Sanjaya Weerakkody, Eben Goodale, Vimukthi R. Gunasekara, Yang Liu, Praveen Karanth, Sampath S. Seneviratne. 2023: Plumage assisted divergence in a vocally complex island endemic: The Dicrurus paradiseus species complex in Sri Lanka. Avian Research, 14(1): 100132. DOI: 10.1016/j.avrs.2023.100132
Citation: Sanjaya Weerakkody, Eben Goodale, Vimukthi R. Gunasekara, Yang Liu, Praveen Karanth, Sampath S. Seneviratne. 2023: Plumage assisted divergence in a vocally complex island endemic: The Dicrurus paradiseus species complex in Sri Lanka. Avian Research, 14(1): 100132. DOI: 10.1016/j.avrs.2023.100132

Plumage assisted divergence in a vocally complex island endemic: The Dicrurus paradiseus species complex in Sri Lanka

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    E-mail address: sam@sci.cmb.ac.lk (S.S. Seneviratne)

  • Received Date: 21 Jan 2023
  • Rev Recd Date: 19 Jul 2023
  • Accepted Date: 29 Jul 2023
  • Available Online: 10 Jan 2024
  • Publish Date: 27 Aug 2023
  • Models of allopatric speciation within an island biogeographic framework suggest that the division of ancestral mainland populations leads to one or more allopatric island species predominantly through natural and sexual selection or genetic drift. Here we studied phenotypic divergence in a phylogenetic framework in the Dicrurus paradiseus allospecies complex in Sri Lanka, a continental island located in the Indian plate, to understand the complexity of phenotypic divergence on an island. Members of the genus Dicrurus are known as drongos and are conserved in morphology and plumage, but highly variable in vocalization due to vocal learning and mimicry. Two closely related drongos are found in Sri Lanka: the endemic D. lophorinus (or D. paradiseus lophorinus to many authors) found in the wet zone of the island and the widespread continental species D. paradiseus, which inhabits the dry zone. Sampling from all major populations, and voucher specimens from museums across their range in Sri Lanka, we examined phenotypic and genetic variation in this group. The phenotype showed two clusters: birds with a fish-like tail and erect crest (D. lophorinus), and birds with elongated tail streamers with backwardly curved crest (D. paradiseus). There was no significant difference in the vocal traits compared. The genetic variation was examined using two nuclear (Myo 2 and c-mos) and two mitochondrial (ND2 and Cytb) loci and the phylogenetic relationship was analyzed using the Bayesian inference coalescent-based species tree estimation method. The quantitative criteria for species delimitation provided a score sufficient to consider these two taxa as distinct species by considering measurements of body and plumage, acoustics, behaviour and distribution. The phylogeny supports distinct species status for the Sri Lanka Drongo (Dicrurus lophorinus) and that the D. lophorinus and D. paradiseus sister pair diverged since 1.35 mya. The variation in the crest and the tail plumage (components of phenotype) were the main contributors of the divergence, despite the similarity in general appearance and vocalization of the allopatric species.

  • Studies of animal behavior are conducted with the assistance of a variety of objects, including living animals (Ladu et al., 2015; Lawson et al., 2021) and non-living models comprising many different materials (Antunes and Biala, 2012; Lawson et al., 2021). These objects serve as stimuli in studies of the behavioral responses of animals within and across species, such as to conspecific intruders, potential mates, predators, and brood parasites. Non-living models, which may serve as replacements for systems involving living animals, are currently used frequently in animal behavior research, and they can be produced in a variety of ways. These models include the following: 1) taxidermy specimens from which the fur and/or feathers have been preserved, the body cavity stuffed with fillers such as cotton, and which have been preserved in antiseptic have been used by most studies, and include both stuffed models made by the researchers themselves and those borrowed from museums (Gill and Sealy, 1996; Schulze-Hagen et al., 2003; Welbergen and Davies, 2008; Henger and Hauber, 2014; Lawson et al., 2020); 2) sculptural models, which are produced by craftspeople from wood or plastic and then painted in the appropriate colors (Welbergen and Davies, 2012; Thorogood and Davies, 2016); 3) freeze-dried models, which are the direct sublimation of the solvent from the frozen animal's body at ultra-low temperatures, and are more durable than taxidermy specimens and maintain a relatively lifelike appearance (Bazin and Sealy, 1993; Maizato et al., 2013; Shoffner and Brittingham, 2013); and 4) three-dimensional (3D) printed models produced using 3D-printing technology, which have developed rapidly in recent years because of their repeatable, precise, and standardized production qualities (Conner et al., 2014; Behm et al., 2018). Inevitably, 3D-printed models also have certain limitations: they are static, and thus unable to simulate living organisms; only small objects can be printed; and their materials they are made of may contain toxic chemicals or be difficult to degrade. However, these deficiencies can be addressed by installing robots inside the models, assembling multiple printed parts into a larger model, and using recyclable materials (Walker and Humphries, 2019).

