Volume 14 Issue 1
Feb.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
1.   Introduction
2.   Materials and methods
3.   Results
4.   Discussion
Authors' contributions
Ethics statement
Declaration of competing interest
Acknowledgements
Appendix A. Supplementary data
References
Related Articles
Wenjuan Wang, Yafang Wang, Qing Chen, Huifang Ding. 2023: Effects of diet shift on the gut microbiota of the critically endangered Siberian Crane. Avian Research, 14(1): 100108. DOI: 10.1016/j.avrs.2023.100108
Citation: Wenjuan Wang, Yafang Wang, Qing Chen, Huifang Ding. 2023: Effects of diet shift on the gut microbiota of the critically endangered Siberian Crane. Avian Research, 14(1): 100108. DOI: 10.1016/j.avrs.2023.100108
shu

Effects of diet shift on the gut microbiota of the critically endangered Siberian Crane

  • a.

    School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China

  • b.

    Center for East Asian–Australasian Flyway Studies, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China

  • c.

    Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Watershed Ecosystem Change and Biodiversity, Center for Watershed Ecology, Institute of Life Science, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330031, China

  • d.

    Jiangxi Poyang Lake Wetland Conservation and Restoration National Permanent Scientific Research Base, National Ecosystem Research Station of Jiangxi Poyang Lake Wetland, Nanchang, 330031, China

Funds: This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 32160132, 31772480)
More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China. E-mail address: wangwj870120@163.com, wangwj870120@bjfu.edu.cn (W. Wang)

  • Received Date: 28 Jan 2023
  • Rev Recd Date: 16 May 2023
  • Accepted Date: 17 May 2023
  • Available Online: 07 Oct 2023
  • Publish Date: 24 May 2023
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract

  • Wetlands worldwide have suffered from serious degradation and transformation, leading to waterbirds increasingly dependent on agricultural fields for feeding. Although gut microbiota is an essential component of host health, the impacts of agricultural feeding on gut microbial community and pathogen transmission remain poorly understood. To fill this knowledge gap, we used 16S rRNA sequencing to characterize the fecal bacterial community of the Siberian Crane (Grus leucogeranus), a Critically Endangered species, that recently has shifted its foraging from largely Vallisneria tubers in Poyang Lake natural wetlands to crops (i.e., rice seeds and lotus rhizomes) in agricultural fields. We compared the bacterial communities between tuber foraging cranes and crop foraging cranes. Our results indicate that diet shift greatly modified the gut microbiota diversity, composition and function. Crop foraging cranes had higher microbiota diversity than tuber foraging cranes. The alteration in microbiota composition and function were correlated with change in food nutrition. Tuber (i.e., high in fiber) foraging cranes were enriched in Clostridiaceae with fiber digestion ability, and crop (i.e., high in carbohydrate) foraging cranes were enriched in bacterial taxa and functions related to carbohydrate metabolism. The flexibility of gut microbiota might enhance Siberian Cranes' ability to adapt to novel diet and environment. However, many enriched families in crop foraging cranes were pathogenic bacteria, which might increase the susceptibility of cranes to pathogenic infection. Special caution should be taken to agricultural feeding waterbirds in Asia, where the widespread poultry-keeping in over-harvested rice fields might increase the transmission probability of pathogenetic bacteria among wild birds, domestic poultry and humans.

    • FullText(HTML)

  • Scavengers are critical to the flow of matter and energy in ecosystems. Despite being one of the taxa most threatened by human activities (Sebastián-González et al., 2020), scavengers are fundamental to many ecological processes and provide numerous cultural benefits (O'Bryan et al., 2018; García-Jiménez et al., 2022). Protecting avian scavengers is one of the keys to conserving the ecological processes in which they are involved. Moreover, from a biological point of view, scavengers are species of great interest, especially large necrophagous raptors. The morphology of large scavengers allows them to use thermal currents and wind to reduce their energy expenditure while covering large areas of the territory (Ruxton and Houston, 2004). Furthermore, avian scavengers are usually colonial, which makes intra- and inter-specific communication and social hierarchy during carrion exploitation highly relevant, as well as social hierarchy during carrion exploitation (Svanbäck and Bolnick, 2005; Bosè et al., 2012; Moreno-Opo et al., 2020). Therefore, a comprehensive knowledge of large soaring-gliding scavengers is particularly interesting, but also necessary for the development of holistic ecosystem management plans.

    The Cinereous Vulture extends its range from Iberia to Asia, being the largest raptor in Europe (Cramp and Simmons, 1980). In Spain, 43 colonies and 2500 breeding pairs have been estimated (~20% of the individuals worldwide). After a dramatic population decline in this country, the species is now considered ‘Not Threatened’ thanks to the stabilization of its traditional populations and several re-introduction projects (del Moral, 2017). The Iberian population is considered mainly resident based on field observations, but some juveniles seldom migrate to western Africa (Ramírez et al., 2022); by contrast, Cinereous Vulture breeding throughout the Caucasian region and Mongolia often show migratory behaviour (Kim et al., 2007; Gavashelishvili et al., 2012; Yamaç and Bilgin, 2012; Kang et al., 2019). In the last decades, the species has been broadly studied in Iberia regarding poisoning and anthropic impacts (Morán-López et al., 2006; Hernández and Margalida, 2008; Moreno-Opo et al., 2010, 2013; Iglesias-Merchán et al., 2016; Arrondo et al., 2021), breeding ecology (Moreno-Opo et al., 2013), habitat selection (Carrete and Donázar, 2005), feeding habits (Costillo et al., 2007), or movements in relation to protected areas and administrative boundaries (Morales-Reyes et al., 2016; Arrondo et al., 2018). In contrast, some aspects of the spatial ecology of the species in Iberia remain unknown: seasonal patterns, sex and age behavioural differences, natal dispersal, etc. Comprehensive studies based on GPS telemetry, including different colonies, should explore some of these topics.

    One of the most important issues is how season and breeding influence the spatial behaviour of the species. The Cinereous Vulture has a lengthy reproductive period: incubation takes place from February to April, and chick-rearing from May to August (Hiraldo, 1983; Hernández and Margalida, 2008). Both sexes incubate the eggs (usually only one egg), and are involved in the nestlings’ care and feeding (Donázar, 1993; Hiraldo, 1983; Tewes, 1996). It has been proved that the energy expenditure and parental effort shift throughout the breeding season in territorial prey-hunting raptors with sex specialization (i.e., López-López et al., 2021). Similarly, other large scavengers such as the Griffon Vulture (Gyps fulvus) travelled larger distances over bigger areas during spring and summer (Morant et al., 2023). Therefore, the combination of seasonal environmental conditions and breeding constraints may be one of the keys to understand the spatial behaviour of raptors, particularly large scavengers, which are highly dependent on environmental conditions for successful flight (Ruxton and Houston, 2004).

    Another significant aspect of the spatial ecology of the species is the natal dispersal and philopatric patterns, which refer to the location of birds' breeding area relative to their natal nest (Newton, 2010). This issue is fundamental to understanding population dynamics, largely determining species' distribution and potential expansion (Becker and Bradley, 2007). There is great diversity in the philopatric patterns within Iberian raptors. For example, the Red Kite (Milvus milvus) is characterised by high philopatry, so most individuals, after two or three years of juvenile dispersal, return to their origin region, settling a few tens of kilometres from their natal nest (García-Macía et al., 2022b). The case of the Bonelli's Eagle (Aquila fasciata) is the opposite. There is a source-sink system among the different Iberian sub-populations, so sub-adults from one sub-population seldom return to their native region, but they become part of other sub-populations, often hundreds of kilometres away (Cadahía et al., 2009; Hernández-Matías et al., 2010). This allowed some stable sub-populations to act as a source of individuals for other declining sub-populations, which act as a sink. Consequently, patterns of philopatry/natal dispersal are fundamental to understanding the recruitment of new individuals in the different populations, and also the species' potential to colonise new territories. In the case of the Cinereous Vulture, the species have been restricted to some regions in Spain for many decades and several re-introduction projects have been carried out (Del Moral, 2017), so it is fundamental to study the natal dispersal of the species in order to understand sub-population trends and potential for expanding its distribution area.

