Rustam Pshegusov, Victoria Chadaeva. 2023: Modelling the nesting-habitat of threatened vulture species in the caucasus: An ecosystem approach to formalising environmental factors in species distribution models. Avian Research, 14(1): 100131. DOI: 10.1016/j.avrs.2023.100131
Citation: Rustam Pshegusov, Victoria Chadaeva. 2023: Modelling the nesting-habitat of threatened vulture species in the caucasus: An ecosystem approach to formalising environmental factors in species distribution models. Avian Research, 14(1): 100131. DOI: 10.1016/j.avrs.2023.100131

Modelling the nesting-habitat of threatened vulture species in the caucasus: An ecosystem approach to formalising environmental factors in species distribution models

Funds: The study was conducted within the framework of the State Assignment, project 075-00347-19-00 (Patterns of the spatiotemporal dynamics of meadow and forest ecosystems in mountainous areas (Russian Western and Central Caucasus)) and WWF's ‘Save the Forest–Home of Raptors’ project (2020–2022)
More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    E-mail address: p_rustem@inbox.ru (R. Pshegusov)

  • Received Date: 30 Mar 2023
  • Rev Recd Date: 18 Jun 2023
  • Accepted Date: 03 Aug 2023
  • Available Online: 10 Jan 2024
  • Publish Date: 27 Aug 2023
  • Abiotic factors play an important role in species localisation, but biotic and anthropogenic predictors must also be considered in distribution modelling for models to be biologically meaningful. In this study, we formalised the biotic predictors of nesting sites for four threatened Caucasian vultures by including species distribution models (wild ungulates, nesting tree species) as biotic layers in the vulture Maxent models. Maxent was applied in the R dismo package and the best set of the model parameters were defined in the R ENMeval package. Performance metrics were continuous Boyce index, Akaike's information criterion, the area under receiver operating curve and true skill statistics. We also calculated and evaluated the null models. Kernel density estimation method was applied to assess the overlap of vulture ecological niches in the environmental space. The accessibility of anthropogenic food resources was estimated using the Path Distance measure that considers elevation gradient. The availability of pine forests (Scots Pine) and wild ungulates (Alpine Chamois and Caucasian Goat) contributed the most (29.6% and 34.3%) to Cinereous Vulture (Aegypius monachus) nesting site model. Wild ungulate distribution also contributed significantly (about 46%) to the Bearded Vulture (Gypaetus barbatus) model. This scavenger nests in the highlands of the Caucasus at a minimum distance of 5–10 ​km from anthropogenic facilities. In contrast, livestock as a food source was most important in colony distribution of Griffon Vulture (Gyps fulvus). The contribution of distances to settlements and agricultural facilities to the model was 45%. The optimal distance from Egyptian Vulture (Neophron percnopterus) nesting sites to settlements was only 3–10 ​km, to livestock facilities no more than 15 ​km with the factor contribution of about 57%. Excluding the wild ungulate availability, the ecological niches of studied vultures overlapped significantly. Despite similar foraging and nesting requirements, Caucasian vultures are not pronounced nesting and trophic competitors due to the abundance of nesting sites, anthropogenic food sources and successful niche sharing.

  • Avian interspecific brood parasitism, the laying of eggs in the nest of other species to evade subsequent parental care duties, represents an important threat to host breeding success (Davies, 2000). Brood parasites can reduce the reproductive output of the host in several ways. The nestlings of the Common Cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) and other 'evicting' brood parasites cause complete host reproductive failure as their young usually eliminate all host progeny by evicting or directly killing them (Honza et al., 2007; Spottiswoode and Koorevaar, 2012). Parasitic females also destroy nests unsuitable for parasitism to force hosts to renest, thereby increasing the chances of future parasitism (Zahavi, 1979; Soler et al., 2017). In addition to these direct reproductive costs, brood parasitism can lead to other indirect costs for the host. Prolonged care for the parasitic chick and increased number of replacement nests, for example, may reduce host survival and future reproduction (Koleček et al., 2015). Thus, brood parasitism can, in some cases, be even more costly for host individual fitness than nest predation (Rothstein, 1990; Payne, 2005).

    Given that the productivity, the rate at which animals produce their offspring, is a key demographic measure of population growth, reduced productivity due to brood parasitism may also have important population level consequences for host species. These effects on host populations vary depending on the parasite species and the host. Generalist brood parasites, like the cowbirds, may dramatically reduce the growth rates of heavily parasitized host populations and lead to their significant declines (Smith et al., 2002; Kosciuch and Sandercock, 2008), whereas host-specific brood parasites, such as cuckoos, are supposed to have only little population level effects on host species as they occur at low densities, i.e., being much less abundant than their hosts (Payne, 1977; May and Robinson, 1985). However, when the parasitism rate by the Common Cuckoo is extraordinarily high for a long time (64%–66%; Moskát and Honza, 2002), such a host population is usually maintained by immigrants from other, less parasitized or unparasitized populations (Barabás et al., 2004; Krüger, 2007). So, the question is how does brood parasitism affect local, more or less isolated populations of hosts with varying intensity of defence against parasitism? However, while most studies of the Common Cuckoo parasitism have to date focused primarily on specific host anti-parasite behaviours and parasite counter-adaptations, i.e., coevolutionary arms-race between parasites and hosts, the extent to which the Common Cuckoo threatens individual host populations is poorly understood.