    Although 3D-printing technology has been widely used in some aspects of behavioral studies, it is rarely used in avian brood parasitism (ABP), especially for studies of behavioral reaction to nest intruders (but see Chaumont et al., 2021), not to mention being recognized as a standard methodology in this research domain. However, using models as research tools is important in studies of ABP. Because the parasitism includes a series of steps from approaching a host nest (Feeney et al., 2012) to laying a parasite egg (Peer and Sealy, 1999; Soler, 2014) and manipulating the host parent (Soler et al., 1995, 1999; Swan et al., 2015), testing the host response against the parasite and its egg is a key to understand the coevolutionary interaction between the host and parasite. For example, to test the recognition on parasite egg by the host, model eggs that simulate the parasite eggs were widely used for artificial parasitism. The standard method for this experiment was to use hand-made model eggs made of polymer clay (Antonov et al., 2009; Yi et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2022a, b). Hitherto, only few studies have used 3D-printed model eggs for artificial parasitism (Igic et al., 2015; Dainson et al., 2017; Hays and Hauber, 2018; Abolins-Abols et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2019; Butler et al., 2020; Luro et al., 2020; Hauber et al., 2021). Furthermore, to test the host response toward parasite approaching its nest for parasitism, researchers generally used taxidermy specimen as a standard method (Gill and Sealy, 1996; Welbergen and Davies, 2008; Henger and Hauber, 2014; Lawson et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2022a, b), while using 3D-printed animal model was rare and its feasibility has not been evaluated. For example, Chaumont et al. (2021) used 3D-printed cuckoo models for ABP studies, but they did not make a comprehensive comparison and evaluation between 3D-printed models and taxidermy specimens. The purpose of this study is to provide an applied example of the use of 3D-printed models that simulate avian predators and brood parasites to test the behavioral reaction of a widespread bird species, the Oriental Reed Warbler (Acrocephalus orientalis), and also to evaluate the feasibility and advantages of using 3D-printed animal models for studies of animal behavior. We also provide some suggestions for future studies on ABP with 3D-printed animal models.

    We performed this study in Yongnianwa National Wetland Park (36°40ʹ–36°41ʹ N, 114°41ʹ–114°45ʹ E) during the breeding season (May–July) of the Oriental Reed Warbler (hereafter the Reed Warbler) in 2021. The study site is a wetland habitat in a temperate semi-humid continental monsoon climate in Hebei Province in China, with the Common Reed (Phragmites australis) being the major herbaceous plant. The annual average temperature is 12.9 ​℃, and the annual average precipitation totals 527.8 ​mm (Wang and Yang, 2020). The Reed Warbler belongs to the family Acrocephalidae, Passeriformes (Zheng, 2017), and is one of the main hosts of the Common Cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) in the study area; previous studies have found a parasitic rate of 14.8% in this study population (Ma et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2021).

    We used three types of 3D-printed animal models, one each of the Sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus), Common Cuckoo, and Oriental Turtle Dove (Streptopelia orientalis). These were designed using 3D Studio Max 2015 for Windows (Autodesk Inc., California, USA) and printed on a Digital Light Processing (DLP) 3D printer (StarRAY SP-DD230, Sprintray Inc., Guangdong, China). The models were then painted according to the natural phenotype of the animals (Fig. 1). These species are all sympatric with the Reed Warbler. The Sparrowhawk is a predator that preys on adult Reed Warblers (Wang et al., 2021) and the Common Cuckoo (hereafter the Cuckoo) is a brood parasite and nest predator that can threaten the nest, but not the adult Reed Warbler (Yang et al., 2017). The Oriental Turtle Dove (hereafter the Dove) is harmless to the Reed Warbler and here served as a control.

    Figure  1.  The 3D-printed animal models used for testing the behavioral response of the Oriental Reed Warbler: (A) Sparrowhawk; (B) Common Cuckoo; (C) Oriental Turtle Dove.