    In this study, 17 Cinereous Vultures were GPS-tracked in order to study the spatial ecology during the adult phase. Consequently, the objectives of the study were: (1) to calculate some movement-related variables, such as the monthly home range size (95 and 50% fixed kernels) and accumulated distances; (2) to explore seasonal differences, considering three periods (incubation, chick-rearing, and non-breeding), in order to determine the variability of those movement-related variables throughout the annual cycle; and (3) to study philopatric behaviour (or natal dispersal), that is, the distance between the natal nest and the first breeding area of the individuals.

    2.1   Tagging and data selection

    Seventeen adult Cinereous Vultures were GPS-tagged in different regions in Spain from 2002 to 2020. Individuals provided data for 2.5 ​± ​1.7 years (mean ​± ​SD), in the range of 0.5–5 years (Table 1).

    Table  1.  Metadata of the 17 adult Cinereous Vultures (Aegypius monachus) tracked in this study. Tagging age, region, analysed period and transmitter model are shown. A hyphen (−) indicates unavailable information.
    ID Sex Tagging age Region Analysed period (adult phase) Months of tracking Transmitter model
    Bullaque F Chick Center-South 2011–2012 6 Microwave PTT-100 70 g Solar Argos/GPS MTI
    Cabeza F Adult Center 2002–2003 16 Microwave PTT-100 70 g Solar Argos/GPS MTI
    Peña F Adult Center 2010–2013 35 Microwave PTT-100 70 g Solar Argos/GPS MTI
    Aldara F Adult Center 2012–2022 123 Microwave PTT-100 70 g Solar Argos/GPS MTI
    Natura – Adult Center 2019–2022 39 OrniTrack-50 - solar powered GPS-GSM tracker
    Risco F Chick Center 2019–2021 27 Microwave PTT-100 70 g Solar Argos/GPS MTI
    Sierra – Chick West 2018–2019 14 Microwave 45 g GPS-GSM-GPRS
    Teja F Chick West 2015–2019 49 Microwave PTT-100 70 g Solar Argos/GPS MTI
    Granadilla F Adult West 2014–2016 26 Microwave PTT-100 70 g Solar Argos/GPS MTI
    Benedicto – Adult West 2018–2019 16 E-obs Solar 48 g GPS-GSM-GPRS
    Jalama – Adult West 2018–2020 23 E-obs Solar 48 g GPS-GSM-GPRS
    Larguijo – Adult West 2020 6 E-obs Solar 48 g GPS-GSM-GPRS
    Larguijo20_1 – Adult West 2020–2022 26 E-obs Solar 48 g GPS-GSM-GPRS
    Larguijo20_2 – Adult West 2020–2021 12 E-obs Solar 48 g GPS-GSM-GPRS
    Larguijo20_3 – Adult West 2020 7 E-obs Solar 48 g GPS-GSM-GPRS
    Mamen M Chick Northeast 2021–2022 10 E-obs Solar 48 g GPS-GSM-GPRS
    Pip M Chick Northeast 2018–2022 47 Microwave PTT-100 70 g Solar Argos/GPS MTI
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Six vultures were GPS-tagged as nestlings, unable to fly freely, but still able to be caught by hand. Eleven individuals were captured as adults (>5 years old) using a dho-gaza net after been attracted with carrion. All individuals were ringed, weighed and measured, and a blood sample was taken from nine individuals for molecular sexing (Ellegren, 1996). A GPS transmitter was attached to the back of each individual by a back-pack harness tied with Tefflon ribbon (Garcelon, 1985; García et al., 2021). The weight of all transmitters was less than 3% of the birds’ weight, thus complying with the recommended range (Bodey et al., 2018). Different transmitter models were attached to the individuals: Microwave PTT-100 70-g Solar Argos/GPS MTI (Microwave Telemetry Inc., Columbia, Maryland, USA; n ​= ​8), Microwave 45 g GPS-GSM-GPRS (Microwave Telemetry Inc., Columbia, Maryland, USA; n ​= ​1), OrniTrack-50 solar-powered GPS-GSM tracker (Ornitela, Vilnius, Lithuania; n ​= ​1), and E-obs Solar 48 g GPS-GSM-GPRS (E-Obs GMBH, Gruenwald, Germany; n ​= ​7). Biologgers provided GPS fixes every 5 ​min to 2 ​h from dawn to dusk during the entire year. Some transmitters provided locations 24 ​h a day during some periods, but night locations were excluded. Locations were filtered at a homogeneous frequency to avoid bias in subsequent calculations: 2-h frequency to estimate monthly home range sizes (all individuals, n ​= ​17) and 30-min frequency to estimate travelled distances (n ​= ​8). Locations were transformed to UTM coordinates (WGS 84, EPSG: 32630).

    Therefore, both adults and juveniles were tagged, and different data were used according to the topic of the analysis. On the one hand, in order to explore seasonal differences and the influence of the breeding period in the spatial ecology, data were selected since individuals were 5 years old at least (n ​= ​17), the most common age of first breeding in the Cinereous Vulture (Cramp and Simmons, 1980). Successful breeding was not confirmed by field observations in all cases, but only in three individuals. However, the rest of the individuals show similar movement patterns to those of the observed ones (permanence in a constrained area during the incubation months) and thus suggesting breeding behaviour. Therefore, we included all individuals in a general pool. On the other hand, in order to study philopatric behaviour, only the six individuals tagged as nestlings were considered.

    2.2   Calculation of movement-related variables

    Distances travelled, home ranges, core areas and home range fidelity were calculated. Distance travelled was calculated as the Euclidian distance between locations (30-min frequency, n ​= ​8) using the ‘amt’ R library (Signer et al., 2019). Monthly accumulated distance was calculated as the sum of all distances previously calculated during each month. Monthly home range sizes (95% and 50% Kernel Density Estimators, KDE) were estimated to determine the area used by the individual during each month (n ​= ​17), with ‘adeHabitat’ R library (Calenge, 2006). Monthly home range fidelity was calculated as the overlap between the monthly home ranges of each individual, using the function ‘kerneloverlap’ from ‘adehabitatHR’ R library, resulting in a matrix of pairwise comparisons which included the proportion of animal i's home range that is overlapped by animal j's home range (Kernohan et al., 2001). Overlap values range from zero (no overlap) to 1 (complete overlap).

    2.3   Statistical analyses on the influence of season

    To study seasonal differences in the monthly accumulated distance and KDEs, Kruskal–Wallis tests were performed (data were non-normal) between the three periods of the year (incubation, chick-rearing and non-breeding season). Subsequently, Wilcoxon tests for pairwise comparisons were performed to compare between all periods.

    All statistical analyses were performed with R Software v. 4.0.5. A significant level was established at <0.05.