    The objective of this study was to determine the effect of Common Cuckoo parasitism on the annual productivity, i.e., number of fledglings produced per female within a nesting season, of a regularly parasitized host population. To assess this issue, a local population of one of the major cuckoo hosts in Europe, the Great Reed Warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) (Leisler and Schulze-Hagen, 2011), was monitored for 15 years (2008–2022) in south-western Slovakia, and the factors that might play a role in the annual reproductive success of this host population were evaluated. Specifically, I tested for an effect of year, population size (number of breeding females), laying date, the length of the breeding season, clutch size, polygyny rate, nest failure, successful parasitism rates (i.e., when cuckoo chick successfully evicted host eggs or chicks), local spring temperature and spring total precipitation. I predicted lower annual productivity of the study population in years with higher rates of successful parasitism. Since nest predation is one of the most important factors influencing reproductive success in birds (Ricklefs, 1969; Martin, 1993), I also expected reduced annual productivity with increased nest failure rates due to nest predation and other causes such as nest destruction and nest abandonment.

    The study was carried out in a fishpond system near Štúrovo, southwestern Slovakia (47°51′ N, 18°36′ E, 114–116 m a.s.l.) with a total area of 45 ha. The ponds were surrounded by narrow belts of reed beds (maximum width 2–10 m) and scattered willows used by female cuckoos as vantage points for watching potential hosts and locating their nests. Due to intensive pond management, the littoral vegetation was maintained at the similar extent throughout the study period. The most frequent predators of reed passerine nests in the study area were the Little Bittern (Ixobrychus minutus) and the Marsh Harrier (Circus aeruginosus).

    The Great Reed Warbler is a medium size (31 g) open-nesting passerine breeding throughout mainland Europe and the West Palearctic (Cramp, 1992). Birds arrive on their breeding grounds in mid-April – early-May and start laying eggs in May, continuing until late July. In central Europe, the Great Reed Warblers breed usually once per year, two broods in one season are very scarce (Trnka and Samaš, 2024), and on average lay clutches of five eggs. Only the female builds the nest and incubates the clutch, however, both the female and male feed and defend the young (Požgayová et al., 2009; Trnka and Grim, 2013). The Great Reed Warbler has a polygynous mating system, with polygynous males providing significantly less parental care to their offspring than monogamous males (Sejberg et al., 2000; Požgayová et al., 2015). The rates of social polygyny range between 8% and 56% (Catchpole et al., 1985; Hasselquist, 1998; Leisler and Wink, 2000). The nests of the Great Reed Warbler suffer relatively high rates of predation and Common Cuckoo parasitism. Rates of parasitism (the percentage of nests in which cuckoo eggs were laid) in European Great Reed Warbler populations range from 0 to 68 % (Moskát et al., 2008; Trnka et al., 2012). There is also known intraspecific nest predation in this species, where lower-ranking females destroy eggs of higher-ranking females to gain increased paternal investment (Trnka et al., 2010).

    In the study area, the Great Reed Warbler is the predominant reed-nesting passerine species. Its population comprised 18–56 breeding females during the study period. For specific breeding parameters of the studied population, see Trnka and Samaš (2024).

    The fieldwork was conducted in 2008–2022. All birds in the study population were individually marked with one aluminium ring and a unique combination of two or three coloured plastic rings (adults). Great Reed Warbler nests were searched systematically at 4–5 day intervals between May and late July and then checked at 1–2 day intervals where possible to determine the day of clutch completion, the final clutch size and to detect the presence of a cuckoo egg (see also Trnka et al., 2012). As almost all nests were found during nest building or egg-laying, the onset of laying was assessed directly, and only in some cases it was recalculated according to the date of hatching. The brood size and number of fledglings were recorded when the young were 10–12 days old. The social mating status of each male and female was determined based on their captures at or near the nests or on direct observations of colour-ringed birds defending their nests or feeding their young. The rate of polygyny was calculated as the percentage of males mated with two or more females, i.e., number of polygynous males divided by the total number of males in the population. The length of the breeding period was defined as the time between the first egg laid and the last young fledged or last nest failure (see also Trnka and Samaš, 2024). The annual rates of successful cuckoo parasitism were calculated as the number of nests in which cuckoo chick successfully hatched and evicted host eggs or chicks/total number of nests where cuckoo eggs were laid. Analogically, the nest failure rate was calculated as the proportion of nests that failed due to predation, abandonment, destruction (e.g., by wind), flooding, etc. A nest was considered predated if eggs or nestlings disappeared or only eggshells were found in the nest cup. Because of the uncertainty in determining the causes of egg losses in some clutches (see Discussion for details), cases of partial clutch predation were not included in the analyses. Abandoned nests were nests with incomplete or complete clutches with cold eggs that were seen without attending breeders after two consecutive inspections. In the case of nests destroyed by wind or larger animals (e.g., swans, herons, wild boars), the reeds with the nest as well as neighbouring reeds were bent or broken, and the nest itself was often squeezed, leaving at least some nest contents (eggs or dead young) in or under the nest. Flooded nests were nests covered by surface water after heavy rainfall and increased water level in ponds. Annual productivity was calculated as the mean number of fledglings produced per breeding female throughout the breeding season. The meteorological data were obtained from the national climate station (the city Hurbanovo) located 28 km west of the study site.