    In the experiment, each Reed Warbler nest during the early incubation stage (the first three days of incubation) received the three animal models above as stimuli, with 1-h intervals between every two models. Each model was randomly selected and placed at a distance of 0.5 ​m in front of a nest, at the same height as the nest. We recorded the reaction from the Reed Warbler over the next 5 ​min with a digital video recorder (DMC-TS30, Panasonic Corporation, Xiamen, China), dividing actions into attacking (score ​= ​4), mobbing (score ​= ​3), alarm calling (score ​= ​2), and no reaction (score ​= ​1). We recorded the strongest level of reaction (a higher score refers to a stronger level) if a Reed Warbler presented more than one reaction during the experiment. A result of no reaction refers to the Reed Warbler ignoring the decoy. To evaluate the use of 3D-printed animal models, we conducted another experiment with the same procedure except the animal models were replaced with taxidermy specimens, these being a classical method for testing the behavioral reactions of animals. To avoid pseudoreplication, two replicates of 3D-printed animal models or taxidermy specimens were randomly selected for the experiment. The Reed Warbler is sexually monomorphic, so we did not distinguish different individuals by sex during experiments.

    A cumulative link mixed model (CLMM) was used to analyze the reaction of Reed Warbler toward different types of stimuli. In this experiment the reaction (score 1–4) was the response; the trial (3D-printed animal model vs. taxidermy specimens), stimuli (Sparrowhawk, Cuckoo, or Dove), and replicate (two per model or specimen) were included as the fixed effects; and the clutch size, egg-laying date (of first egg), and nest identity were used as the random effects. The interactions between trial and stimuli and between trial and replicate were also tested. A post-hoc test using the Tukey method for P-value adjustment was used for pairwise comparison between different stimuli according to the trial.

    The Dove is harmless to the Reed Warbler, so it was used here as a reference for reaction comparison. We predicted that the Dove would elicit the least intense reaction out of the three stimuli. The Cuckoo is a brood parasite and predator to the nest, and while it can have a highly negative impact on the reproductive success of the Reed Warbler, it is not dangerous to the adult birds themselves. The Sparrowhawk is a bird of prey, threatening adult Reed Warblers. Therefore, we predicted that the warblers would react more strongly to the Cuckoo than to the Sparrowhawk, because the former should trigger a mobbing and attacking reaction that is effective against the Cuckoo but dangerous when used on the Sparrowhawk. Furthermore, we predicted that the Reed Warbler would react consistently to the specimens and 3D-printed models if the latter was feasible as a substitution for the former.

    The reaction scores for the Dove, Cuckoo, and Sparrowhawk taxidermy specimens were 1.467 ​± ​0.516, 3.333 ​± ​0.816, and 2.267 ​± ​0.799, respectively (n ​= ​15 for all). For the 3D-printed animal models, these values were 1.467 ​± ​0.516, 3.400 ​± ​0.632, and 2.133 ​± ​0.640 (n ​= ​15 for all). As we predicted, the reaction intensity followed a gradient from Dove (lowest) to Sparrowhawk (medium) to Cuckoo (highest). CLMM analyses showed that neither the trial (Z ​= ​0.228, P ​= ​0.819) nor the replicate (Z ​= ​0.134, P ​= ​0.893) had any significant differences. However, the Reed Warbler's reactions to stimuli did differ significantly between Dove and Cuckoo (Z ​= ​5.495, P ​ < ​0.001, CLMM) and between Dove and Sparrowhawk (Z ​= ​3.841, P ​ < ​0.001, CLMM). No statistically significant differences were observed in the interaction between trial and stimuli, nor between the trial and replicate (Table 1). Pairwise comparison indicated significant differences between the reactions of the Reed Warbler to the Cuckoo and to the Sparrowhawk for both specimens (t ​= ​4.398, P ​ < ​0.001, Post-hoc test) and 3D-printed models (t ​= ​5.222, P ​ < ​0.001, Post-hoc test; Table 2).