    2.4   Philopatric behaviour

    Six individuals, tagged as nestlings in their wild nest (Table 1), were used to study the philopatric behaviour of the species, that is, where individuals located their first breeding area in relation to the natal nest. Euclidian distance between the natal nest, whose position was known since it was noted in the tagging process, and an estimated position of the new nest established once individuals reached reproductive age were calculated. To estimate the position of the new nest, the centroids of the core areas (50% KDEs) were calculated during the incubation months (February–April). The equidistant position between those centroids was calculated, which resulted in an estimation of the location of the new nest. In addition, the altitude of both nests (natal and first breeding) was calculated using a raster topographic map (Esri topographic). Finally, we verified if nesting areas were repeated (located in the same area, <5 ​km) in subsequent years.

    These calculations were carried out using QGIS 3.16.6. All the maps were drawn with the same software.

    Home range sizes and accumulated distances greatly varied between and within individuals (seven females, two males and eight individuals with undetermined sex; Table 2). The average monthly home ranges (95% KDE) and core areas (50% KDE) were 6543 ​± ​19,935 ​km2 (range: 80–156,882 ​km2), and 1174 ​± ​4004 ​km2 (range: 9–66,065 ​km2), respectively. The monthly accumulated distance averaged 2246 ​± ​1256 ​km. On the other hand, all vultures showed average monthly home range fidelities between 50 and 73% (n ​= ​17; Table 2). Furthermore, all individuals tracked for at least two years during reproductive age (n ​= ​11; Table 1) repeated the location of breeding areas in subsequent years.

    Table  2.  Monthly movement-related variables (accumulated distance, home ranges, core areas and monthly home range fidelity) for the 17 Cinereous Vultures tracked in this study. Values appear as mean ​± ​SD (minimum–maximum).
    ID Sex Analysed period Monthly accumulated distance Home range (95% KDE; km2) Core area (50% KDE, km2) Monthly home range fidelity (%)
    Bullaque F 2011–2012 – 2137 ± 2232 (446–5967) 333 ± 332 (89–918) 68 ± 28
    Peña F 2010–2013 – 11,071 ± 13,194 (785–52,987) 2021 ± 3051 (63–13,239) 50 ± 35
    Cabeza F 2002–2003 – 21,631 ± 43,734 (247–156,882) 2586 ± 401 (2303–2870) 71 ± 22
    Aldara F 2012–2022 – 2276 ± 1186 (957–7839) 442 ± 327 (109–1888) 59 ± 28
    Risco F 2019–2021 – 38,418 ± 60,739 (295–288,659) 7194 ± 13,235 (234–66,065) 62 ± 34
    Natura – 2019–2022 2267 ± 992 6539 ± 4754 (247–18,297) 921 ± 833 (25–2621) 61 ± 31
    Sierra – 2018–2019 – 21,530 ± 16,255 (11–48,139) 5136 ± 3740 (22–11,032) 67 ± 35
    Larguijo – 2020 2476 ± 1742 21,651 ± 18,122 (4922–48,477) 4315 ± 3993 (306–10,447) 63 ± 34
    Larguijo20_1 – 2020–2022 1867 ± 904 867 ± 596 (353–2819) 102 ± 96 (18–429) 73 ± 24
    Larguijo20_2 – 2020–2021 2239 ± 1351 2719 ± 1371 (851–4945) 413 ± 324 (100–1007) 62 ± 24
    Larguijo20_3 – 2020 3423 ± 1900 4157 ± 1125 (3000–6073) 801 ± 279 (453–1165) 68 ± 15
    Jalama – 2018–2020 2488 ± 1310 5584 ± 4366 (128–16,355) 614 ± 611 (14–1950) 59 ± 33
    Benedicto – 2018–2019 2610 ± 1388 4294 ± 5734 (294–21,063) 577 ± 1030 (33–3346) 58 ± 28
    Teja F 2015–2019 – 1279 ± 1022 (163–6214) 157 ± 133 (10–619) 67 ± 29
    Granadilla F 2014–2016 – 633 ± 435 (80–1591) 57 ± 37 (12–143) 60 ± 27
    Mamen M 2021–2022 1061 ± 755 1255 ± 1153 (111–3297) 87 ± 85 (19–295) 59 ± 33
    Pip M 2018–2022 – 2276 ± 1186 (957–7839) 124 ± 122 (9–771) 70 ± 27
    Total 2002–2022 2246 ± 1256 6543 ± 19,935 1174 ± 4004 63 ± 28
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    There were differences in the movement-related variables between seasonal periods (incubation, chick-rearing and non-breeding; Appendix Table S1). During the chick-rearing period, monthly accumulated distances were higher (P < 0.0001; Table 3; Fig. 1): 3316 ​± ​1108 (chick-rearing) vs. 1621 ​± ​622 (incubation) vs. 1726 ​± ​1159 ​km (non-breeding). On the other hand, there were no differences between incubation and non-breeding periods.

    Table  3.  Monthly accumulated distance, 95% KDE and 50% KDE during the different periods (incubation, chick-rearing, and non-breeding). Values appear as mean ​± ​SD (median). * Monthly accumulated distance was calculated using a sub-sample (eight individuals with 30-min location frequency; see Table 2).
    Period N* Monthly accumulated distance (km) Monthly 95% KDE (km2) Monthly 50% KDE (km2)
    Incubation (February–April) 112 1621 ± 622 4032 ± 6476 (1840) 670 ± 1407 (222)
    Chick-rearing (May–August) 163 3136 ± 1108 11,035 ± 31,267 (2241) 1931 ± 6460 (398)
    Non-breeding (September–January) 209 1726 ± 1159 4385 ± 8107 (1638) 852 ± 1726 (258)
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure  1.  Differences in the monthly accumulated distances between the three considered periods (incubation, chick-rearing and non breeding).
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Seasonal differences in the monthly KDEs (95% and 50%) were found too. Home range sizes during chick-rearing were significantly larger than those of the other periods (Appendix Table S1). 95% KDEs averaged 11,035 ​± ​31,267 ​km2 during the chick-rearing period, 4032 ​± ​6476 during incubation, and 4385 ​± ​8107 during the non-breeding period. 50% KDEs averaged 1931 ​± ​6460 ​km2 during the chick-rearing period, 670 ​± ​1407 during incubation, and 852 ​± ​1726 during the non-breeding period (Table 3; Figs. 2 and 3). However, the monthly KDEs during all periods followed a non-normal skewed distribution, so mean values might not be enough to explore differences in home range sizes between periods, and median values may be more informative: 95% KDEs median values were 1840 ​km2 during incubation, 2241 ​km2 during chick-rearing, and 1648 ​km2 during the non-breeding period (Table 3). Within the three periods, smaller home ranges were considerably more frequent than larger ones. However, larger KDEs were estimated more frequently during chick-rearing for some individuals (Figs. 2 and 3).

    Figure  2.  Distribution of monthly KDEs (95 and 50%) within the three considered periods (incubation, chick-rearing and non-breeding). The variables followed a non-normal distribution.
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint
    Figure  3.  Monthly home ranges (95% KDE) of the Cinereous Vultures during the entire tracked periods. Each pannel corresponds to one individual, and each polygon to a monthly home range. Dark blue ​= ​incubation (February–April), pink ​= ​chick-rearing (May–August), Light blue ​= ​non-breeding (September–January).
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Finally, the Cinereous Vultures tagged as nestlings (n ​= ​6) established their first breeding area 54 ​± ​51 ​km from the natal nest (range ​= ​9–138 ​km). The two individuals from the eastern pre-Pyrenees (IDs: Mamen and Pip) located their first breeding area 9 and 10 ​km from their natal nest, respectively. Individuals from the Centre, South-Centre and West of the Iberian Peninsula established their first breeding area tens of kilometres away, reaching 138 ​km in one western individual (Table 4; Fig. 4).

