund C, Tekin S, Özesmi U, Dündar M, Béchet A. Sexing greater flamingo chicks from feather bulb DNA. Waterbirds. 2007;30:450-3.
    Ballintijn MR, ten Cate C. Sex differences in the vocalizations and syrinx of the collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto). Auk. 1997;114:22-39.
    Baptista LF, Gaunt SLL. Bioacoustics as a tool in conservation studies. In: Clemmons JR, Buchholtz R, editors. Behavioral approaches to conservation in the wild. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997. p. 212-42.
    Barbraud C, Mariani A, Jouventin P. Variation in call properties of the snow petrel, Pagodroma nivea, in relation to sex and body size. Aust J Zool. 2000;48:421-30.
    Bazzano G, Lèche A, Martella MB, Navarro JL. Efficiency of the cloacal sexing technique in greater rhea chicks (Rhea americana). Brit Poult Sci. 2012;53(3):394-6.
    Beja-Pereira A, Oliveira R, Alves PC, Schwartz MK, Luikart G. Advancing ecological understandings through technological transformations in noninvasive genetics. Mol Ecol Res. 2009;9:1279-301.
    Berkunsky I, Mahler B, Reboreda JC. Sexual dimorphism and determination of sex by morphometrics in blue-fronted amazons (Amazona aestiva). Emu. 2009;109:192-7.
    Boersma PD, Davies EM. Sexing monomorphic birds by vent measurements. Auk. 1987;104:779-83.
    Bourgeois K, Cure C, Legrand J, Gomez-Diaz E, Vidal E, Aubin T, Mathevon N. Morphological versus acoustic analysis: what is the most efficient method for sexing yelkouan shearwaters Puffinus yelkouan? J Ornithol. 2007;148: 261-9.
    Boyd JH. Taxonomy in flux: version 2.52c. 2013. .
    Bragina EV, Beme IR. The sexual and individual differences in the vocal repertoire of adult Siberian cranes (Grus leucogeranus, Gruidae). Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. 2007;86:1468-81.
    Bragina EV, Beme IR. Siberian crane duet as an individual signature of a pair: comparison of visual and statistical classification techniques. Acta Ethol. 2010;13:39-48.
    Bragina EV, Beme IR. Sexual and individual features in the long-range and short-range calls of the white-naped crane. Condor. 2013;115:501-7.
    Bretagnolle V. Behavioural affinities of the blue petrel Halobaena caerulea. Ibis. 1990;132:102-23.
    Bretagnolle V, Genevois F. Geographic variation in the call of the blue petrel: effects of sex and geographical scale. Condor. 1997;99:985-9.
    Bretagnolle V, Lequette B. Structural variation in the call of the Cory's shearwater (Calonectris diomedea, Aves, Procellariidae). Ethology. 1990;85:313-23.
    Bretagnolle V, Thibault JC. Method for sexing fledglings in Cory's shearwaters and comments on sex-ratio variation. Auk. 1995;112:785-90.
    Bretagnolle V, Zotier R, Jouventin P. Comparative population biology of four prions (genus Pachyptila) from the Indian Ocean and consequences for their taxonomic status. Auk. 1990;107:305-16.
    Brooke ML. Sexual differences in the voice and individual recognition in the Manx shearwater (Puffinus puffinus). Anim Behav. 1978;26:622-9.
    Brooke ML. Sexual dimorphism in the voice of the greater shearwater. Wilson Bull. 1988;100:319-23.
    Brown AW, Brown LM, Stevick PT. Sexing mute swans Cygnus olor by discriminant analysis. Ring Migrat. 2003;21:174-80.
    Buchanan OM. Homosexual behavior in wild orange-fronted parakeets. Condor. 1966;68:399-400.
    Calabuig CP, Greenb AJ, Ferrera M, Muriela R, Moreirac H. Sexual size dimorphism and sex determination by morphometric measurements in the coscoroba swan. Stud Neotrop Fauna E. 2011;46:177-84.
    Carlson G, Trost CH. Sex determination of the whooping crane by analysis of vocalizations. Condor. 1992;94:532-6.
    Cavanagh PM, Ritchison G. Variation in the bounce and whinny songs of the Eastern screech-owl. Wilson Bull. 1987;99:620-7.
    Clapperton BK. Sexual differences in pukeko calls. Notornis. 1983;30:69-70.