    Table  1.  Reaction of Oriental Reed Warbler to different stimuli by using cumulative link mixed model.
    Fixed effect Reference variable Compared variable Estimate SE Z P
    Trial Specimen 3D model 0.134 0.585 0.228 0.819
    Stimuli Dove Cuckoo 3.816 0.694 5.495 < 0.001
    Sparrowhawk 1.876 0.539 3.841 < 0.001
    Replicate Replicate 1 Replicate 2 0.053 0.398 0.134 0.893
    Trial × Stimuli Specimen × Dove 3D model × Cuckoo 0.110 0.646 0.169 0.865
    3D model × Sparrowhawk −0.217 0.645 −0.336 0.737
    Trial × replicate Specimen × Replicate 1 Model × Replicate 2 −0.301 0.574 −0.524 0.600
    Random effect: clutch size, egg-laying date, and nest identity.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table  2.  Results of pairwise comparison between stimuli for specimens and models using Tukey method.
    Empty Cell Estimate SE df t P
    Taxidermy specimens
    Cuckoo vs. Dove 1.867 0.243 84 7.696 < 0.001
    Cuckoo vs. Sparrowhawk 1.067 0.243 84 4.398 < 0.001
    Dove vs. Sparrowhawk −0.800 0.243 84 −3.298 0.004
    3D-printed models
    Cuckoo vs. Dove 1.933 0.243 84 7.97 < 0.001
    Cuckoo vs. Sparrowhawk 1.267 0.243 84 5.222 < 0.001
    Dove vs. Sparrowhawk −0.667 0.243 84 −2.748 0.019
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Our results indicated that the Reed Warbler was reacting to the taxidermy specimens and 3D-printed animal models consistently. This study thus supports the conclusion that the use of 3D-printed animal models to substitute specimens is a feasible means of testing animal behavior. We suggest that the use of 3D-printed animal models should be extended as a standard method for studies of host nest defense in ABP because of their clear advantages: (1) High sustainability: compared to living animals or taxidermy specimens, 3D-printed models are more sustainable in utilization because they are beneficial for the biological conservation. The taxidermy specimens need strict storage conditions and are easily damaged (e.g., destroyed by the host) during experiments (Davies and Brooke, 1988; Welbergen and Davies, 2008, 2012), which undoubtedly leads to a need for constant supplement. Such a requirement for specimens would involve commercial interests, which may have a negative effect on the natural animal population, especially in developing and underdeveloped countries. (2) High comparability: using 3D-printed models would increase the comparability between different studies because their postures can be controlled and standardized, allowing for specific criteria to be shared between different studies. For example, researchers around the world can share their 3D model documents through scientific references. By contrast, both the posture and color may vary across different studies that use animal specimens or handcrafted models because they differ between manufacturers and crafters. It is impossible to make highly consistent specimens or handcrafted models, even from the same craftsperson. (3) High controllability: for the 3D-printed models, it is easy to manipulate one of the characteristics while controlling for others, which allows us to test the animal response to a specific trait or a combination of some traits optionally and independently. This idea has been proposed for the use of 3D-printed model eggs, which allows the researchers to change the characteristics of model eggs in one dimension while controlling for others (Yang et al., 2019). For the animal models, they have more characteristics and are more complicated, which makes such controllability more significant. For example, to test the size effect of nest intruders on host response, we can simply manipulate the size of the animal models while keeping all the other traits consistent. Yu et al. (2020) tested such size effects on a host, but the taxidermy specimens they used differed across many other traits because the specimens were different parasite species. It is not possible to change some characteristics of the taxidermy specimens while controlling for others, but this is easy for 3D-printed animal models.

    In summary, this study provides supportive evidence that 3D-printed animal models can be used as a standard method for studies of ABP. The use of 3D-printed animal models brings a series of advantages, which are beneficial for biological conservation and make research studies more comparable and controllable. We believe this standard method allows the researchers to collect more objective and scientific data, which could reveal the visual signal cues of host recognition in more detail and thus help us better understand the coevolution between brood parasites and hosts in ABP studies.

    CY designed the study, and YC and CY carried out laboratory and statistical analyses. XC and JW performed field experiments. XC and CY wrote the draft manuscript, and CY improved the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    The experiments comply with the current laws of China. Fieldwork was carried out under the permission from the Yongniwa National Natural Park.

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    This study was supported by the Education Department of Hainan Province (HnjgY2022-12), Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (320CXTD437 and 2019RC189), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32260127 and 31672303) to CY, and the Hainan Provincial Innovative Research Program for Graduates (Qhyb2021-55) to XC.