    All statistical analyses were conducted in R v. 4.3.2 (R Core Team, 2023). We used a general linear model with normal distribution and identity link to test the effects of breeding and environmental variables on annual productivity. Continuous predictors included year, total number of breeding females as a proxy of population size, median of first egg laid in breeding season (1 = 1st May), length of breeding season (in days), average clutch size, annual nest failure rate, annual successful parasitism rate, average temperature (℃) from April to June, and total precipitation (mm) from April to June. We standardized all predictors to have a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1 because the covariates were on different scales. This also improved the interpretability of the intercept and model overall, ensuring that the coefficients reflect the standardized effect of each predictor.

    We presented the outputs of the full and final models. The final model was the one with the lowest AICc and was selected using function dredge in the package MuMIn v. 1.47.5 (Bartoń, 2023). Potential collinearity among the covariates was low, and variance inflation factors were < 2 in all cases (Zuur et al., 2010). We performed model residual diagnostics with R package RVAideMemoire v. 0.9-83-7 (Herve, 2023) and did not detect any violation of model assumptions.

    A total of 495 breeding pairs (females) of Great Reed Warblers successfully reared 1321 of their own young and 63 young of the Common Cuckoo in the study population over the course of 15 years. Annual productivity of birds ranged from 1.7 to 4.3 (Fig. 1) and was primarily and negatively affected by the successful Common Cuckoo parasitism (Table 1, Fig. 2A). A 21% increase in parasitism rate reduced annual productivity by approximately one host chick. Likewise, annual productivity was negatively affected by nest failure rate, where a 23% increase in nest failure rate resulted in a reduction in annual productivity for one host chick (Table 1, Fig. 2B). A less pronounced but significant effect was also found for the number of breeding females, where a reduction in annual productivity of approximately one chick was associated with an increase in population size of 40 breeding females. Other environmental and breeding parameters had no effect on the annual productivity of Great Reed Warbler females in the study population. Similarly, successfully parasitized nests with a young cuckoo were predated to approximately the same extent as non-parasitized nests with host nestlings regardless of their age (19.1% vs. 21%, respectively, χ2 = 0.65, df = 1, p = 0.29).

    Figure  1.  Annual productivity (number of fledglings per female per year) over the 2008–2022 period. Numbers at the top of the bars indicate population size (total number of breeding females).
    Table  1.  Output of full and final general linear models with normal distribution testing effect of breeding and environmental variables on the annual productivity in the Great Reed Warbler. Final model was selected according to the lowest AICc.
    Model Parameter Estimate ± S.E. t value P value
    Full Intercept 2.89±0.05 54.35 < 0.001
    Year −0.04±0.08 −0.55 0.61
    First egg laid −0.09±0.19 −0.48 0.65
    Number of breeding females −0.19±0.08 −2.43 0.07
    Clutch size −0.09±0.18 −0.51 0.64
    Season length −0.10±0.09 −1.05 0.36
    Polygyny rate 0.00±0.12 0.02 0.99
    Nest failure rate −0.27±0.06 −4.32 0.01
    Parasitism rate −0.50±0.08 −6.54 0.003
    Temperature 0.02±0.07 0.33 0.76
    Rainfall 0.04±0.08 0.53 0.62
    Final Intercept 2.89±0.05 59.78 < 0.001
    Number of breeding females −0.20±0.05 −3.89 0.003
    Nest failure rate −0.29±0.05 −5.72 < 0.001
    Parasitism rate −0.55±0.05 −10.57 < 0.001
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure  2.  Effect of (A) parasitism rate, (B) nest failure rate and (C) total number of breeding females on the annual productivity in the Great Reed Warbler.

    Contrary to the general assumption that host-specific brood parasites have only little impact on the productivity of their hosts at the population level because of the small proportion of parasitized nests (Payne, 1977; May and Robinson, 1985), the results of this study showed, for the first time to my knowledge, a significant negative effect of Common Cuckoo parasitism on the annual productivity of a local Great Reed Warbler population. More importantly, successful nest parasitism contributed to a reduction in Great Reed Warbler annual productivity at about the same rate as overall nest failure caused by predation, nest destruction, or nest abandonment. This is not so surprising given that the annual rate of successful parasitism of the Common Cuckoo was as high as 18%–44% in some years in the population studied (this study), and female Great Reed Warblers rarely reared their own chicks after the successful fledging of a Common Cuckoo chick from their first nest in the same season (Trnka and Samaš, 2024).

    In addition, lower annual productivity may also be caused by partial or complete predation of host eggs by the Common Cuckoo. According to "mafia" scenario (Zahavi, 1979), these cuckoo predators may probably be females which did not parasitize particular nests (Jelínek et al., 2016). Moreover, Common Cuckoo females usually remove one or two host eggs at laying which they subsequently eat (Davies, 2000) and some or all of host eggs may even be thrown or destroyed by the hosts during the ejection of a cuckoo egg. Such cases of cuckoo predation and host egg losses also contribute to reduced annual host productivity caused directly or indirectly by cuckoo parasitism, thereby strengthening obtained findings. However, without direct observation it is difficult to determine the true reason of the loss of host eggs. In the study population, Great Reed Warblers rejected the parasitic egg in 53.9%–65.7%, most frequently by ejection (42.9%), and less by desertion (22.8%) (Trnka et al., 2012, 2023), and the rate of nest predation on the Great Reed Warbler nests by predators other than the Common Cuckoo averaged about 20% (Trnka and Prokop, 2010). Thus, nest parasitism and nest predation are interconnected and may skew the true impact of nest parasitism on the annual productivity of a host population. Therefore, additional studies focusing specifically on the impact of predation by the Common Cuckoo on the annual productivity of a host population will be very valuable.