    Table  4.  Philopatry patterns of six Cinereous Vultures, tagged as nestlings and tracked until reproductive age, including Euclidian distance between natal nest and new breeding area, and fidelity to breeding area. A hyphen (−) indicates unavailable information.
    ID Sex Region Natal nest altitude (m) Firts breeding area altitude (m) Distance between them (km) Fidelity to breeding area (at least two years)
    Bullaque F Center-South 820 1120 22 –
    Risco F Center 1480 1000 80 Yes
    Sierra – West 285 520 138 –
    Teja F West 220 380 65 Yes
    Mamen M Northeast 1460 1180 10 Yes
    Pip M Northeast 1460 1440 9 Yes
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure  4.  Natal dispersal of six cinereous vultures. The map represents the Euclidian distance between the natal nest and the first breeding area established by the individuals.
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    This study provides a comprehensive overview of the spatial ecology of the Iberian Cinereous Vultures throughout the annual cycle, highlighting the home range fidelity, the seasonal differences in the movement-related variables, and the philopatric tendency of the species.

    Cinereous Vultures maximised the use of the space throughout the Iberian Peninsula, occupying areas of 6543 ​km2 per month on average (95% KDE), ranging from 4032 during the incubation period to 11,035 ​km2 in the chick-rearing period. These values are considerably higher than those estimated for other Iberian raptors. Prey-hunting territorial birds such as the Bonelli's Eagle (Aquila fasciata) used 55 ​km2 (Morollón et al., 2022). The Lesser Kestrel (Falco naumanni), a colonial falconid, used 13.37 ​km2 during the breeding season in eastern Iberia (Vidal-Mateo et al., 2019). The Red Kite (Milvus milvus), an opportunistic and facultative scavenger, used 3.65 ​km2 during the breeding period (García-Macía et al., 2022b), and 1158 ​km2 during the wintering season (García-Macía et al., 2022a). Other Iberian species of vultures showed similar home range sizes to those of Cinereous Vultures: 11,765 ​km2 in the Bearded Vulture (Gypaetus barbatus; Gil et al., 2014), and 5027 ​km2 in the Griffon Vulture (Gyps fulvus; Morant et al., 2023). On the other hand, our home range estimations were higher than those of other surveys on the Cinereous Vultures performed in the eastern Mediterranean basin (i.e., Greece; Vasilakis et al., 2008), but those home range estimations may be severely underestimated because it was carried out by traditional radiotracking. Thus, the species and their foraging habits greatly influences home range size. However, landscape-related factors (including from orographic characteristics to habitat heterogeneity) may also strongly influence home ranges of large scavengers, which are species highly dependent on carrion distribution (Ruxton and Houston, 2004). Therefore, regional differences in the spatial ecology of vultures are expected, even within Iberia. Future studies may analyse the influence of region in home range size and the habitat use of the Cinereous Vultures.

    The home range fidelity of adult Cinereous Vultures was high, in contrast to juvenile individuals during the dispersal period (own data). This repeatability may be linked to breeding constraints and colonial hierarchy. First, the movements of adults are limited during most part of the year due to the presence of eggs, which must be incubated, and subsequently of chicks, which must be fed. Both members of the pair are involved in these two processes (incubation and chick-rearing), so sex differences during the breeding season are expected to be low. However, some studies on other similar scavengers in Iberia reported that females often occupy larger areas than males (Morant et al., 2023), which may be due to the higher flight effort of females during chick-rearing. Second, adults are higher within the colonial hierarchy, so they have priority access during carrion exploitation (van Overveld et al., 2018). This allows, under stable environmental conditions, the repeatability of home ranges. The high home range fidelity in adult vultures may decrease mortality risks, because individuals restrict their movements to well-known landscapes.

    The high seasonal and individual variability should be highlighted. During the chick-rearing period (May–August), monthly accumulated distances and home range sizes were approximately 2- and 3-fold higher than those of incubation and non-breeding periods, respectively. There are two likely causes for these seasonal differences. Firstly, chick-rearing entails higher food demands, which need to be provided by the parental individuals. Therefore, larger movements and foraging areas are expected during this period in both sexes (López-López et al., 2021). Secondly, the increase of movement-related variables during chick-rearing may also be a consequence of the better environmental conditions for flying (thermal currents, more daylight hours, less rainfall and unfavourable winds, etc.) during spring and summer. These two explanations are not mutually exclusive. In fact, the phenology of the breeding season is a great advantage for large soaring-gliding raptors, as it allows them to cover larger areas of the territory with low energy expenditure. However, these data must be interpreted with caution because of the lack of information on some reproductive variables: reproductive success was not confirmed by field work. Non-reproductive adults might have different spatial patterns because they are not influenced by hatching and chick-rearing processes. Furthermore, many other unconsidered factors may be critical to explain the variability of Cinereous Vultures’ movements: i.e., supplementary feeding sites, habitat characteristics, type of carrion abundance in the region, etc.

    The Cinereous Vultures settled their breeding area a few tens of kilometres from their natal nests, always within the same Iberian region. These philopatric patterns were expected due to the colonial behaviour of the species, also present in other colonial raptors in Iberia (García-Macía et al., 2022b). In colonial scavengers, philopatry could allow the stabilization of the colonies within their territories, but may have negative consequences in the expansion of their distribution area. The data collected by censuses of the species in Spain suggested that, despite the general increase in the populations, the distribution range of breeding individuals remained stable, except for re-introduced colonies (Del Moral, 2022). Therefore, the natural expansion of the distribution range of the species may have been limited by its philopatric behaviour, so re-introduction projects may be an appropriate management tool. On the other hand, although the sample size in our study was small, differences between regions in the natal dispersal should not be discarded: bigger colonies (located in West and Centre-South regions) showed further natal dispersal in our study, which may be a consequence of intraspecific competence for carrion exploitation or the presence of supplementary feeding sites. Future studies may explore the variability of the natal dispersal of the species in more detail.

    JG-M: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis and writing of the original draft. EA, MG, JJI-L, MG, GP, and MV: tagging of individuals, data management and projects administration. VU: conceptualization, review & editing, and supervision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    The experiments comply with the current laws of Spain and taggings were carried out with the permission of the Administration.

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    We would like to thank the Government of Aragon (SARGA), the Cos d’Agents Rurals de Catalunya (CAR), and the Grup de Suport de Muntanya for their collaboration in the tagging of the Caça de Boumort National Reserve. We are also grateful for the effort made by the Natural Environment Agents from Extremadura in the monitoring of the Cinereous Vulture population and their collaboration in the captures and taggings, especially to their Vertical Work Team; and for the work done by the Center for Wildlife Recovery and Environmental Education "Los Hornos" and the Wildlife Hospital of AMUS. This paper is part of Jorge García-Macía's Ph.D thesis.

    Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avrs.2023.100134.