  • Ali, S., Ripley, S.D., 1972. Handbook of the Birds of India and Pakistan Together with Those of Nepal, Sikkim, Bhutan and Ceylon. Oxford University Press, London.
    Baptista, L.F., Trail, P.W., 1992. The role of song in the evolution of passerine diversity. Syst. Biol. 41, 242–247. .
    Billing, A.M., Lee, A.M., Skjelseth, S., Borg, A.A., Hale, M.C., Slate, J., et al., 2012. Evidence of inbreeding depression but not inbreeding avoidance in a natural house sparrow population. Mol. Ecol. 21, 1487–1499. .
    Blyth, E., 1847. XIII—drafts for a fauna indica. J. Nat. Hist. 19, 98–108.
    Bolund, E., Martin, K., Kempenaers, B., Forstmeier, W., 2010. Inbreeding depression of sexually selected traits and attractiveness in the zebra finch. Anim. Behav. 79, 947–955. .
    Bouckaert, R., Vaughan, T.G., Barido-Sottani, J., Duchêne, S., Fourment, M., Gavryushkina, A., et al., 2019. BEAST 2.5: an advanced software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 15, e1006650. .
    Clayton, N.S., 1990. Assortative mating in zebra finch subspecies, Taeniopygia guttata guttata and T. g. castanotis. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B 330, 351–370. .
    Conte, G.L., Arnegard, M.E., Peichel, C.L., Schluter, D., 2012. The probability of genetic parallelism and convergence in natural populations. Proc. R. Soc. A B 279, 5039–5047. .
    Cooper, A., Penny, D., 1997. Mass survival of birds across the Cretaceous–Tertiary Boundary: molecular evidence. Science 275, 1109–1113. .
    Coyne, J.A., Price, T.D., 2000. Little evidence for sympatric speciation in island birds. Evolution 54, 2166–2171.
    de Queiroz, K., 2005. Ernst Mayr and the modern concept of species. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 6600–6607. .
    de Queiroz, K., 2007. Species concepts and species delimitation. Syst. Biol. 56, 879–886. .
    DeRose, M.A., Roff, D.A., 1999. A comparison of inbreeding depression in life-history and morphological traits in animals. Evolution 53, 1288–1292. .
    Drummond, A.J., Rambaut, A., 2007. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, 214. .
    Drummond, A.J., Rambaut, A., Bouckaert, R., Xie, W., 2015. Divergence Dating Tutorial with BEAST 2.2. x. Retrieved from. . (Accessed 17 March 2022).
    Edwards, S.V., Kingan, S.B., Calkins, J.D., Balakrishnan, C.N., Jennings, W.B., Swanson, W.J., et al., 2005. Speciation in birds: genes, geography, and sexual selection. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 6550–6557. .
    Fernando, S.P., Irwin, D.E., Seneviratne, S.S., 2016. Phenotypic and genetic analysis support distinct species status of the Red-backed Woodpecker (Lesser Sri Lanka Flameback: Dinopium psarodes) of Sri Lanka. Auk 133, 497–511, 415.
    Fuchs, J., Bowie, R.C.K., Fjeldså, J., Pasquet, E., 2004. Phylogenetic relationships of the african bush-shrikes and helmet-shrikes (Passeriformes: Malaconotidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 33, 428–439. .
    Fuchs, J., Fjeldså, J., Pasquet, E., 2005. The use of mitochondrial and nuclear sequence data in assessing the taxonomic status of the endangered Uluguru Bush Shrike Malaconotus alius. Ibis 147, 717–724. .
    Fuchs, J., Fjeldså, J., Pasquet, E., 2006. An ancient African radiation of corvoid birds (Aves: Passeriformes) detected by mitochondrial and nuclear sequence data. Zool. Scripta 35, 375–385. .
    Fuchs, J., Cruaud, C., Couloux, A., Pasquet, E., 2007. Complex biogeographic history of the cuckoo-shrikes and allies (Passeriformes: Campephagidae) revealed by mitochondrial and nuclear sequence data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 44, 138–153. .
    Fuchs, J., Parra, J.L., Goodman, S.M., Raherilalao, M.J., Vanderwal, J., Bowie, R.C.K., 2013. Extending ecological niche models to the past 120,000 years corroborates the lack of strong phylogeographic structure in the Crested Drongo (Dicrurus forficatus forficatus) on Madagascar. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 108, 658–676. .