    Conover MR. Parental care by male-female and female-female pairs of ringbilled gulls. Colon Waterbird. 1989;12:148-52.
    Conover MR, Hunt GL. Experimental evidence that female-female pairs in gull result from a shortage of breeding males. Condor. 1984;86:472-6.
    Copestake PG, Croxall JP, Prince PA. Use of cloacal sexing techniques in mark-recapture estimates of breeding population size in Wilson's storm petrel Oceanites oceanites in South Georgia. Polar Biol. 1988;8:271-9.
    Cosens SE. Development of vocalizations in the American coot. Can J Zool. 1981;59:1921-8.
    Craig JL, McArdle BH, Wetin PD. Sex determination of the pukeko or swamphen. Notornis. 1980;27:287-91.
    Cure C, Aubin T, Mathevon N. Acoustic convergence and divergence in two sympatric burrowing nocturnal seabirds. Biol J Linn Soc. 2009;96:115-34.
    Cure C, Aubin T, Mathevon N. Intra-sex vocal interactions in two hybridizing seabird species (Puffinus sp.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2010;64:1823-37.
    Cure C, Aubin T, Mathevon N. Sex discrimination and mate recognition by voice in the yelkouan shearwater Puffinus yelkouan. Bioacoustics. 2011;20:235-50.
    Delport W, Kemp AC, Ferguson WH. Vocal identification of individual African wood owls Strix woodfordii: a technique to monitor long-term adult turnover and residency. Ibis. 2002;144:30-9.
    Digby A, Bell BD, Teal PD. Vocal cooperation between the sexes in little spotted kiwi Apteryx owenii. Ibis. 2013;155:229-45.
    Eda-Fujiwara H, Yamamoto A, Sugita H, Takahashi Y, Kojima Y, Sakashita R, Ogawa H, Miyamoto T, Kimura T. Sexual dimorphism of acoustic signals in the oriental white stork: non-invasive identification of sex in birds. Zool Sci. 2004;8:817-21.
    Elie JE, Mathevon N, Vignal C. Same-sex pair-bonds are equivalent to male-female bonds in a life-long socially monogamous songbird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2011;65:2197-208.
    Fabricius E. Homosexualitet hos gragashanar Anser anser. Var Fagelwärld. 1981;40:427-46.
    Farquahar C. Individual and intersexual variation in alarm calls of the white-tailed hawk. Condor. 1993;95:234-9.
    Genevois F, Bretagnolle V. Sexual dimorphism of voice and morphology in the thin-billed prion (Pachyptila bekheri). Notornis. 1995;42:1-10.
    Genovart M, McMinn M, Bowler D. A discriminant function for predicting sex in the Balearic shearwater. Waterbirds. 2003;26:72-6.
    Gill FB, Stokes FJ, Stokes CC. Observations on the horned screamer. Wilson Bull. 1974;86:43-50.
    Goller F, Riede T. Integrative physiology of fundamental frequency control in birds. J Physiol Paris. 2013;107:230-42.
    Goncharova MV, Klenova AV, Bragina EV. Development of cues to individuality and sex in calls of three crane species: when is it good to be recognizable? J Ethol. 2015;33:165-75.
    Grava T, Mathevon N, Place E, Balluet P. Individual acoustic monitoring of the European eagle owl Bubo bubo. Ibis. 2008;150:279-87.
    Grecian VD, Diamond AW, Chardine JW. Sexing razorbills Alca torda breeding at Machias seal island, New Brunswick, Canada, using discriminant function analysis. Atlantic Seabirds. 2003;5:73-80.
    Green PT. Sexing birds by discriminant analysis: further considerations. Ibis. 1989;131:442-7.
    Griffiths R, Double MC, Orr K, Dawson R. A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol Ecol. 1998;7:1071-5.
    Guallar S, Quesada J, Gargallo G, Herrando S, Romero JM. Use of discriminant analysis in the sex determination of passerines breeding in the western Mediterranean. Revista Catalana d'Ornitologia. 2010;26:38-50.
    Gullion GW. Voice differences between sexes in the American coot. Condor. 1950;52:272-3.
    Hanson HC. Methods of determining age in Canada geese and other waterfowl. J Wildl Manage. 1949;13:177-83.
    Hardouin LA, Thompson R, Stenning M, Reby D. Anatomical bases of sex- and size-related acoustic variation in herring gull alarm calls. J Avian Biol. 2013;44:1-10.