    • References (127)
  • Abreu, C., Rocha-Pereira, N., Sarmento, A., Magro, F., 2015. Nocardia infections among immunomodulated inflammatory bowel disease patients: a review. World J. Gastroenterol. 21, 6491–6498.
    Alberdi, A., Aizpurua, O., Bohmann, K., Zepeda-Mendoza, M.L., Gilbert, M.T.P., 2016. Do vertebrate gut metagenomes confer rapid ecological adaptation? Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 689–699.
    Alm, E.W., Daniels-Witt, Q.R., Learman, D.R., Ryu, H., Jordan, D.W., Gehring, T.M., et al., 2018. Potential for gulls to transport bacteria from human waste sites to beaches. Sci. Total Environ. 615, 123–130.
    Amano, T., 2009. Conserving bird species in Japanese farmland: past achievements and future challenges. Biol. Conserv. 142, 1913–1921.
    Amato, K.R., Leigh, S.R., Kent, A., Mackie, R.I., Yeoman, C.J., Stumpf, R.M., et al., 2015. The gut microbiota appears to compensate for seasonal diet variation in the wild black howler monkey (Alouatta pigra). Microbial Ecol. 69, 434–443.
    Bacciarini, L., Posthaus, H., Pagan, O., Miserez, R., 1999. Nocardia nova causing pulmonary nocardiosis of black crakes (Limnocorax flavirostra). Vet. Pathol. 36, 345–347.
    Bajaj, J.S., Ridlon, J.M., Hylemon, P.B., Thacker, L.R., Heuman, D.M., Smith, S., et al., 2012. Linkage of gut microbiome with cognition in hepatic encephalopathy. Am. J. Physiol.-Gastr. L. 302, G168-G175.
    Baniel, A., Amato, K.R., Beehner, J.C., Bergman, T.J., Mercer, A., Perlman, R.F., et al., 2021. Seasonal shifts in the gut microbiome indicate plastic responses to diet in wild geladas. Microbiome 9, 1–20.
    Barnes, E.M., 1972. The avian intestinal flora with particular reference to the possible ecological significance of the cecal anaerobic bacteria. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 25, 1475–1479.
    Barzen, J., 2012. Studying and understanding wetland dynamics. In: Li, F., Liu, G., Wu, J., Zeng, N., Harris, J., Jin, J. (Eds.), Ecological Study of Wetlands and Waterbirds at Poyang Lake. Popular Science Press, Beijing, pp. 256-266.
    BirdLife International, 2022. Species factsheet: Leucogeranus leucogeranus. . (Accessed 29 November 2022).
    Bolyen, E., Rideout, J.R., Dillon, M.R., Bokulich, N.A., Abnet, C.C., Al-Ghalith, G.A., et al., 2019. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857.
    Burrell, P., O'sullivan, C., Song, H., Clarke, W., Blackall, L., 2004. Identification, detection, and spatial resolution of Clostridium populations responsible for cellulose degradation in a methanogenic landfill leachate bioreactor. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 2414–2419.
    Callahan, B.J., McMurdie, P.J., Rosen, M.J., Han, A.W., Johnson, A.J.A., Holmes, S.P., 2016. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583.
    Cao, L., Zhang, Y., Barter, M., Lei, G., 2010. Anatidae in eastern China during the non-breeding season: Geographical distributions and protection status. Biol. Conserv. 143, 650–659.
    Chen, Y., Yang, F., Lu, H., Wang, B., Chen, Y., Lei, D., et al., 2011. Characterization of fecal microbial communities in patients with liver cirrhosis. Hepatology 54, 562–572.
    China National Food Safety Standard, 2003. Determination of Crude Fiber in Vegetable Foods (GB/T 5009.10-2003). Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China and Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China, Beijing.
    China National Food Safety Standard, 2010. Determination of Protein in Foods (GB 5009.5-2010). Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China, Beijing.
    China National Food Safety Standard, 2016a. Determination of Fat in Foods (GB 5009.6-2016). National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People's Republic of China and China Food and Drug Administration, Beijing.
    China National Food Safety Standard, 2016b. Determination of Starch in Foods (GB 5009.9-2016). National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People's Republic of China and China Food and Drug Administration, Beijing.
    China National Forestry Industry Standards, 1999. Determination of Crude Ash Content in Forest Plant and Forest Floor (LY/T 1268-1999). Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing.
    Choi, C.-Y., Takekawa, J.Y., Xiong, Y., Ying, L., Wikelski, M., Heine, G., et al., 2016. Tracking domestic ducks: A novel approach for documenting poultry market chains in the context of avian influenza transmission. J. Integr. Agric. 15, 1584–1594.
    Claesson, M.J., Jeffery, I.B., Conde, S., Power, S.E., O'connor, E.M., Cusack, S., et al., 2012. Gut microbiota composition correlates with diet and health in the elderly. Nature 488, 178–184.
    Clarke, S.F., Murphy, E.F., O'Sullivan, O., Lucey, A.J., Humphreys, M., Hogan, A., et al., 2014. Exercise and associated dietary extremes impact on gut microbial diversity. Gut 63, 1913–1920.
    Czech, H.A., Parsons, K.C., 2002. Agricultural wetlands and waterbirds: a review. Waterbirds 25, 56–65.
    Dai, X., Wan, R., Yang, G., 2015. Non-stationary water-level fluctuation in China's Poyang Lake and its interactions with Yangtze River. J. Geogr. Sci. 25, 274–288.
    Darimont, C.T., Reimchen, T.E., Bryan, H.M., Paquet, P.C., 2008. Faecal-centric approaches to wildlife ecology and conservation: methods, data and ethics. Wildlife Biol. Pract. 4, 73–87.
    David, L.A., Maurice, C.F., Carmody, R.N., Gootenberg, D.B., Button, J.E., Wolfe, B.E., et al., 2014. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature 505, 559–563.
    Davidson, N.C., 2014. How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area. Mar. Freshw. Res. 65, 934–941.
    Davidson, G.L., Wiley, N., Cooke, A.C., Johnson, C.N., Fouhy, F., Reichert, M.S., et al., 2020. Diet induces parallel changes to the gut microbiota and problem solving performance in a wild bird. Sci. Rep. 10, 20783.
    Dhama, K., Mahendran, M., Tiwari, R., Singh, S.D., Kumar, D., Singh, S., et al., 2011. Tuberculosis in birds: insights into the Mycobacterium avium infections. Vet. Med. Int. 2011, 712369.
    Di, M., Weng, X. Lu, P., Lu, Y., Dai, N., 2022. Dynamics of Grus leucogeranus in two farms in Poyang Lake during the winter of 2020-2021. Weland Sci. Manage. 18, 23–26.
    Ezenwa, V.O., Gerardo, N.M., Inouye, D.W., Medina, M., Xavier, J.B., 2012. Animal behavior and the microbiome. Science 338, 198–199.
    Fava, F., Gitau, R., Griffin, B.A., Gibson, G., Tuohy, K., Lovegrove, J., 2013. The type and quantity of dietary fat and carbohydrate alter faecal microbiome and short-chain fatty acid excretion in a metabolic syndrome 'at-risk'population. Int. J. Obes. 37, 216–223.
    Feng, L., Hu, C., Chen, X., Cai, X., Tian, L., Gan, W., 2012. Assessment of inundation changes of Poyang Lake using MODIS observations between 2000 and 2010. Remote Sens. Environ. 121, 80–92.
    Fontana, A., Manchia, M., Panebianco, C., Paribello, P., Arzedi, C., Cossu, E., et al. 2020. Exploring the role of gut microbiota in major depressive disorder and in treatment resistance to antidepressants. Biomedicines 8, 311.