    Fuchs, J., Fjeldså, J., Bowie, R.C.K., 2017. Diversification across major biogeographic breaks in the African Shining/square-tailed Drongos complex (Passeriformes: Dicruridae). Zool. Scripta 46, 27–41. .
    Fuchs, J., de Swardt, D.H., Oatley, G., Fjeldså, J., Bowie, R.C.K., 2018. Habitat-driven diversification, hybridization and cryptic diversity in the fork-tailed Drongo (Passeriformes: Dicruridae: Dicrurus adsimilis). Zool. Scripta 47, 266–284. .
    Gill, F.B., 1998. Hybridization in birds. Auk 115, 281–283. .
    Goodale, E., Kotagama, S.W., 2006. Context-dependent vocal mimicry in a passerine bird. Proc. R. Soc. A B 273, 875–880. .
    Goodale, E., Kotagama, S.W., 2008. Response to conspecific and heterospecific alarm calls in mixed-species bird flocks of a Sri Lankan rainforest. Behav. Ecol. 19, 887–894. .
    Grant, P.R., Grant, B.R., 1992. Hybridization of bird species. Science 256, 193–197. .
    Grant, P.R., Grant, B.R., 1996. Speciation and hybridization in island birds. Phil. Trans. Biol. Sci. 351, 765–772.
    Haase, R.F., Ellis, M.V., 1987. Multivariate analysis of variance. J. Counsel. Psychol. 34, 404.
    Hasegawa, M., Kishino, H., Yano, T., 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 22, 160–174. .
    Henry, G.M., 1971. A Guide to the Birds of Sri Lanka, 2 ed. Oxford University Press, London.
    Heslewood, M.M., Elphinstone, M.S., Tidemann, S.C., Baverstock, P.R., 1998. Myoglobin intron variation in the Gouldian Finch Erythrura gouldiae assessed by temperature gradient gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 19, 142–151. .
    Holdsworth, E.W.H., 1872. Birds of Ceylon. Catalogue of the birds found in Ceylon: with some remarks on their habits and local distribution, and descriptions of two new species peculiar to the Island. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond.
    Illera, J.C., Palmero, A.M., Laiolo, P., Rodríguez, F., Moreno, Á. C., Navascués, M., 2014. Genetic, morphological, and acoustic evidence reveals lack of diversification in the colonization process in an island bird. Evolution 68, 2259–2274. .
    Jones, I.L., Hunter, F.M., 1993. Mutual sexual selection in a monogamous seabird. Nature 362, 238–239. .
    Kelaart, E.F., Gardner, G., 1852. Prodromus Faunae Zeylanicae: Being Contributions to the Zoology of Ceylon. Published by the author, Colombo.
    Kocher, T.D., Thomas, W.K., Meyer, A., Edwards, S.V., Pääbo, S., Villablanca, F.X., et al., 1989. Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 6196–6200. .
    Korkmaz, S., Göksülük, D., Zararsiz, G., 2014. MVN: an R package for assessing multivariate normality. R J 6, 151–162.
    Kotagama, S., Ratnavira, G., 2017. Birds of Sri Lanka: an Illustrated Guide. Field Ornithology Group of Sri Lanka, University of Colombo, Colombo.
    Kotagama, S.W., de Silva, R.I., Wijayasinha, A.S., Abeygunawardane, V., 2006. Avifaunal list of Sri Lanka. In: Bambaradeniya, C.N.B. (Ed.), Fauna of Sri Lanka: Status of Taxonomy, Research and Conservation. The World Conservation Union, Colombo, pp. viii + 308.
    Kruuk, L.E.B., Sheldon, B.C., Merilä, J., 2002. Severe inbreeding depression in collared flycatchers (Ficedula albicollis). Proc. R. Soc. A B 269, 1581–1589. .
    Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Tamura, K., 2016. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1870–1874. .
    Kumar, V., Hallström, B.M., Janke, A., 2013. Coalescent-based genome analyses resolve the early branches of the euarchontoglires. PLoS One 8, e60019. .
    Lanfear, R., Calcott, B., Ho, S.Y.W., Guindon, S., 2012. PartitionFinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 1695–1701. .
    Legge, W.V., 1880. A History of the Birds of Ceylon. Published by the author, London.
    Liu, L., Wu, S., Yu, L., 2015. Coalescent methods for estimating species trees from phylogenomic data. J. Systemat. Evol. 53, 380–390. .
    May, W.L., Johnson, W.D., 1997. A SASR macro for the multivariate extension of the Kruskal-Wallis test including multiple comparisons: randomization and ϰ2 criteria. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 26, 239–250. .