    However, the fact that brood parasites can limit or regulate population size in hosts has been clearly demonstrated for hosts of the cowbirds (Molothrus spp.) in North America. There have even been implemented cowbird removal programs as an effective management strategy to restore host populations (Clotfelter and Yasukawa, 1999; Kostecke et al., 2005; Ladin et al., 2016).

    Nevertheless, despite a relatively high rate of successful parasitism and its negative impact on the annual productivity of the local Great Reed Warbler population, the studied population has been successfully surviving for more than three decades (own data). One reason for this may be the immigration of individuals from another neighbouring populations (see also Barabás et al., 2004). This is partly supported by the relatively high proportion of new unringed individuals in the study population, as evident from the low annual return rate of breeding females, which ranged from only 23%–29.3% (Trnka and Samaš, 2024), and by several recoveries of Great Reed Warbler adults from adjacent breeding sites (unpublished data). These findings suggest that local population dynamics of hosts may be influenced by spatial variation in patch quality where brood parasites may create differences in reproductive success among host populations. According to this model of source-sink dynamics individuals from populations of high-quality habitat, i.e., the source, maintain populations of low-quality habitat, the sink (Yang et al., 2014).

    Another possible explanation is that annual productivity of fledglings in the Great Reed Warbler is a subject of density-dependent selection for lower reproductive output at high abundance (Travis et al., 2023), which is also indicated by the results obtained. Such a negative relationship between the increased number of breeding females and annual productivity has been found in several other bird species (Sæther et al., 2021; Monnier-Corbel et al., 2022).

    In summary, brood parasitism by the Common Cuckoo significantly reduced the annual productivity of the local Great Reed Warbler population, which was likely maintained by immigrants from other populations and density-dependent selection. Thus, the level of population isolation and the interactions of density-dependent factors such as nest parasitism and nest predation can affect the demography of host populations of the Common Cuckoo. However, further long-term studies assessing the consequences of Common Cuckoo parasitism on host population dynamics are needed to clarify this issue.

    The study was carried out in accordance with Slovak law. Licences and permits for handling and ringing of birds were issued by the Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic.

    Alfréd Trnka: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Validation, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization.

    The author declare that he has no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    I thank to all the people who helped me in the field. Peter Samaš did the statistical analyses and read an earlier version of the manuscript. I am also grateful to two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on the manuscript.