    Herting BL, Belthoff JR. Bounce and double trill songs of male and female western screech-owls: characterization and usefulness for classification of sex. Auk. 2001;118:1095-101.
    Huchzermeyer FW. Diseases of Ostrich and Other Ratites. Pretoria: Agricultural Research Council; 1998.
    Hunt GL, Newman AL, Warner MH, Wingfield JC, Kaiwi J. Comparative behavior of male-female and female-female pairs among western gulls prior to egg-laying. Condor. 1984;86:157-62.
    James PC, Robertson HA. The calls of male and female Madeiran storm-petrels (Oceanodroma castro). Auk. 1985a;102:391-3.
    James PC, Robertson HA. Sexual dimorphism in the voice of the little shearwater Puffinus assimilis. Ibis. 1985b;127:388-90.
    James PC, Robertson HA. The call of bulwer's petrel (Bulweria bulwerii), and the relationship between intersexual call divergence and aerial calling in the nocturnal Procellariiformes. Auk. 1985c;102:878-82.
    Janicke T, Ritz MS, Hahn S, Peter H-U. Sex recognition in brown skuas: do acoustic signals matter? J Ornithol. 2007;148:565-9.
    Jensen T, Pernasetti FM, Durrant B. Conditions for rapid sex determination in 47 avian species by PCR of genomic DNA from blood, shell-membrane blood vessels, and feathers. Zoo Biol. 2003;22:561-71.
    Johnsgard PA. Tracheal anatomy of the Anatidae and its taxonomic significance. Wildfowl Trust Ann Rep. 1961;12:58-69.
    Klenova AV, Goncharova MV, Bragina EV, Kashentseva TA. Vocal development and voice breaking in Demoiselle Cranes (Anthropoides virgo). Bioacoustics. 2014;23:247-65.
    Klenova AV, Volodin IA, Volodina EV. Duet structure provides information about pair identity in the red-crowned crane (Grus japonensis). J Ethol. 2008;26:317-25.
    Klenova AV, Volodin IA, Volodina EV, Postelnykh KA. Voice breaking in adolescent red-crowned cranes (Grus japonenis). Behaviour. 2010;147:505-24.
    Klenova AV, Zubakin VA, Zubakina EV, Kolesnikova YA. Indicators of individuality and sex in advertising calls of two closely related auklet species (Charadriiformes, Alcidae): crested auklet and parakeet auklet (Aethia cristatella, Cyclorhynchus psittacula). Zool Zh. 2012;91:869-80.
    Koshmyanova NV, Tikhonov AV, Kharitonov SP. Spectro-temporal structure of alarm calls and sex differences in chicks of the black-headed gull (Larus ridibundus L.). Rep High Sch Biol Sci. 1984;6:30-3.
    Krechmar EA. Alarm duets of white-fronted geese, Anser albifrons. Zool Zh. 2003;82:1239-49.
    Lessells CM, Rowe CL, McGregor PK. Individual and sex differences in the provisioning calls of European bee-eaters. Anim Behav. 1995;49:244-7.
    Livezey BC. A phylogenetic analysis and classification of recent dabbling ducks (Tribe Anatini) based on comparative morphology. Auk. 1991;108:471-507.
    Livezey BC. A phylogenetic analysis of the whistling and white-backed ducks (Anatidae, Dendrocygninae) using morphological characters. Ann Carnegie Mus. 1995;64:65-97.
    Malagó W, Medaglia A, Matheucci E, Henrique-Silva F. New PCR multiplexes for sex typing of ostriches. Braz J Biol. 2005;65:743-5.
    Martin K, Cooke E. Bi-parental care in willow ptarmigan—a luxury? Anim Behav. 1987;35:369-79.
    Martin K, Horn AG, Hannon SJ. The calls and associated behavior of breeding willow ptarmigan in Canada. Wilson Bull. 1995;107:496-509.
    Matrosova VA, Volodin IA, Volodina EV, Vasilieva NA. Stability of acoustic individuality in the alarm calls of wild yellow ground squirrels Spermophilus fulvus and contrasting calls from trapped and free-ranging callers. Naturwissenschaften. 2010;97:707-15.
    Maurer G, Smith C, Süsser M, Magrath RD. Solo and duet calling in the pheasant coucal: sex and individual call differences in a nesting cuckoo with reversed size dimorphism. Aust J Zool. 2008;56:143-9.