    Mayr, E., 1942. Systematics and the Origin of Species, from the Viewpoint of a Zoologist. Columbia University Press, New York.
    Mayr, E., Vaurie, C., 1948. Evolution in the family Dicruridae (birds). Evolution 2, 238–265. .
    Mayr, E., 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
    Mayr, E., 2001. What Evolution Is. Basic Books, New York.
    McCarthy, E.M., 2006. Handbook of Avian Hybrids of the World. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    McCracken, K.G., Sheldon, F.H., 1997. Avian vocalizations and phylogenetic signal. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 3833–3836. .
    Merrill, R.M., Chia, A., Nadeau, N.J., 2014. Divergent warning patterns contribute to assortative mating between incipient Heliconius species. Ecol. Evol. 4, 911–917. .
    MoMDE, 2019. Biodiversity Profile – Sri Lanka, Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Biodiversity Secretariat. Ministry of Mahaweli Development and Environment, Sri Lanka.
    Moyle, R.G., Filardi, C.E., Smith, C.E., Diamond, J., 2009. Explosive Pleistocene diversification and hemispheric expansion of a "great speciator". P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 1863–1868. .
    Nosil, P., Schluter, D., 2011. The genes underlying the process of speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 160–167. .
    Nottebohm, F., 1972. The origins of vocal learning. Am. Nat. 106, 116–140. .
    Nowicki, S., Searcy, W.A., 2014. The evolution of vocal learning. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 28, 48–53. .
    Pasquet, E., Pons, J.M., Fuchs, J., Cruaud, C., Bretagnolle, V., 2007. Evolutionary history and biogeography of the drongos (Dicruridae), a tropical Old World clade of corvoid passerines. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 45, 158–167. .
    Phillips, W.W.A., 1975. A 1975 Annotated Checklist of the Bbirds of Ceylon (Sri Lanka). Wildlife and Nature Protection Society of Ceylon, Sri Lanka.
    Podos, J., 2001. Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin's finches. Nature 409, 185–188. .
    Price, T., 1998. Sexual selection and natural selection in bird speciation. Phil. T. Roy. Soc. B 353, 251–260. .
    Price, T., 2008. Speciation in Birds. Roberts and Co, Greenwood Village.
    Puri, M.L., Sen, P.K., 1969. A class of rank order tests for a general linear hypothesis. Ann. Math. Stat. 40, 1325–1343.
    R Core Team, 2021. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. .
    Rambaut, A., Drummond, A.J., Xie, D., Baele, G., Suchard, M.A., 2018. Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using tracer 1.7. Syst. Biol. 67, 901–904. .
    Ramesh, T., Chakravarthi, J.P.P., Balachandran, S., Kalle, R., 2012. CEPF western Ghats special series: birds of lower Palni Hills, Western Ghats, Tamil Nadu. J. Threat. Taxa 4, 3269–3283. .
    Rasmussen, P.C., Anderton, J.C., 2005. Birds of South Asia: the Ripley Guide. Lynx Editions, Barcelona.
    Rasmussen, P.C., Anderton, J.C., 2012. Birds of South Asia: the Ripley Guide, 2 ed. Lynx Editions, Barcelona.
    Ripley, S.D., 1982. Synopsis of the Birds of India and Pakistan Together with Those of Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, vol. 2. Bombay Natural History Society, India.
    Rocamora, G., Yeatman-Berthelot, D., Bonan, A., 2018. Drongos (Dicruridae). Version 1.0. In: Birds of the World. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca. . (Accessed 10 November 2017).
    Ronquist, F., Teslenko, M., van der Mark, P., Ayres, D.L., Darling, A., Höhna, S., et al., 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61, 539–542. .
    Ryan, P.G., Moloney, C.L., Hudon, J., 1994. Color variation and hybridization among Nesospiza Buntings on inaccessible Island, Tristan da Cunha. Auk 111, 314–327. .
    Seneviratne, S.S., Jones, I.L., Miller, E.H., 2009. Vocal repertoire of auklets (Alcidae, Aethiini): structural organization and phylogenetic significance. Wilson J. Ornithol. 121, 568–584.