  • Abuladze, A., Kandaurov, A., Bukhnikashvili, A., Natradze, I., Kokhia, M., Bekoshvili, D., et al., 2011. The analysis of recorded causes of death of adult birds of prey and owls in Georgia in 1973–2011. In: Abuladze, A. (Ed.), The Birds of Prey and Owls of Caucasus. Institute of Zoology of the Ilia State University, Tbilisi, pp. 5–7.
    Adhikari, D., Singh, P., Tiwary, R., Barik, S., Barik, K., 2019. Modelling the environmental niche and potential distribution of Magnolia campbellii Hook. f. & Thomson for its conservation in the Indian Eastern Himalaya. In: Bikarma, S. (Ed.), Plants of Commercial Values. New India Publishing Agency, New Delhi, pp. 79–88.
    Aghababyan, K., Ananyan, V., 2011. Assessment of the conservation status of Egyptian Vulture (Neophron percnopterus) in Armenia. In: Abuladze, A. (Ed.), The Birds of Prey and Owls of Caucasus. Institute of Zoology of the Ilia State University, Tbilisi, p. 7.
    Akaike, H., 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 19, 716–723.
    Akbayev, I.M., Tkachenko, I.V., 2001. On nesting parasitism among birds of prey. In: Kurochkin, E.N., Rakhimov, I.I. (Eds.), Current Issues in the Study and Conservation of Birds in Eastern Europe and North Asia. Matbugat Yorta Publishing House, Kazan, p. 30.
    Allouche, O., Tsoar, A., Kadmon, R., 2006. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (tss). J. Appl. Ecol. 6, 1223–1232. .
    Amatulli, G., Domisch, S., Tuanmu, M.-N., Parmentier, B., Ranipeta, A., Malczyk, J., et al., 2018. A suite of global, cross-scale topographic variables for environmental and biodiversity modeling. Sci. Data 5, 180040. .
    Aresu, M., Pennino, M., de Rosa, D., Rotta, A., Berlinguer, F., 2021. Modelling the effect of environmental variables on the reproductive success of Griffon Vulture (Gyps fulvus) in Sardinia, Italy. Ibis 164, 255–266. .
    Arkumarev, V., Dobrev, D., Stamenov, A., Angelova, V., Delchev, A., Dyulgerska, V., et al., 2020. Occurrences of the cinereous vulture (Aegypius monachus) in the eastern rhodopes, Bulgaria. Ecol. Balk. 12, 53–63.
    Arslan, Ş., Kirazlı, C., 2022. Turkey's largest Cinereous vulture population in a recently discovered breeding area in North-West Anatolia. Turk. J. Zool. 46, 144–152. .
    Baldwin, R.A., 2009. Use of maximum entropy modeling in wildlife research. Entropy 11, 854–866.
    Belik, V.P., 2004. Aegypius monachus in the North Caucasus. Strepet 2, 68–76.
    Belik, V.P., 2012. Distribution and number of the Black Vulture (Aegyptus monachus, Falconiformes) in the Northern Caucasus. Russ. J. Zool. 91, 347–354.
    Belik, V.P., 2014. Raptor population dynamics in the North Caucasus: the results of 150 years of research. In: Belik, V.P. (Ed.), Birds of Prey in the North Caucasus and Adjacent Regions: Distribution, Ecology, Population Dynamics, Conservation. Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, pp. 83–126.
    Belik, V.P., Vetrov, V.V., Milobog, Y.V., 2011. Birds of prey of Dagestan from 2009 expedition research. In: Abuladze, A. (Ed.), The Birds of Prey and Owls of Caucasus. Institute of Zoology of the Ilia State University, Tbilisi, pp. 10–13.
    Belik, V.P., Nasrulaev, N.I., 2019. To the avifauna of Inner Dagestan arid hollows: Orot basin on the Avarskoe Koisu river. In: Belik, V.P. (Ed.), Sustainable Development of Protected Areas. Natural Ornithological Park in the Imereti Lowlands, Sochi, pp. 63–81.
    Belik, V.P., Nasrulaev, N.I., 2021. New species in the avifauna of the Botlikh depression (Inner Dagestan). Russ. Ornithol. J. 30, 3527–3555.
    Belik, V.P., Telpov, V.A., Komarov, Y.E., Pshegusov, R.H., 2019. Gyps fulvus in the central Caucasus. Russ. Ornithol. J. 28, 2535–2539.
    Bertran, J., Margalida, A., 2002. Territorial behavior of bearded vultures in response to griffon vultures. J. Field Ornithol. 73, 86–90. .
    BirdLife International, 2022. . (Accessed 12 October 2022).
    Blonder, B., Lamanna, C., Violle, C., Enquist, B.J., 2014. The n-dimensional hypervolume. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 23, 595–609. .
    Bohl, C.L., Kass, J.M., Anderson, R.P., 2019. A new null model approach to quantify performance and significance for ecological niche models of species distributions. J. Biogeogr. 46, 1101–1111. .
    Boyce, M.S., Vernier, P.R., Nielsen, S.E., Schmiegelow, F.K.A., 2002. Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecol. Model. 157, 281–300.
    Brink, C., Krueger, S., Amar, A., 2020. Potential release sites and strategies for a Bearded Vulture Gypaetus barbatus reintroduction in South Africa. Ostrich 91, 2. .
    Buhl-Mortensen, L., Burgos, J., Steingrund, P., Buhl-Mortensen, P., Olafsdottir, S., Ragnarsson, S., 2019. Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems (VMEs): Coral and Sponge VMEs in Arctic and Sub-arctic Waters – Distribution and Threats. Nordisk Ministerråd, Copenhagen. .
    Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R., 2002. Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, second ed. Springer-Verlag, New York.
    Costillo Borrego, E., Corbacho Amado, C., Morán-López, R., 2011. Diet plasticity of Cinereous Vulture Aegypius monachus in different colonies in the extremadura (SW Spain). Ardea 95, 201–211. .