    Miller WJ, Wagner FH. Sexing mature Columbiformes by cloacal characters. Auk. 1955;72:279-85.
    Mizuta T, Yamada H, Lin RS, Yodogawa Y, Okanoya K. Sexing white-rumped munias in Taiwan, using morphology, DNA and distance calls. Ornithol Sci. 2003;2:97-102.
    Monk DS, Koenig RD. Individual, brood and sex variation in begging calls of western bluebirds. Wilson Bull. 1997;109:328-32.
    Morinha F, Cabral JA, Bastos E. Molecular sexing of birds: a comparative review of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods. Theriogenology. 2012;78:703-14.
    Mudrik EA, Kashentseva TA, Gamburg EA, Gavrikova EY, Politov DV. Non-invasive method of sex identification of crane chicks by the DNA from capillary vessels of allantois. Russian J Devel Biol. 2013;44:279-82.
    Mulard H, Aubin T, White JF, Wagner RH, Danchin E. Voice variance may signify ongoing divergence among black-legged kittiwake populations. Biol J Linn Soc. 2009;97:289-97.
    Niemeier MM. Structural and functional aspects of vocal ontogeny in Grus canadensis (Gruidae: Aves). 1979. PhD thesis. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, p 135.
    Nuechterlein GL, Buitron D. Vocal advertising and sex recognition in eared grebes. Condor. 1992;94:937-43.
    O'Dwyer TW, Priddel D, Carlile N, Bartle JA, Buttemer WA. An evaluation of three field techniques for sexing Gould's petrels (Pterodroma leucoptera) (Procellariidae). Emu. 2006;106:245-52.
    Odom KJ, Mennill DJ. A quantitative description of the vocalizations and vocal activity of the barred owl. Condor. 2010;112:549-60.
    O'Huallachain D, Dunne J. Analysis of biometric data to determine the sex of woodpigeons Columba palumbus. Ring Migrat. 2010;25:29-32.
    Penhallurick J. World Bird Info. 2013. .
    Purchase HG. Raising geese. Farmers Bull. 1978;2251:1-14.
    Radford AN. Voice breaking in males results in sexual dimorphism of green woodhoopoe calls. Behaviour. 2004;141:555-69.
    Radesäter T. On the ontogeny of orienting movements in the triumph ceremony in two species of geese (Anser anser L. and Branta canadensis L.). Behaviour. 1974;50:1-15.
    Regnaut S, Lucas FS, Fumagalli L. DNA degradation in avian faecal samples and feasibility of non-invasive genetic studies of threatened capercaillie populations. Conserv Gen. 2006;7:449-53.
    Richner H. Avian laparoscopy as a field technique for sexing birds and an assessment of its effects on wild birds. J Field Ornithol. 1989;60:137-42.
    Saino N, de Ayala RM, Boncoraglio G, Martinelli R. Sex difference in mouth coloration and begging calls of barn swallow nestlings. Anim Behav. 2008;75:1375-82.
    Saino N, Galeotti P, Sacchi R, Boncoraglio G, Martinelli R, Molle A. Sex differences in begging vocalizations of nestling barn swallows, Hirundo rustica. Anim Behav. 2003;66:1003-10.
    Schwing R, Parsons S, Nelson XJ. Vocal repertoire of the New Zealand kea parrot Nestor notabilis. Curr Zool. 2012;58:727-40.
    Serventy DL. A method of sexing petrels in field observations. Emu. 1956;56:213-4.
    Simons TR. Behavior and attendance patterns of the fork-tailed storm petrel. Auk. 1981;98:145-58.
    Smith GC, Jones DN. Vocalizations of the marbled frogmouth I: descriptions and an analysis of sex differences. Emu. 1997;97:290-5.
    Soley JT, Groenewals HB. Reproduction. In: Deeming DC, editor. The Ostrich, Biology, Production and Health. New York: CABI Publishing; 1999. p. 129-58.
    Steyn P, Scott J. Notes on the breeding biology of the wood owl. Ostrich. 1972;44:118-25.
    Swanson DA, Rappole JH. Determining the sex of adult white-winged doves by cloacal characteristics. North Am Bird Bander. 1992;17:137-9.