    Seneviratne, S.S., Jones, I.L., 2010. Origin and maintenance of mechanosensory ornaments in birds. Anim. Behav. 79, 637–644.
    Seneviratne, S.S., Toews, D.P.L., Brelsford, A., Irwin, D.E., 2012. Concordance of genetic and phenotypic characters across a sapsucker hybrid zone. J. Avian Biol. 43, 119–130. .
    Sharpe, R.B., 1877. Catalogue of the Birds in the British Museum, vol. 3. British Museum, London.
    Sheldon, L.D., Chin, E.H., Gill, S.A., Schmaltz, G., Newman, A.E.M., Soma, K.K., 2008. Effects of blood collection on wild birds: an update. J. Avian Biol. 39, 369–378. .
    Slade, R.W., Moritz, C., Heideman, A., Hale, P.T., 1993. Rapid assessment of single-copy nuclear DNA variation in diverse species. Mol. Ecol. 2, 359–373. .
    Sorenson, M.D., Ast, J.C., Dimcheff, D.E., Yuri, T., Mindell, D.P., 1999. Primers for a PCR-based approach to mitochondrial genome sequencing in birds and other vertebrates. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 12, 105–114. .
    Stamatakis, A., 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313. .
    Sturge, R.J., Omland, K.E., Price, J.J., Lohr, B., 2016. Divergence in calls but not songs in the orchard oriole complex: Icterus spurius and I. fuertesi. J. Avian Biol. 47, 109–120. .
    Sudasinghe, H., Pethiyagoda, R., Meegaskumbura, M., 2020. Evolution of Sri Lanka's giant danios (Teleostei: Cyprinidae: devario): Teasing apart species in a recent diversification. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 149, 106853. .
    Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Higgins, D.G., 2003. Multiple sequence alignment using ClustalW and ClustalX. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2. , 2.3.1-2.3.2.
    Thomson, J., Walton, A., 1972. Redetermination of chronology of Aldabra atoll by 230Th/234U dating. Nature 240, 145–146. .
    Tobias, J.A., Seddon, N., Spottiswoode, C.N., Pilgrim, J.D., Fishpool, L.D.C., Collar, N.J., 2010. Quantitative criteria for species delimitation. Ibis 152, 724–746. .
    Tobias, J.A., Donald, P.F., Martin, R.W., Butchart, S.H.M., Collar, N.J., 2021. Performance of a points-based scoring system for assessing species limits in birds. Ornithology 138,. ukab016.
    Vaurie, C., 1949. A revision of the bird family Dicruridae. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 93, 199–342.
    Vieillot, J.P., 1817. Nouveau dictionnaire d'histoire naturelle, appliquée aux arts, à l'agriculture, à l'économie rurale et domestique, à la médecine, etc (Nouv. éd. presqu' entièrement refondue et considérablement angmentée, ed, vol. 9. Chez Deterville, Paris.
    Wait, W.E., 1931. Manual of the Birds of Ceylon, 2 ed. Dulau Co. Ltd., London.
    Warakagoda, D., 2000. Observation of a Ceylon crested drongo with a "racket tail". CBC notes.
    Warakagoda, D., Inskipp, C., Inskipp, T., Grimmett, R., 2012. Birds of Sri Lanka. Bloomsbury Natural History, Camden.
    Weerakkody, S., Qin, L., Seneviratne, S.S., Goodale, E., 2020. The Vocal Divergence of Racket-Tailed Drongo (Dicrurus Paradiseus) Allospecies Cluster in Sri Lanka: Testing Species Recognition and Vocal Characteristics Using Acoustic Analysis and Playback Experiments. WILDLANKA, Sri Lanka.
    Weerakkody, S., Qin, L., Seneviratne, S.S., Goodale, E., 2022. Species Status of the Enigmatic Sri Lanka Drongo: the Use of Genetic, Morphometric and Acoustic Traits in Species Delimitation. 28th IOCongress, Durban.
    Whistler, H., 1944. The avifaunal survey of Ceylon. Spolia Zeylan. 23, 169–170.
    Wickramasinghe, N., Robin, V.V., Ramakrishnan, U., Reddy, S., Seneviratne, S.S., 2017. Non-sister Sri Lankan white-eyes (genus Zosterops) are a result of independent colonizations. PLoS One 12, e0181441. .
    Xi, Z., Liu, L., Rest, J.S., Davis, C.C., 2014. Coalescent versus concatenation methods and the placement of amborella as sister to water lilies. Syst. Biol. 63, 919–932. .
  • Related Articles

Catalog

    Figures(5)  /  Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (4) PDF downloads (2) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return