    Daget, P., Ahdali, L., David, P., 1988. Mediterranean bioclimate and its variation in the Palaearctic region. In: Specht, R.L. (Ed.), Mediterranean-Type Ecosystems, A Data Source Book. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 139–148.
    Donázar, J., Cortés-Avizanda, A., Carrete, M., 2010. Dietary shifts in two vultures after the demise of supplementary feeding stations: consequences of the EU sanitary legislation. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 56, 613–621. .
    Edisherashvili, G., 2011. Birds of prey and owls of the Shida Kartli region, Georgia. In: Abuladze, A. (Ed.), The Birds of Prey and Owls of Caucasus. Institute of Zoology of the Ilia State University, Tbilisi, pp. 16–18.
    Elith, J., Graham, C.H., Anderson, R.P., Dudik, M., 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29, 129–151. .
    Elith, J., Phillips, S.J., Hastie, T., Dudík, M., Chee, Y.E., Yates, C.J., 2011. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers. Distrib. 17, 43–57.
    ENVIREM, 2022. ENVIronmental Rasters for ecological modeling. . (Accessed 10 December 2022).
    Farashi, A., Alizadeh-Noughani, M., 2018. Niche modelling of the potential distribution of the Egyptian Vulture Neophron percnopterus during summer and winter in Iran, to identify gaps in protected area coverage. Bird. Conserv. Int. 29, 423–436. .
    Ferrier, S., Watson, G., Pearce, J., Drielsma, M.J., 2002. Extended statistical approaches tomodelling spatial pattern in biodiversity in northeast NewSouth Wales. I. Specieslevel modelling. Biodivers. Conserv. 11, 2275–2307. .
    Fielding, A.H., Bell, J.F., 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ. Conserv. 24, 38–49. .
    García-Ripollés, C., López-López, P., García-López, F., Aguilar, J.M., Verdejo, J., 2005. Modelling nesting habitat preferences of eurasian griffon vulture Gyps fulvus in eastern iberian Peninsula. ARDEOLA 52, 287–304.
    Gavashelishvili, A., 2012. Movements and habitat use by immature cinereous vultures (Aegypius monachus) from the Caucasus. Hous. Theor. Soc. 59, 449–461. .
    Gavashelishvili, A., Mcgrady, M., 2006. Geographic information system-based modelling of vulture response to carcass appearance in the Caucasus. J. Zool. 269, 365–372. .
    Gavashelishvili, A., McGrady, M., Javakhishvili, Z., 2006. Planning the conservation of the breeding population of cinereous vultures Aegypius monachus in the Republic of Georgia. Oryx 40, 76–83. .
    GBIF, 2022. Global biodiversity information facility. . (Accessed 15 December 2022).
    Glover-Kapfer, P., 2015. A Training Manual for Habitat Suitability and Connectivity Modeling Using Tigers (Panthera tigris) in Bhutan as Example. WWF, Bhutan. . Technical Report.
    Guerrero-Casado, J., Arenas González, R., Tortosa, F., 2013. Modelling the nesting-habitat of the Cinereous Vulture Aegypius monachus on a fine scale for conservation purposes. Hous. Theor. Soc. 60, 533–538. .
    Guisan, A., Thuiller, W., Zimmermann, N., 2017. Habitat Suitability and Distribution Models: with Applications in R. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. .
    Hijmans, R.J., Phillips, S.J., Leathwick, J., Elith, J., 2017. Dismo: species distribution modeling. R package version 1.3-3. .(Accessed 10 December 2022).
    Ilyukh, M.P., 2017. Gyps fulvus and Aegypius monachus in stavropol. Russ. Ornithol. J. 26, 3–9.
    Ilyukh, M.P., Shevtsov, A.S., 2021. Gyps fulvus – a new nesting species in Stavropol Krai. Russ. Ornithol. J. 30, 3113–3118.
    Iverson, L.R., Rebbeck, J., Peters, M.P., Hutchinson, T., Fox, T., 2019. Predicting Ailanthus altissima presence across a managed forest landscape in southeast Ohio. For. Ecosyst. 6, 41. .
    Jha, K., Jha, R., Campbell, M., 2021. The distribution, nesting habits and status of threatened vulture species in protected areas of Central India. Ecol. Quest. 3, 7–22. .
    Jha, R., Kanaujia, A., Jha, K., 2022. Wintering habitat modelling for conservation of Eurasian vultures in northern India. Nova Geodesia 2, 2–20. .
    Kass, J.M., Muscarella, R., Galante, P.J., Bohl, C.L., Pinilla-Buitrago, G.E., Boria, R.A., et al., 2021. ENMeval 2.0: redesigned for customizable and reproducible modeling of species' niches and distributions. Methods Ecol. Evol. 12, 1602–1608. .
    Kabir, M., Shamas, U., Ahmad, S., Awan, M.N., 2019. Population surveys of endangered Egyptian vulture (Neophron percnopterus) in Mahasheer National Park Kotli, Azad Jammu and Kashmihmir. Vulture News 77, 55–61. .
    Karavaev, A.A., Potapenko, Y.Y., 2018. Additional information on nesting of Aegypius monachus on the rocky mountain range of the northern Caucasus. Russ. Ornithol. J. 27, 2307–2308.
    Karavaev, A.A., Vitovich, O.A., 2021. Birds of Karachay-Cherkessia: Gypaetus barbatus. Russ. Ornithol. J. 30, 3409–3429.
    Karyakin, I.V., Bekmansurov, R.H., Nikolenko, E.G., Djamirzoev, G.S., 2018. Monitoring results of a nesting group of vultures in the Narat-Tyube Ridge and tracking by GPS/GSM trackers of juvenile vultures from this group (Republic of Dagestan, Russia). Raptor Conserv 36, 108–135.
    Karimov, T., Mammadov, A., 2019. The status of vultures Neophron percnopterus, Gypaetus barbatus, Gyps fulvus, Aegypius monachus (Accipitriformes) in Azerbaijan. Ukrainian J. Ecol. 9, 565–570.
    Kassambara, A., Mundt, F., 2019. Factoextra: extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses. . (Accessed 10 December 2022).