    Fox, A.D., Abraham, K.F., 2017. Why geese benefit from the transition from natural vegetation to agriculture. Ambio 46, 188–197.
    Fox, A.D., Madsen, J., 2017. Threatened species to super-abundance: The unexpected international implications of successful goose conservation. Ambio 46, 179–187.
    Fox, A.D., Elmberg, J., Tombre, I.M., Hessel, R., 2017. Agriculture and herbivorous waterfowl: A review of the scientific basis for improved management. Biol. Rev. 92, 854–877.
    Franc, K., Krecek, R., Häsler, B., Arenas-Gamboa, A., 2018. Brucellosis remains a neglected disease in the developing world: a call for interdisciplinary action. BMC Publ. Health 18, 125.
    Fu, R., Xiang, X., Dong, Y., Cheng, L., Zhou, L., 2020. Comparing the intestinal bacterial communies of sympatric wintering Hooded Crane (Grus monacha) and Domestic Goose (Anser anser domesticus). Avian Res. 11, 13.
    Fuirst, M., Veit, R.R., Hahn, M., Dheilly, N., Thorne, L.H. 2018., Effects of urbanization on the foraging ecology and microbiota of the generalist seabird Larus argentatus. PLoS One 13, e0209200.
    Ganz, H.H., Doroud, L., Firl, A.J., Hird, S.M., Eisen, J.A., Boyce, W.M., 2017. Community-level differences in the microbiome of healthy wild mallards and those infected by influenza A viruses. MSystems 2, e00188-00116.
    Gao, B., Zhong, M., Shen, Q., Wu, Y., Cao, M., Ju, S., et al., 2020. Gut microbiota in early pregnancy among women with Hyperglycaemia vs. Normal blood glucose. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 20, 284.
    Gevers, D., Kugathasan, S., Denson, L.A., Vázquez-Baeza, Y., Van Treuren, W., Ren, B., et al., 2014. The treatment-naive microbiome in new-onset Crohn's disease. Cell Host Microbe 15, 382–392.
    Gibbs, P.S., Kasa, R., Newbrey, J.L., Petermann, S.R., Wooley, R.E., Vinson, H.M., et al., 2007. Identification, antimicrobial resistance profiles, and virulence of members from the family Enterobacteriaceae from the feces of yellow-headed blackbirds (Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus) in North Dakota. Avian Dis. 51, 649–655.
    Gilbert, S.F., Bosch, T.C., Ledón-Rettig, C., 2015. Eco-Evo-Devo: developmental symbiosis and developmental plasticity as evolutionary agents. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 611–622.
    Góngora, E., Elliott, K.H., Whyte, L., 2021. Gut microbiome is affected by inter-sexual and inter-seasonal variation in diet for thick-billed murres (Uria lomvia). Sci. Rep. 11, 1–12.
    Grond, K., Ryu, H., Baker, A.J., Santo Domingo, J.W., Buehler, D.M., 2014. Gastro-intestinal microbiota of two migratory shorebird species during spring migration staging in Delaware Bay, USA. J. Ornithol. 155, 969–977.
    Grond, K., Sandercock, B.K., Jumpponen, A., Zeglin, L.H., 2018. The avian gut microbiota: community, physiology and function in wild birds. J. Avian Biol. 49, e01788.
    Hall, A.B., Tolonen, A.C., Xavier, R.J., 2017. Human genetic variation and the gut microbiome in disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18, 690–699.
    Harris, J., Mirande, C., 2013. A global overview of cranes: status, threats and conservation priorities. Chinese Birds 4, 189–209.
    He, W., Shao, M., Zhi, Y., Dai, N., Lu, P., Tu, X., 2019. Waterbird diversity in three reclamation regions of Poyang Lake. Chinese J. Ecol. 38, 2765–2771.
    Hemminger, K., König, H., Månsson, J., Bellingrath-Kimura, S.D., Nilsson, L., 2022. Winners and losers of land use change: A systematic review of interactions between the world's crane species (Gruidae) and the agricultural sector. Ecol. Evol. 12, e8719.
    Herlemann, D., Labrenz, M., Jürgens, K., Bertilsson, S., Waniek, J.J., Andersson, A.F., 2011. Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea. ISME J. 5, 1571–1579.
    Hicks, A.L., Lee, K.J., Couto-Rodriguez, M., Patel, J., Sinha, R., Guo, C., et al., 2018. Gut microbiomes of wild great apes fluctuate seasonally in response to diet. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–18.
    Hird, S.M., Sánchez, C., Carstens, B.C., Brumfield, R.T., 2015. Comparative gut microbiota of 59 neotropical bird species. Front. Microbiol. 6, 1403.
    Hooper, L.V., Littman, D.R., Macpherson, A.J., 2012. Interactions between the microbiota and the immune system. Science 336, 1268–1273.
    Hou, J., Wang, Y., Jin, B., Wang, L., Wang, W., 2019. Food composition of Siberian Cranes in agricultural fields in the Poyang Lake, China. Chin. J. Zool. 54, 15–21.
    Hou, J., Liu, Y., Fraser, J.D., Li, L., Zhao, B., Lan, Z., et al., 2020. Drivers of a habitat shift by critically endangered Siberian cranes: Evidence from long-term data. Ecol. Evol. 10, 11055–11068.
    Hou, J., Li, L., Wang, Y., Wang, W., Zhan, H., Dai, N., et al., 2021. Influences of submerged plant collapse on diet composition, breadth, and overlap among four crane species at Poyang Lake, China. Front. Zool. 18, 1–17.
    Hu, Z., Lin, Y., 2019. Analysis of evolution process and driving factors for aquatic vegetations of Poyang Lake in 30 years. Resour. Environ. Yangtze Basin 28, 1947–1955.
    Jia, Y., 2013. Impact of Water Level Fluctuation on Siberian Crane and Other Wintering Waterbirds in Poyang Lake. Doctoral Thesis. Beijing Forestry University, Beijing.
    Jia, Y., Jiao, S., Zhang, Y., Zhou, Y., Lei, G., Liu, G., 2013. Diet shift and its impact on foraging behavior of Siberian crane (Grus leucogeranus) in Poyang Lake. PLoS One 8, e65843.
    Kim, H.I., Hong, S.H., Lee, S.Y., Ku, J.M., Kim, M.J., Ko, S.-G., 2021. Gardenia jasminoides ameliorates antibiotic-associated aggravation of DNCB-induced atopic dermatitis by restoring the intestinal microbiome profile. Nutrients 13, 1349.
    Knutie, S.A., Chaves, J.A., Gotanda, K.M., 2019. Human activity can influence the gut microbiota of Darwin's finches in the Galapagos Islands. Mol. Ecol. 28, 2441–2450.
    Kobayashi, T., Osaki, T., Oikawa, S., 2015. Use of T-RFLP and seven restriction enzymes to compare the faecal microbiota of obese and lean Japanese healthy men. Benef. Microbes 6, 735–745.
    Le Bastard, Q., Al-Ghalith, G., Grégoire, M., Chapelet, G., Javaudin, F., Dailly, E., et al., 2018. Systematic review: human gut dysbiosis induced by non-antibiotic prescription medications. Aliment Pharmacol. Therapeut. 47, 332–345.
    Le Chatelier, E., Nielsen, T., Qin, J., Prifti, E., Hildebrand, F., Falony, G., et al., 2013. Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers. Nature 500, 541–546.
    Lewis, W.B., Moore, F.R., Wang, S. 2017. Changes in gut microbiota of migratory passerines during stopover after crossing an ecological barrier. Auk 134, 137–145.
    Ley, R.E., Hamady, M., Lozupone, C., Turnbaugh, P.J., Ramey, R.R., Bircher, J.S., et al., 2008. Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes. Science 320, 1647–1651.
    Li, Y., Qian, F., Silbernagel, J., Larson, H., 2019. Community structure, abundance variation and population trends of waterbirds in relation to water level fluctuation in Poyang Lake. J. Great Lake. Res. 45, 976–985.