    Swengel SR. Sex determination. In: Ellis D, Gee G, Mirande C, editors. Cranes: their biology, husbandry, and conservation. Baraboo: ICF; 1996. p. 223-9.
    Taoka M, Okumura H. Sexual differences in flight calls and the cue for vocal sex recognition of swinhoe's storm-petrels. Condor. 1990;92:571-5.
    Taoka M, Sato T, Kamada T, Okumura H. Sexual dimorphism of chatter-calls and vocal sex recognition in Leach's storm-petrels (Oceanodroma leucorhoa). Auk. 1989a;106:498-501.
    Taoka M, Won P-O, Okumura H. Vocal behavior of swinhoe's storm-petrel (Oceanodroma monorhis). Auk. 1989b;106:471-4.
    ten Thoren A, Bergmann H-H. Die Entwicklung der Lautausserungen bei der Graugans (Anser anser). J Ornithol. 1987;128:181-207.
    Tikhonov AV. Acoustic signalization and ecology of birds. Moscow: Moscow University Press; 1986. p. 236.
    Turner L. A rapid method of sexing Canada geese. J Wildl Manage. 1953;17:542-3.
    Venuto V, Ferraiuolo V, Bottoni L, Massa R. Distress call in six species of African Poicephalus parrots. Ethol Ecol Evol. 2001;13:49-68.
    Volodin IA. Behavior repertoire of Rufibrenta ruficollis (Anserini, Anseriformes). 1. Locomotory behaviour. Zool Zh. 1990a; 69(9):57-66.
    Volodin IA. Behavior repertoire of Rufibrenta ruficollis. 2. Acoustic behaviour. Zool Zh. 1990b; 69(10):98-106.
    Volodin IA. Setting-up and maintaining social relations within groups of red-breasted geese (Rufibrenta rificollis Pall.) in captivity. Bull Soc Nat Moscow Biol B. 1990c;95(3):42-50.
    Volodin IA, Volodina EV, Klenova AV. Non-invasive sex recognition in the white-faced whistling duck. Int Zoo News. 2003;50(3):160-7.
    Volodin IA, Volodina EV, Matrosova VA, Kholodova MV. Bioacoustical sexing with playback-evoked loud whistles in the Cuban whistling duck Dendrocygna arborea. Sci Res Zool. 2005a;18:105-12.
    Volodin I, Kaiser M, Matrosova V, Volodina E, Klenova A, Filatova O, Kholodova M. The technique of noninvasive distant sexing for four monomorphic Dendrocygna whistling duck species by their loud whistles. Bioacoustics. 2009;18:277-90.
    Volodin IA, Klenova AV, Volodina EV. Modelling bioacoustical monitoring through years with captive population of the red-breasted goose. Casarca Bull Goose Swan Duck Study Group North Eurasia. 2008;11(1):22-46.
    Volodin IA, Volodina EV, Klenova AV, Filatova OA. Individual and sexual differences in the calls of the monomorphic white-faced whistling duck Dendrocygna viduata. Acta Ornithol. 2005b;40:43-52.
  • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(39)

    1. Lúcio de Souza, M.O., Lima, F.M.D., Barbosa, L.D.S. et al. Proposal for the use of morphometry as a sexing method for psittacine species Amazona amazonica, Amazona aestiva, Ara chloropterus, Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus, and Ara ararauna. Avian Biology Research, 2025, 18(3): 102-107. DOI:10.1177/17581559251336691
    2. Diniz, P., Silva-Jr, E.F., Rech, G.S. et al. Duets convey information about pair and individual identities in a Neotropical bird. Current Zoology, 2025, 71(4): 456-468. DOI:10.1093/cz/zoae064
    3. Huang, W., Chen, P., Wei, J. et al. Intelligent Identification Model for Male-female Pigeons Based on Audio | [基于音频的肉鸽雌雄智能鉴别模型研究]. Nongye Jixie Xuebao Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2025, 56(7): 596-607. DOI:10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2025.07.056
    4. Tan, S., Zhan, T., Zeng, F. et al. Visualization of Sex Identification in Red-Crowned Crane (Grus japonensis) via Recombinase-Aided Amplification Combined With Pyrococcus furiosus Argonaute Assay. Ecology and Evolution, 2025, 15(7): e71780. DOI:10.1002/ece3.71780
    5. Crane, A.H., Baldry, C.J., Rankin, K.E. et al. The three-dimensional structure of medullary bone: Novel criteria for the identification of avian sex-specific bone tissue. Developmental Biology, 2025. DOI:10.1016/j.ydbio.2025.02.007