    Khwarahm, N., Ararat, K., Qader, S., Al-Quraishi, A., 2021. Modelling habitat suitability for the breeding Egyptian Vulture (Neophron percnopterus) in the Kurdistan region of Iraq. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Sci. 45, 1519–1530. .
    Kirazlı, C., 2016. The impact of some spatial factors on disturbance and reaction distances on nest occupation by the near threatened Cinereous Vulture (Aegypius monachus). N. West. J. Zool. 12, 304–313.
    Komarov, Y.E., 2017. On the breeding biology of Gypaetus barbatus in the mountains of North Ossetia. Russ. Ornithol. J. 26, 1967–1971.
    Komori, O., Eguchi, S., 2019. β-Maxent. In: Louzada, F., dos Santos Migon, H., Paula, G.A., Cribari-Neto, F. (Eds.), Statistical Methods for Imbalanced Data in Ecological and Biological Studies. Springer Briefs in Statistics, Tokyo. .
    Le, S., Josse, J., Husson, F., 2008. FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis. J. Stat. Software 25, 1–18.
    Lee, M.-Y., Lee, S.-M., Kang, S.-G., Jeon, H., Kim, H.-J., Park, J.-Y., et al., 2021. Phylogenetic relationships and genetic variations among cinereous vultures Aegypius monachus in South Korea. Avian Biol. Res. 15, 175815592110647. .
    Leroy, B., Delsol, R., Hugueny, B., Meynard, C., Barhoumi, C., Barbet-Massin, M., et al., 2018. Without quality presence-absence data, discrimination metrics such as TSS can be misleading measures of model performance. J. Biogeogr. 45, 1994–2002. .
    Lissovsky, A.A., Dudov, S.V., 2020. Advantages and limitations of application of the species distribution modeling methods. 2. Maxent. J. Gen. Biol. 81, 135–146. .
    Margalida, A., 2008. Bearded Vultures (Gypaetus barbatus) prefer fatty bones. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 63, 187–193. .
    Margalida, A., Benítez, J., Sánchez-Zapata, J., Ávila, E., Arenas González, R., Donázar, J., 2011. Long-term relationship between diet breadth and breeding success in a declining population of Egyptian Vultures Neophron percnopterus. Ibis 154, 184–188. .
    Mateo-Tomás, P., Olea, P., 2010. Anticipating knowledge to inform species management: predicting spatially explicit habitat suitability of a colonial vulture spreading its range. PLoS One 5, e12374. .
    McCoy, J., Johnston, K., Kopp, S., Borup, B., Willison, J., Payne, B., 2001. Using ArcGIS Spatial Analyst. ESRI Press, Redlands.
    Mishra, S., Kumar, D., Kanaujia, A., 2018. A preliminary study on nest site selection by Egyptian Vultures in Uttar Pradesh, India. Biol. Forum Int. J. 10, 90–95.
    Mishra, S., Kumar, D., Sinha, D., Kanaujia, A., 2021. Competitive interactions within and between species in scavenger avian species: a case study of Egyptian Vulture in Uttar Pradesh, India. In: Recent Trends in Environment, Climate Change, Physical and Life Sciences, pp. 99–102.
    Mnatsekanov, R.A., 2022. Aegypius monachus in north Ossetia. Russ. Ornithol. J. 31, 2417–2433.
    Mnatsekanov, R.A., Tilba, P.A., 1998. Current status of scavenger foraging in the Western Caucasus. In: III Conference on Birds of Prey in Eastern Europe and North Asia. SGU, Stavropol, pp. 83–84.
    Morán-López, R., Guzman, J., Costillo Borrego, E., Villegas, A., 2005. Nest-site selection of endangered cinereous vulture (Aegypius monachus) populations affected by anthropogenic disturbance: present and future conservation implications. Anim. Conserv. 9, 29–37. .
    Moreno-Opo, R., Fernández-Olalla, M., Margalida, A., Arredondo, Á., Guil, F., 2012. Effect of methodological and ecological approaches on heterogeneity of nest-site selection of a long-lived vulture. PLoS One 7, e33469. .
    Muscarella, R., Galante, P.J., Soley-Guardia, M., Boria, R.A., Kass, J.M., Uriarte, M., et al., 2014. ENMeval: an R package for conducting spatially independent evaluations and estimating optimal model complexity for MaxEnt ecological niche models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 1198–1205.
    NextGis, 2022. Vector layers and ready-to-go GIS projects based on OSM in ESRI Shape, Geodatabase. . (Accessed 15 December 2022).
    Ortiz-Urbina, E., Diaz-Balteiro, L., Iglesias Merchan, C., 2020. Influence of anthropogenic noise for predicting cinereous vulture nest distribution. Sustainability 12, 503. .
    Osorio-Olvera, L., Lira-Noriega, A., Soberón, J., Peterson, A., Falconi, M., Contreras-Díaz, R.G., et al., 2020. ntbox: an R package with graphical user interface for modelling and evaluating multidimensional ecological niches. Methods Ecol. Evol. 11, 1199–1206. .
    PanoplyWin, 2021. . (Accessed 26 December 2022).
    Parfenov, E.A., 2019. Nesting of Gyps fulvus in the vicinity of Pyatigorsk. Russ. Ornithol. J. 28, 5054–5061.
    Perevozov, A.G., 2020. Aegypius monachus nesting in the Caucasus nature reserve. Russ. Ornithol. J. 29, 4739–4741.
    Peterson, A., Soberón, J., 2012. Species distribution modeling and ecological niche modeling: getting the concepts right. Nat. Conserv. 10, 1–6. .
    Phillips, S.J., Anderson, R.P., DudÍk, M., Schapire, R.E., Blair, M.E., 2017. Opening the black box: an open-source release of Maxent. Ecography 40, 887–893. .
    Phillips, S.J., Anderson, R.P., Schapire, R.E., 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 190, 231–259. .
    Phillips, S.J., Dudík, M., 2008. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31, 161–175. .