    Li, M., Wang, B., Zhang, M., Rantalainen, M., Wang, S., Zhou, H., et al., 2008. Symbiotic gut microbes modulate human metabolic phenotypes. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 2117–2122.
    Li, Y., Huang, J., Li, F., Yulin, O., 2013. Diurnal time budget and behavior rhythm of wintering tundra swan after higher water level in Poyang Lake. Sichuan J. Zool. 32, 498–503.
    Li, G., Yin, B., Li, J., Wang, J., Wei, W., Bolnick, D.I., et al., 2020. Host-microbiota interaction helps to explain the bottom-up effects of climate change on a small rodent species. ISME J. 14, 1795–1808.
    Li, G., Li, J., Kohl, K.D., Yin, B., Wei, W., Wan, X., et al., 2019. Dietary shifts influenced by livestock grazing shape the gut microbiota composition and co-occurrence networks in a local rodent species. J. Anim. Ecol. 88, 302–314.
    Li, C., Liu, Y., Gong, M., Zheng, C., Zhang, C., Li, H., et al., 2021. Diet-induced microbiome shifts of sympatric overwintering birds. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 105, 5993–6005.
    Li, Y., Zhong, Y., Shao, R., Yan, C., Jin, J., Shan, J., et al., 2020. Modified hydrological regime from the three gorges dam increases the risk of food shortages for wintering waterbirds in Poyang Lake. Global Ecol. Conserv. 24, e01286.
    Long, P., Choi, G., Silberman, M., 1983. Nocardiosis in two Pesquet's parrots (Psittrichas fulgidus). Avian Dis. 855–859.
    Lu, Z., Li, S., Wang, M., Wang, C., Meng, D., Liu, J., 2022. Comparative analysis of the gut microbiota of three sympatric terrestrial wild bird species overwintering in farmland habitats. Front. Microbiol. 13, 905668.
    Macke, E., Tasiemski, A., Massol, F., Callens, M., Decaestecker, E., 2017. Life history and eco-evolutionary dynamics in light of the gut microbiota. Oikos 126, 508–531.
    Mahtab, N., Zhou, L., Zhang, F., Wang, W., 2021. Seasonal variations in the gut fungal communities of Hooded Crane (Grus monacha) at wintering and stopover sites in China. Animals 11, 941.
    Manichanh, C., Rigottier-Gois, L., Bonnaud, E., Gloux, K., Pelletier, E., Frangeul, L., et al., 2006. Reduced diversity of faecal microbiota in Crohn's disease revealed by a metagenomic approach. Gut 55, 205–211.
    Margiotta, E., Caldiroli, L., Callegari, M.L., Miragoli, F., Zanoni, F., Armelloni, S., et al., 2021. Association of sarcopenia and gut microbiota composition in older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease, investigation of the interactions with uremic toxins, inflammation and oxidative stress. Toxins 13, 472.
    McMurdie, P.J., Holmes, S., 2013. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PloS one 8, e61217.
    Medawar, E., Haange, S.-B., Rolle-Kampczyk, U., Engelmann, B., Dietrich, A., Thieleking, R., et al., 2021. Gut microbiota link dietary fiber intake and short-chain fatty acid metabolism with eating behavior. Transl. Psychiatry 11, 1–11.
    Meng, W., He, M., Hu, B., Mo, X., Li, H., Liu, B., et al., 2017. Status of wetlands in China: A review of extent, degradation, issues and recommendations for improvement. Ocean Coast Manag. 146, 50–59.
    Meng, S., Chen, B., Yang, J., Wang, J., Zhu, D., Meng, Q., et al., 2018. Study of microbiomes in aseptically collected samples of human breast tissue using needle biopsy and the potential role of in situ tissue microbiomes for promoting malignancy. Front. Oncol. 8, 318.
    Michel, A.J., Ward, L.M., Goffredi, S.K., Dawson, K.S., Baldassarre, D.T., Brenner, A., et al., 2018. The gut of the finch: uniqueness of the gut microbiome of the Galápagos vampire finch. Microbiome 6, 1–14.
    Moono, P, Foster, N.F., Hampson, D.J., Knight, D.R., Bloomfield, L.E., Riley, T.V., 2016. Clostridium difficile infection in production animals and avian species: a review. Foodb. Pathog. Dis. 13, 647–655.
    Muegge, B.D., Kuczynski, J., Knights, D., Clemente, J.C., González, A., Fontana, L., et al., 2011. Diet drives convergence in gut microbiome functions across mammalian phylogeny and within humans. Science 332, 970–974.
    Murray, M.H., Lankau, E.W., Kidd, A.D., Welch, C.N., Ellison, T., Adams, H.C., et al., 2020. Gut microbiome shifts with urbanization and potentially facilitates a zoonotic pathogen in a wading bird. PLoS One 15, e0220926.
    Muzaffar, S.B., Takekawa, J.Y., Prosser, D.J., Newman, S.H., Xiao, X., 2010. Rice production systems and avian influenza: interactions between mixed-farming systems, poultry and wild birds. Waterbirds 33, 219–230.
    Nagy-Szakal, D., Hollister, E.B., Luna, R.A., Szigeti, R., Tatevian, N., Smith, C.W., et al., 2013. Cellulose supplementation early in life ameliorates colitis in adult mice. PloS one 8, e56685.
    Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F.G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P.R., O'hara, R., et al., 2013. vegan: Community Ecology Package. .
    Pan, L., Han, P., Ma, S., Peng, R., Wang, C., Kong, W., et al., 2020. Abnormal metabolism of gut microbiota reveals the possible molecular mechanism of nephropathy induced by hyperuricemia. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 10, 249–261.
    Pfeiler, E.A., Klaenhammer, T.R., 2007. The genomics of lactic acid bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 15, 546–553.
    Phillips, G., Willby, N., Moss, B., 2016. Submerged macrophyte decline in shallow lakes: what have we learnt in the last forty years? Aquat. Bot. 135, 37–45.
    Prosser, D.J., Palm, E.C., Takekawa, J.Y., Zhao, D., Xiao, X., Li, P., et al., 2016. Movement analysis of free-grazing domestic ducks in Poyang Lake, China: a disease connection. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 30, 869–880.
    Quast, C., Pruesse, E., Yilmaz, P., Gerken, J., Schweer, T., Yarza, P., et al., 2013. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590-D596.
    Salamon, D., Sroka-Oleksiak, A., Kapusta, P., Szopa, M., Mrozińska, S., Ludwig-Słomczyńska, A.H., et al., 2018. Characteristics of gut microbiota in adult patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes based on next-generation sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene fragment. Pol. Arch. Intern. Med. 128, 336–343.
    Scanu, A.M., Bull, T.J., Cannas, S., Sanderson, J.D., Sechi, L.A., Dettori, G., et al., 2007. Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infection in cases of irritable bowel syndrome and comparison with Crohn's Disease and Johne's Disease: common neural and immune pathogenicities. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45, 3883–3890.
    Shao, M., Gong, H., Dai, N., Zhi, Y., Xu, N., Lu, P., 2018. Study on time budgets and behavioral rhythm of wintering Siberian cranes in a lotus pond reclamation area in Poyang Lake. Acta Ecol. Sin. 38, 5206–5212.
    Tang, X., Zhang, L., Fan, C., Wang, L., Fu, H., Ren, S.E., et al., 2021. Dietary fiber influences bacterial community assembly processes in the gut microbiota of Durco×Bamei Crossbred Pig. Front. Microbiol. 12, 688554.
    Teyssier, A., Matthysen, E., Hudin, N.S., De Neve, L., White, J., Lens, L., 2020. Diet contributes to urban-induced alterations in gut microbiota: experimental evidence from a wild passerine. Proc. R. Soc. B 287, 20192182.