    6. Indriyani, T., Mulyani, Y.A., Rinaldi, D. Patterns of Vocalization in Sooty-Headed Bulbul in a Campus Area of Dramaga, Bogor. Iop Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 2025, 1506(1): 012002. DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/1506/1/012002
    7. Kannan, A., Basu, J., Roy, R. et al. Gender identification of chicks using vocalisation signals, artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques: current status and future prospects. World S Poultry Science Journal, 2025, 81(1): 87-102. DOI:10.1080/00439339.2024.2438351
    8. Roy, S., Gopi Sundar, K.S. Knowing a kurr from a korrr: acoustic signatures of the sexes are encoded in duets of the monomorphic Sarus Crane (Antigone antigone). Bioacoustics, 2025, 34(4): 447-467. DOI:10.1080/09524622.2025.2500386
    9. Pietro, D.B., Nora, C.V., Arnaud, T. et al. Is provisioning rate of parents and helpers influenced by the simulated presence of novel individuals?. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2025, 79(1): 14. DOI:10.1007/s00265-024-03548-2
    10. Yin, J.J., Li, W.G., Liu, Y.F. et al. Sex identification of ducklings based on acoustic signals. Poultry Science, 2024, 103(6): 103711. DOI:10.1016/j.psj.2024.103711
    11. Petrou, E.L., Scott, L.C., McKeeman, C.M. et al. Molecular sexing of birds using quantitative PCR (qPCR) of sex-linked genes and logistic regression models. Molecular Ecology Resources, 2024, 24(4): e13946. DOI:10.1111/1755-0998.13946
    12. Osiecka, A.N., Briefer, E.F., Kidawa, D. et al. Seabird’s cry: repertoire and vocal expression of contextual valence in the little auk (Alle alle). Scientific Reports, 2023, 13(1): 8623. DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-35857-3
    13. Fitriana, F., Al Qodry, M.F.U.Z., De Lucas, J.C.G. et al. Appropriate Primer Selection Improves Molecular Bird Sexing Accuracy. Buletin Peternakan, 2023, 47(4): 215-219. DOI:10.21059/buletinpeternak.v47i4.83320
    14. Garcia-Raventós, A., Muñoz-Mérida, A., Lapiedra, O. et al. Identification of sex-linked SNP markers in wild populations of monomorphic birds. Molecular Ecology Resources, 2023, 23(8): 1905-1913. DOI:10.1111/1755-0998.13862
    15. Appel, C.L., Lesmeister, D.B., Duarte, A. et al. Using passive acoustic monitoring to estimate northern spotted owl landscape use and pair occupancy. Ecosphere, 2023, 14(2): e4421. DOI:10.1002/ecs2.4421
    16. Basu, J., Roy, R., Pal, M. et al. Gender Detection of Day-Old Chicks from Vocalization Data: An Experimental Study. 2023. DOI:10.1109/INDICON59947.2023.10440685
    17. Tan, X., Lin, A., Sun, K. et al. Greater Horseshoe Bats Recognize the Sex and Individual Identity of Conspecifics from Their Echolocation Calls. Animals, 2022, 12(24): 3490. DOI:10.3390/ani12243490
    18. Chen, S., Tang, Y., Zou, X. et al. Identification and Detection of Biological Information on Tiny Biological Targets Based on Subtle Differences. Machines, 2022, 10(11): 996. DOI:10.3390/machines10110996
    19. Cuan, K., Li, Z., Zhang, T. et al. Gender determination of domestic chicks based on vocalization signals. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2022. DOI:10.1016/j.compag.2022.107172
    20. Kostoglou, K.N., Miller, E.H., Weston, M.A. et al. Vocal traits of shorebird chicks are related to body mass and sex. Ibis, 2022, 164(3): 816-824. DOI:10.1111/ibi.13055
    21. James, B.S., Gridley, T., McGovern, B. et al. Dorsal fin mark changes for assigning sexes to individual bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus. Marine Mammal Science, 2022, 38(3): 1140-1159. DOI:10.1111/mms.12923
    22. Segall, M.A., Gonzaga, L.P., Kenup, C.F. et al. A novel method for analysis of vocal dimorphism using recordings of unsexed pairs and its application to the neotropical owl Pulsatrix koeniswaldiana. Journal of Ornithology, 2022, 163(2): 589-598. DOI:10.1007/s10336-022-01965-6