    Pshegusov, R., Tembotova, F., Chadaeva, V., Sablirova, Y., Mollaeva, M., Akhomgotov, A., 2022. Ecological niche modeling of the main forest-forming species in the Caucasus. For. Ecosyst. 9, 100019. .
    Qin, A., Liu, B., Guo, Q., Bussmann, R.W., Ma, F., Jian, Z., et al., 2017. Maxent modeling for predicting impacts of climate change on the potential distribution of Thuja sutchuenensis Franch., an extremely endangered conifer from southwestern China. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 10, 139–146.
    Raes, N., ter Steege, H., 2007. A null-model for significance testing of presence-only species distribution models. Ecography 30, 727–736. .
    Red Data Book of Russian Federation (Plants and Fungi). 2018. Tovarishchestvo nauchnykh izdaniy KMK, Moscow.
    Riley, S.J., Degloria, S.D., Elliot, S.D., 1999. A Terrain Ruggedness Index that quantifies topographic heterogeneity. Intermt. J. Sci. 5, 23–27.
    Rodríguez, B., Rodríguez, A., Siverio, F., Siverio, M., 2018. Factors affecting the spatial distribution and breeding habitat of an insularcliff-nesting raptor community. Curr. Zool. 64, 173–181. .
    Sandesh, G., Tulsi Ram, S., Rishi, B., Juan Manuel, P.-G., Manshanta, G., Hem Sagar, B., et al., 2022. Breeding habitat and factors affecting the cliff selection by Egyptian Vultures in Central-West Nepal. J. Raptor Res. 57, 81–91. .
    Sutton, L., Anderson, D., Franco, M., McClure, C., Miranda, E., Vargas, F., et al., 2023. Prey resources are equally important as climatic conditions for predicting the distribution of a broad-ranged apex predator. Divers. Distrib. 29, 613–628. .
    Sharma, H., Dhakal, S., Bhusal, K., Dhakal, H., Gautam, R., Joshi, A., et al., 2023. Factors influencing the potential distribution of globally endangered Egyptian Vulture nesting habitat in Nepal. Animals 13, 633. .
    Shevtsov, A.S., Ilyukh, M.P., 2022. Neophron percnopterus nesting in the vicinity of Kislovodsk. Russ. Ornithol. J. 31, 3215–3231.
    Sillero, N., Arenas-Castro, S., Enriquez-Urzela, U., Vale, C.G., Sousa-Guedes, D., MartínezFreiría, F., et al., 2021. Want to model a species niche? A step-by-step guideline on correlative ecological niche modelling. Ecol. Model. 456, 109671. .
    Simões, M.V.P., Peterson, A., 2018. Importance of biotic predictors in estimation of potential invasive areas: the example of the tortoise beetle Eurypedus nigrosignatus. Hispaniola. PeerJ 6, e6052. .
    Soberón, J., Peterson, A., 2005. Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species' distributional areas. Biodivers. Inf. 2, 1–10.
    Stoynov, E., Peshev, H., Stoyanov, G., Ivanov, I., Parvanov, D., Grozdanov, A., 2019. Past and present state of the Cinereous Vulture (Aegypius monachus) and feasibility analysis for its reintroduction in Bulgaria. Ecol. Balk. 2019, 30–43.
    Tauler-Ametller, H., Hernández-Matías, A., Pretus, J.L.L., Real, J., 2017. Landfills determine the distribution of an expanding breeding population of the endangered Egyptian vulture Neophron percnopterus. Ibis 159, 757–768. .
    Tilba, P.A., 2014. Status of populations of rare species of birds of prey in the south-eastern part of the Russian Black Sea coast. In: Belik, V.P. (Ed.), Birds of Prey in the North Caucasus and Adjacent Regions: Distribution, Ecology, Population Dynamics, Conservation. Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, pp. 177–192.
    Title, P.O., Bemmels, J.B., 2018. ENVIREM: an expanded set of bioclimatic and topographic variables increases flexibility and improves performance of ecological niche modeling. Ecography 41. , 291–07.
    Tytar, V., 2021. Associations between habitat quality and body size in the CarpathianPodolian land snail Vestia turgida (Gastropoda, Clausiliidae): species distribution model selection and assessment of performance. Zoodiversity 55, 25–40. .
    van Proosdij, A.S.J., Sosef, M.S.M., Wieringa, J.J., Raes, N., 2016. Minimum required number of specimen records to develop accurate species distribution models. Ecography 39, 542–552. .
    Vignali, S., Lorcher, F., Hegglin, D., Arlettaz, R., Braunisch, V., 2021. Modelling the habitat selection of the bearded vulture to predict areas of potential conflict with wind energy development in the Swiss Alps. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 25, e01405. .
    Wickham, H., 2009. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York.
    Xirouchakis, S., Grivas, C., Andreou, G., Georgopoulou, E., 2021. Home range size, space use and resource selection of griffon vultures in an insular environment. J. Zool. 314, 116–131. .
    Xirouchakis, S.M., Mylonas, M., 2005. Selection of breeding cliffs by Griffon Vultures Gyps fulvus in Crete, Greece. Acta Ornithol. 40, 155–161. .
    Yamac, E., 2007. Roosting tree selection of Cinereous Vulture in breeding season in Turkey. Podoces 2, 30–36.
    Zuberogoitia, I., Zabala, J., Martínez, J.E., González-Oreja, J.A., López-López, P., 2014. Effective conservation measures to mitigate the impact of human disturbances on the endangered Egyptian vulture. Anim. Conserv. 17, 410–418. .
  • Related Articles

Catalog

    Figures(6)  /  Tables(6)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (8) PDF downloads (2) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return