    Van Dyke, M., McCarthy, A., 2002. Molecular biological detection and characterization of Clostridium populations in municipal landfill sites. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 2049–2053.
    Van Immerseel, F., Rood, J.I., Moore, R.J., Titball, R.W., 2009. Rethinking our understanding of the pathogenesis of necrotic enteritis in chickens. Trends Microbiol. 17, 32–36.
    Van Veelen, H.P.J., Salles, J.F., Tieleman, B.I., 2017. Multi-level comparisons of cloacal, skin, feather and nest-associated microbiota suggest considerable influence of horizontal acquisition on the microbiota assembly of sympatric woodlarks and skylarks. Micobiome 5, 156.
    Videvall, E., Song, S.J., Bensch, H.M., Strandh, M., Engelbrecht, A., Serfontein, N., et al., 2019. Major shifts in gut microbiota during development and its relationship to growth in ostriches. Mol. Ecol. 28, 2653–2667.
    Waite, D.W., Taylor, M.W., 2014. Characterizing the avian gut microbiota: membership, driving influences, and potential function. Front. Microbiol. 5, 223.
    Wang, Q., Garrity, G.M., Tiedje, J.M., Cole, J.R., 2007. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 5261–5267.
    Wang, W., Fraser, J.D., Chen, J., 2017. Wintering waterbirds in the middle and lower Yangtze River floodplain: changes in abundance and distribution. Bird Conserv. Int. 27, 167–186.
    Wang, W., Wang, L., Hou, J., 2019. Man-made habitats have become important foraging areas of Siberian cranes. Chinese J. Wildlife 40, 133–137.
    Wang, Q., Zhao, L., Bin, Y., Wang, L., Wang, L., Zhang, K., et al., 2022. Blood bacterial 16S rRNA gene alterations in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Front. Endocrinol. 13, 814520.
    West, A.G., Waite, D.W., Deines, P., Bourne, D.G., Digby, A., McKenzie, V.J., et al., 2019. The microbiome in threatened species conservation. Biol. Conserv. 229, 85–98.
    Wickham, H., 2009. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer, New York.
    Wooley R, Gibbs P, Brown T, Maurer J., 2000. Chicken embryo lethality assay for determining the virulence of avian Escherichia coli isolates. Avian Dis. 44, 318–324.
    Wu, J., Li, F., Burnham, J., 2013. Numerical distribution of Siberian cranes and their relation to food and water depth in Sha Hu at Poyang Lake, China. Wetland Sci. 11, 305–312.
    Wu, Q., Wang, X., Ding, Y., Hu, Y., Nie, Y., Wei, W., et al., 2017. Seasonal variation in nutrient utilization shapes gut microbiome structure and function in wild giant pandas. Proc. R. Soc. A B 284, 20170955.
    Xiang, X., Zhang, F., Fu, R., Yan, S., Zhou, L., 2019. Significant differences in bacterial and potentially pathogenic communities between sympatric hooded crane and greater white-fronted goose. Front. Microbiol. 10, 163.
    Xing, Y., Wang, D., 2016. Research progress on surveillance related to avian influenza activity in the Poyang Lake Region of China. Chin. J. Zoonoses 32, 388–391.
    Yang, Z., Zhou L., 2021. Is intestinal bacterial diversity enhanced by trans-species spread in the mixed-species flock of Hooded Crane (Grus monacha) and Bean Goose (Anser fabalis) wintering in the lower and middle Yangtze River floodplain? Animals 11, 233.
    Zhang, Y., Jeppesen, E., Liu, X., Qin, B., Shi, K., Zhou, Y., et al., 2017. Global loss of aquatic vegetation in lakes. Earth Sci. Rev. 173, 259–265.
    Zhang, H., Chang, Y., Zheng, Q., Zhang, R., Hu, C., Jia, W., 2019. Altered intestinal microbiota associated with colorectal cancer. Front. Med. 13, 461–470.
    Zhang, F., Xiang, X., Dong, Y., Yan, S., Song, Y., Zhou, L., 2020. Significant differences in the gut bacterial communities of Hooded Crane (Grus monacha) in different seasons at a stopover site on the flyway. Animals 10, 701.
    Zhong, Y., 2020. Diversity and Habitat Selection of Birds in Poyang Lake Rice Fields. Master's Thesis. . Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang.
    Zhu, Y., Li, Y., Yang, H., He, K., Tang, K., 2021. Establishment of gut microbiome during early life and its relationship with growth in endangered crested ibis (Nipponia nippon). Front. Microbiol. 12, 723682.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    Chen Yang, Siheng Chen, Tianpei Guan. 2025: Does wetland degradation impact bird diversity differently across seasons? A case study of Zoige Alpine Wetland ecosystem. Avian Research, 16(1): 100227. DOI: 10.1016/j.avrs.2025.100227
    Xin Luo, Ning Li, Wei Tai, Yao Cai, Zheng Wang. 2024: Seed dispersal by wintering ducks in a coastal wetland of eastern China. Avian Research, 15(1): 100209. DOI: 10.1016/j.avrs.2024.100209
    Fucheng Yang, Mingqin Shao, Jianying Wang. 2024: Distributional and behavioral responses of the wintering Oriental Storks to drought in China's largest freshwater lake. Avian Research, 15(1): 100176. DOI: 10.1016/j.avrs.2024.100176
    Zhijun Ma, Chi-Yeung Choi, Xiaojing Gan, Jing Li, Yang Liu, David S. Melville, Tong Mu, Theunis Piersma, Zhengwang Zhang. 2023: Achievements, challenges, and recommendations for waterbird conservation in China's coastal wetlands. Avian Research, 14(1): 100123. DOI: 10.1016/j.avrs.2023.100123
    Dawei Wu, Canshi Hu, Mingming Zhang, Zhumei Li, Haijun Su. 2020: Foraging habitat selection of overwintering Black-necked Cranes in the farming area surrounding the Caohai Wetland, Guizhou Province, China. Avian Research, 11(1): 5. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-020-00192-y
    Yan Chen, Yong Zhang, Lei Cao, Willem F. de Boer, Anthony D. Fox. 2019: Wintering Swan Geese maximize energy intake through substrate foraging depth when feeding on buried Vallisneria natans tubers. Avian Research, 10(1): 6. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-019-0145-x
    Kang Luo, Zhaolu Wu, Haotian Bai, Zijiang Wang. 2019: Bird diversity and waterbird habitat preferences in relation to wetland restoration at Dianchi Lake, south-west China. Avian Research, 10(1): 21. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-019-0162-9
    K. M. Aarif, Aymen Nefla, S. B. Muzaffar, K. K. Musammilu, P. K. Prasadan. 2017: Traditional fishing activities enhance the abundance of selected waterbird species in a wetland in India. Avian Research, 8(1): 16. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-017-0073-6
    Wenjing Wan, LizhiZhou, Yunwei Song. 2016: Shifts in foraging behavior of wintering Hooded Cranes (Grus monacha) in three different habitats at Shengjin Lake, China. Avian Research, 7(1): 13. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-016-0047-0
    Fengshan LI, Jiandong WU, James HARRIS, James BURNHAM. 2012: Number and distribution of cranes wintering at Poyang Lake, China during 2011-2012. Avian Research, 3(3): 180-190. DOI: 10.5122/cbirds.2012.0027

Catalog

    Figures(5)  /  Tables(2)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article has an altmetric score of 1
    Article has an altmetric score of 1
    Article views (31) PDF downloads (5) Cited by()
    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd.   Technical support: info@rhhz.net

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return