    23. Guggenberger, M., Adreani, N.M., Foerster, K. et al. Vocal recognition of distance calls in a group-living basal bird: the greylag goose, Anser anser. Animal Behaviour, 2022. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2022.01.004
    24. De Rosa, A., Castro, I., Marsland, S. The acoustic playback technique in avian fieldwork contexts: a systematic review and recommendations for best practice. Ibis, 2022, 164(2): 371-387. DOI:10.1111/ibi.13033
    25. Bowmaker-Falconer, K., Thiebault, A., Connan, M. et al. Sexual and individual signatures are encoded in the temporal rate of Cape Gannet Morus capensis display calls. Ostrich, 2022, 93(2): 106-119. DOI:10.2989/00306525.2022.2113926
    26. Schneiderová, I., Vodička, R. Bioacoustics as a tool to monitor the estrus cycle in a female slow loris (Nycticebus sp.). Zoo Biology, 2021, 40(6): 575-583. DOI:10.1002/zoo.21637
    27. Thompson, H.L., Gordon, N.M. First Description of Nesting Behavior of a Same-Sex Pair of Whooping Cranes (Grus americana) in the Reintroduced Eastern Migratory Population. Waterbirds, 2021, 43(3-4): 326-332. DOI:10.1675/063.043.0312
    28. Austin, V.I., Dalziell, A.H., Langmore, N.E. et al. Avian vocalisations: the female perspective. Biological Reviews, 2021, 96(4): 1484-1503. DOI:10.1111/brv.12713
    29. Schneider, S., Dierkes, P.W. Localize Animal Sound Events Reliably (LASER): A New Software for Sound Localization in Zoos. Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens, 2021, 2(2): 146-163. DOI:10.3390/jzbg2020011
    30. Wood, C.M., Klinck, H., Gustafson, M. et al. Using the ecological significance of animal vocalizations to improve inference in acoustic monitoring programs. Conservation Biology, 2021, 35(1): 336-345. DOI:10.1111/cobi.13516
    31. Heaphy, K., Cain, K. Song variation between sexes and among subspecies of New Zealand Fantail (Rhipidura fuliginosa). Emu, 2021, 121(3): 198-210. DOI:10.1080/01584197.2021.1886589
    32. Gridley, T., Gardiner, C.E.C. To honk or to hiss: uncovering call complexity in the Egyptian Goose Alopochen aegyptiaca. Ostrich, 2021, 92(1): 58-69. DOI:10.2989/00306525.2021.1907470
    33. Aigueperse, N., Houdelier, C., Nicolle, C. et al. Mother-chick interactions are affected by chicks’ sex and brood composition in Japanese quail. Developmental Psychobiology, 2019, 61(6): 832-842. DOI:10.1002/dev.21848
    34. Ketz, A.C., Johnson, T.L., Hooten, M.B. et al. A hierarchical Bayesian approach for handling missing classification data. Ecology and Evolution, 2019, 9(6): 3130-3140. DOI:10.1002/ece3.4927
    35. Adachi, H., Soma, M. Vocalization can mediate male-male sexual interactions in Java sparrows. Animal Biology, 2019, 69(1): 5-15. DOI:10.1163/15707563-00001051
    36. Lehnen, L., Schorcht, W., Karst, I. et al. Using Approximate Bayesian Computation to infer sex ratios from acoustic data. Plos One, 2018, 13(6): e0199428. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0199428
    37. Zhang, L., Shu, M., An, B. et al. Biparental incubation pattern of the Black-necked Crane on an alpine plateau. Journal of Ornithology, 2017, 158(3): 697-705. DOI:10.1007/s10336-017-1439-6
    38. Hamadani, H., Khan, A.A., Hamadani, A. et al. Practical methods of gender identification in Kashmir geese. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2017, 87(5): 653-655.
    39. Sadeghi, M., Banakar, A. Gender determination of fowls by using bioacoustical data mining methods and support vector machine. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017, 19(5): 1041-1055.

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Vera A. Matrosova

    1. On this Site
    2. On Google Scholar
    3. On PubMed

    Figures(13)  /  Tables(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (295) PDF downloads (44) Cited by(39)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return